99.49.1 The Kalen Universe (MetPhys) 

Page 49

Sections List- 99 Electrons and Mythologies
Impossible Correspondence Index

From: MetPhys@aol.com
Subject: The Kalen Universe
Date: 12/29/01

The Kalen Universe
A New Philosophy of Physics by Kalen J. Craig and Eugene A. Craig

To All,

I thought you might like to peruse a toroidal based universal theory which may add some insight to your already comprehensive views.

MetPhys@aol.com

_______________________________

99.49.2 Occult Chemistry/704/Anu (MetPhys) 

From: MetPhys@aol.com
Subject: Occult Chemistry/704/Anu
Date: 12/29/01

Occult Chemistry By Annie Besant (1847-1933) and C. W. Leadbeater (1847-1934)

Not only do these two clairvoyant investigators name the ultimate small unit building block the Anu but there is also mention of the number 704 (Section: THE NATURE OF MATTER 23, middle of the page), the very same number 704 relating to the pyramid of numbers found in files 99 Electrons and Mythologies.

The reason I'm interested in this word Anu is that it may be the root word of the familiar Anu-nnaki. If it is, then the Anunnaki may represent the smallest unit building block that we now call neutrinos or tachyons.

MetPhys@aol.com

_______________________________

99.49.3 Anu and the periodic table (Jerry Iuliano) 

From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com
Subject: Anu and the periodic table
Date: 12/30/01

MP:

The information you sent concerning the Theosophic meaning of the hydrogen atom and it's revelance to the pure number (18) (18 Anu's to the hydrogen unit ) is a mirror to the " identity" formula that I discovered several years ago that relates Moseley's ratio of X-ray frequencies to atomic number. All of the X-ray frequencies of the elements from the periodic table (an octonion form) can be generated starting with the "identity " element rubidium (37 at.n.) . The key to the formula is 18 Anu used as a constant in each X-ray frequency's derivation......." Rutherford was able to estimate the number of positive charges in the nucleus of a few elements, but there was no general procedure for determining the atomic numbers. In 1913 a young English physicist, Henry Moseley, was able to provide the necessary measurements. When high energy electrons were focused on a target made of elements under study , X-rays were generated . Moseley noticed that the frequency of X-rays emitted from the elements could be correlated by the equation:

sqrt v = a*(Z-b)

where v is the frequency of the emitted X-ray and a and b are constants that are the same for all the elements. Z equals the integer atomic number. A plot of sqrt v versus Z yields a straight line. Thus, from measured frequency and hence sqrt v of emitted X-rays, we can determine the atomic number of the element from the plot...." (from the book "CHEMISTRY:third edition...by Raymond Chang ..Random House ...p.265) .....[Henry Moseley (1887-1915) English physicist, Moseley discovered the relationship between X-ray spectra and the atomic number of the elements. A lieutenant in the Royal Engineers , he was killed in action at the age of 28 in a British campaign at Gallipol, Turkey.]

The "identity" formula creates this plot:

((Z-18)*.5)+ 8.5 = atomic number Z's sqrt v

the identity of frequency to atomic number occurs or begins at element 37 (Rb) Rubidium.

((37-18)*.5) + 8.5 =18 =a*(Z-b)

the constant of reduction (18) Anu equals the square of X-ray frequency

starting from element 12 Mg:

Mg (12)....((12-18)*.5)+8.5 = 5.5 = sqrt v = square root of frequency

Al (13)....((13-18)*.5)+ 8.5 = 6.0 = sqrt v

Si (14)....((14-18)*.5)+ 8.5 = 6.5 = sqrt v

P (15)....((15-18)*.5)+ 8.5 = 7.0 = sqrt v

continue until element Br = 35:

Br (35)....((35-18)*.5)+ 8.5 = 17 =sqrt v

Kr (36)....((36-18)*.5)+ 8.5 = 17.5 = sqrt v

Rb (37)....((37-18)*.5)+ 8.5 = 18 = identity to the Anu for hydrogen or the square of the X-ray frequency of the element Rubidium (Rb) is equal to the 18 Anu of the primitive hydrogen unit. In other words Rubidium is like a metallic hydrogen !!!?? It is in the same octonion group as hydrogen ,Group 1A .Rubidium is a very unstable element in earth conditions since it oxidizes in air and water combusting as a red flame. This formulation is new and different from Moseley's derivation:

comparison of the two forms:

MOSELEY: 1913

Z = ((sqrt v)/.5)+1

v = ((.5*Z)-.5)^2

IULIANO: 2001

Z = ((sqrt v -8.5)*.5)+ 18 Anu

v = (((Z-18 Anu)*.5)+ 8.5)^2

J.Iuliano

<< Periodic Law. Of all the diagrams stating the Periodic Law, we have found that of Sir William Crookes the simplest and the most descriptive of the facts observed. His reasons for a diagram depicting a pendulum swing were given by him in a lecture at the Royal Institution, London, on February 18, 1887 and published by him later. We use a slightly amended form of this pendulum diagram. The ultimate physical atom. All the elements are found to be built up from units called in the early editions the ultimate physical atom, and to which the name Anu has since been given. Weights. The weights given in the tables are all in terms of Hydrogen. We take Hydrogen-=18 Anu as our standard and equal to 1. The relation between our weights and that of the International Tables can be found by adjusting our weights to the standard of H=1.0078, >>

_______________________________

99.49.4 Happy New Year :-) (Wdestiny44) 

From: Wdestiny44@aol.com
Subject: Happy New Year :-)
Date: 01/01/02

Hi Everyone:

Just a note to tell you how grateful I AM that you all came into my life this year. The sharing you have done has enhanced my life more than you know. Thanks so much. Wishing you abundance, prosperity, good health and joy in all areas of your life this new year and always.

Peace and love,
Sharon 444
*Sharon Pacione*

_______________________________

99.49.5 ELTANIN ANTENNA = 144 (CodeUFO) 

From: CodeUFO@aol.com
Subject: ELTANIN ANTENNA = 144
Date: 01/01/02

Dear Mr. Cathie,

I suppose you probably receive a lot of email from people with a lot of strange ideas but I'm hoping you'll take the time to read through this as I would very much appreciate your input, comments, etc.

There are two items I'd like to focus on:

1. The Eltanin Antenna
2. Alphanumeric correlations to certain harmonics mentioned in your work.

ELTANIN ANTENNA:

Are you aware of the recent discovery by a fellow named Raphiem concerning the Eltanin Antenna and the number 144? (By the way, I found the alphanumeric value of the words ELTANIN ANTENNA = 144. Interesting "coincidence"? More on this in a moment.)

Raphiem's web site with all the meticulously detailed information has disappeared. It used to be Mission-Ignition.

His email address is (or at least was) raphiem@onebox.com. Perhaps he can still be reached and maybe he can send you the information in some sort of document form. In any case, here's the gist of what he found:

Using the antenna as the "zero point" (more on this nomenclature in a few minutes), Raphiem measured outward a radius of 144 miles creating a circle of 288 mile diameter. Then he noticed that there were quite a few EQ (Earthquake) monitoring stations located precisely along the perimeter of that circle. Then he measured outward another 144 miles from the first perimeter and found even more EQ stations located along this second circle. He kept increasing the size of the circles by 144 miles and each new circle contained not only EQ stations along the perimeter but also military bases and a few airports as well. In all, there were what appeared to be literally hundreds of EQ stations combined with the military bases and airports. A very interesting phenomenon, wouldn't you agree? And here's something else of interest:

I did some research on the word "Eltanin". _ This gets REALLY interesting! In addition to your work which ties the harmonic 144 to light, there is some thought that the number 144 is related to light via gematria. While some have said it is from the Hebrew system of gematria, I have come to doubt that since I can find no reference to support it. However, another school of thought is that is comes from some Druid form of gematria. I have not yet researched that for verification. Nevertheless, your work is sufficient as a source for this 144:Light relationship.

