**99.86.1 Electro-gravity Equations (Iuliano)**

Subject: Electro-gravity Equations

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Date: Sat, August 14, 2004 12:16 pm

Sir:

The unification of the two long range fundamental forces..( electro-magnetic through the fine-structure constant..aem = 1/137.03599971... , and Newton's Euclidian constant for gravity...Gn = 6.674205043...* ( 10 ^ - 11 ) k/m/s )..is directly through the electro-magnetic parameters, which are E...the permittivity of space or the electric constant; h.... the Planck quantum limit for vibrations; and c ....the speed of light metric, meters per second. The equation for fine structure constant...aem... has been known for 90 plus years:

aem = 1 / 137.03599971... = ( e^2 ) / 2 / E / h / c

...where

aem = fine-structure constant = 1/137.0359997...

e = elementary charge = 1.60217646 * ( 10^-19 ) C

E = permittivity of space = 8.854187818 * ( 10^-12 )

h = Planck's constant = 6.62606874 * ( 10^-34 ) J

c = speed of light m/s = 299792458 m/s

..the formula for the gravitational constant ..Gn... is about 50 years old and is represented by the heaviest mass allowed in Nature the Planck mass..Mp:

Gn = h * c / 2 / Pi / ( Mp^2 )

...where

Mp = Planck mass = 2.176449594 * ( 10^-8 ) kilograms

Gn = gravitational constant in newtons = 6.674205043 * ( 10^-11 )k/m/s

The two equations only have h and c as commonalities...Multiplying the two forces as product results in the form:

Gn * aem = ( e^2 ) / 4 / Pi / E / ( Mp^2 )

...this is the reduced form, a strange mixture of mass and permittivity of space and electronic charge...a mongrel of an equation , no relevant meaning, needs simplification..

The new gravitational equations shows that there is a more simple reduction than the 50 year old equation and it shows deep symmetry to the electro-magnetic form of the fine-structure constant factors....the only difference between the two equations is the energized (squared) electron volt ( geometrically a surface area). The fractal dimensioning of the light unit c is the key mystery here...from the fine-structure constant, cancel out the energy(area) of the electron volt...divide by the elementary charge squared...e^2... then one-tenth (Rybo) of this result...attach to the light speed unit EXACTLY...( 4.1 ) fractal dimensions creates exactly the 2002 NIST gravitational constant for Gn = 6.6742..*( 10^-11 ) k/m/s

.2 * E * h * ( c ^ 4.1 ) = Gn = 6.674205043 * ( 10^-11 ) k/m/s

...as compared to the fine-structure constant..aem:

( e^2 ) / 2 / E / h / ( c ^ 1 ) = aem

...this equation does reduce to unification upon product with Gn..

PLANCK MASS FORM

Gn * aem = ( e^2 ) / 4 / Pi / ( Mp^2 ) / E

NEW GRAVITATIONAL FORM

Gn * aem = ( e ^ 2 ) * ( c ^ 3.1 ) / 10 ( Rybo )

....then it can be demonstrated:

Gn = ( e ^ 2 ) * ( c ^ 3.1 ) / 10 / aem

aem = ( e ^ 2 ) * ( c ^ 3.1 ) / 10 / Gn

Gn * aem = ( e ^ 2 ) * ( c ^ 3.1 ) / 10 = ( e ^ 2 ) / 4 / Pi / ( Mp^2 ) / E

4.87040271 * ( 10^-13 ) = 4.87040271 * ( 10^-13 ) = 4.87040271 * ( 10^-13 )

....where does the fractal dimensioner 3.1 come from...it pops out of ten !!!!! ....3.1 DOES NOT reduce from the Planck mass equations ..it is a separate independent entity!!! and yet the equations are exact...The fact that the addition of ten in the denominator absorbs Planck mass squared, the permittivity of space and Pi is amazing...both gravity and fine-structure constants are electronic volts in disguise...

J.Iuliano

**99.86.2 Electro-gravity Equations (MetPhys)**

Subject: Electro-gravity Equations

From: rgrace@rgrace.org

To: JerryIuliano@aol.com

Date: August 16, 2004

Sir,

A few preliminary questions, please, before the main point:

**1.** "both gravity and fine-structure constants are electronic volts in disguise..."

**Note:**....which requires high voltage to affect it?

**2.** "fractal dimensioner 3.1..."

**Note:** What can a fractal dimensioner be? Fractal dimensioner 3.1 and 4.1 may reveal added dimensioners 1.1, 2.1, x.1, x.1, 5.1, 6.1, 7.1, 8.1, 9.1 and 10.1, in time, representing 1-10 triplet spirals of the superstring Anu. Each (.1) decimal attachment may be 1/10th part of 10 triplet spirals.

See omega .3 and .7 parameters below, the Anu (GIF) and the UPA-Ultimate Physical Atom, Figure 3, bottom. Each (.3) decimal attachment and the (.7) decimal attachment may be 3/10ths and 7/10ths parts, respectively, of the full 10 triplet spirals of the superstring.

