99.38.1 Re: "Arecibo" crop formation .. and more .. (TomBuoyed) 

Page 38

Sections List- 99 Electrons and Mythologies
Impossible Correspondence Index

Subj: Re: "Arecibo" crop formation .. and more ..
Date: 08/24/2001
From: (TomBuoyed)
Email: TomBuoyed@aol.com

Great stuff, Michael! Things are really popping loose now. What about the next circle after the Face & Arecibo formation --- which is a double-nested "Vesica Piscis" formation. Let's do the math & sacred geometry thereof.

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2001/Shoreham/shoreham2001a.html

Tom

_______________________________

99.38.2 GUT MU-27 (MetPhys) 

Subj: GUT MU-27
Date: 08/23/2001
From: (MetPhys)
Email: MetPhys@aol.com

( http://members.tripod.com/stemy27/tablea1.gif )

This Theory demonstrates a universe as cubic cells. These cubic cells have a corresponding sphere like unto

The squaring of the circle
My ECU's (Energy / Consciousness Units) ( http://hometown.aol.com/MetPhys/101suntzolkin.html )
Joe Mason's (JMason4557@aol.com) CU's Consciousness Units ( http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm )

GUT MU-27 by Alexander E. Muvrin ( http://members.tripod.com/stemy27/title.html )
Use of the words "stem cell" = (s)pace, (t)ime, (e)nergy, (m)atter

Tables ( http://members.tripod.com/stemy27/tables.html )

Creation, structure, evolution, age of universe ( http://members.tripod.com/stemy27/tablea1.html )
Big Bang ( http://members.tripod.com/stemy27/tableb1.html )
Sonoluminescence and Life Sequence ( http://members.tripod.com/stemy27/tablec1.html )
Atoms ( http://members.tripod.com/stemy27/tabled1.html )
Nuclei ( http://members.tripod.com/stemy27/tablee1.html )
Earth-Moon System ( http://members.tripod.com/stemy27/tablef1.html )

This GUT theory is essentially cubic of 27 levels. It says that space is a cubic series and I add, like unto magic cubes. In other words, a 3 x 3 x 3 cube.

This cubic magic square / magic sphere (actually torus) theory should have direct and precise correspondence, correlation and connection to the

Archaeo-sky Matrix of Michael Morton ( http://hometown.aol.com/MetPhys/99Aelectrons.html )
The 27 levels of electrons- Jerry Iuliano ( http://hometown.aol.com/MetPhys/99Aelectrons.html )
The 26 levels of Temporal Reality- T. McKenna ( http://hometown.aol.com/MetPhys/99PPelectrons.html ) Section 99.42.3
The Double Octave of Music- 13 and 13 = 26

The relationships found include gematric numbers such as the 9 cells from proton, thru the range of weak force to electron as follows, in GeVolts:

1, 3, 9, 27, 81, 243, 729, 2187 and 6561 GeV.

Also found Cubic numbers: 1, 27, 729, 19 683 and 531 441 and similar Linear and Linear-cubic numbers of 13 cells of a big bang cosmogony. The BB theory isn't what we think it is.

These ratios are the Triple Square progressions of Plato's Tetraktys. Furthermore, the fine structure constant is defined as 1 / 137 stem cells and the Primordial stem cell is defined as the 531 144 stems cells of the primordial energy fluctuation, both being very gematric, or geometric numbers.

( http://members.tripod.com/stemy27/tabled1.gif )
The radius of the cesium atom is shown to expand as a Rydberg atom, like unto the mechanism I sent to you last week from ( http://hometown.aol.com//MetPhys/12rydbergatoms.html )

MetPhys@aol.com
Impossible Correspondence ( http://hometown.aol.com/MetPhys/metaphysicshome.html )

_______________________________

99.38.3 Re: UK Crop Forms/Face/Eltanin-Antenna Correlations (MetPhys) 

Subj: Re: UK Crop Forms/Face/Eltanin-Antenna Correlations
Date: 08/25/2001
From: (MetPhys)
Email: MetPhys@aol.com

In a message dated 8/26/1 3:23:24 AM, you wrote:

Chilbolton Radio Telescope

To all,

I deduced some years ago, from my observations of bifilar counterwound coils upon a core and bifilar wound toroidal fields around a center, that a scalar component seems to occupy the axis (core-center) as a focused beam of invisible energy. Only after years of keeping this in mind, did I connect this scalar with the antennas that I noticed were often pointing straight up in the air, like unto the Chilbolton Radio Telescope at the time of this latest "face glyph" and the "rectilinear code glyph".

After making these observations about scalar (1998) I began to wonder why observed antenna choose a seemingly perfect vertical alignment. Upon reading a book about the Montauk Point facility, I learned that the scalar component transmitted exactly opposite out the back of the dish-antenna in opposition to the EM component out the front of the dish-antenna with the focused beam scalar injuring several personnel unwary of how dangerous it was, walking in back of the antenna.

So the conclusion of this is to ask, based upon the assumption that the Chilbolton Radio Antenna has a scalar component emitting from the back of it, is this- "If it is transmitting scalar into the center of the earth or beyond, what point is beyond the earth center on the other side of the earth's surface?" I hope it is the Eltanin Antenna! Someone please let us know what is the exactly opposite GPV (Grid Point Value) to the Chilbolton Antenna.

If the antenna is reflecting off the center of the earth it implies an ability to use that scalar as it returns at or near the antenna, namely Great Britain. If the Chilbolton Antenna is declinated to any degree it may have the capability to transmit scalar to another location as it is reflected off the inner mantle or inner cores of the earth.

To check this hypotheses it would be necessary to monitor all known antenna for the declination angles at the time of notable crop formations to calculate angle of incidence and angle of reflection. If the connection can be made between antenna declination and the times of crop formations, we will know the cause of the formations.

MetPhys@aol.com

_______________________________

99.38.4 UK Crop Forms/Face/Eltanin-Antenna Correlations (MLM) 
From Michael,
Subj: UK Crop Forms/Face/Eltanin-Antenna Correlations
Date: 8.26/01

This article will examine certain specific, precise correlations that I have now observed and discovered, among :

1) The Chilbolton, UK, "Arecibo" crop formation of August 2001.
2) The "Chilbolton Radio Telescope" crop formation of *one year prior* .. August of 2000.
3) THE FACE @ Cydonia on Mars.
4) The "Eltanin Antenna" on the ocean-floor off South America.
5) Certain centered locations of specific buildings in Washington, D.C.
6) The "synchrony" of a certain_event_in Washington, D.C.
7) The generic Area of a Square.
8) The generic Surface Area on a Sphere.
9) The generic Volume of a Sphere.

The "Eltanin Antenna"

In his book, "The Harmonic Conquest of Space", on page 12, Bruce Cathie gives his figures for the location, on the ocean-floor, to the WSW off the tip of South America .. of an_antenna_discovered by a U.S. survey-ship ("The Eltanin") using a remote camera .. planted at an approximate depth of 13,500 feet. This discovery occurred in 1964.

I have now identified this location, based directly on Bruce Cathie's latitude and longitude figures for the_exact_position of this 'antenna' .. as a significant "ASM" (Archaeo-sky Matrix) *node*. (Morton, 2001, Internet).

Here, again, are my "ASM" figures for this location ..

Grid LAT Eltanin Antenna .. 59 (deg) X 09 (min) X 17.98360939 (sec) South .. = 9549.296586 South.

Grid LONG Eltanin Antenna ..136 (deg) X 07 (min) X 24.88135563 (sec) W.Giza .. = 23687.05056 W.Giza. [ W.Greenwich .. 104 deg 59 min 24.08135563 sec ].

Grid POINT Value Eltanin Antenna .. 23687.05056 / 9549.296586 = 2.480502134

Note : 2.480502134 is a decimal harmonic of the Grid POINT Value of The Great Pyramid of Giza, in the "ASM". (248.0502134) .. (Munck, 1992, "The Code", self-published).