Ok, now... I recognized the "el" (from EL-tanin) as ancient Hebrew for "god" or "god-like" or "pertaining to god", etc. Looking at "tanin" I thought it also had a "Hebrew" ring to it. So I contacted a rabbi who told me "tanin" was an old Hebrew word meaning "very large fish". Another source found the meaning of the full word "eltanin" as Arabic for "serpent". Very large fish? Serpent? Antenna under water? Watch as this unfolds...

Remember the news article about the "asteroid" that crashed into the sea two million years ago? (I've pasted the article below) Well, what if...what if... it wasn't an asteroid? What if...what if... the "antenna" sticking out of the sea bed is just the visible part of a huge space craft (or some other type of apparatus) that plunged into the sea and is now buried under the sea bed? Certainly if...if...this is the case, we can see a possible connection to the "fish" and the "serpent" and the "el".... as in "great fish/serpent from God" or "from the Heavens". You see what I'm getting at. But wait, there's more...

Eltanin (as you may already know) is a star, Gamma Draconis. It turns out that the distance of this star from the earth has been calculated at about 147 light years from earth. Notice how close that is to 144. Perhaps it's really 144 light years? Curious coincidence, is it not, that according to your work, 144 has a harmonic correlation to "Light"? And then there's the "coincidence" that, using standard english alphanumeric values (my area of research: Synchroni City), ELTANIN ANTENNA=144. And then there's this...

The Eltanin star is also known as the "Zenith Star" because it moves through the zenith at the latitude of the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, England. Now this fact ties in directly with Michael Morton's work with the "code matrix" of Carl Munck, since Munck's discovery of note was that the ancient sites on the earth are all positioned in accordance with a latitude/longitude system whereby the Prime Meridian was, in ancient times, located dead center of the Great Pyramid! And yet there is more!

Even before we were aware of the article about the asteroid, Michael had begun work on the Eltanin Antenna to see how it fit into the "Code Matrix", or, as he calls it, the Archaeo-Sky Matrix (or ASM). I could show you the figures, but suffice to say for the moment that he discovered the "antenna" corresponds, in terms of lat/long points, with the star "Sirius" (as of midnight, Jan.1, 2000). Now why is this interesting? Because as I later noticed in the article... well, let me quote directly from the article:

<< But the collision of Eltanin may also offer scientists a way to explain what's been dubbed the 'Sirius enigma' - the puzzle of why marine fossils have been found in the Transantarctic Mountains, well above sea level. >>

Notice what is not explained here is WHY they dubbed it the "Sirius Enigma"??? What connection could they have known about? There must have been some reason for them to call it the "Sirius Enigma". Is this not a mystery requiring some investigation?

I decided to go ahead and toss in Michael Morton's Archaeo-sky Matrix calculations anyway. If you're not familiar with the work of Carl Munck and with Morton's expansion of that "code" into what he calls the Archaeo-Sky Matrix then maybe this won't make much sense. But just in case you are familiar with how it works, you'll find this interesting.

Michael wrote:

_______________________________

Hello, All ...

I just now found the "ASM" (Archaeo-sky Matrix) figures for this_Eltanin Antenna_placement !!

Refer (above) to Raphiem's figures for its lat/long.

Look what I just now came up with .. its obvious "ASM" placement ..

Grid LAT ..
59 (deg) X 09 (min) X 17.98360939 (sec) South .. = 9549.296586 South.

Grid LONG ..
136 (deg) X 07 (min) X 24.88135563 (sec) W.Giza .. = 23687.05056 W.Giza.
[ W.Greenwich 104 deg 59 min 24.08135563 sec ].

Grid POINT Value Eltanin Antenna ..
23687.05056 / 9549.296586 = 2.480502134

Notice .. "2.480502134" .. decimal harmonic of the
Grid POINT Value of .. The Great Pyramid of Giza !!! { 248.0502134 ... Munck, 1992, "The Code" }.

"23687.05056" .. decimal harmonic of .. the Jan.1, 2000
Grid POINT Value of .. SIRIUS !!! { 2.368705056 ... Morton, 1999, Internet }.

Not_only_do you have the SIRIUS Grid POINT Value decimal harmonic for Jan.1, 2000 .. you_also_have .. the SIRIUS Grid LONG (decimal harmonic) for Jan.1, 2000 !!!! { 24805.02134 E.ALNITAK .. Morton, 1999, Internet }.

"9549.296586" .. equivalent to .. (30000 / Pi).

Please refer to my Part 1 article .. "Sky Matrix" .. at .. http://mission-ignition.tripod.com/matrix/

-- Michael Lawrence Morton (c) 2001

_______________________________

ALPHANUMERICS:
Now this is where I hope you'll hang in there with me and not get turned off by the notion of alphanumerics. I know it has a rather unfortunate connotation because of its close relationship to what is generally called numerology. But something different is happening here and it appears as if it might have some relevance to your own work.

Just in case you might well be thinking this can't possibly be, let me give you a teaser, in the form of a brief introduction, which I hope will entice you to continue reading:

You know the reduced value of 144 is 9 (1+4+4=9), right? Here are some interesting alphanumeric correlations that I suspect might be more than just "coincidence". The system used here is the very simple formula of A=1, B=2, C=3, etc.

THE SECRET KEY = 144
NINE IS THE KEY = 144
THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS THE KEY = 261
LIGHT SPEED = 126
NINE IS LIGHT = 126
ONE + TWO + SIX = 144

How might this be happening? It may have to do with an admittedly strange idea: that the modern English alphabet is somehow "encoded" and can be used as a cipher, of sorts, to reveal "hidden" information pertaining to certain phenomena; in particular, phenomena dealing with light, communication, geometry, the Great Pyramid, synchronicity, and spiritual archetypes. Notice:

THE ALPHANUMBER = 144
THE ALPHABET NUMBER = 171 = THE ZERO POINT = POSITIVE + LIGHT = THE LIGHT HARMONIC

The difference between these two numbers (171 and 144) is 27, which you'll recognize as a key number in terms of your grid hours scheme. Also I've found the number 27 "encoded" within the structure of the English alphabet. It is found by folding the alphabet in half, so A meets Z; B meets Y; and so on. This forms 13 pairs of letters. The alphanumeric value of each pair is 27.

Since many words and phrases, which may have no relationship to one another, can be found to have matching numbers, the key is to confine the work to what I call "case related" words and phrases. This narrows the parameters of the playing field, as it were, and allows only related concepts into the picture. The result is like having the pieces of a picture puzzle scattered across the table and the goal is to examine each of the pieces and try to find how they interconnect to form the bigger picture. Hopefully, I've succeeded in holding your attention to this point, so I'll now present an item which will be referred to several times in the text to follow. This item is what I call the AlphaNumber Table.

