**99.87.1 82944 and the weak-mixing angle (Iuliano)**

Subject: 82944 and the weak-mixing angle

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Date: Wed, Sept. 22, 2004 7:49 pm

STANDARD MODEL

HARMONIC 82944...18

( sin^2 theta W * 5/9 *10 ) ^ (( Pi * Z / W ) - Pi ) / proton = Gw

ELECTRON....emev = .510998918 mev

( sin^2 theta W * 5/9 *10 ) ^ - Pi = emev

.......... 82944 / 576 = 144 82944 / 2304 Aztec Alautun..time = 36 degrees of rotation on the dodecahedran 82944 / 2304 / 2 = 18.............

............. To isolate the down and up quark spins ...5/9...12 is the dodecahedron.........

( log ( log Gn + 12 )) ^ ( 1 / - 2 / PI ) / 10..Rybo = 5 / 9 * wma

wma = .222887292...

http://luth2.obspm.fr/Compress/oct03_lum.en.html

Neutrino Measurement Surprises Fermilab Physicists Batavia, Ill. Scientists at the Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory have found a surprising discrepancy between predictions for the behavior of neutrinos and the way the subatomic particles actually behave. Although the difference is tiny, it is the kind of inconsistency that makes the hair stand up on the back of a physicist's neck, because it could be the first sign of something that profoundly changes our picture of nature. Experimenters at Fermilab's NuTeV (Neutrinos at the Tevatron) experiment measured the ratio of two types of particles-neutrinos and muons-emerging from high-energy collisions of neutrinos with target nuclei. The results of generations of particle experiments with other particles have yielded precise predictions for the value of this ratio, which characterizes the interactions of particles with the weak force, one of the four fundamental forces of nature. For other elementary particles, including the quarks and electrons of ordinary matter, the predictions seem to hold true. But, to the NuTeV experimenters' surprise, when they looked at neutrinos with comparable precision, neutrinos did not appear to fall into line with expectations. "We looked at a quantity that physicists call 'sine squared theta W,'" said NuTeV physicist Sam Zeller, a graduate student from Northwestern University.

"It tells us the strength of the interaction of neutrinos with the Z boson, one of the carriers of the weak force. The predicted value was 0.2227. The value we found was 0.2277, a difference of 0.0050. It might not sound like much, but the room full of physicists fell silent when we first revealed the result."

The NuTeV result gets physicists' attention because it doesn't quite fit the Standard Model, the very precise theoretical picture that physicists have developed to explain fundamental particles and forces and their interactions. In particle physics, such "misfit" results are often the harbinger of new particles, new forces and new ways of seeing nature. The experimenters reported a three-sigma discrepancy in sin^2 theta W, which translates to a 99.75 percent probability that the neutrinos are not behaving like other particles.

"Our picture of matter has held true for thirty years of experimental results," said Fermilab Associate Director Michael Shaevitz, a NuTeV cospokesperson. "With the NuTeV result, it's possible we may have stumbled across a crack in the model. As yet, we don't know the explanation, but we believe it may foreshadow discoveries just ahead at accelerator laboratories."

NuTeV collaborator Kevin McFarland, assistant professor of physics at the University of Rochester, emphasized that the NuTeV measurement would not be so striking if the experiment had not achieved an extraordinary level of precision, unprecedented for a neutrino experiment of its kind.

"Because we examined the interactions of millions of neutrinos and antineutrinos, their antimatter counterparts," McFarland said, "we determined that there is only a one in four hundred chance that our measurement is consistent with the prediction. Unless this is a statistical fluke, it looks as if neutrinos may really behave differently from other fundamental particles. Further, experimenters using the Large Electron Positron at CERN, the European Particle Physics Laboratory, recently measured this same neutrino interaction in a different particle reaction. They saw the same discrepancy we found, although with less precision. The consistency between these two very different measurements is striking." The elusive neutrinos carry no electric charge and "feel" only the weak force, which is a hundred times weaker than the electromagnetic force. As a result, neutrinos rarely interact with each other or with other particles, making them extremely hard to detect. Physicists designed the NuTeV experiment in order to observe the interactions of millions of the highest-energy, highest-intensity neutrinos ever produced. Starting with a proton beam from Fermilab's Tevatron, the world's highest-energy particle accelerator, experimenters created a beam of neutrinos directed at a giant particle detector. The detector itself was a 700-ton sandwich of alternating slices of steel and detector. As the beam passed from the first to the last slice, one in a billion neutrinos collided with a target nucleus, breaking it apart. After the collision with a nucleus, the neutrino could either remain a neutrino or turn into a muon, a particle that is a heavier cousin of the electron. When NuTeV experimenters saw a nucleus break up, they knew a neutrino had interacted. If they saw a particle leaving the scene of the collision, they knew it was a muon. If they saw nothing leaving, they knew a neutrino (invisible to the detector's "eye") had come and gone. The NuTeV scientists measured the ratio of muons to neutrinos and compared it with the predicted values, which other experiments have verified to a part per thousand accuracy for other particles. A painstaking years-long analysis of the NuTeV data revealed the unexpected discrepancy. The 45-member NuTeV collaboration-small on the scale of today's particle physics experiments-operated for 15 months in 1996 and 1997. Rochester's McFarland presented the measurement at an October 26 seminar at Fermilab. The collaboration has submitted the results to Physical Review Letters for publication. The collaboration included physicists from the University of Cincinnati, Columbia University, Fermilab, Kansas State University, Northwestern University, the University of Oregon, the University of Pittsburgh and the University of Rochester. The research was supported by the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. "This wouldn't be the first time that neutrinos have surprised us," said Northwestern's Zeller, noting recent evidence for a small mass in the ghostly particles found by the millions in every gallon of space in the universe. "Their pervasive presence in the world around us means that even very subtle properties of neutrinos have profound implications for the way the universe works."

Fermilab is operated by Universities Research Association, Inc. under a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy. Judy Jackson Fermilab

____________________________________

* _Images of NuTeV _

(http://www.fnal.gov/pub/presspass/image/NuTev_images.html)

* _More information about NuTeV and this Result _

(http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~ksmcf/NuTeV/)

82944 and the Fermi-lab result

If the new Fermi-lab number for the weak-mixing angle...(.2277..) stays true and the current form for the Standard Model calculates by sin-squared theta W theory, to .2227 which is correct only at primitive energies ...sin-squared theta W form...then Prof. Leahy's harmonic number ...82944...rules without peer. The latest value from the Fermi-lab NuTev experiment gives .2277 as centerline value...which can be shown as a function of cosine inverse fine-structure constant through the master harmonic number, 82944...

