| 
		 As an adult, Hope donated sizable sums of money to the institution. 
		Silent film comedian
		
		
		Fatty Arbuckle saw one of his performances with his first 
		 
		partner, 
		Lloyd "Lefty" Durbin, and in 1925 got the pair steady work with Hurley's 
		 
		Jolly Follies. Within a year, Hope had formed an act called the 
		Dancemedians with 
 George Byrne and the 
		
		Hilton Sisters, conjoined twins who had a tap dancing routine. 
 Hope 
		and his partner George Byrne had an act as a pair of Siamese twins as 
		well, 
 and both danced and sang while wearing 
		
		blackface, before friends advised Hope that 
		 
		he was funnier as himself. In 1929, he changed his first name to "Bob". In one version 
		 
		of the 
		story, he named himself after racecar driver 
		
		Bob 
		Burman. In another, he said  
		he chose Bob because he wanted a name 
		with a friendly "Hiya Fellas!" sound to it.  
		After five years on the 
		vaudeville circuit, by his own account, Hope was surprised and  
		humbled 
		when he and his partner (and future wife) Grace Louise Troxell failed a 
		1930 
 screen test for 
		
		Pathé at
		
		
		Culver City, California. 
		]Career
		
		 Film
		
		Hope, like other stage performers, made his first films in New York.
		 
		
		
		Educational Pictures employed him in 1934 for a short-subject 
		comedy, 
		
		Going Spanish. 
 Hope sealed his fate with Educational when 
		
		Walter Winchell asked him about the film. 
 Hope cracked, "When they 
		catch 
		
		John Dillinger, they're going to make him sit through 
 it twice." 
		Educational fired him, but he was soon before the cameras at New York's
		 
		
		
		Vitaphone studio starring in 20-minute comedies and musicals from 
		1934 through 1936, 
		beginning with 
		
		Paree, Paree (1934). 
		
		
		Paramount Pictures signed Hope for the 1938 film 
		
		
		The Big Broadcast of 1938. During 
		 
		a duet with 
		
		Shirley Ross as accompanied by
		
		
		Shep Fields and his orchestra, Hope 
		 
		introduced the song later to 
		become his trademark, "Thanks 
		for the Memory", which 
 became a major hit and was praised by 
		critics. The sentimental, fluid nature of the 
 music allowed Hope's 
		writers (whom he is said to have depended upon heavily 
 throughout his 
		career) to later invent endless variations of the song to fit specific 
		 
		circumstances, such as bidding farewell to troops while on tour. 
		Hope became one of Paramount's biggest stars, and 
		would remain with the studio  
		through the 1950s. Hope's regular appearances in Hollywood films and 
		radio made  
		him one of the best known entertainers in North America, and at the 
		height of his  
		career he was also making a large income from live concert performances 
		
		As a movie star, he was best known for 
		
		My Favorite Brunette and the highly 
 successful 
		
		"Road" movies in which he starred with
		
		
		Bing Crosby and
		
		
		Dorothy 
		
		 Lamour. Hope had seen Lamour as a nightclub singer in New 
		York, and invited 
 her to work on his 
		
		USO tours. Lamour is said to have arrived for filming 
		 
		prepared with 
		her lines, only to be baffled by completely re-written scripts from 
 Hope's writers without studio permission. Hope and Lamour were lifelong 
		friends,  
		and she is the actress most associated with his film career. 
		 
		 
		beginning with 
		
		Paree, Paree (1934). 
		
		
		Paramount Pictures signed Hope for the 1938 film 
		
		
		The Big Broadcast of 1938. 
 During a duet with 
		
		Shirley Ross as accompanied by
		
		
		Shep Fields and his orchestra, 
 Hope introduced the song later to 
		become his trademark, "Thanks 
		for the Memory",  
		which became a major hit and was praised by 
		critics. The sentimental, fluid nature 
 of the music allowed Hope's 
		writers (whom he is said to have depended upon heavily 
 throughout his 
		career) to later invent endless variations of the song to fit specific 
 circumstances, such as bidding farewell to troops while on tour. 
		Hope became one of Paramount's biggest stars, and would remain with 
		the studio  
		through the 1950s. Hope's regular appearances in Hollywood 
		films and radio made 
 him one of the best known entertainers in North 
		America, and at the height of his  
		career he was also making a large 
		income from live concert performances. 
		
		As a movie star, he was best known for 
		
		My Favorite Brunette and the highly 
		 
		successful 
		
		"Road" movies in which he starred with
		
		
		Bing Crosby and
		
		
		Dorothy  
		
		Lamour. Hope had seen Lamour as a nightclub singer in New 
		York, and invited  
		her to work on his 
		
		USO tours. Lamour is said to have arrived for filming prepared 
 with 
		her lines, only to be baffled by completely re-written scripts from 
		Hope's  
		writers without studio permission. Hope and Lamour were lifelong 
		friends, and she 
 is the actress most associated with his film career. 
		 
		 
		In October 1956, Hope appeared on an episode of the most-viewed 
		program in  
		America at the time, 
		
		I 
		Love Lucy. He said, upon receiving the script: "What? 
		 
		A script? 
		I don't need one of these"[cite 
		this quote], and ad-libbed the entire episode.
		 
		
		
		Desi Arnaz said of Hope after his appearance: "Bob is a very nice 
		man, he can  
		crack you up, no matter how much you try for him to not."[cite 
		this quote] Lucy 
		 
		and Desi returned the favor by appearing 
		on one of his Chevy Show specials (with
		 
		
		
		Vivian Vance and
		
		
		William Frawley) later that season. 
		Hope's 1970 and 1971 Christmas specials for NBC—filmed in
		
		
		Vietnam 
		in front of  
		military audiences at the height of the war—are on the list 
		of the 
		
		Top 30 U.S. Network  
		
		Primetime Telecasts of All Time. Both were seen 
		by more than 60% of the U.S. 
 households watching television. 
		In 1992, Bob Hope made a guest appearance as himself on 
		
		
		The Simpsons, in the episode 
		 
		"Lisa 
		the Beauty Queen" (season 4, episode 4). The episode attracted 11.1 
		million  
		viewers when it premiered on October 15. His final television 
		special, Laughing with  
		the Presidents, was broadcast in 1996, 
		with
		
		
		Tony Danza helping Hope present a 
		 
		personal retrospective of 
		
		presidents of the United States known to the comedian. 
		 USO
		For more on this topic see
		
		USO – Honoring Bob Hope 
		
			
				 
					
						 
					Bob Hope's 1966 Christmas Show at Nakhon Phanom, Thailand 
			 
		 
		
		
		  
		his first 
		
		
		United  
		
		Service Organizations (USO) show on May 6, 1941, at
		
		
		March Field, 
 California. He continued to travel and entertain troops 
		for the rest of World War II  
		and later during the
		
		
		Korean War, the
		
		
		Vietnam War, the third phase of the
		
		
		Lebanon 
		
		 Civil War, the latter years of the
		
		
		Iran–Iraq War, and the 1990–1991
		
		
		Persian 
		Gulf War. 
 When overseas he almost always performed in Army 
		
		fatigues as a show of support for 
		 
		his audience. Hope's USO career 
		lasted half a century, during which he headlined  
		approximately 60 tours. 
		For his service to his country through the USO, he was 
 awarded the 
		
		Sylvanus Thayer Award by the
		
		
		United States Military Academy at 
 West Point in 1968. 
		Of Hope's USO shows in World War II, writer
		
		
		John Steinbeck, who was then working 
 as a war correspondent, wrote 
		in 1943: 
		
			
				| 
				“ | 
				
				 When the time for recognition of service to the nation in 
				wartime comes to be  
				considered, Bob Hope should be high on the 
				list. This man drives himself and is 
 driven. It is impossible to 
				see how he can do so much, can cover so much ground,  
				can work so 
				hard, and can be so effective. He works month after month at a 
				pace 
 that would kill most people. 
				 | 
				
				” | 
			 
		 
		A 1997 act of
		
		
		Congress signed by
		
		
		President Clinton named Hope an "Honorary Veteran." 
 He remarked, 
		"I've been given many awards in my lifetime — but to be numbered 
		 
		among 
		the men and women I admire most — is the greatest honor I have ever 
		received." 
		Hope appeared in so many theaters of war over the decades that it was 
		often cracked  
		(in Bob Hope style) that "Where there's death, there's 
		Hope". 
		In 2009,
		
		
		Stephen Colbert carried a golf club on stage each night during his 
		own week- 
		long USO performance and taping of 
		
		The Colbert Report[17] 
		and explained in his last 
 episode that it was an homage to Hope. 
		Theater
		Hope's first Broadway appearances, in 1927's The Sidewalks of New 
		York and 1928's 
 Ups-a-Daisy, were minor walk-on parts. 
		He returned to Broadway in 1933 to star 
 as Huckleberry Haines in the 
		
		Jerome Kern/Dorothy 
		Fields musical 
		
		Roberta. 
		Stints in  
		the musicals 
		
		Say 
		When, the 1936
		
		
		Ziegfeld Follies (with
		
		
		Fanny Brice), and 
		
		
		Red, Hot and 
		
		 Blue with
		
		
		Ethel Merman and
		
		
		Jimmy Durante followed. His performances were generally 
		 
		well-received and critics noted his keen sense of comedic timing. Hope 
		reprised his role  
		as Huck Haines in a 1958 production of Roberta 
		at  
		The 
		Muny Theater in
		
		
		Forest Park,
		 
		
		
		St. Louis, Missouri. 
		Hope rescued Eltham Little Theatre from closure by providing the 
		funds to buy the  
		property, he continued his interest and support and 
		regularly visited when in London. 
		The Theatre was renamed in his honor 
		in 1982. 
		[Sports
		Hope was an avid golfer. He was introduced to the game in the 1930s, 
		and eventually  
		played to a four 
		
		handicap. His love for the game, and the humor he could find in it, 
		 
		made him a much sought-after 
		
		foursome member. He once remarked that President 
 Dwight D. Eisenhower gave up golf for painting – "fewer strokes, you 
		know." 
		In 1978,  
		he putted against a then two-year-old 
		
		Tiger Woods in a television appearance on 
 The Mike Douglas Show. By the 1980s, a golf club became an integral
		
		
		prop for Hope 
 during the 
		
		stand-up segments of his television specials and USO Shows. 
		The
		
		
		Bob Hope Classic was founded in 1960, and is currently the only
		
		
		FedEx 
		Cup  
		tournament that takes place over five rounds. The tournament 
		made history in 1995, 
 when Hope teed up for the opening round in a 
		foursome that included Presidents 
 Gerald R. Ford,
		
		
		George H.W. Bush and
		
		
		Bill Clinton – the only time ever that three 
		 
		presidents participated 
		in a golf foursome. 
		Hope would frequently use his television specials to promote the 
		annual
		
		
		College  
		
		Football All-America Team. The team members would enter the 
		stage one by one  
		and introduce themselves, and Hope would then give a 
		one-liner about the player or  
		his school. Hope would often don a 
		football uniform for these presentations. 
		[Personal life
		[Marriages
		Hope's first wife was his vaudeville partner Grace Louise Troxell, 
		whom he married  
		on January 25, 1933. When the marriage record was 
		unearthed some years later,  
		Hope denied that the marriage had any 
		substance and said they had quickly divorced. 
 There were rumors that he 
		fathered a daughter with Troxell and that he continued to  
		send generous 
		cheques to her despite a widely documented reputation for 
		
		frugality.  
		In 1934 Bob Hope married 
		
		Dolores Reade, and adopted four children at The Cradle 
 in 
		
		Evanston, Illinois: Linda, Anthony, Kelly, and Nora.From them he had several 
		 
		grandchildren, including Andrew, Miranda, and 
		Zachary Hope. 
		Later years
		
		 As Hope entered his ninth decade, he showed no signs of slowing down 
		and 
 continued appearing in numerous television specials. He was given an 
		80th 
 birthday party in 1983 at the
		
		
		Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C. which 
		 
		was attended by President 
		Ronald Reagan. In 1985, he was presented with the  
		Life Achievement Award 
		at the
		
		
		Kennedy Center Honors. He was presented 
 with the
		
		
		Ronald Reagan Freedom Award in 1997 by
		
		
		Nancy Reagan.[23] 
		The  
		following year, Hope was appointed an honorary Knight Commander of 
		the  
		Most Excellent
		
		
		Order of the British Empire by
		
		
		Queen Elizabeth II. Upon 
		 
		accepting the appointment, Hope quipped, 
		"I'm speechless. 70 years of ad lib  
		material and I'm speechless". 
		
		  
		  
		  
		  
		  
		At the age of 95, Hope made an appearance at the 50th anniversary of 
		the
		 
		
		
		Primetime Emmy Awards with
		
		
		Milton Berle and
		
		
		Sid 
		Caesar. Two years later,  
		Hope was present at the opening of the Bob 
		Hope Gallery of American  
		Entertainment at the
		
		
		Library of Congress. The Library of Congress has 
		 
		immortalized Bob 
		Hope's life with two major exhibitions - 'Hope for America: 
 Performers, 
		Politics and Pop Culture' and 'Bob Hope and American Variety'. 
		Hope celebrated his 100th birthday on May 29, 2003. He is among a 
		small group  
		of notable
		
		
		centenarians in the field of
		
		
		entertainment, which include:
		
		
		Irving Berlin,
		 
		
		
		Hal 
		Roach,
		
		
		Senor Wences,
		
		
		George Abbott,
		
		
		Adolph Zukor,
		
		
		Barbara Kent, 
 Charles Lane,
		
		
		Luise Rainer,
		
		
		Gloria Stuart, and
		
		
		George Burns. To mark this 
 event, the intersection of
		
		
		Hollywood and Vine in Los Angeles, California was 
 named Bob Hope 
		Square and his centennial was declared Bob Hope Day in  
		35 
		states. Hope spent the day privately in his
		
		
		Toluca Lake, Los Angeles home 
 where he had lived since 1937. Even at 
		100, Hope was said to have maintained  
		his self-deprecating sense of 
		humor, quipping, "I'm so old, they've canceled my 
 blood type." 
		He converted to
		
		
		Roman Catholicism and was a devout Catholic. 
		 Death
		
		Hope had
		
		
		premature obituaries on two separate occasions. In 1998 a prepared 
 obituary by
		
		
		The Associated Press was inadvertently released on the Internet, 
 prompting Hope's death to be announced in the
		
		
		US House of Representatives] 
		 
		In 2003 he was among several famous figures whose pre-written obituaries 
		were  
		published on  
		CNN's website due to a lapse in password protection. 
		Beginning in 2000, Hope's health steadily declined and he was 
		hospitalized several  
		times before his death. In June 2000 he spent 
		nearly a week in a California hospital  
		after being hospitalized for
		
		
		gastrointestinal bleeding.In August 2001, he spent 
		 
		close to two weeks in the hospital recovering 
		from  
		pneumonia. 
		On July 27, 2003, Bob Hope died at his home in Toluca Lake at 9:28 
		p.m.  
		According to the Soledad O'Brien interview with Hope's grandson, 
		when asked  
		on his deathbed where he wanted to be buried, Hope told his 
		wife, "Surprise me 
		 
		 He was interred in the Bob Hope Memorial Garden at
		
		 
		
		
		San Fernando Mission Cemetery in Los Angeles, where his mother is 
		also buried. 
		
		 Short subjects
		
		[eBob Hope wrote or contributed to more than 15 books over his career.
		Honors
		
			- In 1962, Bob Hope was presented with the United States
			
			
			
			Congressional 
 
			
			Gold Medal. 
			- In 1969, President
			
			
			Lyndon Johnson bestowed the
			
			
			
			Presidential Medal of F
 
			
			reedom on Bob Hope for his service to the 
			men and women of the armed  
			forces through the
			
			
			USO. 
			- Inducted into the
			
			
			World Golf Hall of Fame in 1983.
 
			- He was a member of the
			
			
			National Association of Broadcasters Hall of Fame 
			
 
			in the radio 
			division. 
			- Knight Commander of the
			
			
			Order of St. Gregory the Great (KCSG) – 1989
 
			- In 1995, Bob Hope was presented with the
			
			
			National Medal of Arts.
 
			- Hope received the
			
			
			Ronald Reagan Freedom Award in 1997.[36]
 
			- Honorary
			
			
			Knight Commander of the
			
			
			Order of the British Empire 
			
 
			(KBE) – 1998 
			- Member of the
			
			
			Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels
 
			- One of the few non-members given the privilege of dotting the 
			'i' in the
			
			
			
			S
 
			
			cript Ohio routine performed by
			
			
			The Ohio State University Marching Band. 
			- The historic chapel at the
			
			
			Los Angeles National Cemetery was renamed as the 
			
 
			Bob Hope 
			Veterans Chapel on his 99th birthday, May 29, 2002 in "celebration 
			 
			of his lifelong service to our American Veterans". 
			- The
			
			
			Burbank, California, public airport was renamed
			
			
			Bob Hope Airport in 2003.
 
			- The historic
			
			
			Bob Hope Patriotic Hall building on
			
			
			Figueroa Street in
			
			
 
			
			
			Los Angeles County was named in his honor on August 3, 2003, by 
			the
			
			
			
			Board of  
			
			Supervisors. 
			- 
			
			USNS Bob Hope (T-AKR-300) of the U.S.
			
			
			Military Sealift Command was named 
			
 
			after the performer in 1997. 
			It is one of very few
			
			
			
			U.S. naval ships that were  
			
			named after living people. 
			- 
			
			The United States Air Force named a
			
			
			C-17 Globemaster III transport aircraft 
			
 
			after Hope, the 
			Spirit of Bob Hope. 
			- The dining facility at Camp Lemonier (Djibouti, Africa) is named 
			the Bob Hope 
 
			Galley. 
			- In 2008, the research library at the
			
			
			Ellis Island Immigration Museum was renamed
 
 by Congress with the 
			consent of the President, as the Bob Hope Memorial Library. 
			- For contributions to the live theater, radio, motion picture, 
			and television, Bob 
 
			Hope was honored with four stars on the
			
			
			Hollywood Walk of Fame. 
			- At the U.S. Naval Academy,
			
			
			Alumni Hall is home to the Bob Hope Performing 
			
 
			Arts Center. 
			- The
			
			
			Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in 
			Washington,
 
 D.C. has a wing funded by Dolores and Bob Hope in memory 
			of his mother. 
			It is 
 dedicated to a miracle in
			
			
			Pontmain,
			
			
			France. 
			- The municipal clock tower of
			
			
			Utica, New York is named the Tower of Hope in 
			
 
			honor of Bob Hope. 
			- In 2009, "A National Salute to Bob Hope and the Military" was 
			dedicated in
 
 San Diego, California. 
			- The 64th and only civilian recipient of the United States Air 
			Force "Order of 
 
			the Sword." The Order of the Sword recognizes 
			individuals who have made  
			significant contributions to the enlisted 
			corps. Presented June 10, 1980. 
		 
		 
		FRANK ZAPPA 
		Frank Vincent Zappa[1] 
		(pronounced
		
		
		
		/ˈzæpə/; December 21, 1940 – December 4, 1993) 
		 
		was an 
		American
		
		
		composer,
		
		
		electric guitarist, record producer, and
		
		
		film director. In 
 a career spanning more than 30 years, Zappa wrote
		
		
		rock,  
		jazz,
		
		
		electronic,
		
		
		orchestral,  
		and
		
		
		musique concrète works. He also directed feature-length films and
		
		
		music videos, a 
		nd designed album covers. Zappa produced almost all 
		of the more than 60 albums he 
		released with the band
		
		
		Mothers of Invention and as a solo artist. 
		While in his teens, he acquired a taste for percussion-based
		
		
		avant-garde composers 
		 
		such as
		
		
		Edgard Varèse and 1950s
		
		
		rhythm and blues music. He began writing classical 
		 
		music in high 
		school, while at the same time playing drums in rhythm and blues 
		bands 
		—he later switched to electric guitar. He was a self-taught 
		composer and performer, 
 and his diverse musical influences led him to 
		create music that was often impossible  
		to categorize. His 1966 debut 
		album with the Mothers of Invention, 
		
		Freak Out!,  
		combined songs in conventional rock and roll format 
		with collective imp 
		FRANK ZArovisations and studio-generated sound collages. His 
		later albums shared  
		this eclectic and experimental approach, 
		irrespective of whether the fundamental 
 format was one of rock, jazz or 
		classical. He wrote the lyrics to all his songs, which— 
		often 
		humorously—reflected his iconoclastic view of established social and 
		political  
		processes, structures and movements. He was a strident critic 
		of mainstream  
		education and
		
		
		organized religion, and a forthright and passionate advocate for 
 freedom of speech,
		
		
		autodidacticism and the abolition of
		
		
		censorship. 
		Zappa was a highly productive and prolific artist and he gained 
		widespread critical  
		acclaim. Many of his albums are considered essential 
		in rock and jazz history. He is  
		regarded as one of the most original 
		guitarists and composers of his time. He also 
 remains a major influence 
		on musicians and composers. He had some commercial 
 success, particularly 
		in Europe, and for most of his career was able to work as an  
		independent 
		artist. Zappa was posthumously inducted into the
		
		
		
		Rock and Roll Hall 
		
		 of Fame in 1995 and received the
		
		
		Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award in 1997. 
		Zappa was married to Kathryn J. "Kay" Sherman from 1960 to 1964. In 
		1967 he 
		married
		
		
		Adelaide Gail Sloatman, with whom he remained until his death from
		 
		
		
		prostate cancer in 1993. They had four children:
		
		
		Moon Unit,
		
		
		Dweezil,
		
		 
		
		
		Ahmet Emuukha Rodan and
		
		
		Diva Thin Muffin Pigeen. Gail Zappa manages the 
 businesses of her 
		late husband under the name the Zappa Family Trust. 
		 Early life
		Frank Zappa was born in
		
		
		Baltimore, Maryland, on December 21, 1940. His mother, 
 Rose Marie 
		(née Colimore), was of
		
		
		Italian and
		
		
		French descent, and his father, 
		 
		Francis Vincent Zappa, was a native 
		of  
		Partinico,
		
		
		Sicily 
		and had
		
		
		Greek and
		
		
		Arab  
		ancestry.Zappa was the eldest of four children, and had two brothers and a 
		sister. 
 The family moved often during Zappa's childhood because his father, a
		
		
		
		chemist 
		 
		 and
		
		
		mathematician, had various jobs in the US defense industry. After a 
		brief time 
 in
		
		
		Florida 
		in the mid-1940s, the family returned to
		
		
		Maryland, where Zappa's father 
 worked at the
		
		
		Edgewood Arsenal
		
		
		chemical warfare facility at the
		
		
		
		Aberdeen Proving  
		
		Ground. Due to their home's proximity to the 
		arsenal, which stored
		
		
		mustard gas, 
 gas masks were kept in the house in case of an 
		accident.[4] 
		This had a profound  
		effect on the young Zappa: references to germs, germ 
		warfare and other aspects of 
 the defense industry occur throughout his 
		work. 
		During his childhood Zappa was often sick, suffering from
		
		
		asthma,
		
		
		earaches 
		and
		
		
		sinus  
		problems. A doctor treated the latter by inserting a pellet of
		
		
		radium 
		into each of 
 Zappa's nostrils; little was known at the time about the 
		potential dangers of being  
		subjected to even small amounts of 
		therapeutic radiation] 
		Nasal imagery and  
		references appear both in his music and lyrics, as 
		well as in the collage album covers 
 created by his long-time visual 
		collaborator,
		
		
		Cal Schenkel. 
		Many of Zappa's childhood diseases may have arisen from exposure to 
		mustard gas;  
		furthermore, his health worsened when he lived in the
		
		
		Baltimore area.] 
		In 1952, his  
		family relocated mainly because of Zappa's health.[7] 
		They next moved to
		
		 
		
		
		Monterey, California, where Zappa's father taught
		
		
		metallurgy at the
		
		 
		
		
		Naval Postgraduate School. Shortly afterward, they moved to
		
		
		Claremont, then to 
 El Cajon before finally moving to
		
		
		San Diego. 
		 
		
		 Musical influenc
		ote: "Since I didn't have any kind of formal training, it didn't make 
              
		any difference in me if I was listening to Lightnin' Slim, or a 
              
		vocal group called the Jewels ..., or Webers, or Varese, or 
              
		Stravinsky.  To me it was all good music.  Frank Zappa - 1989
		Zappa joined his first band, The Ramblers, at
		
		
		Mission Bay High School in San Diego. 
		 
		He was the band's drummer. 
		About the same time his parents bought a phonograph,  
		which allowed him 
		to develop his interest in music, and to begin building his record 
 collection.
		