The AlphaNumber Table shows the word forms of the numbers 0 thru 9, i.e., ZERO, ONE, TWO, THREE, etc. and the alphanumeric values of each. This Table breaks down into 3 sets, each set defined by the number of letters in each word (The word, ZERO, seems not to belong with the sets but exists as a kind of "key" set aside for certain applications)

3-Letter Set: ONE(34) + TWO(58) + SIX(52) = 144
4-Letter Set: FOUR(60) + FIVE(42) + NINE(42) = 144
5-Letter Set: THREE(56) + SEVEN(65) + EIGHT(49) = 170

Two of the sets each have an alphanumeric sum of 144, thus "double light" right there in the Table. I've only recently begun to understand any significance regarding the third set which has a total alphanumeric value of 170. (Just recently discovered two clues: THE LIGHT SOURCE=170 and ONE SEVENTY = 144. I noticed the alphabet connection is "encoded" here as "26", the number of letters in the alphabet: 170 - 144 = 26 ) It appears that the "ZERO" is mostly applicable to this third set. This will be addressed later in the text. More detailed information regarding this Table and the breakdown of the "sets" within the Table can be found at my web site:

Synchroni City. Here is the Table in a form that will suffice for this email post:

_______________________________

ALPHANUMBER TABLE:

(The numbers in parentheses are the reduced values to a single digit)

ZERO=64 (1).......................Stand Alone
ONE=34 (7).............3-letter set
TWO=58 (4)............3-letter set
THREE=56 (2)..................5-letter set
FOUR=60 (6)..........4-letter set
FIVE=42 (6)...........4-letter set
SIX=52 (7)..............3-letter set
SEVEN=65 (2)..................5-letter set
EIGHT=49 (4)...................5-letter set
NINE=42 (6)...........4-letter set

Eltanin

Okay, here it is, beginning with the Eltanin Antenna as "The Zero Point"....

_______________________________

THE ZERO POINT=171
COMMUNICATION DEVICE = 198
198-171 = 27

Note: In Cathie's scheme of grid hours, 27 of these hours = 1 revolution of the Earth.

_______________________________

TWENTY SEVEN IS THE GEOMETRIC NUMBER OF THE ENGLISH ALPHABET = 594

Note: I have been considering that my AlphaNumber Table is somehow representative of a circle in some way. With that in mind, the following is interesting, to say the least:

ENGLISH ALPHABET CIRCLE = 189
Now take the 594 and divide it by the 189:
594/189 = 3.142857143, essentially Pi (variance: 0.001264489)

Note: Referring back to the value 27 we find:
27 x 22 = 594
27 x 7 = 189
22/7 = 3.142857143

27 + 22 = 49 = EIGHT
27 + 7 = 34 = ONE
Notice, HARMONIC = 81 = SOURCE

_______________________________

HALF = 27 = CODE

The concept of "half" and "double" and "2" seem intertwined in all of this work I've been doing for the past few years. Recall my recent post regarding the concept of "Mind-2" for example. Here is another example:

THE ZERO POINT = 171
ELTANIN ANTENNA = 144
(Note: ONE SEVENTY ONE and ONE FORTY FOUR share the same value of 178)

-----------171+144 = 315
-----------171-144 = 27
315 - 27 = 288, or "double" light (144x2)

(2 x 27 = 54 = VOICE = TONE, which fits into this discussion on "communication". There's more on this but it would add too much to this brief paper, so I'll skip it for now.)

HALF = 27
Half of 27 is 13.5 or the harmonic 135 (More on 135 connection to Eltanin below)
COMMUNICATE + COMMUNICATION DEVICE = 315
315 - 135 = 180, or "half" circle (360/2)

ONE EIGHTY = 108
THREE SIXTY = 153
108 + 153 = 261 = THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS THE KEY
153 + 135 = 288, double light

THE ZERO POINT = 171
288 = 144 x 2 or "double light".
Subtract The Zero Point number from the "double light" number:
288 - 171 = 117 = COMMUNICATE

_______________________________

Now catch this:

COMMUNICATE + COMMUNICATION DEVICE = 315
315 = ELTANIN ANTENNA + THE ZERO POINT !!!

_______________________________

Besides 288 referring to double light, we might also think about the idea of a double Eltanin Antenna, given that Michael has found the "Siberian" reciprocal location_of_the "Eltanin Antenna" (is there a second antenna in Siberia?) has a direct ASM correlation with the gigantic Milk Hill crop glyph of August, 2001.

Michael wrote:

The "Siberian" reciprocal location_of_the "Eltanin Antenna" is "180 arc-degrees on the other side of Earth .. in terms of_both_latitude and longitude .. but_using_the GIZA prime meridian" (Morton, 2001).

_______________________________

As noted previously:

HALF = 27
Half of 27 is 13.5 or the harmonic 135
315 - 135 = 180, or "half" circle (360/2)

Note: 135 is a harmonic of 13500. The Eltanin Antenna is located 13,500 ft. below sea level. Bruce Cathie notes that the six crossbars on the antenna appear to be positioned at 15 degree angles to one another. Notice, 135/15 = 9. As we know from my previous work, NINE IS THE KEY = 144.

Now note:
180 + 144 = 324
324 = RIGHT BRAIN + CIRCLE + LEFT BRAIN + SQUARE

_______________________________

The AlphaNumber Table:

Here's a possible explanation for why the English alphanumerics tend to work so well with regard to so many esoteric subjects not the least of which is this phenomenon of the Eltanin Antenna and the Crop Glyphs. It's a wild and completely bizarre notion but the possibility exists that what I've developed and designated as the AlphaNumber Table may be a cipher, of sorts, which helps decode otherwise encoded information or at least functions as a key, of sorts, helping to unlock some of the mysteries pertaining to certain phenomena.

Some of you may recall my posts regarding the AlphaNumber Table, i.e., the word forms of the numbers 0 thru 9, i.e., ZERO, ONE, TWO, THREE, etc. and the alphanumeric values of each. This Table breaks down into 3 sets, each set defined by the number of letters in each word (The word, ZERO, appears not to belong with the sets but exists as a kind of "key" set aside for certain applications). Two of the sets each have an alphanumeric sum of 144, thus "double light" right there in the Table. I've only recently begun to understand any significance regarding the third set which has a total alphanumeric value of 170. (Just recently discovered THE LIGHT SOURCE=170) It appears that the "ZERO" is mostly applicable to this third set. In our case, here, we can see how it works with the numbers we are currently exploring:

Using the convention of reducing multidigit numbers to single digits by cross-adding:

ZERO = 64 = 10 = 1 (6+4=10, then 1+0=1)
Add the reduced value of ZERO (i.e., 1) to 170 and we have:
170 + 1 = 171 = THE ZERO POINT !!!

Furthermore, using the full value 64:
170 + 64 = 234 (which, by the way is the AlphaNumeric Value of "THE GREAT PYRAMID OF GIZA")
Recall from above: 324 = RIGHT BRAIN + CIRCLE + LEFT BRAIN + SQUARE
324 - 234 = 90, "half" of 180 which is "half" of 360, a full circle in arc degrees.

Recall HALF = 27 = CODE
27 + 90 = 117 = COMMUNICATE !!!

Note: Bruce Cathie points out that there are 6 crossbars on the Eltanin Antenna and that they each appear to be situated at 15 degrees to each other. Notice this:
15 x 6 = 90, which is half 180, which is half 360.

