99.25.1 CATALYZATION Toward a Higher Level .. (Michael Morton)  

Page 25

Sections List- 99 Electrons and Mythologies
Impossible Correspondence Index

In a message dated 07/18/2001,

Michael writes:

Subj: CATALYZATION Toward a Higher Level ..
Date: 07/18/2001
From: Michael Morton

CATALYZED BY CERTAIN CROP FORMATIONS
in England During 2001

Evidence Toward an "Ideal Fine Structure Constant"
-- Michael Lawrence Morton (c) 2001

This article (in the form of email, at present) will touch upon some crucial findings involved in my work, having to do with what I've called, the "Archaeo-Sky Matrix", or ASM. I'd call myself a "generalist", for those who want a short, tidy description of my "area of expertise", if you will. I realize that many people still prefer to have such a 'description' at hand, for 'whatever' reasons. And I'm essentially an empiricist, although I do seem to have 'contributions' coming from a "right brain", as well. I hope such contributions can, and will, continue .. in spite of the "political climate" these days.

_______________________________

AVEBURY Crop Formation
Found on 20th June, 2001 in Wiltshire, UK

For a brief description .. go to ..

http://www.cropcircleresearch.com/cgi-bin/CCdb?d=uk01ao

For a good photo .. go to ..

http://home.clara.net/lucypringle/photos/2001/uk01ao.jpg

For the latitude/longitude datapage for this crop formation .. go to ..

http://www.cropcircleresearch.com/cgi-bin/OS.cgi?os=SU%20117706

_______________________________

This crop formation was found about a day prior to the finding of what I have called, the "Solar (Pyramid) Apex" crop formation .. which, in turn, was found on the June solstice (21st). This particular June solstice involved a solar eclipse, as well, along_with_a longitudinal opposition to SOLAR APEX. I wrote an article about this special June, 2001, solstice/eclipse crop formation .. which you may have received via email.

Here are my "ASM" figures for the AVEBURY, 20th June, 2001 formation ... which is what I have assessed to be, the "obviously-intended" ASM 'placement' of this crop formation.

Grid LAT .. 51 (deg) X 25 (min) X 59.96049174 (sec) North .. = 76449.62697 North.

Grid LONG .. 32 (deg) X 57 (min) X 55.03713177 (sec) W.Giza .. = 100387.7283 W.Giza. [ W.Greenwich 01 deg 49 min 54.23713177 sec ].

Grid POINT Value .. 100387.7283 / 76449.62697 = 1.31312254

_______________________________

Note .. this Grid POINT Value is a decimal harmonic of the 'generic' Area on a Square .. if you assume a numerical value of 57.29577951 for a "given" radius. The figure 57.29577951 is the fractional, irrational figure .. to 8 decimal places .. of the_number_of degrees-of-arc on a circumference of 360 arc-degrees. Of course, 360 is the "conventional" number of arc-degrees on one circumference, in "our" geometric system.

The side-length of such a 'generic' Square would be of 2 radii. (2 X 57.29577951) = 114.591559 (arc-deg).

Area of a Square = side-length Squared ... = (114.591559 X 114.591559) = 13131.2254 Square arc-degrees.

_______________________________

CORRELATION TO "The Face" @ Cydonia on Mars

There is an immediately recognizable correlation, to me as a student of the "ASM", involving the Grid POINT Value of "The Face" @ Cydonia on Mars. Carl P.Munck, Sr. found it, and self-published it in "The Code", 1992, as .. 656.56127 It is, numerically, exactly 1/5th of the 'Square' of the 57.29577951 arc-degrees *Radian-arc* .. (57.29577951 X 57.29577951) = 3282.80635 Square arc-degrees.

Then ... (3282.80635 / 5) = 656.56127

Also .. 656.56127 = [36 Radians (deg) / Pi].

_______________________________

At this time, I also refer to what I have called, "Miami Square". This is an actual square plot of ground, located in Miami, Florida, USA, where The Miami Circle is the northeastern 'corner-point' of this square plot of land. This square is aligned perfectly to the 4 cardinal points.

(Morton, 1999, Internet).