The "Arecibo-Reply" Crop Formation Of August, 2001

I very recently posted an email-article on The Internet, giving my "ASM" figures for the apparent "exactly-intended" placement (centered) of what has become known as the "Arecibo-Reply" crop formation .. located very near the Chilbolton Radio Telescope installation in Hampshire, UK.

Here, again, are those "ASM" figures .. (Morton, 2001, Internet) ..

Grid LAT .. 51 (deg) X 08 (min) X 39.58113342 (sec) North .. = 16149.10243 North.

Grid LONG .. 32 (deg) X 34 (min) X 18.61213235 (sec) W.Giza .. = 20250 W.Giza. [ W.Greenwich .. 01 deg 26 min 17.81213235 sec ].

Grid POINT Value .. 20250 / 16149.10243 = 1.253939659

"Our" Conventional 360 Arc-degrees System

We say that our use of 360 arc-degrees on one complete circumference is .. "conventional" .. and that's true. But as to where the "conventional" 360 degrees on a circle "came from" .. has always been open for pure speculation. Indeed .. it's been a longtime mystery. But the works of Zecharia Sitchin, Neil Freer, Laurence Gardner, Carl Munck, and myself .. have produced solid evidence indicating that "we" Earth humans were_given_or "handed-down", if you will .. the 360 system, by advanced *people* .. in very deep antiquity (in so-called "pre-history"). As to where those *advanced people* in "pre-history" got the 360 system .. is yet another layer of the great onion. But we need to at least begin, or start, from "where we are" .. in what is looking more-and-more like a very exhilarating, paradigm-changing process of collective self-discovery on a planetary-species level.

If you use, or assume .. 360 arc-degrees on one complete circumference, you can_then_calculate certain numerical_values_involving the geometries of things .. based on a Radian-Arc (constant) of ... (360 / 2Pi) = 57.29577951 arc-degrees. That figure shows up very frequently in the "ASM" itself. So .. along with the Pi constant, the numerical_value_of the 57.29577951 arc-degrees *Radian-Arc constant* .. is very prominent in the "ASM". And; the value 360, itself, is very prominent as well.

The Location of THE FACE @ Cydonia on Mars

In 1992, Carl P.Munck, Sr. self-published his first volume of what he calls, "The Code" .. or, "Pyramid Matrix". Included in that first volume of "The Code", was his location for the center ("nose") of THE FACE @ Cydonia. Here are the figures he found for it ..

Grid LAT .. 41 (deg) X 11 (min) X 10.03080581 (sec) North .. = 4523.893421 North.

Grid LONG .. 6.890283706 (min) E.CYDONIA. [ Munck found the self-evident prime meridian indicated as passing through the center of The D&M Pyramid @ Cydonia ].

Grid POINT Value .. 4523.893421 / 6.890283706 = 656.56127

A New "ASM" Correlation

This "new" ASM correlation is a direct result of an apparently-advanced intelligence .. intentionally_placing_(centering) the very recent (as I write this) "Arecibo-Reply" crop formation .. to_correlate_mathematically .. with the centered location for THE FACE @ Cydonia on Mars .. as self-published by Munck in 1992. Not only that .. this apparently-intended, centered placement of the "Arecibo-Reply" crop formation is correlating to THE FACE @ Cydonia on Mars_via_the Pi constant AND, simultaneously_via_the 57.29577951 arc-degrees numerical_value_of The Radian-Arc, assuming a circumference of 360 arc-degrees.

Here is the simple equation, which I discovered, that shows this correlation :

(9549.296586 X 1.253939659 X 3.141592654) / 57.29577951 = 656.56127

Yes !! This_does_directly involve the "ASM" Grid LAT of the exact placement of the "Eltanin Antenna" .. which I discussed earlier in this article.

Of course .. 3.141592654 .. is the Pi constant, to 9 decimal places.

_______________________________

Generic Area of a Square .. a Correlation

Substituting the 57.29577951 figure in place of the "given radius" .. in the standard math formulas for various Areas and Volumes of certain geometric forms .. is proving to resonate (correlate) very significantly with key "ASM" figures. One of these parameters is the generic Area of a Square. Notice that_both_the "Arecibo-Reply" and the "Crop-Face" formations (recently, next to the Chilbolton Radio Telescope installation), were of_rectangular_shape (their frames). What is the "perfect rectangle" ? The Square, of course .. just as the "perfect arc" is the Circle.

On a Square .. its side-length would be_double_the radius of a comparable Circle. So .. to find the "generic" Area of a Square .. you follow the standard math formula .. L X W. The length and width of a Square are equal. So .. (2 X 57.29577951) X (2 X 57.29577951) = 13131.2254 Sq. arc-deg.

For now .. I'm going to offer the speculation that the Area of the "Crop-Face" is_numerically_equal to the Grid LAT of the "Eltanin Antenna". That is .. the figure .. 9549.296586 .. I am speculating .. based directly on what I heard Richard Hoagland say last night (as I write this) on the Art Bell "Coast-to-Coast AM" talk-radio show. I heard Richard say that the dimensions (approximate, I wonder ?) of the "Crop-Face" are .. as told to him by Michael Glickman, apparently .. 120 feet by "70-something-almost 80" feet. What_would_be .. keeping in mind that this is speculation at this point, until we get confirmation .. what_would_be the width of the "Crop-Face" .. assuming an area_numerically_equal to the "Eltanin Antenna" Grid LAT, AND assuming a length of 120 feet ? (9549.296586 / 120) = 79.57747155 feet for the width.

Why am I excited by that possibility ?

I'm excited about that possibility, because .. 79.57747155 .. is a decimal harmonic of .. 7.957747155 .. the "Orion Belt-star Composite Ratio" .. (Morton, 2001, Internet). That figure is the result of .. (ALNITAK X MINTAKA) / ALNILAM .. @ Jan.1, 2000 .. the sky-locations of the Orion belt-stars in the "ASM" .. according to their Grid POINT Values as of Jan.1, 2000 .. (43.63323131 X 31.00627668) / 170.010936 = 7.957747155

Of course .. I'm_also_excited about this possibility .. just because 9549.296586 is the Grid LAT (South) of the "Eltanin Antenna !!

_______________________________

"RE-Finding" Last Year's (2000) "Chilbolton" Grid POINT Value

I'll give you, here, my "ASM" figures for last-year's August, 2000, "Chilbolton Radio Telescope" crop formation .. (Morton, 2000, Internet) ..

Grid LAT .. 51 (deg) X 08 (min) X 36.39967169 (sec) North .. = 14851.06605 North.

Grid LONG .. 32 (deg) X 34 (min) X 23.82352941 (sec) W.Giza .. = 25920 W.Giza. [ W.Greenwich 01 deg 26 min 23.02352941 sec ].

Grid POINT Value .. 25920 / 14851.06605 = 1.745329252

_______________________________

Note: 1.745329252 .. is a decimal harmonic of the_reciprocal_of the Radian (deg) value 57.29577951 .. (1 / 57.29577951) = 0.01745329252

Now .. notice this equation ..

(13131.2254 / 9549.296586) = (1.745329252 X 0.787873524).

Recall, please .. that 13131.2254 .. is the generic Area of a Square. 0.787873524 .. is a decimal harmonic of the generic Volume of a Sphere.

Using the standard math formula for Volume of a Sphere .. (4Pi / 3) X (radius Cubed) .. = 4.188790205 X (57.29577951 ^ 3) .. = 787873.524 Cubic arc-deg.

"ASM" Grid POINT Value of The White House

In 1998, I found the_centered_Grid POINT Value ("ASM") for The White House in Washington, D.C. .. to be .. 7.87873524 .. (Morton, 1998, Internet). Here are the "ASM" figures I found ..