**3.** omega m = .3 = the density parameter for mass--vacuum

omega Cc = .7 = cosmological constant parameter

**Note:** This reminds me of the 3 heavy spirals and 7 light spirals on the

- Anu (GIF)
- atom
- superstring
- Besant/Leadbeater anima
- UPA-Ultimate Physical Atom, Figure 3, bottom

**4.** 99.85.1 W and Z subatomic bosons and gravity (Iuliano)

**Note:** What does "double log" imply?( log(logGN+12) = emev^2 ) .......The (+/-)12 probably indicates the 12 spheres of one 13-sphere (empty-center) gravity unit. Double log may indicate that it takes two 13-spheres (26D) to communicate empty-center-gravitic-information (0D scalar) between them. These spheres are none other than clusters of our (UPA- Ultimate Physical Atom/BesantLeadbeater anima/Anu/superstring). Do gravity units also come in pairs like Cooper pairs? Since 12 spheres are of a higher order than the required 11 dimensions before total order comes out of chaos.....we can ask.....is gravity the first sign of total order? MP

From Iuliano:

**On 168024000**

99.85.3 Cosmological Constant and 288 (Iuliano)

...if Gn is considered a function of the electron...emev = .510998918 mev:exact

10 ^ (( 10 ^ ( emev ^ 2 )) - 12 ) = Gn

....then the right side of the cosmological constant is a rational integer !!!

Gn * Pi * 8 / 3 / ( c^2 ) = 168024000 / ( 288^14 )

...note the 14 ...( strong force = a(s) = 14 )... powers of 288 in the denominator. This integer 288 can feed back into the cosmological constant equation through the gravitational constant Gn:.... x = -2.88001077

(((( 8 / 3 ) ^ x ) ^ x ) ^ x ) = Gn

(((( Gn ^ ( 1/x )) ^ ( 1/x )) ^ ( 1/x )) = 8 / 3

From Phillips:

**On 168024000**

We are definitely on the border of strangeville. At first, I thought that the number 168024000 was Phi, but with a closer look, it isn't. However, 168024000 has commonalities with Phillips numbers 168 and 1680, which are involved with superstring theory, which name, superstring, happens to have other names, such as

- Anu (GIF)
- atom
- superstring
- Besant/Leadbeater anima
- UPA-Ultimate Physical Atom, Figure 3, bottom

Let's search Phillip's pdf's (1-4 of 12) for superstring numbers based upon the tetraktys and occult studies of the ultimate physical particle UPA (Ultimate Physical Atom/BesantLeadbeater anima/Anu/superstring):

Iuliano's number: **168**024000

Article02.pdf, Phillips: " Each whorl is a closed curve in fact a helix with 1680 circular turns called 1st-order spirillaeȘ "

Article02.pdf, Phillips: " Average number of yods (including centres) in 1st 4 solids (type A) = 168 "

Article02.pdf, Phillips: " The number value of Cholem Yesodeth, its Mundane Chakra (the cosmic aspect of Malkuth) is 168. This is spectacular confirmation of the validity of Leadbeater's micro-psi observation of the UPA, in whose whorls he counted 1680 1st-order spirillae (the factor of 10 reflects the ten-fold, Tree of Life character of each helical whorl as the microscopic manifestation of one of the ten Sephiroth). "

Article02.pdf, Phillips: " Number of yods in 5 solids not corners of type B tetractyses other than polyhedral corners = 1680. "

Article03.pdf, Phillips: " 1680 yods (including 50 polyhedral corners) surround the centres of 5 solids other than corners of tetractyses. "

Article03.pdf, Phillips: " Each whorl is a helix in which Leadbeater (Besant/Leadbeater/anima/Anu) counted 1680 circular turns. "

Article03.pdf, Phillips: " I identified the UPA with the superstring constituents of up and down quarks and showed how the number 1680 a structural parameter of the superstring is encoded in the Tree of Life and is mathematically defined by the ten Godname numbers. "

Article03.pdf, Phillips: " The kernel 168 of this structural parameter of the superstring constituents of quarks is in fact the number value of Cholem Yesodeth (lit.: "breaker of the foundations"), the Hebrew name of the Mundane Chakra of Malkuth, which is the physical, cosmic manifestation of this Sephirah. "

Article04.pdf, Phillips: " The (6+6) enfolded polygons have 168 yods along their boundaries outside their root edge. In other words, 168 yods create their shape (84 in each set of 6). This is remarkable, because 168 is the number value of Cholem Yesodeth (lit. "breaker of the foundations"), the Mundane Chakra of Malkuth (Mundane Chakras are the astronomical bodies traditionally associated in Kabbalah with each Sephirah; the Mundane Chakra of Malkuth is the planet Earth). "

And one more:

