**99.69.1 Addenda to: 99.68.4 More on Newton's Prism Gaps (CodeUFO)**

From: CodeUFO

To: MetPhys@aol.com, luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

Subject: Addenda to: 99.68.4 More on Newton's Prism Gaps (CodeUFO)

Date: 09/25/02

In a message dated 9/26/02 3:09:38 AM, MetPhys writes:

99.68.4 Electrons and Mythologies

On this page at:

99.68.4 More on Newton's Prism Gaps (Luigi)

From: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

To: MetPhys@aol.com

Subject: More on Newton's Prism Gaps (Luigi)

Date: 09/15/02

Luigi Writes about "gaps":

<< Hi Robert

Got another quote for you:

Source: ( section 67.30 Harmonics ).

<< This "Gap" spans musical notes e flat to f flat in Helmholtz complete Determination of Tone Table. It represents the gaps in Newtons prism light experiments wherein the gaps between the prism colors were found to be in Dorian scale ratio, raised to the 2/3 power. MetPhys >>

[....snip....]

So we could make up two lists. One would represent the gaps according to the previous gap, and the other would simply add the 2/3 to every note of the Dorian mode.

All these numbers have a hidden 27 connotation as well.

1 + 8 + 7 + 4 + 2 + 5 = 27

4 + 4 + 3 + 5 + 5 + 6 = 27

7 + 4 + 9 + 2 +5 = 27 >>

Upon reading this I recognized that first set of numbers, 187425. These are the same numbers in the "gap" spacing found in the breakdown of the AlphaNumber Table. The following will explain (this is an excerpt from a previous article):

________EXCERPT:

But as I thought about this it seemed as if we were continuing that process and discovering new elements, new pieces to the puzzle. And, thinking of the Kabalah, it occurred to me maybe the traditional Tree Of Life has been waiting for a companion. I knew the traditional Kabalists would string me up for sure, but what was I to do? The image shown here [see attached], came to me in a single flash of inspiration and I couldn't ignore it. I was going to call it the Tree Of Transition but the words, THE CODE TREE popped into my head and I liked it. Besides, the alphanumeric value of THE CODE TREE equals 108, a good gematrian number (THE SPIRAL=108, GEOMETRY=108 and, if you saw the previous installment of the CodeZone you'll recall how significant the number 108 is to the goddess pentagram at Rennes Le Chateau). The Code Tree, it turns out, encompasses one whole heck of a lot of really curious "coincidences" relating to this whole notion of an encoded reality. It's too much to go into here but the following is a very brief explanation of some of its elements.

The Code Tree is based on the number 9 which is so prevalent in what I call cryptonumerology. The path by which the numbers flow from bottom to top just happened to create a central "trunk" comprised of the numbers 3, 6, and 9. This seemed very synchronistic since one of the email correspondences mentioned above was about a recent discovery by a researcher named Marko Rodin (Marco Rodin's Toroid Sunflower Map (doubling+3, 9, 6, etc. gap sequence http://shaka.com/~kalepa/dblcirct.gif). It has to do with the method of "cross-adding" multidigit numbers, such as 34 for example, to reduce them to a single digit. In the case of our example we see 34 reduces to 7 by adding the 3 to the 4. Rodin showed that a repeating pattern of numbers is derived by the method in the cross addition of the powers of two (1, 2, 4, 8, etc.). The repeating pattern is:

1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5 (If you didn't follow this, each number in this series is twice the number just before it. The 7 comes from 8+8=16, then cross-adding 1+6=7. The 5 comes from 7+7=14, then 1+4=5)

Notice the numbers 3, 6, and 9 are missing. The missing numbers are thought to be a "gap space" pattern, related to the torus spiral, the shape of which, I'm told, is governed by the Fibonacci sequence. It also happens that in my discovery of the patterns within our alphabet, these patterns produce the exact same series, 1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5, except they are in "alpha-form" (ONE, TWO, FOUR, EIGHT, SEVEN, FIVE) and with the exact same 3-6-9 gap spacing. That is to say, the words THREE, SIX, and NINE are missing. Can this possibly be mere coincidence? The odds would seem astronomical.

(Note: 1+2+4+8+7+5 = 27 = CODE)

Now, regarding the rest of the Tree, the numbers outside the circles are the reduced sums of the alphaforms of the number inside the circle. For example, ONE=34=7.

Here's something else of interest: In the series of what I call "alpha-numbers" (i.e., the word forms or "alphaforms" of the numerical digits), "ONE" thru "NINE" there are only three of the alpha-numbers which reduce to 6: FOUR(60), FIVE(42), and NINE(42). Here is the entire series with the reduced value in parentheses:

ONE=34 (7)

TWO=58 (4)

THREE=56 (2)

FOUR=60 (6)

FIVE=42 (6)

SIX=52 (7)

SEVEN=65 (2)

EIGHT=49 (4)

NINE=42 (6)

So, in the entire series, these three give us the infamous 666. Interestingly, the multi-digit values (60, 42, and 42) total up to 144, classic gematria for "light". 144 also happens to be the alphanumeric value of the phrase, THE GOD OF ISRAEL, using the straight serial alphanumeric code of the English alphabet (A=1 through Z=26). As you can see, the 459 presents itself as a triangle on the Code Tree (It's interesting, from a synchronicity standpoint, to keep in mind that I didn't "plan" any of this. It just "happened".) The numbers 4, 5, and 9 have some other correlations when their order is changed to 549. Check out the alphanumeric value (ANV) of this phrase:

SIX SIX SIX IS THE VIBRATIONAL FREQUENCY OF LUCIFER = 549

And, interestingly enough:

SIX SIX SIX IS THE VIBRATIONAL FREQUENCY OF JESUS = 549

Also, as shown on my web site the "word forms" of the numbers 1 thru 9 (i.e., ONE thru NINE) fall into three groups according to the number of letters in each word in the Group:

Group-1 (3-letters): ONE-TWO-SIX

Group-2 (4-letters): FOUR-FIVE-NINE

Group-3 (5-letters): THREE-SEVEN-EIGHT

I noticed the 666 was encoded in Group-2 as FOUR-FIVE-NINE (see above for explanation). And, as noted above, FOUR(60) + FIVE(42) + NINE(42) = 144 = THE GOD OF ISRAEL.

So I thought if the antichrist (or negative attribute) is represented in this 1-through-9 number series, then it would seem likely that the opposite, or the "positive attribute" would be represented also. But, unlike the negative attribute in which we are given the number to look for as an identifier (i.e., 666), we don't necessarily have a specific number to look for as an identifier for the positive attribute. So what was I to do? Well, I thought, there are only three groups in the series so let's see what we find. I decided to try Group-1 first just because its the 3-letter group and 3 can be interpreted as representing the three-in-one God concept. Seemed like a likely shot. Interestingly, Group-1 produces the same value as Group-2. Here's what we find:

Group-1:

ONE(34) + TWO(58) + SIX(52) = 144

the same result as Group-2:

FOUR(60) + FIVE(42) + NINE(42) = 144

So, Group-1 and Group-2 might be seen as representing the two sides (or the dual nature) of the one God, Jehovah, or some related archetypal idea. Interestingly, the ANV (AlphaNumeric Value) of JEHOVAH is 69, the Yin/Yang sign symbolizing the concept of opposites-in-one or "dual nature".

_____End EXCERPT:

I just noticed something regarding that last part, above. Speculating along the same lines, we could interpret the two sets as representing the dual God/Goddess idea, both with equal value of 144. If we think of the God/Goddess merging to create a third part, we could could call it the Child: God/Goddess/Child. So we'd have 288/3 = 96, the mirror of 69.

GOD + GODDESS + CHILD = 135

Reversing the 135:

351 + 135 = 666

GOD + GODDESS = 99 = THE GOD MIND = THOUGHT

Thought manifests into the physical as the God/Goddess merge to produce the Child.

Now, going back to the missing numbers 3, 6 and 9 in the gap patterns, and bringing this all back into the music discussion, I'll paste here part of a previous email that I'd sent to MetPhys and Luigi several weeks ago:

<< FREQUENCY = 114

114 x 1 = 114 = 6

114 x 2 = 228 = 3

114 x 3 = 342 = 9

114 x 4 = 456 = 6

114 x 5 = 570 = 3

114 x 6 = 684 = 9

114 x 7 = 798 = 6

114 x 8 = 912 = 3

114 x 9 =1026 = 9

Note the reduced value sets (6,3,9) above. Here's how this produces the 504 for the Magic Square Of Tone:

HARMONIC TONE = 135 = GOD+GODDESS+CHILD

A harmonic chord is comprised of the 1st, 3rd, and 5th (1,3,5)

639 - 135 = 504

Now with 639 in mind, check out this amazing letter/number synch:

SIXTH TRIAD = 132 = 6

THIRD TRIAD = 111 = 3

NINTH TRIAD = 117 = 9

And if that isn't cool enough, there's this:

132+111+117 = 360

While looking for something on the net ... I happened to run into the following. Notice the number 639 is discussed in the same context. Interesting that the alphanumeric value of FREQUENCY in the above multiplication table would produce this number as a series of reduced values.

