55.1 Magic Squares and the Searl Disk 

John R. R. Searl's Tech Info (Zip Format) speaks of the use of magic square matrices to provide the "augmentation" or "magnification" of not only electron velocities but also kinetic velocities of the mass, otherwise known as "mass current" (Please refer to the next Section).

Commentary on the Searl Disk

John's concepts are quite simple. What the rings and rollers represent is a cross-section of a complete system shaped like a sphere with a hole in the middle or a torus. The reason that the rings do not take the shape of a sphere is because the rollers, if they were curved, could not possibly revolve, hence, limiting them to a flat-plane-3 tiered-diameter across an imaginary sphere. The Searl system strips electrons off the atoms (ions) that are drawn into the center of the tori and accelerates them to the outer rim where they are picked up by coils as electricity. The system is as unbalanced and recursive as David Hamel's spinners and Hamel which never lets the system find an equilibrium between plus and minus magnetism. Both Hamel and Searl systems oscillate back and forth as intrinsic magnetism tries to find the center but cannot. Hamel uses 3 cones and Searl uses 3 tiers of rings integrated with magic square configurations which are recursive (nested and ever repeating, never ending) which unbalances the system always. This unbalanced oscillation is defined by science as a "dynamic system" or o-point energy. Once the system is completely assembled, it tries to align with magnetisms nested oscillations which are infinite as far as we are concerned. Magnetism is defined as the Carrier wave of all matter information which is of the 2nd dimension.

In my files, Scientific American Magazine notes that, "electrons are antigravity". If this is correct, then electrons, are equated with a harmonic of the Carrier wave of all information to matter , and are not causing antigravity, but, as you can plainly see , "Are antigravity". Therefore electrons and the Carrier wave have some similar characteristics.

To view atoms as centers of neutrons and protons with electrons orbiting is an error. An advanced theory of an atoms shape will reveal that it is just as nested and recursively toroidal as the intrinsic toroidal shape of nested-toroidal-space. Another theorist, Hemet, of 25 years study, has accurately concluded that nature is basically toroidal, as his pictures show. His Torus Knot Topology pictures are also interesting. Here is a real picture of a real galaxy. The galaxy shown, has an invisible toroidal sphere around it although we can't see it. The jets are following a path through the center hole, as electrons (antimatter) are being thrown off the edge of the spinning disc, just like Searl's machine. These electrons are what science calls the missing matter of universe: "dark matter". The galaxy should also have a matrix of Magic Squares wrapping around the sphere, although we can't see this either. Derek Bond correctly describes how the spiraling toroidal field "... is a new unified field theorem [sic] regarding the functioning of our universe. It describes how stars, mass, time and space and black holes function in our spectrum of the universe." Atomic Vortex Theory. This is not the first Vortex Theory as claimed. Carl F. Krafft, in 1945, developed the Ether Vortex Theory and is covered in these files and is listed in the Bibliography.

Mass current

The Keelynet file, matrixag.asc  implies a mass orientation or polarization and not just a surface phenomena. Dan Davidson indicates that "orientation of orbital electrons in a phased matrix may radically change the structure of the crystal array by altering the quantum effects of the binding energy. The crystal may become a fluid in a quantum sense while retaining the structure of a crystal matrix".




55.2 Diagram. Magic Square, Mayan Tzolkin, 13 / 20 Permutations  

This represents

THE Code of Light permutations.

This magic square pertains to light (electrons, Tzolkin) therefore it is usable for a Searl machine. I.magi.ne folding the edges top, bottom, left and right so that the flat squares become a sphere with a hole in the middle, i.e., a torus. This is what this magic square represents anyway. Now place this torus around a Searl disk and figure out what numbers are needed. It should be possible with time spent observing. I.magi.ne a machine that is not a flat ring but expanded to a sphere around which a magic square is wrapped. This machine should operate as a Searl sphere if integrated properly, just as a galaxy does.

1

8

2

9

3

10

4

11

5

12

6

13

7

2

9

3

10

4

11

5

12

6

13

7

1

8

3

10

4

11

5

12

6

13

7

1

8

2

9

4

11

5

12

6

13

7

1

8

2

9

3

10

5

12

6

13

7

1

8

2

9

3

10

4

11

6

13

7

1

8

2

9

3

10

4

11

5

12

7

1

8

2

9

3

10

4

11

5

12

6

13

8

2

9

3

10

4

11

5

12

6

13

7

1

9

3

10

4

11

5

12

6

13

7

1

8

2

10

4

11

5

12

6

13

7

1

8

2

9

3

11

5

12

6

13

7

1

8

2

9

3

10

4

12

6

13

7

1

8

2

9

3

10

4

11

5

13

7

1

8

2

9

3

10

4

11

5

12

6

1

8

2

9

3

10

4

11

5

12

6

13

7

2

9

3

10

4

11

5

12

6

13

7

1

8

3

10

4

11

5

12

6

13

7

1

8

2

9

4

11

5

12

6

13

7

1

8

2

9

3

10

5

12

6

13

7

1

8

2

9

3

10

4

11

6

13

7

1

8

2

9

3

10

4

11

5

12

7

1

8

2

9

3

10

4

11

5

12

6

13







55.3 Diagram. Magic Square, Ben Franklin's 8 x 8 I-Ching Kua 

Here is Ben Franklin's 8 x 8 Magic Square as Kua (I-Ching hexagrams). This matrix represents

THE Code of Life which occupies the precise center of the above 13 / 20 Mayan Tzolkin.