		R&B singles were early purchases, starting a large collection he 
		kept for  
		the rest of his life. 
		He was interested in sounds for their own sake, particularly the  
		sounds 
		of drums and other
		
		
		percussion instruments. By age 12, he had obtained a snare 
 drum and 
		began learning the basics of orchestral percussion. 
		Zappa's deep interest in  
		modern classical music began 
		when he read a 
		
		LOOK magazine article about the
		 
		
		
		Sam 
		Goody record store chain that lauded its ability to sell an LP as 
		obscure as The  
		Complete Works of Edgard Varèse, Volume One.The article described
		
		
		Varèse's 
		 
		percussion composition 
		
		
		Ionisation, produced by
		
		
		EMS Recordings, as "a weird 
 jumble of drums and other unpleasant 
		sounds". Zappa decided to seek out Varèse's 
 music. After searching for 
		over a year, Zappa found a copy (he noticed the LP 
 because of the "mad 
		scientist" looking photo of Varèse on the cover). Not having  
		enough 
		money with him, he persuaded the salesman to sell him the record at a 
		 
		discount] 
		Thus began his lifelong passion for Varèse's music and that of other 
		 
		modern classical composers. 
		Zappa grew up influenced by
		
		
		avant-garde composers such as Varèse, 
 Igor Stravinsky and
		
		
		Anton Webern, R&B and
		
		
		doo-wop 
		groups (particularly local
		 
		
		
		pachuco 
		groups), and modern jazz. His own heterogeneous ethnic background, and 
 the diverse social and cultural mix in and around greater Los Angeles, 
		were crucial 
 in the formation of Zappa as a practitioner of
		
		
		underground music and of his later 
 distrustful and openly critical 
		attitude towards "mainstream" social, political and  
		musical movements. 
		He frequently lampooned musical fads like
		
		
		psychedelia, 
 rock opera and
		
		
		disco.Television also exerted a strong influence, as demonstrated 
 by 
		quotations from show themes and advertising jingles found in his later 
		works. 
		[
		
		Youth and beginning of career (1955–1960)
		By 1956, the Zappa family had moved to
		
		
		Lancaster, a small
		
		
		aerospace and farming 
		 
		town in the
		
		
		Antelope Valley of the
		
		
		Mojave Desert close to
		
		
		Edwards Air Force Base, 
		 
		in northern
		
		
		Los Angeles County. Zappa's mother encouraged him in his musical 
		 
		interests. Although she disliked Varèse's music, she was indulgent 
		enough to give 
 her son a long distance call to the composer as a 15th 
		birthday present.U 
		nfortunately, Varèse was in Europe at the time, so Zappa spoke to the 
		composer's  
		wife. He later received a letter from Varèse thanking him for 
		his interest, and  
		telling him about a composition he was working on 
		called "Déserts". 
		Living in 
 the desert town of Lancaster, Zappa found this very exciting. 
		Varèse invited him 
 to visit if he ever came to New York. The meeting 
		never took place (Varèse died in  
		1965), but Zappa framed the letter and 
		kept it on display for the rest of his life. 
		At
		
		
		Antelope Valley High School, Zappa met Don Vliet (who later expanded 
		his 
 name to Don Van Vliet and adopted the stage name
		
		
		Captain Beefheart). Zappa 
		 
		and Vliet became close friends, sharing an 
		interest in R&B records and  
		influencing each other musically throughout 
		their careers. 
		Around the same time, Zappa started playing drums in a local band, 
		The Blackouts. 
 The band was racially diverse, and included
		
		
		Euclid James "Motorhead" Sherwood 
		 
		who later became a member of the 
		Mothers of Invention. Zappa's interest in the  
		guitar grew, and in 1957 
		he was given his first guitar. Among his early influences  
		were
		
		
		Johnny "Guitar" Watson,
		
		
		Howlin' Wolf and
		
		
		Clarence "Gatemouth" Brown. 
 (In the 1970s and '80s, he invited Watson to perform on several albums.) 
		Zappa  
		considered soloing as the equivalent of forming "air sculptures", 
		and developed an 
 eclectic, innovative and personal style. 
		Zappa's interest in composing and arranging proliferated in his last 
		high-school  
		years. By his final year, he was writing,
		
		
		arranging and
		
		
		conducting avant-garde 
 performance pieces for the school
		
		
		orchestra. 
		He graduated from Antelope Valley 
 High School in 1958, and later 
		acknowledged two of his music teachers on the 
 sleeve of the 1966 album
		Freak Out!Due to his family's frequent moves, Zappa 
		 
		attended at least six 
		different
		
		
		high schools, and as a student he was often bored 
 and given to 
		distracting the rest of the class with juvenile antics] 
		He left  
		community college after one semester, and maintained thereafter 
		a disdain for 
 formal education, taking his children out of school at age 
		15 and refusing to  
		pay for their college. 
		Zappa left home in 1959, and moved into a small apartment in
		
		
		Echo Park, Los 
		 
		Angeles. After meeting Kathryn J. "Kay" Sherman 
		during his short stay at 
 Pomona College, they moved in together in
		
		
		Ontario, and were married 
		 
		December 28, 1960. 
		Zappa worked for a short period in advertising. His sojourn  
		in the 
		commercial world was brief, but gave him valuable insights into how it 
		 
		works.Throughout his career, he took a keen interest in the visual 
		presentation  
		of his work, designing some of his album covers and 
		directing his own films and 
 videos. 
		[
		Early 1960s: Studio 
		Z
		Zappa attempted to earn a living as a musician and composer, and 
		played different 
 nightclub gigs, some with a new version of The 
		Blackouts.[28] 
		Financially more  
		rewarding were Zappa's earliest professional 
		recordings, two soundtracks for the 
 low-budget films 
		
		The World's Greatest Sinner (1962) and Run Home Slow 
		(1965). 
 The former score was commissioned by actor-producer
		
		
		Timothy Carey and 
		 
		recorded in 1961. It contains many themes that 
		appeared on later Zappa records] 
		 
		 The latter soundtrack was recorded in 1963 after the film was completed, 
		but it  
		was commissioned by one of Zappa's former high school teachers in 
		1959 and  
		Zappa may have worked on it before the film was shot. 
		Excerpts from the  
		soundtrack can be heard on the posthumous album 
		
		The Lost Episodes (1996). 
		During the early 1960s, Zappa wrote and produced songs for other 
		local artists, 
 often working with singer-songwriter
		
		
		Ray Collins and producer Paul Buff. 
		 
		Their "Memories of El Monte" was 
		recorded by
		
		
		The Penguins (although only 
 Cleve Duncan of the original group was 
		featured). 
		Buff owned the small
		 
		
		
		Pal Recording Studio in
		
		
		Cucamonga, which included a unique five-track tape 
		 
		recorder he had 
		built. At that time, only a handful of the most sophisticated 
 commercial 
		studios had
		
		
		multi-track facilities; the industry standard for smaller 
		 
		studios 
		was still mono or two-track. 
		Although none of the recordings from 
 the period achieved major 
		commercial success, Zappa earned enough money 
 to allow him to stage a 
		concert of his orchestral music in 1963 and to broadcast 
 and record it.[ 
		He appeared on
		
		
		Steve Allen's syndicated late night show the same year, in which 
 he 
		played a bicycle as a musical instrument.[34] 
		With Captain Beefheart, Zappa 
 recorded some songs under the name of The 
		Soots. They were rejected by 
 Dot Records for having no "commercial potential"; a quote Zappa 
		later used  
		on the sleeve of 
		
		Freak Out! 
		In 1964, after his marriage started to break up, he moved into the 
		Pal studio and  
		began routinely working 12 hours or more per day 
		recording and experimenting  
		with
		
		
		overdubbing and
		
		
		audio tape manipulation. This set a work pattern that 
 endured for 
		most of his life. 
		Aided by his income from film composing,  
		Zappa took over the studio from 
		Paul Buff, who was now working with 
 Art 
		Laboe at
		
		
		Original Sound. It was renamed Studio Z. 
		Studio Z was rarely 
 booked for recordings by other musicians. Instead, friends moved in, 
		notably  
		James "Motorhead" Sherwoo 
		Zappa started performing as guitarist with a
		 
		
		
		power trio, The Muthers, in local bars in order to support himself. 
		An article in the local press describing Zappa as "the Movie King of 
		Cucamonga" 
 prompted the local police to suspect that he was making
		
		
		pornographic films. 
		In 
 March 1965, Zappa was approached by a
		
		
		vice squad undercover officer, and 
 accepted an offer of $100 to 
		produce a suggestive audio tape for an alleged
		
		 
		
		
		stag party. Zappa and a female friend faked an erotic recording. 
		When Zappa  
		was about to hand over the tape, he was arrested, and the 
		police stripped the  
		studio of all recorded material. 
		The press was tipped beforehand, and next day's  
		The Daily Report 
		wrote that "Vice Squad investigators stilled the tape recorders 
 of a 
		free-swinging, a-go-go film and recording studio here Friday and 
		arrested  
		a self-styled movie producer"] 
		Zappa was charged with "conspiracy to commit  
		pornography". 
		This  
		felony 
		charge was reduced and he was sentenced to six  
		months in jail on a
		
		
		misdemeanor, with all but ten days suspended. 
		His entrapment  
		and brief imprisonment left a permanent mark, and was key 
		in the formation of his  
		anti-authoritarian stance.Zappa lost several recordings made at Studio Z in the 
 process, as the 
		police only returned 30 out of 80 hours of tape seized. 
		Eventually 
		, he could no longer afford to pay the rent on the studio and 
		was evicted. 
		Zappa  
		managed to recover some of his possessions before the studio was 
		torn down in 
 1966. 
		
		 Late 
		1960s: The Mothers of Invention
		In 1965, Zappa was approached by
		
		
		Ray Collins who asked him to join a local 
		 
		R&B band, The Soul Giants, 
		as a guitarist. 
		Zappa accepted, and soon he assumed  
		leadership and the role as co-lead 
		singer (even though he never considered himself 
 a singer). 
		He convinced the other members that they should play his music to 
		i 
		ncrease the chances of getting a record contract. 
		The band was renamed The  
		Mothers, coincidentally on
		
		
		Mother's Day. 
		The group increased their bookings 
 after beginning an association with 
		manager
		
		
		Herb Cohen, while they gradually 
 gained attention on the burgeoning 
		Los Angeles
		
		
		underground music scene. 
		In  
		early 1966, they were spotted by leading record producer
		
		
		Tom Wilson when 
		 
		playing "Trouble Every Day", a song about the
		
		
		Watts Riots. 
		Wilson had earned 
 acclaim as the producer for singer-songwriter
		
		
		Bob 
		Dylan and the folk-rock act
		 
		
		
		Simon & Garfunkel, and was notable as one of the few blacks working 
		as a major 
 label pop music producer at this time. 
		Wilson signed The Mothers to the
		
		
		Verve Records division of
		
		
		MGM Records, 
		 
		which had built up a strong reputation in the
		
		
		music industry for its releases of 
		 
		modern jazz recordings in the 
		1940s and 1950s, but was attempting to diversify 
		  into pop and rock 
		audiences. Verve insisted that the band officially re-title  
		themselves "The 
		Mothers of Invention" because "Mother", in slang terminology, 
 was 
		short for "motherfucker"—a 
		term that apart from its profane meanings can  
		denote a skilled musician. 
		[edit]
		
		Debut album: Freak Out! (1966)
		With Wilson credited as producer, The Mothers of Invention and a 
		studio orchestra 
		recorded the groundbreaking double album 
		
		Freak Out! (1966). It mixed R&B,
		 
		
		
		doo-wop, 
		musique concrète, 
		and experimental
		
		
		sound collages that captured the 
		 
		"freak" subculture of Los Angeles 
		at that time. 
		The album immediately established  
		Zappa as a radical new voice in rock 
		music, providing an antidote to the "relentless 
 consumer culture of 
		America"] 
		The sound was raw, but the
		
		
		arrangements were s 
		ophisticated. (Some of the
		
		
		session musicians were shocked that they should read 
		 
		from
		
		
		charts with Zappa conducting them, as this was not standard at a 
		rock  
		recording.) 
		The lyrics praised non-conformity, disparaged authorities, and had 
 dadaist 
		elements. Yet, there was a place for seemingly conventional love songs] 
 Most compositions are Zappa's, which set a precedent for the rest of his 
		recording 
 career. He had full control over the arrangements and musical 
		decisions and did 
 most
		
		
		overdubs. Wilson provided the industry clout and connections to get 
		the 
 group the financial resources needed. 
		During the recording of Freak Out!, Zappa moved into a house 
		in
		
		
		Laurel Canyon 
		 
		with friend
		
		
		Pamela Zarubica, who appeared on the album. 
		The house became a 
 meeting (and living) place for many LA musicians and
		
		
		groupies 
		of the time, despite  
		Zappa's disapproval of their drug use. 
		He labeled people on drugs "assholes in  
		action", and he only tried
		
		
		cannabis a few times without any pleasure. 
		He was a 
 regular
		
		
		tobacco 
		smoker for most of his life, and strongly critical of anti-tobacco 
		 
		campaigns. 
		After a short promotional tour following the release of Freak Out!, 
		 
		Zappa met
		
		
		Adelaide Gail Sloatman. He fell in love within "a couple of 
		minutes", 
 and she moved into the house over the summer. 
		They married in 1967, had four 
		children and remained together until 
		Zappa's death. 
		Wilson produced the follow-up album 
		
		Absolutely Free (1967), which was 
		 
		recorded in November 1966, and 
		later
		
		
		mixed in New York. It featured extended 
 playing by the Mothers of 
		Invention and focused on songs that defined Zappa's 
 compositional style 
		of introducing abrupt, rhythmical changes into songs that  
		were built 
		from diverse elements. 
		Examples are "Plastic People" and "Brown  
		Shoes Don't Make It", which 
		contained lyrics critical of the hypocrisy and  
		conformity of American 
		society, but also of the
		
		
		counterculture of the 1960s. 
		As Zappa put it, "[W]e're satirists, and we are out to satirize 
		everything."At the 
 same time, Zappa had recorded material for a self-produced album 
		based on 
 orchestral works to be released under his own name. Due to 
		contractual  
		problems, the recordings were shelved and only made ready 
		for release late in  
		1967. Zappa took the opportunity to radically 
		restructure the contents, adding  
		newly recorded, improvised dialogue to 
		finalize what became his first solo  
		album (under the name Francis 
		Vincent Zappa),
		
		
		Lumpy Gravy (1968)] 
		It is an 
 "incredible ambitious musical project", 
		a "monument to
		
		
		John 
		Cage", 
		which  
		intertwines orchestral themes, spoken words and electronic noises 
		through 
 radical
		
		
		audio editing techniques. 
		 New York period (1966–1968)
		The Mothers of Invention played in New York in late 1966 and were 
		offered a  
		contract at the Garrick Theater during Easter 1967. This 
		proved successful and 
 Herb Cohen extended the booking, which eventually 
		lasted half a year. 
		As a  
		result, Zappa and his wife, along with the Mothers of Invention, 
		moved to New 
 York. 
		Their shows became a combination of improvised acts showcasing 
 individual talents of the band as well as tight performances of Zappa's 
		music.  
		Everything was directed by Zappa's famous hand signals. 
		Guest performers and  
		audience participation became a regular part of the 
		Garrick Theater shows. 
 One evening, Zappa managed to entice some US 
		Marines from the audience onto 
 the stage, where they proceeded to 
		dismember a big baby doll, having been told 
 by Zappa to pretend that it 
		was a "gook 
		baby". 
		Situated in New York, and only interrupted by the band's first 
		European tour,  
		the Mothers of Invention recorded the album widely 
		regarded as the peak of the 
 group's late 1960s work, 
		
		We're Only in It for the Money (released 1968). 
		It  
		was produced by Zappa, with Wilson credited as executive producer. 
		From then 
 on, Zappa produced all albums released by the Mothers of 
		Invention and as a  
		solo artist. We're Only in It for the Money 
		featured some of the most creative  
		audio editing and production yet 
		heard in pop music, and the songs ruthlessly  
		satirized the
		
		
		hippie 
		and
		
		
		flower power phenomena.[75] 
		The cover photo parodied  
		that of
		
		
		The Beatles' 
		
		
		Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.[76] 
		The cover art  
		was provided by
		
		
		Cal Schenkel whom Zappa met in New York. This initiated a 
		 
		life-long 
		collaboration in which Schenkel designed covers for numerous Zappa  
		and 
		Mothers albums. 
		Reflecting Zappa's eclectic approach to music, the next album, 
		
		
		
		Cruising with 
		
		 Ruben & the Jets (1968), was very different. It 
		represented a collection of
		 
		
		
		doo-wop 
		songs; listeners and critics were not sure whether the album was a 
		 
		satire or a tribute. 
		Zappa has noted that the album was conceived in the way  
		Stravinsky's 
		compositions were in his neo-classical period: "If he could take 
		 
		the 
		forms and clichés of the classical era and pervert them, why not do the 
		same  
		... to doo-wop in the fifties?" 
		A theme from Stravinsky's 
		
		The Rite of Spring is 
		 
		heard during one song. 
		In New York, Zappa increasingly used
		
		
		tape editing as a compositional tool. 
		A  
		prime example is found on the double album 
		
		Uncle Meat (1969), 
		where the track  
		"King Kong" is edited from various studio and live 
		performances. Zappa had  
		begun regularly recording concerts, 
		and because of his insistence on precise
		 
		
		
		tuning and timing, he was able to augment his studio productions 
		with excerpts  
		from live shows, and vice versa. 
		Later, he combined recordings of different  
		compositions into new pieces, 
		irrespective of the
		
		
		tempo or
		
		
		meter of the sources. 
		 
		He dubbed this process "xenochrony" 
		(strange synchronizations 
		)—reflecting the Greek "xeno" (alien or strange) and "chrono" (time). 
		Zappa  
		also evolved a compositional approach which he called "conceptual 
		continuity,"  
		meaning that any project or album was part of a larger 
		project. Everything  
		was connected, and musical themes and lyrics 
		reappeared in different form on 
 later albums. Conceptual continuity 
		clues are found throughout Zappa's entire 
 œuvre. 
		During the late 1960s, Zappa continued to develop the business sides 
		of his career 
		. He and Herb Cohen formed the
		
		
		Bizarre Records and
		
		
		Straight Records labels, 
		 
		distributed by
		
		
		Warner Bros. Records, as ventures to aid the funding of projects 
		 
		and 
		to increase creative control. Zappa produced the double album 
		
		
		Trout Mask  
		
		Replica for
		
		
		Captain Beefheart, and releases by
		
		
		Alice Cooper,
		
		
		Wild Man Fischer, 
 and
		
		
		The 
		GTOs, as well as
		
		
		Lenny Bruce's last live performance. 
		
		 Disbanding the original Mothers of Invention (1969)
		
		Zappa and the Mothers of Invention returned to Los Angeles in the 
		summer of  
		1968, and the Zappas moved into a house on Laurel Canyon 
		Boulevard, only to  
		move again to one on Woodrow Wilson Drive in the 
		autumn.[89] 
		This was to be  
		Zappa's home for the rest of his life. Despite being a 
		success with fans in Europe,  
		the Mothers of Invention were not faring 
		well financially.Their first records were 
		 
		vocally oriented, but Zappa wrote more 
		instrumental jazz and classical oriented  
		music for the band's concerts, 
		which confused audiences. Zappa felt that 
 audiences failed to appreciate 
		his "electrical chamber music". 
		
			
				
				 
				
					
					Zappa in Paris, early 1970s 
			 
		 
		In 1969 there were nine band members and Zappa 
		 
		was supporting the 
		group himself from his publishing 
 royalties whether they played or not. 
		In late 1969,  
		Zappa broke up the band. He often cited the financial 
 strain as the main reason, 
		but also commented on the 
 band members' lack of sufficient effort. 
		Many band  
		members were bitter about Zappa's decision, and some 
 took it 
		as a sign of Zappa's preference for perfection  
		over feelings] 
		Others were irritated by "his
		
		
		autocratic  
		ways", 
		which was manifested by the fact that Zappa 
 never stayed at the same 
		hotel as the band members. 
 Several members would, however, play for Zappa in  
		years to come. 
		Remaining recordings with the band from this period were  
		collected on 
		
		Weasels Ripped My Flesh and 
		
		
		Burnt Weeny Sandwich (both 
		 
		released in 1970). 
		After he disbanded the Mothers of Invention, Zappa released the 
		acclaimed solo 
 album 
		
		Hot 
		Rats (1969). 
		It features, for the first time on record, Zappa playing 
 extended guitar 
		solos and contains one of his most enduring compositions,  
		"Peaches 
		en Regalia", which reappeared several times on future recordings.It 
		 
		was backed by jazz, blues and R&B session players including violinist
		
		
		
		Don " 
		
		Sugarcane" Harris, drummers John Guerin and
		
		
		Paul Humphrey, multi- 
		instrumentalist and previous member of Mothers 
		of Invention
		
		
		Ian Underwood, 
		 
		and multi-instrumentalist
		
		
		Shuggie Otis on bass, along with a guest appearance 
 by Captain 
		Beefheart (providing vocals to the only non-instrumental track,  
		"Willie 
		the Pimp"). It became a popular album in England] 
		and had a major  
		influence on the development of the
		
		
		jazz-rock fusion genre. 
		
		1970s: From the Mothers to Zappa
		In 1970 Zappa met conductor
		
		
		Zubin Mehta. They arranged a May 1970 concert 
		 
		where Mehta conducted 
		the
		
		
		Los Angeles Philharmonic augmented by a rock 
		 
		band. According to 
		Zappa, the music was mostly written in motel rooms while  
		on tour with 
		the Mothers of Invention. Some of it was later featured in the movie
		 
		
		
		200 
		Motels. 
		Although the concert was a success, Zappa's experience working  
		with a 
		symphony orchestra was not a happy one. 
		His dissatisfaction became a  
		recurring theme throughout his career, 
		where he often felt that the money spent 
 on performances of his 
		classical music rarely matched the final product. 
		 Rebirth of the Mothers and film making (1970)
		
		Later in 1970, Zappa formed a new version of The Mothers (from then 
		on, he  
		mostly dropped the "of Invention"). It included British drummer
		
		
		
		Aynsley  
		
		Dunbar, jazz keyboardist
		
		
		George Duke, Ian Underwood,
		
		
		Jeff Simmons (bass, 
 rhythm guitar), and three members of
		
		
		The Turtles: bass player
		
		
		Jim 
		Pons, and 
 singers
		
		
		Mark Volman and
		
		
		Howard Kaylan, who, due to persistent legal and 
		 
		contractual 
		problems, adopted the stage name "The Phlorescent Leech and  
		Eddie", or "Flo 
		& Eddie". 
		This version of the Mothers debuted on Zappa's next solo album 
		
		 
		
		
		Chunga's Revenge (1970)] 
		which was followed by the double-album soundtrack 
 to the movie 200 
		Motels (1971), featuring The Mothers,  
		The
		
		
		Royal Philharmonic Orchestra,
		
		
		Ringo Starr,
		
		
		Theodore Bikel, and
		
		
		Keith Moon. 
 Co-directed by Zappa and
		
		
		Tony Palmer, it was filmed in a week at
		 
		
		
		Pinewood Studios outside London. 
		Tensions between Zappa and several cast and 
 crew members arose before 
		and during shooting;] 
		co-director Palmer tried  
		afterwards to have his name removed from the 
		film. 
		The film deals loosely with 
 life on the road as a rock musician.It was the first feature film photographed 
		 
		on
		
		
		videotape and transferred to
		
		
		35 mm film, a process which allowed for novel 
 visual effects] 
		It was released to mixed reviews. 
		The score relied extensively on 
 orchestral music, and Zappa's 
		dissatisfaction with the classical music world  
		intensified when a 
		concert, scheduled at the
		
		
		Royal Albert Hall after filming, 
		 
		was canceled because a 
		representative of the venue found some of the lyrics  
		obscene. In 1975, 
		he lost a lawsuit against the Royal Albert Hall for breach of 
 contract. 
		After 200 Motels, the band went on tour, which resulted in two 
		live albums, 
		 
		
		
		Fillmore East - June 1971 and 
		
		
		Just Another Band From L.A.; the latter 
		 
		included the 20-minute 
		track "Billy 
		the Mountain", Zappa's satire on rock 
 opera set in Southern 
		California. This track was representative of the band's  
		theatrical 
		performances in which songs were used to build up sketches  
		based on 
		200 Motels scenes as well as new situations often portraying the 
		 
		band members' sexual encounters on the road. 
		