100 Electrons and Musical Scales

<< The E flat note at 639 Hz is close to the frequency of the kung note in the Chinese system of music. According to David Tame, "this foundation note was considered to be the earthly manifestation of divine will, and a sacred, eternal principle, upon which was based the proportional system (the weight, size and tone of all things) of the entire state." (69) If the kung was wrong, civilization would decline. Unfortunately, the ruler of each dynasty changed the value for the kung because they reasoned that if the previous dynasty had been right, it wouldn't have ended. The last Chinese dynasty put the kung at 601.5 Hz, a D. They were wrong.

The central role of the E flat note was pointed out by Barbara Hero in her collection of musings and sketches on the mystical aspects of music, Eyes + Ears = Ideas. She found that it was at the beginning, end, or other key locations in 18 different musical, mathematical or metaphysical patterns. She wrote, "It's the place at which we find the beginning of life, and the fastest musical pulse of the thirty second note... It becomes the boundary of the end of the time where space begins... it is at the limit of the macrocosmos."(70)

To fully explain the significance of what Barbara Hero wrote above is beyond the scope of this newsletter. If you are intrigued, I would recommend that you get the book. It is available to read on-line at , but unfortunately the illustrations are illegible. Suffice it to say that the E flat note at 639 Hz corresponds to the kung note and to "Aum," the cosmic tone of Brahma, the creator. I am not saying that 639 Hz is the actual frequency of the tone of creation. It is the octave of that tone which the human voice can recite comfortably. >>

And I found something else:

SIX THREE NINE = 150

150 x 1 = 150 = 6

150 x 2 = 300 = 3

150 x 3 = 450 = 9

150 x 4 = 600 = 6

150 x 5 = 750 = 3

150 x 6 = 900 = 9

150 x 7 = 1050 = 6

150 x 8 = 1200 = 3

150 x 9 = 1350 = 9

Also:

6x3x9 = 162 = THE THREE TONES

162 is the note, E, on Jimi Furia's Gematrian Music Wheel.

162 / 3 = 54 = TONE

FIFTY FOUR = 126

126 + 162 = 288, double light.

**99.69.2 Addenda to: 99.68.4 More on Newton's Prism Gaps (Luigi)**

From: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

To: MetPhys@aol.com, CodeUFO@aol.com

Subject: Addenda to: 99.68.4 More on Newton's Prism Gaps (Luigi)

Date: 09/25/02

Wow Gary, things are really coming together. If someone would care to tell me where exactly they are leading too I would love to be reminded! Until then hope you don't mind me adding everything I can think of at this moment. There is a lot of correlation between our work I believe, but coming from quite different angles at times. As I was reading I was getting quite pity we can't simply dump what we are trying to convey from one brain into another instead of having to devise words into an e-mail.

<< All these numbers have a hidden 27 connotation as well.

1 + 8 + 7 + 4 + 2 + 5 = 27

4 + 4 + 3 + 5 + 5 + 6 = 27

7 + 4 + 9 + 2 +5 = 27 >>

Upon reading this I recognized that first set of numbers, 187425.

These are the same numbers in the "gap" spacing found in the breakdown of the AlphaNumber Table. The following will explain (this is an excerpt from a previous article):

________EXCERPT:

But as I thought about this it seemed as if we were continuing that process and discovering new elements, new pieces to the puzzle. And, thinking of the Kabalah, it occurred to me maybe the traditional Tree Of Life has been waiting for a companion. I knew the traditional Kabalists would string me up for sure, but what was I to do? The image shown here [see attached], came to me in a single flash of inspiration and I couldn't ignore it. I was going to call it the Tree Of Transition but the words, THE CODE TREE popped into my head and I liked it. Besides, the alphanumeric value of THE CODE TREE equals 108, a good gematrian number (THE SPIRAL=108, GEOMETRY=108 and, if you saw the previous installment of the CodeZone you'll recall how significant the number 108 is to the goddess pentagram at Rennes Le Chateau). The Code Tree, it turns out, encompasses one whole heck of a lot of really curious "coincidences" relating to this whole notion of an encoded reality. It's too much to go into here but the following is a very brief explanation of some of its elements.

The Code Tree is based on the number 9 which is so prevalent in what I call cryptonumerology. The path by which the numbers flow from bottom to top just happened to create a central "trunk" comprised of the numbers 3, 6, and 9. This seemed very synchronistic since one of the email correspondences mentioned above was about a recent discovery by a researcher named Marko Rodin (Marco Rodin's Toroid Sunflower Map (doubling+3, 9, 6, etc. gap sequence http://shaka.com/~kalepa/dblcirct.gif). It has to do with the method of "cross-adding" multidigit numbers, such as 34 for example, to reduce them to a single digit. In the case of our example we see 34 reduces to 7 by adding the 3 to the 4. Rodin showed that a repeating pattern of numbers is derived by the method in the cross addition of the powers of two (1, 2, 4, 8, etc.). The repeating pattern is:

1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5 (If you didn't follow this, each number in this series is twice the number just before it. The 7 comes from 8+8=16, then cross-adding 1+6=7. The 5 comes from 7+7=14, then 1+4=5)

Notice the numbers 3, 6, and 9 are missing. The missing numbers are thought to be a "gap space" pattern, related to the torus spiral, the shape of which, I'm told, is governed by the Fibonacci sequence. It also happens that in my discovery of the patterns within our alphabet http://members.aol.com/codeufo/gematria.html, these patterns produce the exact same series, 1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5, except they are in "alpha-form" (ONE, TWO, FOUR, EIGHT, SEVEN, FIVE) and with the exact same 3-6-9 gap spacing. That is to say, the words THREE, SIX, and NINE are missing. Can this possibly be mere coincidence? The odds would seem astronomical.

<< (Note: 1+2+4+8+7+5 = 27 = CODE) >>

There are a few other strange places this 124875 , 36 and 9 are found. These are the only three number sequences that appear when any number is continually doubled or halved.

I have a very strong suspicion that there is an actual shape that is more important to digest than the various ways one can get to it. That shape is the diamond like shape. I first found it when I took the 3 6 9 out of the vedic square, leaving only the numbers 1 2 4 8 7 5 ( section 99.58.2 ). This was after the doubling and halving experiment (which, if you can stand it, is at ( section 99.58.3 ).

This diamond like shape is also a 666 and a reverse 666 if one look at it from the point of view of the whole mode box ( section 99.58.17 ). Each triangle is three minor 6th leaps. These triangles are standing back to back. Perhaps it is the first 144 Pi numbers plus the mirror Pi numbers simultaneously, which both add up to 666.

Is the missing 18 between 126 and 144 really three leaps of a 6th either side of the axis which create the shape?

This 1 2 4 8 7 5 is also found by dividing by 7, although the numbers are never in that particular order but still function in a same way at a deeper level.

1/7 = .142857

2/7 = .285714

3/7 = .428571 etc

Any number divided by 7 produces this same sequence starting at different points. Even though the 1 2 4 8 7 5 never happens in that order when dividing by 7 it still shows two things, musical inversions and number sequence partners (from the Vedic square). For example, the 1 links with the 8, which is three places on, the 2 links with 7 and the 4 links with 5. These partners are musical inversions, where the 1 and 8 are octaves, the 2nd is the inversion of a 7th and the 4th is an inversion of the 5th. In the number sequences the 1 and 8 are mirror flow partners. The 1 sequence, for example, flows 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 , and the 8 sequence mirrors that flow 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9. Likewise the 2 sequence, 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 9 mirrors the 7 sequence, 7 5 3 1 8 6 4 2 9. And so on. These relationships are also moving in thirds. They also swap over, firstly 1 8 and then 8 1 , for example.

<< Now, regarding the rest of the Tree, the numbers outside the circles are the reduced sums of the alphaforms of the number inside the circle. For example, ONE=34=7.

