99.35.1 E = m (c^2) Substitutions; Using "ASM" Nodes (MLM)

Page 35

Sections List- 99 Electrons and Mythologies
Impossible Correspondence Index

Subj: E = m (c^2) Substitutions; Using "ASM" Nodes
Date: 08/16/2001
From: (MLM)
Email: Milamo@aol.com

E = m (c^2) Substitutions; Using Actual "ASM" Nodes

This will introduce some recent work I've done, regarding the idea of using actual (already-ascertained) "ASM" nodes as 'substitutions' in the Einstein E = m (c^2) equation.

I will use m = Unit 1.

I will use c = 162000 nautical miles per second (Bruce Cathie).

So; E = 1 X (162000 X 162000) = 2.6244 X (10^10).

_______________________________

Despite the current, and on-going, debate .. over the "relativity" question, and, over what seems, to me, to be "relativity semantics" .. I will also be using what I call "the cesium light-speed factor" .. based on the experiment reported as of July 20th, 2000, measuring the speed of a "light-pulse" through a 6 cm length tube .. where said tube is filled with a specially-prepared cesium-gas medium.

The experimenters reported that this light-pulse traveled approximately *310 times faster* .. than it does in a "vacuum" tube of 6 cm length.

In my work, I am assuming this simply means that .. this light-pulse traveled 310 times faster-than a light-pulse travels (in 0.2 nanosecond, through 6 cm of length) in a *vacuum* .. as clearly reported by the experimenters. I am_not_even speculating about "relativity" or "time travel" .. whatsoever. (0.2 / 310) = 0.000645161 nanosecond. Note .. this is a very simple, direct calculation. No "hocus-pocus" here, at all. This has_*nothing*_whatsoever .. to do with "time travel" or with "relativity". Can we please be clear about this ?

Reference ... http://www.neci.nj.nec.com/homepages/lwan/faq.htm

_______________________________

I have proposed, very recently on The Internet, that this reported "310" factor is_actually_a base-ten harmonic of (Pi Cubed) .. 10 times (Pi Cubed), or .. 310.0627668 .. and that this 'more-accurate' value reflects an "ASM" resonance apparently involved in this experiment. I_think_it will be found, also, that this is an example of the_significance_of the "ASM" to "applied science".

_______________________________

A Beginning Look at Substitutions
Involving Certain "ASM" Nodes ..
Pertaining to the Einstein E = m (c^2) Equation

It is now apparent to me that the Jan.1, 2000 sky-location of REGULUS, the Heart of Leo .. is a very_crucial_"ASM" node. My Grid POINT Value for that particular node is .. 19.7392088 .. the multiplied-product of (Pi times the double-of-itself) .. Pi X 2Pi. (Morton, 1999, Internet).

I decided to see how this value would relate to the equation E = m (c^2).

Notice .. E = [10c X (3.141592654 ^2) X (180 ^2)] / 19.7392088

You have, there, 10 times the 162000 (naut.mi.per-sec) light-speed ... times the Square of a very high-precision Pi constant ... times the Square of 180 ... then .. *all of the above*_divided-by_the Jan.1, 2000 Grid POINT Value of REGULUS .. "the heart of the king, the ruler".

And 180 .. is exactly HALF 360 .. a half-circle. So .. this resonates with the *360 system*, of metrology, or .. if you prefer .. "of geometry".

In addition, you have "10 times" the light-speed, as a factor .. a built-in reference to base 10.

In the 162000 nautical miles-per-second Bruce Cathie light-speed .. it is assumed that this light-speed is "pure, ideal light-speed" .. meaning 'un-affected' by any relative-proximity to celestial bodies .. unaffected by gravity, magnetism, or by planetary electric fields, or latitudes, or any of that type of dynamic. So this is the "theoretical maximum" light-speed in the_*ether*_of free-space.

_______________________________

Regarding "Kingship/Queenship" and POSITION

What makes a King or Queen ? Their *position*, in society .. right ?

They were "born into" a certain family .. at "the right time" .. correct ? Yes .. surely this involves astrological parameters, as Mr. Rab Wilkie likes to say.

And .. this involves certain DNA, too, does it not ?

Position is similar to *location* .. which also involves *timing* .. time/space interactions.

A King or Queen is .. or 'was' .. thought of as a "ruler" .. or a "reg-u-lator" .. notice the etymological reference to "regular" .. and to the name ('titular' name ?) .. "REGULUS".