An interesting aside here is:
117 = NEGATIVE+DARK and 171 = POSITIVE+LIGHT, and the two combined are 288, (117+171=288) or 144 x 2, or double light.

More:
117 = SPIRAL + NINE
171 = THE SPIRAL OF NINE

_______________________________

The third set in the AlphaTable, I spoke of earlier, is comprised of these words or "AlphaNumbers" as I call them:
THREE, SEVEN, EIGHT

Notice:
3 + 7 + 8 = 18
18 squared = 324 = RIGHT BRAIN + CIRCLE + LEFT BRAIN + SQUARE

_______________________________

Now to tie the crop glyphs into all of this:

Recall from a previous post:
MIND SQUARED = 99 = THOUGHT

Recall from above:
THE ZERO POINT=171

Now, what is suggested here? Perhaps some sort of mind/thought transmission using the Eltanin Antenna to generate communication via the crop glyphs? Hmm....? Let's see what the alphanumerics might suggest:

THE ZERO POINT + MIND SQUARED (or THOUGHT) = 270, decimal harmonic of 27 and...
270 = CROP GLYPH COMMUNICATION !!!
Is this all just "coincidence"?

CROP GLYPH = 120 = THE MIND OF GOD
120 squared = 14400, harmonic 144

MIND = 40
14400/40 = 360 = THE TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL

The phrase, MIND SQUARED, (or the word, THOUGHT) = 99
14400 + 99 = 14499
1+4+4+9+9 = 27, decimal harmonic of 270 = CROP GLYPH COMMUNICATION !!!
Double "Thought" is 99 x 2 = 198 = COMMUNICATION DEVICE !!!

_______________________________

Now, recall Dr. Leavengood has found, through lab analysis of crops taken from inside the crop glyphs, that the crops exhibit evidence of microwave activity. Is the Eltanin Antenna generating, or in some way controlling, microwave transmissions? And last night on Art Bell's program, noted crop circle researcher, Michael Glickman, suggested the formation of the glyphs may have something to do with thought transference and matter manipulation. This was my premise in my previous paper on the "Mind-2" concept. Now, notice this:

MICROWAVE GENERATOR = 212 = THOUGHT PATTERNS !!!

Whew! Okay, let's continue...

COMMUNICATION DEVICE + ELTANIN ANTENNA = 342
RIGHT BRAIN + CIRCLE + LEFT BRAIN + SQUARE = 324
342 + 324 = 666

666 - 144 = 522, the sum total of the alphanumeric values of ZERO thru NINE and the reverse of 2.25 or the harmonic 225. I'll end this paper here and in so doing it seems most appropriate (keep in mind the 2.25) to attach one of Michael's most recent posts concerning the Eltanin Antenna and Gamma Draconis. It just adds more fuel to the pyre:

_______________________________

August 27 (Ha! great number!), 2001, Michael Morton wrote:

Here are my "ASM" figures for Jan.1, 2000 GAMMA DRACONIS;

Grid LAT ..
74 (deg) X 55 (min) X 15.03782235 (sec) North of ecliptic .. = 61203.93696 North of ecliptic.

Grid LONG ..
176 (deg) X 44 (min) X 28.98121716 (sec) W.ALNITAK .. = 224430.5457 W.ALNITAK.

Grid POINT Value for Jan.1, 2000 GAMMA DRACONIS ..
224430.5457 / 61203.93696 = 3.666929888

_______________________________

Recall, if you will .. my Grid POINT Value for the "Eltanin Antenna", planted on the ocean-floor .. SW of the tip of South America .. 2.480502134

Notice this equation, please ..

(3.666929888 / 2.480502134) = (8.25059225 / 2.480502134) / 2.25

2.25 .. is the Grid POINT Value I found .. for the_center_of the *magnificent* "Milk Hill" crop formation (UK) of earlier in August, 2001. And .. 8.25059225 .. is the "northern reciprocal" Grid POINT Value that I found for the "Siberian" reciprocal location_of_the "Eltanin Antenna" .. 180 arc-degrees on the other side of Earth .. in terms of_both_latitude and longitude .. but_using_the GIZA prime meridian !!!

In fact .. in the above equation .. the "Eltanin Antenna" Grid POINT Value "cancels out" .. leaving the following ..

8.25059225 / 3.666929888 = 2.25

2001, Michael Morton

Re: Part 1 article .. "Sky Matrix" .. by M.L.Morton at .. Sky Matrix

_______________________________

Alphanumerics Suggest Eltanin Antenna is Communication Device with Correlations to Crop Glyphs!

2001, Gary Val Tenuta - except for segments by Michael Lawrence Morton.

_______________________________

99.49.6 (111 121 131 141 151 161 171 181 191 and ELTANIN ANTENNA=144) (CodeUFO) 

From: CodeUFO@aol.com
Subject: (111 121 131 141 151 161 171 181 191 and ELTANIN ANTENNA=144)
Date: 12/29/01

Hello all,

I just sent out an email post with the subject, ELTANIN ANTENNA=144. It was addressed to Bruce Cathie, but I sent blind copies to the rest of you. Most of you probably recognize most of what was in that post as much of it was a copy of an email I'd sent out a few weeks ago. But new bits of information were added. That's why I sent copies to y'all on this list, just in case someone might want to see the new stuff.

One thing that didn't get into that post is the following. I thought it was kind of interesting. I'd been considering an intuitive notion (strange as it seems) about a connection between the English alphabet and the "concept" of a pyramid. So I decided to combine the two alphanumerically and here's what turned up:

ALPHABET + PYRAMID = 151

Now we know from previous work that the number 151 has some really interesting correlations:

151 =
JESUS CHRIST
ISIS PENTAGRAM
SOUTH OF FRANCE
RENNES LE CHATEAU
INTERSECTION

It's always been the "INTERSECTION" correlation that has captured my attention for some reason. I think maybe it's because the discovery of this number came out of a discussion with Michael way back when he was analyzing the Phoenix Lights event from March of 1997. Michael noted that the hover point for the Phoenix UFO was at the intersection of Indian School Road and Seventh Avenue. At that time I figured the alphanumerics and found:

INDIAN SCHOOL ROAD = 161 = SEVENTH AVENUE

Somehow, about the same time I found the 151 stuff and we began exploring this particular pattern of numbers: 111, 121, 131, etc. through 191. Well, anyway, the other day I was looking at the ALPHABET + PYRAMID = 151 and, just having been reading through some of Bruce Cathie's books I had the idea of "pyramid" and "zero point" now in the back of my mind; the Great Pyramid being a kind of "zero point" intersection, as it were, for the "Code" (Munck, Morton).

Just for the heck of it, since 9 is so key to all of this stuff, I decided to multiply:
151 x 9 = 1359

It turns out that this product is the same as the sum of:
111+121+131+141+151+161+171+181+191 = 1359

I thought it was interesting but didn't know really what to make of it. I did notice, however, that 151 is, of course, the middle of the series... sort of an INTERSECTION or Center Point:

CENTER POINT = 171 = THE ZERO POINT

I then noticed that 171 is the center point between 151 and 191:
111...121...131...141...{151...161...*171*...181...191 }

Earlier I had found:

THE SOURCE OF LIGHT = 191

151 + 191 = 342

I decided to reverse and add:
342 + 243 = 585

Then I put in the remaining 171:
585+171 = 756, the base width of the Great Pyramid measured in feet.

