Commentary on the Searl Disk

John's concepts are quite simple. What the rings and rollers represent is a cross-section of a complete system shaped like a sphere with a hole in the middle or a torus. The reason that the rings do not take the shape of a sphere is because the rollers, if they were curved, could not possibly revolve, hence, limiting them to a flat-plane-3 tiered-diameter across an imaginary sphere. The Searl system strips electrons off the atoms (ions) that are drawn into the center of the tori and accelerates them to the outer rim where they are picked up by coils as electricity. The system is as unbalanced and recursive as David Hamel's spinners and Hamel which never lets the system find an equilibrium between plus and minus magnetism. Both Hamel and Searl systems oscillate back and forth as intrinsic magnetism tries to find the center but cannot. Hamel uses 3 cones and Searl uses 3 tiers of rings integrated with magic square configurations which are recursive (nested and ever repeating, never ending) which unbalances the system always. This unbalanced oscillation is defined by science as a "dynamic system" or o-point energy. Once the system is completely assembled, it tries to align with magnetisms nested oscillations which are infinite as far as we are concerned. Magnetism is defined as the Carrier wave of all matter information which is of the 2nd dimension.

In my files, Scientific American Magazine notes that, "electrons are antigravity". If this is correct, then electrons, are equated with a harmonic of the Carrier wave of all information to matter , and are not causing antigravity, but, as you can plainly see , "Are antigravity". Therefore electrons and the Carrier wave have some similar characteristics.

To view atoms as centers of neutrons and protons with electrons orbiting is an error. An advanced theory of an atoms shape will reveal that it is just as nested and recursively toroidal as the intrinsic toroidal shape of nested-toroidal-space. Another theorist, Hemet, of 25 years study, has accurately concluded that nature is basically toroidal, as his pictures show. His Torus Knot Topology pictures are also interesting. Here is a real picture of a real galaxy. The galaxy shown, has an invisible toroidal sphere around it although we can't see it. The jets are following a path through the center hole, as electrons (antimatter) are being thrown off the edge of the spinning disc, just like Searl's machine. These electrons are what science calls the missing matter of universe: "dark matter". The galaxy should also have a matrix of Magic Squares wrapping around the sphere, although we can't see this either. Derek Bond correctly describes how the spiraling toroidal field "... is a new unified field theorem [sic] regarding the functioning of our universe. It describes how stars, mass, time and space and black holes function in our spectrum of the universe." Atomic Vortex Theory. This is not the first Vortex Theory as claimed. Carl F. Krafft, in 1945, developed the Ether Vortex Theory and is covered in these files and is listed in the Bibliography.

Mass current

The Keelynet file, matrixag.asc  implies a mass orientation or polarization and not just a surface phenomena. Dan Davidson indicates that "orientation of orbital electrons in a phased matrix may radically change the structure of the crystal array by altering the quantum effects of the binding energy. The crystal may become a fluid in a quantum sense while retaining the structure of a crystal matrix".

THE Code of Light permutations.

This magic square pertains to light (electrons, Tzolkin) therefore it is usable for a Searl machine. I.magi.ne folding the edges top, bottom, left and right so that the flat squares become a sphere with a hole in the middle, i.e., a torus. This is what this magic square represents anyway. Now place this torus around a Searl disk and figure out what numbers are needed. It should be possible with time spent observing. I.magi.ne a machine that is not a flat ring but expanded to a sphere around which a magic square is wrapped. This machine should operate as a Searl sphere if integrated properly, just as a galaxy does.

Here is Ben Franklin's 8 x 8 Magic Square as Kua (I-Ching hexagrams). This matrix represents

THE Code of Life which occupies the precise center of the above 13 / 20 Mayan Tzolkin.

If you draw a line sequentially from 1 to 64 you will see the double pattern of the permutations of life, represented by each kua, in The Mayan Factor by Jose Arguelles. It is also called The Mind of the Earth, The Van Allen Belts, Psi Bank, Oversoul, World Soul of Plato, Psychic Bank and Sensorium of Harold.

This magic square pertains to life (I-Ching), not light (Tzolkin), therefore it is not usable in a Searl configuration.

If you will connect straight lines between each two numbers of this magic square, sequentially, beginning with 1, you will discover a very ornate, 3-part pattern that should describe the Suns 256 (16 x 16) mind permutations (I-Ching).

This 16 x 16 Magic Square corresponds to the 8 x 8 of the earth, therefore I concluded that it is embedded in what I call a Sun Tzolkin of unknown number. To find that number I divided the earth Tzolkin (260) by the I-Ching 64 (8 x 8) = factor 4.0625, then multiplied factor 4.0625 x 256 (16 x 16), the number of squares in the Sun Magic Square, representing the Suns I-Ching. This gives 1040 squares in the Suns Tzolkin, but, upon taking the square root of 1040 I expected a round number like 32, 32 being the assumed next larger Magic Square (32 x 32), following the binary progression of nature namely 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, but to get 32 as an expected number one has to take the square root of a lesser number, 1024, as the square root of 1040 = 32.24903.

Summary:

The square root of:

The I-Ching, 64, of the earth = 8
The I-Ching, 256, of the Sun = 16
The Tzolkin, 260, of the earth = 16.124515
The Tzolkin, 1040, of the Sun = 32.24903

So it seems these ratios following are appropriate to describe earth and Sun mind, remembering that the I-Ching is embedded within the Tzolkin:

64 : 260 :: 256 : 1040 or in words:

64, the earths I-Ching is to 260, the earths Tzolkin, as
256, the Suns I-Ching, is to 1040, the Suns Tzolkin.

Has anyone ever constructed a Magic Square of 1040 squares? It might be a very interesting pattern of the Light permutations of the Sun.

Why does the square root of 1024 squares = 32 and not 1040?

55.4 Diagram. Magic Square of the Sun, 16 x 16 The Sun's I-Ching.

Note that the number 52 does not occupy the precise center, but shares it with three other numbers, 77, 181 and 204 and is fractally involved with the Mayan 52 years, 5,200 year cycle and Bodes Law of Sun / Planet distances (5.2), for Jupiter.

This magic square pertains to life (I-Ching), not light (Tzolkin), therefore it is not usable in a Searl configuration.

The Franklin 16 x 16 Magic Square Internal Pattern