99.28.1 BULLETIN .. Yonaguni "Pyramid / Temple" ASM-Significant !!!! (Michael Morton) 

Page 28

Sections List- 99 Electrons and Mythologies
Impossible Correspondence Index

In a message dated 07/23/2001,

Michael writes:

Subj: BULLETIN .. Yonaguni "Pyramid / Temple" ASM-Significant !!!!
Date: 07/23/2001
From: (Michael Morton)


Please refer to the below email from Raphiem .. Raphiem@onebox.com

At around 4:15 PM or so .. EDT today .. July 23rd, 2001 .. I worked with the 'below'-noted latitude/longitude coordinates reported to me in an email (arrived earlier today) from Raohiem.

I have found what appear, to me, to be unmistakably-significant "ASM" Grid LAT, Grid LONG, and Grid POINT Value .. for this "temple/pyramid" complex, underwater near Yonaguni Island.

From what I have found, today, plus photos I have very recently seen .. again, courtesy of Raphiem .. I think there is a VERY "ASM"-significant "temple/pyramid" complex there at that site .. and it is certainly, without any question whatsoever .. **ARTIFICIAL**. And it was obviously, (in my opinion), very carefully and deliberately_centered_at the following prominent "ASM"-significant location .....

Grid LAT "Yonaguni Pyramid Complex" .. 24 (deg) X 30 (min) .. = 720 North.

Grid LONG "Yonaguni Pyramid Complex" .. 91 (deg) X 25 (min) X 35.2 (sec) E.Giza .. = 80000 E.Giza. [ E.Greenwich 122 deg 33 min 36 sec ].

Grid POINT Value "Yonaguni Pyramid Complex" .. 80000 / 720 = 111.1111111

Note: 111.1111111 would be, in terms of arc-degrees, the apparent-arc-length-of-movement through our sky, along the ecliptic, of (ideally) 8000 Earth years, at_72_years per (average and ideal) arc-degree, of the Earth precession cycle. This is mentioned in the book, "The Message of The Sphinx", by Graham Hancock and Robert Bauval, as relating directly to the time-period from "Zep Tepi" to the circa 2500 B.C. time when 'final' construction of The Great Pyramid of Giza was apparently "completed".

The "repeating 1s" is a very "ASM"-significant figure, in-and-of-itself. I have identified the_centered_location of what I call, "Tholus II" .. just south of the runways of Stewart Air Force Base in the lower Hudson River Valley in New York State, USA .. as having a Grid POINT Value of .. 1.111111111 .. *Square Root* of the Grid POINT Value I found for "EARTHFACE" of 1.234567901 .. located in Middletown, New York, USA.

I have written extensively of these sites/structures on The Internet over the last few years. And "EARTHFACE", by the way .. again, as I have mentioned_numerous_times on The internet .. is_literally_a *mirror-image* of THE FACE @ Cydonia on Mars.

So .. there you have "Yonaguni Pyramid Complex", and its "ASM" figures, based on the (see below) email report_from_Raphiem.

-- Michael Lawrence Morton

P.S. Thanks to Raphiem !!!! (-;


Subj: Re: And these are extraordinary ..
Date: 07/23/2001 12:32:01 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: raphiem@onebox.com (Raphiem)
To: Milamo@aol.com
CC: CodeUFO@aol.com, bcornet@monmouth.com, Zohshow@aol.com, neil@neilfreer.com, JMason4557@aol.com, T0Leo@aol.com, TomBuoyed@aol.com, Peace2go@aol.com, MetPhys@aol.com, JerryIuliano@aol.com, Raphiem@onebox.com

who ever is saying that these formation are natural needs to seriously re-think .... or go for a dive yourself under there ....!!!

folks download this MPEG video approx 2.5MB windows mediaplayer will play it ...


it is underwater video shoot of the Yonaguni step-temple pyramid ... it goes for a couple of minutes ...

and after you see the steps and sharp block points .... dare you to come back and tell me it is natural ..

natural my ass!!!

i had email correspondence with a Japanese diver who was under their and led me to this mpeg video ... and he has no reason to lie ... it is artificial huge temple/pyramid as he called it, based on the south American step pyramids ...

Michael here are the exact co-ord given to me ... do something with them... 24 30 N, 122 33 36 E

this diver assures me these are the exact according to their GPS

soon ... i will have more pictures .... but i am waiting for more people to come out and tell me it is natural ... i have seen far more structures that looked more natural than yonaguni, being called artificial.... what gives ...?



Milamo@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 07/22/2001 11:31:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time, CodeUFO writes:

I heard the Natural Elements Hypothesis regarding these blocks shortly after they were discovered. I heard it from at least two different geologists on TV specials. I'm not a geologist (although I play one on TV), so I can't say they're wrong. But so far no one has shown me a photograph of any other naturally occurring formations similar to these by which to make even a layman's judgment. Maybe they're right. Maybe they are nothing more than unusual natural artifacts. But where can I see something else like it? If this is a naturally occurring phenomenon then surely there must be examples of this phenomenon elsewhere to be seen. I'm not saying such natural structures don't exist. For all I know, they do. I just want somebody to show them to me. Otherwise, what am I to think?