Seeing as how 171 was the center point between 151 and 191, I decided to see what was on either side of that center point:

{151...161...***...181...191 }
151 + 161 = 312
181 + 191 = 372
312 + 372 = 684

The number 684 rang a bell and I remembered Bruce Cathie had found a similar number, 648, as the total harmonic value of the atomic numbers of the combined elements (argon(18), crypton(36), xenon(54), hafnium(72), thorium(90), and three other yet to be discovered elements: (108), (126), and (144) ). So I decided to combine Cathie's number with my 684:

684 + 648 = 1332
1332 rang a bell, and I realized it's twice 666. Now check this out:

ARGON + CRYPTON + XENON + HAFNIUM + THORIUM = 414

Of course I immediately recognized that "dot-dash-dot" pattern in the number. Obviously it wasn't one of those in the series in which each number begins and ends with 1 (e.g., 151, 161, etc.). So I went back and picked up that dot-dash-dot number I had found earlier, 585, and put the two together:

414 + 585 = 999, the inverse of 666.

Then I decided to add those:
666 + 999 = 1665

Going back and picking up 1359
(111+121+131+141+151+161+171+181+191 = 1359)

I added it to this 1665:
1665 + 1359 = 3024

I recognized this (minus the zero) as similar to the 342 from 151+191=342. So I decided to combine them:
324 + 342 = 666

Since 666 and 999 were at play here, I combined their alphanumeric values:
SIX SIX SIX = 156
NINE NINE NINE = 126
156 + 126 = 282, another "dot-dash-dot" number.

I noticed 282 could be split in two, so I divided it:
282/2 = 141, the center point between 111 and 171:
111...121...131...*141*...151...161...171

So I ran the same procedure of finding the sums of the numbers on either side of 141:
111+121+131 = 363
151+161+171 = 483
363 + 483 = 846

I recognized this as yet another configuration of Cathie's 648. In fact it's the exact mirror of 648. So, like before, I added Cathie's number to it:
846 + 648 = 1494

And, again as before, I divided this result in half:
1494/2 = 747, another "dot-dash-dot" number.

I went back and picked up the 585 from way back toward the beginning and added it:
747 + 585 = 1332, the same as 684 + 648 = 1332 = 666 x 2

I have no idea what any of this means but... hey, what the hell, it keeps me off the streets.

-Gary-

_______________________________

99.49.7 (111 121 131 141 151 161 171 181 191) (MetPhys) 

From: MetPhys@aol.com
Subject: (111 121 131 141 151 161 171 181 191)
Date: 01/01/02

Gary: "I have no idea what any of this means..."

MetPhys: I would say the dash-dot-dash(dot=expanded 0) pattern is another way of saying +0-

Perhaps the dash-dot-dash number series can't be understood until we begin to see the completely rational underlying pattern of the computer program of universe, generating from the 9 permutations of the centers (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9), computer bits (1's) to each side of center:

Numbers in columns:

111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181191
111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181191
111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181191
111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181191
111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181191
111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181191
111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181191
111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181191
111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181191

OR...

Numbers in diagonal, staggered fashion like unto the diagonal of triple squares or Pascal triangles or a binary progression (2):

911111211311411511611711811911111211311411511611711811
119111112113114115116117118119111112113114115116117118
181191111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171
711811911111211311411511611711811911111211311411511611
117118119111112113114115116117118119111112113114115116
6117118119111112113114115116117118119111112113114115
116117118119111112113114115116117118119111112113114
15116117118119111112113114115116117118119111112113
4115116117118119111112113114115116117118119111112
11411511611711811911111211311411511611711811911
1311411511611711811911111211311411511611711811

MetPhys@aol.com

_______________________________

99.49.8 (111 121 131 141 151 161 171 181 191) (MetPhys) 

From: MetPhys@aol.com
Subject: 111 121 131 141 151 161 171 181 191
Date: 01/01/02

Offset by 3 (torah code):

11211311411511611711811911112113114115116117118119111112
1131141151161171181191111211311411511611711811911111211
1141151161171181191111211311411511611711811911111211311
1151161171181191111211311411511611711811911111211311411
1161171181191111211311411511611711811911111211311411511
1171181191111211311411511611711811911111211311411511611
1181191111211311411511611711811911111211311411511611
11911112113114115116117118119111112113114115116
111121131141151161171181191111121131141151

Offset by 4 (Platonic):

11112113114115116117118119111112113114115116117118119111
1191111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181
7118119111112113114115116117118119111112113114115116117
1611711811911111211311411511611711811911111211311411511
1151161171181191111121131141151161171181191111121131141
3114115116117118119111112113114115116117118119111112113
1211311411511611711811911111211311411511611711811911111
1111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181191
8119111112113114115116117118119111112113114115116117118
1711811911111211311411511611711811911111211311411511611
51161171181191111211311411511611711811911

MetPhys@aol.com

_______________________________

99.49.9 Enneagram (Tombuoyed) 

From: Tombuoyed@aol.com
Subject: Enneagram
Date: 01/01/02

Robert,

I know David Eyes from the Steiner Internet. Here is his intriguing take on the enneagram.

David Eyes Enneagram

Tom

_______________________________

99.49.10 Tzolkin and (111 121 131 141 151 161 171 181 191) (MetPhys) 

From: MetPhys@aol.com
Subject: Tzolkin and 111 121 131 141 151 161 171 181 191
Date: 01/03/02

THE TZOLKIN-ALPHABET AND SERIES 111-191

After assembling the 4 permutations of the number series 111 212 313 414 515 616 717 818 919 found by Gary Val Tenuta, I referenced his Mayan Tzolkin Alphanumerics Page wherein the Mayan Tzolkin grid of 13 x 20 numbers are replaced by the alphabet A-Z.

Within this alphabetic arrangement there appears the word "KEY" in several places in the customary diagonal arrangement. Knowing that the Tzolkin should be folded left to right, top to bottom, it then becomes a torus, ever recursive, with the stylized cadeusus shape rotating thru the center column 7, the never changing center of consciousness.

COMPARING ALPHABET AND PYRAMID

Gary sent Mail 99.49.6 about his quote: "a connection between the English alphabet and the "concept" of a pyramid. So (Gary) decided to combine the two alphanumerically and here's what turned up":

ALPHABET + PYRAMID = 151

MAKING THE SERIES 111-191 FIT IN THE TZOLKIN.

The purpose of this exercise is to note which of the 111-191 series numbers falls upon the Alphabet letters designated "KEY".

After Gary found so many unique series 111-191, I began to think about this string of numbers 111-191 in two responses: Mail 99.49.7 and 99.49.8. Noticing that the offset of Gary's Tzolkin Alphabet was 4 units horizontally and 2 units vertically between each "K" in "KEY", the same as the Platonic 4 offset of email 99.49.8, I compared the 111-191 series with Gary's Tzolkin Alphabet transmutation and noticed that there were twice as many Tzolkin rows (20) than needed if I were to superimpose the series 111-191 upon the Tzolkin.

The Problem:

1. Use 1 row from 111 to 191- 111121131141151161171181191 = 27 numbers.
2. Use 2 rows doubled- 111121131141151161171181191111121131141151161171181191 = 54 numbers.