		
		Accident, attack and their aftermath (1971–1972)
		
		
		In December 1971, there were two serious setbacks. While performing 
		at 
 Casino de Montreux in Switzerland, the Mothers' equipment was 
		destroyed  
		when a flare set off by an audience member started a fire that 
		burned down  
		the casino. 
		Immortalized in
		
		
		Deep Purple's song "Smoke 
		on the Wat 
		, the event and immediate aftermath can be heard on the 
		bootleg album Swiss  
		Cheese/Fire, released legally as part of 
		Zappa's 
		
		Beat the Boots II compilation. 
 After a week's break, The Mothers 
		played at the
		
		
		Rainbow Theatre, London, 
		 
		with rented gear. During the encore, an 
		audience member pushed Zappa off  
		the stage and into the concrete-floored 
		orchestra pit. The band thought Zappa 
 had been killed—he had suffered 
		serious fractures, head trauma and injuries  
		to his back, leg, and neck, 
		as well as a crushed
		
		
		larynx, 
		which ultimately caused 
 his voice to drop a
		
		
		third after healing. 
		This left him wheelchair bound, forcing  
		him off the road for over half a 
		year. Upon his return to the stage in September 
 1972, he was still 
		wearing a leg brace, had a noticeable limp and could not stand 
 for very 
		long while on stage. Zappa noted that one leg healed "shorter than the 
		 
		other" (a reference later found in the lyrics of songs "Zomby Woof" and 
		 
		"Dancin' Fool"), resulting in chronic back pain 
		Meanwhile, the Mothers were left in limbo and eventually formed the 
		core of 
 Flo and Eddie's band as they set out on their own. 
		During 1971–1972 Zappa released two strongly jazz-oriented solo LPs,
		
		 
		
		
		Waka/Jawaka and 
		
		
		The Grand Wazoo, which were recorded during the forced 
 layoff 
		from concert touring, using floating line-ups of session players and 
		Mothers 
 alumni. 
		Musically, the albums were close to that of Hot Rats.[112] 
		Zappa began 
 touring again in late 1972. 
		His first effort was a series of concerts in September  
		1972 with a 
		20-piece
		
		
		big 
		band referred to as the Grand Wazoo. This was followed 
		 
		by a 
		scaled-down version known as the Petit Wazoo that toured the US for five 
		 
		weeks from October to December 1972. 
		[edit]
		Top 
		10 album (1973–1975)
		Zappa then formed and toured with smaller groups that variously 
		included
		 
		
		
		Ian Underwood (reeds, keyboards),
		
		
		Ruth Underwood (vibes, marimba), Sal 
		 
		Marquez (trumpet, vocals),
		
		
		Napoleon Murphy Brock (sax, flute and vocals),
		
		 
		
		
		Bruce Fowler (trombone),
		
		
		Tom Fowler (bass),
		
		
		Chester Thompson (drums), 
 Ralph Humphrey (drums), George Duke (keyboards, vocals), and
		
		 
		
		
		Jean-Luc Ponty (violin). 
		
		By 1973 the Bizarre and Straight labels were discontinued. In their 
		place,  
		Zappa and Cohen created
		
		
		DiscReet Records, also distributed by Warner Bros. 
 Zappa continued a high rate of production through the first half of the 
		1970s, i 
		ncluding the solo album 
		
		Apostrophe (') (1974), which reached a career-high #10 
		 
		on the
		
		
		Billboard pop album charts 
		helped by the chart single "Don't Eat The  
		Yellow Snow] 
		Other albums from the period are 
		
		Over-Nite Sensation (1973), 
		 
		which contained several future 
		concert favorites, such as "Dinah-Moe Humm" 
 and "Montana", 
		and the albums 
		
		Roxy & Elsewhere (1974) and 
		
		
		One Size Fits All 
		 
		(1975) which feature ever-changing versions of 
		a band still called the Mothers,  
		and are notable for the tight 
		renditions of highly difficult
		
		
		jazz fusion songs in s 
		uch pieces as "Inca 
		Roads", "Echidna's Arf (Of You)" and "Be-Bop Tango (Of 
		 
		the Old 
		Jazzmen's Church)". 
		A live recording from 1974, 
		
		
		You Can't Do That on S 
		
		tage Anymore, Vol. 2 (1988), captures "the 
		full spirit and excellence of the  
		1973–75 band". 
		Zappa released 
		
		Bongo Fury (1975), which featured live 
		 
		recordings from a tour 
		the same year that reunited him with
		
		
		Captain Beefheart 
		 
		for a brief period. 
		They later became estranged for a period of years, but were  
		in contact 
		at the end of Zappa's life.[edit]
		
		Business breakups and touring 
 (1976–1979) 
		
		Zappa's relationship with long-time manager Herb Cohen ended in 1976. 
		Zappa  
		sued Cohen for skimming more than he was allocated from DiscReet 
		Records,  
		as well as for signing acts of which Zappa did not approve. 
		Cohen filed a  
		lawsuit against Zappa in return, which froze the money 
		Zappa and Cohen had 
 gained from an out-of-court settlement with MGM over 
		the rights of the early 
 Mothers of Invention recordings. It also 
		prevented Zappa access to any of his 
 previously recorded material during 
		the trials. Zappa therefore took his  
		personal master copies of the 
		rock-oriented 
		
		Zoot Allures (1976) directly to
		
		 
		
		
		Warner Bros., thereby bypassing DiscReet. 
		In the mid-1970s Zappa prepared material for 
		
		
		Läther 
		(pronounced "leather"),  
		a four-LP project. Läther encapsulated 
		all the aspects of Zappa's musical styles 
		—rock tunes, orchestral works, 
		complex instrumentals, and Zappa's own  
		trademark distortion-drenched 
		guitar solos. Wary of a quadruple-LP, Warner 
 Bros. Records refused to 
		release it. 
		Zappa managed to get an agreement with
		
		 
		
		
		Mercury-Phonogram, and test pressings were made targeted at a 
		Halloween  
		1977 release, but Warner Bros. prevented the release by 
		claiming rights over  
		the material. 
		Zappa responded by appearing on the
		
		
		Pasadena, California radio 
 station
		
		
		KROQ, allowing them to broadcast Läther and encouraging 
		listeners to  
		make their own tape recordings. 
		A lawsuit between Zappa and Warner Bros. 
 followed, during which no Zappa 
		material was released for more than a year.  
		Eventually, Warner Bros. 
		issued major parts of Läther against Zappa's will as  
		four 
		individual albums with limited
		
		
		promotion.
		Läther was released  
		posthumously in 1996. 
		Although Zappa eventually gained the rights to all his material 
		created under  
		the MGM and Warner Bros. contracts, 
		the various lawsuits meant that for a  
		period Zappa's only income came 
		from touring, which he therefore did extensively 
 in 1975–1977 with 
		relatively small, mainly rock-oriented, bands. 
		Drummer
		
		 
		
		
		Terry Bozzio became a regular band member, Napoleon Murphy Brock 
		stayed on 
 for a while, and original Mothers of Invention bassist
		
		
		Roy Estrada joined. Among 
		 
		other musicians were bassist
		
		
		Patrick O'Hearn, singer-guitarist
		
		
		Ray 
		White and  
		keyboardist
		
		
		Eddie Jobson. In December 1976, Zappa appeared as a featured 
		 
		musical 
		guest on the  
		NBC 
		television show 
		
		Saturday Night Live.The 
		 
		performances included an impromptu musical collaboration with cast 
		member 
 John Belushi during the instrumental piece "The Purple Lagoon". 
		Belushi 
 appeared as his Samurai Futaba character playing the tenor sax 
		with Zappa  
		conducting. 
		Zappa's song, "I'm the Slime", was performed with a voice-over by 
 SNL 
		booth announcer
		
		
		Don 
		Pardo, who also introduced "Peaches En Regalia" 
		 
		on the same airing. 
		
		Zappa's band at the time, with the additions of Ruth U 
		nderwood and a 
		horn section (featuring
		
		
		Michael and 
 Randy Brecker), performed during Christmas in New 
		 
		York, recordings 
		of which appear on one of the albums  
		released by Warner Bros., 
		
		Zappa in New York (1978). 
		 
		It mixes intense instrumentals such as 
		"The 
		Black Page" 
 and humorous songs like "Titties and Beer".The former 
 composition, written originally for
		
		
		drum 
		kit but later 
 developed for larger bands, is notorious for its 
		complexity in rhythmic structure, 
 radical changes of tempo and meter, 
		and short, densely arranged passages 
		Zappa in New York featured a song about sex criminal
		
		
		Michael H. Kenyon, 
		 
		"The Illinois Enema Bandit", which featured Don 
		Pardo providing the opening  
		narrative in the song. Like many songs on 
		the album, it contained numerous sexual  
		references, 
		leading to many critics objecting and being offended by the content. 
 Zappa dismissed the criticism by noting that he was a journalist 
		reporting on life 
 as he saw it. 
		Predating his later fight against censorship, he remarked: "What 
		 
		 
		do you 
		make of a society that is so primitive that it clings to the belief that 
		certain  
		words in its language are so powerful that they could corrupt 
		you the moment 
 you hear them?" 
		The remaining albums released by Warner Bros. Records  
		without Zappa's 
		consent were 
		
		Studio Tan in 1978 and 
		
		
		Sleep Dirt in 1979, which 
		 
		contained complex suites of 
		instrumentally-based tunes recorded between 1973  
		and 1976, and which was 
		overlooked in the midst of the legal problems. 
		Also  
		released by the label without the artist's consent was 
		
		Orchestral Favorites in 
		 
		1979, which featured recordings of a 
		concert with orchestral music from 1975. 
		[edit]
		
		Zappa as an independent artist (1979)
		
		Resolving the lawsuits successfully, Zappa ended the 1970s "stronger 
		than ever"  
		by releasing two of his most successful albums in 1979: the best selling 
		album of 
 his career, 
		
		Sheik Yerbouti, 
		and the "bona fide masterpiece",
		
		Joe's Garage. 
		The  
		double album Sheik Yerbouti was the first release on
		
		
		Zappa Records, and 
		 
		contained the
		
		
		Grammy-nominated single "Dancin' Fool", which reached #45 
 on the 
		Billboard charts,and "Jewish Princess", which received attention when 
		 
		a Jewish lobby 
		group, the
		
		
		Anti-Defamation League (ADL), attempted to prevent 
 the song from 
		receiving radio airplay due to its alleged
		
		
		anti-Semitic lyrics. 
		Zappa 
 vehemently denied any anti-Semitic sentiments and dismissed the 
		ADL as a  
		"noisemaking organization that tries to apply pressure on 
		people in order to  
		manufacture a stereotype image of Jews that suits 
		their idea of a good time" 
		The 
 album's commercial success was attributable in part to "Bobby 
		Brown". Due to 
 its explicit lyrics about a young man's encounter 
		with a "dyke by the name of  
		Freddie", the song did not get airplay in 
		the US, but it topped the charts in several 
 European countries where 
		English is not the primary language.The triple LP 
		 
		Joe's Garage featured lead singer
		
		
		Ike 
		Willis as the voice of the character "Joe" in 
 a
		
		
		rock opera about the danger of
		
		
		political systems, 
		the suppression of 
 freedom of speech and music—inspired in part by the
		
		
		Islamic revolution that 
 had made music illegal within its 
		jurisdiction at the time—and 
		about the  
		"strange relationship Americans have with sex and sexual 
		frankness". 
		The album  
		contains rock songs like "Catholic Girls" (a
		
		
		riposte 
		to the controversies of  
		"Jewish Princess"), 
		"Lucille Has Messed My Mind Up", and the title track, as 
 well as 
		extended live-recorded guitar improvisations combined with a studio 
		 
		backup band dominated by drummer
		
		
		Vinnie Colaiuta (with whom Zappa had a 
 particularly good musical 
		rapport) 
		adopting the
		
		
		xenochrony process. The 
		 
		album contains one of Zappa's most famous 
		guitar "signature pieces",  
		"Watermelon in Easter Hay". 
		On December 21, 1979, Zappa's movie 
		
		Baby Snakes premiered in New York. 
		 
		The movie's tagline was "A 
		movie about people who do stuff that is not normal". 
 The 2 hour and 40 minutes movie was based on footage from concerts in 
		New 
 York around Halloween 1977. It also contained several extraordinary 
		sequences  
		of 
		
		clay animation by
		
		
		Bruce Bickford who had earlier provided animation sequences 
 to Zappa 
		for a 1974 TV special (which later become available on the video 
		 
		
		
		The Dub Room Special (1982)).] 
		The movie did not do well in theatrical distribution, 
 but won the Premier Grand Prix at the First International Music Festival 
		in Paris in  
		1981. The Zappa Family Trust released it on DVD, and it has 
		been available since  
		2003. 
		Zappa later expanded on his television appearances in a non-musical 
		role. He was 
 an actor or voice artist in episodes of 
		
		Shelley Duvall's Faerie Tale Theatre,
		
		
		Miami  
		
		Vice 
		and 
		
		The Ren and Stimpy Show] 
		A voice part in 
		
		The Simpsons never 
		 
		materialized, to creator
		
		
		Matt Groening's disappointment 
		1980s: 
		Productive as ever
		
			
		After spending most of 1980 on the road, Zappa released 
		
		
		Tinsel Town Rebellion in 
		 
		1981. It was the first release on his 
		own
		
		
		Barking Pumpkin Records, 
		and it  
		contains songs taken from a 1979 tour, one studio track and 
		material from the  
		1980 tours. The album is a mixture of complicated 
		instrumentals and Zappa's use 
 of 
		
		sprechstimme (speaking song or voice)—a compositional technique 
		utilized by 
 such composers as
		
		
		Arnold Schoenberg and
		
		
		Alban Berg—showcasing some of the 
		 
		most accomplished bands Zappa ever 
		had (mostly featuring drummer
		
		
		
		Vinnie  
		
		Colaiuta). 
		While some lyrics still raised controversy among critics, in the sense 
 that some found them sexist, 
		the political and sociological satire in songs like the  
		title track and 
		"The Blue Light" have been described as a "hilarious critique of the 
 willingness of the American people to believe anything".[155] 
		The album is also  
		notable for the presence of guitar
		
		
		virtuoso
		
		Steve 
		Vai, who joined Zappa's touring 
		 
		band in the fall of 1980. 
		The same year the double album 
		
		You Are What You Is was released. Most of it was 
 recorded in 
		Zappa's brand new
		
		
		Utility Muffin Research Kitchen (UMRK) studios, 
		 
		which were located 
		at his house, 
		thereby giving him complete freedom to work. 
		The  
		album included one complex instrumental, "Theme from the 3rd 
		Movement of 
 Sinister Footwear", but focused mainly on rock songs with 
		Zappa's sardonic social 
 commentary—satirical lyrics targeted at 
		teenagers, the media, and religious and  
		political hypocrisy. 
		"Dumb All Over" is a tirade on religion, as is "Heavenly Bank 
		 
		Account", 
		wherein Zappa rails against
		
		
		TV evangelists such as
		
		
		Jerry Falwell and 
 Pat Robertson for their purported influence on the US administration 
		as well as 
 their use of religion as a means of raising money] 
		Songs like "Society Pages"  
		and "I'm a Beautiful Guy" show Zappa's dismay 
		with the /span>
		
		Reaganite era and its 
		 
				"obscene pursuit of wealth and happiness". 
		
			
				| 
				
				 | 
				
				
					
					
					
						The title track on Shut Up 'N Play Yer Guitar 
						features Zappa's guitar improvisations. 
				 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| 
				  | 
			 
		 
		In 1981, Zappa also released three instrumental albums, 
		 
		
		
		Shut Up 'N Play Yer Guitar, Shut Up 'N Play Yer Guitar 
 Some 
		More, and The Return of the Son of Shut Up 'N 
 Play Yer Guitar, 
		which were initially sold via mail  
		order, but later released through the
		
		
		CBS label due 
		to  
		popular demand. 
		The albums focus exclusively on  
				Frank Zappa as a guitar soloist, and the 
		tracks are 
 predominantly live recordings from 1979–1980; they 
 highlight 
		Zappa's improvisational skills with "beautiful  
		performances from the 
		backing group as well". 
		Another 
 guitar-only album, 
		
		Guitar, was released in 1988, and a 
		 
		third, 
		
		
		Trance-Fusion, which Zappa completed shortly before his death, 
		was released  
				in 2006. 
		
		
		From hit single to classical performances
		In May 1982, Zappa released 
		
		Ship Arriving Too Late to Save a Drowning Witch, 
		 
		which featured 
		his biggest selling single ever, the
		
		
		Grammy Award-nominated 
		song  
		"Valley 
		Girl" (topping out at #32 on the 
		
		
		Billboard charts). 
		In her improvised lyrics 
 to the song, Zappa's daughter
		
		
		Moon Unit satirized the vapid speech of teenage girls 
 from the
		
		
		San Fernando Valley, which popularized many "Valspeak" 
		expressions  
		such as "gag me with a spoon," "fer sure, fer sure," "grody" 
		(gross), and "barf out". 
 Most Americans who only knew Zappa from his few singles successes now 
		thought 
 of him as a person writing "novelty 
		songs", even though the rest of the album 
		 
		contained highly 
		challenging music. 
		Zappa was irritated by this 
		and never played 
 the song live. 
		In 1983, two different projects were released, beginning with 
		
		
		The Man From Utopia, 
 a rock-oriented work. The album is 
		eclectic, featuring the vocal-led "Dangerous  
				Kitchen" and "The Jazz 
		Discharge Party Hats", both continuations of the 
 sprechstimme excursions 
		on Tinseltown Rebellion. The second album, 
		
		
		London 
		
		 Symphony Orchestra, Vol. 1, contained orchestral Zappa 
		compositions conducted 
 by
		
		
		Kent Nagano and performed by the
		
		
		London Symphony Orchestra. A second 
		 
		record of these sessions, 
		
		
		London Symphony Orchestra, Vol. 2 was released in 1987. 
 The 
		material was recorded under a tight schedule with Zappa providing all 
		funding 
		, helped by the commercial success of "Valley Girl". 
		Zappa was not satisfied with the 
 LSO recordings. One reason is "Strictly 
		Genteel", which was recorded after the 
 trumpet section had been out for 
		drinks on a break: the track took 40 edits to hide 
 out-of-tune notes. 
		Conductor Nagano, who was pleased with the experience, noted 
 that in 
		"fairness to the orchestra, the music is humanly very, very difficult". 
		Some reviews noted that the recordings were the best representation 
		of Zappa's 
 orchestral work so far. 
		In 1984 Zappa teamed again with Nagano and the Berkeley 
 Symphony 
		Orchestra for a live performance of A Zappa Affair with augmented 
 orchestra, life-size puppets, and moving stage sets. Although critically 
		acclaimed 
 the work was a financial failure, and only performed twice. 
					For the remainder of his career, much of Zappa's work was influenced 
		by his use of 
 the
		
		
		Synclavier as a compositional and performance tool. Even considering 
		the  
										complexity of the music he wrote, the Synclavierhe could dream up. 
		The 
 Synclavier could be programmed to play almost anything conceivable, 
		to  
										perfection: "With the Synclavier, any group of imaginary instruments 
		can be i 
										nvited to play the most difficult passages ... with 
		one-millisecond accuracy—every  
					time". 
		Even though it essentially did away with the need for musicians, 
		Zappa  
					viewed the Synclavier and real-life musicians as separate. 
		In 1984, he released four  
					albums. 
		
		Boulez Conducts Zappa: The Perfect Stranger, contains orchestral 
		works  
					commissioned and conducted by world-renowned conductor
		
		
		Pierre Boulez (who 
					 
										was listed as an influence on Freak Out!) 
		and performed by his
		
		
		
					Ensemble  
		
					InterContemporain, juxtaposed with premiere Synclavier 
		pieces. Again, Zappa  
										was not satisfied with the performances of his 
		orchestral works as he found them  
										under-rehearsed, but in the album 
		liner notes he respectfully thanks Boulez's  
					demands for precision.The Synclavier pieces stood in contrast to the orchestral 
					 
										works, as the 
		sounds were electronically generated and not, as became possible  
					shortly 
		thereafter,
		
		
		sampled. 
		The album 
		
		Thing-Fish was an ambitious three-record set in the style of a 
		 
		Broadway play dealing with a
		
		
		dystopian "what-if" scenario involving feminism, 
 homosexuality, 
		manufacturing and distribution of the AIDS virus, and a 
 eugenics program conducted by the United States government. 
		New vocals  
				were combined with previously released tracks and new 
		Synclavier music; "the 
 work is an extraordinary example of
		
		
		bricolage".Finally, in 1984, Zappa 
		 
		released 
		
		Francesco Zappa, a Synclavier rendition of works by 18th century 
		 
		composer
		
		
		Francesco Zappa (no known relation), and 
		
		
		Them or Us, a two- 
		record set of heavily edited live and session 
		pieces. 
		 Senate testimony
		
		
		On September 19, 1985, Zappa testified before the
		
		
		United States Senate
		 
		Commerce, Technology, and Transportation 
		committee, attacking the  
		Parents Music Resource Center or
		
		
		PMRC, a music organization, co-founded 
		 
		by
		
		
		Tipper Gore, former wife of then-senator
		
		
		Al Gore. 
		The PMRC consisted 
 of many wives of politicians, including the wives of 
		five members of the  
				committee, and was founded to address the issue of 
		song lyrics with sexual  
		or satanic content. 
		Zappa saw their activities as on a path towards
		
		 
		
		
		censorship, 
		and called their proposal for voluntary
		
		
		labelling of records
		 
		with explicit content "extortion" of the music 
		industry. 
		In his prepared  
		statement, he said: 
		
			The PMRC proposal is an ill-conceived piece of nonsense which 
			fails  
						to deliver any real benefits to children, infringes the civil 
			liberties of  
						people who are not children, and promises to keep the 
			courts busy for 
 years dealing with the interpretational and 
			enforcemental problems 
						inherent in the proposal's design. It is my 
			understanding that, in law, 
 First Amendment issues are decided with 
			a preference for the least  
						restrictive alternative. In this context, 
			the PMRC's demands are the 
 equivalent of treating dandruff by 
			decapitation ... The establishment  
						of a rating system, voluntary or 
			otherwise, opens the door to an 
 endless parade of moral quality 
			control programs based on things  
						certain Christians do not like. 
			What if the next bunch of Washington 
 wives demands a large yellow 
			"J" on all material written or  
						performed by Jews, in order to save 
			helpless children from exposure 
 to concealed Zionist doctrine? 
		 