WEAK MIXING ANGLE = wma = .2277020676......NuTev fermi-lab = .2277..

FINE-STRUCTURE CONSTANT = aem = 1/137.036000986..

....then it can be demonstrated:

82944 ^ wma = ( 10 / Pi ) + 10

...fine-structure constant as cosine in radians:

( 82944 ^ ((( 82944 ^ wma ) - 10 ) / 10 )) / 100 = cos 1/aem = cos137.036000986...

(( cos 137.036000986 ) * 100 ) ^ ( 10 / (( 82944 ^ wma ) - 10 )) = 82944

The primitive values calculate from two possible sources, the negative space of the transformation of the electron into a proton:

electron = emev = .510998918 mev

proton = 938.272029 mev

Gw = .00001166402583 F/m = fermi-coupling charge for W and Z

W = 80.4 Gev

Z = 91.20272669 Gev.........( 91.19 + -.007..fermi-lab = 91.2
Gev )

( emev ^ ( 1 - ( Z / W )) / Gw = pmev * 100

...which is the inverse square root of the weak-mixing angle.. sin-squared-theta W... form from the standard model, sin squared theta W...:

sin squared theta W = 1 - (( W / Z ) ^ 2 )

The second form calculates to the existing values of the W and Z bosons with the electron energy standard model:

WEAK MIXING ANGLE........ wma... low energy; standard model

GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT...Gn...low energy; standard model

W = 80.4 Gev

Z = 91.193347465 Gev....( 91.19 + - .0007 fermi-lab)

Gn = 6.674201227 * ( 10 ^ -11 ) m^3 / kg / s^2..(2002 NIST = 6.6742...10^-11)

1- (( W / Z ) ^ 2 ) = wma = .222705164

( emev ^ wma ) - ( 12/20 ) = emev ^ 2

..then it can be demonstrated:electron energy, emev, identities:

(( log (( log Gn ) + 12 )) + ( 12/20 )) ^ ( 1 / wma ) = sqrt (( emev ^ wma ) + .6 ) = emev

This suggests that the new .2277 form is the end of the line at high energies that when attached to 82944 (inferring symbolically as a summit-- Godhead ) creates the dimensionless fine-structure constant ....cos 1/aem .. The form of of the equation using 82944 should show modularity to 82944 and it does through integer factors of 9

82944 / 576 = 144

82944 / 2304 Aztec Alautun..time = 36 degrees of rotation on the dodecahedron

82944 / 2304 / 2 = 18

Using the Fermi-lab number for the weak mixing angle ( .2277...), modular forms of 82944 can interface with Pi in several forms:

wma = weak-mixing angle = .22769555....

( 144 ^ wma ) * 10 = Pi ^ 3

wma = weak-mixing angle = .2277020676...

(( 82944 ^ wma ) / 10 ) - 1 = 1 / Pi

wma = weak-mixing angle = .227701011...

sqrt(( 36 ^ wma ^ wma ^ wma ) - 1 ) = i ^ i

wma = weak-mixing angle = .2277107....

1 / (( e ^ ((( 18 ^ wma ) / 2 ) - 4 )) * 100 ) = i ^ i.....e = natural log 2.71828..

...since i ^ i equals square root of inverse e to the Pi'th power, then the sub-bosons Z and W can be demonstrated as the electron-proton square root of theta as bosonic ratio.......... ( 1 - Z/W ) with one (1) being substituted by the the constant .....(e^Pi) :

wma = (( e ^ Pi ) - ( 20 * Z / W )) / 2 = .2277.....

...if theequation is held within the centerline (.2277.. ) of the Fermi-lab results then the W and Z sub-bosons calculate to :

W = 80.4 Gev/(c^2)....centerline

Z = 91.19487638 Gec/(c^2) ....centerline = 91.19...+-.007

82944 seems to absorb the e natural log function as one increases beyond 36

18....i^i ...square root of negative one to the square root of negative one power

36....i^i... " " " " " "

144...Pi cubed (spatial)

82944...Pi pure form....godhead

All forms of e^Pi are related to the Fermat form ...e ^ ( Pi + 8 )......to be investigated...

Upon further investigation the equations at the bottom of the article gives factors of quark spins as objects of five-ninths...5/9. That is 5/9 times the sin squared theta W = the energy relationships. The electron does this through the bottom harmonic of 82944 ...18:

wma = weak-mixing angle, sin squared theta form = .222887292...

emev = electron energy = .510998918 mev....( 2002 NIST exact )

emev = ( .18 / wma ) ^ Pi = .510998918 mev

The equation predicts a Z boson of 91.20403305 Gev/(c^2) using W = 80.4 Gev/(c^2)

This form is the cosine derivitive of the Fermat form, a torus volume...

...since gravity is a function of the electron:

10 ^ (( 10 ^ ( emev ^ 2 )) - 12 ) = Gn = 6.6742... *10^-11

....then it can be demonstrated:

10 ^ (( 10 ^ (( .18 / wma ) ^ ( Pi * 2 ))) - 12 ) = Gn

The equation can be simplified through the electron energy, emev, the ratio 5/9 ths and the Gf constant from the fermi-coupling charge:

Gw = Gf / (( h-bar / c ) ^ 3 )

weak mixing angle = wma = .222887292 = sin-squared theta W

Z = 91.20403304 Gev boson

W = 80.4 Gev boson

emev = electron = .510998918 mev

pmev = 938.272029 mev

Gw = weak force = fermi-coupling constant = .00001166415607

wma = (( 1 - (( Z / W ) ^ 2 ) = .222887292...