The Conclusion: If the series 111-191 was to fit within the Tzolkin, each series 111-191 had to occupy 2 lines per Tzolkin rows (20), or doubled:

111121131141151161171181191 = 27 forward numbers.
111121131141151161171181191 = 27 forward numbers.

or, first, 1 should be reversed after the manner of the A to Z, B to Y series of the English alphabet:

111121131141151161171181191 = 27 forward numbers.
191181171161151141131121111 = 27 reversed numbers.

Elsewhere I learned this doubling accounted for the 4pi intrinsic spin of electrons and is otherwise known as the "other side" of "this side", therefore the doubling seemed a valid move. Having settled the (20) row problem and the (13) column problem , I was now left with the mere mechanics of squeezing 27 numbers into a grid of 13 x 20, repetitively.

THE LOGICAL PROCEDURE

I choose first, to not double or reverse the series.
This forced a grid with 27 column numbers by 20 rows as follows:

111121131141151161171181191
119111112113114115116117118
711811911111211311411511611
161171181191111121131141151
115116117118119111112113114
311411511611711811911111211
121131141151161171181191111
111112113114115116117118119
811911111211311411511611711
171181191111121131141151161
116117118119111121131141151
411511611711811911111211311
131141151161171181191111121
112113114115116117118119111
911112113111411511611711811
118119111121131141151161171
611711811911112113114115116
511611711811911112113114115
141151161171181191111121131
211311415116117118119111112

The Maddening Decisions:

Now we have the problem of 27 numbers fitting 13 columns. Can't happen. There's 1 extra number.
Now you know why the Jesuit Priests in China went mad when encountering this in the I Ching.
Therefore, to avoid madness we will designate the 14th column, the center (bold above).
This leaves us with 13 numbers on each side of the center so the Tzolkin series does not include the center column now.
This still leaves us with 27 numbers fitting into 13 columns.
There is no other choice.

More Maddening Decisions:

Do we choose the first number from the left series plus the first number from the right series?
Do we choose the first 2 numbers from the left series in succession?
Its the old question: 1 from column A and 1 from column B?

The Left Set:

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

3K

1E

1Y

4S

1

1

1

1

9

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

3

1

7

1

1

8K

1E

1Y

9S

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

6

1

1

7

1

1

8

1

1

9

1

1

1

1

5

1

1

6

1

1

7

1

1

8

1

3

1

1

4

1

1

5

1

1

6

1

1

7

1

2

1

1

3

1

1

4

1K

1E

5Y

1S

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

3

1

1

4

1

8

1

1

9

1K

1E

1Y

1S

1

2

1

1

3

1

7

1

1

8

1

1

9

1

1

1

1

1

1K

1E

6Y

1S

1

7

1

1

8

1

1

9

1

4

1

1

5

1

1

6

1

1

7

1

1

8

1

3

1

1

4

1

1

5

1

1K

6E

1Y

1S

1

1

2

1

1

3

1

1

4

1

1

5

1

9

1

1

1

1

1K

2E

1Y

1S

3

1

1

4

1

1

8

1

1

9

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

6K

1E

1Y

7S

1

1

8

1

1

9

1

1

1

5

1

1

6

1

1

7

1

1

8

1

1

9

1

4

1

1

5

1

1

6

1

1K

7E

1Y

1S

2

1

1

3

1

1

4

1

1

5

1

1

6


The Right Set:

1

1

6

1

1

7

1

1K

8E

1Y

1S

9

1

4

1

1

5

1

1

6

1

1

7

1

1

8

1

3

1

1K

4E

1Y

1S

5

1

1

6

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

3

1

1

4

1

1

5

1

9

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

3

1

1

4

1

8

1

1

9

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

7

1

1

8

1

1

9K

1E

1Y

1S

1

5

1

1

6

1

1

7

1

1

8

1

1

9

1

4

1

1

5K

1E

1Y

6S

1

1

7

1

1

1

1

3

1

1

4

1

1

5

1

1

6

1

1K

1E

2Y

1S

1

3

1

1

4

1

1

5

1

1

9

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

3

1

1

1

1

8

1

1

9

1

1

1

1K

1E

2Y

1S

6

1

1

7

1

1

8

1

1

9

1

1

1

1

5

1

1

6

1K

1E

7Y

1S

1

8

1

1

1

1

4

1

1

5

1

1

6

1

1

7

1

2

1K

1E

3Y

1S

1

4

1

1

5

1

1

6

1

1

1

2

1

1

3

1

1

4

1

1

5

1S

1

9

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1K

3E

1Y

7

1

1

8

1

1

9

1

1

1

1

1

2


MetPhys@aol.com

_______________________________

99.49.11 Pi Code (ald902r@hotmail.com) 

From: ald902r@hotmail.com
Subject: Pi Code
Date: 01/07/02

This one ought to tweak you also....This site has way toooo much stuff in it.

The Pi Code

The section with the "alph-omega-god" & "satan-demon" is pretty trippy!

_______________________________

99.49.12 Conjectures: Tetrahedrons, Star of David, 19.5 degrees (MetPhys) 

From: MetPhys@aol.com
Subject: Conjectures: Tetrahedrons, Star of David, 19.5 degrees
Date: 01/09/02
Sent To: JerryIuliano, TomBuoyed, Milamo, Code UFO, ancient_vizier@yahoo.com, dle33@swbell.net, neil@neilfreer.com, Wdestiny44, Dee777, JMason4557, ald902r@hotmail.com, maryweav@hotmail.com

Tetrahedrons, Star of David, 19.5 degrees

To All,

Could I have a mathematical critique of the analysis of the Hoagland relationships of the tetrahedron and the (Correction: 19.5 not 120 degrees) that is said to be the apex "touch points" within a sphere. There seems to be some valid conjecture raised here and we all would appreciate your very intelligent input if you wish to comment.

I do know, if you want to understand the Star of David, that within a transparent "octahedron" made up of 2 Giza pyramidals of side angle 51'51"14.3s, base to base, when this upright octahedron (8 sided) is rotated 45 degrees toward the viewer, and 45 degrees left or right off its edge line, one will see a Star of David within, as the edge lines cross each other. This is probably the correct context for observing the "Star" as this Giza octahedral "crystal" is found in all perfectly conducting metals.

MetPhys@aol.com

_______________________________

99.49.13 Re: Conjectures: Tetrahedrons, Star of David, 19.5 degrees (ancient_vizier@yahoo.com) 

From: ancient_vizier@yahoo.com (Chronos)
Subject: Conjectures: Tetrahedrons, Star of David, 19.5 degrees
Date: 01/10/02

I have no very intelligent input personally. Having no "textbook formulas" for much that concerns the Platonic solids, I am still working on "inventing" some for the circumscribed tetrahedron and circumscribed truncated icosahedron. But by now, *even I* (who know nothing about these things, it takes me weeks to solve geometry problems that knowledgeable people can do in 15 minutes) know that you cannot properly represent a three dimensional circumscribed tetrahedron in 2-d by projecting the edges all the way to the edges of the circumscribing sphere- that is a triangle not a tetrahedron- nor can you proceed to label "27 degrees" on account of it. The tetrahedron from such a view will appear smaller hence the bottom will be positioned higher than that. And that's which "27 degrees", a 27 degree angle from the center of the sphere to the apex of the tetrahedron or 27 degrees of latitude?

IMHO, he's seemingly defeated the very point he was most vociferous about in a way that suggests that whatever valid points can be ferret out of that, if any, are probably deliberately buried otherside of a minefield of debunkery is you just fell off the haytruck on this completely.