		Zappa set excerpts from the PMRC hearings to Synclavier music in his 
		 
				composition "Porn Wars" on the 1985 album 
		
		
		Frank Zappa Meets the 
		
		 Mothers of Prevention. Zappa is heard 
		interacting with Senators
		
		
		
		Fritz 
		
		 Hollings,
		
		
		Slade Gorton,
		
		
		Al Gore 
		(who claimed, at the hearing, to be a  
		Zappa fan), and in an exchange 
		with Florida Senator
		
		
		Paula Hawkins
		 
		over what toys Zappa's children played with. Zappa 
		expressed opinions  
		on censorship when he appeared on
		
		
		CNN's 
		
		Crossfire TV series and 
		 
		debated issues with Washington Times 
		commentator
		
		
		John Lofton in 1986. 
 Zappa's passion for American politics was becoming a bigger part of his 
 life. He had always encouraged his fans to 
		
		register to vote on album covers 
		, and throughout 1988 he had 
		registration booths at his concerts. 
		He even considered running for
		
		
		President of the United States. 
		[edit]
		Digital 
		medium and last tour
		Around 1986, Zappa undertook a comprehensive re-release program of 
		his 
 earlier vinyl recordings. 
		He personally oversaw the remastering of all his 
 1960s, 1970s and early 
		1980s albums for the new digital
		
		
		compact disc 
 medium. 
		Certain aspects of these re-issues were, however, criticized by  
				some 
		fans as being unfaithful to the original recordings. 
		Nearly twenty  
		years before the advent of online music stores, Zappa had 
		proposed to  
		replace "phonographic record merchandising" of music by 
		"direct digital 
		-to-digital transfer" through phone or cable TV (with 
		royalty payments  
		and consumer billing automatically built into the 
		accompanying software). 
 In 1989, Zappa considered his idea a "miserable flop". 
		The album 
		
		Jazz From Hell, released in 1986, earned Zappa his first
		
		 
		
		
		Grammy Award in 1987 for
		
		
		Best Rock Instrumental Performance. Except 
 for one live guitar solo 
		(St. Etienne), the album exclusively featured  
		compositions brought to 
		life by the Synclavier. Although an
		
		
		instrumental 
 album, Meyer Music Markets sold Jazz from Hell 
		featuring an "explicit  
				lyrics" sticker—a warning label introduced by the
		
		
		
		Recording Industry 
		
		 Association of America in an agreement with the 
		PMRC. 
		Zappa's last tour in a rock and jazz band format took place in 1988 
		with a 
 12-piece group which had a repertoire of over 100 (mostly Zappa) 
		 
				compositions, but which split under acrimonious circumstances before the 
 tour was completed. 
		The tour was documented on the albums 
		
		
		Broadway 
		
		 the Hard Way (new material featuring songs with strong 
		political 
 emphasis), 
		
		The Best Band You Never Heard in Your Life (Zappa 
		 
				"standards" 
		and an eclectic collection of cover tunes, ranging from  
		
		
		Maurice Ravel's 
		
		
		Boléro 
		to
		
		
		Led Zeppelin's "Stairway 
		to Heaven"),  
		and 
		
		Make a Jazz Noise Here (mostly instrumental and
		
		
		
		avant- 
		
		garde music). Parts are also found on You Can't Do That on 
		Stage  
		Anymore, volumes
		
		
		4 and
		
		
		6. 
		1990s: 
		Classical music and death
		In early 1990, Zappa visited
		
		
		Czechoslovakia at the request of President
		
		 
		
		
		Václav Havel, and was asked to serve as consultant for the 
		government on  
				trade, cultural matters and tourism. Havel was a lifelong 
		fan of Zappa who  
				had large influence in the avant-garde and underground 
		scene in
		
		
		
		Central  
		
		Europe in the 1970s and 1980s (a
		
		
		Czech rock group that was imprisoned in 
		 
		1976 took its name from 
		Zappa's 1968 song "Plastic 
		People"). 
		Zappa  
				enthusiastically agreed and began meeting with corporate officials 
		 
				interested in investing in Czechoslovakia. Within a few weeks, however, 
		 
				the US administration put pressure on the Czech government to withdraw 
 the appointment. Havel made Zappa an unofficial
		
		
		cultural attaché instead. 
		Zappa also planned to develop an international consulting enterprise to 
		 
				facilitate trade between the former Eastern Bloc and Western businesses. 
		
			
				| 
				
				 | 
				
				
					
					
					
						One of Zappa's work for Synclavier on Civilization, 
						Phaze III, cited as his "last great work."[191] 
						  
				 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| 
				  | 
			 
		 
		Most of Zappa's projects came to a halt in 1990, 
		 
				when he was 
		diagnosed with terminal
		
		
		
		prostate  
		
		cancer. The disease had been developing 
		 
				unnoticed for ten 
		years and was considered  
		inoperable. 
		After his diagnosis, Zappa devoted  
				most of his energy to modern 
		orchestral and  
				Synclavier works. In 1993 he completed 
		 
		
		
		Civilization, Phaze III shortly before his death. 
		 
				It was a major 
		Synclavier work which he had 
 begun in the 1980s. 
		In 1991, Zappa was chosen to be one of four featured composers at the 
		world- 
		acclaimed Frankfurt Festival in 1992 (the others were
		
		
		John 
		Cage,
		
		
		
		Karlheinz 
		
		 Stockhausen and
		
		
		Alexander Knaifel). 
		Zappa was approached by the German 
 chamber ensemble,
		
		
		Ensemble Modern, which was interested in playing his 
		 
				music for the 
		event. Although ill, Zappa invited them to Los Angeles for  
		rehearsals of 
		new compositions and new arrangements of older material. 
		In  
				addition to being satisfied with the ensemble's performances of his 
		music,  
				Zappa also got along with the musicians, and the concerts in 
		Germany and 
				Austria were set up for the fall. 
		In September 1992, the concerts went ahead  
				as scheduled, but Zappa could 
		only appear at two in Frankfurt due to illness.  
				At the first concert, he 
		conducted the opening "Overture", and the final "G- 
				Spot Tornado" as well 
		as the theatrical "Food Gathering in Post-Industrial  
				America, 1992" and 
		"Welcome to the United States" (the remainder of the  
				program was 
		conducted by the ensemble's regular conductor Peter Rundel). 
 Zappa 
		received a 20-minute ovation. 
		It would become his last professional  
		public appearance, as the cancer 
		was spreading to such an extent that he  
				was in too much pain to enjoy an 
		event that he otherwise found "exhilarating" 
 Recordings from the concerts appeared on 
		
		The Yellow Shark (1993), Zappa's 
		 
				last release during his 
		lifetime, and some material from studio rehearsals  
		appeared on the 
		posthumous 
		
		Everything Is Healing Nicely (1999). 
		Frank Zappa died on Saturday, December 4, 1993 in his home surrounded 
 by his wife and children. At a private ceremony the following day, Zappa 
		 
				was interred in an unmarked grave at the
		
		
		
		Westwood Village Memorial Park 
		
		 Cemetery in
		
		
		Westwood, Los Angeles. 
		On Monday, December 6 his family  
				publicly announced that "Composer Frank 
		Zappa left for his final tour just  
		before 6:00 pm on Saturday". 
		Legacy
		Acclaim and honors
			Frank Zappa was one of the first to otry tearing down the 
			barriers between 
			rock, jazz, and classical msic. In the later Sixties, his Mothers of 
			Invention 
			would slip from Straviosky's "Petroushka" into the Dovells' "Bristol 
			Stomp" 
			before breaking down into saxaphone squals inspired by Albert Ayler. 
			 
			The Rolling Stone Illustrated History of Rock % Roll 
		
		Zappa earned widespread critical acclaim in his lifetime and after 
		his death.  
		The 2004 Rolling Stone Album Guide writes: "Frank 
		Zappa dabbled in  
		virtually all kinds of music—and, whether guised as a 
		satirical rocker,  
		jazz-rock fusionist, guitar virtuoso, electronics 
		wizard, or orchestral innovator, 
 his eccentric genius was undeniable". 
		Even though his work drew inspiration 
 from many different genres, Zappa 
		was seen establishing a coherent and  
		personal expression. In 1971, 
		biographer David Walley noted that "The whole 
 structure of his music is 
		unified, not neatly divided by dates or time sequences 
 and it is all 
		building into a composite". 
		On commenting on Zappa's music,  
		politics and philosophy,
		
		
		Barry Miles noted in 2004 that they cannot be 
		 
		separated: "It was all 
		one; all part of his 'conceptual continuity'". 
		
			
				
				 333
				
				
					
					Frank Zappa playing his famous
					 
					
					
					Gibson SG barechested in 1977 
			 
		 
		Guitar Player Magazine devoted a special issue 
		 
		to Zappa in 
		1992, and asked on the cover "Is  
		FZ America's Best Kept Musical Secret?" 
		 
		Editor Don Menn remarked that the issue was 
 about "The most important 
		composer to come 
 out of modern popular music".Among those 
		 
		contributing to the issue was composer and
		
		 
		
		
		musicologist
		
		Nicolas Slonimsky, who conducted 
		 
		premiere performances of works of
		
		
		Ives and  
		Varèse in the 1930s. 
		He became friends with 
 Zappa in the 1980s, 
		and said "I admire  
		everything Frank does, because he practically  
		created 
		the new musical millennium. He does  
		beautiful, beautiful work ... It has 
		been my luck  
		to have lived to see the emergence of this totally 
 new type 
		of music." 
		Conductor Kent Nagano remarked in the same issue that  
		"Frank is a 
		genius. That's a word I 3don't use often ... In Frank's case it is not 
		 
		too strong ... He is extremely literate musically. I'm not sure if the 
		general  
		public knows that". 
		Pierre Boulez stated in Musi3cian Magazine's posthumous  
		Zappa 
		tribute article that Zappa "was an exceptional figure because he was 
		 
		part of the worlds of rock and classical music and that both types of 
		his work  
		would survive." 
		Many music scholars acknowledge Zappa as one of the most  
		influential 
		composers of his generationAs an electric guitarist, he has become 
 highly regarded. 
		In 1994, jazz magazine 
		
		Down 
		Beat's critics poll placed Zappa in its Hall of Fame. 
		 
		Zappa was posthumously inducted into the
		
		
		Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1995. 
		 
		There, it was written that 
		"Frank Zappa was rock and roll's sharpest musical  
		mind and most astute 
		social critic. He was the most prolific composer of his age, 
 and he 
		bridged genres—rock, jazz, classical, avant-garde and even novelty 
		music 
		—with masterful ease". 
		He received the
		
		
		Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award 
		 
		in 1997. 
		In 2005, the US
		
		
		National Recording Preservation Board included We're 
 Only in It 
		for the Money in the
		
		
		National Recording Registry as "Frank Zappa's 
 inventive and 
		iconoclastic album presents a unique political stance, both 
		anti- 
		conservative and anti-counterculture, and features a scathing 
		satire on  
		hippiedom and America's reactions to it". 
		The same year, 
		
		Rolling Stone 
 magazine ranked him 71 on its list of the 100 
		Greatest Artists of All Time. 
		[edit]
		Artists 
		influenced by Zappa
		A number of notable musicians, bands and orchestras from diverse 
		genres have 
 been influenced by Frank Zappa's music. Rock artists like
		
		
		Alice Cooper,Primus,
		 
		
		
		Fee Waybill of
		
		
		The 
		Tubes 
		all cite Zappa's influence, as do progressive rock  
		artists like
		
		
		Henry 
		Cow,
		
		Trey Anastasio of
		
		
		Phish, 
		and
		
		
		John Frusciante.
		
		
		Paul McC 
		
		artney regarded 
		
		
		Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band as
		
		
		The Beatles' Freak 
		 
		Out! 
		Heavy rock and metal acts like
		
		
		Black Sabbath,
		
		Mike Portnoy,
		
		
		Warren  
		
		DeMartini,
		
		Steve 
		Vai,
		
		System of a Down, 
		and  
		Clawfinger 
		acknowledge Zappa's 
 inspiration. On the classical music scene, Tomas 
		Ulrich,
		
		
		Meridian Arts  
		
		Ensemble, 
		and the
		
		
		Fireworks Ensemble 
		regularly perform Zappa's compositions 
 and quote his influence. 
		Contemporary jazz musicians and composers
		
		
		
		Bill  
		
		Frisell 
		and  
		John Zorn 
		are inspired by Zappa, as is funk legend
		
		
		
		George  
		
		Clinton. 
		Other artists whose work is affected by Zappa include new age pianist 
 George Winston, 
		electronic composer
		
		
		Bob Gluck, 
		parody singer
		
		
		
		"Weird Al"  
		
		Yankovic, 
		and
		
		
		noise music artist Masami Akita of
		
		
		Merzbow. 
		Metal musician 
 Devin Townsend has also cited Zappa as influence.
		
			 
		  
		THE CONCRETE CLARITY OF UNVARSISHED TRUTH3 
		
			from
			
			
			Daily Kos on 09 July 2006 11:04:01 AM. © Daily Kos 
			  
		Ah, Sunday. A day when perfectly-powdered politicians take to the 
		morning  
		shows and speak directly to the American people. 
		Well, they speak.  I see their lips moving, I see their faces get 
		flushed as they  
		utter their perfectly-framed buzzwords. But are they 
		speaking directly to the 
		 
		American people? 
		Political discourse today, whether it takes place on the Senate floor 
		or on  
		Sunday talk, is slathered with slogans and tired catch-phrases. 
		 It's saturated  
		with bullshit. It's bloated.  It's fat.  It's 
		ineffective.  Great ideas and practical  
		solutions are buried under the 
		avalanche of platitudes that inevitably pour of  
		every politicians mouth, 
		so that every politician regardless of his character  
		ends up sounding 
		the exact same. 
		  
		Let's travel back in time to a real no-spin zone. In 1933, Franklin 
		D. Roosevelt  
		was handed the keys to the White House  at a time of 
		national peril, the Great  
		Depression. In his
		
		
		inauguration speech, Roosevelt spoke plainly to the America 
 people. 
		 He revealed the whole truth, "frankly and boldly": 
		
		
			I am certain that my fellow Americans expect that on my induction 
			into the  
			Presidency  I will address them with a candor and a 
			decision which the  
			present situation of our Nation impels. This is 
			preeminently the time to speak 
 the truth, the whole truth, frankly 
			and boldly. Nor need we shrink from 
			 
			honestly facing 
			conditions in our country today. This great Nation will  
			endure as it 
			has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me 
 assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear 
			itself-- 
			nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes 
			needed efforts to 
 convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour 
			of our national life a  
			leadership of frankness and vigor has met 
			with that understanding and  
			support of the people themselves which 
			is essential to victory. I am  
			convinced that you will again give 
			that support to leadership in these  
			critical days. 
		
		"This Nation asks for action, and action now," he said, and proceeded 
		to state 
 his solution in beautifully simple terms:  putting people to 
		work. What strikes  
		me most about his speech is how he knew at a time 
		when the nation was  
		starving for leadership, talking down to the 
		American people or talking past  
		them with platitudes was not the 
		answer.  Roosevelt followed his frank talk  
		with an offering of hope: 
		
		
			We do not distrust the future of essential democracy. The people of 
			the U 
			nited States have not failed. In their need they have 
			registered a mandate 
 that they want direct, vigorous action. They 
			have asked for discipline and 
 direction under leadership. They have 
			made me the present instrument  
			of their wishes. In the spirit of the 
			gift I take it. 
		
		This formula is what leadership is about: speaking to people as a 
		person, not 
 a politician. It's about leveling with them and 
		speaking to them with a  
		recognition that they are capable of 
		handling the unvarnished truth about the  
		state of our nation. We need to 
		speak with concrete clarity. The American  
		people are grow9n-ups who can 
		handle the unvarnished truth.  They will be  
		more willing to jump on 
		board with practical solutions when they're invited  
		to sit at the table 
		with authentic people they can trust. 
		Everything else sounds like an empty campaign speech.  
		So put your Roosevelt hat on.  When you speak to your fellow 
		Americans 
 about why they should get out and vote Democratic this fall, 
		what will you 
 say? Will you repeat tired talking points or will you 
		connect with them on a  
		personal level?  How will you describe to them 
		the state of our nation? And, 
 above all, how will you convince them that 
		voting Democratic is the most 
 practical solution of all? 
		froim: 
		
		
		
		http://leftword.blogdig.net/archives/articles/July2006/09/Th 
		
		e_Concrete_Clarity_of_Unvarnished_Truth.html 
		  
		Oprah says Obama's tongue 'dipped in the unvarnished truth' 
		
			- note that this article was written BEFORE the election.
 
			
		 
		
		
			
			
			
			
			Oprah says Obama's tongue 'dipped in the unvarnished truth'
			
			
			
			Dan Gearino
			 
			The Quad-City Times 
			|  
			Posted:
			
			
			Saturday, December 8, 2007 12:00 am |
			
			
			  
			
				- 
				
				size
 
			 
			
				
					
					
					
					
						
						
						 
						
						
						
						
						 
						
						Democratic presidential 
						candidate and U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, 
 D-Ill., speaks to 
						a crowd of thousands in Des Moines after Oprah Winfrey 
 delivered a speech on the fellow Chicagoan's behalf 
						Saturday.  
						(AP PHOTO)
						
						 
					 
					
					 
				 
				
				 
			 
			
			
				DES MOINES – The church of Oprah Winfrey was in session 
				Saturday,  
								drawing thousands of Iowans to hear her say why she 
				supports Barack  
				Obama for president. 
				“When you listen to Barack Obama, when you really hear him, 
				you witness  
								a very rare thing,” she said in Des Moines. “You 
				witness a politician who 
 has an ear for eloquence and a tongue 
				dipped in the unvarnished truth.” 
				Winfrey, the television talk show host from Obama’s hometown 
				of Chicago,  
								stood at a podium on a small riser, with the crowd 
				around her on all sides. 
 Obama’s staff said 18,500 people were 
				present, which would make it the  
				largest Iowa event held for a 
				single candidate this year. 
				In an afternoon rich with religious allusions, Winfrey began 
				by saying she’s  
				nervous in her new role as a political advocate. 
				“It feels like I’m out of my pew, I’m out of my terrain,” she 
				said. 
				Obama supporters hope Winfrey’s star power will help their 
				candidate win  
								over undecided voters, particularly undecided 
				women. The U.S. senator from  
								Illinois is locked in a close race 
				in Iowa with U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y 
				., and former North 
				Carolina Senator John Edwards. 
				The audience traveled through freezing rain to get to Hy-Vee 
				Hall in downtown 
 Des Moines. The event was the first stop on a 
				trip that will continue over the  
				next few days in New Hampshire 
				and South Carolina. 
				Nedra Sparland, a retired federal employee from Johnston, 
				wore a badge  
								identifying her as a precinct captain for Obama. 
				She said she’s never  
				volunteered for a candidate before. 
				“It’s pretty darn exciting,” she said, as the crowd formed 
				long lines to enter  
				the hall. 
				Gordon Fischer of Des Moines, an Obama supporter and the 
				former chairman  
								of the Iowa Democratic Party, said Winfrey 
				brought more excitement than he  
				has ever seen at a political 
				event in Iowa. 
				“I know this is totally sacrilegious and I should not say 
				this, but the only thing  
								I can compare this to is when the Pope 
				visited Iowa,” Fischer said, referring  
				to Pope John Paul II’s 
				visit in 1979. 
				Obama took the stage after his wife Michelle and after 
				Winfrey. 
				“You know you’ve got a pretty good show when I’m the 
				third-best speaker,”  
				he said. 
				He gave a revised version of his speech from last month’s 
				Jefferson Jackson  
								Dinner in Des Moines. He said he would value 
				good ideas over poll-driven  
				ideas. 
				“We can’t have a timid politics. We need a bold politics,” he 
				said. 
				Dan Gearino can be reached at 515-243-0138 and
				
				dan.gearino@lee.net. 
			 
			
			
			
			Copyright 2010 The Quad-City Times. All rights reserved.  
			
			
			
			 
			 
		Posted in
		
		
		Local on
		Saturday, December 8, 2007 12:00 am  
		 
		FROM: 
		
		
		
		http://qctimes.com/news/local/article_af9c9ab4-6b7a-5be7-8425- 
		
		57c53103d78b.html 
		  
		
		 
			
				
				
				
					
						 | 
					 
					
						 
						By Robert Ringer  
						 
						Feb. 8, 2010 
						 
						As the U.S. edges ever closer to coming face to face 
						with the consequences 
 of its $100+ trillion of debt and 
						"unfunded liabilities," the cries from the 
 never-give-up-the-fight progressives over "unfettered" 
						capitalism are  
						becoming increasingly louder. The 
						coalition of communists, Marxists,  
						socialists, 
						progressives (a.k.a. "liberals") - along with those who 
						are simply 
 envious, ignorant, or angry - are calling for 
						capitalist scalps.  
						They say that the worsening depression 
						(euphemistically referred to by  
						politicians and media 
						pundits as "recession" - and one that is on the verge 
 of 
						a rebound, at that) is a result of capitalism run amok. 
						More regulation  
						and more redistribution of wealth is the 
						only thing that can save America 
						, right? Not quite.  
						If you want to give a true-believing progressive 
						apoplexy, just tell him the 
 unvarnished truth: The 
						overriding reason that the United States has  
						devolved 
						into a financial basket case is too 
						much regulation, too 
						much 
 taxation, too 
						much
						printing of fiat currency, too 
						much 
						borrowing, too  
						
						much government interference in 
						the marketplace, too much 
						nannyism.   
						You can go right down the list - Social Security, 
						Medicare, Temporary  
						Assistance for Needy Families - all 
						of these programs drain capital from  
						the productive free 
						market, which makes everyone worse off. Another 
						 
						unvarnished truth, one that very few people want to 
						hear, is: The  
						government has no Constitutional - or 
						moral 
						- authority to operate any 
 wealth-transfer 
						program, no matter how worthy some people may believ 
						e it 
						to be. Unfortunately, the idea that a politician's 
						self-proclaimed 
 compassion gives him the right to take 
						the property of law-abiding citizens 
 and give it to 
						others is a perversity that has come to be accepted by a 
						large  
						percentage of the population.   
						A few politicians dance around the edges of this 
						issue, but none seem to 
 be willing to speak out on it 
						unequivocally, which is why the tea party  
						movement is so 
						refreshing. Many politicians have finally said that 
						they've 
 heard the message of the tea party people loud 
						and clear. But, in truth,  
						they haven't.  
						Even Sarah Palin, whose basic ideology seems to be 
						pretty much on  
						target, avoided being specific in her 
						keynote address at the tea party  
						convention in 
						Nashville. Like all other conservatives, Governor Palin 
						 
						said that government has to cut spending, which is fine. 
						But, also like all  
						other conservatives, she did not 
						specifically mention Social Security and 
 Medicare, the 
						two programs that, all by themselves, are 100 percent 
 guaranteed to bankrupt America - no matter what other 
						spending  
						rollbacks government implements.  
						I'll cut the governor some slack here, because it 
						probably wasn't a good  
						time for her to get specific and 
						take on the sacred cows. But hear me on  
						this, 
						Washington: Sooner or later, someone is going to have to 
						get serious  
						with a public that is addicted to nanny 
						statism - a public that doesn't want 
 to hear about 
						economic reality, much less morality.  
						So I end this article with the same question 
						(borrowed from an article by 
 Thomas Friedman, no less) 
						I've asked many times before: Who will tell  
						the people 
						the truth? Right now, no politician has the courage to 
						advocate 
 the phasing out of 
						all wealth-redistribution programs, because they do not 
 believe there is a constituency for cutting 
						entitlements. (Note that I used  
						the term 
						phasing out
						, because to pull the rug out from under Social 
						Security 
 and Medicare recipients cold turkey would cause 
						too much pain and  
						suffering.)   
						Which is why the tea party people are probably 
						America's last hope. What 
 I believe most of the tea 
						party people are saying is "No!" - no to 
						any 
						kind 
 of wealth redistribution ... no to 
						any 
						kind of government involvement in 
						 
						health care ... no to
						any 
						kind of tax increases ... no to 
						any
						kind of "green" 
 legislation ... no to 
						any 
						kind of new regulations. No! No! No! 
						  
						If so, strong voices in the tea party movement must 
						speak up and deliver  
						that message loud and clear to both 
						politicians and voters. If they do not,  
						or if a majority 
						of voters will not accept it, then the question will be 
						not  
						if, but when, the U.S. will experience a 
						complete 
						financial collapse - and A 
						mericans will 
						lose what is left of their freedom.   
						Admittedly, it's a tough message to deliver to 
						everyday Americans, but  
						someone must be willing not only 
						to step forward and do it, but explain, 
 in clear, 
						easy-to-understand terms, why it is not in their best 
						interest to  
						continue to receive government benefits of 
						any kind. Put simply, the public  
						has to be taught that 
						the price of unsustainable wealth-redistribution 
						 
						programs is servitude. And, like it or not, that's the 
						unvarnished truth.  
						 
						From
						
						
						blog.robertringer.com/2010/02/08/the-unvarnished-truth-2 
						 
						 | 
					 
					
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
						
						 | 
					 
					
						 | 
					 
					
						 
						A few politicians dance around the edges of this 
						issue, but none seem to  
						be willing to speak out on it 
						unequivocally... 
						AIP leaders do it every day.  
						And the writer, God love him, cuts Sarah Palin way 
						too much slack, in 
 my opinion. 
						 
						 | 
					 
					
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
						
						 | 
					 
					
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
						 From
						
						
						the America's Independent Party Platform : 
						Restoring limited government
						We seek to restore the intended balance between the 
						three separate  
												branches of our government, and to 
						strictly limit government to the 
 Enumerated Powers 
						granted and expressed by the will of the people  
						of the 
						United States in our Constitution. 
						 
						All existing functions of the Executive branch that are 
						outside of those  
						Enumerated Powers must be eliminated. 
						 
						All spending and regulation by the Legislative branch 
						that lies outside  
						the Enumerated Powers must cease. 
						 
						Judges who attempt to legislate from the bench, or who 
						abandon the  
												clear principles of our Constitution, must 
						be checked if liberty and j 
						ustice are to prevail in our 
						society once again. 
						 
						We demand a return to adherence to the provisions of the 
						Tenth  
												Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United 
						States by the  
												Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the 
						States, are reserved to the  
						States respectively, or to 
						the people."
						
						  
						 | 
					 
					
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
						
						 | 
					 
					
						 | 
					 
				 
				
				
				 | 
			 
			
		 
		
		
		
		
		The Bear on 
		Oct 31 2006 at 8:28 am | Filed under: 
		Uncategorized
		  
		
			My friends,  
			What follows below is a note from an Air Force reservist to the 
			squadron 
 mates he is leaving behind. His words are inspiring to the 
			squadron, and  
			to stateside Americans who seek the unvarnished truth.
			 