You're very right to demand that if these geologists say that there "are" examples of this in "nature" .. then we should be SHOWN such examples !! I'll bet there are_NOT_any 'such examples' in the world. If there are ... then .. geologists ... show it to us !!!

-- M.L.Morton


99.28.2 BULLETIN .. Yonaguni, Marsface, Fine Structure, and e .. (Michael Morton) 

In a message dated 07/24/2001,

Michael writes:

Subj: BULLETIN .. Yonaguni, Marsface, Fine Structure, and e ..
Date: 07/24/2001
From: (Michael Morton)

I will have more to say about all of this as time goes on, but this is intended as a kind of "follow-up bulletin" to my previous 'bulletin' regarding the pyramid-complex at Yonaguni.

In an email of at least a week or more, ago, I suggested that maybe an "ideal" Fine Structure Constant (discussed in atomic particle physics, etc.) exists .. which would be an elegant interaction of the number 72 with the Pi constant and powers of 10. I showed this formula in a simple equation .. (Morton, 2001, Internet) as ..

[(72 / Pi Squared) / (10 to the minus 3rd)] = Ideal Fine Structure Constant .. = (72 / 9.869604401) / 1000 .. = 7.295125222 / 1000 .. = 0.007295125222

Its reciprocal is .. (1 / 0.007295125222) =137.0778389

Comparing this with the current experimental laboratory results in trying to "determine" this value .. the current experimental results show the value to be approximately .. 137.036 ..

So ... (137.0778389 / 137.036) = 1.000305313 .. quite close.


"IDEAL" Fine Structure Constant

With ALNITAK of Jan.1, 2000

I found the January1, 2000 "ASM" Grid POINT Value of ALNITAK, in the belt of Orion .. to be .. 43.63323131

[ http://mission-ignition.tripod.com/matrix/ ].

At that webpage .. see my articles on "Sky Matrix" .. at the top of the page. Part One explains how I calculated ALNITAK's Jan.1, 2000 Grid LAT, Grid LONG, and Grid POINT Value .. and how it confirms Mary Anne Weaver's theory that ALNITAK is the ecliptic prime meridian "marker" in our sky.

Using this "Ideal" Fine Structure figure of 137.0778389 ..

(137.0778389 / 43.63323131) = 3.141592653

That's a relatively very precise figure for the Pi constant. I think this is very, very significant, to say the least.


In my previous 'bulletin' email regarding the Yonaguni pyramidal structure, thanks to coordinates emailed to me by Raphiem,

I found its centered Grid POINT Value to be .. 111.1111111 .. repeating 1s. I also found its Grid LAT to be .. 720 .. = 24 (deg) X 30 (min) North.

I found its Grid LONG to be 80000 .. = 91 (deg) X 25 (min) X 35.16483516 (sec) E.Giza. [ E.Greenwich 122 deg 33 min 36 sec ].

Grid POINT Value "Yonaguni Pyramid" .. 80000 / 720 = 111.1111111

Notice the following ...

137.0778389 / 111.1111111 .. = 1.23370055

I will now multiply by Pi .. 7 times ..

1.23370055 X (Pi to the 7th) = 3726.137417 I'll return to a decimal harmonic of this figure, soon.


The 90 arc-deg right angle .. our numerical value for a rotation, or arc, of "half-Pi Radians" in our 360 system .. is seen, now, as the ratio between "Yonaguni Pyramid" and what I call "EARTHFACE" ..

111.1111111 / 1.234567901 = 90.

"EARTHFACE", as I have mentioned many times on The Internet, is the Square of "Tholus II" .. (1.111111111 X 1.111111111) = 1.234567901

There's a decimal harmonic, in-evidence, yet again .. "Tholus II" and "Yonaguni Pyramid".


AN "IDEAL" e Value ?

If there is an "ideal" Fine Structure .. can an "ideal" e Value be far behind ?

Recall the figure from earlier .. 3726.137417 ..

Recall, also, the "Ideal Fine Structure" constant of .. 0.007295125222

(372.6137417 X 0.007295125222) = 2.718263905

I think 2.718263905 can be called the "Ideal e" Value.

Using the Jan.1, 2000 Grid POINT Value (Morton, 2000, Internet) of GALACTIC CENTER .. 35.53057584 ..

(35.53057584 / 372.6137417) X (Pi to the 7th) = 288.

That's an important gematrian number .. double 144 .. and with the classical gematrian 'meaning' of .. "double light". (Also .. see Bruce Cathie's work).

Notice I'm using the number 7, but as an exponential power .. the 7th power of Pi.

I also have found a direct correlation between THE FACE @ Cydonia on Mars, and the 7th power of Pi ..

(372.6137417 X 656.56127) / (Pi to the 7th) = 81.

Yes .. 81 .. the Square of 9.


81 X 1.111111111 = 90, the right angle .. the angle at which electricity and magnetic force (are out of phase- R.G.).

81 X 1.234567901 = 100 .. decimal harmonic of "unity".

I can even write this simple equation, showing the equivalent of the Grid POINT Value of THE FACE @ Cydonia on Mars ...