Not that I understand this either, but Hoagland's Message of Cydonia" reads concerning these things (the page is at Lunar Anomalies but it looks like technical difficulties there so I am reading it from a Google cache) in case it is of relevance:

Lunar Anomalies

"Almost immediately, he discovered something quite astonishing (to a non-specialist): the surface area of a tetrahedron (the "lowest order," simplest Platonic form), inscribed inside a "higher-order" form -- a sphere-- results in a surface ratio (sphere/tetrahedron) almost precisely equivalent to "e," the base of natural logarithms:

e = 2.718282

surface of sphere

=(-?) 2.720699

surface of circumscribed tetrahedron

Difference = 0.002417

The derivation of the above is as follows: (expressions are written in FORTRAN notation)

Let A(t) = surface area of tetrahedron
A(s) = surface area of circumscribing sphere
R = radius of circumscribing sphere

For a regular tetrahedron of edge a:

A(t) = a**2 * sqrt(3) and R = a * sqrt(6)/4

For the circumscribing sphere:

A(s) = 4*pi*R**2 = 4*pi * (a*sqrt(6)/4)**2 = (3/2)*pi*a**2

Area of sphere/area of circumscribed tetrahedron

A(s)/A(t) = (3/2)*pi*a**2/(a**2 * sqrt(3)) = 3*pi/(2*sqrt (3))

A(s)/A(t) = 2.720699 - an approximation of e = 2.718282

(AND...)

In working out the several possible implications of such geometry, Torun promptly discovered the following: if a circumscribed tetrahedron is placed inside a globe representing a gridded planetary surface, with one vertex located either on the geographical "North" or "South" polar axis, the resulting latitude TANGENT to the other three vertices will lie at 19.5 degrees N. or S. -- 120 degrees of longitude apart.

Torun (1989) immediately noted on Earth the existence of several significant Meso-American ceremonial complexes at this specific northern latitude -- raising intriguing cultural and scientific possibilities for lost or forgotten "ancient knowledge of the significance of circumscribed tetrahedral geometry" (Becker and Hagen, 1987). Unfortunately, these implications are too extensive for inclusion here.

Hoagland noted something more physically significant: the largest shield volcanic complex on Earth -- the Hawaiian Caldera -- is located very close to 19.5 North! He then realized that a similar latitude marks the location of the largest shield volcano currently known in the entire solar system: Olympus Mons, at 19 N. -- on Mars."

I am not sure what is meant by "the resulting latitude TANGENT to the other three vertices will lie at 19.5 degrees N. or S.". I do refer often to Harleston, whose material is discussed in "Secrets of the Mexican Pyramids" by Topkins, including pg 280, where we see the lower apices of the tetrahedron *at* an (obviously rounded 19.47* latitude) (Hoagland's "Monuments" cites Harleston briefly as independent confirmation), although I'm not fully certain how related the premise that "Harleston finds it significant that if you stand a tetrahedron on its nose at the South Pole it will form three triangles above the equator splitting the world into four equilateral triangles which will exactly divide into areas of 1/3 above and 2/3 below the equator" (Tompkins p 280) is related to the (sin Tetrahedral Latitude =.333333...) that Michael and Hoagland refer to (maybe I should scan the diagram and post it to a webpage? primarily it looks like something from Hoagland), but...

I mean, there's probably some kind of unknown ramification of the fact that this math wants to describe perfect spheres, which planets do not tend to be... with Mars, Michael's Matrix-related polar and equatorial circumference figures seem to possibly be ,data in their own right, and maybe generate a specific special tetrahedron which is equally meaningful in a certain way. I'm sure this is worth pursuing. I have been encouraging people in that direction over at Grid Point somewhat. There is some room for deviation from a "perfect" tetrahedron (as for all of the Planetary Platonic Solids) I think. As much room as this fellow gives, or room for the particular meaning he assigns, I don't think so :-)

The fellow in question also seems to gleefully miss the point altogether that no one is saying that Giza is at 19.5 (not presently anyway; Munck's suggestion seems to be 19.4677367* latitude prior to the Akpatok polar shift for Giza), but this is not the same thing as considering pyramids in a broader sense, quite obviously.

I think maybe he is thinking if he closes his eyes, Hoagland and Torun's work and Mary Anne Weaver's work and everyone's work and all of the implications will all go away? At the least, trying to persuade himself by way of trying to persuade everyone else?

You do have a wonderful point in that it would be nice to actually possess the textbook formulas. Being able to *demonstrate* that the tetrahedron's vertices "nest" at @19.5 would be much better than saying "Hoagland says"... I have Bruce Rawle's formulas for polyhedra of course, but I'm still rather looking for diagrams that are clear or reliable enough to confirm how the figures are being applied experimentally in lieu of textbook formulas...

Anyone who find this easy, especially, please chime in :-)

Here is my not at all intelligent "take" on "19.5"... Correct, yes/no? Maybe? :-)

Grid Point

Cheers, Robert (Chronos)

_______________________________

99.49.14 18 Anu / Isis (Jerry Iuliano) 

From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com
Subject: 18 Anu / Isis
Date: 01/17/02

MP:

From the idea of the difference between the proton (NIST 1998..938.271998 Mev) and neutron (NIST 1998..939.56533 Mev):

NEUTRAL CHARGE...no spin = 939.56533 Mev= n

POSITIVE CHARGE....spin....= 938.271999231 Mev = p

n-p = q = 1.293330769 Mev

the twelfth iteration of this symbolic "spin" difference equals the "collective unconscious" constant:

q^q^q^q^q^q^q^q^q^q^q^q = 77.963543776 = C.U.

This constant is the hub of the mythological cosmic mind wheel that leads to the connection of sentient Being/Mind thought forms that bubble up as mathematical force field interactions between the four fundamental forces in the three dimensional block. That is the ratios of the four forces are:

Electromagnetic = a(em)= fine-structure constant = 1/137.03599976 (NIST 1998)

Strong force = a(s) = 14

Weak force = G(w) = Fermi coupling charge = .0000116639 Fm

Gravitational force = G(n) = 6.6728*(10^-11) mks

From the "collective unconscious" constant (C.U.) = 77.9625437724 divide the mythological number of the Egyptian primary deity ISIS (18) or ANU (18 -hydrogen) to get the dimensions of the Cheops pyramid (Churchward / Ramsey / Petrie..1887- 1910..height = 486.256 ft ; base leg = 763.81 ft):

log(C.U./ISIS(18) = ht/bl ht = 486.256009

From the "collective unconscious" constant (C.U.) the representation of the fine-structure constant [a(em)] can be derived through the trance / dream numbers of John of Patmos as the ratio of the "collective unconscious" constant: 144, 37, 1260, 666...