What makes REGULUS so important ? Its position .. its location .. as of Jan.1, 2000 A.D. Why is 2000 A.D. important ? It refers, of course, to the historical Jesus the Christ .. 2000 years from the year 00 B.C./A.D. He was related .. directly descended .. from certain lineages that go back to 2 great Anunnaki ancestors of ours.

According to Laurence Gardner's work, it is becoming more-and-more apparent that a *decision was made* .. by certain ancestors of ours .. to "time" the mathematical-alignments of the_sky-locations_in the "ASM" to correlate according to the current "western calendar" .. as of Jan.1, 2000, or New Year's Eve of 1999/2000. I emphasize that this is entirely based, at least as far as my own observations and calculations regarding the "ASM" are concerned ... on *empirical* observations !! (And .. of course, on impartial data sources). This is certainly_not_intended as any sort of "religious" statement, or as part of any kind of "religious agenda", whatsoever. The major historical antecedent to the_current_"kingship/queenship" legacy on our planet Earth, is evidently in the persons of EN.KI. and NIN.HUR.SAG.

These 2 people were great leaders .. and were Anunnaki ancestors of ours.

In the earliest days .. the kings and queens were *servants of the People*. Yes .. they were *of-service-to* the people .. not "dictators" or tyrants". This we are learning from the work of people such as Neil Freer and Laurence Gardner.

_______________________________

The very_decision_to orient the ecliptic so that these "ASM" correlations would become "self-evident" is .. in-and-of-itself .. a mind-blowing scenario. This would mean (unless anyone has a better theory) that our solar system, *itself*, was consciously_placed_in a position .. literally .. such that these *precise* mathematical "ASM" relationships would_appear_AT Jan.1, 2000 !!! And it also seems that our modern calendar was 'adjusted' and 'refined' to correlate with this "timed-scenario" !!

This implies a_project_so consciously long-term .. so *incredibly ancient* .. that it is on the scale of_billions_of years. Of course, the Anunnaki, then, were_only_the *most-recent* group of our ancestors to be involved in the "custodianship" of maintaining certain "markers" and other orientation systems regarding the "ASM". But, the fact that the Anunnaki *are* the most-recent group is also significant, because that is where "we" must *begin* in our 'unraveling' and in our 'catching-up' to our own heritage and identity as a planetary species.

There may have been_other_major "convergence nodes" .. in-addition to this one of Jan.1, 2000. This one may be only 'one' of a considerable number of others in the past .. having to do with this same ecliptic. That is an unknown, at present. I'd say we've got more than enough to be excited about with this one, anyway.

_______________________________

10c is Displayed by The Newark Earthworks
Of Newark, Ohio, USA .. 3 Sites

In 2000, I posted material on The Internet that comprised my 'second revision' of Munck's assessment of the 3 major earthworks at Newark, Ohio, USA.

I did this from "scratch", using the official USGS topographical map series '7.5-minute Quadrangle' of scale 1 : 24000. {Newark, Ohio}. I found centered "ASM" Grid POINT Values of ..

* Observatory Circle .. 90.
* Great Octagon .. 75.
* Octagon Circle .. 240.

I noted the multiplied-product of these .. (90 X 75 X 240) = 1620000. This figure is 10 times c .. the B.Cathie "theoretical maximum light-speed in *ether* or free-space".

So .. I now see the direct reference to the 10c factor in this particular "E" substitution equation, as shown earlier in this piece.

Another "E" Substitution

E = (Newark Earthworks) X (Area of a Circle) X (Half-Pi) ..

where the generic Area of a Circle is found by using 57.29577951 as the numerical value of the "given radius" .. because .. 57.29577951 arc-degrees_is_the numerical value of The Radian Arc on a circumference of 360 arc-degrees. Of course .. this is consistent with "our" system of geometry / metrology .. the system handed-down to us from deepest antiquity. (360 / 2Pi) = 57.29577951 arc-deg.

Area of a Circle = Pi X (r Squared) .. = 3.141592654 X (57.29577951 X 57.29577951) .. = 10313.24031 Square arc-deg.

So; E = (1620000 X 10313.24031) X (Half-Pi).

Half-Pi is an important constant .. because it describes the *right-angle* in terms of Radians-of-arc. Half-Pi * Radian(arc) = 90 arc-degrees, where there are_360_arc-deg on one circumference.

