**99.98.1 Giza Pyramid and Plato's World Series (dskhane)**

From: d.skhane@ntlworld.com

Date: Mon, 24 June 2005

To: rgrace@aemail4u.com

Subject: Giza Pyramid and Plato's World Series

Simply as an illustration betwixt all number the following ought to prove of interest, I have printed the full compliment of digits merely to illustrate the "hidden" numbers within the digits, likewise the numerous zeros that tail end with digits can be expunged via calculating/copy/pasting/ in the proper manner

The PWS {Plato's World Series} total is 125606

I have illustrated 1746 in previous postings

1836 the Grand Gallery unit

The Tetractys total is 8436

The Comma of Pythagoras being the ratio: 531441:524288

1881 is tother Grand Gallery unit

432432 is the Great Pyramid unit: 756 x 572

136080 is 1.575 x 86400 or 5.25 x 25920 or 25.772727272 x 5280 etc

6080 is the "Sea" mile

Therefore: 125606 x 1746 x 1836 = 402649627536 then this divided by 8436 = 47729922.657183499288762446657183 this divided by the Golden Mean = 29498714.482543098019054308580393

Then: 125606 / 8436 = 14.889284020862968231389284020863 and this divided by

the Golden Mean then by the Comma of Pythagoras =

9.078226939264865531539999420915 this x 136080 =

1235365.1218951629015319631211981 this into the above

29498714.482543098019054308580393 =

23.878539194379534040178571428572 this

into 1881 = 78.773663023856362685537674300596 and this into 432432 =

5489.5504842657791940789473684212 then this divided by the above

23.878539194379534040178571428572 =

229.89473684210526315789473684212 that x

6080 = 1397760.0000000000000000000000001

The 23.878539194379534040178571428572 x

587202560.00000000000000000000004 =

14021539344 {this is 1836 x 7637004 and this is 1746 x 4374 the

25th.PWS {Plato's World Series}
term}

The 1397760 is 264.727272 x 5280 if we divide the above 136080 by the 264.727272 we obtain 514.0384615384615 that divided by Sun {13.846153846153} =

37.125 and this x the FP = 39.111111111 {this x 135 = 5280}

The 587202560 is?

Derek

-----Original Message-----

From: Norma [mailto:norma27@fastmail.fm]

Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 11:14 PM

To: Joe Mason; Gary

Cc: C Miller; Liz Forrest; Derek; Robert Grace; Sharon; Ra Sun; Johanna;
Lynda; Dee; William Downie; Rita

Subject: Solstice Orion event was a 13 day

Amazing encoded data from yesterday's Orion above pyramid event:

June 21 = 71...Orion

Tuesday = 95...Process

Total is 166.....1 + 6 + 6 = 13.

As 100 = Year Theme ( Theme = 51 of Great, Top, Full, Codon )

+ 66 = Event....Ancient

Sum 166

100 = Morphing...the result of DNA changes, the 183 year theme.

100 = Eight Cells

100 = Open Chakra 8 ( higher heart, the figure 8 flow graphic )

100 = Companion...55 = Ancient...Orion is that.

100 = Harmonics, Resolved, Wednesday

66 = Family, Woman....this has outpictured early this morning with
events here. 66 also reads "Inside 6"...6 as my apt number.

100 = Hospital, 66 = Woman, Family--I emailed about my aged mother in nursing home meeting a former neighbor lady, also a patient there. 166 is sum of my mom's birth city + state, also my place of birth.

Norma

Universal Harmonics

norma27@fastmail.fm

This same graphic has personal data that stood out for me: bottom line center of 56==70==56, where 56 = Big canoe ( location where I completed & got copyright grant for my UHA manuscript ) 56 is also sum of my "gramma name". And 70th year on planet is nearing. The 511 Derek mentions, as reverse of 115 is my 11/5 birth date, 115 is sum of my first 2 names, and 35 is my year of birth. And then, the pairs of numbers each side give the mirror years of 1881, 1771, 1661...etc. which ended at 2002.

Always amazed at the flow of data that any new information provides this group of fertile minds.