THE FACE = [(Ideal Fine Structure) X 81 X (Pi to the 7th)] / (Ideal e).

Munck (1992, "The Code") found the Grid POINT Value for THE FACE @ Cydonia on Mars ... 656.56127 .. now notice ..

656.56127 = (0.007295125222 X 81 X 3020.293228) / 2.718263905


So .. you can now see the direct correlation involving what I think are the "ideal" values for Fine Structure and for e, as integrated within the "ASM" .. Archaeo-sky Matrix.

Could this be a reason .. not the 'only' reason .. but a reason .. as to why the number 7 is so historically / culturally important ? It refers to 7 powers of the Pi constant, which is now seen to be an important factor involving Fine Structure and e .. and is displayed as such by the "ASM".

Pi to the Ninth Power

The number 82944 has been written-about by David Leahy, as being important regarding atomic particle physics, etc., and regarding the Fine Structure.

Notice, here, a direct correlation involving the ratio of Ideal Fine Structure and Ideal e ... 372.6137417 ..

(82944 X 372.6137417) / (Pi to the 9th) = 1036.8 = (25920 / 25).

Recall, also, that the Grid LAT of_both_the Church @ Rennes-le-Chateau, and The White House .. is .. 103680 North.

(Morton, 1998, Internet).

Recall the ratio between Jan.1, 2000 SOLAR APEX and Jan.1, 2000 GALACTIC CENTER ..

(35.53057584 / 2.842446068) = 12.5

(Morton, 2000, Internet).

(1036800 / 12.5) = 82944.


Testing "Ideal e" at CYDONIA

Munck's Grid LAT for The D&M Pyramid at Cydonia on Mars is .. 9929.184894 North .. = 40 (deg) X 52 (min) X 4.773646584 (sec) North.

Using the "Ideal e" .. what's the ArcTan of (e / Pi) ?

ArcTAN (2.718263905 / 3.141592654) = 40.86800683 (deg).

How close is that to .. the Grid LAT of The D&M Pyramid ?

Converting that ArcTAN of (Ideal e / Pi) into deg, min, and sec .. = 40 deg 52 min 4.824588 sec.

That's really_very_close to the Grid LAT of The D&M Pyramid.

(4.824588 - 4.773646584) = 0.050941416 arc-sec of latitude on Mars.

How many feet is that (on Mars, remember) ?

An arc-sec of latitude on Mars is about 54 feet, or so.

So .. 54 X 0.050941416 = Approximately 2.75 feet.

That's about .. "one walking step for an Earth Human". (A slow walking-step, for an average adult Earth Human). Maybe Stan Tenen could relate to that .. in terms of "human form / activity" .. regarding sacred geometry, etc.

In fact .. 2.75 feet is fairly close to .. e feet, you know ?!


From: TomBuoyed
Date: July 24, 2001
Subj: Testing "Ideal e" at CYDONIA


Good work here. But what if you took the actual e / pi ratio to compare it?

actual e/pi = 0.865255979 arctan(e/pi) = 40.86819376

Converting to dms: 40* 52' 05.49753312"

Subtracting Munck's value from the seconds 04.773646584" gives

0.723886536" or 39 English feet on Mars.

Then subtracting your "ideal" value of 4.824588" from the actual value, you get

0.6729" or about 36 feet difference.

This may be coincidence, but what immediately struck me about the numbers 36 and 39 is the comparison of the English yard with the meter as expressed in inches.

36 inches in 1 yard and 39.37007874 inches in 1 meter

The ratio of a meter to a yard is 1.093613298, which is like a Pythagorean comma between the metric and the English measuring system. And is it just coincidence that we use the same symbol ' for both feet and minutes and " for both inches and seconds?



THE YEAR 2000 A.D. ...


The number 5760 is a factor in what I called, "The Cydonia/Giza Equation" (Morton, 1998, Internet). It relates the 3 main Giza pyramids to THE FACE and The D&M Pyramid @ Cydonia on Mars. Here it is again ..

656.56127 X 27.58106915 X 5760 X (Pi Cubed) .. = 248.0502134 X 5764.166073 X 2261.946711

The "sky" portion of the "ASM" aligns_at_Jan.1, 2000. The year 2000 A.D. is therefore self-evidently important in the entire "ASM", including both the ground-locations and the sky-locations.

{ http://users.cwnet.com/~sidereal/mag/astfixst.htm }

(72 / 372.6137417) X (Pi to the 9th) = 5760.

Recall, now, the figure 230.4 .. which is the multiplied-product of the *Mars Variance* in prime meridian longitude.

(Morton, 2000, Internet).

I found that the "ASM" prime meridian on Mars .. is west of the "NASA" prime meridian on Mars by .. 09 deg 32 min 0.8 sec .. and (09 X 32 X 0.8 = 230.4)

Notice .. (82944 / 230.4) = 360 .. the number of arc-degrees on one circumference in our "conventional" system of geometry.

(5760 / 230.4) = 25 .. which is the multiplied-product of the Orion Belt Composite and Pi ... (7.957747155 X 3.141592654) = 25.