Article06.pdf, Phillips: " The 12 trees extending beyond the 29-tree to the 41st tree have 72 SLs and the 28 trees extending beyond the 1-tree to the 29th tree have 168 SLs. This 72:168 differentiation corresponds in the superstring described by Besant and Leadbeater to the 72 E8 gauge charges carried by the superstring in its three major whorls, 24 spread out over each whorl, and to the 168 gauge charges similarly carried by the superstring in its seven minor whorls. As we shall find later, each set of 24 gauge charges corresponds in the inner form of the Tree of Life to the 24 unshared corners of the first six regular polygons enfolded in each tree of the 10-tree. "

**Note**: The ratio above, 72 : 168, when divided on each side by 24, i.e., 72 / 24 = 3 and 168 / 24 = 7, is the 3 : 7 ratio of the single Anu.

MP

rgrace@rgrace.org

**99.86.3 Mind to Matter Equations (Iuliano)**

Subject: Mind to Matter Equations

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Date: Sun, August 15, 2004 12:45 pm

Sir:

The Feigenbaum delta constant...Fd = 4.669201609... is defined as the length between bi-furcation nodes as dynamic structures devolve into chaos. One tenth of this length...Fd/10... interacts with the weak nuclear nuclear force, represented by the mass --energy of the carrier sub-particle bosons , W and Z and their coupling constant , Fermi-coupling charge...Gw.... In the formula, the mass--energy of the proton is as denominator to the main contributor on the cut. Interesting to note the W and Z particle forms cancel out the (c^2) factor...(c=light speed) to become a pure dimensionless "weighted" ratio as an exponent to the Feigenbaum length...Fd/10. The inverse of this weight attaches to the electron mass--energy "weight"...emev.. with the result shrunk by one-tenth squared:

(( Fd / 10 ) ^ ( W / Z )) / pmev / ( emev ^ 2 ) ^ ( Z / W )) / 100 = Gw

...where:

Fd = Feigenbaum delta constant = 4.669201609...exact

Z = sub-particle boson = 91.20272669 Gev/(c^2) ....exact

W = sub-particle boson = 80.4 Gev/(c^2)....exact

emev = electron in million electron volts = .510998918mev...exact

pmev = proton million electron volts = 938.272029mev....exact

Gw = weak force = Fermi-coupling charge = .00001166402883...exact

The equation shows the interesting things that the "weighted" exponent ...W/Z... or ..Z/W.. does to the Feigenbaum length. W/Z exponentially attached to the Feigenbaum length creates the electron mass...

Since:

( Fd / 10 ) ^ ( W / Z ) = emev

...then it can be demonstrated:

emev / pmev / ( emev ^ ( Z / W )) / 100 = Gw = fermi-coupling charge

This equation shows a "raw" electron , divided by a proton, divided by an electron, tweaked by the "weight" of the W/Z ratio, divided by Prof, Leahy's conceptual " thinking, NOW, created 100" , equals the coupling charge for the W and Z bosonic particles. The mathematical fact that the electron is equivalent to the Feigenbaum length by the weight ratio of the W and Z bosons means that the electron is symbolically "organized(W/Z)...chaos (Fd)" . This also means that the proton is a derivative of the W, Z bosonic masses through their own charge coupler..Gw, holographed to the electron:

pmev = emev / Gw / ( emev ^ ( Z / W )) / 100

This equation further reduces to a single "tweaked" electron:

pmev = ( emev ^ (( W - Z ) / W )) / Gw / 100

...the exponent...( W - Z ) / W...is a percentage to volume ratio between two weights similar to moisture ( wet density ) and subtracted moisture ( dry density ) formulas from the science of soil mechanics:

( wet density - dry density ) / dry density = percentage of moisture to volume

The W and Z bosons can be thought of as Z = total volume with weights reflected as a percentage of total volume for each boson W and Z weighted, respectively.

Two differences from the density equation:

1..W-Z is a negative number

2...the divisor W is the lessor number

By analogy to the moisture equation, the weight difference between W boson(wet density) and Z boson(dry density) can be shown as total volume...80.4 minus grater volume...91.2.., divided by the lessor volume...80.4 equals .134362272% ...percentage NEGATIVE SPACE relationship !!! The exponent that tweaks the electron to create the proton is simply a negative extracted volume to total volume percentage relationship between the W and Z particles. This infers that the Z particle is the whole entity and the W particle is a subset of the Z particle whole. The relationship between the extracted forms creates the proper weight as exponential percentage to the electron as a factor of the proton energy. That is, the exponent...( W - Z ) / W )... is defining the NEGATIVE SPACE that exists between the W and Z particle....80.4Gev is extracted from the whole 91.2Gev.