(3.141592654 / 2) X 57.29577951 = 90.

_______________________________

In the "ASM", the current ecliptic prime meridian "marker" is the Orion belt-star ALNITAK. Its Jan.1, 2000 Grid LAT is a decimal harmonic of .. Half-Pi. 15707.96327 = (3.141592654 / 2) X (10^4) .. = 25 (deg) X 17 (min) X 36.95991358 (sec) South of ecliptic.

( Morton, 1999, Internet).

The Grid LONG of any_prime meridian_in the "ASM" is designated as 360. (Munck, 1992, "The Code", self-published).

( http://www.pyramidmatrix.com)

For your info, the actual sidereal longitude of ALNITAK that I use, from which I calculate the "ASM" longitudes of all other sky-locations .. is .. 29 deg TAURUS 56' 50". "West ALNITAK" is clockwise from ALNITAK .. and "East ALNITAK" is counter-clockwise from ALNITAK. Notice that ALNITAK is_not_defined as exactly on the cusp of GEMINI / TAURUS .. but is 03 min 10 sec from that cusp, into TAURUS.

So; the Grid LONG of ALNITAK .. because it has the role of prime meridian "marker" .. is .. 360.

Therefore .. its Grid POINT Value in the "ASM" is .. (15707.96327 / 360) = 43.63323131

(Morton, 1999, Internet).

_______________________________

REGULUS and MINTAKA

MINTAKA is also a belt-star in Orion, as is ALNITAK. Positionally, MINTAKA (see R.Bauval) corresponds to The Mycerinus Pyramid of Giza .. the smaller of the 3 main Giza pyramids, while ALNITAK corresponds to The Great Pyramid. Of course, this is appropriate, because Munck (1992) found the current Earth prime meridian, in the "ASM", to be self-referentially indicated as passing through the center of The Great Pyramid of Giza.

MINTAKA has an "ASM" Grid POINT Value, as of Jan.1, 2000 .. of .. 31.00627668 .. a perfect match of (Pi Cubed). (Morton, 1999, Internet).

Notice the "decimal harmony" in-evidence .. with the "cesium light-speed factor" of 310.0627668 .. as I've been discussing in recent email postings.

Notice, now, the_ratio_of the "ASM" Jan.1, 2000 Grid POINT Values of REGULUS and MINTAKA .. (31.00627668 / 19.7392088) = 1.570796327 .. exactly Half-Pi.

This allows us to_recognize_another "E" substitution ..

E = [(Newark Earthworks) X (Area of a Circle)] / [(MINTAKA / REGULUS)].

_______________________________

GALACTIC CENTER / SOLAR APEX

As I've written previously on The Internet, I found the Jan.1, 2000 "ASM" Grid POINT Values of GALACTIC CENTER and SOLAR APEX, to be in an_exact_ratio of .. 12.5 .. or 1/2 the value of what my friend and colleague Gary Val Tenuta calls, "Alphanumeric Pi" .. 25. (P = 16, and i = 9 .. and their sum is 25).

Jan.1, 2000 GALACTIC CENTER .. 35.53057584 Jan.1, 2000 SOLAR APEX .. 2.842446068

(Morton, 2000, Internet).

(35.53057584 / 2.842446068) = 12.5

Notice the relationship between this_ratio_and the B.Cathie "etheric light-speed" in nautical miles per second ..

(162000 / 12.5) = 12960 .. HALF of the "ideal" Earth precession cycle .. 25920 .. in number of years.

MORE "E" Substitutions

E = [(Avebury^2) X (Pi^2) X (10^8) X (Washington Monument^2)] / (Rosslyn Ch^2).

Yes .. Avebury Circle's Grid POINT Value is .. 2.771815209 .. (Munck, 2000, "Whispers From Time II").

Washington Monument (in D.C.) has a Grid POINT Value of .. 5.411616169 .. (Morton, 1998, Internet).

Rosslyn Chapel's Grid POINT Value is .. 2.908882087 .. (Morton, 2000, Internet).

ALSO .. notice .. (Pi^2) X (10^8) = (5*REGULUS) X (10^7).

Again .. REGULUS of Jan.1, 2000 is 19.7392088, or .. (2Pi) X Pi.

Therefore .. I can now recognize an "E" substitution that doesn't even need Pi as an_overt_factor ..

E = [(5*REGULUS)*(10^7)*(Avebury^2)*(Washington Monument^2)] / (Ros Ch^2).