I found the Jan.1, 2000 "Orion Belt Composite" by multiplying ALNITAK and MINTAKA, and then dividing that result by ALNILAM ..

(43.63323131 X 31.00627668) / 170.010936 = 7.957747155

(Morton, 2000, Internet).


I also found this relationship involving the number 80 ...

If you take any number .. and divide it by the_ratio_of Ideal Fine Structure and Ideal e .. and then multiply that result by (Pi to the 9th) .. you get a figure of 80 times the numerator.

You saw that we did that with the number 72. 72 X 80 = 5760.

Try it with 81 as the numerator, and, of course, with 372.6137417 as the denominator ...

(81 / 372.6137417) X (Pi to the 9th) = 6480.

That's the multiplied-product of THE FACE @ Cydonia and (Pi Squared). (656.56127 X 9.869604401) = 6480.

And .. 81 X 80 = 6480.

Michael Lawrence Morton (c) 2001


99.28.3 BULLETIN .. Yonaguni, Marsface, Fine Structure, and e .. (TomBuoyed) 

From: TomBuoyed
Date: July 26, 2001
Subj: 80/81 --> Pythagorean Comma


All you have found about 80 & 81 indicates that you have stumbled into the realm of musical harmonics and the famous Pythagorean Komma which is expressed in the fraction 80/81 which equals 0.98765432 0987654320.... Rounding it off to 9 decimal places, which is the most we really need, you get 0.987654321.

This ratio arises from the fact that if you take a stringed instrument, like a guitar or violin and tune it by major 5ths, called "just tuning," then it will take you 12 cycles of going up by 5ths before you reach an octave note. Actually, it will be 7 octaves above the original note.

However, the note you reach by the 5th tuning will be slightly off from the actual octave tuning.

Mathematically it is expressed by the fraction (3/2)^12

3/2 is the fraction increase in frequency of the tone. For example, if you start at middle C, 256 cps, the 256 x 3/2 = 384, the natural frequency for the 5th or the note of G.

When you multiply 3/2 by itself 12 times you get the fraction 531441/4096, which in decimals is 129.7463379

That number is close to the real C note which is 7 octaves above middle C.

It would be expressed as 2^7 =128

You see how the 7th octave reached by the 5th method is slightly higher than the 7th octave reached directly. That difference is called the "Pythagorean Komma," since Pythagoras and his boys were the first to discover it.

If you take the ratio 129.7463379/128 you get 1.013643265.

This is why stringed instruments can never be tuned with a piano, for example.

So there are many compromises musicians make, one of them being this 80/81 ratio, which arises out of the combination of 2 ratios in a certain tuning scale, ratios which you have brought up in your ASM calculations. They are 10/9 and 9/8.

10/9 = 1.111111....

8/9 = 0.888888....

Also 100/81= 1.234567901

If you divide 10/9 by 9/8, you get the fraction 80/81 = 0.987654321

Its inverse is 80/81 = 1.0125, which is a good approximation to the bigger Pythagorean Komma I outlined above. Anyway, this ratio is sort of a "classic" or natural Pythagorean Comma and to designate it I use the English spelling Comma.

Now the bigger issue here is the fact of these very slight discrepancies which arise in all your ASM calculations. The ancients saw 12 as the number of Being while 7 was the number of Becoming. When you put the two together, they don't quite mesh, just as you have found with Munck's data on the number e, base of natural logs, a number that you just wrote of as an "ideal" e.

So I think it's crucial for us now to start looking at these slight discrepancies because they mean something important in the scheme of things, especially if we accept the idea that the universe is musically ordered. (That's the deeper lesson of Quantum Physics, since quantization is by natural and rational numbers and that's how music and chemistry work.)



From: Michael:

Tom ...

How interesting !! I've heard OF the Pythagorean Comma .. but I hadn't recalled it AS the (80 / 81) ratio !!! This is a very good confirmation, I think, of the reality of part of the "basis-in-nature" of the "ASM".

I've figured "EARTHFACE" .. in Middletown, NY .. to have a Grid POINT Value of 1.234567901 ... kind of like an "inverse wave form expression", in a way .. of the 9.87654321 ... get my drift ? That might not be technically the right expression .. but it's the idea.

"EARTHFACE" has a Grid LONG of 25920 W.Giza, as you may recall from some previous emails of mine. (According to the work I did in 1998 regarding Dr. Bruce Cornet's discoveries in that part of the lower Hudson River Valley).

I really hope that 'someone' eventually seriously investigates that site .. and also "Tholus II" and "D&M II" in the same vicinity. (Cydonian analogues). Seriously. As you might recall, I have the "ASM" figures for those sites, too, which I found from studying the official USGS topo maps.

-- M.L.Morton


From: MetPhys
Date: July 24, 2001
Subj: 80/81 --> Pythagorean Comma

In a message dated 7/26/1 2:19:03 AM, TomBuoyed wrote:

"The ancients saw 12 as the number of Being while 7 was the number of Becoming. When you put the two together, they don't quite mesh, just as you have found with Munck's data on the number e, base of natural logs, a number that you just wrote of as an "ideal" e.