(( 5 / 9 ) * 10 * wma ) ^ - Pi = emev = .510998918 mev

...proton is:

((( 5 / 9 ) * 10 * wma ) ^ -Pi ) ^ ( 1 - ( Z / W )) / Gw = 938.272029 mev * 100

....substituting for Gw:

((( 5 / 9 ) * 10 wma ) ^ Pi ) ^ ( 1 - ( Z / W )) * (( h-bar * c ) ^ 3 ) / Gf = pmev

...equation should simplify to :

((( 5 / 9 ) * 10 * wma ) ^ ( Pi - ( Pi * Z / W )) / Gw = pmev

...which is equivalent to:

((((( 5 / 9 ) * 10 * ( 1 - (( Z / W ) ^ 2 ))) ^ - Pi ) ^ ( 1 - ( Z / W )) / Gw = pmev

...as was previously shown the 5/9 ths form is just a holographic modular of 82944 or 18:

82944 / 2304 / 2 = 18

( .18 / wma ) ^ Pi = .510998918mev = emev

J.Iuliano

(http://www-e815.fnal.gov/)

(http://www.fnal.gov/)

(http://home.fnal.gov/~bugel/tour.html)

**Note:** Quote: "since gravity is a function of the electron:" J.iuliano.

Jerry is moving in a reverse direction in his examination of known so-called "particles" of modern science, in these last pages that deals with finer and finer energies of the electron, so-called quarks, the W and Z energies and finally gravity, Jerry then concludes that gravity is a function of the electron. However if you realize that if we had begun with gravity, realizing it is the force that controls these other lower energies, then the electron is a function of a higher, finer gravitic energy. Moving backward was also a technique of Einstein when he attributed the velocity of unknown space to the velocity of known light. Gravity, space twisting and space geodetic precession were also attributed to backward matter and light rather than, properly, to space. Moving backward from what we see to that which we do not see, is always backward from Reality. RG.

____________________________________

The equation above (omitted) can be simplified through the electron energy, emev, the ratio 5/9 ths and the Gf constant from the fermi-coupling charge:

Gw = Gf / (( h-bar / c ) ^ 3 )

weak mixing angle = wma = .222887292 = sin-squared theta W

Z = 91.20403304 Gev boson

W = 80.4 Gev boson

emev = electron = .510998918 mev

pmev = 938.272029 mev

Gw = weak force = fermi-coupling constant = .00001166415607

wma = (( 1 - (( W / Z ) ^ 2 ) = .222887292...

(( 5 / 9 ) * 10 * wma ) ^ - Pi = emev = .510998918 mev

...proton is:

((( 5 / 9 ) * 10 * wma ) ^ -Pi ) ^ ( 1 - ( Z / W )) / Gw = 938.272029 mev * 100

....substituting for Gw:

((( 5 / 9 ) * 10 wma ) ^ Pi ) ^ ( 1 - ( Z / W )) * (( h-bar * c ) ^ 3 ) / Gf = pmev

...equation should simplify to :

((( 5 / 9 ) * 10 * wma ) ^ ( Pi - ( Pi * Z / W )) / Gw = pmev

...which is equivalent to:

((((( 5 / 9 ) * 10 * ( 1 - (( Z / W ) ^ 2 ))) ^ - Pi ) ^ ( 1 - ( Z / W )) / Gw = pmev

...as was previously shown the 5/9 ths form is just a holographic modular of 82944 or 18:

82944 / 2304 / 2 = 18

( .18 / wma ) ^ Pi = .510998918mev = emev

...comparison to the standard model quark formula:

((( 10 * 5/9 * ( 1 - (( W / Z ) ^ 2 ))) ^ ( -Pi * ( 1 - ( Z / W ))) / Gw = pmev * 100

((( 10 * 5/9 * (( sin-squared theta W ) ^ ( -Pi * ( 1 - ( Z / W ))) / Gw = pmev * 100

((( 10 * 5/9 * ( 1 - (( W / Z ) ^ 2 ))) ^ (( Pi * Z / W ) - Pi )) / pmev / 100 = Gw

To isolate the down and up quark spins ...5/9...12 is the dodecahedron

( log ( log Gn + 12 )) ^ ( 1 / - 2 / PI ) / 10..Rybo = 5 / 9 * wma

wma = 1 - (( W / Z ) ^ 2 ) = sin-squared theta W = .222887292

Gn = gravitational constant = 6.674201227 * ( 10 ^ -11 )

(http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html) Constants Topics: _Values_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html)

_Energy Equivalents_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/energy.html)

_Searchable Bibliography_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/Citations/Search.html)

_Background_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/background.html)

____________________________________

_Constants

Bibliography_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html)

____________________________________

_Constants, Units & Uncertainty home page_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/index.html)

Fermi coupling constant

Value 1.166 39 x 10-5 GeV-2

Standard uncertainty 0.000 01 x 10-5

GeV-2 Relative standard uncertainty 8.6 x 10-6

Concise form 1.166 39(1) x 10-5 GeV-2

Click _here_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/CCValue?gf|ShowFirst=Browse) for correlation coefficient of this constant with other constants

_Source: 2002 CODATA_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html)_recommended values_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html)

_Definition ofuncertainty_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Info/Constants/definitions.html)

_Correlation coefficient with any other constant_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/CCValue?gf|ShowFirst=Browse)

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com

Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:00:31 EDT

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Subject: Re: Gx equation Question

Man, that math is deep, I don't know what they are trying to say other than the Cheops constructs ...2/Pi.... being involved...very difficult math to understand..Maybe related to this stuff...I also am going to study the G(x) equation....1/Pi/sqrt(x*(2-x)).... itself to see what comes up, I have never seen the structure before...Thanks for the heads up....

J.Iuliano

....other stuff related to Feynman's discovery of light transmission through different layers of glass...

Authors: Xiuqing Huang, Yong Wang and Changde Gong.

CCAST (World Laboratory), PO Box 8730, Beijing 100080, China

Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Optical Communication Research Section, Communications Engineering, Institute of Nanjing, Nanjing 210016, China

National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Received 26 March 1999

Print publication: Issue 39 (4 October 1999)

**Abstract.** We study numerically the optical transmission of one-dimensional binary quasiperiodic dielectric multilayers, which are arranged in Fibonacci sequences along two opposite directions and possess a mirror symmetry. We find that the transmission coefficient is unity for all sequences studied at the central wavelength ?, where ?, with ? being the index of refraction and thickness of two kinds of layer, respectively. As the number of layers in the sequence increases, more and more perfect transmission peaks appear. We observe a scaling of the transmission spectra with increasing sequence length. These phenomena will find applications in fabrication of multiwavelength narrow-band optical filters.

doi:10.1088/0953-8984/11/39/319

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com

Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:23:33 EDT

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Subject: Gx equation

Some results from studying the G(x) equation...

Gx = 1 / ( Pi / sqrt(x * ( 2-x))

2 * sqrt(x * ( 2-x)) / Pi = inverse times 2 form

x = Beta .37 :

x = .37

...then it can be demonstrated: e = natural log = 2.71828182....

G(x) = 1 / Pi / sqrt( 2x * ( x^2 )) = .409878806

e ^ ( -33/37 ) = .4098795109...

....33/37 = .891891891...a collective unconscious constant

Euler's constant .577215...also relates to the G(x) equation through light speed metric c = 299792458 m/s:...z = .49439583

( c ^ z ^ z ^ z ) - 10 = .577215...