Here's something else of interest: In the series of what I call "alpha-numbers" (i.e., the word forms or "alphaforms" of the numerical digits), "ONE" thru "NINE" there are only three of the alpha-numbers which reduce to 6: FOUR(60), FIVE(42), and NINE(42). Here is the entire series with the reduced value in parentheses:

ONE=34 (7)

TWO=58 (4)

THREE=56 (2)

FOUR=60 (6)

FIVE=42 (6)

SIX=52 (7)

SEVEN=65 (2)

EIGHT=49 (4)

NINE=42 (6)

So, in the entire series, these three give us the infamous 666. Interestingly, the multi-digit values (60, 42, and 42) total up to 144, classic gematria for "light". 144 also happens to be the alphanumeric value of the phrase, THE GOD OF ISRAEL, using the straight serial alphanumeric code of the English alphabet (A=1 through Z=26). As you can see, the 459 presents itself as a triangle on the Code Tree (It's interesting, from a synchronicity standpoint, to keep in mind that I didn't "plan" any of this. It just "happened".) The numbers 4, 5, and 9 have some other correlations when their order is changed to 549. Check out the alphanumeric value (ANV) of this phrase:

SIX SIX SIX IS THE VIBRATIONAL FREQUENCY OF LUCIFER = 549

And, interestingly enough:

SIX SIX SIX IS THE VIBRATIONAL FREQUENCY OF JESUS = 549

This is also how a sacred gematria book I have called the Apostolic Gnosis sees these two principles. It is at the 666 where Light and Dark meet, one being called the sower of Tares and the other the savior Christ.

The chart at ( section 99.57.10 ) shows the point of musical light and dark meeting at the centre of the Dorian mode. This would centre over the note G#, which would be the note D's tri-tone partner and therefore axis partner too. The Dorians too form a triangle of frequencies through mirroring of formulas and these are also three minor 6th leaps.

<< Also, as shown on my web site http://members.aol.com/codeufo/gematria.html the "word forms" of the numbers 1 thru 9 (i.e., ONE thru NINE) fall into three groups according to the number of letters in each word in the Group:

Group-1 (3-letters): ONE-TWO-SIX

Group-2 (4-letters): FOUR-FIVE-NINE

Group-3 (5-letters): THREE-SEVEN-EIGHT

I noticed the 666 was encoded in Group-2 as FOUR-FIVE-NINE (see above for explanation). And, as noted above, FOUR(60) + FIVE(42) + NINE(42) = 144 = THE GOD OF ISRAEL.

So I thought if the antichrist (or negative attribute) is represented in this 1-through-9 number series, then it would seem likely that the opposite, or the "positive attribute" would be represented also. But, unlike the negative attribute in which we are given the number to look for as an identifier (i.e., 666), we don't necessarily have a specific number to look for as an identifier for the positive attribute. So what was I to do? Well, I thought, there are only three groups in the series so let's see what we find. I decided to try Group-1 first just because its the 3-letter group and 3 can be interpreted as representing the three-in-one God concept. Seemed like a likely shot. Interestingly, Group-1 produces the same value as Group-2. Here's what we find:

Group-1:

ONE(34) + TWO(58) + SIX(52) = 144

the same result as Group-2:

FOUR(60) + FIVE(42) + NINE(42) = 144

So, Group-1 and Group-2 might be seen as representing the two sides (or the dual nature) of the one God, Jehovah, or some related archetypal idea. Interestingly, the ANV (AlphaNumeric Value) of JEHOVAH is 69, the Yin/Yang sign symbolizing the concept of opposites-in-one or "dual nature".

_____End EXCERPT:

I just noticed something regarding that last part, above. Speculating along the same lines, we could interpret the two sets as representing the dual God/Goddess idea, both with equal value of 144. If we think of the God/Goddess merging to create a third part, we could could call it the Child:

God/Goddess/Child. So we'd have

288/3 = 96, the mirror of 69.

GOD + GODDESS + CHILD = 135

Reversing the 135:

351 + 135 = 666 >>

I do that a lot!! It's a cross between crossed eyedness after too much eye crossing maneuvers, and thinking too far ahead!

If you agree with the mirror number idea in the chart at ( section 99.57.12 ) it is interesting to note that 144 mirrored is 135! The mirror 144 equates to 153 outside the mirror. Both add up to 288 (135 + 153 = 288). Also the mirror of 153 is 162.

144 + 135 + 153 + 162 = 594

<< GOD + GODDESS = 99 = THE GOD MIND = THOUGHT

Thought manifests into the physical as the God/Goddess merge to produce the Child.

Now, going back to the missing numbers 3, 6 and 9 in the gap patterns, and bringing this all back into the music discussion, I'll paste here part of a previous email that I'd sent to MetPhys and Luigi several weeks ago:

<< FREQUENCY = 114

114 x 1 = 114 = 6

114 x 2 = 228 = 3

114 x 3 = 342 = 9

114 x 4 = 456 = 6

114 x 5 = 570 = 3

114 x 6 = 684 = 9

114 x 7 = 798 = 6

114 x 8 = 912 = 3

114 x 9 =1026 = 9

Note the reduced value sets (6,3,9) above. Here's how this produces the 504 for the Magic Square Of Tone:

HARMONIC TONE = 135 = GOD+GODDESS+CHILD

A harmonic chord is comprised of the 1st, 3rd, and 5th (1,3,5) 639 - 135 = 504

Now with 639 in mind, check out this amazing letter/number synch:

SIXTH TRIAD = 132 = 6

THIRD TRIAD = 111 = 3

NINTH TRIAD = 117 = 9

And if that isn't cool enough, there's this:

132+111+117 = 360 >>

These are the mirror number equivalents:

129 + 108 + 114 = 351

351 + 360 = 711 = reverse of 117

<< While looking for something on the net ... I happened to run into the following. Notice the number 639 is discussed in the same context. Interesting that the alphanumeric value of FREQUENCY in the above multiplication table would produce this number as a series of reduced values.

100 Electrons and Musical Scales

<< The E flat note at 639 Hz is close to the frequency of the kung note in the Chinese system of music. According to David Tame, "this foundation note was considered to be the earthly manifestation of divine will, and a sacred, eternal principle, upon which was based the proportional system (the weight, size and tone of all things) of the entire state." (69) If the kung was wrong, civilization would decline. Unfortunately, the ruler of each dynasty changed the value for the kung because they reasoned that if the previous dynasty had been right, it wouldn't have ended. The last Chinese dynasty put the kung at 601.5 Hz, a D. They were wrong.

The central role of the E flat note was pointed out by Barbara Hero in her collection of musings and sketches on the mystical aspects of music, Eyes + Ears = Ideas. She found that it was at the beginning, end, or other key locations in 18 different musical, mathematical or metaphysical patterns. She wrote, "It's the place at which we find the beginning of life, and the fastest musical pulse of the thirty second note... It becomes the boundary of the end of the time where space begins... it is at the limit of the macrocosmos."(70)

To fully explain the significance of what Barbara Hero wrote above is beyond the scope of this newsletter. If you are intrigued, I would recommend that you get the book. It is available to read on-line at , but unfortunately the illustrations are illegible. Suffice it to say that the E flat note at 639 Hz corresponds to the kung note and to "Aum," the cosmic tone of Brahma, the creator. I am not saying that 639 Hz is the actual frequency of the tone of creation. It is the octave of that tone which the human voice can recite comfortably. >>

And I found something else:

SIX THREE NINE = 150

150 x 1 = 150 = 6

150 x 2 = 300 = 3

150 x 3 = 450 = 9

150 x 4 = 600 = 6

150 x 5 = 750 = 3

150 x 6 = 900 = 9

150 x 7 = 1050 = 6

150 x 8 = 1200 = 3

150 x 9 = 1350 = 9

Mirror of 150 = 147

147 x 1 = 147 = 3

147 x 2 = 294 = 6

147 x 3 = 441 = 9 etc

<< Also:

6x3x9 = 162 = THE THREE TONES

162 is the note, E, on Jimi Furia's Gematrian Music Wheel.

162 / 3 = 54 = TONE

FIFTY FOUR = 126

126 + 162 = 288, double light. >>

This is how it should be, orderly symmetrical awe-inspiring and consistent on all fronts. There is something on Eb and the gemetria book I have which I would like to share so I will get on with it. The number 77 is knocking on my brain cell a lot recently:

CHRIST = 77

POWER= 77

GLORY=77

45:32 =77!

Yes, the last example is a ratio for the Tri-tone.

77 + ONE = 111 = my absolute all time fav!

The 111 can also be seen as 11:1 and 1:11, both being the harmonics F# sitting either side of the C fundamental. On the left it is division and boooo and hisss and 'intervalis diablos' and all that crap! On the right it is multiplication and hooray and let's wait for his return. Sorry , don't mean to joke about Christ. I believe the return is an inward thing.

Lui

**99.69.3 Where Are We Heading? (MetPhys)**

From: MetPhys@aol.com

To: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

Subject: Where Are We Heading? (MetPhys)

Date: 09/27/02

<< If someone would care to tell me where exactly they are leading too I would love to be reminded! Until then hope you don't mind me adding everything I can think of at this moment. >>

We are spiraling up one expanding spiral and down the other contracting spiral at the moment, just going round and round like a recursive Mode Box and where we stop I don't know. I had a big plan to arrive at a certain goal like connecting Universal Phi with pi, pi with "e", "e" with the Mode Box, Mode Box with fibonacci, fibonacci with I-ching, I-ching with biology, biology with consciousness, consciousness with Universal Phi, hoping that the last could then be connected with the first in a giant spiral but somewhere the last part got lost for now.