			As I head out to wrap-up my five month active reserve tour, I am 
			sad to  
						notice a certain questioning about the direction of the War 
			on Terrorism. 
 So I have something to say to my fellow military 
			members as I walk out 
 the door, and it�s something I feel must be 
			voiced. Please bear with me,  
			as this has been on my mind often in 
			the last few weeks.  
			Every day we hear on the news about another bombing in Baghdad, 
			or  
						about unrest on the Pakistani border to Afghanistan. Recently, 
			another five 
 soldiers were killed in Iraq and sectarian violence is 
			threatening to rip the  
						country apart. And the question that keeps 
			being asked is,  �Can we win this? 
			�  
			 A simple 
			question, but one that is entirely misguided. We�ve already won 
 our 
			fight in Iraq and Afghanistan. The only question left is �How far 
			can we  
			take our victory?�   
			Never again will Al-Queda use Afghanistan to train and send 
			terrorists to  
						attack our homeland. Women now hold elected positions 
			in the country and  
						are going to school, homosexuals aren�t being 
			killed by having walls collapsed  
						upon them, children can fly kites 
			with their fathers in fields without being  
						beaten, people may now 
			listen to music, adults vote in a representative  
						government, and the 
			soccer fields are now used for games instead of mass 
 executions.  
			Never again will Saddam Hussein use his once-large army to invade 
			his  
						neighbors. The Kurds will not be gassed with WMDs, and have 
			turned their  
						portion of the country into the safest part of Iraq. 
			The two sons of Saddam,  
						Uday and Qusay, will never again patrol the 
			streets of Baghdad looking for  
						women to abduct. The Hussein�s will 
			never again oversee the dropping of  
						their enemies into human-sized 
			shredders, nor will they ever house  
						international terrorists in 
			their country as guests. Terrorists such as Abu  
						Nidal, who killed 
			over 900 people in 20 countries and who was a guest living  
						in Iraq 
			for nearly a decade. And al-Zarqawi, the Iraqi al-Queda leader who 
			 
						fled to Iraq after our invasion of Afghanistan, obtained medical 
			treatment  
			under direction of Uday, and is now taking the eternal 
			dirtnap.  
			Sometimes it doesn�t seem like a victory, especially since 
			al-Queda  
						appointed a new leader in Iraq to continue the war. But we 
			know his name  
						and we know his face, and his time will also come. And 
			as tiring as the  
						violence in the Middle East may be, we must 
			acknowledge that we�ve moved  
						the forward edge of the battlefield 
			from the skyline of downtown New York  
			City to the territory of the 
			enemy. This may be our greatest victory.  
			So where do we go from here? How do we capitalize on our 
			achievement of  
						removing two despotic regimes placed on the opposite 
			end of the globe in the  
						course of several years? By giving the 
			Afghan and Iraqi people their shot at r 
						epublican democracy. Note 
			that I did not say by creating democracy in Iraq  
						and Afghanistan, 
			because that can only be done by the citizens, and can never  
						be 
			imposed. That is the moral strength of what we are trying to 
			accomplish;  
						to come as saviors and not as an empire. It took our 
			country eight years to win 
 our own Revolutionary War, and four years 
			later we had to create a new  
						constitution before we could make it 
			work. The French Revolution took longer  
						than two decades, and 
			failed, returning the country back into a monarchy.  
			The Afghans have 
			had five years to attempt the same; the Iraqis three.  
			I�m not a predictor of the future. I�m not a seer. Maybe the 
			nascent Afghan  
						and Iraqi governments will fall into chaos. Maybe the 
			will of the people will be 
 to slaughter one another, neighbor 
			against neighbor, cousin against cousin. But 
 for now our fellow 
			brothers and sisters in uniform are performing amazing  
						feats 
			everyday to give those citizens their one shot at achieving a way of 
			life that  
						those regions have never known in all their existence. And 
			should it fail- should 
 chaos tear their countries apart- there will 
			be people who will dream of a time 
 when their voices were 
			represented by those who governed, and a time when a  
						statue of a 
			tyrant was pulled down and people came from the voting booths  
						while 
			raising purple-stained hands in pride. And maybe those memories will 
 allow for the next generation to step forward when their forebears 
			did not.  
			But if they do succeed now? Then the band of authoritarian 
			countries that wrap  
						around the world from Morocco to Indonesia will 
			have been sliced, and many of  
						the world�s tyrants will sleep 
			uneasily in fear for the rights that their own people  
			will demand. 
			For this I pray.  
			As for me, I have nothing but pride in what my country has done, 
			and for what it 
 is attempting to do during these chaotic times. 
			Instead of sitting back, we are 
 attempting to change the world for 
			the better, and are making the conscious 
 decision to try to actively 
			engage the world instead of the passive, depressed  
						manner of other 
			nations. Whether we succeed in establishing democracy in the  
						region 
			or if we fail, we entered with the righteous intention of keeping 
			our  
						civilians safe, and the enlightened hope of freeing people 
			locked in servitude to  
						the vicious and brutal elements in their 
			midst. When my daughter grows up,  
						in whatever uncertain state the 
			world will be in, I know I can look her in the 
 eyes and say that I 
			was there during the initial chaotic years of the new  
						millennia, and 
			that I fought to leave the world a better place than I had found 
			 
						it. 
			For this opportunity that my country has given me, and for the honor 
			to  
						serve alongside the greatest military servicemen in the world, I 
			will always be 
 proud.  
			Related 
			Hamas’ Must-See TV By Cliff May 
			Hamas may not have funds to pay the salaries of civil servants 
			and improve 
 social services for Palestinians. But resources to fund 
			its propaganda efforts?  
						That, evidently, is not a problem. This 
			month, the terrorist organization that  
			governs Gaza and the West 
			Bank launched a satellite television station. 
			The new station will be broadcast by Arabsat, majority-owned by 
			the Saudi  
						government. Arabsat, along with Nilesat, owned by the 
			Egyptian government, 
 already distribute the programming of Al Manar, 
			the television station of  
			Hezbollah. 
			Hamas, Hezbollah and Al Manar have all been officially designated 
			by the U.S. 
 government as terrorist entities. Meanwhile, the Saudi 
			government runs  
						commercials in the U.S. claiming to be America’s 
			�ally� in the War on  
						Terrorism. And the Egyptian government presents 
			itself as our moderate  
			Arab friend � in exchange for billions of 
			dollars in American aid.  
			FROM: 
			
			
			
			http://www.theabsurdreport.com/2006/the-unvarnished 
			
			-truth-from-the-mid-east/ 
			
		 
		  
		THE UNVARNISHED TRUTH ABOUT CENSORSHIP 
		  
		
		
			
				
				
					Thursday, February 14, 2008
					
						
							
								
								
								
								
									"Facts are stubborn things; and 
									whatever may be our wishes, our 
									inclinations, 
 or the dictates of our 
									passion, they cannot alter the state of 
									facts and evidence." 
 - John Adams, 
									 
									Argument in Defense of the Soldiers in the 
									Boston Massacre  
									Trials, December 1770 
									 
									There are a broad number of unfortunate 
									facts in the world. There are a wide  
																		range 
									of unpleasant things which we would prefer 
									to just not think about. But  
																		as a society, 
									we are always better served to deal with the 
									truth instead of
									
									
									
									hiding 
									
									 our heads in the sand. As a 
									civilization, it is our duty to
									
									
									prepare our children
									 
									for the world by 
									arming them with facts, even as we 
									provide
									
									
									values and beliefs 
									within which to 
									understand those facts. 
									 
									We all do our best to shield our children 
									from the unpleasant and the unhappy,  
																		but our 
									kids are exposed to it anyhow. On a trip to 
									Richmond, or Washington  
									New York, they are 
									exposed to
									
									
									homelessness, even if they live in a 
									wealthy 
 subdvision. In their
									
									
									own neighborhoods they are exposed to 
									violence, even if  
																		parents have done all they 
									can to avoid it. Our kids are part of this 
									world, no  
									matter how we try to shelter them 
									from it. In the long-run,
									
									
									too much shelter 
 can harm them rather 
									than helping them, as the reality of the 
									world is a reality 
 they will grow-up in, 
									live in, work in, and ultimately raise their 
									own families in. 
									 
									That is why we must
									
									
									strive to explain rather than 
									hide reality when our families  
																		are faced 
									with it. And that is also why the censorship 
									of a book in our elementary  
									schools is a 
									grave disservice to our children.   
									
										A children's book about penguins was 
										pulled recently from general cir 
										culation 
										at Loudoun County elementary Schools. 
										 
										The award-winning book, "And Tango Makes 
										Three" tells the true story of 
										 
																				two male 
										Chinstrap Penguins in New York's Central 
										Park Zoo who raised  
										an egg together. -
										
										
										The Loudoun Times-Mirror 
									There are many things wrong with this 
									incident in censorship. Let us examine 
 first 
									how the decision to ban the book was made.
									
									
										A parent at Sugarland Elementary in 
										Sterling raised concerns about the 
 book 
										within the last few months, said Wayde 
										Byard, public information  
										officer for 
										Loudoun County Public Schools. 
										 
										The parent filed a complaint with the 
										principal, who reviewed the book  
																				and 
										deemed it to be appropriate for 
										children. The parent then appealed  
																				that 
										decision, and a district-level committee 
										made up of a parent, a teacher 
																				, a school 
										librarian and administrators reviewed 
										the book. They ruled it  
										was acceptable 
										for general circulation. 
										 
										Superintendent Edgar Hatrick III had 
										final say, though, and decided to 
										 
										override that decision. -
										
										
										The Loudoun Times-Mirror 
									It is wrong for Superintendent Hatrick to 
									substitute his individual judgment  
									over that 
									of the dozens of citizens
									
									
									involved in the decision to retain And 
									Tango  
																		Makes Three over a single parent's 
									complaint. No matter how
									
									
									
									experienced and  
									
									wise Mr. Hatrick is, no 
									matter that he has been a great leader for 
									Loudoun  
																		County's Public Schools through his 
									long tenure, one person should not have 
 the 
									authority to censor a book already vetted, 
									considered and approved. The  
																		community had 
									its input, the community reached its 
									decision. The people who 
 made the decision 
									to retain the book were as representative, 
									if not more  
																		representative, of the norms and 
									values of Loudoun County as Mr. Hatrick 
									 
									himself.
									
									And if sufficient parents are still angry 
									over the decision, the right place to  
									voice 
									that frustration is
									
									
									before the School Board. The right place 
									to effect  
									change of policy is at the ballot 
									box.
									
									Next, there is the question of the double 
									standard.
									
									
										David Weintraub, president of Equality 
										Loudoun, a local gay and lesbian  
																				rights 
										group, said the parent who made the 
										complaint about the book  
																				has not been 
										prevented from expressing his or her 
										beliefs about family. 
 Therefore, he 
										said, why should this person prevent a 
										book from being  
										accessible to others who 
										might have a different idea about 
										family? 
										 
										
											
												
													Loudoun County Public 
													Schools serve children from 
													all kinds of  
																										families, 
													including families with two 
													moms or two dads," he said 
													in  
																										a written statement. "The 
													Administration and School 
													Board need to  
																										remember that 
													when confronted with this 
													sort of book challenge. 
													 
																										Dr. 
													Hatrick needs to explain why 
													he thought this book was 
													 
													inappropriate for 
													circulation." -
													
													
													The Loudoun Times-Mirror 
												The censorship of this book 
												represents a chilling double 
												standard.
												
												
												
												It  
												
												says that the rights of 
												certain kinds of parents trump 
												the rights of other  
																								kinds of 
												parents. It says that children 
												from certain kinds of families 
												will 
 be denied the right to 
												browse their school library and 
												enjoy the delight 
 of a book that 
												seems to speak to them, simply 
												because children from  
																								other 
												kinds of families might also 
												find the same book. 
												Intentionally nor  
																								not, 
												Superintendent Hatrick's 
												decision places an explicit 
												value judgment  
												on different 
												family lives in a school system 
												dedicated to
												
												
												education of all, 
												 
												equally. 
												It says, in effect, that some 
												are more equal than others.
												
												And finally there is the issue 
												of truth. The book in question 
												was not fiction,  
																								it was not a 
												hypothetical example designed to 
												make a point, it was the true 
 story of animals who teamed 
												up to raise a baby at a zoo. The 
												story contains 
 facts told in an 
												entertaining, narrative form. 
												The book stands as an amazing, 
 factual resource for 
												educating small children about 
												the world, using real  
																								ideas and 
												themes (family, zoos, animals) 
												elementary students can easily 
												 
												understand, but which can be 
												placed in a larger context by 
												parents.
												
												We cannot shield our children 
												from the truth forever, that way 
												lies  
																								disappointment and sadness. 
												We must equip them to deal with 
												it. Books  
												like this are an 
												amazing tool to help parents, 
												and teachers, do so.
												
												I leave you with a comment from 
												the discussion of this issue on 
												the post  
												from
												
												
												Living In LoCo.
												
												
													I'll share this with you: i 
													was watching the today show 
													while getting  
																										ready for work 
													a few years ago, and my 5 yr 
													old son walks in just as 
													 
																										they showed 2 men kissing 
													b/c they had just been 
													married in Mass. my  
																										son 
													asked "mommy- why are 2 boys 
													kissing on the LIPS?!?!?" i 
													said,  
																										some boys were born 
													liking to kiss boys, and 
													some boys are born liking 
													 
													to 
													kiss girls. Now how about 
													some coco puffs for 
													breakfast?" 
												The world is out there. Our kids 
												are in it. And no book or lack 
												thereof will  
												shield our children 
												from it.
												
												
												
												 
											 
											
										 
										
									 
									
									
										
											
											
												
												Published on Tuesday, July 
												25, 2006 by the
												
												
												Toronto Star (Canada)
												 
												 
												 
											 | 
										 
										
											| 
											 
												
												Media Self-Censorship Hides 
												Truth  
											 | 
										 
										
											| 
											 
												
												by Antonia Zerbisias 
											 | 
										 
										
											|   | 
										 
										
											| 
											
											 They were gruesome lunchtime 
											images, and totally unexpected.  
											Yesterday, on CNN's Your World 
											Today, correspondent Becky  
																						Anderson 
											in Beirut introduced a report by 
											Karl Penhaul who told  
											of a Tyre 
											family devastated by an Israeli air 
											strike.   
											"Let me tell you, some of these 
											pictures are disturbing," Anderson 
											 
											warned. "Please be aware." 
											  
											Then came the sights and sounds 
											of screaming children, their faces 
											 
																						and bodies barbecued by what the 
											doctor maintains are chemical 
 weapons which, stunningly, are 
											legal.   
											Finally, some reality in reality 
											programming.   
											Oh sure, CNN attempted to balance 
											out this story by preceding it  
																						with 
											a lengthy report by the fatuous 
											Miles O'Brien. He led us up and 
											 
																						down 
											the streets of Haifa playing war 
											correspondent in a melodrama  
																						mostly 
											of his own making, unwittingly 
											mocking the suffering of the  
											people 
											there.   
											"Those Katyusha rockets just keep 
											raining down," he said. "We're 
											 
																						told 
											upwards of 100 came down today. Once 
											again, as we say, Haifa  
																						spared the 
											worst of it today, unlike yesterday, 
											with all those rockets  
																						that came in 
											and a couple of deaths. In this 
											case, no damage or injury 
 to report. 
											And a lot of people here, I'm sure, 
											breathing a sigh of relief. 
 Having 
											said all that, there aren't as many 
											people here as there should 
 be." 
											  
											All of which is why, no matter 
											how many bombs it rains down on 
 Lebanon, no matter how many villages 
											taken, no matter how battles  
											won, 
											Israel will lose the war of world 
											opinion.   
											That despite how Hezbollah 
											launches its rockets from downtown 
											 
																						Lebanon, ostensibly using civilians 
											as shields. The point is, Israel 
											 
																						still fires back, killing those 
											civilians. And it does it with 
											superio 
																						r might and firepower, with 
											the backing of the world's greatest 
											 
											superpower and, sadly, Canada.   
											It doesn't play well on TV, no 
											matter how much the news nets try 
											 
											to 
											balance it.   
											What's different in this war, 
											unlike that in Iraq or Afghanistan, 
											is that  
																						the journalists in both 
											countries are free to roam and 
											report,  
																						unencumbered by embedding 
											and unconfined to army briefings 
											 
											miles from the theatre of 
											operations.   
											Oh sure, the Israelis have a 
											censorship apparatus in place, and 
																						Hezbollah has its media minders, but 
											the pictures tell their own  
											stories. 
											Too bad the mainstream media are not 
											publishing them.   
											For example, all last week, the 
											ghastly photos of torched children 
											 
																						who were part of a civilian convoy 
											trying to escape southern  
											Lebanon 
											were making the rounds on the 
											Internet.   
											None were used, as far as I can 
											tell, by any North American news 
 organization, including this one.
											
											 
											At the same time, other photos 
											were circulating on the Web. These 
 depicted young Israeli girls 
											scrawling messages on missiles bound 
 for Lebanon. The messages spoke of 
											love, but in the ironical sense.   
											Except for the Philadelphia 
											Inquirer � which was singled out 
											for a  
																						scolding by the pro-Israel 
											media watchdog CAMERA � I am not 
											 
											aware of any other paper that used 
											the AP photos.   
											(Just for the record: Yesterday 
											the Jerusalem Post confirmed 
											their  
																						authenticity: "Although an 
											officer was present during the 
											incident, 
 the soldiers, and the IDF 
											as a whole, did not condone or 
											condemn  
											the incident.)   
											So, for all the freedom of 
											journalism in this conflict, there's 
											a lot of  
											self-censorship.   
											We see, as associate professor 
											Richard Fung of the Ontario College 
 of Art emailed me, "mostly 
											atmospheric shots of Israeli 
											soldiers and 
 military hardware; they 
											could be ads for arms manufacturers 
											they are  
											so beautiful, generic, and 
											`neutral.'"   
											We see bombed-out bridges and 
											buildings, as if no drivers or 
											 
											inhabitants were killed.   
											But the truth will come out, with 
											the help of the Internet, mobile 
											 
																						phones and all the tech advantages 
											that are widely available on both 
											 
											sides.   
											Meanwhile, most news 
											organizations are trying to be as 
											even- 
											handed as possible, as if not 
											to offend any of their 
											constituencies.   
											Trouble is, while they're minding 
											their pictures, they're slipping up 
											 
											on their language.   
											Example: On CBC-TV's Sunday 
											Report, Israel had "moved into" 
											 
																						Lebanon as if it had taken 
											possession of a new condo instead of 
											a 
 chunk of the country.   
											Soldiers are "kidnapped" and not 
											"captured."And so it goes. 
											  
											The war is such a media minefield 
											that even bloggers � and I'm 
											 
											talking 
											the bigtime US guys � are reluctant 
											to tiptoe through it.   
											They're afraid of the hate mail.
											
											 
											"I, for one, sure as heck have no 
											desire to get sucked into that 
											no-win  
																						situation," wrote Markos 
											Moulitsas, the guy behind Daily Kos, 
											the  
											biggest progressive blog in the 
											US.   
											The almost-as-popular Kevin Drum 
											(the Washington Monthly) 
											wrote: 
 "As near as I can tell, most 
											conservatives simply take the 
											 
																						uncomplicated stance that 
											Palestinians are terrorists and that 
											Israel 
 should always respond to 
											provocation in the maximal possible 
											way. 
 The fact that this hasn't 
											worked very well in the past doesn't 
											deter 
 them. Liberals don't really 
											have a similarly undemanding 
											position 
 that's suitable for the 
											quick-hit nature of blogging." 
											  
											Cop-outs, both of them.   
											This is a time for truth telling, 
											no matter how gruesome it is.   
											Antonia Zerbisias has more 
											articles at
											
											http://www.thestar.blogs.com.
											
											 
											FROM: 
											
											http://www.commondr eams.org/views06/0725-31.htm 
											
											
											
													 . 
													EDITORS NOTE: This has 
													become such a big 
													controversy  
																										starting a
													couple of days after I 
													posted this dream on line, 
 it couldn't have been a 
													larger coincidence if there 
													is such  
													a thing.  We 
													experience so many of these 
													coincidences  
													every day, we 
													call them little coincidinks.  We say 
													the same  
													word or type he 
													same word as someone on TV 
													says the 
 same word, or just 
													before they do, that it is 
													like we are 
 reading their 
													minds.
											 
											AS OF 12-88-10 - 
											IT HAS BEEN DISCOVERED THAT THE 
											WHOLE  
											
											WIKILEAKS 
											FIASCO WAS SET UP BY THE CIA LIKE A
											 
											FALSE FLAG EVENT IN ORDER THAT THE 
											GOVERNMENT  
											COULD USE IT TO ELIMINATE FREEDOM OF 
											SPEECH 
											AND CURTAIL INTERNET RADIO SHOWS 
											LIKE ALEX  
											JONES AND STEVE QUAYLE ET AL, AND 
											ALTERNATIVE 
											NEW BLOGS WHERE REAL NEWS IS 
											REVEALED HAS 
											COME TO LIGHT.
													Needless to say, we have 
													been so upset by media 
													control  
																										and government 
													control over information, we 
													are proud  
																										that Wikileaks 
													came out and started telling 
													the truth.  We 
 need 
													mmore people like them, not 
													less  We need more 
													 
																										Freedome of the Press - not 
													less.  It's about time 
													the  
																										secrets come out into 
													the open.   
													We want to see the truth 
													about UFOS, ALIEN 
													ABDUCTIONS,  
																										SATANISM RITUALS 
													AND REPTILIANS BEHIND 
													GOVERMENT  
																										OFFICIALS ALL THE 
													WAY FROM THE LITTLE GUY IN 
													CITY  
																										GOVERNMENT, ALL THE WAY 
													TO THE TOP. AND IF 
													 
																										GOVERNMENT AND RELIGIOUS 
													LEADERS WANT TO PLAY 
 HANKIE 
													PANKIE BEHIND OUR BACKS TO 
													MAKE BROWNIE  
																										POINTS WITH 
													OTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS  
													TO GET  
																										TO THE TOP, LET THEM 
													BE KNOWN ABOUT OR LET THEM 
													 
																										STEP DOWN QUIETLY AND GO 
													AWAY SO WE HAVE  
													UPSTANDING 
													CITIZENS IN GOVERNMENT!!!
													
													IF WE DON'T HAVE HONEST 
													ELECTIONS, WHICH WE DON'T 
																										, , 
													LET IT BE KNOWN THAT THE 
													BILDERBERGERS AND THE 
													 
																										BOHEMIAN GROVE CROWD RUN 
													THIS COUNTRY AND  
																										OTHER 
													COUNTRIES, AND THE CFR   
													CONTROLS THIS  
																										COUNTRY WITH 
													THEIR SEX GAMES AND WHATEVER 
													ELSE  
																										THEY DO IN THEIR OCCULT 
													RITUALS, THEN LET IT BE 
													 
																										KNOWN TO THE PUBLIC.!!! 
													WIKILEAKS IS A WORLD 
													PATRIOT!!   !WE 
													APPLAUD THEM!!! 
											  
											
													
													INTRODUCTIONS  TO 
													WIKILEAKS
											
													  
											WikiLeaks Controversies
											
																						
											
											
												lISTEN TO THE SHOW AT 
												http://www.coasttocoastam.com 
											Appearing during the first two 
											hours, radio host 											
											Alex Jones offered  
											commentary on the WikiLeaks 
											situation and controversies 
 surrounding Julian Assange's arrest. WikiLeaks founder Assange 
 is being 
											set up and framed with rape 
											charges, he reported. Further, 
 Jones suggested that Cass Sunstein, the White House regulatory 
 czar, is actually behind WikiLeaks and is using it to create a kind of 
 "digital 9-11," or Internet kill switch. "They've got new legislation in 
 place they're calling the Patriot Act for the Internet-- taxation, 
 regulation, web IDs, a total iron curtain over the alternative press," 
 he declared.  
											Regarding the Army Private (Bradley 
											Manning), suspected of 
 releasing the documents to WikiLeaks, Jones argued that a 
 low level Private would not have access to super-secret US  
											documents and cables that aren't 
											even connected to the US Army. 
 "It's clear that Manning is a patsy from the military angle," and  
											Assange is the patsy as the supposed 
											mastermind, he said. "My  
											point is that this is all being put 
											on display to sell a new 
											McCarthyism in this country, to 
											persecute anybody," and eliminate 
 whistleblowers, Jones warned.  
											  