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:57:06 +0100, "D.Skhane" d.skhane@ntlworld.com said:

Norma

The Pascal Triangle Number view is indeed interesting, I frequently mention the FP {Fraction of Plato} within my posts, and this is the ratio 256:243 {Dialogues of Plato: Timaeus 31-37}

The bottom row: 1 + 8 + 28 + 56 + 70 + 56 + 28 + 8 + 1 = 256

The second row up totals 128 {half of 256} the third row up totals 64 {half of 128} so on and so forth. The full total is therefore:

256 + 128 + 64 + 32 + 16 + 8 + 4 + 2 + 1 = 511

The system of Gematria allowed for the addition of a Colel {the number 1} without altering the "meaning" of the Number/Word in question

Therefore 511 + 1 = 512 this is 2 x 256, likewise your 704 minus 512 = 192 Gematria value: Mary and 256 minus 192 = 64

There are a total of 45 numbers within the diagram subsequently: 45 x 64 = 2880 this 11.25 x 256 the 11.25 obviously being 10 x 1.125

The Comma of Pythagoras is the ratio: 531441:524288, subsequently FP x FP x Comma = 1.125. Likewise via deducting a Colel {1} from the 45 numbers your

Gods Diamond central number 44 is obtained.

A section of the bottom row illustrates: 1 + 8 + 28 + 56 + 70 + 56 = 219 this is one tenth of 2190 Gematria: Son of Man

The sum 219 was reached by the sixth addition which was 56 then 6 x 56 = 336 this is the height of the Grand Gallery, likewise 336 x 2.25 = 756 the Great Pyramid base side measurement {Triangle = Pyramid}

Directly above the number 56 is 15 then 4 then 1, hence: 56 x 15 x 4 x 1 = 3360, I find this development interesting, especially since the above 2.25 is twice the 1.125 above. Likewise 2190 divided by 3360 = 0.651785714285714285 and this x 1232 = 803 that minus 704 = 99 {99 x 19 = 1881 Grand Gallery}, alternatively deduct the Pascal total of 512 from 80 to obtain 291 this is both 219 and 192 rearranged and 291 plus the 99 = 390 this x 3504 = 1366560 the Maya "super" number

The utilised 1232 is 512 + 720 and 3504 obtains: 3 x 504 = 1512 this is 0.45 x 3360

I have only established this model a pithy test out, nonetheless I can envisage supplementary data encoded within, I shall labour on this further

Derek

-----Original Message----

From: Norma [mailto:norma27@fastmail.fm]

Sent: 24 June 2005 16:15

To: Robert Grace; Liz Forrest; Sharon; Gary; Ra Sun; Johanna; Lynda; Joe Mason; William Downie; C Miller; Rita; Derek

Subject: Fwd: Re: Alphabet of 27 letters

Here is reply with great graphics of God's Diamond. The oscillated graphic he sent is a 2M size--which he did not mean to send, so I have removed it from this fwd. If he can resend it smaller, I shall fwd to group. This fellow has valuable feedback for my work, so thanks Lynda for sending his links. Everything works together...is a whole.

Also---please delete Dee from group replies & further email til she find a new server.

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:03:21 +0100, "Ant" ant@burr.wanadoo.co.uk said:

Hi Norma,

Thanks for the links I have found them interesting. I can see cubic magic square relationships.

I don't know if you have seen a top view of Pascal's triangle in cubes so I have attached it.

The same process can be applied to G0D's diamond. As Time permits, I can further translate it into cubic magic squares and see the sharing abilities when looking at it's energies.

I have also attached how my brain instantly organised G0D's diamond in the first link you mentioned. Only 2, the number in cell A1 can be changed, makes it a bit interactive...

The square gap that can be seen in the middle of values can be summed and projected up as well as down.

Would you like me to add a picture of your alphabet and a link to your site in the blank alphabets section on my site?