I was tryin to let several subjects flow on their own until I finished the work of posting it all, in order, then I was going to ask a few pointed questions like I always do, to clear the obscurities up. So don't feel alone as if you are the only one swirling around right now.

If you want to go in a certain direction that has been introduced, go ahead. If you want to open a new topic, that's ok too. Anyone else want to throw some news in?

MetPhys@aol.com

**99.69.4 144 Digit of Pi = 666 Forward/Backward (MetPhys)**

From: MetPhys@aol.com

To: Jerryiuliano

Subject: 144 Digit of Pi = 666 Forward/Backward (MetPhys)

Date: 09/29/02

Electrons and Mythologies Section: 99.69.2.

<< This diamond like shape is also a 666 and a reverse 666 if one look at it from the point of view of the whole mode box 99.58.17. Each triangle is three minor 6th leaps. These triangles are standing back to back. Perhaps it is the first 144 Pi numbers plus the mirror Pi numbers simultaneously, which both add up to 666. >>

Sir,

Luigi musically calculated the mirror of the first 144 digits of Pi that you previously informed me, added to 666. After doing so and then adding the mirror of the forward set, he found the second mirrored set added to 666 also. This mirror is not a reversed duplicate of numbers but is the inversions of music and is found in many other mirroring schemes of nature.

You can find this mirroring in Luigi's concept of the Mode Box and in other places.

MetPhys@aol.com

**99.69.5 The Giza Communications / Synchronizing Device (MetPhys)**

From: MetPhys@aol.com

To: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

Subject: The Giza Communications / Synchronizing Device (MetPhys)

Date: 09/30/02

The Giza Communications / Synchronizing Device

Hi Luigi,

One week ago I mentioned that I was going to deliver more information to you about the Cheops pyramid and here it is. I just added many new thoughts tying the Cheops pyramid to music and to scalar transmission (scalar = outward) between star systems and earth monuments.

Can you guesstimate the frequency and wavelength of the 4 shafts by knowing the lengths and diameters? I believe I have frequency formulas and frequency conversion tables on my site for that. I think many people would like to know how much musical theory you can extrapolate from the most mysterious monument on the planet. I don't believe it has ever been done before and if anyone can see the music, you are that person.

MetPhys@aol.com

**99.69.6 The Giza Communications / Synchronizing Device (Luigi)**

From: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

To: MetPhys@aol.com

Subject: The Giza Communications / Synchronizing Device (Luigi)

Date: 09/30/02

Hi Robert

I'm afraid I have been offline for the last four days with more computer trouble. I have just this moment got back online, so I'll need about a day to catch up. The Cheops has been in my mind for twelve years as a replica of what happens in a mode box. I am not saying that is a correct hunch to have, except that there is that 666 and the triangles etc associated with the mode boxes. So it must be worth at least a few attempts to see if there is any truth in it. Maybe we can attempt a bit of mapping now!

Lui

**99.69.7 Barbara Hero's Cassette Recordings (MetPhys)**

From: MetPhys@aol.com

To: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

Subject: Barbara Hero's Cassette Recordings (MetPhys)

Date: 09/30/02

Hi there Luigi,

Do you happen to have a cassette tape player for those little tapes (4 x 2 1/2 in, 10cm x 6.5cm)?

I thought you might find this audio study very interesting. I don't think I've ever heard anything like it before from any other source. I have 4 cassettes of Barbara Hero's recordings that she and her team made. Wdestiny44 (Sharon) was kind enough to simply give them to me as a research gift. I thought you would like to at least hear the sounds and possibly try to copy the tones and name the scales and note series.

Here are the titles of the tapes:

1. Music of Our Organs, Our Key Energy Centers, Our Solar System, The Stars, The Platonic Solids and The Periodic Table of Elements.

2. Lambdoma Music of the Spine.

3. Improvisation Music on the Tetra-Harp.

4. Grand Gallery Sounds, Galaxy Sounds.

MetPhys@aol.com

**99.69.8 The Giza Communications / Synchronizing Device (Luigi)**

From: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

To: MetPhys@aol.com

Subject: The Giza Communications / Synchronizing Device (Luigi)

Date: 09/30/02

Hi Robert

I been working on a little info regarding Cheops. I have only had a chance to skim over the article from your site that you sent, but it is fascinating how I saw in front of my eyes some of the arguments brewing in my own head! Without knowing why I have this 'opinion' I resonate very strongly with the view that there is a 'reverse' pyramid, and that Cheops has a mirror partner. There is the Pi numbers which at 144 either side of an axis add up to 666. Then there is the F# connection, which may have correlation with the labyrinth like structure of the mode box. The funniest thing about the article you sent seems to be that I ain't alone in having 'nutty' thoughts!

Lui

**99.69.9 The Giza Communications / Synchronizing Device (Luigi)**

From: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

To: MetPhys@aol.com

Subject: The Giza Communications / Synchronizing Device (Luigi)

Date: 10/03/02

<< In my method (Grace, 1999), if a drawing is made of the interior passages and chambers of the Giza pyramid, then is inverted / flipped and placed under the original upright pyramid, attached base to base to make an 8-sided octahedron, the shape become a diamond with the apex inverted below and not as David indicated with his extended side lines forming one larger pyramid, nor as Kenneth with one inversion only, nor as the third theory of an invisible pyramid above. This is done to fulfill the hints of its proper intent as a pyramid. >>

Your statement is so coincidental to what I have realized lately. I thought it was wishful thinking that a mirror pyramid could be underneath, and perhaps the gateway is at the Sphinx?! Well anything seems to be possible.

From this diamond shape comes the star of David as well as the Merkaba. I wonder if this is also linked to the male/female triangles. Because if it was then there is the potential for some music-mapping. The mode box produces the same shape, and this shape is tracing two augmented triangles of frequencies. Perhaps the pyramid is at the neutral point between expansion and contraction. That is where F# is within the C Major mode box.

Anyway, all these years of being led to doing experiments I don't quite understand is beginning to make sense! In which case I know that we are all being guided here and it can only be because something wants to be born or reborn.

I have something I want to pass by you if that's ok. It involves the Overtone series and a Chapter in Genesis, where it lists new births. I realized last year that there may be a hidden number system within this chapter. Basically the new births mentioned in Genesis are also the new notes that are generated by the overtone series. I can save it as a pdf and send you it (it's only a couple of pages). I also have a document that shows a similarity with the mode box and the I-ching.

Luigi

PS: I am looking in the Ramsey book to find the table that shows lengths and diameters as equated with musical notes. I may scan this diagram in for you, or perhaps draw one so it is a smaller file.

**99.69.10 Brainwave frequencies (Luigi)**

From: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

To: MetPhys@aol.com

Subject: Brainwave frequencies (Luigi)

Date: 10/03/02

Hi Robert,

Have been distracted from my intended task! I was reading this article earlier and decided to put the brainwave frequencies to notes. I am sure this has been done lots of times, although I did notice an enharmonic 3rd interval amongst all the numbers. Hope you find it useful.

If doubling a frequency produces octaves of the same note, then the notes that cover the Delta range at 0.75 - 4.50 become parts of Alpha and other functions. Obviously the effect that is associated with Delta would be lost if its frequency were raised to beyond its own parameters. Yet we are also witnessing similar notes functioning in different roles according to the frequency with which they oscillate at.

0.75 - 4.50, 1.50 - 9, 3 - 18, 6 - 36, 12 -72 = octaves of Delta

4.75 - 7.75, 9.50 - 15.50, 19 - 31, 38 - 62, = octaves of Theta

8 - 12.25, 16 - 24.50, 32 - 49, 64 - 98 = octaves of Alpha

12.50 - 15, 25 - 30, 50 - 60, 100 - 120 = octaves of Sigma

15.25 - 24.75, 30.50 - 49.5, 61 - 99, = octaves of Beta

25 - 34.75, 50 - 69.50, 100 - 139 = octaves of Gamma 1

35 - 44.75, 70 - 89, 140 - 178 = octaves of gamma 2

Note that it ends at 45 (44.75).

The frequencies as notes are:

0.75 - 4.50 = G (-36cents) to D (- 34). This is a perfect 5th interval.

4.75 - 7.75 = Eb (-40) to B (+7). This is a minor 6th interval

8 - 12.25 = C (-38) to G. This is a perfect 5th interval

12.50 - 15 = G (+35) to A# (-49). This is an enharmonic third

15.25 - 24.75 = B (-21) to G (+18). This is a minor 6th interval.