Grid LAT .. 38 (deg) X 53 (min) X 51.4796425 (sec) North .. = 103680 North.

Grid LONG .. 108 (deg) X 10 (min) X 12.18469679 (sec) W.Giza .. = 13159.47253 W.Giza. [ W.Greenwich 77 deg 02 min 11.38469679 sec ]

Grid POINT Value .. 103680 / 13159.47253 = 7.87873524

Recall New Year's Eve of 1999/2000

The Clintons were on live national TV on New Year's Eve of 1999/2000, and at the stroke of midnight, The Washington Monument appeared to "burst" into an incredibly bright, white-light display. The scaffolding around The Washington Monument (for renovation work) had been fitted with some sort of "pyrotechnic" surprise .. timed for midnight. Also at midnight, SIRIUS was 'appearing' to cross the sky-meridian .. 33 degrees above the horizon over Washington, D.C. !! { See the series of articles by Mike Bara, on TEM website .. http://www.enterprisemission.com .. "Has the 'End of Days' Begun?" }.

I posted this equation on The Internet, almost a year ago .. (Morton, 2000, Internet) ..

(2.368705056 / 5.411616169) X (360 /2000) = 0.0787873524

It describes, in numbers, that very *event/moment* .. at midnight on New Year's Eve of 1999/2000 .. at the change of the millennium at Washington, D.C., with SIRIUS "crossing" the sky-meridian .. at 33 degrees above the horizon. 2.368705056 is the_Jan.1, 2000_"ASM" Grid POINT Value of SIRIUS !! (Morton, 1999, Internet). 5.411616169 .. is the Grid POINT of the_centered_location of .. The Washington Monument ! (Morton, 1998, Internet).

360 is "our" ancient (very ancient) figure for the number of arc-degrees on one circumference. And 2000, of course, is the calendar_year_"we" were then beginning .. signaled by that "crossing" of the sky-meridian by SIRIUS. And Jan.1, 2000 is the date at which time all of the *sky-positions* in the "ASM" are synchronized_mathematically_(Morton, 1999, Internet) .. relative to the ecliptic_and_relative to the ecliptic prime meridian that "appears", from Earth, to pass through the Orion belt-star ALNITAK. 0.0787873524 .. is a decimal harmonic of The White House Grid POINT Value of 7.87873524 .. of 0.787873524, as described a bit earlier, and, of 787873.524 .. the generic Volume of a Sphere.

_______________________________

I also have found that a certain decimal harmonic of the generic Surface Area on a Sphere .. provides the following nice, direct relationship among 3 of the "entities" I have been discussing in this article. Please notice the following equation ..

(412.5296125 / 0.787873524) = (656.56127 / 1.253939659).

Three of those terms .. I will assume you can recognize from what I've shown earlier in this article. 412.5296125 is a decimal harmonic of the generic Surface Area of a Sphere;

(4Pi) X (radius Squared) .. = 12.56637061 X (57.29577951 ^ 2) .. = 41252.96125 Sq. arc-deg.

412.5296125 is_also_what I have proposed (Morton, 1998, Internet) as the precisely-intended length of "The King's Chamber" floor within The Great Pyramid of Giza .. in terms of *regular* ("British") inches !! Not only that .. but I have also proposed (Morton, 1998, Internet) that this 412.5296125 length, in *regular* inches .. is_precisely_equivalent to 20 Royal Cubits !! That is .. I have proposed that it was, and still is, intended .. by the designers/creators/builders of The Great Pyramid and many other marvelous structures .. that The Royal Cubit is_equivalent_to exactly .. 20.62648063 regular ("British") inches. Why ? Because .. the creators/designers were_using_the 360 arc-degrees system .. and they apparently used a decimal harmonic of the generic Surface Area on a Hemisphere .. 20626.48063 is_HALF_of 41252.96125 .. as the_basis_for the length of The Royal Cubit .. in units of_actual_length that were precisely equal to the regular British inch length !!

412.5296125 regular inches is equivalent to 34.37746771 regular feet.

34.37746771 is a decimal harmonic of .. 3437.7746771 .. *nautical miles*, the polar_radius_of Earth, itself.

-- Michael Lawrence Morton (c) 2001
http://mission-ignition.tripod.com/matrix/
http://hometown.aol.com/marscode/homepage1.html
http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm

_______________________________

99.38.5 Re: "ASM" Synchs for "Arecibo"_and_"Chilbolton 2000" .. (TomBuoyed) 

Subj: Re: "ASM" Synchs for "Arecibo"_and_"Chilbolton 2000" ..
Date: 08/24/2001
From: (TomBuoyed)
Email: TomBuoyed@aol.com

Michael,

Thanks for more good numbers to chew on! As Jerry Iuliano points out, 666 arises as the extreme number in the proportion: 2 : 36 : : 37 : 666.

36 is the number of stability while 37 is that of instability. You might say that the mean or average of the product (not sum) of order and chaos is 666 since 36*37/2 = 666

As for the Face and Arecibo crop rectangles (not just circles anymore!), I am struck by the age of the male figure in the Face. He looks about 20 years old to me; whereas the Face at Cydonia looks to be a guy 40-45 years old. I wonder if this is a young version of the Cydonia Face?

Then I was struck by the placement of these rectangles in the fields in view of the parallel tram lines. I hope someone will give a reading of the angle the rectangles make with the North magnetic Pole line.

I looked at the angle the Face rectangle makes with the tram lines and it looks about 8 to 10 degrees. However, the angle of the Arecibo rectangle seems to be very close to 45* or a perfect diagonal across the tram lines.

I don't know how significant it is, but the angles of the major axes should be important, especially since we are now witnessing rectangular formations. Perhaps something about "squaring the circle" is a coming new motif, as the Cheops pyramid "squares the circle" in its height to base leg ratio.

Tom

_______________________________

99.38.6 Stonehenge-Cheops pyramid (Jerry Iulaino) 

Subj: Stonehenge-Cheops pyramid
Date: 08/24/2001
From: (Jerry Iulaino)
Email: Jerryiulaino@aol.com

MP

STONEHENGE.

The Stonehenge observatory, situated on the Salisbury plains of Southern England, remains one of the foremost mysteries of antiquity and there have been countless attempts to coax it into giving up its secrets. For the most part, it has stubbornly retained them and the final, defeatist conclusion of many researchers, who came to do analytical battle, is that we will never truly know what the site was for. Stonehenge is a very sophisticated standing stone circle, which contains the sum total of knowledge found upon the Great Pyramid, Khafre and Menkaure. Its pedigree is indelibly linked back to those magnificent structures. Whoever built Stonehenge was utterly conversant with the age-old mathematical formulas, geodetic navigational systems, astronomical methodologies and measurement standards found upon the Giza Plateau of ancient Egypt. With the mass exodus of pre-Dynastic inhabitants of Egypt, seeking more verdant homelands in Western Europe, their cherished knowledge migrated with them. In 3 locations of the Brittany heathland of France they erected rows of menhir standing stones, some huge (Er Grah...Le Grand Menhir Brisˇ...70 feet tall), and placed them in carefully coded positions. One of these massive, ambitious undertakings occurred at Le M¸nec (Carnac) where 1100 stones were placed in adjacent lines.

This site, along with those of Kerlescan and Kermario, would act as an eternal library of coded information for the newly arrived residents of Western Europe, throughout all of the generations to follow. A short distance away, across the expanse of water known today as the English Channel, another ambitious project was initiated to erect the Stonehenge monument. Suitable, durable bluestone was acquired from the Presely Hills in Dyfed, South Wales and shipped across the Severn Estuary to Wiltshire, Southern England. Additionally, in excess of 75 heavy sandstone blocks were fashioned in the vicinity of Marlborough, then, also, transported overland or by waterways to Wiltshire. Yet other types of stone were acquired from varied locations and trees were cut down to provide multiples of wooden posts. With the final acquisition of all sought after materials the erection of, what would become, one of the great, lingering mysteries of all time commenced. Conventional archaeological opinion accepts that the Stonehenge monument was built over a period of, perhaps, 1400 years beginning in 3000BC.