Ant

Robert

The Pascal triangle total is 511, the fractal total is 255 {255 + 1 = 256 an FP component} the 511 minus 255 = 256

The Pascal triangle bottom row adds to 256, the Fractal triangle bottom row adds to 128 {128 x 2 = 256}

Note now how the numbers rearrange: 255 + 552 = 807 minus 256 = 551 this + 153 = 704 {Norma}

Then 256 + 652 = 908 minus 807 = 101, I have illustrated to Norma the number 219 within the Pascal triangle therefore: 511 x 255 = 130305 this divided by 219 = 595 this + 313 = 908

Or 130 + 305 = 435 this deducted from the Pascal 511 = 76 that + 143 = 219, and 143 x 16 = 2288 capstone. As I have explained to Norma, having a moment ago observed the models in their entirety, I shall labour on them further, and I perceive a bundle of potential within both

Derek

------1

---1---1

---1--2--1.....Universal, Revelation

1--3--3--1....13, and 31 = Cube... theme for 2005

1.4....4..1...14 = N, and 41 = Dream ( Norma dream )

.........51 = Great ( pyramid )....Codon, Tampa

1661......61 = Church....Norma

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:50:19 -0700 (PDT), "Grace Roberts" rgrace@aemail4u.com said:

Norma,

Id like to add a link about The Pascal Triangle by Peter Plictha and also add CircleMath because Im very interested in how these various subject fit together, namely, The God Diamond, and StarGrail patterns, to keep it all on one page:

Plictha: [1]

Universal Harmonics God's Diamond: [2]

CircleMath: [3]

StarGrail: [4]

**99.98.2 Giza Pyramid and Plato's World Series (dskhane)**

From: d.skhane@ntlworld.com

Date: Mon, 26 June 2005

To: rgrace@aemail4u.com

Subject: Giza Pyramid and Plato's World Series

Bill

I thought the following may be of some curiosity to you

A brief insight regarding the Great Pyramid, Time, Measurement and Gematria

The Great Pyramid base perimeter is 3024 {modern day feet}

{1} 3024 + 144 = 3168: Lord Jesus Christ

{2} 3024 minus 656 = 2368: Jesus Christ

{3} 3024 minus 1544 = 1480: Son of the Cosmos

{4} 3024 minus 2136 = 888: Jesus

{5} 3024 minus 2358 = 666: Beast

{6} 3024 minus 804 = 2220; John the Baptist

There is now a requirement to validate the minus numbers therefore:

{1} 144 + 512 = 656, 512 is the 4th term of PWS and 512 minus 320 = 192: Mary

As regards the number 656 then: 6 + 5 + 6 = 17 and this x 108 = 1836 the Grand Gallery unit. The 108 + 2916 = 3024 and 2916 is the 20th term of PWS {1080 = lunar number and 1080 + 666 = 1746}

The 2916 minus 656 = 2260 and this minus 1480 = 780 {2916 minus 1746 = 1170 + 711 = 1881}

The Maya Third Sun is 312 and 780 x 0.4 = 312 {312 x 7.333333 = 2288 capstone}

The Maya "super" number is 1366560 and this is 780 x 1752

The 1752 minus 312 = 1440, etc, etc {1366560 / 13 = 105120 this is 180 x 584 {Maya/Venus} or 105120 is 72 x 1460 {Sothic cycle} 1460 is 4 x 365}

{2}As regards the tentative number 656, within the Dialogues of Plato {Laws 11} Plato mentions the Egyptian laws regarding music and dancing, likewise that no painter or artist is allowed to depart the traditional forms and invent new ones; he then mentions these forms have not changed for ten thousand years

Within Laws V1 Plato's Law number 747 mentions: {abridged}:

"Numbers have a use in respect of all the variations of which they are susceptible, both in themselves and as measures of height and depth, and in all sounds, and in motions, as well as those which proceed in a straight direction, upwards or downwards, as in those which go round and round" {I consider he covered the full spectrum here}

Now 747 + 474 = 1221 that minus 666 = 555 that + 101 = 656

Likewise 747 minus 656 = 91 that + 101 = 192 = Mary

And: 91 + 19 = 110 that minus 9 = 101, likewise 666 minus 656 = 10

And: 7 + 4 + 7 = 18 and 7 + 47 = 54 and 74 + 7 = 81 etc

{3} the 1544 minus 747 = 797 minus 656 = 141 + 414 = 555

The 15 x 44 = 660 the furlong, likewise {for Joe} 154 x 4 = 616 + 40 = 656 etc

{4} the 2136 minus 656 = 1480, likewise: 2136 minus 300 = 1836 {Grand Gallery} moreover 2368 minus 2136 = 232 + 323 = 555, or 747 minus 232 = 515 + 151 = 666.