25 - 34.75= G (+35) to C# (+5). This is a tri-tone.

35 - 44.75 = C# (+18) to F (+33). This is a major 3rd interval.

These notes can be raised by octaves and will remain in similar relationship.

Luigi

**99.69.11 Hexagrams and the Modes (Luigi)**

From: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

To: MetPhys@aol.com

Subject: Hexagrams and the Modes (Luigi)

Date: 10/03/02

Hi Robert

Just added a few lines to this document I had previously half written. It probably sucks but nevertheless there is an uncanny correlation happening between the way modes pair together when mirrored and the opposite hexagrams. Anyway, it may give one further insight so I'll pass it by you.

Luigi

The I-Ching Connotations (PDF Doc)

**99.69.12 (5 Formulas, TOE) (Iuliano)**

From: Jerryiuliano

To: MetPhys@aol.com

Subject: (5 Formulas) (Iuliano)

Date: 10/03/02

Sir:

If one is to have a unification of the "one-world view" to the "Theory of everything " both physically and spiritually, then the exact symbolic semantics to word or consciousness associations must be absolute in their symbolism, not only as an actual mathematical representation of the real values of Nature but exactly and immediately as a total spiritual entity of consciousness that is comprised of man's innate aesthetic sentient genre, meaning every object in the equation of life has an unique function to one object ( to every object), to one meaning (to all meanings) ,to one function (to all functions) ...what is the sound of one hand clapping? .....May I offer the following for your perusal, the equations that solve this problem, the mathematical Koans that show the link between spirituality (mind) and physics (real) as direct symbolic to real attachments: the sound of one hand clapping ::::::: in radians:

cos[[(uncharge(Christ/Yuga)) double]charge]equals

....l...........l..............l..........l..............l........l.............l

....l...........l..............l..........l..............l........l.............l

..cos[[( sqrt(....... 37../..1.08 ))..*2]^...2]......... = .367872975

[(Hebrew;Leahy)^Cheops]/Leahy]equals

.............l....................l.............l..........l

.............l....................l.............l..........l

.......[ 288 ^.........(ht/bl) ]/100......= .367872975

cos(God/fine-structure constant)equals

....l.....l..............l................................l

....l.....l..............l................................l

..cos(1../..137.036000986 )........= .367872975

Yuga = 1.080008165...

ht = 486.2565483...

bl = 763.81

2*bl/ht = Pi = 3.141592654...

[[(Hebrew;Leahy)^Cheops]/Leahy]^(God/Cheops)equals

..............l......................l.............l..........l.........l...........l

..............l......................l.............l..........l.........l...........l

......[[ 288 ^ ..........(ht/bl)]/100 ] ^ (1 / (ht/bl)) = i ^ i

ht = 486.258404

bl = 763.81

i = square root negative one

[Leahy/(Hebrew;Leahy)^(Cheops/double)equals

......l.................l......................l..........l.............l

......l.................l......................l..........l.............l

..100../....( 82944 ^........(ht/bl/...2....))... = natural log e

ht = 486.2589187..

bl = 763.81

e = 2.718281828...

logarithm[((God/fine-structure)(Christ charged)]equalsCheops double

........l.............l.............l.......................l..........l.............l.........l.............l

........l.............l.............l.......................l..........l.............l.........l.............l

.......log......[(1 /......a(em) ) ..* ...( .37 ^ ....2..) ].....=...(ht/bl)... *2

ht = 486.256005975

bl = 763.81

a(em) = 1/137.036000986

[[antilogarithm(Druid light/Christ)]]/antichrist]charge equals(God/fine-structure)

.........l.......................l.................l..................l..............l...........l..........l..........l

.........l.......................l.................l..................l..............l...........l..........l..........l

...[[ 10 ^........(143.999../......37 ) ] .../..666 ] ^ ^...2.........=..........1../..a(em)

Druid "double" light = 288

Druid "single" light = 144 (actual used = 143.999987994..)

a(em) = 1/137.036000986....

All references as follows:

Cheops constructs:Sources for Cheops pyramid constructs:

Flinders-Petrie (1883)....section 144

http://members.optushome.com.au./fmetrol/petrie/C21.html

height... = 5776 English inches

base leg = 9073 English inches

Churchward/Ramsey (1910)....

http://www.charm.net/~ces/trade/tback.html

height ....= 486.256 English feet

base leg = 763.81 English feet

Howard Vyse (1830's).....

from the book, The Geometry of Art and Life, by Matila Ghyka,p.22

height.....= 148.2 meters

base leg = 232.8 meters

Leahy: 82944 " area of triple logic cube"

Leahy: 100: "thinking NOW created 100"

http://www.dgleahy.com/dgl/p23.html

Hebrew: 288 sparks

http://www.inner.org/HEBLETER/tzadik.htm

http://www.thirtysevenbooks.com/Arizal/Pinchas5761.htm

http://www.levity.com/alchemy/luria.html

http://www.koshertorah.com/thk7.html

Yuga: 108

http://www.hubcom.com/tantriic/subha.htm

http://philtar.ucsm.ac.uk/encyclopedia/hindu/ascetic/iskcon.html

http://uk.geocities.com/tantraifc/mother_kali_tara.html

http://www.wordman.com/gallery432/432myth.htm

Beta .37:

37 Egyptian dieties...

http://www.themystica.com/mystica/articles/h/hex.html

.37 Beta,anamolous exponent for second order phase transitions

http://webphysics.iupui.edu/251Sp97GFApr28.html

Christ 37 : from the book Theomatics by Jerry Lucas, concerning the gematric value of 37 is exactly calculated as and is associated to the Christ number as referenced as either the "first light 144" or the "second light 288".

to all of these and the correct interpretations of such as those above.

J.Iuliano

**99.69.13 Cheops as the ultimate quark (Iuliano)**

From: Jerryiuliano

To: MetPhys@aol.com

Subject: Cheops as the ultimate quark (Iuliano)

Date: 10/05/02

Sir:

....from the book by Brian Greene "The Elegant Universe" page 9 which goes on to talk about quarks...

Physicists have recognized a pattern among these particles, displayed in Table l.l. The matter particles neatly fall into three groups, which are often called families. Each family contains two of the quarks, an electron or one of it's cousins, and one of the neutrino species. The corresponding particle types across the three families have identical properties EXCEPT for their masses, which grows larger in each successive family. The upshot is that physicists have now probed the structure of matter to scales of about a billionth of a billionth meter and shown that everything encountered to date--whether it occurs naturally or is produced artificially with giant atom smashers-- consists of some combination of particles from these three families and their anti-matter partners.

A glance at Table l.l will no doubt leave you with an even stronger sense of bewilderment at the discovery of the muon. The arrangement into families at least gives some semblance of order, but innumerable "why's" leap to the fore. Why are there so many fundamental particles, especially when it seems the greater majority of things in the world around us only need electrons and up-quarks and down-quarks? Why are there three families?...Why do the particles have a seemingly random spread of masses? These are strange, seemingly random numbers. Did they occur by chance, by some divine choice, or is there a comprehensible scientific explanation for these fundamental features of our universe?...end quote

The number of masses in multiples of the proton from Greene's Table l.l

U = Up-quark = .0047 ...spin = +2/3

D = Down -quark = .0074 ...spin = -1/3..(used in formula .007399040096)

C = Charm-quark = 1.6...spin = + 2/3

S = Strange-quark =. 16...spin = -1/3

T = Top-quark = 189... spin = + 2/3

B = Bottom quark = 5.2...spin = -1/3

Brian Greene's answer to his last question can be shown as a contemplative function from real to symbolic by the Cheops constructs...ht/bl

ht = 486.256005975 ft

bl = 763.81 ft.....(Churchward/Ramsey 1910)

Contemplate the six quarks as one-sixth, split into two families..the spin -1/3 family and spin 2/3 family. sum as a product of zero in quotient that is:

0/1 = 0 = impossible equation

Product the masses as two sets of families of the six quarks to fit the parameters of the "impossible" equation:

B * C * D / T / S / U = symbolically 0/1...because

B -1/3 + C 2/3 + D -1/3 = 0.....and

T 2/3 + S -1/3 + U 2/3 = 1

....However when switching to their "seemingly random" masses and used in the two family matrix crossover equation the answer appears as the log of this result, the Cheops ratio (ht/bl):

The first equation describes the symmetry:

log ( 10 * B * C * D * / T / S / U ) = ht/bl

or using anti-log to symmetry:

10 ^ (( ht/bl) - 1) = B * C * D / T / S / U

The Root radius of matter is the radius of the Hydrogen atom (.037 pn) which when introduced into the quark symmetry automatically creates the amplitude for an electron to emit or absorb a photon off the Hydrogen shell, otherwise known as the fine-structure constant = a(em) = 1/137.036000986...