The inverse form shows a relationship to Beta .37 : x = .369999841

2 * sqrt( 2*x - ( x^2 )) / Pi = ( 3 / 1700 ) ^ ( 1/9 ) = .494395816 = z

The **Euler-Mascheroni constant** is a mathematical constant, used mainly in number theory, and is defined as the limiting difference between the harmonic series and the natural logarithm:

Intriguingly, the constant is also given by the integral:

Its value is approximately Î³ â‰ˆ 0.577215664901532860606512090082402431042159335 9399235988057672348848677267776646709369470632917467495...

It is not known whether Î³ is a rational number or not. However, continued fraction analysis shows that if Î³ is rational, its denominator has more than 10,000 digits.

The Euler-Mascheroni constant appears in

- a product formula for the Gamma function
- calculations of the digamma function

**99.87.4 Gravity (Gn) as Circle Radius (Iuliano)**

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com

Date: Tues, 2 Nov 2004

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Subject: Gravity (Gn) as Circle Radius

MP

If one lets the gravitational constant represent a radius, one gets the circumference or perimeter of a circle...2 * Pi * radius:

Gn = 6.674205594 * ( 10 ^ -
11 ) m^3/kg/s^3 = radius in meters:

2
* Pi * Gn = 4.193527053 * ( 10 ^ - 10 ) meters = circumference circle

...put this very tiny circular length into
Planck constant units which creates velocity m/s:

h = Planck constant =
6.626069287 * ( 10 ^ - 34 ) Joule ( m^2*kg/s^2)

c = speed of light =
299792458 meters/second

Gn
* 2 * pi / h = 6.3288306 * ( 10 ^ 23 ) m/s ...Planck constant
units

...divide the converted circle perimeter, ( Planck
constant units ), by 7.0417738 meters per second...( c ^ .1)...( equivalent to
23.10332045 feet per second or 15.75226394 miles per hour )

c ^ .1 = 7.0417738 m/s = 15.75226394
mph

.....the perimeter of a circle with Gn as radius,
measured in Planck constant units, divided by (c ^ .1) equals the total nuclear energy conversion of exactly one metric ton of mass.

Gn
* 2 * Pi / h / ( c ^.1 ) m^.1kg/s^.1 = ( 10 ^ 6 )g * ( c ^ 2 )
m^2*kg/s^2

...the right side of the equation is in acceleration form...m^2/s^2...while the left side is in velocity form...m*kg/s... only now with weird fractal dimensioning on the metric light speed, that is meters are shortened to one tenth actual distance as power...m^.1... and seconds are shortened to one tenth fractal power..s^.1... The two factors remain relevant since both are shrunk by one-tenth powers. So you have a strange velocity of almost human like speed ...15.75... mph... as a key ingredient to the strange mathematical
results that govern gravitational strengths in relation to mass and
distance. What does that mean? Can you take a certain object of certain mass or maybe shape ( Gn * 2 * Pi ..a string in a loop ) and accelerate it to exactly 15.75226394 mph and by some strange workings, out spits some useable mechanical conversion of this tremendous energy to a very small and useable human scale. The only comparison I can make of this energy is to convert the perimeter of the Planck unit circle from meters to grams and then accelerate this gigantic weight...6.32883067 * ( 10 ^ 23 ) grams...(6.977..* (10 ^ 17) tons)... to 15.75226394 mph which is, in kinetic form, about equivalent in energy to one metric ton of matter converted to 100 % energy. One should be able to scale down in ratio to a more sizable mass to accelerate to a specific speed a certain object that will show strange light effects determined by gravitational influences.

J.Iuliano

**99.87.5 Re: Borg cube and Planckian units (Iuliano)**

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com

Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:17:03 EST

To: rgrace@rgrace.org

Subject: Re: Borg cube and Planckian units

Since I made the discovery that the Planck mass can be represented in light speed fractals, note the 10 cubed constant ...again the strange 10 thing...

# Mp = ( c ^ -.55 ) / ( 10 ^ 3 )

...I have attempted to bring all the data about black holes into perspective as to their electromagnetic equivalencies. All derivations are in SI units. The five metrics of the Planck mass object ( smallest black hole allowed ) can be demonstrated as:

PLANCK MASS kg = Mp = 2.176449594 * ( 10 ^ -8 ) kilograms

Mp = sqrt( c * h-bar / G )

# Mp = ( c ^ -.55 ) / ( 10 ^ 3 )

PLANCK LENGTH m = Ml = 1.616243488 * ( 10 ^ -35 ) meters

Ml = sqrt( G * h-bar / ( c ^ 3 )

# Ml = ( 10 ^ 3 ) * h-bar / ( c ^ .45 )

PLANCK TIME s = Ms = 5.391207968 * ( 10 ^ -44 ) seconds

Ms = sqrt( G * h-bar / ( c ^ 5 )

#Ms = ( 10 ^ 3 ) * h-bar / ( c ^ 1.45 )

PLANCK TEMPERATURE K = Mk = 1.416792756 * ( 10 ^ 32 ) Kelvin

Kb = Boltzmann constant = 1.3806503 * ( 10 ^ - 23 ) J/K

Mk = sqrt( c ^ 1.45 ) / ( 10 ^ 3 ) / Kb

# Mk = ( c ^ 1.45 ) / ( 10 ^ 3 ) / Kb

PLANCK ENERGY Amp = Ma =1.956095344 * ( 10 ^ 9 ) Amp

G = gravitational constant = 6.674205594 * ( 10 ^ -11 ) m^3/kg/s^2

h-bar = Dirac's constant = 1.0547168 * ( 10 ^ - 34 ) Joules

c = speed of light = 299792458 meters/second

Ma = ( c ^ 2 ) * sqrt( c * h-bar / G

# Ma = ( c ^ 1.45 ) / ( 10 ^ 3 )

PLANCK DENSITY kg/m^3 = Md = 5.154995005 * ( 10 ^ 96 ) kg/m^3

Md = ( c ^ 5 ) / h-bar / ( G ^ 2 )

# Md = ( c ^ .8 ) / ( 10 ^ 12 ) / ( h-bar ^ 3 )

...Planck density...Md... is the root of the electron..emev = .510998986mev.. because of :

log(logG + 12 ) = emev ^ 2

...such that by substitution of the Planck density value...Md... the following can be reduced:

log log(( c ^ 2.9 ) * ( 10 ^ 6 ) / Md / (h-bar ^ 2 )) = emev ^ 2

...this equation can be further reduced by the permittivity of space constant...E:

E = permittivity of space = 8.854187818* ( 10 ^ - 12 ) F/m

h = Plancks constant = 6.626069287 * ( 10 ^ - 34 ) J

log log(( c ^ 4.9 ) * 1.6 * ( Pi ^ 3 ) * E / Md / ( h ^ 2 )) = emev ^ 2

...Pi cubed is interesting... lending to multiple formulas...