This conclusion appears to be largely based upon carbon dating of component post residues or antler digging tools and the like, found in the postholes. The posts, which were an integral and highly important part of the observatory, had a "use by" date and would rarely have lasted more than a century before requiring replacement. It's very likely that the archaeologists are getting mixed up about what constitutes a stage of development and what was, simply, ongoing maintenance. The fact is that the Stonehenge site is a massive static computer and, for the most part, all components needed to be in place at pretty much the same time for the computer to work. There might have been a first stage that used bluestones and Aubrey Circle posts, but it's doubtful it would have persisted for very long. The Stonehenge monument was set up specifically to preserve the sophisticated knowledge that had been brought from the former homeland in Egypt. It was, therefore, important to build the site within a reasonable time-span and encrypt the ancient codes quickly, lest they slip from memory and be forgotten. Let's now start analyzing the site ring by ring and component part by component part.

Figure 1: The blue circle is the Aubrey Circle, with a diameter of 288 feet. This diameter is exactly the intended, diagonal face length of the Menkaure Pyramid, from the base to the apex point. The distance (288 feet) is also of the 576 feet of diagonal face length from the base of the Great Pyramid to the height of the altar floor. The base perimeter of the Great Pyramid was exactly 288 reeds (of 10.5 feet each). The Giza Plateau was set out as a grid of 288 squares, each 189 feet X 189 feet (1/4th of the length of the Great Pyramid was 189 feet). The grid ran 18 squares east-west & 16 squares north-south. In Numbers chapter 7 of the Bible, Moses is given a total of 288 gifts. The Bible is packed with astronomical codes, which aspect is, of times, the sole preoccupation of an entire Biblical passage. Herodotus, the father of profane history, left us solid clues that the Pyramid acre was 28800 square feet. The Geomancer's mile of Great Britain was 57600 feet (28800 X 2). The Waitapu standing stone circle site in New Zealand was a dual, overlapping circle observatory, wherein the north-south extremities of the site extended through 288 feet, geometrically. The Aubrey Circle represented the beginning point from which the rest of the Stonehenge observatory was mathematically conceived and 288 feet was the foundation number. All of the PHI circles and squares of Stonehenge were either a PHI ratio increase or PHI ratio reduction of the Aubrey Circle. Let's now introduce the other PHI circles in the series.

Figure 2: Once the Aubrey Circle (at 288 feet of diameter) was in place it was subjected to a PHI ratio increase to produce the next circle markers outward...288 feet X 1.6180339 (PHI) = 465.9937632 feet (466). It will be noted that this enlarged circle falls to the extremity of the majority of the Stonehenge site. However, it is clearly marked by 2 components on the Avenue. This code alludes, in part or symbolically, to the 46.5 pyr. acre figure found on the Khafre Pyramid, which was dedicated to 1/4th of the 18.613- year lunar nutation cycle. The 466 figure crops up as an important part of the PHI progression (based upon 288) in some artefacts, like the 3rd increment of a Dynastic Egyptian Royal Cubit. It is also a part of the PHI coded measurements found at the Crosshouse of Miringa te Kakara in New Zealand (ref. Articles 4 to 5 of this website). This circle diameter was extremely important in that it was exactly 172.8 Megalithic Yards (of 32.360678 inches each). The Great Pyramid perimeter value was 1728 Royal Cubits (of 21 inches each); Silbury Hill was intended to code a circumference of 1728 feet; The outer rim circumference of the Sarsen Circle was 345.6 feet, which is 172.8 X 2; The Crosshouse at Miringa te Kakara in New Zealand worked to a circumference of 172.8 feet. The huge standing stone row site of Le M¸nec worked on the basis of 1728 Megalithic Yards. The 1728 code related primarily to world navigation, using a sexagesimal circumference code in conjunction with a "league" diameter code.

Figure 3: The 3rd segment of this Dynastic Egyptian Royal Cubit codes 4.66 inches in the diameter of a circle generated from the bottom left corner of the rod. Note how the 1st segment codes PHI & the 2nd segment codes PI. These rods were, primarily, for mnemonic reference to the size of the Earth in their full lengths. Any trades person would quickly discover that the rod, here shown, couldn't be utilized as a measuring rod in construction work, as the individual segments are not in ratio with each other. The totality of the rod appears to be a memory device, related to the most important numbers of antiquity. The 466 feet diameter circle was directly related to the size of the Earth under its PHI geodetic assignment. Remember, the formula for determining the "ring of the Earth" was to take the vertical height of the Great Pyramid, according to its PHI assignment of 168 Megalithic Yards (453.049492 feet) and divide this value by the length of the top altar floor (22 feet...full length = 44 feet). The result was 453.049492 Ö 22 = 20.59315873 (this value read in inches was the length of the "PHI-coded" Dynastic Egyptian Cubit. This length was then multiplied by 1200...(20.59315873 X 1200) = 24,711.79047 (read as miles of 5280 feet each to describe the "ring of the Earth" under the PHI geodetic .........

http://www.celticnz.com

AL:

Secrets of the Great Pyramid

The following excerpt is reprinted from "Signs and Symbols of Primordial Man" by Albert Churchward, a student of the European Egyptologist Gerald Massey. According to John Henrik Clarke, in his introduction to the volume, "(Massey)" was an agnostic whose intention was to prove that the basis of European culture was created outside of Europe by people that some Europeans later characterized as savages without a history or culture. His search led him to Egypt where he found proof that Western culture was, in fact, African in origin, the larger portion of it coming from the Nile Valley. . ." About the Pyramid of Giza, built by ancient Africans, Churchward writes: The Great Pyramid, when understood, far surpasses and ellipses King Solomon's Temple as a building, or any other in the world. . . The base is a true square, and perfectly oriented, set due N.E.S.W., parallel with the equatorial line, absolutely no variation of points; its base on huge rock and that rock perfectly and truly hewn and leveled (sic) to the earth's curvature of 8 inches to the mile, the importance of which is evident-keeping it from convulsive damages as time goes on. The height of the pyramid is ....486.256 feet...., and each side is ....763.81 feet..... The height thus measures, with the radius of a circle whose circumference equals the four sides. . .showing that the circle could be squared by these ancient architects which has not been improved on since. Its base side length is 365.242 sacred cubits, showing the number of days and fractional part of a day in a year. . . Here, in the Great Pyramid, is the one material centre (sic) which gives the standard for those practical things-weights, measures, etc., and these were carried from land to lands, with the utmost care by the Priests who left Egypt, no doubt for some future purpose under divine will, which is not yet apparent. The builders of the Pyramid were masters of Astronomical and Geographical science, and it contains the minute measurements of the earth and heaven, far exceeding the scientific knowledge of any man in our own time, and this knowledge and the secrets thereof were known to the High Priests, and they carried their knowledge wherever they went. The Ark of the Covenant, built in the wilderness by Moses, Noah's Ark and King Solomon's Temple, all bear a true decimal proportion to the Pyramid, and the "Ark" or "Sarcophagus" in the King's chamber within the Pyramid.

Note: Another source of information on the contributions of Africans to the Nile Valley is "Egypt-Child of Africa", edited by Ivan Van Sertima.