.037 * T * S * U / B / C / D = sqrt a(em)

since the fine-structure constant has the factors: (e^2) / 2 /E / h / c = a(em)

e = elementary charge

E =electric constant

h = Plancks constant

c =speed of light

Then the following equivalences can be shown:

[ e / .037) * B * C * D / T / S / U ] ^ 2 = 2 * E * h *c

To release to quark/Cheops symmetry:

(( sqrt( 2*E*h*c)) * .037/e = B * C * D / T / S / U

(( sqrt( 2*E*h*c)) * .037/e = 10^ ( ht/bl ) - 1)

Since God equals unity then the T.O.E. of quarks equals Cheops!

(log ( B * C * D / T / S / U )) + God = Cheops

So written as a mathematical symbolic to real form: a mathematical Haiku

logarithm( bottom charm down /.....top /...strange/up)plus God = Cheops

......l.................l..........l.........l..............l..........l..........l........l......l.........l.....

......l.................l..........l.........l..............l..........l..........l........l......l.........l.....

....log (..........5.2*...1.6*.007399 /189 / .16 / 0047)..+.... 1...= ht/bl

J.Iuliano

**99.69.14 Brainwave frequencies (Luigi)**

From: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

To: MetPhys@aol.com

Subject: Brainwave frequencies (Luigi)

Date: 10/05/02

Hi Robert

This small pdf may be quite easy for you to get your head around nowadays. It shows why F# is the uninvolved fountain of tonality.

If the fountain is uninvolved then F# is the uninvolved/invisible axis. The note C is the involved/visible. There is a major/minor mode combination throughout. There is also the Dorian/Dorian perfectly symmetrical combination. Is it a coincidence that maleness and femaleness accompany each other around these axis positions? There are so many other examples where one discovers the visible and invisible axis points acting as a pair that one is tempted to wonder if the structure is not some blueprint, and not just for a song, although everything sings, even Bob Dylan!

Luigi

Modal Pairs Distribution from F# (PDF Doc)

**99.69.15 Quark Unification (Iuliano)**

From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com

To: MetPhys@aol.com

Subject: Quark Unification (Iuliano)

Date: 10/20/02

MP:

In response as to a further explanation of the quark forms as a function of light to electron response..fine-structure constant, a(em), the law of logarithms is invoked to apply each quarks value as a sum/minus function, rather than a product/quotient function, a rather strange alchemic mathematical transformation that explains an associative and distributive connection...there (is) not supposed to be any??...formula as follows:

10^[2+(2*logB)+(2*logC)+(2*logD)-(2*logT)-(2*logS)-(2*logU)-log(.37^2) =1/a(em)

The divine/origin of the SIX particles of Nature...aka quarks..B=bottom;C=Charm;D=Down;T=Top; S=Strange; U=Up.....exists as a function of fine-structure constant, a(em), and Beta (.37)....the anamolous exponent used in equations of second-order phase transitions. The ultimate "unconscious-measure", Cheops constructs..ht/bl.., mathematically links the two forms:

1 + ( logB + logC + logD - logT - logS - logU ) = ht/bl

and...

[ log 1/a(em) + log(.37^2) ] / 2 = ht/bl

and by law of logarithms...

[ log ( B * C * D / T / S / U ) ] + 1 = ht/bl.....ht = 486.256006, bl = 763.81

The original fine-structure constant equation simplifies through the Hydrogen radius...037 pm and by logarithmic absorption....

[ ( B * C * D * / T / S / U / ) ^ 2 ] / (.037^2) = 1/a(em) = 137.036000986

Values for quarks in the following article.......

Hi Rybo,

I saw your comments about spirit. It reminded me of what seems implicit in Arthur's work, that is that one may almost literally equate spirit, consciousness, and the photon.

I am offering a challenge to anyone who wants to ponder a bit...What are the essential differences between the three terms?

I can think of six similarities. Are they different terms from different disciplines (ways of knowing) for the same thing?...the ultimate mystery.

If there is no essential difference that can be supported by logic (at least) then the implications of the equation of them is well worth discussing.

Hi to all on this list. I have been quiet for sometime.

Sorry, I can't follow the formulas either. To unravel them...first to educate myself, would side track me so I must pass up the opportunity to grow by gaining understanding of this fascination avenue. I do think Arthur was correct about math being the Queen of Science.

My best to all, Bob in Kansas

JerryIuliano@aol.com wrote:

<< If one is to have a unification of the "one-world view" to the "Theory of everything " both physically and spiritually, >>

Being a little picky here Jerry but to be more precise i think you say physically and metaphysically. This is the first subdivision (subcategories) of Universe a.k.a. God{dess}, Mother Nature, Great Moma, Allah, The Whole-Sha-Bang and All.

Spirit as with many things or concepts have two or more interpretations, or definitions, that are sub categories of the physical and metaphysical.

Spirit is many time viewed as a physica ergo energy related thing.

E.g. alcohol is often been called spirits and is one spirits definitions in my dictionary.

Below you equate spirit or spirituality with mind. That is a metaphysical use of the word spirit. It implies that some of decisions made from a thoughtful consideration of events and thoughtful considerations as to what actions are to be taken to any events.

I like very much you attempts to come forth with any formulas that will help mathematicians see the commonality of all things --the physical-- and non-things metaphysical and those that may lie between or in both camps of which gravity is more specific to than any other thing or non-thing i can think of.

Unfortunately either i haven't found time to follow you equations through, either because they are to complex for me and should be left for mathematicians and others much more educated than myself or they just quite simple but I'm just not seeing them correctly yet.

Any refinements to clarify and simplify will be greatly appreciated by the masses, of which i may be a good representative of because i have at least received a GED and been able to read some books on the science of our Cosmic Nature.

I hope to hear more from you. I'm not sure if i have you web address Pleas post it and if you can make it linkable by clicking on it and the addresses below would also help out.

My guess assessment of Arthurs work related to it all in a simple formula or picture is the torus being both involuting and evoluting. It evolutes outward radiationally but is trapped by geodesics of space-time gravity and come inward to involute back on itself.

Fullers simplified model is the tetrahedron with three of radial open edges radiating outward from a single vertex only to be confined by a closed circumferential triangle.

Both of the above equating to love or spirit etc. of all things having two basic characteristics of outward open ended radiation as free radiating love and the circumferential gravity as closed, embracing love.

Sincerely, Rybo

.....................from the book by Brian Greene "The Elegant Universe" page 9 which goes on to talk about quarks...

Physicists have recognized a pattern among these particles, displayed in Table l.l. The matter particles neatly fall into three groups, which are often called families. Each family contains two of the quarks, an electron or one of it's cousins, and one of the neutrino species. The corresponding particle types across the three families have identical properties EXCEPT for their masses, which grows larger in each successive family. The upshot is that physicists have now probed the structure of matter to scales of about a billionth of a billionth meter and shown that everything encountered to date--whether it occurs naturally or is produced artificially with giant atom smashers-- consists of some combination of particles from these three families and their anti-matter partners.

A glance at Table l.l will no doubt leave you with an even stronger sense of bewilderment at the discovery of the muon. The arrangement into families at least gives some semblance of order, but innumerable "why's" leap to the fore. Why are there so many fundamental particles, especially when it seems the greater majority of things in the world around us only need electrons and up-quarks and down-quarks? Why are there three families?...Why do the particles have a seemingly random spread of masses? These are strange, seemingly random numbers. Did they occur by chance, by some divine choice, or is there a comprehensible scientific explanation for these fundamental features of our universe?...end quote

The number of masses in multiples of the proton from Greene's Table l.l

U = Up-quark = .0047 ...spin = +2/3

D = Down -quark = .0074 ...spin = -1/3..(used in formula .007399040096)

C = Charm-quark = 1.6...spin = + 2/3

S = Strange-quark = .16...spin = -1/3

T = Top-quark = 189... spin = + 2/3

B = Bottom quark = 5.2...spin = -1/3

Brian Greene's answer to his last question can be shown as a contemplative function from real to symbolic by the Cheops constructs...ht/bl

ht = 486.256005975 ft

bl = 763.81 ft.....(Churchward/Ramsey 1910)

Contemplate the six quarks as one-sixth, split into two families..the spin -1/3 family and spin 2/3 family. sum as a product of zero in quotient that is:

0/1 = 0 = impossible equation

Product the masses as two sets of families of the six quarks to fit the parameters of the "impossible" equation:

B * C * D / T / S / U = symbolically 0/1...because

B -1/3 + C 2/3 + D -1/3 = 0.....and

T 2/3 + S -1/3 + U 2/3 = 1

....However when switching to their "seemingly random" masses and used in the two family matrix crossover equation the answer appears as the log of this result , the Cheops ratio (ht/bl):

The first equation describes the symmetry:

log ( 10 * B * C * D * / T / S / U ) = ht/bl

or using anti-log to symmetry:

10 ^ (( ht/bl) - 1) = B * C * D / T / S / U

The Root radius of matter is the radius of the Hydrogen atom (.037 pm) which when introduced into the quark symmetry automatically creates the amplitude for an electron to emit or absorb a photon off the Hydrogen shell, otherwise known as the fine-structure constant = a(em) = 1/137.036000986...