[(10^(143.9999881/37))]/(10^2) = C.U.= 77.96354377

such that:

[[C.U.*(10^2)]/666]^2 = 137.036003514

The commonality of the ISIS/JOHN constant (18) reveals that the Cheops pyramid is a geometrically symbolic representation of the fine-structure constant when used with John's trance/dream number of the beast..37*18 = 666:

BETA FORM = (10^(2*ht/bl))/(.37^2) = 137.03599976

ISIS / JOHN FORM = (10^(ht/bl))*18 = C.U. = 77.96354275

ht = 486.2560047

The strong force a(s) =14 (Michio Kaku's book; QUANTUM THEORY: A Modern Introduction...page 6) can be directly related to the gravitational force G(n) through the "collective unconscious" constant (C.U.):

[[C.U. / ISIS(18)]^2]*a(s) = m = Fermat form = 262.6432043..

such that the mass constituent (Plank mass...M(p) of the gravitational formula can be demonstrated as:

1/[(m^2)*37*ISIS(18)] = Planck mass =2.176674223*(10^-8) kilograms

NIST 1998--Plank mass = 2.17667*(10^-8) kilograms, where Gn) can be demonstrated as:

G(n) = h*c/2/Pi/(M(p)^2) = 6.672827599*(10^-11) mks

where h = Planck's constant = 6.62606876*(10^-34) J (NIST 1998)

where c = metric speed of light = 299792458 m (NIST 1998)

The weak force G(w).. Fermi-coupling charge =.0000116639 Fm the fourth and final field force is derived from the "collective unconscious" constant using the LEAHY / HEBREW (Sephira Malkuth number 288^2 = 82944 in its transformation to natural log e::

[[82944+(403/88)]^(1/Pi]/100 = 1/2.718281828 = 1/e

such that if a length of 400 divided by 403 times , producted C.U. squared divided by the strong force a(s) =14 equals the fermi coupling charge..G(w):

400/403/(C.U.^2)/a(s) = .00001166389944 = G(w)

There is a universal integer that bridges the electro / weak forces; G(w) and a(em) through the "collective unconscious" constant (C.U.):

[(sqrt25117)*11*(sqrt20)]/100 = C.U. = 77.96354276

which suggest a link to the ISIS / JOHN form through the fine-structure constant:

(666^2)/25117/(11^2)/20 = a(em) = 1/137.035999963

(Kinoshita; Cornell University 1998..1/137.035999935 = a(em)

Gravity can be derived from this integer (25117) by using the Fermat form with fine-structure:

(e^2)*(e^((2*Pi)+16))*25117*(11^2)*5/E/Pi = G(n) = 6.67282369*(10^-11)

where (e^2) = elementary charge squared = 2.566969412*(10^-38)

e= elementary charge = 1.602176461*(10^-19) C (NIST 1998)

E = electric constant = 8.8541878*(10^-12)

(e^(2*Pi))+16 uses natural log e = 2.718281828..

Interesting that the HEBREW (Sephira Malkuth..288) / CHRISTIAN / LEAHY (triple logic cube...82944) / EGYPTIAN (Cheops constructs...ht/bl) can be combined when using cosine in radians of the inverse fine-structure constant...1/a(em) =137.03599976..:

[288^(ht/bl)]/(10^2)] = COS 137.03599976 ht = 486.2560047

(10^(2*ht/bl))/(.37^2) = 137.035999931 ht = 486.2560047

These last two equations reveal the mystery of prof. Leahy's philosophy of the triple logic cube (surface area equals 82944) and the meaning behind his idea of "thinking now created 100" , a result of his analyzing the tetrahedrons of the triple logic cube. The equations show a transformation of constants (.37 and 10) in the non-cosine form (linear) for fine-structure to their cosine forms. The formula

(10^(2*ht/bl))/(.37^2) = 137.03599976

reveals that the height parameter of the Cheops constructs controls the transformation to the cosine form. Subtracting one height module from the formula transforms Beta squared (.37^2) into Leahy's philosophical 100 while concurrently 10 transforms into the square root of the surface area of the triple logic cube..288:

(288^(ht/bl))/(10^2) = COS 137.035999931

The cosine action keeps the numerical value of the fine-structure constant symbolically equivalent. Everything involved in the transformation depends on the action in the exponent ruled by the adding or subtracting of one height of the Cheops pyramid. Two heights means square root of the surface area of the triple logic cube..288 divided by the"thinking now created 100" creates the ANGULAR measure in radians of the fine-structure constant. One height means ten divided by Beta squared (.37^2) equals the LINEAR measure of the fine-structure constant. The secret of the numerical "tools" 100, .37 and 288 is that by using these values the angular and linear forms of the fine-structure constant become equivalent:

( 10^ ( 2*ht / bl )) / ( .37^2 ) = linear

(288^ ( 1*ht / bl )) / (10^2 ) = angular

In mathematics the only known equivalences of angular to linear measurement is the radian or linear radius wrapped on the arc length,180 / Pi, (straight line..180) divided by circle (Pi). Is the radian related to the fine-structure, Beta, Cheops constructs, etc.? The answer is yes because of the very definition of the radian straight line 180 (ISIS*10) brings the ISIS constant (18) into play.

Let radian = ISIS(18) * 10 / PI = 57.2957795131 = r

Then fine-structure constant can be expressed in linear inverse form:

(r^(2*ht/bl))*(37^2)/(5700^2) = a(em) = 1/137.03599996

ht = 486.25639693

in linear form:

(5700^2)/(r^(2*ht/bl))/(37^2) = 1/137.03599996

The radian form uses the Fermat constant 57 as divisor. The radian form links directly to the strong a(s)...14 and electromagnetic a(em)...1/137.03599976 forces in the Beta (.37) form through the Cheops constructs: 10^(ht/bl):

57/(r^(ht/bl) = [e^((Pi+8)/4)]/sqrt a(s) = .37/sqrt a(em)

57/(r^(ht/bl)) = 4.331313052.............ht = 486.25639693

[e^((Pi+8)/4)]/sqrt a(s) = 4.331307928

.37/(sqrt a(em)) = 4.331307928

57 and 37 are used as harmonic means (1/57+1/37) in the fine-structure constant that is of the Fermat form; e^(Pi+8):

(sqrt 137.03599976)/(1/57+1/37) = sqrt (e^(Pi+7.999999806)

such that the strong force a(s)...14 is:

(sqrt 137.03599996)/(1/57+1/37)/(10^2*ht/bl) = a(s) = 14

ht = 486.2559686

The 57---37 harmonic determines the Planck mass M(p) in one step:

1/[[137.03599996/(1/57+1/37)^2)]*666] = M(p) = 2.176685281*(10^-8)

Substituting 2*E*h*c/(e^2) for inverse fine-structure:

((h*c)^3)*(E^2)*2*(666^2/(e^4)/Pi/((1/57+1/37)^4) = G(n) = 6.67282109*(10^-11)

which is the gravitational constant. In the interplay of the Pi and natural log e forms the following was observed:

100/[(82944+(403/88))^(1/Pi)] = e = 2.71828182..

(403+(1/333))/88*666 = 3050

[sqrt(3050*.373737..)]*180/(a(s)^2) = 31.0062766838

Pi^3 = 31.0062766803 .

.3737373 = 37 / 99

The radian and 57 are connected to the Cheops constructs..ht/bl

57/(r^(ht/bl)) = 10^(ht/bl)

isolate the radian:

r = [57/(10^(ht/bl))]^(bl/ht)

isolate ISIS (18):

(57/(10^ht/bl))]^(bl/ht)]*Pi/10 = ISIS (18)

to reduce the radian to primitive form:

(57^(bl/ht))*Pi/10 = ISIS (18)

This is the source of the beast number 666, a multiple of 37, through 57, and the Cheops constructs using the radian:

(57^(bl/ht))*(37*Pi)/(10^2) = 666

ht = 486.25639693

J.Iuliano

Page 49

Sections List- 99 Electrons and Mythologies
Impossible Correspondence Index

Copyright. Robert Grace. 2001