A demonstration of the Cheops pyramid constructs deriving the values of the proton,neutron, electron and fine-structure constant:

p=proton=NIST 1998 value= 938.271998 Mev/(c^2)

n=neutron=NIST 1998 value=939.56533 Mev/(c^2)

e=electron=NIST 1998 value=.510998902 Mev/(c^2)

a(em)=fine-structure constant=NIST 1998 value=1/137.03599976

Cheops pyramid height=486.256 ft

Cheops pyramid base leg=763.81 ft:

[(10^(486.2560886/763.81))/.37]^4=((p+n)*10)+e

To derive fine-structure constant:

[(10^(486.2560886/763.81)/.37]^2=137.0360693(Quantum Hall)

Book of Revelations:(144,666):

[(10^486.2560886/763.81))/.37]=(10^(143.999991997/37))/666

Platonic cycle:(25920):

143.999991997*6660/37=25919.99854

Leahy,Abrahamic number:(82944): (143.999991997*666*32/37=82943.99533

To derive a very accurate approximation of the fine-structure constant, substitute the Cheops constructs into the Hebrew-Talmud........"288 sparks from broken vessels":

(288^(486.2560886/763.81))/(10^2)=COS 137.0359996129...

which is 99.999999973 of 1998 NIST value:

137.0359996129/137.03599976=.99999999973

Concerning Stonehenge constructs....The Aubrey Holes (56 total) encircle an area of 6660 square English yards. A hexagon inscribed within the bank has as area of 7400 square English yards...(from the book, City of Revelation, by G. Michell... These number forms demonstrate the natural log e (2.718281828..) to nine decimals as follows:

[1/[(10^(288.0000929/74))/56/100]]+2=2.71828182877...

A Gilson type formula involving both cosines and tangents in radians with the ratio of Cheops pyramid constructs:

1/sqrt[(COS(TAN(486.2580172/763.81)))*10]=COS137.03599976

The complex number square root of negative 1...(i)...

= -1^(1/2).. has a connection to Cheops constructs through fine-structure and natural log e:

i^(i*486.256/763.81)=COS 137.0360084

1/[i^(i*486.2565482/763.81)]=2.718281828...=e

i^i=.207879576...

(i^i)^(486.256/763.81)=COS 137.0360084

1/[(i^i)^(486.2565482/763.81)]=2.718281828...=e

J.Iuliano

My interpretation of the recent Milk hill crop circle:

409 total circles
6 spirals
13 total circles in each spiral
409-(13*6)=331
331- one central circle=330

The collective unconscious ratio=33/37=.891891891...

144/37=3.89189189
70/37=1.891891891
1260/666=70/37=1.891891891

To create the fine structure constant:
[(10^(32.99998792/37))/.666]^-2=1/137.03599976

J.Iuliano

_______________________________

99.38.7 Square forms (Peace2go) 

Subj: Square forms
Date: 08/25/2001
From: (Peace2go)
Email: Peace2go@aol.com

In a message dated 8/24/01 1:50:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time, TomBuoyed writes:

I don't know how significant it is, but the angles of the major axes should be important, especially since we are now witnessing rectangular formations. Perhaps something about "squaring the circle" is a coming new motif, as the Cheops pyramid "squares the circle" in its height to base leg ratio.

It's good that Tom has noticed a "coming new motif" involving rectilinear shapes. I submit that this "unnatural" motif is a clue to pay closer attention to our reactions to the images. Already I see references made to "squares" in the so-called Aricibo and Face formations. As Tom has noticed, the frame for the Face is *not* rectilinear and the "pixels" are not identical to the binary-digit computer generated imagery that we are more more familiar with. Until closer examination and ground evidence comes in, this actually suggests that the Face is genuine since it keeps the same geometric pattern. Outside of the seemingly intentional copy of the man-made version of interstellar code in the "Aricibo" formation, I don't recall any other examples of rectilinear frames in the crop circle catalogue. Not being a student of crop circles, I could easily be wrong on this point and will study the archives looking for this feature.

I base the term "unnatural" on Buckminster Fuller's conclusion that nature is not operating in perpendicular and parallel directions but in radial growth patterns of convergence and divergence. Radial patterns have been the hallmark of crop circles so far.

Any comments appreciated.

Regards, Robert Friend

_______________________________

99.38.8 Torus as 2 Squared Circles (TomBuoyed) 

Subj: Torus as 2 Squared Circles
Date: 08/26/2001
From: (TomBuoyed)
Email: TomBuoyed@aol.com

In a message dated 8/25/2001 9:23:24 PM, Milamo writes:

On a Square .. its side-length would be_double_the radius of a comparable Circle. So .. to find the "generic" Area of a Square .. you follow the standard math formula .. L X W. The length and width of a Square are equal. So .. (2 X 57.29577951) X (2 X 57.29577951) = 13131.2254 Sq. arc-deg.

Michael,

Don't forget the torus here which incorporates the squaring of the circle in a most elegant way.

Recall the formula for surface area of the torus whose loop radius is equal to the tube radius. It is 4*(PI^2)*(R^2)

Using your generic radius of 180/PI, the surface area of the torus is 129600.

But go back to the general formula. Suppose you take the square root of the torus area:

sqrt[4*(PI^2)*(R^2)] = 2*PI*R

What is this length but the circumference of a circle of radius R. Suppose you now cut that circle open and stretch it out into a straight line. You then get a length equal to the circumference. If you take another circle and stretch it out at right angles to the first, you get a square whose sides are 2*PI*R and the area of this square equals the surface area of the torus.

Using your generic radius, each side of the square is, of course, 360.

Therefore, the surface area of the torus is equal to the area of a square whose sides are the straightened circumference of the 2 circles (tube and loop) which make up the torus.

360 x 360 =129600

Tom

_______________________________

99.38.9 Re: UK Crop Forms/Face/Eltanin-Antenna Correlations (MLM) 

Subj: Re: UK Crop Forms/Face/Eltanin-Antenna Correlations
Date: 08/26/2001
From: (MLM)
Email: Milamo@aol.com

In a message dated 08/25/2001 9:13:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time, MetPhys writes:

Someone please let us know what is the exactly opposite GPV (Grid Point Value) to the Chilbolton Antenna.

I do know the exact location opposite the_Eltanin_Antenna .. which I've posted on The Internet. If that helps at all .. ? It's in Siberia ..

Notice its E.Giza Grid LONG .. 43 (deg) X 52 (min) X 35.23584633 (sec) E.Giza .. = 78787.3524 E.Giza. [ E.Greenwich 75 deg 00 min 36.03584633 sec ].

Do you believe this !!!????!!!! ... yet_another_decimal harmonic of the 787873.524 generic Volume of a Sphere !!!

Its Grid LAT North is identical, of course, to the Eltanin Antenna Grid LAT South .. 59 (deg) X 09 (min) X 17.98360939 (sec) North .. = 9549.296586 North.

Its Grid POINT Value in Siberia .. 78787.3524 / 9549.296586 = 8.25059225

That figure .. 8.25059225 .. is a decimal harmonic of .. the AKAPANA PYRAMID Grid LONG (Tiahuanaco, South America) of .. 82505.9225 W.Giza .. = 99 (deg) X 48 (min) X 17.36235743 (sec) W.Giza. [ W.Greenwich .. 68 deg 40 min 16.56235743 sec ].

That same_exact_longitude .. is, according to Munck's work .. the meridian (great circle) along-which the last Earth pole-shift manifested. In other words .. the_"net"_displacement of the north and south poles .. geometric poles .. in terms of latitude, according to the_new_and current equator .. !! .. happened_along_that meridian .. and was of "exactly" 30 degrees of latitude .. so that today's Akpatok Island .. in NE Canada .. is the_surface_location of the_former_geographic north pole. I.e. .. the entire Earth *turned* .. NOT a "crustal displacement".

Now .. I don't know if that sheds any immediate light on the subject at hand, but I thought I should detail that, nonetheless.

-- Michael L.M.

P.S. By the way .. the *Grid LAT* of The AKAPANA PYRAMID .. is .. identical_numerically_to the *Grid LAT* of THE FACE @ Cydonia on Mars .. 4523.893421 South .. = 16 (deg) X 33 (min) X 8.567979964 (sec) South.