**Note**: Is 91 the "whole"? Quote, Article05.pdf, Phillips:

" CTOL (The Cosmic Tree of Life) itself is analogous to the UPA in that its 91 Trees of Life correspond to the 91 co-ordinate variables of the ten strings of the UPA/superstring in superstring space-time. "

Back to Iuliano: The weights W and Z are just tools to derive the real value that attaches to the electron, the negative space that is created when one subtracts the W weight from the whole Z weight. In summary the electron taken to the power of the negative extracted space of the bosonic particles...( W - Z ) / W, then divided by the coupling constant for these two bosons...Gw = fermi coupler...creates the mass energy of the proton:

emev = ( pmev * 100 * Gw ) ^ ( W / ( W - Z ))

Interesting to note that the value of the exponentially, weighted attachment to the electron, is a mental construct, a percentage to the negative space, it becomes dimensionless, becoming a NEGATIVE SPACE power to the real coefficient electron. To use real weights in two forms as exponentials on the electron...( W - Z ) or ( W / Z ) ...gives meaningless data. By blending the two forms...( W - Z ) / W... one loses real weight values to become a mental observation of the negative space by percentage that occurs when the W particle is distilled out of the total volume allowed by the Z particle. This means that the electron is not responding to the actual particle weights themselves, but to the IDEA of a symbolic space (dimensionless) that occurs when the W boson is subtracted out of the whole Z particle, leaving not a simple real subtraction...( W - Z )..., but the IDEA of COMPARISON to the act of subtraction from the whole. The electron is a real particle, but the exponent...( W - Z ) / W ... is a "mental" particle or the concept that the mind can interpret subtraction data that cancels out the real values for imaginary concepts that are as yet derived from data.

Interpretation....the reactive body (electron) creates the real body (proton) by the abstract notion of weighted forms as a dimensionless representation, or ( W - Z ) and ( W / Z ) real weights transformed to dimensionless "weights"...( W - Z ) / W ... equals the percentage of negative space from the extraction of W from Z. Of most interest is the fact that the real electron does not react to the real values of the W and Z particles, but only reacts to a mathematical thought process that can transform real weighted objects into dimensionless symbolic objects. This doesn't mean that the real particles W and Z are not important, for their real values create the relevant data, however the electron does not use them to transform into the proton, it uses instead the sentient idea of the CONCEPT of COMPARISON between the two particles, which paradoxically means the electron both uses and then NOT uses the real weights of the W and Z particles as it transforms into the proton. The electron only uses the percentage of unity (God) minus the ratio of the two bosons, W and Z. to create the proton....

( emev ^ ( 1 - ( Z / W )) / G w / 100 = pmev

...without unity the equation is meaningless.

J.Iuliano

**99.86.4 A Testable Dual-Frequency Solution (MetPhys)**

Subject: A Testable Dual-Frequency Solution

From: rgrace@rgrace.org

To: Jerryiuliano@aol.com

Date: Thu, August 19, 2004 12:45 pm

Sir:

I have a question about the mathematics of Bayles:

This info is in Bayles document Original Version

A Testable Dual-Frequency Solution For the

Electrogravitational Action Mechanism (Verified) by Jerry E. Bayles

Gravitational Research, Medford Oregon

July 07, 2004

Abstract:

Recent theoretical investigations into possible frequency constants associated with the main form of my electrogravitational equation shown below have led to some testable results involving the predicted frequency constants associated with the associated force constant that connects all particles through non-local energy space to a frequency constant associated with the vector magnetic potential (A vector) in local normal space. The predicted main frequencies are dual in the sense of one being connected to the local space electromagnetic realm and the other connected to the quantum space realm and both share the same wavelength although they are orthogonal to each other. The cross product of the local space electromagnetic frequency with the quantum non-local space frequency creates a third vector 90 degrees to them both and when each are provided with the appropriate units, creates a third vertical vector which yields vertical action power. Further, the frequency associated with the force constant may be related to sub frequencies which are found by multiplying the main frequency by the fine structure constant, each result also being multiplied by the fine structure constant, etc. The main Electrogravitational two-system equation is shown below.

**Note**: After Bayles defines several old and new constants and parameters, we find this, about a phi relationship:

"Taking the derivative with respect to the Avec time of the momentum (Amom) develops a negative force vector 90 degrees to the force constant F QK and the resultant atan of the ratio of the force constant to the force resultant of the derivative of the Amom is equal to the angle of rise of the side of the Great Pyramid. This suggests that the geometry of the Great Pyramid is tapping into the energy space associated with the force constant. **If the time related to the frequency of the force constant is multiplied by 4 and this time is used in the derivative of the momentum vector (Amom) with respect to time, a force is arrived at that is shown below to have a ratio equal to the negative of the square root of the golden ratio as was shown above. This suggests that an even multiple of 4 times the force constant time (when expressed as a rate of change of the Amom with respect to that time) interfaces with the force constant at a ratio equal to the square root of the golden ratio**."

**Note**: Since he mentioned phi in his calculations, I became very interested, as phi has always been associated with gravity, in my mind, from the beginning. The problem is this: No matter what I do, I can't repeat the mathematical steps required, to arrive at Bayles conclusions. I wonder if you understand what the method of Bayles is?