So I think it's crucial for us now to start looking at these slight discrepancies because they mean something important in the scheme of things, especially if we accept the idea that the universe is musically ordered. (That's the deeper lesson of Quantum Physics, since quantization is by natural and rational numbers and that's how music and chemistry work."


I'm glad you have a working knowledge of music and the intrinsic understanding to recognize that there is a "discrepancy" of the Pythagorean comma within the music of universe. I will be the first to listen carefully if you decide to follow the musical trail, relating music to quantum physics, constants, astronomy, the Archaeo-sky Matrix, relationships of Mars and chemistry.

We know there is impossible correspondence between music and these sciences but it is not so evident. For those who may not be aware of it, the Ancient Science was the integration of all the modern segmented divisions of science today, with music, as you see in the Pythagorean comma.

Impossible Correspondence


From: MetPhys
Date: July 25, 2001
Subj: 80/81 --> Pythagorean Comma

To All,

More info about the "discrepancy" you are encountering and what I call the "gap" between the Real World (object) and the Actual World (reflection of the object).

Overview: http://www.bakemania.com/djoseroverview.htm

A quote from Bakeman:

"Under ideal circumstances Pi would presumably have a value of exactly 3. In other words, the diameter of a circle should ideally wrap around its circumference precisely three times with no remainder or shortfall. But in the terrestrial environment this value is "warped", and as a result has taken on a vexatiously irresolvable nature."


From: http://hometown.aol.com/MetPhys/91notes.html

0.3 The Real Mediator

It is found that Newton's prism 'gap' experiment seems to represent the 'Mediator' between "This Side" and the "Other Side" of universe or the Dorian scale raised 2/3.


From: http://hometown.aol.com/MetPhys/91notes.html

0.27 Number 9

At http://Geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Lab/1135/rodin.html

Marko Rodin's site, last Diagram,

"The 24 steps of the cycle...", a commentator describes a circuit of 9 numbers: two doubling circuits and a gap circuit. The gap circuit is admitted to be unknown in function."

I submit the gaps are akin to Buckminster Fullers "bowtie 9' in book, Synergetics, and to Gurdjieff's Scale Structures.

9, 1, 1*, 2, 3, 5, 8*, 4, 3, 7, 1*, 8, 9, 8, 8*, 7, 6, 4, 1*, 5, 6, 2, 8*, 1

* = gap being the Rodin sequence, which, when superimposed with my sequence:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

meaning 1 and 9 of the latter, could be 0 or a center around which oscillates a 'bowtie' of 4 numbers on each side c/o B. Fuller. Gurdjieff adds his Scale Structure by saying that "the 3 and the 7 gaps (implying musical note) are filled in by new octaves of other orders".

My conclusion is that Marko Rodin's sequence of numbers is simply:

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1 or

-4, -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3, +4......

the back and forth oscillation around a neutral point. This is called 0-point energy.


From: http://hometown.aol.com/MetPhys/90hyperphys.html

In File, 28 Phi and The Other Side, Doczi has made a Diagram, which I have, which shows the "discrepancy" between Phi "Other side", .618


and musical interval (.666 or 2 : 3, diapente, 5th) equaling 0.048. Could it be, that we are missing connecting with the "Other side" by a mere .048 decimal or its musical ratio equivalent, probably connected to light?

And what is that ratio? Divide 2 by 3 in ratio 2 : 3 and you get .666. What ratio or its fractally harmonic ratio equivalent, is equal to .048? Would such a ratio have to be raised to power 2 / 3 as Newton plainly shows us?

After trying many ratios, I came up with two that may help you get started thinking. Of course these may be modified to align with other constants and ratios: (5 / 2)^2 / 128 = .0488281 and (6 / 5)^10 / 128 = .0483729.

128 is the number of magic squares in the 'highest' 7 level World.

Or consider these ratios and numbers of Thomas Hightower, Part II

http://home3.inet.tele.dk/hitower/octave2.html (56 full page scrolls):

Pythagoras' Comma

"Comma means in Greek, incision. It alludes to the little rest that arises from the 7 octaves and the 12 fifths in the acoustic, mathematical calculation of the 12 chromatic notes in an octave. In the 7 octaves span the 12 fifth's does not fit completely, they are about 23.5 cents bigger. (Cents are a logarithmic unit commonly used in acoustics, see part I) The ratios in vibrations are stated in dictionaries as 524288 : 531441 or approximately **80 : 81**.

I show, in Helmholtz's Complete Tone Table, this same "discrepancy" within his detailed octave breakdown, as a separation of two musical notes listed. The "discrepancy", between the "Other side" (Phi, real world, .618) and "This side" (Fibonacci Series, reflected world, .666<<< interesting) is, in my files, called the "Gap", "Real Mediator" and the "Dorian Scale of Newton raised to power 2/3"

In its elegant simplicity but little understanding, religion calls it light.