Likewise: 21 x 36 = 756 x 4 = 3024, or 213 x 6 = 1278 minus 747 = 531 + 153 {153 x 12 = 1836} = 684 this x 8.888888 = 6080 the "Sea" mile and 6080 minus 5280 {mile} = 800 = Lord, etc

{5} the 2358 + 10 = 2368, then 23 + 58 = 81 or 235 x 8 = 1880 + 1 = 1881

Alternatively: 23 x 58 = 1334 + 666 = 2000, etc

{6} the 804 minus 747 = 57 that x 33 = 1881, or 804 minus 656 = 148

Alternatively: 804 + 656 = 1460 {Sothic cycle}

There we leave 3024, given that 3024 minus 432 = 2592, or 3024 minus 864 = 2160 there seems little benefit in illustrating the 2592 and 864 save for the following brief examples

{A} 2592 minus 2368 = 224 that x 13.5 = 3024 {13.5 x 192 = 2592}

{B} 3168 minus 2592 = 576 = Eagle, Pneuma {Breath} and 576 x 5.25 = 3024

Likewise: 747 minus 576 = 171 + 1710 = 1881{Grand Galley}, there are apparently 171 stones at Stonehenge {576 x 1.5 = 864 and 576 x 4.5 = 2592}

{C} 2592 + 2952 = 5544 minus 2288 {capstone} = 3256 minus 3168 = 88, alternatively: 5544 minus 1881 = 3663 = 5.5 x 666

{D} 5280 {mile} minus 2592 = 2688 minus 2368 = 320, or 2688 + 480 {Pyramid} = 3168 this in itself is 4.8 furlongs of 660 feet, or 3168 is 0.6 mikes of 5280 feet, etc

Likewise: 2368 / 5280 = 0.448484848 and this x 1485 = 666 the 1485 x 3.733333 = 5544 {above} and 3.733333 x 810 = 3024 {1485 / 3024 = 0.4910714285714285 and this x 10752 = 5280, the 10752 is 2592 x 4.148148148 this x 243 {FP component: 256:243} = 1008, etc, etc. Alternatively the 4.148148148 x 999 = 4144 this minus 2288 {capstone} = 1856 minus 656 = 1200 alternatively: 4 x 144 = 576 likewise: 41 x 44 = 1804 this minus 576 minus 656 = 572 {Capstone 572 x 4 = 2288}

There remain numerous combinations within the foregoing, far too many to illustrate in one fell swoop, the pleasing aspect is the dominance of the number nine since:

2 + 5 + 9 + 2 = 18

3 + 1 + 6 + 8 = 18

2 + 3 + 6 + 8 = 19 {I from 9 = 8}

6 + 6 + 6 = 18

3 + 0 + 2 + 4 = 9

5 + 2 + 8 + 0 = 15 {15 x 0.6 = 9}

8 + 6 + 4 = 18

1 + 8 + 8 + 1 = 18

1 + 8 + 3 + 6 = 18

Etceteras

Derek

Robert

The number 19 as indicated within your discourse concerning the Quran possesses numerous mathematical properties, the following are but a few

{1} 19 x 19 = 361 via dividing the Grand Gallery 1881 by this 361 we obtain: 5.210526315789473684 this multiplied by the 684 within the digits obtains: 31680 notice the repeating digits are only 18 and not 19, this also applies to 1{one} divided by 17 producing: 0.0588235294117647 now we observe 16 repeating digits and not 17

Therefore: 5.210526315789473684 divided by the 16 digit factor: 0.0588235294117647 = 88.578947368421052631 now we have procured a repeatingn18 digit pattern, likewise within 88.578947368421052631 we observe the reappearance of 684 {684x 8.888888 = 6080 the "Sea" mile}

Therefore: 88.578947368421052631 x 6080 = 538560 and this divided by 5814 {17 x 18 x 19} = 92.631578947368421052 and this x 6080 = 563200 this is 17.777777 x the above 31680 alternatively the 563200 is 106.666666 x 5280 otherwise 563200 is 86400 x 6.518518 this is 5.5 x 1.185185 {Music: 32:27}