The azimuth from The Miami Circle to the southwestern corner-point of this square .. is .. 225 arc-degrees. This southwestern corner-point is the exact location of an ancient water well. The ancient well was actually pointed-out to me by a personal contact of mine who lives in the Miami area. In October of 1999, I physically saw the well-opening, and I paced-off the number of feet to the curbsides of the intersecting streets nearest to this ancient water well. I then carefully located the spot of the well, on the official USGS topo map .. scale 1 : 24000 .. 7.5-minute Quad .. and I measured its azimuth from the exact location of The Miami Circle, whose "ASM" figures I had already found by then.

(Morton, 1999, Internet).

Visiting the actual site of this ancient water well thus confirmed, for me, the verbal description of the well's location given to me over the telephone by my Miami contact (mentioned earlier). My visit to the site in October of 1999 also confirmed for me .. the_apparently_planned side-length for this square 'plot' of ground .. My visit to the site in October of 1999 also confirmed for me .. the_apparently_planned side-length for this square 'plot' of ground .. as .. ("Pi X The Face") in terms of regular ("British") feet. That is .. (3.141592654 X 656.56127) = 2062.648063 regular feet. I thought of that as "Pi Face" .. or .. Pi*Face.

In 1998, on The Internet, I had put forward my proposed "precisely-intended" length for The Royal Cubit .. 20.62648063 regular ("British") inches. Again .. it was the 57.29577951 numerical value of The Radian (arc), assuming 360 arc-degrees on one circumference, that "showed me" the very_likely_"intended" (by the designers/builders) value of The Royal Cubit. So .. in a side-length for "Miami Square" .. of 2062.648063 regular feet .. I observed a decimal harmonic of the value in_inches_for my proposed Royal Cubit length. And, of course, I had the "Pi*Face" going for me, too.

Surface Area on a Hemisphere = 2Pi X (radius Squared). So .. (2 X 3.141592654) X (57.29577951 X 57.29577951) .. = 20626.48063 Square arc-degrees. That, of course, is the origin of "Pi*Face", and, of The Royal Cubit in regular inches. The key is the use of 360 arc-degrees on one circumference. Of course, this implies the use of the "360" system in_very_deep antiquity. (And on 2 planets).

I have also proposed that the "intended-length" of the floor of "The King's Chamber" within The Great Pyramid of Giza is .. 20 Royal Cubits of 20.62648063 regular inches per Royal Cubit, as opposed to "pyramid inches". This would give a "precisely-intended" length of 412.5296125 regular inches, for "The King's Chamber". The width of that floor would be .. 206.2648063 regular inches .. 10 Royal Cubits.

(Morton, 1998, Internet).

In terms of regular feet, the length of "The King's Chamber" would be .. (412.5296125 / 12) = 34.37746771 regular feet .. a decimal harmonic of the POLAR RADIUS of Earth in nautical miles !! (21,600 / 2Pi) = 3437.746771 nmi.

(Morton, 1998, Internet).

The projected Area of "Miami Square" is .. (2062.648063 X 2062.648063) = 4254517.032 Sq. Feet .. a decimal harmonic of the Grid LAT of the site at Bethlehem, (Morton, 1998, Internet) located just several_feet_away from the spot identified by Bruce Cathie, on page 109 of "The Harmonic Conquest of Space", as a profoundly-important intersection of latitude and longitude in terms of his (B.Cathie's) 'geomagnetic' Earth grid. B.Cathie's assessment of that particular location in Bethlehem, ties it precisely to the location of the Church at Rennes-le-Chateau. I have (Morton, 1998, Internet) found what I consider to be an "obviously-intended" Grid POINT Value of 2Pi_for_the Church at its centered location @ Rennes-le-Chateau in the South of France.

(2Pi X 20626.48063) = 129600 .. the 'generic' Surface Area on a TORUS (Morton, 2001, Internet) .. (2Pi) Squared X (radius Squared) = 129600 Sq. arc-degrees. { 39.4784176 X (57.29577951 X 57.29577951) = 129600 }.

BACK TO "MIAMI SQUARE"

As I posted on The Internet in 1999, I figured-out the "ASM" numbers for the ancient water well's location, in addition to the ASM numbers for The Miami Circle. And, I again thank Richard C.Hoagland, for giving me his own GPS-unit measurement via telephone, early in February of 1999, for the location of The Miami Circle. Of course, I later confirmed the relatively-high accuracy of Richard's GPS-unit reading, by way of the official USGS topographical map .. 7.5-minute Series Quad, scale 1 : 24000, along with my on-site observations. I was there in mid-February of 1999, and again in October of 1999.