Impossible Correspondence


From: CodeUFO
Date: July 26, 2001
Subj: 80/81 --> Pythagorean Comma, "The Discrepancy"

This is in response to The Discrepancy discussion. I know most of you on this list are competent "math men", an area in which I'm not very knowlegable. That said, however, I've found myself confronted by the kind of things being discussed in "The Discrepancy" as a result of my work in alphanumerics and my interest in the phenomenon of synchronicity. My work keeps turning up numbers related to things such as are being discussed here. So I thought I'd offer the following in case anyone might find it to be of interest. What follows is an article from a series I wrote for the CAUS web site last year. I brought this out of mothballs (and added a few incidental notes) because in the the "Discrepancy" discussion two items popped up which had come up in my alphanumerics work: 1) Marko Rodin, and 2) "gap-space" sequences. While it may seem that alphanumerics and the English alphabet may have little or no connection to the kinds of ideas and "hard math" being discussed in the Discrepancy, I think you may see after reading this that it just might after all. At the very least it can be thought of as just one more item in what we might call the "interconnectedness" of all things. The attached graphic is referenced in the article.

THE CODE ZONE: Reality Outside The Box
(No.6) A Weekly Column By Gary Val Tenuta

This week's installment asks the question:
"Is This How Sacred Symbols Are Born? "

Throughout history humans have graced their perceptions of "reality" with graphic symbols representing all kinds of concepts. Many of these symbols represent spiritual or religious ideas. The Ankh, the Cross, the Star of David, the Hebrew Tree Of Life, are a few of the symbols many of us are at least somewhat familiar with. How do these symbols develop? I haven't looked into that question but a recent series of synchronistic events gave me some idea of how, in some cases, such symbolic forms might have come about. It began one night after reading an email from a research associate, Joe Mason. http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm

Suffice to say that email was part of a thread of several previous emails to and from various members of the Code Gang, now known as the Code Consortium. This burst of previous correspondences entailed a mind boggling collage of ideas, discoveries, and speculations all related to things like "The Code", DNA, Fibonacci number sequence, Qabalah, the Tree Of Life, and much more, all seemingly somehow interconnected by the mystery of numbers and letters. This information had been transpiring in a flurry over a period of a week or two and suddenly it all came swirling into my mind at once. That's when it hit me.

This idea flashed into my mind that we (the Code Consortium) were developing a new gematria from several perspectives: Carl Munck's Code work, Michael Morton's brilliant extensions of that work, Jimi Furia's musical concepts related to the Code, Joe Mason's Dream / Synch / Cropcircle contributions, my alphanumerics work, and other bits and pieces that come floating in from other sources such as Marko Rodin.

We've been relating a lot of the results to traditional Greek and Hebrew gematria and Kabalah and well we should because the connections are there. But it seemed clear that something else was developing here. Could we call it a new Gematria? Of course whatever it is, what ever we call it, it has been in the process of developing for a long time. Blavatsky, Crowley, Greenfield, Hulse, and others I'm sure I've never heard of, were setting the wheels in motion long ago. But as I thought about this it seemed as if we were continuing that process and discovering new elements, new pieces to the puzzle. And, thinking of the Kabalah, it occurred to me maybe the traditional Tree Of Life has been waiting for a companion. I knew the traditional Kabalists would string me up for sure, but what was I to do? The image shown here, came to me in a single flash of inspiration and I couldn't ignore it. I was going to call it the Tree Of Transition but the words, THE CODE TREE popped into my head and I liked it. Besides, the alphanumeric value of THE CODE TREE equals 108, a good gematrian number (THE SPIRAL=108, GEOMETRY=108 and, if you saw the previous installment of the CodeZone you'll recall how significant the number 108 is to the goddess pentagram at Rennes Le Chateau). The Code Tree, it turns out, encompasses one whole heck of a lot of really curious "coincidences" relating to this whole notion of an encoded reality. It's too much to go into here but the following is a very brief explanation of some of its elements.

The Code Tree is based on the number 9 which is the foundation of my work in what I call cryptonumerology. The path by which the numbers flow from bottom to top just happened to create a central "trunk" comprised of the numbers 3, 6, and 9. This seemed very synchronistic since one of the email correspondences mentioned above was about a recent discovery by a researcher named Marko Rodin (Marco Rodin's Toroid Sunflower Map (doubling+3, 9, 6, etc. gap sequence


It has to do with the method of "cross-adding" multidigit numbers, such as 34 for example, to reduce them to a single digit. In the case of our example we see 34 reduces to 7 by adding the 3 to the 4. Rodin showed that a repeating pattern of numbers is derived by the method in the cross addition of the powers of two (1, 2, 4, 8, etc.). The repeating pattern is:

1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5 (If you didn't follow this, each number in this series is twice the number just before it. The 7 comes from 8+8=16, then cross-adding 1+6=7. The 5 comes from 7+7=14, then 1+4=5)

Notice the numbers 3, 6, and 9 are missing. The missing numbers are thought to be a "gap space" pattern, related to the torus spiral, the shape of which, I'm told, is governed by the Fibonacci sequence. It also happens that in my discovery of the patterns within our alphabet

(http://members.aol.com/codeufo/gematria.html ),

these patterns produce the exact same series, 1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5, except they are in "alpha-form" (ONE, TWO, FOUR, EIGHT, SEVEN, FIVE) and with the exact same 3-6-9 gap spacing. That is to say, the words THREE, SIX, and NINE are missing. Can this possibly be mere coincidence? The odds would seem astronomical.