Back to Bayles: "The perimeter of the Great Pyramid can be set equal to 2 pi on a side which is 8 pi total circumference. The height is then equal to 4. Thus the height to 1/2 the length of a side is equal to 4/pi. This is extremely close to the square root of the golden mean. The pi from the center of the base to the middle of a perimeter side and the height (4) are 90 degrees to each other. In a previous paper, "EGPhoton.MCD," I investigated the concept of the actual electrogravitational capacitive and inductive reactance values being 1/2 pi and 2 pi respectively of the quantum ohm. Please view at:

I have also previously presented the concept that quantum action is similar to waveguide or transmission line action wherein the time related to propagation is equal to the square root of the product of the inductance and capacitance. On the other hand, the square root of the product of the inductance and capacitance values does require a multiplier of 2 pi when solving for time and thus frequency of resonance in an ordinary LC circuit configuration."

MP

rgrace@rgrace.org

**99.86.5 A Testable Dual-Frequency Solution (Iuliano)**

Subject: A Testable Dual-Frequency Solution

From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Date: Tue, August 24, 2004 8:55 pm

An interesting discovery concerning phi...1.61803398875... and the electron mass and energy ratio can be demonstrated as follows:

Letting:

electron energy in million electron volts = emev = .510998918 mev

electron mass in grams = egms = 9.109382148 * ( 10 ^ - 28 ) gms

...the conversion of electron mass into energy can be shown as:

egms * ( c ^ 2 ) / ( 10 ^ 9 ) / e (one electron volt) = emev

...where using 2002 NIST values:

egms = 9.109382148 * ( 10 ^ -28 ) grams = electron mass

emev = .510998918 million electron volts = electron energy

c = speed of light in meters/second = 299792458 m/s

.037 pn = radius of hydrogen atom

E = permittivity of space = 8.854187818 * ( 10 ^ -12 )

E = ( 10 ^ 7 ) / 4 / Pi / ( c ^ 2 )

e = elementary charge = one electron volt = 1.602176461 * (10^-19) C

Pi = 3.141592654...

...using the eleventh dimension of the hydrogen radius....037 ^ 11 ... one can express both electron mass and electron energy as:

ELECTRON ENERGY...emev:

.08 * ( .037 ^ 11 ) / e / ( E ^ 3 ) / ( Pi ^ 3 ) / ( c ^ 4 ) = .5109989229 mev

ELECTRON MASS...egms:

32 * ( .037 ^ 11 ) / ( E ^ 2 ) / ( Pi ^ 2 ) / ( c ^ 4 ) = 9.109382235 * ( 10 ^ - 28 )gms

...putting into a ratio the two forms...egms / emev...results in:

9.109382235 * ( 10 ^ - 28 ) / .5109989229 = 400 * e * E * Pi

...the 128th root of this ratio equals phi - 1 :

( 400 * e * E * Pi ) ^ ( 1 / 128 ) = .618050519...

...of which phi - 1 = .61803398875...

...a simplification of this form using only the elementary charge and the speed of light:

(( 10 ^ 9 ) * e / ( c ^ 2 )) ^ ( 1 / 128 ) = .618050519...

...using the energy conversion formula...energy = mass * ( c ^ 2 ) ... one can show that the 128th power of ( phi - 1 ) is really a mass in grams in disguise:

1 billion electron volts = ( .618050519 ^ 128 ) * ( c ^ 2 )

...the 128th root is related to the horizon areas (A) of black holes through the entropy formula:

S = A * ( 1/ 4 ) * sqrt h * Gn....such that:

((((( sqrt h ) * Gn ) / 4 ) ^ ( 1/ 128 )) + 2 ) / 10 = .511000634 ^ 2 = emev ^ 2

...where

h = Plancks constant = 6.62606874 * ( 10 ^ - 34 ) J

Gn = gravitational constant = 6.674201104 * ( 10 ^ - 11 )

....black hole entropy formula from Lee Smolin's book " THREE ROADS TO QUANTUM GRAVITY" , page 90...

J.Iuliano

Sir:

The extraordinary abilities of the integers of the collective unconscious ratio...144/37... to perform mathematical functions can be demonstrated by this linkage to phi...1.61803398875...through the unification of the three angular measuring systems, degrees, gradients and radians. Both degrees and gradients can describe the phi function through integers:

DEGREES...360 degrees in unit circle:

cos 72 = 1 / (( sqrt 5 ) + 1 ) = .3090170944...

GRADIENT....100 units in circumference of circle:

cos 25920 = 1 / (( sqrt 5 ) + 1 ) = .3090170944...

RADIANS....180/Pi:

cos 70.999993971 = 1 / (( sqrt 5 ) + 1 ) = -.3090170944...