Because of the (apparently) precise azimuth of 225 arc-degrees, from The Miami Circle to the ancient water well .. I was inspired to think in terms of a "Square". I wondered if maybe the designers/builders had layed-out some sort of "implied", or even an 'actual' or 'functional' .. square plot.

Using the official USGS topo map, I carefully measured-out a square plot, converting the arc-seconds on the map to fractional inches (a scale ratio) on my ruler .. which is my standard procedure.

I had the "ASM" figures, to the best of my ability, for The Miami Circle and for the ancient water well. I then used my Grid LAT for The Miami Circle, as the Grid LAT for the northwestern corner-point of the square plot. Also, of course, I used my Grid LONG for the ancient water well, as the Grid LONG for the northwestern corner-point. I then did the same procedure to get the "ASM" values for the southeastern corner-point.

I wanted a "center-point", too, for this square plot. Again, using the official USGS topo map, I measured as best I could, and I was able to find a Grid LONG for the center-point, of .. believe-it-or-not .. 65656.127 W.Giza .. = 111 (deg) X 19 (min) X 31.13140209 (sec) W.Giza. [ W.Greenwich 80 deg 11 min 30.33140209 sec ].

It was the "apparently-obvious intention", as I call it .. of the designers/builders, to 'center' this square at a W.Giza Grid LONG that_would_be a decimal harmonic of "The Face" @ Cydonia on Mars. That's the way I've learned to "think", when it comes to assessing sites/structures for possible "ASM" significance.

Then, it was back to the USGS topo map, to carefully measure, in an attempt to find an "ASM-logical" Grid LAT for the center-point. I found it to be .. 66523.56505 North .. = 25 (deg) X 45 (min) X 59.13205782 (sec) North.

The center-point's Grid POINT Value .. 66523.56505 / 65656.127 = 1.013211837 .. a decimal harmonic of the *reciprocal* of (Pi Squared) !! ..

(1 / 9.869604401) = 0.101321184 .. to 9 decimal places.

_______________________________

MY "ASM" FIGURES FOR THE MIAMI CIRCLE
AND FOR THE ANCIENT WATER WELL

I call this ancient water well, "The Well of Osiris", by the way.

As I posted around 2 years ago, as of this writing .. my "ASM" figures for The Miami Circle ..

Grid LAT Miami Circle .. = 25 (deg) X 46 (min) X 9.391304348 (sec) North .. = 10800 North.

Grid LONG Miami Circle ..111 (deg) X 19 (min) X 19.83320064 (sec) W.Giza .. = 41828.22014 W.Giza. [ W.Greenwich 80 deg 11 min 19.03320064 sec ].

Grid POINT Value Miami Circle .. 41828.22014 / 10800 = 3.872983346 .. Square Root of 15.

(Morton, 1999, Internet).

How appropriate .. the square root of 15 .. and 15 is the esoteric number of "OSIRIS Re-membered" .. all 15 'parts', in effect, after ISIS is helped by the great ancient *wisdom* of Thoth. It was Thoth's great_knowledge_that helped ISIS to become "impregnated" from the "remains" of OSIRIS .. thus enabling the birth of HORUS.

I do think The Miami Circle, itself, is the actual remains of .. the so-called "Fountain of Youth". There is something very special about the number 89. It is the "alphanumeric sum" of .. OSIRIS .. and, of .. YOUTH.

"FOUNTAIN" .. alphanumeric sum of .. 100 .. the Square of 10.

"YOUTH FOUNTAIN" .. (89 + 100) = 189. (189 - 144) = 45 .. alphanumeric sum of .. "MIAMI".

The 45 arc-deg angle . is the angle of a diagonal in a Square.

I think it is likely that certain "sweet waters" used to come "springing-forth" out of the many holes in the porous limestone bedrock at the site of The Miami Circle. This phenomenon .. whether "natural" or "artificially-induced" .. probably stopped when the Earth shifted circa 10,500 B.C. or thereabouts .. when a new axial pole was formed.

Could that "sweet water" have had beneficial health properties for humans or for "humanoids" ? Maybe that water had certain properties that could actually enhance or "maintain" humanoid longevity. I do wonder.