Now, regarding the rest of the Tree, the numbers outside the circles are the reduced sums of the alphaforms of the number inside the circle. For example, ONE=34=7.

Here's something else of interest: In the series of what I call "alpha-numbers" (i.e., the word forms or "alphaforms" of the numerical digits), "ONE" thru "NINE" there are only three of the alpha-numbers which reduce to 6: FOUR(60), FIVE(42), and NINE(42). Here is the entire series with the reduced value in parentheses:

ONE=34 (7)
TWO=58 (4)
THREE=56 (2)
FOUR=60 (6)
FIVE=42 (6)
SIX=52 (7)
SEVEN=65 (2)
EIGHT=49 (4)
NINE=42 (6)

So, in the entire series, these three give us the infamous 666. Interestingly, the multi-digit values (60, 42, and 42) total up to 144, classic Hebrew gematria for "light". 144 also happens to be the alphanumeric value of the phrase, THE GOD OF ISRAEL, using the straight serial alphanumeric code of the English alphabet (A=1 through Z=26). As you can see, the 459 presents itself as a triangle on the Code Tree (It's interesting, from a synchronicity standpoint, to keep in mind that I didn't "plan" any of this. It just "happened".) The numbers 4, 5, and 9 have some other correlations when their order is changed to 549. Check out the alphanumeric value (ANV) of this phrase:


Also, as shown on my web site


the "word forms" of the numbers 1 thru 9 (i.e., ONE thru NINE) fall into three groups according to the number of letters in each word in the Group:

Group-1 (3-letters): ONE-TWO-SIX
Group-2 (4-letters): FOUR-FIVE-NINE
Group-3 (5-letters): THREE-SEVEN-EIGHT

I noticed the 666 was encoded in Group-2 as FOUR-FIVE-NINE (see above for explanation). And, as noted above, FOUR(60) + FIVE(42) + NINE(42) = 144 = THE GOD OF ISRAEL.

So I thought if the antichrist (or negative attribute) is represented in this 1-through-9 number series, then it would seem likely that the opposite, or the "positive attribute" would be represented also. But, unlike the negative attribute in which we are given the number to look for as an identifier (i.e., 666), we don't necessarily have a specific number to look for as an identifier for the positive attribute. So what was I to do? Well, I thought, there are only three groups in the series so let's see what we find. I decided to try Group-1 first just because its the 3-letter group and 3 can be interpreted as representing the three-in-one God concept. Seemed like a likely shot. Interestingly, Group-1 produces the same value as Group-2. Here's what we find:

ONE(34) + TWO(58) + SIX(52) = 144

the same result as Group-2:
FOUR(60) + FIVE(42) + NINE(42) = 144

So, Group-1 and Group-2 might be seen as representing the two sides (or the dual nature) of the one God, Jehovah, or some related archetypal idea. Interestingly, the ANV (AlphaNumeric Value) of JEHOVAH is 69, the Yin/Yang sign symbolizing the concept of opposites-in-one or "dual nature".

Also there is this, based on NINE=42:

60+9=69(6) = JEHOVAH

And speaking of dual nature, note the following:


This is because JESUS and LUCIFER share the same ANV (74), again symbolic of the dual nature of the singular spiritual entity.

JEHOVAH(69) + SPIRIT(73) + JESUS(74) = 216

same as:
JEHOVAH(69) + SPIRIT(73) + LUCIFER(74) = 216

(216 is also considered a significant gematrian number, not to mention my discovery that the equivalent alpha-numbers, TWO + ONE + SIX = 144. In addition to this, according to Carl Munck's earth grid matrix of the ancients, the precise Grid Latitude of Stonehenge is 21600, a base ten harmonic of 216.)

NOTE: Related to the number 216, my friend and Code Consortium member, Joe Mason, once wrote to me the following. It has been excerpted from it's original context but the information is relevant here. Joe writes:

"The opponent force is symbolized by Typhon-Set, Satan, Shiva, and his consort, Kali, who is also the harlot of Revelation 17. The most connected "beast" number in my coincidences is 216 (6 x 6 x 6). It is related to the "penultimate letter" (21st) of the Hebrew alphabet, which looks like a Trident (meaning "three teeth"). [I have to insert a note here. Notice the reference to "Trident" which relates to "3" which was brought up in the Discrepancy discussion and we can see it relates to the triune god-head idea also. And Joe mentions the 21st letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The number 21 reduces to 3. - Gary] It is related to "fire" in the sense of a purification process (Joshua is said to be a brand plucked from the fire in Zecharah 3). It is also, surprisingly, related to the "Holy Spirit." Also surprising, 216 is related to the secret and lost Name of God that must be spoken in the Holy of Holies by the High Priest."

Continuing on now:

Looking at the reduced ANVs of the three groups (or, the entire series of ONE thru NINE), notice there are five numbers missing: 1, 3, 5, 8, 9. 1+3+5+8+9 = 26; the number of letters in our alphabet and also the ANV of the word GOD(26).