THE FACE @ Cydonia on Mars is in the northern hemisphere.

_______________________________

99.38.10 Square forms (TomBuoyed) 

Subj: Square forms
Date: 08/26/2001
From: (TomBuoyed)
Email: TomBuoyed@aol.com

In a message dated 8/25/2001 1:08:21 PM, Peace2go writes:

Outside of the seemingly intentional copy of the man-made version of interstellar code in the "Aricibo" formation, I don't recall any other examples of rectilinear frames in the crop circle catalogue. Not being a student of crop circles, I could easily be wrong on this point and will study the archives looking for this feature.

I base the term "unnatural" on Buckminster Fuller's conclusion that nature is not operating in perpendicular and parallel directions but in radial growth patterns of convergence and divergence. Radial patterns have been the hallmark of crop circles so far.

Robert,

Consider the idea that circular forms are right brain-intuitive-holistic while linear forms are left-brain-analytical-abstract. I believe we are witnessing the beginning of an exhortation by the crop circle makers that we must now begin to reconcile in earnest our right and left hemispheres.

Up until these rectangular frames appeared, the glyphs were almost always framed in a circle. (There were rectangular bug and dolphin forms, but they were never FRAMED in a rectangle.) Furthermore, up until the face appeared, ALL previous crop glyph forms were ideographic representations of precise geometric forms --- combinations of perfect circles and lines. The face marks the first purely pictorial form of a complete object, i.e., a face. But it is framed in a rectangle.

So here are the crossed polarities: Previously the ideographic glyphs (left-brain) were framed in the complete whole of the circles (right brain). Now we have an actual representation of a human face (right-brain-wholeness) which is framed in a rectangle (right-brain linear ideographic form).

I think back to that wonderful book of Julian Jaynes of 30 years ago: "The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind." His thesis was that humans were originally whole-brained and that the separation into right and left brains was an evolutionary advance that created our present form of self-consciousness and separation from the gods of the whole brain which became vestigial deep in the right brain while the left brain pulled away from the right.

Now it appears that we are being called upon to develop a form of super-consciousness by reintegrating left and right brains so that we may develop a kind of depth perception of the spiritual realities around us --- just as the integration of left and right eyes provides the parallax necessary for us to have depth perception. Furthermore, this suggests a kind of spiritual "optic chiasma" where right and left pathways cross in the brain.

Tom

PS Also consider that a circle with an infinite radius is a square; while a square with infinitely long sides is a circle at infinity.

_______________________________

99.38.11 Square forms (MLM) 

Subj: Square forms
Date: 08/26/2001
From: (MLM)
Email: Milamo@aol.com

In a message dated 08/25/2001 12:08:21 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Peace2go writes:

As Tom has noticed, the frame for the Face is *not* rectilinear.

Not rectilinear ? Looks rectilinear to me. You are talking about the 'Crop-Face', right ? That's why I thought of the L X W ... and Hoagland mentioned "120 ft. by 70-something-or-near 80" feet, on Art Bell Friday night.

So .. I then found that 120 X 79.57747155 = 9549.296586 ... the Grid LAT of the Eltanin Antenna. 7.957747155 .. is the Orion Belt-star Composite Ratio, as of Jan.1, 2000, that I found in the "ASM". I thought I might have found something really quite significant, in all that correlation.

- - Michael L.M.

_______________________________

99.38.12 Square forms (CodeUFO) 

Subj: Square forms
Date: 08/26/2001
From: (CodeUFO)
Email: CodeUFO@aol.com

In a message dated 8/25/01 10:24:36 PM, TomBuoyed writes:

So here are the crossed polarities: Previously the ideographic glyphs (left-brain) were framed in the complete whole of the circles (right brain). Now we have an actual representation of a human face (right-brain-wholeness) which is framed in a rectangle (right-brain linear ideographic form).

Oh man! Yes, right on, Tom! An insightful observation!

I think back to that wonderful book of Julian Jaynes of 30 years ago: "The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind." His thesis was that humans were originally whole-brained and that the separation into right and left brains was an evolutionary advance that created our present form of self-consciousness and separation from the gods of the whole brain which became vestigial deep in the right brain while the left brain pulled away from the right.

Now it appears that we are being called upon to develop a form of super-consciousness by reintegrating left and right brains so that we may develop a kind of depth perception of the spiritual realities around us --- just as the integration of left and right eyes provides the parallax necessary for us to have depth perception.

Again, great! I'd forgotten about Jaynes' book. This is an excellent interpretation of what may be going on. Thanks for this! Really something to think about.

-Gary-

_______________________________

99.38.13 Square forms (TomBuoyed) 

Subj: Square forms
Date: 08/26/2001
From: (TomBuoyed)
Email: TomBuoyed@aol.com

Robert,

Go to

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2001/chilbolton2/chilbolton2001b.html

since Steve Alexander, for whatever reason, had Richard Hoagland pull many of Steve's photos from the Art Bell webpage.

The overhead close-up photo of the Face is distorted and gives the appearance that the lower chin part of the frame is squeezed inward. However, if you look at the long range oblique photograph which includes the radio telescope at the lower right, the Face and the Arecibo rectangle, then it is clear that the Face frame is perfectly rectilinear.

The key is that the tram lines are parallel in this long range photo, but they are not parallel in the overhead close-up of the face. There is a greater distance between the tram lines at the top of the frame than at the bottom. I don't know if it's a distortion of the photograph itself or of the scanner, but it's definitely a distortion.

I notice the main longitudinal axis of the Arecibo rectangle points toward the telescope dish, while the Face axis does not. The two lines intersect near the edge of the field and form an X with the telescope. I hope someone is calculating the bearings of these two lines. I think they might intersect other formations perhaps even miles away. Also, their angles with either true north and/or magnetic north might be significant.

Tom

_______________________________

99.38.14 Re: UK Crop Forms/Face/Eltanin-Antenna Correlations (Raphiem) 

Subj: Re: UK Crop Forms/Face/Eltanin-Antenna Correlations
Date: 08/26/2001
From: (Raphiem)
Email: Raphiem@onebox.com

To: MetPhys@aol.com, Milamo@aol.com, CodeUFO@aol.com, Peace2go@aol.com, Dee777@aol.com, JerryIuliano@aol.com, TomBuoyed@aol.com

"Raphiem" wrote: I found the antipode ... direct opposite side of the earth for the Chilbolton Antenna ... (using MLM's co-ords) ... the antipode is off the SE coast off New Zealand ....

see attached map to give you some graphics ....

MetPhys ... have you read stargate conspiracy (MetPhys: No).... i also have thought along what you say .... that by watching angle of antenna is it possible that it is some agency / humans using some technology not for the masses creating these crop circles .... and actually not some 6th dimensional ET's .... ??

later .. R. ------

MetPhys@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 8/26/1 3:23:24 AM, you wrote:

Chilbolton Radio Telescope

To all,

I deduced some years ago, from my observations of bifilar counterwound coils upon a core and bifilar wound toroidal fields around a center, that a scalar component seems to occupy the axis (core-center) as a focused beam of invisible energy. Only after years of keeping this in mind, did I connect this scalar with the antennas that I noticed were often pointing straight up in the air, like unto the Chilbolton Radio Telescope at the time of this latest "face glyph" and the "rectilinear code glyph".

After making these observations about scalar (1998) I began to wonder why observed antenna choose a seemingly perfect vertical alignment. Upon reading a book about the Montauk Point facility, I learned that the scalar component transmitted exactly opposite out the back of the dish-antenna in opposition to the EM component out the front of the dish-antenna with the focused beam scalar injuring several personnel unwary of how dangerous it was, walking in back of the antenna.