Grid LAT Ancient Water Well .. 25 (deg) X 45 (min) X 48.92776124 (sec) North .. = 55043.73139 North.

Grid LONG Ancient Water Well .. 111 (deg) X 19 (min) X 42.34143046 (sec) W.Giza .. = 89298.07684 W.Giza. [ W.Greenwich 80 deg 11 min 41.54143046 sec ].

Grid POINT Value Ancient Water Well .. 89298.07684 / 55043.73139 = 1.622311471

_______________________________

Notice .. 89298.07684 is a numerical match of the Grid LAT of The Great Pyramid of Giza. (Munck, 1992, "The Code").

Also .. 55043.73139 is a numerical match of the Grid LAT of Monks Mound at Cahokia, Illinois. (Munck, 1992, "The Code").

Notice the multiplied-product of the Grid POINT Values of The Miami Circle and the ancient water well .. (3.872983346 X 1.622311471) = 6.283185309 .. 2Pi.

Notice, now, how the "ASM" numbers for the northwestern and the southeastern corner-points of the "square plot" .. interact ..

First .. I'll give you the ASM Grid LAT and Grid LONG figures ..

1) NW corner .. (89298.07684 / 10800) = 8.268340448
2) SE corner .. (55043.73139 / 41828.22014) = 1.315947253

(8.268340448 / 1.315947253) = 6.283185307 .. 2Pi.

So .. you have (2Pi) in a "squared layout" .. especially evident from an aerial view !!

You have (2Pi) "duplicated" in this interaction among the 4 corner-points of "Miami Square". In one case .. it's a multiplied-product, and in the other case, it's a quotient. In effect, you can "view" this layout from above, and "mentally" visualize a perfect "X" .. as 2 diagonals in the square. Then, as you "visualize" looking down from above The Great Pyramid of Giza, you can "see" the 4 edges of that pyramid .. forming the same kind of perfect "X" pattern.

Looking "down" on "Miami Square" .. you see the 2 "diagonals", of (2Pi) .. "squared" to one-another at right-angles.

_______________________________

BACK TO SURFACE AREA ON A TORUS

Recall from earlier in this article .. the formula for Surface Area on a TORUS .. using the 57.29577951 numerical value as "given radius" .. (2Pi) Squared X (radius Squared) .. = 39.4784176 X (57.29577951 X 57.29577951) = 129600 Sq. arc-deg.

Yes ... (2Pi) Squared is a major figure in the "ASM". (Pun intended).

It figures very_directly_as a factor involved in the correlation of the precise location of "The Face" @ Cydonia on Mars .. with .. Earth's precession cycle in years .. (656.56127 X 39.4784176) = 25920.

Recall, again, from earlier in this article .. the Grid POINT Value I found for the center-point of this "Miami Square" .. 1.013211837 .. a decimal harmonic of the *reciprocal* of (Pi Squared).

Also earlier in this article, I mentioned how the numerical value of the 'generic' Area of a SQUARE is .. 13131.2254 Sq. arc-deg. (You use 2 radii in the formula .. which is the side-length of a square). See this shown in detail, earlier in this article.

(13131.2254 / 0.1013211837) = 129600 .. again, the generic numerical value for Surface Area on a TORUS .. in the conventional 360 geometric system !!

By now, certainly (hopefully), you are 'seeing' how dramatically-obvious and how "intentional" all of this is. I strongly suggest that it has been The "Anunnaki" (see works of Z.Sitchin, N.Freer, and L.Gardner) who have been the "most-recent" stewards, if you will, involved in the_maintenance_of this deeply ancient "ASM" .. through various axial "pole shifts" of Earth, etc. This doesn't mean that I "assume" the "Anunnaki" necessarily originated this entire "ASM" .. but I do think they are the most-recent "overseers / modifiers" of it, if you will, at least on Earth, on Mars, and probably on our Moon as well.

And I really need to make_this_clear : I do_NOT_think of "The "Anunnaki" as "aliens". So .. please .. do not put 'words in my mouth' .. to the effect that .. "He thinks ALIENS 'did all this' and 'CREATED US', besides, blah-blah-blah".