If you draw a line sequentially from 1 to 64 you will see the double pattern of the permutations of life, represented by each kua, in The Mayan Factor by Jose Arguelles. It is also called The Mind of the Earth, The Van Allen Belts, Psi Bank, Oversoul, World Soul of Plato, Psychic Bank and Sensorium of Harold.

This magic square pertains to life (I-Ching), not light (Tzolkin), therefore it is not usable in a Searl configuration.

16

50

9

55

11

53

14

52

1

63

8

58

6

60

3

61

64

2

57

7

59

5

62

4

49

15

56

10

54

12

51

13

48

18

41

23

43

21

46

20

33

31

40

26

38

28

35

29

32

34

25

39

27

37

30

36

17

47

24

42

22

44

19

45





If the Magic Square of 8 x 8, was found by the Mayans, to represent the mind of the earth, then the Sun, being a more massive, hence, more organized form, should be found to represent an even larger, more organized Magic Square as indicated in the 7 levels of Magic Squares in File, "14 Space Patterns". Seemingly, there are other systems, of universal order operating, two of which, David Wilcock and David Wilcock call, Consciousness Units.

If you will connect straight lines between each two numbers of this magic square, sequentially, beginning with 1, you will discover a very ornate, 3-part pattern that should describe the Suns 256 (16 x 16) mind permutations (I-Ching).

This 16 x 16 Magic Square corresponds to the 8 x 8 of the earth, therefore I concluded that it is embedded in what I call a Sun Tzolkin of unknown number. To find that number I divided the earth Tzolkin (260) by the I-Ching 64 (8 x 8) = factor 4.0625, then multiplied factor 4.0625 x 256 (16 x 16), the number of squares in the Sun Magic Square, representing the Suns I-Ching. This gives 1040 squares in the Suns Tzolkin, but, upon taking the square root of 1040 I expected a round number like 32, 32 being the assumed next larger Magic Square (32 x 32), following the binary progression of nature namely 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, but to get 32 as an expected number one has to take the square root of a lesser number, 1024, as the square root of 1040 = 32.24903.

Summary:

The square root of:

The I-Ching, 64, of the earth = 8
The I-Ching, 256, of the Sun = 16
The Tzolkin, 260, of the earth = 16.124515
The Tzolkin, 1040, of the Sun = 32.24903

So it seems these ratios following are appropriate to describe earth and Sun mind, remembering that the I-Ching is embedded within the Tzolkin:

64 : 260 :: 256 : 1040 or in words:

64, the earths I-Ching is to 260, the earths Tzolkin, as
256, the Suns I-Ching, is to 1040, the Suns Tzolkin.

Has anyone ever constructed a Magic Square of 1040 squares? It might be a very interesting pattern of the Light permutations of the Sun.

Why does the square root of 1024 squares = 32 and not 1040?

55.4 Diagram. Magic Square of the Sun, 16 x 16 The Sun's I-Ching.

Note that the number 52 does not occupy the precise center, but shares it with three other numbers, 77, 181 and 204 and is fractally involved with the Mayan 52 years, 5,200 year cycle and Bodes Law of Sun / Planet distances (5.2), for Jupiter.

This magic square pertains to life (I-Ching), not light (Tzolkin), therefore it is not usable in a Searl configuration.

200

217

232

249

8

25

40

57

72

89

104

121

136

53

168

185

58

39

26

7

250

231

218

199

186

167

154

135

122

103

90

71

198

219

230

251

6

27

38

59

70

91

102

123

134

155

166

187

60

37

28

5

252

229

220

197

188

165

156

133

124

101

92

69

201

216

233

248

9

24

41

56

73

88

105

120

137

152

169

184

55

42

23

10

247

234

215

202

183

170

151

138

119

106

87

74

203

214

235

246

11

22

43

54

75

86

107

118

139

150

171

182

53

44

21

12

245

236

213

204

181

172

149

140

117

108

85

76

205

212

237

244

13

20

45

52

77

84

109

116

141

148

173

180

51

46

19

14

243

238

211

206

179

174

147

142

115

110

83

78

207

210

239

242

15

18

47

50

79

82

111

114

143

146

175

178

49

48

17

16

241

240

209

208

177

176

145

144

133

112

81

80

196

221

228

253

4

29

36

61

68

93

100

125

132

157

164

189

62

35

30

3

254

227

222

195

190

163

158

131

126

99

94

67

194

223

226

255

2

31

34

63

66

95

98

127

130

159

162

191

64

32

33

1

256

225

224

193

192

161

160

129

128

97

96

65

The Franklin 16 x 16 Magic Square Internal Pattern

09/16/02 B.Franklin 16x16 Magic Square Illustration, Courtesy of http://www.envf.port.ac.uk/illustration/z/the/momagic/ms03.htm

Impossible Correspondence Index

Copyright. Robert Grace. 1999