Alternatively the other number: 538560 is 102 x 5280 otherwise 538560 is 20.777777 x 25920 or else 538560 is 6.2333333 x 86400, etc, etc

Likewise as to the 361 if we divide 6080 by 361 we obtain: 16.842105263157894736 that x 1881 = 31680

It does not finish here however, in view of the fact that: 1881 minus 361 = 1520 that x 4 = 6080

The Gematria of Mary is 152 as is 192, if we utilise the FP then 152 x the FP = 160.13168724279835390946502057613, now we have procured within the digits 3168 and 576 therefore: 160.13168724279835390946502057613 x 3168 = 507297.185185 which is 1.185185 x 428032 and this is 227.5555555 x 1881

The first term of PWS is 384 {384 is twice 192} therefore: 227.555555 x 1.6875 = 384

The 1.6875 x 25920 = 43740 this is ten times 4374 the 25th term of PWS

If this is not adequate enough then: 1.6875 x 256 {FP component} = 432 otherwise 1.6875 x the FP = 1.7777777 and this x 10.6875 = 19

The 10.6875 is 1.6875 x 6.3333333 and this x 3 = 19

However, I have digressed somewhat from the initial number 19 therefore

{1} 19 x 91 = 1729 this plus 152 = 1881 and 152 x 40 = 6080

{2} 6080 + 1729 = 7809 and this minus 1881 = 5928 this is 19 x 312 the Maya Third Sun and 312 x 7.3333333 = 2288 the capstone perimeter

{3} 91 / 19 = 4.789473684210526315 a repeating 18 digits therefore 4.789473684210526315 x 6080 = 29120 this is 5280 x 5.515151 and this into 13 = 2.3571428571428 and this x 970.666666 = 2288 {capstone} the 970.666666 x 312 {Third Sun} = 302848 this is 29120 x 10.4 this x 584.615384615384 = 6080

The 584.615384615384 x 4.789473684210526315 = 2800

We know that 1 / 17 produces the 16 digit pattern: 0.0588235294117647, however within the digits is clearly seen 882, 294, 1176 and 1764

882 = City of God

1176 = only/begotten Son

1764 = a New Jerusalem unit {see john Michell's: The Dimensions of Paradise}, likewise 1764 x 100 = 176400, an area of a circle in Plato's Magnesia

Therefore we may employ 882, 294, 1176 or 1764, since 882 + 294 = 1176

The 294 = Church, otherwise 882 x 2 = 1764 and this minus 1176 = 588 this is 2 x 294

Therefore we utilise 882 {882 x 3.428571428571 = 3024}

Since: 882 / 0.0588235294117647 = 14994 this divided by 19 then multiplied by 6080 = 4798080 and this divided by 1764 = 2720 now this may be deemed 1000 x 2.72 Alexander Thom's so called Megalithic yard, yet in this instance we need to utilise the number 19 therefore 2720 x 19 = 51680 this divided by 6080 = 8.5 that multiplied by 216 = 1836 tother Grand Gallery unit.

Robert there are numerous combinations within the above I trust this sheds a glimmer of light re the number 19

Derek

The division of 616 by 666 produces: 0.924924, the division of 6080 by 1881 produces: 3.232323 this plus 0.924924 produces: 4.157248157248 within the digits may be observed the capstone 572 therefore: 4.157248157248 x 572 = 2377.945945 this x 666 = 1583712

Seeing as the 2377.945945 bears a resemblance to 2368 then: 1583712 / 2368 = 668.7972972 this x 666 = 445419, and 445 + 419 = 864. Alternatively the 0.924924 x 999 = 924 and this x 1.0909090 = 1008 that x 3 = 3024. Otherwise: 924 x 468 = 432432, the Great Pyramid unit: 756 x 572. As regards the mistranslation 666 or 616, I personally cannot call to mind this particular incidence; nonetheless this does not indicate its non-occurrence

Joe, for your assistance I have incorporated both your email addresses, I trust at least one receives this particular posting

Derek

From: URliforc2@aol.com [mailto:URliforc2@aol.com]

Sent: 27 June 2005 01:47

To: william.downie@btopenworld.com; d.skhane@ntlworld.com

Cc: Dee777@aol.com; susoni@sbcglobal.net; Wdestiny44@aol.com;
norma27@fastmail.fm; JMason4557@aol.com; greenlysard@gmail.com;
rgrace@aemail4u.com; CodeUFO@aol.com; K8AVL@webtv.net; jraso@videotron.ca;
c-miller@dircon.co.uk

Subject: Re: 666 v 616

I seem to recall seeing something about a mis-translation of that number in the bible to the effect that it was actially 616. Anyone?