													"Could become as important a 
													journalistic tool as the 
													Freedom of  
											Information Act." 
													- Time Magazine
													
													1.1 About WikiLeaks
													WikiLeaks is a 
													not-for-profit media 
													organisation. Our goal is to 
													bring  
													important news and 
													information to the public. 
													We provide an  
													innovative, 
													secure and anonymous way for 
													sources to leak  
													information 
													to our journalists (our 
													electronic drop box). One of 
													our 
 most important 
													activities is to publish 
													original source material 
													 
													alongside our news stories 
													so readers and historians 
													alike can see  
													evidence of 
													the truth. We are a young 
													organisation that has grown 
													 
													very quickly, relying on a 
													network of dedicated 
													volunteers around the  
													globe. 
													Since 2007, when the 
													organisation was officially 
													launched,  
													WikiLeaks has 
													worked to report on and 
													publish important 
													information. 
 We also develop 
													and adapt technologies to 
													support these activities.
													 
													WikiLeaks has sustained 
													and triumphed against legal 
													and political  
													attacks 
													designed to silence our 
													publishing organisation, our 
													 
													journalists and our 
													anonymous sources. The 
													broader principles  
													on which 
													our work is based are the 
													defence of freedom of speech 
													 
													and media publishing, the 
													improvement of our common 
													historical  
													record and the 
													support of the rights of all 
													people to create new 
 history. We derive these 
													principles from the 
													Universal Declaration  
													of 
													Human Rights. In particular, 
													Article 19 inspires the work 
													of our  
													journalists and other 
													volunteers. It states that 
													everyone has the  
													right to 
													freedom of opinion and 
													expression; this right 
													includes f 
													reedom to hold 
													opinions without 
													interference and to seek, 
													receive  
													and impart 
													information and ideas 
													through any media and 
													 
													regardless of frontiers. We 
													agree, and we seek to uphold 
													this and  
													the other Articles 
													of the Declaration. 
													1.2 How WikiLeaks works
													WikiLeaks has combined 
													high-end security 
													technologies with 
 journalism 
													and ethical principles. Like 
													other media outlets 
													 
													conducting investigative 
													journalism, we accept (but 
													do not solicit) 
 anonymous 
													sources of information. 
													Unlike other outlets, we 
 provide a high security 
													anonymous drop box fortified 
													by cutting- 
													edge 
													cryptographic information 
													technologies. This provides 
													 
													maximum protection to our 
													sources. We are fearless in 
													our efforts 
 to get the 
													unvarnished truth out to the 
													public. When information 
 comes in, our journalists 
													analyse the material, verify 
													it and write a 
 news piece 
													about it describing its 
													significance to society. We 
													then 
 publish both the news 
													story and the original 
													material in order to  
													enable 
													readers to analyse the story 
													in the context of the 
													original  
													source material 
													themselves. Our news stories 
													are in the comfortable 
													 
													presentation style of 
													Wikipedia, although the two 
													organisations are  
													not 
													otherwise related. Unlike 
													Wikipedia, random readers 
													can not edit  
													our source 
													documents.  
													As the media organisation 
													has grown and developed, 
													WikiLeaks  
													been developing 
													and improving a harm 
													minimisation procedure. 
													 
													We 
													do not censor our news, but 
													from time to time we may 
													remove  
													or significantly 
													delay the publication of 
													some identifying details 
													 
													from original documents to 
													protect life and limb of 
													innocent people.   
													We accept leaked material 
													in person and via postal 
													drops as  
													alternative 
													methods, although we 
													recommend the anonymous 
													 
													electronic drop box as the 
													preferred method of 
													submitting any  
													material. We 
													do not ask for material, but 
													we make sure that if 
													 
													material is going to be 
													submitted it is done 
													securely and that the  
													source 
													is well protected. Because 
													we receive so much 
													information,  
													and we have 
													limited resources, it may 
													take time to review a 
													source's  
													submission.   
													We also have a network of 
													talented lawyers around the 
													globe who  
													are personally 
													committed to the principles 
													that WikiLeaks is based 
													 
													on, 
													and who defend our media 
													organisation. 
													1.3 Why the media (and 
													particularly Wiki leaks) is 
													important
													Publishing improves 
													transparency, and this 
													transparency creates a 
 better society for all 
													people. Better scrutiny 
													leads to reduced  
													corruption 
													and stronger democracies in 
													all society's institutions, 
													 
													including government, 
													corporations and other 
													organisations. A  
													healthy, 
													vibrant and inquisitive 
													journalistic media plays a 
													vital role 
 in achieving 
													these goals. We are part of 
													that media.  
													Scrutiny requires 
													information. Historically, 
													information has been  
													costly 
													in terms of human life, 
													human rights and economics. 
													As a  
													result of technical 
													advances particularly the 
													internet and  
													cryptography - 
													the risks of conveying 
													important information can 
													 
													be 
													lowered. In its landmark 
													ruling on the Pentagon 
													Papers, the US 
 Supreme Court 
													ruled that "only a free and 
													unrestrained press  
													can 
													effectively expose deception 
													in government." We agree. 
													We believe that it is not 
													only the people of one 
													country that keep  
													their own 
													government honest, but also 
													the people of other 
													countries 
 who are watching 
													that government through the 
													media.   
													In the years leading up 
													to the founding of 
													WikiLeaks, we observed  
													the 
													world's publishing media 
													becoming less independent 
													and far 
 less willing to ask 
													the hard questions of 
													government, corporations 
 and 
													other institutions. We 
													believed this needed to 
													change.   
													WikiLeaks has provided a 
													new model of journalism. 
													Because we are 
 not motivated 
													by making a profit, we work 
													cooperatively with other 
													 
													publishing and media 
													organisations around the 
													globe, instead of  
													following 
													the traditional model of 
													competing with other media. 
													We  
													don't hoard our 
													information; we make the 
													original documents  
													available 
													with our news stories. 
													Readers can verify the truth 
													of what  
													we have reported 
													themselves. Like a wire 
													service, WikiLeaks reports 
													 
													stories that are often 
													picked up by other media 
													outlets. We encourage 
 this. 
													We believe the world's media 
													should work together as much 
													as 
 possible to bring stories 
													to a broad international 
													readership. 
													1.4 How WikiLeaks 
													verifies its news stories
													We assess all news 
													stories and test their 
													veracity. We send a 
													 
													submitted document through a 
													very detailed examination a 
													procedure 
													. Is it real? What 
													elements prove it is real? 
													Who would have the  
													motive to 
													fake such a document and 
													why? We use traditional 
													 
													investigative journalism 
													techniques as well as more 
													modern  
													rtechnology-based 
													methods. Typically we will 
													do a forensic analysis  
													of 
													the document, determine the 
													cost of forgery, means, 
													motive, 
 opportunity, the 
													claims of the apparent 
													authoring organisation, 
 and 
													answer a set of other 
													detailed questions about the 
													document.  
													We may also seek 
													external verification of the 
													document For example,  
													for 
													our release of the 
													Collateral Murder video, we 
													sent a team of 
 journalists 
													to Iraq to interview the 
													victims and observers of the 
													 
													helicopter attack. The team 
													obtained copies of hospital 
													records, 
 death certificates, 
													eye witness statements and 
													other corroborating  
													evidence 
													supporting the truth of the 
													story. Our verification 
													process 
 does not mean we 
													will never make a mistake, 
													but so far our method 
 has 
													meant that WikiLeaks has 
													correctly identified the 
													veracity of 
 every document 
													it has published. 
													Publishing the original 
													source material behind each 
													of our stories  
													is the way in 
													which we show the public 
													that our story is authentic. 
 Readers don't have to take 
													our word for it; they can 
													see for  
													themselves. In this 
													way, we also support the 
													work of other  
													journalism 
													organisations, for they can 
													view and use the original 
													 
													documents freely as well. 
													Other journalists may well 
													see an angle 
 or detail in 
													the document that we were 
													not aware of in the first 
													 
													instance. By making the 
													documents freely available, 
													we hope to 
 expand analysis 
													and comment by all the 
													media. Most of all, we 
 want 
													readers know the truth so 
													they can make up their own 
													minds. 
													1.5 The people behind 
													WikiLeaks
													WikiLeaks is a project of 
													the Sunshine Press. It's 
													probably pretty  
													clear by now 
													that WikiLeaks is not a 
													front for any intelligence 
													 
													agency or government despite 
													a rumour to that effect. 
													This rumour  
													was started 
													early in WikiLeaks' 
													existence, possibly by the 
 intelligence agencies 
													themselves. WikiLeaks is an 
													independent 
 global group of 
													people with a long standing 
													dedication to the  
													idea of a 
													free press and the improved 
													transparency in society that 
 comes from this. The group 
													includes accredited 
													journalists,  
													software 
													programmers, network 
													engineers, mathematicians 
													and  
													others. 
													To determine the truth of 
													our statements on this, 
													simply look at  
													the evidence. 
													By definition, intelligence 
													agencies want to hoard 
													 
													information. By contrast, 
													WikiLeaks has shown that it 
													wants to do 
 just the 
													opposite. Our track record 
													shows we go to great lengths 
													 
													to bring the truth to the 
													world without fear or 
													favour. 
													The great American 
													president Thomas Jefferson 
													once observed  
													that the price 
													of freedom is eternal 
													vigilance. We believe the 
													 
													journalistic media plays a 
													key role in this vigilance. 
													1.6 Anonymity for 
													sources
													As far as we can 
													ascertain, WikiLeaks has 
													never revealed any of its 
													 
													sources. We can not provide 
													details about the security 
													of our media 
 organisation or 
													its anonymous drop box for 
													sources because to do  
													so 
													would help those who would 
													like to compromise the 
													security of  
													our organisation 
													and its sources. What we can 
													say is that we operate 
 a 
													number of servers across 
													multiple international 
													jurisdictions and  
													we we do 
													not keep logs. Hence these 
													logs can not be seized. 
													 
													Anonymization occurs early 
													in the WikiLeaks network, 
													long before 
 information 
													passes to our web servers. 
													Without specialized global 
													 
													internet traffic analysis, 
													multiple parts of our 
													organisation must  
													conspire 
													with each other to strip 
													submitters of their 
													anonymity.  
													However, we also provide 
													instructions on how to 
													submit material to  
													us, via 
													net cafes, wireless hot 
													spots and even the post so 
													that even  
													if WikiLeaks is 
													infiltrated by an external 
													agency, sources can still 
													 
													not be traced. Because 
													sources who are of 
													substantial political or 
													 
													intelligence interest may 
													have their computers bugged 
													or their  
													homes fitted with 
													hidden video cameras, we 
													suggest that if sources 
													 
													are 
													going to send WikiLeaks 
													something very sensitive, 
													they do so  
													away from the 
													home and work. 
													A number of governments 
													block access to any address 
													with  
													WikiLeaks in the name. 
													There are ways around this. 
													WikiLeaks has 
 many cover 
													domains, such as 
													https://destiny.mooo.com, 
													that don't 
 have the 
													organisation in the name. It 
													is possible to write to us 
													or  
													ask around for other 
													cover domain addresses. 
													Please make sure  
													the 
													cryptographic certificate 
													says wikileaks.org . 
													2. WikiLeaks' journalism 
													record
													2.1 Prizes and 
													background
													WikiLeaks is the winner of:
													
														- the 2008 Economist 
														Index on Censorship 
														Freedom of 
 
														Expression 
														award   
														- the 2009 Amnesty 
														International human 
														rights reporting 
 
														award 
														(New Media) 
													 
													WikiLeaks has a history 
													breaking major stories in 
													major media  
													outlets and 
													robustly protecting sources 
													and press freedoms. We 
 have 
													never revealed a source. We 
													do not censor material. 
													Since  
													formation in 2007, 
													WikiLeaks has been 
													victorious over every legal 
 (and illegal) attack, 
													including those from the 
													Pentagon, the  
													Chinese Public 
													Security Bureau, the Former 
													president of Kenya,  
													the 
													Premier of Bermuda, 
													Scientology, the Catholic & 
													Mormon  
													Church, the largest 
													Swiss private bank, and 
													Russian companies.  
													WikiLeaks 
													has released more classified 
													intelligence documents 
 than 
													the rest of the world press 
													combined.   
													2.2 Some of the stories 
													we have broken
													
														- War, killings, 
														torture and detention
														
 
														- Government, trade 
														and corporate 
														transparency  
 
														- Suppression of free 
														speech and a free press
														
														
 
														- Diplomacy, spying 
														and 
														(counter-)intelligence
														
														
 
														- Ecology, climate, 
														nature and sciences  
 
														- Corruption, finance, 
														taxes, trading  
 
														- Censorship 
														technology and internet 
														filtering  
 
														- Cults and other 
														religious organizations
														
														
 
														- Abuse, violence, 
														violation  
 
													 
													War, killings, torture 
													and detention 
													
														- Changes in 
														Guantanamo Bay SOP 
														manual (2003-2004) - 
														
 
														Guantanamo Bay's main 
														operations manuals  
														- Of Orwell, Wikipedia 
														and Guantanamo Bay - In 
														where we track 
 
														down and 
														expose Guantanamo Bay's 
														propaganda team   
														- Fallujah jail 
														challenges US - 
														Classified U.S. report 
														into 
 
														appalling prison 
														conditions in Fallujah
														
														 
														- U.S lost Fallujah's 
														info war - Classified 
														U.S. intelligence report 
														
 
														on the battle of 
														Fallujah, Iraq   
														- US Military 
														Equipment in Iraq (2007) 
														- Entire unit by unit 
														
 
														equipment list of the 
														U.S army in Iraq   
														- Dili investigator 
														called to Canberra as 
														evidence of execution 
														
 
														mounts - the Feb 2008 
														killing of East Timor 
														rebel leader Reinado
														
														 
														- Como entrenar a 
														escuadrones de la muerte 
														y aplastar 
 
														revoluciones 
														de El Salvador a Iraq - 
														The U.S. Special Forces 
														 
														manual on how to prop up 
														unpopular government 
														with  
														paramilitaries   
													 
													Government, trade and 
													corporate transparency 
													
														- Change you can 
														download: a billion in 
														secret Congressional 
														
 
														reports - Publication of 
														more than 6500 
														Congressional  
														Research 
														Reports, worth more than 
														a billion dollars of US 
														tax- 
														funded research, 
														long sought after by 
														NGOs, academics and 
														 
														researchers  
														- ACTA trade agreement 
														negotiation lacks 
														transparency - The 
														
 
														secret ACTA trade 
														agreement draft, 
														followed by dozens of 
														 
														other publications, 
														presenting the initial 
														leak for the whole  
														ACTA 
														debate happening today
														
														 
														- Toll Collect 
														Vertraege, 2002 - 
														Publication of around 
														10.000 
 
														pages of a secret 
														contract between the 
														German federal 
														 
														government and the Toll 
														Collect consortium, a 
														private operator  
														group 
														for heavy vehicle 
														tolling system   
														- Leaked documents 
														suggest European CAP 
														reform just a 
 
														whitewash 
														- European farm reform 
														exposed   
														- Stasi still in 
														charge of Stasi files - 
														Suppressed 2007 
														
 
														investigation into 
														infiltration of former 
														Stasi into the Stasi 
														 
														files commission   
														- IGES Schlussbericht 
														Private 
														Krankenversicherung, 25 
														Jan 2010
 
 - Hidden report 
														on the economics of the 
														German private health 
 insurance system and its 
														rentability   
													 
													Suppression of free 
													speech and a free press 
													
														- The Independent: 
														Toxic Shame: Thousands 
														injured in African 
 
														city, 
														17 Sep 2009 - 
														Publication of an 
														article originally 
														published 
 in UK 
														newspaper The 
														Independent, but 
														censored from the 
														 
														Independent's website. 
														WikiLeaks has saved 
														dozens of articles, 
														 
														radio and tv recordings 
														from disappearing after 
														having been  
														censored 
														from BBC, Guardian, and 
														other major news 
														 
														organisations archives.
														 
														- Secret gag on UK 
														Times preventing 
														publication of Minton 
														report
 
 into toxic waste 
														dumping, 16 Sep 2009 - 
														Publication of 
														variations  
														of a 
														so-called 
														super-injunction, one of 
														many gag-orders 
														published 
 by WikiLeaks 
														to expose successful 
														attempts to suppress the 
														free  
														press via 
														repressive legal attacks
														
														 
														- Media suppression 
														order over Turks and 
														Caicos Islands 
														
 
														Commission of Inquiry 
														corruption report, 20 
														Jul 2009 - Exposure 
 of a 
														press gagging order from 
														the Turks and Caicos 
														Islands,  
														related to 
														WikiLeaks exposure of 
														the Commission of 
														Inquiry  
														corruption 
														report   
														- Bermuda's Premier 
														Brown and the BCC 
														bankdraft - Brown went 
														
 
														to the Privy council 
														London to censor the 
														press in Bermuda   
														- How German 
														intelligence infiltrated 
														Focus magazine - Illegal 
														
 
														spying on German 
														journalists   
													 
													Diplomacy, spying and 
													(counter-)intelligence 
													
														- U.S. Intelligence 
														planned to destroy 
														WikiLeaks, 18 Mar 2008 - 
														
 
														Classified 
														(SECRET/NOFORN) 32 page 
														U.S. counterintelligence 
 investigation into 
														WikiLeaks. Has been in 
														the worldwide news.  
														- CIA report into 
														shoring up Afghan war 
														support in Western 
														
 
														Europe, 11 Mar 2010 - 
														This classified CIA 
														analysis from March, 
 outlines possible 
														PR-strategies to shore 
														up public support in 
														 
														Germany and France for a 
														continued war in 
														Afghanistan.  
														Received 
														international news 
														coverage in print, radio 
														and TV.   
														- U.S. Embassy 
														profiles on Icelandic 
														PM, Foreign Minister,
 
 Ambassador - Publication 
														of personal profiles for 
														briefing  
														documents for 
														U.S. officials visiting 
														Iceland. While lowly 
														 
														classified are 
														interesting for subtle 
														tone and internal facts.
														
														 
														- Cross-border clashes 
														from Iraq O.K. - 
														Classified documents 
														
 
														reveal destabalizing 
														U.S. military rules   
														- Tehran Warns US 
														Forces against Chasing 
														Suspects into Iran -
 
 Iran warns the United 
														States over classified 
														document on  
														WikiLeaks
														
														 
														- Inside Somalia and 
														the Union of Islamic 
														Courts - Vital 
 
														strategy 
														documents in the Somali 
														war and a play for 
														 
														Chinese support   
													 
													Ecology, climate, nature 
													and sciences 
													
														- Draft Copenhagen 
														climate change 
														agreement, 8 Dec 2009 - 
														
 
														Confidential draft 
														"circle of commitment" 
														(rich-country) 
														 
														Copenhagen climate 
														change agreement  
														- Draft Copenhagen 
														Accord Dec 18, 2009 - 
														Three page draft 
														
 
														Copehagen "accord", from 
														around Friday 7pm, Dec 
														18, 2009;  
														includes 
														pen-markings   
														- Climatic Research 
														Unit emails, data, 
														models, 1996-2009 - Over 
														
 
														60MB of emails, 
														documents, code and 
														models from the Climatic 
														 
														Research Unit at the 
														University of East 
														Anglia, written between 
														 
														1996 and 2009 that lead 
														to a worldwide debate
														
														 
														- The Monju nuclear 
														reactor leak - Three 
														suppressed videos from 
														
 
														Japan's fast breeder 
														reactor Monju revealing 
														the true extent of  
														the 
														1995 sodium coolant 
														disaster   
													 
													Corruption, finance, 
													taxes, trading 
													
														- The looting of Kenya 
														under President Moi - 
														$3,000,000,000 
														
 
														presidential corruption 
														exposed; swung the Dec 
														2007 Kenyan 
 election, 
														long document, be 
														patient  
														- Gusmao's $15m rice 
														deal alarms UN - Rice 
														deal corruption in
 
 East 
														Timor   
														- How election 
														violence was financed - 
														the embargoed Kenyan 
														
 
														Human Rights Commission 
														report into the Jan 2008 
														killings  
														of over 1,300 
														Kenyans   
														- Financial collapse: 
														Confidential exposure 
														analysis of 205 
														
 
														companies each owing 
														above EUR45M to 
														Icelandic bank 
														 
														Kaupthing, 26 Sep 2008 - 
														Publication of a 
														confidential report 
														 
														that 
														has lead to hundreds of 
														newspaper articles 
														worldwide   
														- Barclays Bank gags 
														Guardian over leaked 
														memos detailing 
 
														offshore 
														tax scam, 16 Mar 2009 - 
														Publication of censored 
														 
														documents revealing a 
														number of elaborate 
														international tax 
														 
														avoidance schemes by the 
														SCM (Structured Capital 
														Markets)  
														division of 
														Barclays   
														- Bank Julius Baer: 
														Grand Larceny via Grand 
														Cayman - How 
 
														the largest 
														private Swiss bank 
														avoids paying tax to the 
														Swiss 
 government   
														- Der Fall Moonstone 
														Trust - Cayman Islands 
														Swiss bank trust
 
 exposed
														
														 
														- Over 40 billion euro 
														in 28167 claims made 
														against the 
 
														Kaupthing 
														Bank, 23 Jan 2010 - List 
														of Kaupthing claimants 
 after Icelandic banking 
														crash   
														- Northern Rock vs. 
														WikiLeaks - Northern 
														Rock Bank UK failed
 
 legal injunctions over 
														the ¡Ì24,000,000,000 
														collapse   
														- Whistleblower 
														exposes insider trading 
														program at JP Morgan -
 
 Legal insider trading in 
														three easy steps, 
														brought to you by  
														JP 
														Morgan and the SEC   
													 
													Censorship technology 
													and internet filtering 
													
														- Eutelsat suppresses 
														independent 
														Chinese-language TV 
														station
 
 NTDTV to satisfy 
														Beijing - French sat 
														provider Eutelsat 
														covertly  
														removed an 
														anti-communist TV 
														channel to satisfy 
														Beijing  
														- Internet Censorship 
														in Thailand - The secret 
														internet censorship 
														
 
														lists of Thailand's 
														military junta   
													 
													Cults and other 
													religious organizations 
													
														- Church of 
														Scientology's 'Operating 
														Thetan' documents leaked 
														
 
														online - Scientology's 
														secret, and highly 
														litigated bibles  
														- Censored Legion de 
														Cristo and Regnum Cristi 
														document 
 
														collection - 
														Censored internal 
														documents from the 
														Catholic  
														sect Legion de 
														Cristo (Legion of 
														Christ)   
														- US Department of 
														Labor investigation into 
														Landmark 
 
														Education, 2006 
														- 2006 investigative 
														report by the U.S. 
														 