26 comes up again when the numbers used to identify or "name" each Group (i.e., 1 and 2 and 3) are multiplied by the number of letters in each "alphanumber" assigned to that Group and then the results added together:

Group -1: 1 x 3(letters) = 3
Group-2: 2 x 4(letters) = 8
Group-3: 3 x 5(letters) = 15
3 + 8 + 15 = 26

On my web page, http://members.aol.com/codeufo/gematria.5a.html , I've presented a long excerpt from my book, The Secret Of Nine, describing my concept of the number 9 being a symbol for the idea of "transition". There you will see this idea as it relates to the merging of two levels of the traditional Kabalah Tree Of Life, to form what is known as a "Jacob's Ladder", where the sepheroth number 9 merges into that portion of the Tree known as "the abyss". On our Code Tree, the idea of transition is also present. You'll notice the Code Tree begins at the bottom with "0". (This is because, in the system I've been working with, there is essentially no "10", since 10 is just 1 again, starting off a new series of 1 thru 9. This idea is the key behind the whole concept of the eternal spiral. I won't bother to launch into a full explanation here, but it is pretty well explained on my web site.)

(Side Note of interest here: ZERO IS THE DIVINE NUMBER=261. This is the same series of digits as mentioned above in the discussion about the number 216. Interestingly, the difference between the two numbers is 45, the sum of the numbers 1 through 9.

The Code Tree reaches it's peak at number 9. But the whole idea here is that there is no beginning or end. So one tree connects with another at the zero point. This establishes a continuous growth in either direction. For convenience, I have only shown two Trees connected but you can see how another could connect at the bottom of the Tree shown in black and at the top of the Tree in blue ad infinitum. Now here's where the alphanumeric element of the transition comes in. Where the Trees connect, the sepheroth numbers, on the diagonal (following the yellow brick road!) are 198. This is the alphanumeric sum of THE RESURRECTION; definitely a form of transition! Also, it is the sum of THE GOLDEN MEAN SPIRAL.

One last item: As mentioned above, the sum of the numbers 1 thru 9 is 45, which, you'll notice, reduces to 9. But here's the amazing thing: The reduced sums of the alpha-numbers ONE thru NINE also equal 45! What are the odds of that? And again, this reflects the 4-5-9 idea, in that 4+5=9. Is this more evidence that some sort of encoding mechanism has been infused into our alphabet? And if so, who did it, how was it done, and why? Or... is all just meaningless coincidence?


From: MetPhys
Date: July 27, 2001
Subj: 80/81 --> Pythagorean Comma


Ratio 524288 : 531441 or approximately 80 : 81

Do you see a forward 288 in the left ratio?
Do you see a backward 144 (441) in the right ratio?
Is there an implied 2 : 1 ratio inherent within the two?
Cross-adding 524288 = 2+9 =11
Cross-adding 144135 = 1+8 = 9
Cross-adding 80 = 8
Cross-adding 81 = 9
Can we now say 8 : 9 :: 9 : 1? (8 is to 9 as 9 is to 1)
Can we now say 8 : 9 :: 9 : 11? (8 is to 9 as 9 is to 11)
Does it imply anything more than pure chance?
Should we know better by now?



In File, 80 Shining Stranger, we ask,

"The question is: How many beginnings (intervals) symbolized by (o) are necessary to define a Nichomachean "point" or to give it "actual being"? Or how many intervals (o) are required to draw the configuration of the positive sign (+), which appears to answer the problem of the product of "zero divided", and also define a point?"

5 is the minimum intervals (o) which will completely secure 1 point (o) between 2 opposing lines or forces:

If 5 is the measure of 1, defined, 1 cannot measure the same in every direction, therefore, concerning light:

80.21 Light (3 + 2 = 5)

If a distorted one-direction ray of kinetic space called light, (Book: 530.1 M314), moves perpendicularly through another distorted one-direction ray of space, it manifests light as the result of the interaction, as follows but this is only the 2nd power-flat-surface depiction of light. Lights 3-dimensional (x^3) spherical path is around a sphere which it forms as the waves intersect at 90 degrees on its spiraling path as Bruce Cathie's Light Diagram (David Wilcock), (11 full page clicks) exactly like Marko Rodin's (7 full page clicks) two reversed logarithmic spiraling waves of his Sunflower Map Diagram, the two of which, agree perfectly.


Within this same file we see the formula of light quanta after the Bible parables:

"If two or more are gathered in my name, there AM I (1), in the midst" .... or in math...

3/2 x 2/3 = 1 light quantum, or

"there shall be 5 in 1 household, 3 against 2 and 2 against 3"

What is the 2/3, 3/2 unit? It seems to be two neutrinos. And what did Harold say Light was made up of? Was it 3 + 2 = 5 attributes? ...

Actually it's 6 neutrino attributes that looks like 5 equaling 1 quantum unit of light, but what does 3 + 2 = 5 have to do with 80 : 81 or 524288 = 2+9 =11 and 144135 = 1+8 = 9.

Impossible Correspondence

Page 28

Sections List- 99 Electrons and Mythologies
Impossible Correspondence Index

Copyright. Robert Grace. 2001