.037 * T * S * U / B / C / D = sqrt a(em)

since the fine-structure constant has the factors: (e^2) / 2 /E / h / c = a(em)

e = elementary charge

E =electric constant

h = Plancks constant

c =speed of light

Then the following equivalences can be shown:

[ e / .037) * B * C * D / T / S / U ] ^ 2 = 2 * E * h *c

To release to quark/Cheops symmetry:

(( sqrt( 2*E*h*c)) * .037/e = B * C * D / T / S / U

(( sqrt( 2*E*h*c)) * .037/e = 10^ ( ht/bl ) - 1)

Since God equals unity then the T.O.E. of quarks equals Cheops!

(log ( B * C * D / T / S / U )) + God = Cheops

So written as a mathematical symbolic to real form: a mathematical Haiku

logarithm( bottom charm down / top / strange / up)plus God = Cheops

.....l.............l..........l..........l..........l..........l..........l......l.......l...........l.....

.....l.............l..........l..........l..........l..........l..........l......l.......l...........l.....

log (.......5.2 * 1.6 *.007399.. /189 / .16 / .0047) + 1 = ht/bl

J.Iuliano

Sources for the Cheops pyramid constructs:

Flinders-Petrie (1883)....section 144

http://members.optushome.com.au./fmetrol/petrie/C21.html

height... = 5776 English inches

base leg = 9073 English inches

Churchward/Ramsey (1910)....

http://www.charm.net/~ces/trade/tback.html

height ....= 486.256 English feet

base leg = 763.81 English feet

Howard Vyse (1830's).....

from the book, The Geometry of Art and Life, by Matila Ghyka,p.22

height.....= 148.2 meters

base leg = 232.8 meters

Beta .37:

37 Egyptian dieties...

http://www.themystica.com/mystica/articles/h/hex.html

.37 Beta,anamolous exponent for second order phase transitions

http://webphysics.iupui.edu/251Sp97GFApr28.html

Somebody sent this to me...7/11 = 486.0609091/763.81 = ht/bl

Hello Jerry,

Many thanks for bringing to my attention the most interesting and fascinating relationships between physical constants and Cheops pyramid. Perhaps you might find the following of interest:

Michael

7 / 11 In Egypt has been left the Great pyramid, an "ELEVEN" touching the ground and rising "SEVEN" skywards. Author Alan Watts has shown that scattered over the UK are triangles of the SAME proportion on the GROUND, marked by towns, etc. Divine numbers: Earth =11, each atom of the chemical elements is a 7, spiritual purity/perfection is likewise a 7 (invisible light is also a 7). THUS, the Great pyramid has a base length of "ELEVEN" which indeed touches another 11, the Earth. Viewed from the ground it rises "SEVEN" (symbolically upwards into the "spiritual" world). Viewed from the air, "we see a "SEVEN" descending into an "ELEVEN". Symbolically "earth (11) is comprised of 7s. Whilst in the UK we have both the 11 and the 7 "ON" the Earth, implying that 11 and 7 are related - ALL on Earth, an ELEVEN, is comprised of atoms, the SEVENS. A TRUTH. So, UK is a country of the MATERIAL, whilst Egypt is additionally SPIRITUAL. Now 11 divided by 7 (11/7) is equivalent to p /2. So we have pi over or sitting on TWO. The Earth value 11 reduces to 2 (1+1=2). The architects/priests of the pyramid are telling us that Earth is either 2 or 11!! (Whereas, we modern day humans are taught that it has a diameter of 7920 miles or 12756 kilometres). "ELEVEN rising SEVEN" 5040 is a special number because it factorizes to the decimal counting system: 5040 = 1x2x3x4x5x6x7 and 5040 also = 7x8x9x10 .......5040 contains the digits of the "absolute" distance of 50.4 million miles to the planet Mars (textbooks give 49). "504" as a Divine number is 7, whilst Mars is 58.5040 has 58 different whole number factors (2, 3, 4, 5, .....2520). So, 50.4 million miles or 7 LEAD to a FIFTYEIGHT (Mars). DOES the Great pyramid inform the same info? If the height of the pyramid is extended by 20 feet, a new height of 504 feet is attained (484 + 20).The sides of the 2-D pyramid move to the new positions shown in the sketch. By an increase in angle of 1.7 degrees. (Arrival of SEVEN!! and one). 1 7 has a correspondence with invisible light and "perfect(ed) spirit -ONE which is a SEVEN. So our pyramid "reaches" Mars - by involvement of the "20" and the "17" -"perfected (17) spirit from the Earth (2 =11)" Conclusion: EARTH has a MATERIAL correspondence (obviously you will be thinking) MARS has a SPIRITUAL significance, as well as the normal material one to our NORMAL mode of perception.

**99.69.16 Quark Unification (Iuliano)**

From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com

To: MetPhys@aol.com

Subject: Quark Unification (Iuliano)

Date: 10/22/02

Just a brief reminder here to Rybo and Lisa about a point which Arthur continuously stresses throughout all his books and articles, and which is essential to his theory:

1) "Action" (Level I) is counted and not measured, as is "energy" (Level II).

2) The ("non-local," spaceless, timeless, massless, chargeless) "quantum of action" is a potential rotational "packet" which gives rise to energy & time or momentum & position etc., (Heisenberg) as the potential packet "activates".

3) The "quantum of action" (Level I) is ontologically prior to "mass/energy" or substance (Level II), and the two cannot be equated.

4) The "quantum of action" (Level I) is ontologically prior to structure or form (Level III), and the two cannot be equated.

5) Geometry per se occurs on Level III, where conceptual relationships (in the matrix of "mental space") can be measured. Level III concepts (and thus geometry) can define and point to Level I and Level II entities but they certainly cannot be equated with them. For example, Arthur disagreed with Einstein that force (which manifests on the linear, temporal, experiential realm of Level II, i.e., it changes things in time) is equivalent to a mathematical field (which abstracts time and manifests on the spatial, non-experiential realm of Level III). In other words, measurable, non-experiential, non-participatory, conceptual "space" is ontological different from non-measurable, experiential, participatory, non-conceptual "time". But please don't take my word for it; read Arthur, especially "A Formalism for Philosophy" and "Constraint and Freedom" (or any and all of his books).

In short, (the quantum of) "action" and "energy" are ontologically different and cannot be equated.

Frank Barr

AYG:

I respectfully disagree with Barr's Points # 2 and # 3 including his conclusion because of the following:.....

Upon further analysis of the Cheops-quark equations, it was observed that the Strange and Charm quarks were renormalisable through the logarithmic factor, that is, as a scalar, Strange -quark mass (in proton masses....(.16) times TEN equals Charm-quark mass (1.6), which means the quarks can be grouped into spin like families through the Cheops (ht/bl) equation without invariance.

ALTERNATING SPIN GROUP: BCD = woman ; TSU = man

log[(Bof-1/3)*(Cof2/3)*(Dof-1/3)/(Tof2/3)/(Sof-1/3)/(Uof2/3)] + 1 = ht/bl

SAME SPIN GROUP: BSD (-1/3) = hermaphrodite ; TCU (+2/3) = hermophrodite

log[(Bof-1/3)*(Sof-1/3)*(Dof-1/3)/(Tof2/3)/(Cof2/3)/(Uof2/3)] + 3 = ht/bl

Leahy's philosophy of the "thinking NOW,created 100" can be expressed as a function of the radius of the Hydrogen atom (.037 pm), in that as precursor to creation , the potential for existence (Barr's quantum of action) is connected to the 100th part of the Hydrogen radius as a virtual form that can renormalise through the fine-structure constant into the reality of protons and electrons.

ALTERNATING SPIN GROUP: woman/man and fine-structure(real action)

[(B*C*D/T/S/U)^2]/(.037^2) = 1/a(em) = 137.036000986

SAME SPIN GROUP: herma and hermo (virtual-quantum of action)

[(B*S*D/T/C/U)^2]/(.00037^2) = 1/a(em) = 137.036000986

By placing quarks into their same spin families ,segregated by -1/3 in numerator and 2/3 in denominator, creates the "virtual" form of matter (100th radius of Hydrogen),... the spark to create real, bi-polar, Adam and Eve, woman / man, equations is by alternating quark family spins and injecting Leahy's "thinking NOW,created 100" to the radius of the Hydrogen atom....from (virtual) .00037pm to (real) .037pm. The equivalence of the two equations refutes points #3 and #4 which says there is no equivalences between "virtual" and "real". There is an equivalency ..the fine-structure constant.