...the radian form is not an integer...70.999993971... What is this values derivation? Amazingly the 144 and 37 integer forms derive this function:

cos in radians:

cos (( 14.4 - 37 ) * Pi ) = - 1 / (( sqrt 5 ) + 1 ) = -.3090170944...

....144 is the 12th number of the Fibonacci series...1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144...55+89 = 144. Thus 144 and 37 shortcut to the actual value of phi without using the infinite ratios of the Fibonacci series. The sum of inverse quark masses are related to these forms:

( 1/u ) + ( 1/d ) + ( 1/c ) + ( 1/s ) + ( 1/b ) + ( 1/t ) = 354.9999699...

....where 354.9999699 / 113 = Pi

...from Brian Greene's book " THE ELEGANT UNIVERSE " page 9 the quark masses are measured in unit proton masses ( pm )

up quark = u = .0047 pm

down quark = d = .0074 pm.....used in formula .00739856126491...

charm quark = c = 1.6 pm

strange quark = s = .16 pm

bottom quark = b = 5.2 pm

top quark = t = 189 pm

...such that:

cos in radians:

cos ((( 1/u ) + ( 1/d ) + ( 1/c ) + ( 1/s ) + ( 1/b ) + ( 1/t )) / 5 ) = -.3090170944

J.Iuliano

**Note:** Jerry also included two other pages of phi information which can be found in past emails, so they are not included here. Pssst...I was hoping he would do Jerry Bayles math formulae ....

MP

rgrace@rgrace.org

**99.86.6 Planck mass black holes (Iuliano)**

Subject: Planck mass black holes

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Date: Sat, August 28, 2004 11:10 am

MP:

The Planck mass is derived from an integer:...( 55 )

Mp = Planck mass = 2.176449594 * ( 10 ^ -8 ) kilograms

The formula is very simple: c = light speed = 299792458 m/s

( c ^ -.55 ) / ( 10^3 ) = Mp

....other derivatives are: using , c ^ -.55

Gn = h * c / 2 / Pi / ( Mp^2 ) = 6.674205043 * ( 10 ^ -11 )...exact to 2002 NIST

...uniting fine-structure constant and gravitational constant...aem and Gn... the two long range fundamental force constants:

aem * Gn = ( e ^ 2 ) * ( c ^ 3.1 ) / 10

...where:

e = elementary charge = 1.60217646 * ( 10 ^ -19 ) C

h = Plancks constant = 6.62606874 * ( 10^-34 ) J

aem = 1/137.0359997...

Using the double log form with (c^-.55) the electron calculates to:

sqrt( log( log Gn +12 )) = emev = .510998977mev...2002 NIST = .510998918mev

The other Planck forms are:

Planck mass = Mp = ( c ^ -.55 ) / ( 10^3 ) = 2.176449594 * ( 10 ^ - 8 ) kilograms

Planck length = Lp = h * ( 10^3 ) / 2 / Pi / ( c^.45 ) = 1.616243355*( 10^-35 ) meters

Planck time = Tp = h * ( 10^3 ) / 2 / Pi / ( c^1.45 ) = 5.391207524*( 10^-44 ) seconds

....55 is a Fibonacci number.....

J.Iuliano

**99.86.7 Electrogravity update (Iuliano)**

Subject: Electrogravity update

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Date: Mon, August 30, 2004 7:07 pm

Newtonian constant of gravitation

Value 6.6742 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

Standard uncertainty 0.0010 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

Relative standard uncertainty 1.5 x 10-4

Concise form 6.6742(10) x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

fine-structure constant

( http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?eqalph|search_for=fine-structure+constant )

Value 7.297 352 568 x 10-3

Standard uncertainty 0.000 000 024 x 10-3

Relative standard uncertainty 3.3 x 10-9

Concise form 7.297 352 568(24) x 10-3

elementary charge

Value 1.602 176 53 x 10-19 C

Standard uncertainty 0.000 000 14 x 10-19 C

Relative standard uncertainty 8.5 x 10-8

Concise form 1.602 176 53(14) x 10-19 C

Planck constant

Value 6.626 0693 x 10-34 J s

Standard uncertainty 0.000 0011 x 10-34 J s

Relative standard uncertainty 1.7 x 10-7

Concise form 6.626 0693(11) x 10-34 J s

electric constant

( http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?eqep0|search_for=electric+constant )

Value 8.854 187 817... x 10-12 F m-1

Standard uncertainty (exact)

Relative standard uncertainty (exact)

Concise form 8.854 187 817...

Mp:

This is an update using exact values from NIST:

aem = fine-structure constant

aem = ( e ^ 2 ) / 2 / E / h / c = 1/137.0359991...

...such that:

.2 * E * h * ( c ^ 4.1 ) = Gn = 6.674205594 * ( 10 ^ -11 ) (m^3)/kg/(s^2)

...uniting gravity and electromagnetism:

aem * Gn = ( e ^ 2 ) * ( c ^ 3.1 ) / 10

E = electric constant = permitivitty of space = 8.854187818 * ( 10 -12 )

c = speed of light = 299792458 m/s

These equations are without precedence in simplicity and accuracy.