...once these factors are known then the following peculiarities about a black hole can be shown:

FREQUENCY of black hole:

hertz = Hz = 1/s

( c ^ 1.45 ) / h-bar / ( 10 ^ 3 ) = 1.854871869 * ( 10 ^ 43 ) Hz

...a huge number of vibrations per second

PRESSURE ,or FIELD STRESS of black hole: pascal = Pa = kg/m/s^2

( c ^ 2.8 ) / ( 10 ^ 12 ) / ( h-bar ^ 3 ) = Pressure > 10 ^ 100 Pa

...tremendously off the scale greater than 10^100 Pa

POWER, RADIANT FLUX of black hole:

watt = W = m^2*kg/s^3

( c ^ 2.9 ) / ( 10 ^ 6 ) / h-bar = 3.628306226 * ( 10 ^ 52 ) W

...again a tremendous number , 2.4 * (10 ^ 50) light bulbs going all at once.

SURFACE TENSION of black hole:

newton per meter = kg/s^2

( c ^ . 9 ) / ( 10 ^ 9 ) / ( h-bar ^ 2 ) = 3.828127761 * ( 10 ^ 66 ) N/m

....again this is a very large amount of pressure on the "skin" of the Planck mass. But the really strange discovery using the new form of Planck mass as a fractal of light speed is the formula concerning the specific heat capacity of an object:

SPECIFIC HEAT CAPACITY, SPECIFIC ENTROPY..Mp black hole

joule per kilogram Kelvin: J/kg = m^2/s^2/K

Kb / Mp = 6.343589597 * ( 10 ^ - 16 ) J/kg

...this is just the Boltzmann constant divided by Planck mass...!!!! This is an extremely simple relationship, one that hasn't ( I don't think) been seen before...showing the radiation, although very tiny, of an entropic black hole showing a very, very, very, slow death almost infinity like, as far as time scales. ( Hawkings radiation ???)..or looked another way black holes live almost to infinity...

J.Iuliano

The following are the Euclidean Planck units:

PLANCK MASS = sqrt( h-bar * c / Gn ) = ( c ^ -.55 ) / ( 10 ^ 3 ) kg

PLANCK LENGTH = sqrt( Gn * h-bar / ( c ^ 3 ) = ( 10 ^ 3 ) * h-bar * ( c ^ .45 ) m

PLANCK TIME = sqrt( Gn * h-bar / ( c ^ 5 ) = ( 10 ^ 3 ) * h-bar * ( c ^ 1.45 ) s

Note the difference between the Planck length and time formulas. The gravitational form....Gn... shows a speed of light speed increase of Einsteinian form...( c ^ 3 ) * ( c ^ 2 ) = c ^ 5.... an energy to mass transformation....E = mass * ( c ^ 2 )... while the 10^3 form shows a unit c speed increase of one plus .45 as dimensional increase on the light speed unit. It is amazing that the 1000 unit form is equivalent to the square root of the Newtonian constant Gn as an energy equivalent...c^2..., as it transforms to the time unit. That is time is converted to length through a subtraction of energy, while length is converted to time through an addition of energy:

Length------plus (c^2) energy....= time..(c^5)

Time------minus (c^2) energy....= length (c^3)

However the 1000 form increases as one unit of c or speed per 1000 units spanned. The action of square to square root is an energy equivalence thing. Why is a Tetrakys three dimensional cube...10^3...equivalent to a Gn shelled, h-bar, in an energy form ...( c^3) * (c^2)? Note that the Planck unit ratio...Planck length divided by Planck time in the gravitational form reduces to ...1/c^2 meters squared per seconds squared (ACCELERATION)..while in the 10 cube form a velocity is reduced by ...1/c... meters per second (VELOCITY)...this is important because in the Gn form one extracts energy by constant acceleration as a function of gravity, while in the ...10^3..(Borg cube) form...gravitational energy is extracted as a function of a constant velocity ...light speed ..!!!

J.Iuliano

**99.87.6 Question: Borg cube and Planckian units (c = -.55) (MetPhys)**

From: rgrace@rgrace.org

Date: Tues, 16 Nov 2004

To: Jerryiuliano@aol.com

Subject: Question: Borg cube and Planckian units (c = -.55)

Quote: "Since I made the discovery that the Planck mass can be represented in **light speed fractals**..."

Question, based upon the following Information:

1. Where do **light speed fractals** fit?

PrimaSounds:

Defines the Zero Dimension as the home of Natural numbers 1-9.

Defines the First Dimension as the home of Whole or Integer Numbers 10-1 Negative, 0 and 1-10 Positive.

Defines the Second Dimension as the home of Rational Numbers based upon three points on a plane with vertical and horizontal axis. Rational numbers are produced by division in the positive field and by multiplication in the negative field. Zero is the center of CHI. The fields contain only the fractions and products inside the ten numbers.

Defines the Third Dimension as the home of Real Numbers. Real numbers start from zero and connect fractions of the same numerical value, leading to the proportions (1/1, 1/2) and functions.

The Forth Dimension is portrayed geometrically by fractals and the Hypercube. It is the home of the Complex Numbers and Fractal Geometry. The infinity of the Forth Dimension lies in the infinity of relations. This can be expressed in terms of "fractal scaling", from the infinitely small to the infinitely big, perpendicular to the other dimensions and including the intervals or fractal dimensions between them.

MP

**99.87.7 Blackholes Don't Exist Alone (MetPhys)**

From: rgrace@rgrace.org

Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004

To: Jerryiuliano@aol.com

Subject: Blackholes Don't Exist Alone

Sir,

Perhaps you can't make flat statements such as "There are no blackholes", but I am under no such censorship.

Rather than eliminating blackholes completely, let's just say that every spiraling, spherical entity has lightholes at each end and a hole in the middle and are, in size, from extremely small to extremely large. This, I call the Toroidal Universe, where every spherical structure is actually a toroid, where matter is recycled into light, through the centers. So we should learn and accept that every blackhole side always has a lighthole partner on the other side of a toroidal structure.