														Department of Labor on 
														Landmark Education   
													 
													Abuse, violence, 
													violation 
													
														- Report on Shriners 
														raises question of 
														wrongdoing - 
 
														corruption 
														exposed at 22 U.S. and 
														Canadian children's 
														 
														hospitals.  
														- Claims of 
														molestation resurface 
														for US judo official
														
														
 
														- Texas Catholic 
														hospitals did not follow 
														Catholic ethics, 
 
														report 
														claims - Catholic 
														hospitals violated 
														catholic ethics   
													 
													3. Short essays on how a 
													more inquiring media can 
													make a  
													difference in the 
													world
													3.1 The Malaria Case 
													Study: the antidote is good 
													governance 
 born from a 
													strong media
													Malaria is a case study 
													in why good governance not 
													just good 
 science is the 
													solution to so much human 
													suffering. This year, 
 the 
													mosquito borne disease will 
													kill over one million 
													people.  
													More than 80% of 
													these will be children. 
													Great Britain used  
													to have 
													malaria. In North America, 
													malaria was epidemic and 
													 
													there are still a handful of 
													infections each year. In 
													Africa malaria  
													kills over 
													100 people per hour. In 
													Russia, amidst the 
													corruption  
													of the 1990s, 
													malaria re-established 
													itself. What is the 
													difference 
 between these 
													cases?  
													Why does Malaria kill so 
													many people in one place but 
													barely  
													take hold in another? 
													Why has malaria been allowed 
													to gain a  
													foothold in places 
													like Russia where it was 
													previously  
													eradicated? We 
													know how to prevent malaria 
													epidemics. The  
													science is 
													universal. The difference is 
													good governance.   
													Put another way, 
													unresponsive or corrupt 
													government, through  
													malaria 
													alone, causes a children's 
													"9/11" every day. [1] 
													  
													It is only when the 
													people know the true plans 
													and behaviour  
													of their 
													governments that they can 
													meaningfully choose to 
													 
													support or reject them. 
													Historically, the most 
													resilient forms of 
 open 
													government are those where 
													publication and revelation 
 are protected. Where that 
													protection does not exist, 
													it is our  
													mission to provide 
													it through an energetic and 
													watchful media. 
													In Kenya, malaria was 
													estimated to cause 20% of 
													all deaths in  
													children under 
													five. Before the Dec 2007 
													national elections, 
													 
													WikiLeaks exposed $3 billion 
													of Kenyan corruption, which 
													 
													swung the vote by 10%. This 
													led to changes in the 
													constitution 
 and the 
													establishment of a more open 
													government. It is too  
													soon 
													to know if it will 
													contribute to a change in 
													the human cost  
													of malaria in 
													Kenya but in the long term 
													we believe it may. It is 
 one 
													of many reforms catalyzed by 
													WikiLeaks unvarnished 
													 
													reporting.3.2 The importance 
													of principled leaking to 
													journalism, 
 good government 
													and a healthy society   
													
													Principled leaking has 
													changed the course of 
													history for the  
													better. It 
													can alter the course of 
													history in the present, and 
													it  
													can lead us to a better 
													future.   
													Consider Daniel Ellsberg, 
													working within the US 
													government 
 during the 
													Vietnam War. He comes into 
													contact with the  
													Pentagon 
													Papers, a meticulously kept 
													record of military and 
 strategic planning 
													throughout the war. Those 
													papers reveal 
 the depths to 
													which the US government has 
													sunk in deceiving  
													the 
													American people about the 
													war. Yet the public and the 
													 
													media know nothing of this 
													urgent and shocking 
													information.  
													Indeed, secrecy 
													laws are being used to keep 
													the public ignorant  
													of gross 
													dishonesty practised by 
													their own government. In 
													 
													spite of those secrecy laws 
													and at great personal risk, 
													Ellsberg  
													manages to 
													disseminate the Pentagon 
													papers to journalists and 
 to 
													the world. Despite criminal 
													charges against Ellsberg, 
													 
													eventually dropped, the 
													release of the Pentagon 
													Papers shocks  
													the world, 
													exposes the government lying 
													and helps to shorten  
													the war 
													and save thousands of both 
													American and Vietnamese 
 lives. 
													The power of principled 
													leaking to call governments, 
													corporations  
													and 
													institutions to account is 
													amply demonstrated through 
													recent  
													history. The public 
													scrutiny of otherwise 
													unaccountable and 
													secretive 
													institutions forces them to 
													consider the ethical 
													 
													implications of their 
													actions. Which official will 
													chance a secret,  
													corrupt 
													transaction when the public 
													is likely to find out? What 
													 
													repressive plan will be 
													carried out when it is 
													revealed to the  
													citizenry, 
													not just of its own country, 
													but the world? When the 
 risks of embarrassment and 
													discovery increase, the 
													tables are  
													turned against 
													conspiracy, corruption, 
													exploitation and  
													oppression. 
													Open government answers 
													injustice rather than 
													 
													causing it. Open government 
													exposes and undoes 
													corruption.  
													Open governance 
													is the most effective method 
													of promoting  
													good 
													governance.   
													Today, with authoritarian 
													governments in power in much 
													of the  
													world, increasing 
													authoritarian tendencies in 
													democratic  
													governments, and 
													increasing amounts of power 
													vested in  
													unaccountable 
													corporations, the need for 
													openness and  
													transparency is 
													greater than ever. WikiLeaks 
													interest is the  
													revelation 
													of the truth. Unlike the 
													covert activities of state 
													 
													intelligence agencies, as a 
													media publisher WikiLeaks 
													relies  
													upon the power of 
													overt fact to enable and 
													empower citizens  
													to bring 
													feared and corrupt 
													governments and corporations 
													to 
 justice.   
													With its anonymous drop 
													box, WikiLeaks provides an 
													avenue  
													for every government 
													official, every bureaucrat, 
													and every  
													corporate worker, 
													who becomes privy to damning 
													information  
													that their 
													institution wants to hide 
													but the public needs to 
													know.  
													What conscience cannot 
													contain, and institutional 
													secrecy  
													unjustly conceals, 
													WikiLeaks can broadcast to 
													the world. It is  
													telling 
													that a number of government 
													agencies in different 
													countries  
													(and indeed some 
													entire countries) have tried 
													to ban access to  
													WikiLeaks. 
													This is of course a silly 
													response, akin to the 
													ostrich  
													burying its head in 
													the sand. A far better 
													response would be to  
													behave 
													in more ethical ways. 
													Authoritarian 
													governments, oppressive 
													institutions and corrupt 
 corporations should be 
													subject to the pressure, not 
													merely of  
													international 
													diplomacy, freedom of 
													information laws or even 
													 
													periodic elections, but of 
													something far stronger - the 
													consciences  
													of the people 
													within them.   
													3.3 Should the press 
													really be free? 
													In its landmark ruling on 
													the Pentagon Papers, the US 
													Supreme  
													Court ruled that 
													"only a free and 
													unrestrained press can 
													effectively  
													expose deception 
													in government." We agree.
													 
													The ruling stated that 
													"paramount among the 
													responsibilities of a  
													free 
													press is the duty to prevent 
													any part of the government 
													from  
													deceiving the people 
													and sending them off to 
													distant lands to die 
													of 
													foreign fevers and foreign 
													shot and shell."   
													It is easy to perceive 
													the connection between 
													publication and the 
													 
													complaints people make about 
													publication. But this 
													generates a  
													perception bias, 
													because it overlooks the 
													vastness of the invisible. 
													 
													It overlooks the unintended 
													consequences of failing to 
													publish and  
													it overlooks all 
													those who are emancipated by 
													a climate of free  
													speech. 
													Such a climate is a 
													motivating force for 
													governments and 
 corporations 
													to act justly. If acting in 
													a just manner is easier than 
													 
													acting in an unjust manner, 
													most actions will be just.
													
													 
													Sufficient principled 
													leaking in tandem with 
													fearless reporting will 
													 
													bring down administrations 
													that rely on concealing 
													reality from their  
													 
													own 
													citizens. 
													It is increasingly 
													obvious that corporate fraud 
													must be effectively 
													 
													addressed. In the US, 
													employees account for most 
													revelations of  
													fraud, 
													followed by industry 
													regulators, media, auditors 
													and, finally,  
													the SEC. 
													Whistleblowers account for 
													around half of all exposures 
													 
													of fraud.   
													Corporate corruption 
													comes in many forms. The 
													number of  
													employees and 
													turnover of some 
													corporations exceeds the 
													 
													population and GDP of some 
													nation states. When 
													comparing  
													countries, after 
													observations of population 
													size and GDP, it is  
													usual to 
													compare the system of 
													government, the major power 
													 
													groupings and the civic 
													freedoms available to their 
													populations. 
 Such 
													comparisons can also be 
													illuminating in the case of 
													 
													corporations.   
													Considering the largest 
													corporations as analogous to 
													a nation state 
 reveals the 
													following properties: 
													
														- The right to vote 
														does not exist except 
														for share holders 
														
 
														(analogous to land 
														owners) and even there 
														voting power is in 
 proportion to ownership.
														
														 
														- All power issues 
														from a central 
														committee.
 
														- There is no 
														balancing division of 
														power. There is no 
														fourth
 
 estate. There are 
														no juries and innocence 
														is not presumed. 
														- Failure to submit to 
														any order may result in 
														instant exile.
 
														- There is no freedom 
														of speech.  
 
														- There is no right of 
														association. Even 
														romance between men 
														
 
														and 
														women is often forbidden 
														without approval.   
														- The economy is 
														centrally planned.  
 
														- There is pervasive 
														surveillance of movement 
														and electronic 
														
 
														communication.   
														- The society is 
														heavily regulated, to 
														the degree many 
														employees 
 
														are told when, 
														where and how many times 
														a day they can go to t 
														he 
														toilet.   
														- There is little 
														transparency and 
														something like the 
														Freedom of 
 
														Information 
														Act is unimaginable.
														
														 
														- Internal opposition 
														groups, such as unions, 
														are blackbanned, 
														
 
														surveilled and/or 
														marginalized whenever 
														and wherever possible.
														
														 
													 
													While having a GDP and 
													population comparable to 
													Belgium,  
													Denmark or New 
													Zealand, many of these 
													multi-national corporations 
													 
													have nothing like their 
													quality of civic freedoms 
													and protections.  
													This is 
													even more striking when the 
													regional civic laws the 
													company  
													operates under are 
													weak (such as in West Papua, 
													many African states 
 or even 
													South Korea); there, the 
													character of these corporate 
													 
													tyrannies is unregulated by 
													their civilizing 
													surroundings.   
													Through governmental 
													corruption, political 
													influence, or manipulation 
 of the judicial system, 
													abusive corporations are 
													able to gain control  
													over 
													the defining element of 
													government the sole right to 
													deploy  
													coercive force.   
													Just like a country, a 
													corrupt or unethical 
													corporation is a menace to 
													all  
													inside and outside it. 
													Corporations will behave 
													more ethically if the  
													world 
													is watching closely. 
													WikiLeaks has exposed 
													unethical plans and 
 behaviour in corporations 
													and this as resulted in 
													recompense or other  
													forms of 
													justice forms of justice for 
													victims. 
													3.4 Could oppressive 
													regimes potentially come to 
													face legal  
													consequences as a 
													result of evidence posted on 
													WikiLeaks?
													The laws and immunities 
													that are applied in national 
													and international  
													courts, 
													committees and other legal 
													institutions vary, and we 
													can't 
 comment on them in 
													particular. The probative 
													value of documents  
													posted on 
													WikiLeaks in a court of law 
													is a question for courts to 
													 
													decide.  
													While a secure chain of 
													custody cannot be 
													established for anonymous 
													 
													leaks, these leaks can lead 
													to successful court cases. 
													In many cases, it 
 is easier 
													for journalists or 
													investigators to confirm the 
													existence of a  
													known 
													document through official 
													channels (such as an FOI law 
													or legal  
													discovery) than it 
													is to find this information 
													when starting from nothing. 
 Having the title, author or 
													relevant page numbers of an 
													important 
 document can 
													accelerate an investigation, 
													even if the content itself 
													has  
													not been confirmed. In 
													this way, even unverified 
													information is an  
													enabling 
													jump-off point for media, 
													civil society or official 
													investigations. 
 Principled 
													leaking has been shown to 
													contribute to bringing 
													justice to 
 victims via the 
													court system. 
													 | 
												 
											 
											
											
											FROM: 
											
											
											http://wikileaks.org/media/about.html 
									
											  
											
										         | 
										
									
		| 
		 SCRUTINIZING, TILL THE 
		TRUTH IS KNOWN... 
		
		
		
		Please see our Fair Use Notice 
		
		
		 
		
		
		December 7, 2010br />
		 
		Wikileaks or WikIsrael? WikiAngel or WikiWeasel? We Won't Let 
		 
		Them 
		Pull The Wool Over Our Eyes! 
		
		 
		Hello everysoul! 
		 
		I just have so much material to share with you that I've decided to 
		 
		split it into 3 compilations. This first one deals almost (aside from a 
		 special focus below on the tense situation in the Korean peninsula) 
		 
		solely with the Wikileaks phenomenon that has reached critical mass 
 in 
		the last week with a barrage of media coverage, which is now  
		ebbing away 
		as everything does in the short attention span of  
		nowadays shallow media 
		coverage of current events, always  
		chasing the next Big Thing as soon as 
		the last one stops being new 
		. In fact this whole WikiThing is sooo "last 
		week" already... Yet there 
 is much to be concerned and informed about.
		 
		 
		You will find below a smorgasborg of viewpoints on it, most of them 
 being extremely skeptical of the whole charade, many in fact viewing 
 it 
		as another kind of 9/11, a view I support as you'll see in my first 
 long 
		comment on top of the first article below. If we recall correctly 
 not 
		only the original 9/11 false flag operation was used to launch 2  
		phony 
		and very bloody wars, but it was also the excuse to ram down 
 everyone's 
		throat the infamous Patriot Act which has set the stage  
		for today's full 
		spectrum destruction of a growing number of freedoms 
 and rights that, in 
		the US, are supposed to be enshrined in the 
 constitution... Think for 
		instance about the lunatic gropefest going 
 on in US airports and before 
		boarding US-bound flights from  
		anywhere around the world and you'll have 
		an idea of what it is  
		coming to... And BTW I have over 30 pages of Rape 
		Gate Update 
 material that I'll also email you separately in the next 
		couple days as 
 this is far from over... And I'll also email you a 
		"regular" fact-filled  
		compilation... all three adding up to over 103,000 
		words... 
		 
		So where is the parallel with 9/11? As the US and other Western 
		 
		governments come to realize that they cannot wack-a-mole
		Wikileaks   
		out of existence - check 
		its galaxy of mirror sites - 
		I would not be  
		surprised that, as some are beginning to realize, they 
		will use this  
		situation as an excuse to take over the Internet and clamp 
		down  
		China-style on the freedom of speech that is exponentially hacking 
		 
		at the branches of their legitimacy, exposing their lies and 
		lobbies- 
		driven corruption, and empowering countless good people to not 
		 
		only question the official lines spewed by the propaganda  
		shamstream 
		media, but organize
		
		through all kinds of ways to 
 change the world from the bottom up. 
		 
		We may have to go around the "roadblocks" and access-denial 
		 
		clogged Web 
		arteries that may result from such possible attempts 
 to stifle free 
		speech, but I trust that with enough ingenuity and  
		persistence, the 
		voice of the conscience of millions of awakening  
		souls will continue to 
		come through loud and clear – and peacefully 
 – to campaign and cocreate 
		the changes we can believe in... the 
 ones we came here to manifest. 
		 
		Feel free to ERNleak this widely ;-) 
		 
		Jean Hudon  
		Earth Rainbow Network Coordinator 
		
		http://www.earthrainbownetwork.com 
		 
		 
		 
		Is WikiLeaks A CIA Operation? Part 1 -  
		Part 2
		HERE -  
		Part 3
		HERE 
		
		http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xw-tvJyPGvc 
		Webster Tarpley exposes Julian Assange and Wikipedia as a  
		CIA operation. 
		 
		WikiLeaks is ZioPoison! 
		
		http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYIC2BMhE5A 
		 
		LAST MINUTE DEVELOPMENT 
		 
		Britain Arrests WikiLeaks Founder on Sex Charges  
		(December 7, 2010)
		 
		
		http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/08/world/europe/08assange.html 
		LONDON — In the latest twist in the drama swirling around the  
		WikiLeaks 
		anti-secrecy group, British police officials said on  
		Tuesday they had 
		arrested Julian Assange, its beleaguered founder 
		, on a warrant issued in 
		Sweden in connection with alleged sex  
		offenses.Mr. Assange, a 
		39-year-old Australian, was arrested by  
		officers from Scotland Yard’s 
		extradition unit when he went to a  
		central London police station by 
		prior agreement with the authorities, 
 the police said. A court hearing 
		was expected later.In a statement,  
		the police said: “Officers from the 
		Metropolitan Police extradition unit 
 have this morning arrested Julian 
		Assange on behalf of the Swedish  
		authorities on suspicion of rape.”Mr. 
		Assange denies the charges of  
		sexual misconduct said to have been 
		committed while he was in  
		Sweden in August. It was not immediately clear 
		if Mr. Assange would  
		resist extradition to Sweden for questioning by 
		prosecutors there.  
		CLIP - AS IS MENTIONED FURTHER BELOW.. 
		 
		.
		
		Assange Accuser Worked with US-Funded, CIA-Tied Anti-Castro  
		 
		
		Group 
		"at least one of which is US-funded and openly supported by 
 a former CIA 
		agent convicted in the mass murder of seventy three  
		Cubans on an 
		airliner he was involved in blowing up." AS ilyes  
		(ilyes@earthlink.net) 
		JUST POINTED OUT TO ME ADDING "the  
		one who's allegedly CIA-PsyOps 
		involved is one of the women who 
		've levied the charge of 'rape' against 
		him ... in Sweden, 'rape'  
		includes sexual relations without a condom... 
		What if he genuinely  
		IS innocent of all the crazy Zionist/CIA propaganda 
		charges?" AS  
		THE TITLE OF THIS COMPILATION IMPLIES - WikiAngel or 
		 
		WikiWeasel? - THE JURY IS STILL OUT... YOU DECIDE... 
		 
		To ensure that these compilations are not blocked, please add 
		globalvisionary@earthrainbownetwork.com to your safe senders list. 
 If 
		you don't know how to do so, go at 
		 http://www.truthout.org/whitelisting where you will find a very 
		 
		comprehensive set of instructions. Your feedback is as always  
		welcomed 
		and may be included in a coming compilation - unless 
 you prefer it is 
		not. Circulating this compilation (or any part of it)  
		and personally 
		inviting your correspondents to subscribe to this 
 list would also help 
		enlarge the circle of people who have access 
 to this material. Please 
		include the following note and the URL  
		address for the archived copy 
		below along with your forwards, so  
		others may have the opportunity to 
		explore the original copy, if they 
 so choose. 
		 
		
		 
		THE QUOTES 
		 
		"Although the election of Barack Obama gave rise to the "outrage" 
		 
		expressed by the so-called "tea party" movement, if there is any 
		 
		political group in America that has a right to be outraged, it is the 
 Progressives. They bought into Obama's message of change and  
		hope, 
		believed that the criminals of the Bush dictatorship would  
		have to 
		answer for their crimes, and naively dreamed that America' 
		s respect for 
		peace, justice and human rights would be restored. But, 
 as Wikileaks and 
		the antics of Obama's "Justice" Department have  
		shown, the Progressives 
		were deceived. Yet, as in the past, they are 
 forced to be supportive of 
		Obama's duplicity because the alternative  
		is worse. I want to believe 
		that the Wikileaks documents will change 
 America for the better. But 
		what undoubtedly will happen is a  
		repetition of the past: those who 
		expose government crimes and 
 cover-ups will be prosecuted or branded as 
		criminals; new laws  
		will be passed to silence dissent; new Liebermans 
		will arise to  
		intimidate the corporate-controlled media; and new ways 
		will be 
 found to conceal the truth. What Wikileaks has done is make 
		 
		people understand why so many Americans are politically apathetic  
		and 
		content to lose themselves in one or more of the addictions  
		American 
		culture offers, be it drugs, alcohol, the Internet, video  
		games, 
		celebrity gossip, text-messaging-in essence anything that  
		serves to 
		divert attention from the harshness of reality." 
		 
		- David R. Hoffman - Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru --  
		Taken from
		
		Valerie Plame, YES! Wikileaks, NO!  
		below A MUST READ. Powerful, eye-opening articl0 
		 
		"It is a well-known practice of intelligence agencies to give large 
		 
		bits 
		of genuine material, none of it too compromising, in order to  
		get either 
		an important piece of intelligence in return or to “bury”  
		some damaging 
		deception like a fish hook planted in a minnow." 
		 
		- Taken from  
		A rebuke to "Is 
		Wikileaks a front for the CIA or Mossad?" below 
		 
		 
		GORDON DUFF: THE WIKI HOAX (December 2, 2010) 
		
		http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/02/gordon-duff-the-wiki-hoax/ 
		True colors, we are seeing them now. Those still trying to peddle the 
 Wikileaks myth, the boyish grin concealing the powerful conspiracy, 
 espionage and treason at the highest levels of American society,  
		these 
		are the real enemies of the information age. There are two  
		opinions of 
		Wikileaks. The worlds intelligence services all, every  
		single one, 
		believes Wikileaks is simply an intelligence agency 
 playing games. They 
		say this to each other, Vladimir Putin and  
		Zbigniew Brzezinski have 
		announced it to the world and others are 
 following suit. Nobody, at 
		least nobody typically “answerable” will 
 say the word “Israel” but it is 
		what they mean when they say  
		“intelligence agency.” They mean Israel. 
		Every Wikileak does 
		something to help Israel in a different way at a 
		different time. If I 
		srael has a problem, a Wikileak is there, part of 
		the solution. This  
		time, Secretary Clinton was in the way and Wikileaks 
		showed up to  
		gut the State Department and give Israel the usual “buff 
		and polish” 
		job they usually do.There is another group, not a group that 
		actually 
 believes Wikileaks is real, few but the “Joe Six-Pack” crowd 
		buys  
		that, but a group that loves Wikileaks like an addict loves a fix. 
		The 
 press loves Wikileaks. I even love Wikileaks. Wikileaks is pushing 
		 
		readership through the roof, not just America but worldwide. 
 Wikileaks 
		is a news marketing phenomenon like any disaster.  
		There is a reason the 
		media are compared to vultures and hyenas. 
		Killing Wikileaks as the hoax 
		it is, and not a harmless hoax, not by  
		a long shot, is like killing the 
		golden goose. Wikileaks sells news,  
		pulls up website traffic to 
		unimaginable levels, even crashes servers 
 from overload. There isn’t 
		just one story, teaching the world how  
		bad America is, there is also the 
		daytime TV drama, the soap opera 
 of Julian Assange.I wonder when the 
		public will pick up on the 
 endless stream of carefully posed, carefully 
		staged photos. Just  
		imagine meeting Assange, hiding from Interpol, 
		running for his life, 
 the CIA hunting him down, angry “date rape’ 
		victims lurking the  
		streets of London and Amsterdam. He always has time 
		for the media, 
 never misses an interview. 
		 
		(...) Calling Wikileaks a simple hoax is a kindness. Maybe we can call 
 9/11 a hoax also. Will the families of the dead feel any better? History 
 will prove Wikileaks, 9/11, the invasion of Iraq, the mindless and 
		 
		seemingly eternal fiasco of Afghanistan are all acts in the same play, 
		 
		certainly a tragedy but hardly Shakespearean. Bradley Manning isn’t 
 the 
		“Wikileaker,” not by a long shot. If the FBI’s assertions about  
		AIPAC 
		are correct and there is no reason to believe otherwise,  
		Wikileaks could 
		easily be the small army of “dual citizens,” the only  
		possible suspects. 
		There is no other group able to silence and shelve 
 the FBI, able to pull 
		documents out of databases at Defense, State,  
		foreign embassies. The sad 
		attempts to blame Manning or the  
		Chinese, certainly victims of the 
		recent revelations, are acts of  
		desperation.Wikileaks the hoax isn’t an 
		area for rumination. You  
		accept the fact or show your colors, red white 
		and blue or blue and  
		white.That time is here, the debates are long over. 
		Assange a hero?  
		Assange a victim? Where you see those questions, look 
		behind them.  
		You will see the smiling face of treason, not for the first 
		time. 
		 
		Assange Accuser Worked with US-Funded, CIA-Tied Anti-Castro  
		Group 
		(December 4, 2010)  
		
		http://my.firedoglake.com/kirkmurphy/2010/12/04/assanges-chief- 
		
		accuser-has-her-own-history-with-us-funded-anti-castro-groups- 
		
		one-of-which-has-cia-ties/ 
		Yesterday Alexander Cockburn reminded us of the news Israel Shamir 
 and 
		Paul Bennett broke at Counterpunch in September. Julian  
		Assange’s chief 
		accuser in Sweden has a significant history of work 
 with anti-Castro 
		groups, at least one of which is US funded and  
		openly supported by a 
		former CIA agent convicted in the mass  
		murder of seventy three Cubans on 
		an airliner he was involved in  
		blowing up. CLIP 
		 
		Wikileaks: Brought to you by the CIA - These guys nailed it back 
 in July 
		
		http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjW4s5EtG6s 
		Everything you wanted to know about Wikileaks but didn't know to 
		 
		ask 
		Julian Assange. He's a guy with a vague history... Who travels  
		the world 
		without visible means of support... His parents: Members  
		He hates the 
		9/11 truth movement... He has no info about the Bush  
		or Obama White 
		House...or the Federal Reserve Bank... or Goldman  
		Sachs (but he is 
		helping take down Bank of America)... His "leaks"  
		paint Pakistan as a 
		threat and foreign politicians the CIA doesn't  
		ike as jerks... He 
		believes Osama is alive... and probably in Pakistan 
		 
		Everything else 
		he "leaks" is stuff we all already knew... The 
 mainstream media loves 
		him... The right wingers love to hate him 
 and are using him as a 
		justification to censor the Net... If it looks 
 like a duck, sounds like 
		a duck and smells like a duck... Another  
		intelligence agency spectacle. 
		(Comment from 
		BrasscheckTV) If  
		you like how these 2 guys treat deliver their angle 
		on the 
 propaganda of the lamestream check their other releases through 
		feed://newworldnextweek.blip.tv/rss/itunes/ 
		 
		 
		SPECIAL FOCUS ON THE HEIGHTENED RISK OF A 
		FULL-BLOWN  
		WAR IN KOREA 
		 
		NOTE from Jean: With each passing day, the rising tensions 
		between 
 North and South Korea - which the US appears to be keen on 
		fostering, 
 perhaps as a smokescreen for its own crumbling economic 
		situation  
		but also as part of the Cabal gradual build up of a
		casus belli to 
		engage 
 at some point into a wider war with China whose growing economic 
		 
		and military clout, paired with a possible secret alliance with its own 
		 
		group of ETs (according 
		to David Wilcock), may be jeopardizing the  
		Cabal's agenda. I know 
		this sounds far-fetched but, nevertheless, I feel 
 there is a growing 
		cause for concern there and that should some 
 inconsiderate and yet 
		deliberate action ignite the power keg that this 
 whole heavily 
		militarized peninsula is, it will be extremely difficult to 
 climb back 
		from an ensuing full, bloody confrontation that could have 
 far-reaching 
		consequences that none of the actors involved seems to  
		be willing to 
		seriously consider and factor into their current aggressive 
 posturing. 
		So if you feel like sending peaceful and healing vibes to the 
 millions 
		of souls who have been trapped into this long tragedy of a  
		people 
		separated by 2 opposing paradigms instilled into them by their 
		 
		respective controllers from day one of their lives, by all means 
		shower 
 liberally all souls concerned with the Love-filled Light of 
		forgiveness, 
		compassion and reconciliation, for the highest good of 
		all... as One. 
		 