The two forms of equations listed above, also interact directly with the sums of the quark-spin family groups of the SIX quarks to solve the great mystery of the proton/electron energy ratio: NIST 1998 values for pmev and emev:

pmev/emev = proton/electron = 938.271998/.510998902 = 1836.15266946..

Using same spin groups as numerator and denominator with Hydrogen radius:

[[[[(-(1/3)-(1/3)-(1/3)/((2/3)+(2/3)+(2/3))]^2] /(.03699997775^2)]*10]+10 =

pmev/emev = 1836.15266946..

Note the scale of renormalization accomplished by the TEN forms, one as product, one as sum. The fine-structure constant- quark mass-quark spin equation form is:

[( X / Y ) ^ 2 ] / .037 = 1/a(em) or pmev/emev....depending upon what you substitute for X , Y with the Hydrogen radius..quark masses gives fine-structure constant; quark spin gives mass ratios..pmev/emev, when aligned in their respective spin families (-1/3 and +2/3). This is counter-intuitive for one would think that quark spins (a mysterious concept, how can you have a negative 1/3 spin?etc..) should be associated with the dimensionless fine-structure constant, while quark masses should be associated to the "hard" things..mass and energy..pmev and emev..of Nature. But the equations demonstrate the opposite.

....from the book by Brian Greene "The Elegant Universe" page 9 which goes on to talk about quarks...

Physicists have recognized a pattern among these particles, displayed in Table l.l. The matter particles neatly fall into three groups, which are often called families. Each family contains two of the quarks, an electron or one of it's cousins, and one of the neutrino species. The corresponding particle types across the three families have identical properties EXCEPT for their masses, which grows larger in each successive family. The upshot is that physicists have now probed the structure of matter to scales of about a billionth of a billionth meter and shown that everything encountered to date--whether it occurs naturally or is produced artificially with giant atom smashers-- consists of some combination of particles from these three families and their anti-matter partners.

A glance at Table l.l will no doubt leave you with an even stronger sense of bewilderment at the discovery of the muon. The arrangement into families at least gives some semblance of order, but innumerable "why's" leap to the fore. Why are there so many fundamental particles, especially when it seems the greater majority of things in the world around us only need electrons and up-quarks and down-quarks? Why are there three families?...Why do the particles have a seemingly random spread of masses? These are strange, seemingly random numbers. Did they occur by chance, by some divine choice, or is there a comprehensible scientific explanation for these fundamental features of our universe?...end quote

The number of masses in multiples of the proton from Greene's Table l.l

U = Up-quark = .0047 ...spin = +2/3

D = Down -quark = .0074 ...spin = -1/3..(used in formula .007399040096)

C = Charm-quark = 1.6...spin = + 2/3

S = Strange-quark = .16...spin = -1/3

T = Top-quark = 189... spin = + 2/3

B = Bottom quark = 5.2...spin = -1/3

Brian Greene's answer to his last question can be shown as a contemplative function from real to symbolic by the Cheops constructs...ht/bl

ht = 486.256005975 ft

bl = 763.81 ft.....(Churchward/Ramsey 1910)

Contemplate the six quarks as one-sixth, split into two families..the spin -1/3 family and spin 2/3 family. sum as a product of zero in quotient that is:

0/1 = 0 = impossible equation

Product the masses as two sets of families of the six quarks to fit the parameters of the "impossible" equation:

B * C * D / T / S / U = symbolically 0/1...because

B -1/3 + C 2/3 + D -1/3 = 0.....and

T 2/3 + S -1/3 + U 2/3 = 1

....However when switching to their "seemingly random" masses and used in the two family matrix crossover equation the answer appears as the log of this result , the Cheops ratio (ht/bl):

The first equation describes the symmetry:

log ( 10 * B * C * D * / T / S / U ) = ht/bl

or using anti-log to symmetry:

10 ^ (( ht/bl) - 1) = B * C * D / T / S / U

The Root radius of matter is the radius of the Hydrogen atom (.037 pm) which when introduced into the quark symmetry automatically creates the amplitude for an electron to emit or absorb a photon off the Hydrogen shell, otherwise known as the fine-structure constant = a(em) = 1/137.036000986...

.037 * T * S * U / B / C / D = sqrt a(em)

since the fine-structure constant has the factors: (e^2) / 2 /E / h / c = a(em)

e = elementary charge

E =electric constant

h = Plancks constant

c =speed of light

Then the following equivalences can be shown:

[ e / .037) * B * C * D / T / S / U ] ^ 2 = 2 * E * h *c

To release to quark/Cheops symmetry:

(( sqrt( 2*E*h*c)) * .037/e = B * C * D / T / S / U

(( sqrt( 2*E*h*c)) * .037/e = 10^ ( ht/bl ) - 1)

Since God equals unity then the T.O.E. of quarks equals Cheops!

(log ( B * C * D / T / S / U )) + God = Cheops

So written as a mathematical symbolic to real form: a mathematical Haiku

logarithm( bottom charm down / top / strange / up)plus God = Cheops

.....l.............l..........l..........l..........l..........l..........l......l.......l...........l.....

.....l.............l..........l..........l..........l..........l..........l......l.......l...........l.....

log (.......5.2 * 1.6 * .007399.. /189 / .16 / .0047) + 1 = ht/bl

J.Iuliano

Sources for the Cheops pyramid constructs:

Flinders-Petrie (1883)....section 144

http://members.optushome.com.au./fmetrol/petrie/C21.html

height... = 5776 English inches

base leg = 9073 English inches

Churchward/Ramsey (1910)....

http://www.charm.net/~ces/trade/tback.html

height ....= 486.256 English feet

base leg = 763.81 English feet

Howard Vyse (1830's).....

from the book, The Geometry of Art and Life, by Matila Ghyka,p.22

height.....= 148.2 meters

base leg = 232.8 meters

**99.69.17 F# is a "Register Shift" (MetPhys)**

From: MetPhys@aol.com

To: luigi.di-martino@ntlworld.com

Subject: F# is a "Register Shift" (MetPhys)

Date: 10/22/02

Fidelio Article - Foundations of Tuning

Physical significance of the register shift

"Let us now return to our soprano. She makes the first register shift, from first to second register, exactly at this point of division. The first tetrachord, CÑDÑEÑF, is sung in the first register, while GÑAÑBÑC are sung in the second register. The register shift divides the scale exactly at the geometrical-mean or halfway point in the cycle of conical spiral action. The same process repeats in the next-higher octave, where the shift from second to third register of the soprano comes once again at F-sharp, the geometric mean.

The bel canto shift is a physical event of fundamental importance, and not merely a technical question for the voice. In physical terms, the register shift constitutes a singularity, a nonlinear phase change comparable to the transformation from ice to water or water to steam. An even better comparison is to the biological process of cell division (mitosis). In every case, we see that in C=256 tuning, the region of this singularity coincides with the principal geometrical division of conical spiral action. (Here we take the soprano voice, for musical and developmental reasons, as the fundamental reference for the human voice in general.)

Our solar system also makes a "register shift." It has long been noted that the inner planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars) all share such common features as relatively small size, solid silico-metallic surface, few moons, and no rings. The outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) share a second, contrasting set of characteristics: large size, gaseous composition, many moons, and rings. The dividing-point between these two sharply contrasting "registers" is the asteroid belt, a ring-like system of tens of thousands of fragmentary bodies believed to have arisen from an exploded planet.

It is easy to verify that the solar-system register shift falls exactly in the same, geometric-mean position, as the shift of the soprano voice in the proper C=256 tuning. If we begin at the outer layer of the sun, and construct a self-similar (logarithmic) spiral making exactly one rotation in passing from that layer to the orbit of the innermost planet, Mercury, then the continuation of that spiral will make exactly one full cycle in passing from Mercury to the region defined by the overlapping orbits of Neptune and Pluto (see Figure 11). The halfway or geometric-mean point comes exactly at the outer boundary of the asteroid belt. More precisely, if we compare the planetary spiral with our simple spiral derivation of the equal-tempered system, letting the interval from Mercury to Neptune-Pluto correspond to the octave CÑC, then the planetary orbits correspond exactly in angular displacements to the principal steps of the scale. The asteroid belt occupies exactly the angular position corresponding to the interval between F and F-sharp; this region is where the soprano makes the register-shift, in C=256 tuning. Thus, complete coherence obtains, with this tuning, between the human voice, the solar system, the musical system, and the synthetic geometry of conical spiral action.2"

A Completely Different Approach to the Vortexing, Solar System Spiral PART IV. SPIRA SOLARIS ARCHYTAS-MIRABILIS

MetPhys@aol.com

© Copyright. Robert Grace. 2002