I also must mention that the 5.411616169 Grid POINT Value of Washington Monument is a_decimal harmonic_of the Grid LAT of Rosslyn Chapel .. 54116.16169 North .. = 55 (deg) X 51 (min) X 19.29274927 (sec) North. (Morton, 2000, Internet).

_______________________________

Using the Grid POINT Value of The Great Sphinx of Giza ..

E = 5400 X 12960 X 375.

This is where 5400 is the (Munck, 1992) Grid POINT Value of The Great Sphinx, and where 12960 is the "ideal" HALF-precession cycle of Earth.

The square root of 375 is a factor in the Grid LAT of The Great Sphinx. And, in turn, the square root of 375 exposes the factor of [Radian (deg) Squared] in the_same_Grid LAT .. 19.36491673 X (57.29577951* 57.29577951) = 63571.27163 North .. = 29 (deg) X 58 (min) X 37.79504853 (sec) North.

Note .. (25*15) = 375.

15 is the alphanumeric sum of .. "FACE". And .. 25 is the alphanumeric sum of .. "Pi".

So .. (Pi*Face) = 375.

(25 + 15) = 40 .. the Sumerian "Rank Number" of EN.KI.

Could this be a "clue" that THE FACE @ Cydonia on Mars is connected with the "Kingship/Queenship" legacy that has apparently descended from EN.KI. and NIN.HUR.SAG ? Is this also a "clue" to the expression: "Kingship was lowered from Heaven" ?

_______________________________

Using a decimal harmonic of 375 ... 37.5 .. the diameter of .. The Miami Circle, in regular feet !! ...

E = 5400 X 129600 X 37.5

129600 .. is the generic Surface Area on a TORUS .. where, again, 57.29577951 is the numerical value of the "given radius".

S.Area on a TORUS = (2Pi)^2 X (radius^2) .. = 39.4784176 X (57.29577951* 57.29577951) = 129600 Sq. arc-deg.

(Pi*Face) = (3.141592654*656.56127) = 2062.648063

2062.648063 = the side-length of "Miami Square" .. in regular feet !! (Morton, 1999, Internet).

So .. yes .. I've shown_two_(Pi*Face) values. One set is "alphanumeric".

(2062.648963 / 375) = (17.28 / Pi).

17.28 is a decimal harmonic of the Cube of 12.

1728 = (12*12*12).

The 1728 figure is useful when converting inches to feet, and vice-versa, when you are figuring volume .. in terms of "rectangular solids". ( Volume of a rectangular space = L * W * H ).

And .. 1728 is a gematrian number with the tangent of .. - 3.077683537

1728 is exactly 1/8th of the_Grid LAT_of Jan.1, 2000 POLARIS. (Morton, 1999, Internet).

(1728 X 8) = 13824 North of ecliptic .. = 66 (deg) X 05 (min) X 41.89090909 (sec) North of ecliptic.

What if I now_divide_1728 by 8 ?

(1728 / 8) = 216 .. 6*6*6 .. Cube of 6 .. decimal harmonic of the Jan.1, 2000 Grid POINT Value of POLARIS .. {21.6}.

(Morton, 1999, Internet)

_______________________________

Michael Lawrence Morton (c) 2001
http://mission-ignition.tripod.com/matrix/
http://hometown.aol.com/marscode/homepage1.html
http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm

P.S. For the applicable_database_of sidereal zodiac sky-positions .. ecliptically-based .. please go to ..

http://users.cwnet.com/~sidereal/mag/astfixst.htm

_______________________________

99.35.2 E = m (c^2) Substitutions; Using "ASM" Nodes (Peace2go)

Subj: E = m (c^2) Substitutions; Using "ASM" Nodes
Date: 08/16/2001
From: (Peace2go)
Email: Peace2go@aol.com

In a message dated 8/16/01 3:29:24 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Milamo writes:

"As I've written previously on The Internet, I found the Jan.1, 2000 "ASM" Grid POINT Values of GALACTIC CENTER and SOLAR APEX, to be in an_exact_ratio of .. 12.5 .. or 1/2 the value of what my friend and colleague Gary Val Tenuta calls, "Alphanumeric Pi" .. 25. (P = 16, and i = 9 .. and their sum is 25).

Jan.1, 2000 GALACTIC CENTER .. 35.53057584 Jan.1, 2000 SOLAR APEX .. 2.842446068

(Morton, 2000, Internet).