So the conclusion of this is to ask, based upon the assumption that the Chilbolton Radio Antenna has a scalar component emitting from the back of it, is this- "If it is transmitting scalar into the center of the earth or beyond, what point is beyond the earth center on the other side of the earth's surface?" I hope it is the Eltanin Antenna! Someone please let us know what is the exactly opposite GPV (Grid Point Value) to the Chilbolton Antenna.

If the antenna is reflecting off the center of the earth it implies an ability to use that scalar as it returns at or near the antenna, namely Great Britain. If the Chilbolton Antenna is declinated to any degree it may have the capability to transmit scalar to another location as it is reflected off the inner mantle or inner cores of the earth.

To check this hypotheses it would be necessary to monitor all known antenna for the declination angles at the time of notable crop formations to calculate angle of incidence and angle of reflection. If the connection can be made between antenna declination and the times of crop formations, we will know the cause of the formations.

MetPhys@aol.com

_______________________________

99.38.15 PsyOps ET Crop Analysis (CodeUFO) 

Subj: Re: PsyOps ET Crop Analysis
Date: 08/26/2001
From: (CodeUFO)
Email: CodeUFO@aol.com

In a message dated 8/24/01 10:30:20 AM, MetPhys writes:

27 yrs to return? Jerry does that number ring any bells? 27 level electrons?

Telepathy? I understand that scalar is a beam thru the axis of a counterwound coil...such as a tesla or a toroidal coil...it is instant...no time..no space...connect it to human / a.lien mind-energy-consciousness and bang!!!...instant communication...not 27 yrs....so.....it took 27 yrs to get there? How many parsecs is the speed of light x 27 yrs? What does the ET antenna remind us of? An antenna with a circle in the middle? A lens in the alien head? What does "A lens" and "A liens" really mean? Gary...some AlphaNumerics on this please?

Well, I held off on the alphanumerics request here because nothing was really coming up. Okay, I did find A LENS + ALIENS = 111, Greek gematria for "Nine", "Dwelling (or house)" and "Key". Also 111= TIME IS KEY and ONE HALF CIRCLE. It was interesting but I wanted more. So I waited. As so often happens, the alphanumerics takes its cues from something Michael comes up with and now I'm getting even more input from y'all. Just tonight something worth mentioning came about. It relates not only to the question from metphys about the mind-energy-consciousness idea but also to the recent discussion thread concerning right/left brain, circle, square, etc. and also to a possible mechanism by which the crop glyphs might be created. I want to share the numbers with you but in order for it to make any sense I have to give you the nano-compressed version of something I was involved in way back in 1967. I always feel a bit apprehensive about sharing this story because I get that "oh-come-on-give-me-a-break" grin with the rolling of the eyes. Oh well... here goes...

In 1967, my wife (at the time), my best friend, Tom, and I were experimenting with a Ouija board for a few weeks. It was working extremely well but all the stuff we were getting was your typical communication with the dearly departed. Way cool, but then suddenly one evening, everything changed. Without warning of any kind we began getting a series of 19 words, over and over again Some were in English and some were in an unknown language (Grekian?) and one was in Latin

(1)SPECTOR, (2)MIND, (3)YOU, (4)EARTH, (5)GREK5, (6)SPECTOR1, (7)GOD, (8)TIME, (9)LOVE, (10)PAX, (11)SPECTOR11, (12)XESTAO, (13)GOD9, (14)FIRSON, (15)LASON, (16)HABITON, (17)KNOWLEDGE, (18)BABION, (19)DIX

I can't go into the whole long story here but suffice to say we were suddenly getting Ouija board and automatic writing communications from intelligent beings, quite alive and well, living on a planet they called Grek-5; so named because it was the 5th planet from the sun in their solar system. Fantastically, the story they told us about the creation of their planet and of our own earth was very similar to the Marduk/Tiamat scenario published by Sitchin some 10 years later. At one point we asked how it was that they could be manipulating the board to spell out the words? The board immediately went to the number "2". It kept doing this instead of answering the question directly. Finally we remembered the list of 19 words and noticed the 2nd word was "Mind". We asked if that was the key to this transmission and the answer was affirmative. They used the number "2" nearly every time the concept of "mind" came up. Amazingly, again about 10 years later, J.J. Hurtak published his well known and controversial book, "The Book of Knowledge: The Keys of Enoch". However it wasn't until sometime around 1993 that I discovered this book and bought a copy. In the back of the book is a glossary. In the glossary (much to my amazement) is this entry:

"MIND-2: A second world of consciousness development, preceding the world of physical form. A second world of "advanced intelligence" as an Overself governor connecting the planetary mind-body complex with the functions of the Universal Mind. Mind-2 works considerably faster than Mind-1 and interconnects with numerous entities, within the greater universe."

Well, that blew my 2, I want to tell you!

Notice: "Interconnects with numerous entities, within the greater universe"? That's exactly what they said was their means of communicating with us. And now I'm wondering if this is the way the crop circles are formed.

These sessions went on for several nights but that's enough of the background for me to get to the alphanumerics which I just found tonight (or last night, as I see the sun is rising!). Sometimes what happens is that certain words or phrases or even topics will just sort of ring a little bell for me and I kind of get the feeling I need to do some crunching because there's something coming in. Sounds nuts, I know. Anyway, that little bell rang tonight when crop circle researcher, Paul Vigay (on Dreamland) was asked by Linda Moulton Howe what he thought the difference in the "solar system" code of the Arecibo glyph might mean. He said something like, "Well, it could mean that they live on the 5th planet from the sun in their solar system". Considering what I just told you about Grek-5, you'll understand why the bell rang. Then, just about an hour or so later I read Tom's observations about right brain, left brain, circle, square, and the notion of the need to blend the one with the other, etc, etc, ... this all turned the bell into a damned chinese gong! Yikes, somebody get me an aspirin! LOL! So I began crunching. It didn't take long. The clues had been laid right out for me.

RIGHT BRAIN = 106
CIRCLE = 50
LEFT BRAIN = 87
SQUARE = 81
Sum: 324

I recognized this 324 as being the same digits, rearranged, as 432, an important gematrian number found throughout ancient lore from various cultures. Hmm.. what if I added the 324 to 432? 324 + 432 = 756, base length of the Great Pyramid measured in feet. Okay, that was cool but it really just seemed like a warm up.

I remembered Tom's comments about bringing the two sides of the brain into a convergence, so to speak. I thought, "United Brain".

UNITED BRAIN = 117 = FLESH AND BLOOD = NEGATIVE + DARK Interestingly, if you rearrange the 117 to 171 you get POSITIVE + LIGHT. 117 + 171 = 288 = 144x2, double light.

Okay, but where was this going? Then I thought, again, about Paul Vigay's idea about the 5th planet from the sun in their system, which reminded me of the "Mind-2" thing. After a little crunching nothing seemed to appear. Suddenly I thought, oh! What if that 2 was one of those little 2s as in "squared"? Mind squared? Hmm...

MIND SQUARED = 99 = THOUGHT

Okay, now it was beginning to get interesting. Then I thought (no pun intended) about actually squaring the word itself and that's when the really cool stuff began to come out:

MIND = 40
40 squared is 1600

But 1600 was an unusual number for me to work with. It had never come up before. So I went back to the right/left brain thing and looked at the 324. By this time "2" was on my mind so I decided to divide 324 by 2:

324/2 = 162

Ah! A decimal harmonic of Bruce Cathie's 162,000 max. light-speed in nautical miles per second. As Michael once explained, By "max. light-speed", we mean the speed of light in "open space" .. before it is 'slowed-down' incrementally by any given celestial body's atmosphere and magnetic field.

Alright! Now we're getting somewhere! Back to the 1600: 1600 ("MIND" squared) / 162 = 9.87654321

Wow, I thought. Cool number! The whole series backwards! What does it do when it's added to the same series forward, I wondered? 987654321 + 123456789 = 1111111110 Whoa! Binary code? I didn't know and I really don't know beans about binary code but I know it's 1s and 0s. Right? I think so. Someone straighten me out if I'm wrong.