J.Iuliano

**Note:** Sir,

I've never seen the symbol for light velocity (c) raised to a power other than (^2). Are there other instances anywhere in mathematics, where (c) is raised to .45, 1.45, 3.1, 4.1 or -.55? What do these fractional and negative values imply?

MP

rgrace@rgrace.org

Subject: Re: From MP: What is.....?

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Date: Wed, September 1, 2004 7:44 pm

MP:

It is a mystery to me also. Although the accuracy of these rational numbers is important to their relevance...

J.Iuliano

**99.86.8 Re: Question: Rotating Magnetic Field or Not? (J.Bayles)**

Subject: Re: Question: Rotating Magnetic Field or Not?

From: j.e.bayles@att.net

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Date: Wed, August 25, 2004 10:42 pm

Hello, Robert:

I have answered your questions in the body of your letter below.

-------------- Original message from : --------------

> Jerry,

> A Russian Forum friend claimed that the Faraday monopolar disc nor the earth has rotating magnetic fields.

> Have you arrived at the same conclusion?

> I then asked how does a common motor armature rotate if not dragged around by the rotating field?

> Who is correct?

Answer:

I consider that the magnetic field has a group and phase velocity, much like the electromagnetic field that a changing magnetic field can create. Therefore, the velocity in the direction of the field is equal to the phase velocity which would be the square of the velocity of light divided by the group velocity. I propose that the group velocity is what I have termed in previous works on electrogravitation as being the least quantum velocity which is equal to the square root of the fine structure constant and is expressed in meter/sec units.

To be consistant, all magnetic fields should have a group velocity limit which is orthogonal to the direction of the field equal to the square root of the fine structure constant in meter/sec units. Interestingly, the fourth power of the least quantum group velocity times the magnetic permeability of free space is in magnitude extremely close to Newton's gravitational constant.

As for the 'motion of the field of a motor', the field does not rotate. Rather, the field 'sequences' in steps of distance along the perimeter of the stator and the rotor follows or chases the strongest field position. The motion is an illusion concerning the field of the stator since it is simply a stepped sequence of windings having the next maximum field.

Respectfully,

Jerry E. Bayles

j.e.bayles@worldnet.att.net

Electrogravity (Jerry Bayles)

=============================================

>In reference to:

99.85.4 Question: Rotating Magnetic Field or Not?

> Met

> rgrace@rgrace.org

**99.86.9 Question: Fractional Powers Notation ^1.45, ^.45, ^3.1, ^-.55 (MetPhys)**

Subject: Question: Fractional Powers Notation ^.45, ^1.45, ^3.1, ^-.55

From: rgrace@rgrace.org

To: Jerryiuliano@aol.com

Date: Mon, Sept, 13, 2004

Sir,

D.A.White uses fractional notation, example: (f = +/- (.5)^.5) as you are doing... ^.45, ^1.45, ^3.1, ^-.55. My question is this.

Compared to D.A.White's calculation: If (Dg, dimensionless velocity factor) is around 10^-2 (corresponding to a near-relativistic velocity of just under .01 c) what are these equivalent to:

1. c^.45, written as ((c + .45) /100)

2. c^1.45, written as c x (45/100)

3. c^3.1, written as c x 3 x (1/10)

4. c^-.55, written as ((c x -55) /100)

5. Can ^1/2 be replaced with your ^.5 or ^.50, as follows:

Reference Frames, Negative Velocity, and the Uncertainty Principle by Douglass A. White, Ph.D.

The photon that must interact with the proton in order for an observer to "see" it at that spatial resolution accelerates the proton to at least 631 m/s faster (or slower) than its prior velocity. Suppose that we narrow the gap in which we try to pin down the proton's location, reducing it to 10^-17 m.

* 1.054x10^-34 kg m^2 s^-1 / (10^-17 m)(1.67x10^-27 kg) = 6.31x10^9 m/s.

The proton's minimum velocity uncertainty -- just the minimum difference in velocity -- now appears to be faster than the speed of light. If the proton was at rest relative to us when we looked at it with this level of resolution, we had to hit it with such a high-energy photon to see it that the proton is now going close to light speed. If it was going at that speed, then we at least stopped it, and perhaps even caused it to recoil. As the proton pushes into relativistic speeds, its mass starts to change appreciably, so we can no longer treat the mass as a constant. We have to add a relativistic term to our mass that adjusts it according to its relative velocity. In other words, a certain minimum portion of the momentum must take the form of a relativistic increase in the mass of the proton so that its relativistic speed stays below (c).

* Mprel = Mp / (1 - (v/c)^2)^1/2).
**Can this be written, replacing ^1/2 with your ^.5, as follows**

* Mprel = Mp / (1 - (v/c)^2)^.5).