Rita

Hello all

Attributable to a glitch {I deleted an email inadvertently} I would be appreciative if the member of the group {I assume it was Gary} could repost the email in question wherein the number 387 was declared, together with the unfamiliar evaluation of said 387, the subsequent may be of some assist.

{A} we know that 1/7 produces the repeating 0.142857142857 then: 142 + 857 = 999 this minus 387 = 612 this x 2 = 1224 {72 x 17, and 1224 minus 360 = 864} Gematria of 1224: God's creation, or else: divine circle, otherwise: the Lord God

{B} 612 x 3 = 1836 = Grand Gallery and 1836 is 1.5 x 1224

{C} the Suns Equatorial rotation period being approximately 26 days {26 = YHWH, and 26 x 88 = 2288 = capstone} the division of 360 by 26 obtains a repeating: 13.846153846153, likewise: 846 + 153 = 999, then 1836 minus 999 = 837 this + 387 = 1224

Likewise: 846153 minus 142857 = 703296 and 703 + 296 = 999, also within the 703296 is a rearranged 20736 this is twice 10368 the end term of PWS and a supposed cubit if Sir Isaac Newton being 2.0736

Therefore: 703296 / 20736 = 33.91666666 and this x 29.454545 = 999, the 29.454545 is 17.142857142857 x 1.7181818, the Egyptian cubit, {3024/1760} the Great Pyramid unit, likewise 17.142857142857 x 21 = 360

Alternatively the 29.454545 x 880 = 25920

The 29.454545 is also 25.714285714285 x 1.1454545 the Egyptian foot, the 25.714285714285 x 14 = 360, etc, etc

However returning to the 387 this is a rearranged 378 {756 / 2 = 378} therefore: 387 / 378 = 1.0238095238095 and this plus 1.7181818 = 2.7419913419913 and this x 65835 {35 x 1881} = 180519 then: 180 + 519 = 699 minus 387 = 312 the Maya Third Sun. likewise 312 x 7.333333 = 2288 the capstone and 2288 x 597.272727 = 1366560 the Maya "super" number, the 597.272727 divided by the Pyramid unit of 1.7181818 = 347.619047619047, there is a rearranged Sothic cycle of 1460 within the digits therefore: 1460 / 347.619047619047 = 4.2, then: 387 / 4.2 = 92.142857142857 and this x 7 = 645 minus 456 = 189 that x 2 = 378

Moreover a tablet from the Iraqi site of Fara dating from around 2650 BCE illustrates the following

"We have divided 1 granary of barley between a certain number of people, giving 7 sila to each one. These men were 164571 in number, and at the end of the distribution there were 3 sila remaining"

Now 164 + 571 = 735 that minus 387 = 348 minus 30 = 318, {348 + 318 = 666} the Gematria 318 being: Eliezer {Genesis XV: 2}

Likewise Genesis XIV: 20 states: "When Abraham heard that his brother was taken captive, he armed his servants, born in his own house, three hundred and eighteen"

See below for 348 since: 164571 minus 142857 = 21714 and 21 + 714 = 735 minus 387 = 348, likewise: 21 x 714 = 14994 and 14 + 994 = 1008 = 2.666666 x 378

Within the Epistle of Barnabas Abraham's victory over his enemies with the help of 318 circumcised men, Barnabas finds a reference to the cross and two the first letters of the name of Jesus

Since: T = 300 and IH = 10 + 8 therefore 300 + 10 + 8 = 318 {318 + 30 = 348 + 30 = 378}