I knew the sum of that series (1 thru 9) is 45. Since "reversals" seem to yield interesting results in the alphanumeric world I tried it here: 54 + 45 = 99 = MIND SQUARED = THOUGHT !!!

Okay, great! How about the alphanumeric value of the "alphanumber"

FORTY FIVE?
FORTY FIVE = 126 = SPEED OF LIGHT

Oh yes, I'm havin fun now. The 126 reminds me of the 162. Now I already know that the alphaforms of these digits is 144, classic gematria for the concept of "light":

ONE + TWO + SIX = 144

What do I get if I put the numeral forms together?

126 + 162 = 288 = 144x2, or double light.

So what does all this tell us? Maybe it's all just coincidence. Or maybe... just maybe... it's saying the crop glyphs are created by the transference of thought patterns at the speed of light? And how about that mysterious Eltanin antenna? What the hell is that thing? Michael Morton, in one of his recent posts, has correlated that item with the ASM numbers involved with these latest crop glyphs. Remember Raphiem's discovery of the Eltanin antenna 144 mile radius phenomenon? And is it just coincidence that ELTANIN ANTENNA = 144? And I can't resist ending this with a note about the question regarding the 27 years:

CODE = 27

In all my alphanumerics work over the past few years, the number 27 has only come up twice, not counting that it's encoded into the very structure of the English alphabet. But in terms of it turning up as the alphanumeric value of a case related word or phrase it's only come up twice. The other one is this:

HALF = 27

And speaking of 144, look at half of 144:

144/2 = 72, the reverse of CODE.

Do the ol' reverse and combine trick:

72 + 27 = 99 = MIND SQUARED = THOUGHT

Interestingly, the same thing happens with all of the double digit numbers which can be reduced to 9, such as 72 and 27 (7+2=9):

27+72 = 99
36+63 = 99

45+54 = 99
81+18 = 99

But then I'm not surprised because, as I've noted before: NINE IS THE KEY = 144

-Gary-

_______________________________

99.38.16 PsyOps ET Crop Analysis (MetPhys) 

Subj: PsyOps ET Crop Analysis
Date: 08/24/2001
From: (MetPhys)
Email: MetPhys@aol.com

PsyOpsNews.com Psychological Operations News

Questions to all:

27 yrs to return? Jerry does that number ring any bells? 27 level electrons?

Telepathy? I understand that scalar is a beam thru the axis of a counterwound coil...such as a tesla or a toroidal coil...it is instant...no time..no space...connect it to human / a.lien mind-energy-consciousness and bang!!!...instant communication...not 27 yrs....so.....it took 27 yrs to get there? How many parsecs is the speed of light x 27 yrs? What does the ET antenna remind us of? An antenna with a circle in the middle? A lens in the alien head? What does "A lens" and "A liens" really mean? Gary...some AlphaNumerics on this please?

Humans generating their own reflections? Perhaps Gaia Earth Mind is becoming so aware, she's talking back to us, now that we are so close to 2003 or 2012?

And the depressing question: Do the powers that be, have a microwave technology that transmits a filtered, coded beam of radiation into wheat to play games with us? When were microwave technologies begun? Did it take 27 yrs to develop a suitable response from the satellites?

MetPhys@aol.com

_______________________________

99.38.17 PsyOps ET Crop Analysis (MetPhys) 

Subj: Re: PsyOps ET Crop Analysis
Date: 08/24/2001
From: (MetPhys)
Email: MetPhys@aol.com

To all,

This is a response to Gary's mail (CodeUFO, 8/26/01). You all are welcome to participate.

A LENS + ALIENS = 111...The only 111 that I know of is the 111 Miller Indice of Crystallography naming the 8 sided Giza pyramidal octahedron sides as the only crystal that is perfectly transmitting / receiving. Therefore I concluded there is a Transmitter of this same shape, probably encompassing the whole of universe, Is this the "Dwelling" or "House" transmitting thru the "Giza Pyramid Lens"?

MIND-2 reminds me of the pilot wave of science that leads the group wave we can measure and know of. The pilot wave arrives before it leaves. I have more but I'll stop.

987654321 + 123456789 = 1111111110...Leahy relates the Ultimate God (my interpretation) to a backward number string (987654321) plus a negative exponent. Interesting~ Actually I suspect Gods number string is "forward" and its opposite (123456789) is "backward".

"maybe... it's saying the crop glyphs are created by the transference of thought patterns at the speed of light?" Perhaps it's the "faster-than-light" pilot wave (mind^2).

Gary- If you are converting alpha.bets to numerical strings, you can also convert number strings such as infinite pi numbers into embedded words? Reverse Engineering AlphaNumerics. I'll leave this to you.

MetPhys@aol.com
Impossible Correspondence http://hometown.aol.com/MetPhys/metaphysicshome.html

_______________________________

99.38.18 Re: Square forms (Raphiem) 

Subj: Re: Square forms
Date: 08/26/2001
From: (Raphiem)
Email: Raphiem@onebox.com

In a message dated 8/26/01 8:27:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time, TomBuoyed writes:

The overhead close-up photo of the Face is distorted and gives the appearance that the lower chin part of the frame is squeezed inward. However, if you look at the long range oblique photograph which includes the radio telescope at the lower right, the Face and the Arecibo rectangle, then it is clear that the Face frame is perfectly rectilinear.

The key is that the tram lines are parallel in this long range photo, but they are not parallel in the overhead close-up of the face. There is a greater distance between the tram lines at the top of the frame than at the bottom. I don't know if it's a distortion of the photograph itself or of the scanner, but it's definitely a distortion.

I notice the main longitudinal axis of the Arecibo rectangle points toward the telescope dish, while the Face axis does not. The two lines intersect near the edge of the field and form an X with the telescope. I hope someone is calculating the bearings of these two lines. I think they might intersect other formations perhaps even miles away. Also, their angles with either true north and/or magnetic north might be significant.

Thanks, Tom. Actually I went to the CCC site *after* I posted, that's when I noticed the other photos and I agree with you -- the Face photo has a rectilinear frame. I jumped to a conclusion based on the distorted aerial shot which gives the impression of being rhomboid.

Without seeing the other ground shots, I was very skeptical of the Face image due to a couple of factors. Besides the 'square frame,' the photo appears to have been processed for reverse contrast. Both of these factors combined with the explicit subject matter caused me to turn up the skepticism. So actually, the distorted frame was supportive evidence to me that the Face was genuine because it seemed to follow the pattern of radial geometry.

Seeing the other ground photos, and noting the striking rectangles formed by both images, I have to say that this is a new "species" of image. Also, as did Tom, I noticed that the "Arecibo" glyph appears to be directly aligned with the radio telescope, while the Face is not.

In another attempt to determine if the Face was rectilinear I counted the nodes of the cross-hatches and it appears that there is an equal number on opposites sides which strongly implies that it is intended to be rectilinear.

Since the "Arecibo" glyph is a direct copy of "our" transmission and points directly at a radio telescope, with square digital pixels even, it directly contrasts our style of high science with what has been transpiring within crop circles over the years.

The 'squareness' combined with the explicit content and positioning, plus a photo!, is certainly 'out of context' for the otherwise enigmatic history of crop circles. Whether this represents another enigma, a new stage, another species of contact, an elaborate hoax, or an explicit clue, it certainly fits into the total ecology of the mystery we are chasing.

The binary logic (Boolean) of digital computers was state of the art when we began broadcasting a few decades ago. Since then our technology has transformed and ... so has the logic.

But that's another topic.

Regards, Robert

Page 38

Sections List- 99 Electrons and Mythologies
Impossible Correspondence Index

© Copyright. Robert Grace. 2001