However, since the proton rest mass (Mp) remains constant, we can move it over to the "constant" side of our relation and put it together with Planck's constant.

(Delta x) [Delta v / (1 - (v/c)^2)^1/2)] >= h-bar / Mp
**Can this be written, replacing ^1/2 with your ^.5, as follows**

(Delta x) [Delta v / (1 - (v/c)^2)^.5)] >= h-bar / Mp

Since our speed (v) is relativistic, we can write it as a fraction (f) of (c).

*Delta f c / (1-(f)^2)^1/2 = c (Delta f / (1 - (f)^2)^1/2
**Can this be written, replacing ^1/2 with your ^.5, as follows**

*Delta f c / (1-(f)^2)^.5 = c (Delta f / (1 - (f)^2)^.5

We use (Dg) as a token to represent the whole expression (Df / (1 - (f )^2)^1/2). (D.A White's notation).

Theoretically this number (Dg) can take any value we like that is greater than zero and less than infinity, and it's just a dimensionless number that tells us about the velocity relative to (c). Our number (Dg) has the value of unity when f = +/- (.5)^.5 = +/- .7071 (D.A White's notation)....

Note that (f) can be either positive or negative, implying positive or negative velocities. Negative values of (Dg) produce imaginary values of (f), and we will not play with those in this article. But (c) is a constant, so we can extract it from our Heisenberg relation's left side and move it over to the right side.

* (Delta g) (Delta x) >= h-bar / Mp c.

It turns out that the cluster of constants that we now have on the right is the Compton radius for the proton, (2.1x10^-16 m). It is also known as the proton's de Broglie radius. This is one of several universal quantum mechanical ratios that describe constant units of distance.

The Compton/deBroglie wavelength for the proton is 1.32x10^-15 m. The electron's Compton/deBroglie wavelength is 2.43x10^-12 m, and its Compton/de Broglie radius is 3.86x10^-13 m. So by studying Heisenberg's relation we discover that the displacement (Dx) for a proton (or an electron) will always be a reciprocal of (Dg) that is quantized by the respective Compton/de Broglie radius (or wavelength.)

MP

rgrace@rgrace.org

**99.86.10 Now the Virtual Half! (MetPhys)**

Subject: Question: Now the Virtual Half!

From: rgrace@rgrace.org

To: Jerryiuliano@aol.com

Date: Wed, Sept, 23, 2004

Sir,

This is not the end of the study. Its only the half-way point.

We have arrived at the end of "This Side" with studies of "gravity", "W and Z particles" and "neutrinos". However, from knowledge of the "virtual" world and ambidexterious music, we understand that the virtual "Other Side" is not a mirror image of what we have already measured. The virtual is two dimensional rotations away from what we have studied. It's calculated values are also two dimensional rotations from the values we have found so far. These new calculations must be both "backward (1)" and "upside-down (2)", according to the two-dimension rotation. This may also mean that there is a limit of 91.00 Gev/(c^2) and the values become less, meaning the added sums of both sides sum to 9 or its hundreds multiples...or that 91.00 is the median between even higher Gev/(c^2) over 91.00.

Let's get started.

Quoting from File 150 Fitzpatrick's "A" Laws:

* All the forces have a common origin.

* All the forces have identical properties.

Einstein failed because there is indeed an extremely simple unified principle with unified "A" laws and special terms for these laws but there is no single, particle type, unified field. There is a big difference between a unified principle and a unified field and you will see why we can have one without the other.

In addition to all this, as you probably already know, none of your scientific rules work in the microcosm. All your scientific rules must be kept out of the microcosm and above that magic level of Planck's constant.

The only things that work below the level of Planck's constant are the gauge theories of quantum mechanics. In quantum mechanics, the essential tool scientists use to predict are local gauge invariance which gives the theory a type of symmetry that governs the math.

You have to ask yourself why our scientific rules cannot be used in the microcosm and our "A" Laws will show you why.

Both local gauge invariance and therefore this symmetry change drastically with spin/orbit particle-frequency levels: For instance, you have different gauge invariance and symmetry in QCD than you have in QED and, of course, a different symmetry means that you use different math in QCD than you do in QED.

You use QCD to study quarks. You use QED to study the behavior of the electrons that build up the various atoms.

Later our "A" Laws will make it perfectly obvious to you why this must be this way.

Here's the advantage of the "A" Laws: While quantum theory divides up the study of quarks and electrons into QCD and QED respectfully, the "A" Laws also divide all particle levels into something similar to quantum mechanics' local gauge theories except by using the "A" Laws you use the same laws and same terminology for each different spin/orbit particle-frequency level.

At this point the reader will question this and say that if you use the same laws and same terminology then you don't need different levels.

Ah, but you do because each different wave-particle level will be at an entirely different spin/orbit-frequency and this my good friends is primarily a wave and frequency universe.

Met

rgrace@rgrace.org

© Copyright. Robert Grace. 2004