The straightforward respond re: 387 is: 3 x 8 x 7 = 168 this x 18 = 3024 the Great Pyramid perimeter, then obviously 3024 is 8 x 378, likewise 378 + 9 = 387.Likewise 1881 {Grand Gallery} minus 387 = 1494 minus 378 = 1116 the first two words of the Torah: Bereshit Bara {"in the beginning [God] created"} total 1116, likewise Berosh Hashanah Nibra: "it was created at the beginning of the year" has the value 1116

The repeating numerals such as 142857 etc, warrant additional investigation given that there are a host {forgive the pun} of symbolic numbers within their associations

I trust this is of some benefit

Derek

**99.98.3 Scalars of 12 (Iuliano)**

From: JerryIuliano@aol.com

Sent: 27 June 2005

To: rgrace@aemail4u.com

Subject: Scalars of 12

MP:

The scalars of 12 comes from the electron volt ( -19 ) + electron mass ( - 31 ) and the log into the difference of gravitational ( -11 ).

(10^(((log(log(logG+12)))+12)/2))*ev/(c^2) = Me

G = gravitational constant 6.67420133 * ( 10 ^ - 11 )m^3 /kg/s^2......exact

ev = elementary charge = 1.60217653 * ( 10 ^ -19 )C.......exact

Me = electron mass = 9.1093826 * ( 10 ^ -31 )kg.......exact

c = speed of light = 299792458m/s....exact

...going in reverse...the electron mass times light speed squared, Einstein energy, divided the elementary unit, this determining the unit, log of this number times two minus twelve, determines the scale shrink...than a series of log, minus twelve, another scalar shrink, then log to the gravitational constant.... Gn ..... all logs are base 10

J.Iuliano

(http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/index.html) (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html) Constants Topics: _Values_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html) _Energy Equivalents_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/energy.html) _Searchable Bibliography_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/Citations/Search.html) _Background_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/background.html)

____________________________________

_Constants Bibliography_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html)

____________________________________

_Constants, Units & Uncertainty home page_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/index.html) Newtonian constant of gravitation Value 6.6742 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2 Standard uncertainty 0.0010 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2 Relative standard uncertainty 1.5 x 10-4 Concise form 6.6742(10) x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2 Click _here_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/CCValue?bg|ShowFirst=Browse) for correlation coefficient of this constant with other constants _Source: 2002 CODATA_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html) _ recommended values_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html) _Definition of uncertainty_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Info/Constants/definitions.html) _Correlation coefficient with any other constant_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/CCValue?bg|ShowFirst=Browse) (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html) Constants Topics: _Values_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html) _Energy Equivalents_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/energy.html) _Searchable Bibliography_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/Citations/Search.html) _Background_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/background.html) ____________________________________ _Constants Bibliography_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html)

____________________________________

_Constants, Units & Uncertainty home page_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/index.html) electron mass Value 9.109 3826 x 10-31 kg Standard uncertainty 0.000 0016 x 10-31 kg Relative standard uncertainty 1.7 x 10-7 Concise form 9.109 3826(16) x 10-31 kg Click _here_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/CCValue?me|ShowFirst=Browse) for correlation coefficient of this constant with other constants _Source: 2002 CODATA_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html) _ recommended values_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html) _Definition of uncertainty_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Info/Constants/definitions.html) _Correlation coefficient with any other constant_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/CCValue?me|ShowFirst=Browse) (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Results?search_for=electron+mass) or (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html) (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html) Constants Topics: _Values_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html) _Energy Equivalents_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/energy.html) _Searchable Bibliography_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/Citations/Search.html) _Background_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/background.html)

____________________________________

_Constants Bibliography_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html)

____________________________________

_Constants, Units & Uncertainty home page_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/index.html) elementary charge Value 1.602 176 53 x 10-19 C Standard uncertainty 0.000 000 14 x 10-19 C Relative standard uncertainty 8.5 x 10-8 Concise form 1.602 176 53(14) x 10-19 C Click _here_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/CCValue?e|ShowFirst=Browse) for correlation coefficient of this constant with other constants _Source: 2002 CODATA_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html) _ recommended values_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/bibliography.html) _Definition of uncertainty_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Info/Constants/definitions.html) _Correlation coefficient with any other constant_ (http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/CCValue?e|ShowFirst=Browse)

© Copyright. Robert Grace. 2005