I believe the previous forces and maths in Section: "Borg cube and Planckian units", applies to the smallest to largest structures in universe. But for each separate level there must be a separate form of maths to describe it. One formulae cannot apply to all levels of toroidal black/whiteholes.

Here is a real picture of real silicon atoms, and all of them look like toroidal structures with light in the centers. In no cases are there any orbiting electrons around these atoms.

Electron Micrograph of Silicon Crystals. (JPG)

**99.87.8 The electron is space time (Jerryiuliano)**

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com
**Date:** Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:15:47 EST
**To:** rgrace@rgrace.org
**Subject:** The electron is space time

According to the following equations, electron energy...emev.... is a result of Planck mass, black holes bending the gravitational waves influenced by the bending of other black hole's gravitational gravitons. The density of the Planck mass blackholes in kilograms per meter cubed can be shown as:

Md = Planck density kg/m^3 = 5.154995005 * ( 10 ^ 96 ) kg/m^3

Md = ( c ^ 5 ) / h-bar / ( G ^ 2 ) kg/m^3

...where: c = speed of light = 299792458 meters/second

h-bar = Dirac's constant = 1.05457168 * ( 10 ^ - 34 ) Joules

h = Planck's constant = 6.626069287 * ( 10 ^ - 3 4 ) Joules

G = gravitational constant = 6.674205594 * ( 10 ^ - 11 ) m^3/kg/s^2

emev = electron energy = .510998986 mev

... the newly discovered light speed fractal form can also describe the Planck density, in kilograms per meters cubed:

Md = ( c ^ .8 ) / ( 10 ^ 12 ) / ( h-bar ^ 3 )

...since the factor ...10 ^ 12.... can be shown in the double log form for electron energy:

log(logG + 12 ) = emev ^ 2

...then the electron energy....emev.... can be shown as a function of Planck black hole density....Md:

log log(( c ^ 2.9 ) / ( 10 ^ 6 ) / Md / ( h-bar ^ 2 )) = emev ^ 2

...since ...10 ^ 6... is a factor of the permittivity of space ...E.. then the following reduction can be shown:

log log (( c ^ 4.9 ) * 1.6 * ( Pi ^ 3 ) * E / Md ) / ( h ^ 2 )) = emev ^ 2

...a very complex equation...however since were talking about gravitons being influenced by other gravitons, ( unknown in electromagnetism ) these interference waves create the structure of Einsteinian space-time in which gravitational waves affect the fabric of space-time itself. This effect is called the " energy density per unit curvature of space-time "also known as the measurement of the stiffness of space time" caused by gravitational waves interacting with masses and their generated gravitational waves. The energy density per unit curvature equation can be described as follows:

( c ^ 4 ) / 8 / Pi / G = Z = energy density/unit curvature

....this equation can be expressed by the light speed fractal form as :

Z = 4.815522001 * ( 10 ^ 42 ) Eden/curv

Z = ( c ^ -.1 ) / 1.6 / h / Pi / E

...note the permittivity of space form ...E... in both the electronic and energy density equations, which means the inverse Z form is :

1/ Z = 1.6 * h * Pi * E * ( c ^ .1 )

...substituting this form into the electronic equation one gets:

log log(( c ^ 4.8 ) * ( Pi ^ 2 ) / ( h ^ 3 ) / Z / Md )) = emev ^ 2

...this equation shows the curvature....Z... caused by the massive three dimensional density ...kg/m^3 of the Planck mass blackhole object...Md.... is logarithmically equivalent to the electron energy squared...emev ^ 2.

J.Iuliano

To which one can only add:

Space dragging was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension space,

Space twisting was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension space,

Geodetic precession was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension space,

Gravity was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension space,

Time was attributed to 4D instead of to 0D gravity,

Light bending was attributed to gravity instead of to optical, non-dimension space,

All because non-dimension space could not easily be measured, therefore the measurers were not needed.

**99.87.9 Question: The electron is space time. (MetPhys)**

From: rgrace@rgrace.org
**Date:** Fri, 19 Nov 2004
**To:** JerryIuliano@aol.com
**Subject:** Question: The electron is space time.

Sir,

According to the PDF Document below, every blackhole has a partner whitehole. My question is, "What is the differences between your notation and this Author's notation?

Source: Energy from Electrons and Matter from Protons: A Preliminary Model Based on Observer Physics (PDF) by Douglass A. White

To Summarize:

* Ledb = h / Me c = 2.426x10^-12 m. (electron's de Broglie wavelength)

* u = Me c^2 / h = c / Ledb = 1.237x10^20 Hz. (electron's fundamental frequency)

* (u) (Ledb) = c = 3x10^8 m / s. (Photon velocity at the de Broglie wavelength)

* Lpl ~~ 4x10^-35 m. (Planck scale wavelength)

* Vepl = (f) (Lpl) ~~ 4.95x10^-15 m / s. (Photon velocity at Planck wavelength) (The spirals in the charts above are drawn as Archimedeans to show more vortex detail.)

* (Vg) (Vp) = (c) (c).

* (phi^0)(phi^1) = (phi^1/2)(phi^1/2).

* [phi^AP] [phi^(AP+2P)] = [phi^(AP+P)] [phi^(AP+P)].

* Re = phi^(AP/P) (Rpl). (One possible formula for the spiral)

The above example could be a pair of electrons in a hydrogen atom interacting with the positrons that lurk at the core of the proton. The electrons function as the "white hole" portion of the system, receiving anti photons at the singularity and spitting photons out from the periphery to feed the positrons. The positrons function as the "black hole" portion of the system, sucking photons in at the periphery, and feeding them to the electron singularity as anti-photons via the quantum tunnel under the vacuum zero point.

There seems to be a general misunderstanding among physicists about the non-classical nature of an electron's quantized spin. First, they marvel at its two values. All spinning tops have two equally probable values -- up and down -- if they are symmetrical. But they can have various angular momenta. The restriction to only two values of spin derives from the fact that the electron's spin is an expression of the photons emerging from its singularity. The photons all travel at light-speed in a vacuum, and the photons moving around the outermost rim of the electron move at that constant speed. The electron itself does not spin. It is just a tiny piece of highly warped space/time generated by the density of the tightly curled photon trajectory. The photon, on the other hand begins its journey from the singularity at an extremely slow pace. Compared to its usual pace it is nearly frozen in space/time. Therefore the analysis using Heisenberg uncertainty is faulty. (For example, see Kroemer, p. 561.)