(35.53057584 / 2.842446068) = 12.5

Notice the relationship between this_ratio_and the B.Cathie "etheric light-speed" in nautical miles per second ..

(162000 / 12.5) = 12960 .. HALF of the "ideal" Earth precession cycle .. 25920 .. in number of years."

Michael,

With only a preliminary scan of your article, I have to say this is one of your more impressive presentations. It really shows the amount of data that you have accumulated over time and the amount of concentrated effort needed to make some of these startling connections. I appreciate the solid *work* that it reflects.

I've highlighted a portion of your article that may be of further significance. The term 12.5 reminded me of the significance that Leahy gives to the 1/8 ratio or .125. I'll give some specifics later, but just wanted to highlight that ratio for the record since it appears in your cosmic-level structural formula.

Best Regards,
Robert Friend

_______________________________

99.35.3 E = m (c^2) Substitutions; Using "ASM" Nodes (CodeUFO)

Subj: E = m (c^2) Substitutions; Using "ASM" Nodes
Date: 08/16/2001
From: (CodeUFO)
Email: CodeUFO@aol.com

In a message dated 08/16/2001 8:51:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Peace2go writes:

Subj: Re: E = m (c^2) Substitutions; Using "ASM" Nodes
Date: 08/16/2001 8:51:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: Peace2go
To: Milamo, Code UFO, TomBuoyed, MetPhys, JMason4557
To: JerryIuliano

In a message dated 8/16/01 3:29:24 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Milamo writes:

"As I've written previously on The Internet, I found the Jan.1, 2000 "ASM" Grid POINT Values of GALACTIC CENTER and SOLAR APEX, to be in an_exact_ratio of .. 12.5 .. or 1/2 the value of what my friend and colleague Gary Val Tenuta calls, "Alphanumeric Pi" .. 25. (P = 16, and i = 9 .. and their sum is 25).

Jan.1, 2000 GALACTIC CENTER .. 35.53057584 Jan.1, 2000 SOLAR APEX .. 2.842446068

(Morton, 2000, Internet).

(35.53057584 / 2.842446068) = 12.5

Notice the relationship between this_ratio_and the B.Cathie "etheric light-speed" in nautical miles per second ..

(162000 / 12.5) = 12960 .. HALF of the "ideal" Earth precession cycle .. 25920 .. in number of years."

Michael,

With only a preliminary scan of your article, I have to say this is one of your more impressive presentations. It really shows the amount of data that you have accumulated over time and the amount of concentrated effort needed to make some of these startling connections. I appreciate the solid *work* that it reflects.

I've highlighted a portion of your article that may be of further significance. The term 12.5 reminded me of the significance that Leahy gives to the 1/8 ratio or .125. I'll give some specifics later, but just wanted to highlight that ratio for the record since it appears in your cosmic-level structural formula.

Best Regards,
Robert Friend "

Much thanks, Robert.

The_8_is also referenced by 'The Nazca Spider' .. a spider having 8 appendages.

The Grid LONG of 'The Nazca Spider' is .. 106 (deg) X 15 (min) X 14.04057812 (sec) W.Giza .. = 22324.51921 W.Giza.

This is a_*match*_of the Grid LONG of Jan.1, 2000 REGULUS .. 22324.51921 E.ALNITAK .. = 65 (deg) X 08 (min) X 42.93176771 (sec) E.ALNITAK.

(Morton, 2001, 1999, Internet).

Note .. (8 X 22324.51921) = MINTAKA X 5760.

MINTAKA's Jan.1, 2000 Grid POINT Value = (Pi Cubed). Year 5760 is the year 2000 A.D. on the Hebrew Calendar (Nippurian .. begun @ 3760 B.C.)

So; you have, here, another "interaction" involving REGULUS and MINTAKA, this time also involving "year 2000" and the Hebrew Calendar.

-- M.L.Morton

P.S. Further .. 25 = (7.957747155 X Pi).

7.957747155 is the "Orion Belt-star Composite Ratio" .. (ALNITAK X MINTAKA) / ALNILAM .. = [(43.63323131 X 31.00627668) / 170.010936] = 7.957747155

All 3 Orion belt-stars @ Jan.1, 2000 .. !!! Awesome .. truly !!

-- M.L.Morton

Page 35

Sections List- 99 Electrons and Mythologies
Impossible Correspondence Index