Ohhhh, no. Heh-heh !! Don't you all worry, now .. (-; .. It's still "we are them" and "they are us", after all. We're all united in this Universe. Oneness, you know. It's just that "we", in my *opinion* .. "we" of this latest polar (axial) round, on Earth .. are a "special case" .. in the sense that we have 'apparently' experienced ..

1) a quite abrupt 'customizing' involved in 'some' genetic engineering .. involving "kingship / queenship / leadership" lines .. the 'personal' genes (sperm) of an "Anunnaki" leader (EN.KI./E.A.).

2) an equally abrupt "abandonment" .. (see works of Neil Freer, here, and also the works of Swiss psychologist / psychiatrist Alice Miller) .. a historically real, physical abandonment of "us" by the "Anunnaki". To me, it is apparent that the so-called "gods and goddesses" were not mythological, but very much "flesh-and-blood" real .. and they lived here on Earth in "deep antiquity". They were / are humanoids, very much_literally_related to "us".

There are significant emotional/psychological/cultural effects that this caused .. many of which are still "repressed" in terms of our individual and "collective" unconscious. I feel that the ground-breaking work of Z.Sitchin has been the first_effective_"catalyst" .. in helping us .. to "re-member". I think much of the trauma of the abandonment is still repressed, however .. which has been causing much of the "problems" within society and within individuals. Yes .. the key to aleviating these problems is .. **awareness**, as Alice Miller says so well in her books. "Remembering" .. although painful at first .. is one of the_necessary_steps in bonafide therapy.

-- Michael Lawrence Morton

{{ TO BE CONTINUED }}

_______________________________

In a message dated 07/18/2001,

MetPhys writes:

Subj: CATALYZATION Toward a Higher Level ..
Date: 07/18/2001
From: MetPhys@aol.com

Michael,

I'm glad you decided the Anunnaki are not alien beings but a kind of ancestral human of different powers. I am also arriving at that conclusion after 25 yrs of studying all the Egyptian, Roman, Hebrew and Greek cosmology (the beginning) and cosmogony (the process)... first.

I decided to let you namedrop whomever you wish, but I will quiz you on your conclusions and post them and create links to this Email to you, that conjecture the names that you introduce, not wanting to edit parts of your Email. If you don't want to, or don't have the time to answer my mail about this, I will note that and continue evaluating Sumerian cosmology, which is one of the last problems I have taken on. Sumer cosmology is extremely vague and nebulous and I left it for a last evaluation. But...I think that it should finally agree with the other 4 major mythologies from which study-base, I have an insight or two into what Sumerian cosmology was about. I have heard it said the the Greeks deliberately made their gods so fantastic so as to be, not believed, but understood. So it should be with all other cosmologies, unless, of course, all the subsequent mythologies have mis.interpreted the root Sumerian cosmology, which debate is still up for discussion.

I have had serious discussions about some of Sitchin's human origins and advancement, which at times, degenerated into common street fights with the worshippers of Sitchin's new religion. I decided that Sitchin does have merit in his almost prophetic predictions of certain archaeological sites found where he pointed to. The extent of study is also commendable but...

As Thomas Jefferson was reported to have said, "The purpose of the Christian Church is to engender eternal argument, for church profit" and I feel that any borderland cosmology such as Sitchin's interpretation about "the Gods coming down and mating with humans" is what Jefferson's comment could be applied to. There remains, some sinister motives within the religions and mythologies that has to be brought to light.

On the one hand: Anunnaki is probably another name for a creative power in the other myths. Likely within the context.

On the other hand: Anunnaki could be interior-looking, (psychic) human beings before we were "pushed outward" into an external mindset. Also likely within the context.

The third possibility: Anunnaki were alien which I see as an "intervention" into a very natural cosmology of the human race and I keep asking for proof of this but it is never forthcoming.

Of course, no "side" can claim proof of their conclusions. I've been there and tried to do that.

I am in the process of paralleling Sumer Gods with the other Mythologies. I am trying to order the descent of the Gods and Goddesses of Sumer, in order, comparing it with Egyptian, Roman, Hebrew and Greek cosmology, IF I can get more documentation of Sumer Gods and Goddesses. This is not an easy feat to pull off.

Robert
rgrace@rgrace.org
Home: http://www.rgrace.org/index.html

Page 25

Sections List- 99 Electrons and Mythologies
Impossible Correspondence Index

Copyright. Robert Grace. 2001