**99.87.10 Light speed fractals (Iuliano)**

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com
**Date:** Sun, November 21, 2004 11:17 am
**To:** rgrace@rgrace.org
**Subject:** Light speed fractals

Quote: "Since I made the discovery that the Planck mass can be represented in light speed fractals..."

Question, based upon the following Information:

1. Where do light speed fractals fit?

The only thing I can think of right now is the units of measure m/s ...for light speed this is meters per second. Normally for 3-dimensional acceleration purposes this can be shown as ...m^2 / s^2 .... while velocity can be shown as distance divided by time...m/s. So what does .... (m^.1) / (s^.1) mean? If the exponent was 1 instead of 1/10 then it would be the identity of velocity. But strange things happen when you divide by ten. In number systems 10 is the modulo of 1, that is, it repeats in 10 units of 1. But in the exponential system 10 "separates" from one in its mathematical application, the logarithms. So you know that it is a form of log acceleration because any thing off of unity...1... applied in the equation results in a form of log acceleration, even though it is not the three dimensional kind ruled by m/s in integer dimension. What kind of universe would it be if the .1 fractal for acceleration in a space time dimension were true? Exactly the same as ours because the light speed fractal is modulo to all things three dimensional....the equations are exactly equivalent!! Which means the systems intertwine with each other. The .1 fractal on acceleration means everything is extremely slowed down. In fact it is slowed down to the point where there is a lowpoint velocity of ...m^.1/s^.1....in other words it can act like a velocity and acceleration form at the same after modulo ten transformation....1--to--1/10 !! .There are many black hole forms that express this acceleration affect...Planck area uses...m^.9/s^.9 ....Planck length uses... m^.45/s^.45 ...Planck time , temperature and electrical current is ...m^1.45/s^1.45....and I think one of the most applicable ones is the relativistic "space-time stiffness" form from Einstein's, energy density per unit curvature of the space-time equation:

Z = ( c ^ -.1 ) / 1.6 / h / Pi / E

......the fractal ...m ^ -.1 / s ^ -.1... is a very, very slow velocity ---- acceleration form...about .1420096763 meters per second...very slow for light speed. There is another form related to fine-structure that goes even slower, using the curve of space-time...Z... as the geometry:

aem = ( c ^ - .9 ) * Z * ( e ^ 2 ) * Pi * .8

...the light speed fractal for velocity--acceleration is ...c^-.9 ...an extremely slow velocity ...m^-.9/s^-.9 = 2.348882906 * ( 10 ^ - 8 ) meters per second...just barely crawling, moving 1 foot in 150.2 days..! The last equation shows that you should be able to take energy out of the fabric of space-time...Z... by slowing light down to this incredibly slow speed . The only known object that can do this in the universe is the black hole mass . It can affect light speed to this effect Small problem though, with energy extraction out of the space time fabric, you have to have a Planckian black hole to cash in on the affect, no known technology can hold 'em.

.......J.Iuliano

**99.87.11 Energy from electrons (Iuliano)**

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com
**Date:** Sun, November 21, 2004 11:45 am
**To:** rgrace@rgrace.org
**Subject:** Energy from electrons

Sir,

According to the PDF Document below, every blackhole has a partner whitehole. My question is, "What is the differences between your notation and this Author's notation?

Source: Energy from Electrons and Matter from Protons: A Preliminary Model Based on Observer Physics (PDF) by Douglass A. White

To Summarize:

* Ledb = h / Me c = 2.426x10^-12 m. (electron's de Broglie wavelength)

* u = Me c^2 / h = c / Ledb = 1.237x10^20 Hz. (electron's fundamental
frequency)

* (u) (Ledb) = c = 3x10^8 m / s. (Photon velocity at the de Broglie
wavelength)

* Lpl ~~ 4x10^-35 m. (Planck scale wavelength)

* Vepl = (f) (Lpl) ~~ 4.95x10^-15 m / s. (Photon velocity at Planck
wavelength) (The spirals in the charts above are drawn as Archimedeans to
show more vortex detail.)

* (Vg) (Vp) = (c) (c).

* (phi^0)(phi^1) = (phi^1/2)(phi^1/2).

* [phi^AP] [phi^(AP+2P)] = [phi^(AP+P)] [phi^(AP+P)].

* Re = phi^(AP/P) (Rpl). (One possible formula for the spiral)

The above example could be a pair of electrons in a hydrogen atom interacting with the positrons that lurk at the core of the proton. The electrons function as the "white hole" portion of the system, receiving anti photons at the singularity and spitting photons out from the periphery to feed the positrons. The positrons function as the "black hole" portion of the system, sucking photons in at the periphery, and feeding them to the electron singularity as anti-photons via the quantum tunnel under the vacuum zero point.

There seems to be a general misunderstanding among physicists about the non-classical nature of an electron's quantized spin. First, they marvel at its two values. All spinning tops have two equally probable values -- up and down -- if they are symmetrical. But they can have various angular momenta. The restriction to only two values of spin derives from the fact that the electron's spin is an expression of the photons emerging from its singularity. The photons all travel at light-speed in a vacuum, and the photons moving around the outermost rim of the electron move at that constant speed. The electron itself does not spin. It is just a tiny piece of highly warped space/time generated by the density of the tightly curled photon trajectory. The photon, on the other hand begins its journey from the singularity at an extremely slow pace. Compared to its usual pace it is nearly frozen in space/time. Therefore the analysis using Heisenberg uncertainty is faulty. (For example, see Kroemer, p. 561.)

...I believe I just answered the above in the last e-mail concerning the very slow speed of the black-hole pre photon before it is "released" by the fine-structure constant again a slightly faster but still a very slow speed entity ...it is almost like the photon is "born" into existence through various speed stagings (fine-structure) allowed in the "womb" of the Plankian black hole....Whether this object is a torus or not depends on the geometry of the torus which is based both as volume and surface areas by Pi squared. Equations with this factor ( PI ^ 2 ) are around. One extraordinary Pi squared equation is the gravitational form:

1.25 * h / ( Mp ^ 4 ) / ( Pi ^ 2 ) / ( c ^ 2.1 ) / E = G

..This formula is the magnitude formula for starlight dimming as a function of distance:

M = star magnitude number

F = flux of radiation = W / ( r ^ 2 ) / omega / cm^2

omega = angle of light beam

( M1 - M2 ) / log ( F2 / F1 ) = 2.5

...which is the source of the factor 1.25 = 2.5 /2

J.Iuliano

**99.87.12 Light speed fractals (MetPhys)**

From: rgrace@rgrace.org
**Date:** Tues, November 23, 2004 1:38 pm
**To:** JerryIuliano@aol.com
**Subject:** Light speed fractals

I asked "Where do light speed fractals fit? (Dimension 0,1,2,3 or 4?)". The answer: "The only thing I can think of right now is the units of measure m/s ...for light speed this is meters per second." This confused me. I tried to understand that normal 3-dimensional acceleration of m^2/s^2, differs from (m^.1)/(s^.1) by the results of dividing by .1, which does not produce as strange of results as dividing by 10. After an explanation of unity 1, upon which log acceleration is based, you say that the fractal dimension is "exactly equivalent" which means the "systems intertwine with each other", one system has "everything slowed down" while "intertwined". I hope I got all this correct and it leaves me with a few questions, if you don't mind:

Questions:

1. Are you saying that by simply altering the exponent from 1 to fractal .1, that this can describe intertwined dimensions that are otherwise exactly the same?

2. Previously I had noted that we were approaching the limits of dimensions such as "particles W,Z, gravitons etc.", that we can detect and that the virtual, "invisible partner dimensions" were two rotation from these we detect, for which I requested knowledge. Is this light speed fractal, a divergence from that request or an effort to explain it?

3. Is the "slowed down" system of a blackhole, pre-photon, a beat frequency?

4. What is the difference between unity = 1 and unity = 2 of Bucky Fullers spin-1/2 pairs when matter is reduced to its extreme definition?

5. Space and time do not exist. Can you show that these exist by showing how the permittivity of space is measured and why this assumption of science makes sense- "We shall, **assume without examination**, the unidirectional, one-valued, one-dimensional character of the time continuum."
http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/ce/timenat.htm
Reciprocal Systems

6. How can these systems be represented with binary 0 and 1?

7. Can there be fractal binary .0 and .1?

**99.87.13 More Questions: Light speed fractals (MetPhys)**

From: rgrace@rgrace.org
**Date:** Tues, November 24, 2004 9:58 pm
**To:** JerryIuliano@aol.com
**Subject:** More Questions: Light speed fractals

Is the Fiegenbaum bifurcation regulator the source of your new concept, the "light speed fractals"? Does light require a fractal bifurcation as does the "virtual" to the "real"? When light is designated with a .1 fractal (c = .1), does this mean that light, at light speed, is no speed at all, or at best, very little speed at all? If the fractal light speeds are fact, it says what R. Ayana has said, "Light "travels" at all speeds, we just detect light speed and sub-light speeds".

Source: 99.58.4 Feigenbaum----fine-structure (Jerryiuliano)

"As far as the mathematical equations statement of interpretations of the universal acceptance of the infinite chaotic energy of the zero-point field or the virtual infinite vector field energy, the equations say that this chaotic field is converged to a cusp of continuously moving "bifurcation" that is associated with a phase transition from "virtual" (infinite potential expressed in chaos) to "real" (the convergence of virtual chaos to reality) through the mathematical constant that controls the periodicity of this dynamic chaos, the Feigenbaum constant...4.669201609."

"In many cases, the "attractor" or "strange attractor", associated with a "transformation" or "flow" (cusp of continuously moving bi-furcation) is a fractal."

[tan^-1((cos 137.03599976)^-(2*bl/ht))] + (2*bl/ht) = 4.669201609

ht = 486.257013

bl = 763.81

"The equation means there is a super-reality which is composed of the dual phenomenon of Nature, the seething infinite energy of virtual reality (zero-point vacuum) and a measured reality, fine-structure constant 1/137.03599976, that condenses to the exact measured constituents of matter in million electron volts (mev) ,the electron....510998902 mev.(1998 NIST) and proton...938.271998 mev (1998 NIST). How virtual reality gets into a reality of the measured world is defined, mathematically by the Feigenbaum, bi-furcation constant..4.669201609."

**99.87.14 More Questions: Light and Its Speed (MetPhys)**

From: rgrace@rgrace.org
**Date:** Tues, November 25, 2004 10:33 am
**To:** JerryIuliano@aol.com
**Subject:** More Questions: Light and Its Speed

Premise 1: Space, not light, is the rotating quanta.

Premise 2: Light does not travel through space.

In a problem concerning light traveling, it has always bothered me that science claims that starlight travels through space and we see it as a point of light of that distant star. However, in deep space, it is said that there is only one atom per 27 cubic feet of space. This is one atom in a 3x3x3 ft. cube of totally empty space (no wave nodes). Light, additionally, only seems to radiate from matter but never from space. Where is all the other light from the star?

If it can be demonstrated that light doesn't travel, how can the following apply to light rather than to the velocity of space itself?

"Note the difference between the Planck length and time formulas. The gravitational form....Gn... shows a speed of light speed increase of Einsteinian form...( c ^ 3 ) * ( c ^ 2 ) = c ^ 5.... an energy to mass transformation....E = mass * ( c ^ 2 )... while the 10^3 form shows a unit c speed increase of one plus .45 as dimensional increase on the light speed unit."

MP

**99.87.15 More Questions: Light and Its Speed (RGrace)**

From: rgrace@rgrace.org
**Date:** Tues, November 25, 2004 10:33 am
**To:** Dr. Kaivarainen
**Subject:** More Questions: Light and Its Speed

Dr. Kaivarainen,

The more I examine certain claims attributed to mass, gravity, light, etc., rather than that attribute being attributed to space itself, the more I reject it. One claim is that light travels through space. I say light can't travel through space because it cannot exist in deep space. Does your bivacuum theory hint at the velocity of light being the velocity of space? After all, two rotating vortexes of space, called the bi-vacuum, must have a velocity.

Source: Bivacuum, as a Matrix for Matter: "In accordance to formalism of our theory, the rest mass and charge of elementary fermions origination are both the result of Bivacuum fermions (BVF) symmetry shift, corresponding to Golden mean conditions,i.e. equality of the ratio of external velocity of BVF to light velocity squared to: (v/c)^{2}= Phi = 0. 618."

My Premises:

Premise 1: Space, not light, is the rotating quanta.

Premise 2: Light does not travel through space.

In a problem concerning light traveling, it has always bothered me that science claims that starlight travels through space and we see it as a point of light of that distant star. However, in deep space, it is said that there is only one atom per 27 cubic feet of space. This is one atom in a 3x3x3 ft. cube of totally empty space (no wave nodes). Light, additionally, only seems to radiate from matter but never from space. Where is all the other light from the star?

Robert Grace

© Copyright. Robert Grace. 2004