		China urges dialogue on North Korea crisis (December 7, 2010)  
		
		http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11934402 
		China says dialogue and co-operation are the only way forward to help 
		 
		deal with tensions on the Korean peninsula.The responsibility for 
		 
		maintaining peace should be "shouldered by all parties in the region," 
 foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said.China - North Korea's  
		main 
		ally - is under pressure from the US and others to rein in the 
		 
		"provocative" North.It comes two weeks after North Korea's deadly 
 attack 
		on a South Korean island in answer to military drills by Seoul 
		.Two South 
		Korean marines and two civilians were killed when  
		Pyongyang shelled 
		Yeonpyeong island on 23 November.It was the 
 first attack on a 
		civilian-populated area in the South since the end 
 of the Korean war in 
		1953.The situation on the peninsula remains  
		highly unstable. South Korea 
		has entered a second day of major  
		live-fire exercises, despite warnings 
		from the North. 
		 
		KNOW THE FACTS: North Korea lost close to 30% of its population  
		as a 
		result of US bombings in the 1950s by Michel Chossudovsky 
 (27 November 
		2010) 
		
		http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22131 
		The World is at a dangerous crossroads. The US is seeking a  
		pretext to 
		wage war on North Korea. North Korea is said to  
		constitute a threat to 
		Global Security. From the Truman Doctrine to 
		Obama. The history of the 
		1950s Korean war confirms that extensive 
 war crimes were committed 
		against the Korean people. As  
		confirmed by the statement of General 
		Curtis Lemay: "Over a period 
 of three years or so we killed off - what - 
		twenty percent of the  
		population." North Korea lost close to thirty 
		percent of its  
		population as a result of US led bombings in the 1950s. 
		US military 
 sources confirm that 20 percent of North Korea's population 
		was  
		killed off over a three period of intensive bombings: "After 
		 
		destroying North Korea's 78 cities and thousands of her villages, 
 and 
		killing countless numbers of her civilians, [General] LeMay  
		remarked, 
		"Over a period of three years or so we killed off - what - 
 twenty 
		percent of the population." It is now believed that the  
		population north 
		of the imposed 38th Parallel lost nearly a third  
		its population of 8 - 9 
		million people during the 37-month long  
		"hot" war, 1950 - 1953, perhaps 
		an unprecedented percentage of  
		mortality suffered by one nation due to 
		the belligerance of another. 
		" During The Second World War the United 
		Kingdom lost 0.94% of  
		its population, France lost 1.35%, China lost 
		1.89% and the US  
		lost 0.32%. During the Korean war, North Korea lost 
		close to 30 % 
 of its population. These figures of civilian deaths in 
		North Korea 
 should also be compared to those compiled for Iraq by the 
		Lancet  
		Study (John Hopkins School of Public Health). The Lancet study 
		e 
		stimated a total of 655,000 Iraqi civilian deaths, following the US 
		 
		led 
		invasion (March 2003- June 2006). We call upon the people of 
		the US, 
		Canada and NATO countries to put pressure on their 
 governments. A war on 
		North Korea would engulf the entire region. 
		 
 - CHECK ALSO
		
		Escalation in the Korean Peninsula?   
		
		US and South Korea plan more war 
		games -
		 
		
		Dangers of Military Escalation: Russian,   
		
		Chinese foreign ministers 
		discuss Korean conflict - 
 US-South Korea military drills.  
		 
		
		China opposes any military acts in 
		exclusive economic zone   
		
		without permission -
		
		The Threat of War in Korea: 
		
		 Philippines prepares for possible mass 
		evacuation from S.Korea,   
		
		requests Japan's aid -
		
		New Korean war could ensnare Canada,   
		
		documents suggest -
		US 
		Exploits Korean Clash to Step Up   
		Pressure on China -
		
		VIDEO: South Korea Admits to Firing  
		
		Shells at North Korea -
		
		Skirmish between North and South Korea: 
		
		 South Korea Fired the First Shot 
		-  
		
		http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22139 
		 
		Korea War Pretext Incident: The Sinking of the Cheonan,  
		Reviewing the 
		Evidence 
		 
		Ron Paul: Korea Conflict May Be Orchestrated Crisis To Boost  
		Dollar 
		(November 23, 2010) 
		
		RAND Corporation has been aggressively lobbying the Pentagon 
		
		 to become 
		embroiled in a major new war to jump-start a recovery 
 of the US 
		economy and boost profits for the military-industrial  
		complex after the 
		scaling down of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. 
 Chinese media sources 
		reported that RAND had presented a  
		proposal to the Pentagon that 
		revolved around fostering a conflict  
		with a major foreign power in order 
		to stimulate the American  
		economy and prevent a double dip recession. 
		Although at the time  
		RAND considered North Korea on its own to be too 
		small a target, 
 any full scale confrontation between the Koreas would 
		embroil  
		the United States on the side of the South and China on the side 
		 
		of the North. If North Korea were to tap its arsenal of nuclear  
		weapons, 
		the entire international community would quickly rubber  
		stamp a US-led 
		military assault on the rogue nation. Given the fact 
 that North Korea's 
		nuclear belligerency has its foundations in the  
		best efforts of people 
		like Donald Rumsfeld and the Bush  
		administration, through the AQ Khan 
		weapons trading network, 
 to provide Communist agitator Kim Jong-Il and 
		his hereditary 
 successor with nuclear weapons, the fact that we are now 
		seeing  
		tensions reach boiling point represents a huge opportunity for 
		the 
 US military-industrial complex to manipulate into being the 
 massive 
		war that they have been seeking for years. -  
		 
		CHECK ALSO
		
		The Korean Crisis: Cui Bono? 
		 
		S. Korea starts naval firing drills amid tension (Dec 6, 2010) 
		
		http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2010-12-05-koreas- 
		
		conflict_N.htm 
		SEOUL (AP) - South Korean troops pushed ahead with naval  
		firing drills 
		Monday, a day after North Korea warned such  
		exercises would aggravate 
		already high tensions between the 
 rivals following the North's deadly 
		shelling last month of a front- 
		line South Korean island.South Korea's 
		army began firing artillery  
		into the waters off the divided Korean 
		peninsula as part of week- 
		long drills set to continue through Sunday, 
		South Korean army  
		and Joint Chiefs of Staff officers said.The officers, 
		who spoke on 
 condition of anonymity citing office rules, said the drills 
		were to  
		take place at nearly 30 sites, but none of Monday's exercises 
		were 
 near the disputed western sea border between the Koreas where  
		last 
		month's attack took place. The navy said warships were to join 
 the 
		drills later this week. South Korea's military and Defense 
 Ministry 
		declined to provide further details on the drills.Tensions 
 have soared 
		since Nov. 23, when North Korea rained shells on  
		Yeonpyeong Island, 
		killing four South Koreans, including two  
		civilians. The North said 
		South Korea first fired artillery toward its  
		territorial waters. South 
		Korea says it fired shells southward, not  
		toward North Korea, as part of 
		routine exercises. Deadly skirmishes 
 occur periodically along the 
		disputed maritime border, but the  
		latest assault on Yeonpyeong, home to 
		both fishing communities  
		and military bases, was the North's first to 
		target a civilian area  
		since the 1950-53 Korean War. The North also 
		stoked regional  
		tension last month by revealing a large 
		uranium-enrichment facility 
 that would give it a new method of making 
		material for atomic  
		bombs in addition to its known plutonium-based 
		program. Top  
		diplomats from the U.S., South Korea and Japan were to meet 
		in 
 Washington on Monday to discuss the North's nuclear program 
 and its 
		artillery barrage. On Sunday, North Korea lashed out at 
 South Korea for 
		causing "uncontrollable, extreme" tension on the 
 peninsula, pointing to 
		the planned firing drills and what it called  
		South Korea's "frantic 
		provocations." "The South Korean puppet  
		group, far from drawing a lesson 
		from the deserved punishment it 
 faced for its reckless firing of shells 
		into the territorial waters of the  
		(North Korea) side around Yeonpyeong 
		Island, is getting more  
		frantic in military provocations and war moves," 
		the North's official 
 Korean Central News Agency said. A KCNA dispatch 
		warned that 
 a war between the Koreas would disturb regional peace and 
		security.  
		South Korean Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin said last week that 
		jets  
		would bomb the North if it stages another attack. Kim took office 
		 
		Saturday, replacing a predecessor who resigned amid criticism that  
		South 
		Korea's response to the shelling was too slow and weak.Kim 
 inspected an 
		army base near the heavily fortified land border  
		Sunday and urged troops 
		to strengthen their combat capability and 
 mental toughness, according to 
		his office. A day earlier, he visited 
 Yeonpyeong Island and vowed to 
		take strong measures to ensure  
		North Korea would not dare to make more 
		provocations. Despite the 
 recent attack, the Defense Ministry believes 
		it's unlikely North Korea 
 would launch a full-scale war because it could 
		not wage a conflict  
		for long and because of South Korea's solid military 
		alliance with 
 the United States, Yonhap news agency reported Sunday 
		citing the  
		military. The Yeonpyeong attack came eight months after the 
		sinking 
 of a South Korean warship blamed on a North Korean torpedo 
		attack 
 - also near the maritime border. Forty-six sailors were killed. 
		North  
		Korea has vehemently denied involvement. The Korean War ended  
		with 
		an armistice, not a peace treaty, technically leaving the two  
		countries 
		still at war. The U.S. stations 28,500 troops in South Korea 
 to deter 
		potential aggression from North Korea. 
		 
		North Korea: U.S.-South drills may trigger war (Dec 6, 2010) 
		
		http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2010-11-30-korea_N.htm 
		SEOUL - South Korea on Tuesday rejected China's offer to host talks 
		 
		over 
		a North Korean attack on its soil as lawmakers here demanded 
 the 
		military better prepare the country for the risk of war.Meanwhile,  
		North 
		Korea warned that military drills between the United States and  
		South 
		Korea could trigger a "full-blown war."Fighter jets from the USS 
 George 
		Washington streaked across overcast skies during the drills  
		taking place 
		off the west coast of South Korea. Navy Cmdr. Pete  
		Walczak said no 
		unusual movements had been detected from North  
		Korea. "Absolutely 
		nothing," Walczak said. "A lot of saber-rattling,  
		fist-shaking, but once 
		our presence is here, reality says that it's really 
 nothing."Hong Lei, 
		spokesman for China's foreign ministry, reiterated 
 his country's offer 
		to host emergency talks for envoys from the  
		nations that comprise the 
		suspended six-party discussions on North  
		Korea's nuclear weapons 
		program. The U.S. and its allies said China  
		must do more than ask its 
		ally North Korea to attend a discussion. 
		"The Chinese have a duty and 
		obligation" to pressure "the North  
		Koreans that their belligerent 
		behavior has to come to an end," White 
 House spokesman Robert Gibbs 
		said. 
		(...) "If North Korea showers Seoul with artillery rounds and rockets, 
		 
		there are predictions that half of the capital will be destroyed in just 
 a day," Yoo said according to The Chosun Ilbo, a Seoul newspaper. 
 "The 
		only solution is to deliver precise strikes on North Korean 
 positions 
		first through a massive air attack in the early stages of a  
		war."North 
		Korea also rejected China's offer of talks and slammed the 
 presence of 
		the U.S. Navy at the drills taking place south of  
		Yeonpyeong, which was 
		shelled Nov. 23, leaving four people dead. 
		"Our republic has a war 
		deterrent that can annihilate any aggressor 
 at once," said the 
		government-run newspaper Minju Joson. At a  
		rally in Seoul, Kim Ji Young 
		gripped flowers and a "No War" placard 
 and with her other hand took a 
		microphone at a gathering outside  
		the South Korean Defense Ministry 
		headquarters."I am angry at the  
		war games. They could start a war," says 
		Kim, 21, a philosophy  
		student at Ewha Women's University in Seoul. "Our 
		president is too  
		strong toward North Korea."At another rally, veterans 
		tore and burned 
 North Korean flags and photos of North Korean leader Kim 
		Jong Il  
		and his son and heir apparent Kim Jong Un."We've had enough," 
		said  
		Kim Jin Gyu, 64, adding that North Korea deserves punishment. "We 
		 
		should just smash it up." CLIP - CHECK ALSO
		
		Carter on North Korea:  
		
		'We may well have peace' 
		 
		Spiralling out of Control: The Risk of a New Korean War  
		(December 4, 
		2010) 
		
		http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22252 
		(,,,) President Lee has promised to take a much harder line on North 
		 
		Korea, and already the South has sent 400,000 propaganda leaflets  
		across 
		the border on balloons. (13) There has also been talk of  
		resuming 
		loudspeaker broadcasts across the border. The sending of  
		leaflets was in 
		violation of a 2004 agreement between the two sides to  
		halt propaganda 
		campaigns aimed at each other. By the end of  
		December, South Korea 
		plans to hold another round of artillery drills  
		on islands lying in 
		disputed waters, including, dismayingly enough,  
		Yeonpyeong Island. 
		Nothing could be calculated to be more 
 provoking under the 
		circumstances. In preparation for the response 
 to the drills that are 
		expected from North Korea, island defenses are 
 being beefed up. South 
		Korea has added multiple rocket launchers, 
 howitzers, missile systems 
		and advanced precision-guided artillery  
		to the Yeonpyeong arsenal. 
		According to a South Korean official,  
		"We decided to stage the same kind 
		of fire drill as the one we carried 
 out on the island on November 23 to 
		display our determination."  
		The new drills appear calculated to provoke 
		a conflict, and this time 
 South Korea is intent on an asymmetrical 
		response. The military is  
		revising its rules of engagement so as to 
		jettison concerns about  
		starting a wider conflict. If former Defense 
		Minister Kim Tae-young 
 is to believed, if there is another North Korean 
		strike, then warships  
		and fighter jets of both South Korea and the U.S. 
		will launch attacks  
		on the North. Incoming Defense Minister Kim 
		Kwan-jin is if anything 
 even more determined to fan the flames of 
		conflict into a wider  
		conflagration. The South Korean military will 
		immediately launch  
		"psychological warfare," including, presumably, 
		loudspeaker  
		broadcasts across the border. The North has promised to 
		target  
		loudspeakers if they are put in operation, and that would in turn 
		 
		provide the pretext for the South Korean military to launch combat 
		 
		operations. If there is another exchange of fire with the North, Kim 
 announced, "We will definitely air raid North Korea." All combat 
		 
		forces 
		available would be mobilized, he promised. The newly minted 
 rules of 
		engagement are also going to permit "preemptive" strikes  
		on North Korea 
		based on the presumption of a possible attack. In  
		other words, if North 
		Korea fails to provide a pretext for military action, 
		the Lee 
		Administration can attack the North without provocation, if it  
		chooses 
		to do so.  Lee Myung-bak has already achieved his dream of 
		 
		demolishing the Sunshine Policy. Relations between the two Koreas  
		are at 
		their lowest point since the end of military dictatorship in  
		South 
		Korea. Now he aims to deliberately trigger armed conflict in  
		order to 
		demonstrate "toughness," and not incidentally, drive the  
		final nail into 
		the coffin of the Sunshine Policy. Defense Minister Kim 
 Kwan-jin feels 
		that the risk of war is low. "It will be difficult for North 
 Korea to 
		conduct a full-scale war because there are some elements  
		of insecurity 
		in the country, such as the national economy and power 
 transfer." Those 
		may be arguments against North Korea's ability to 
 successfully sustain a 
		long-term war over the course of a year or two, 
 but it seriously 
		misreads the ability and will of the North Korean  
		military to put up a 
		determined fight. The extent of possible South 
 Korean air strikes on the 
		North is not clear, but anything other than 
 an extremely limited and 
		localized action is likely to trigger total war. 
 And that is a war that 
		the U.S. will inevitably be drawn into. Even  
		presuming a quick defeat of 
		the North (which would be unlikely),  
		eighty percent of North Korea is 
		mountainous, providing ideal  
		terrain for North Korean forces to conduct 
		guerrilla warfare. The 
 U.S. could find itself involved in another 
		failing military occupation. 
 With both sides heavily armed, the 
		consequences could be much  
		worse for Koreans, and casualties could reach 
		alarming totals. Four 
 million Koreans died in the Korean War. Even one 
		percent of that  
		total in a new war would be unconscionable, and Lee 
		Myung-bak is  
		deluded if he believes he can ride the tiger of armed 
		conflict and  
		remain in control of the path it takes. 
		 
		Note from Jean: (I wrote this over a week ago when I first tried 
		to 
 make sense of it all). Around the world there is a bit of a media 
		 
		frenzy over the release of these classified US documents and it is 
		 
		certainly interesting to see what comes to the light now - after  
		having 
		been carefully filtered by Wikileaks in conjunction with 5  
		global 
		newspapers and some vetting of critically sensible  
		information by the US 
		itself. As you'll discover if you delve into  
		this mass of information, 
		much of it is of a relatively trivial nature  
		with little long term 
		impact. In a couple weeks from now everyone  
		will have moved on to the 
		next BIG NEWS of the day and it will all  
		soon be forgotten - just as 
		what happened to the information  
		recently revealed through Wikileaks on 
		the Afghan and Iraq 
		war  
		logs now nearly invisible in the world's rear-view mirror. What 
		is  
		REALLY important in this NOT so coincidental release of material  
		is 
		once again hidden in plain view, but diluted for the moment in  
		the mass 
		of trivia that fascinates so many. You'll see that there is 
 already ONE 
		BIG THING that will keep coming up in the media,  
		which may very well 
		explain why this was done, and it is the 
 revelation - which being done 
		in this manner makes it  
		indisputable in everyone's gullible mind - that 
		North Korea has  
		sold to Iran advanced Russian-designed missile 
		technology that  
		may soon allow this uncontrollable (by the Cabal) 
		country to 
 threaten European capitals with potentially nuclear-tipped 
		 
		intermediate range missiles, and possibly even Washington in the 
 near 
		future once the Iranian have figured out how to build  
		intercontinental 
		ballistic missiles, all of which constitutes a  
		'wonderful', convenient 
		justification for launching a US/Israel 
		-lead preemptive nuclear attack 
		against Iran, the perfect trigger - 
 in the Cabal's view - to blow the 
		global power keg. 
		 
		Another telling Wikileaks revelation is the fact that, privately, all 
		 
		Arab countries around Iran want the US to "cut the snake's head", 
		 
		another convenient psychological justification-for-war element. 
 There is 
		also the troubling matter of Pakistan's quickly expanding  
		nuclear 
		arsenal and the alleged fear that some hypothetical non- 
		CIA controlled 
		terrorist group could put its hands on Pakistani 
 nuclear material in the 
		event of a meltdown of the military control  
		over its fissile material 
		and weapons, which to me is only a  
		diversionary psy-op tactic because I 
		believe that, in fact, the 
		CIA/Cabal has a firm control over Pakistan's 
		military establishment 
 and if ever some nuclear material is leaked to 
		some patsy terrorist  
		group, it will be with their clear but covert 
		approval as part of a plan 
 hatched to create a false flag dirty bomb 
		event in some US city to 
 justify retaliating against Iran - same model 
		as the 9/11 pretext  
		to attack Iraq. 
		 
		Now, very little attention is paid in the propaganda media to the 
		 
		mysterious source [I don't believe
		Bradley 
		Manning is this source.  
		That's just another diversion. More on this 
		below...] at the origin of  
		all the material released to
		Wikileaks over the past year, to 
		the 
 motivations behind this massive leaking, and especially to the long 
		 
		term ramifications of this strategic move by the tight group of  
		powerful 
		men - the infamous dark cabal/shadow government - who 
 are possibly the 
		only ones with enough string-pulling power to  
		achieve such a feat 
		without being detected. Some have called this  
		event a sort of new 9/11 
		and there is some truth to it as once again 
 a highly secret cabal has 
		mastered a feat of global mind  
		manipulation towards the furtherance of 
		its world domination  
		agenda. I feel it is important to keep this 
		perspective in mind over  
		the coming weeks and months so as to better 
		understand the moves  
		made on the global chessboard by the worldly agents 
		of the reptilian 
 entities who, from their deep underground lairs, battle 
		with the  
		galactic federation to keep control of this planet, a battle we 
		are here 
 to help turn to the Light Forces's advantage as part of our own 
		"deep 
 penetration" covert mission of redemption... if you see what I 
		mean. 
 It is up to us now to not get fooled with this whole cooked up 
		affair  
		and to turn this, aikido-like, into an opportunity to further 
		enlighten 
 everyone about the Cabal's many shenanigans and the 
		duplicitous 
 nature of their covertly controlled governments and media... 
		 
		including Wikileaks! 
		 
		This being said, I must add that it is very likely that most if not all 
 people involved in Wikileaks definitely have their heart at the right 
		 
		place and are convinced they are doing this for the greater good of 
 all. 
		They certainly deserve our kudos and support for their courage 
 and 
		persistence, even if some of the information they are leaking  
		has been 
		planted there to further the Cabal's agenda as I surmise  
		above. Also it 
		is probable that there will be unintended  
		consequences to all this 
		exposure of government's dealings, some 
 of which may not turn out to be 
		exactly supportive of the Cabal's 
 covert agenda. 
		 
		Here is also what ERN subscriber Jeff Wefferson  
		(therockist@yahoo.com) 
		from Australia wrote about this issue:  
		"In case you haven't noticed, the 
		entire "classified" infrastructure 
 of the United States government has 
		recently been compromised 
 by a lone individual wielding a memory stick, 
		who has 
 mysteriously accessed a vast amount of top-secret government 
		 
		information and provided it all to the global public via...yes, 
		 
		Wiki-Leaks! Or so the story goes that is appearing all over the 
		 
		mainstream media. There's a reason why this story sounds so  
		much like 
		that of the 19 box-cutter-wielding "hijackers" who flew 
 four hijacked 
		planes over half of America while the entire U.S. Air 
 Force 'stood 
		down', flew two of them into the World Trade Centres 
 and one into the 
		Pentagon, causing both towers to collapse into  
		their own footprint. Both 
		stories are equally bogus crocks of shite  
		concocted by the same psy-ops 
		think-tanks in the basement of CIA 
 hq in Langley Virginia. 9/11 and its 
		mainstream story were the  
		"problems" created by the NWO and PNAC to 
		provide a "new Pearl  
		Harbor" which would justify an astronomically 
		lucrative "war on  
		terror", their "solution" to not having a credible 
		global "enemy"  
		since Communism ate it. Because of 9/11 and its official 
		story,  
		otherwise intelligent people have sat and watched while every 
		right  
		they had, every dollar they earn, every thought they think has 
		been  
		systematically taken from them in the name of the "war on terror." 
		 
		The internet has long been the one glimmer of hope that we had with 
 respect to being able to exchange information by-passing the global 
 media mono-culture, so that, for those of us who still care, we could 
 formulate a picture of what is REALLY going on. This "Wiki-leaks" 
		 
		thing 
		is nothing more than a "9/11" against the internet as we currently 
 know 
		it. Obama: "We must seize this opportunity to preserve freedom 
 and 
		democracy by cracking down on those who would abuse the  
		privilege of the 
		free internet to subvert the peaceful intentions of the 
 United States of 
		America. God bless us all. Amen. ps. Yes, we can!"  
		BEWARE: as usual, 
		things are NOT what they seem." 
		
		 
		MUCH MORE ON THIS IN THE NEXT ARTICLES BELOW 
		
		 
		From: 
 http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,731580,00.html 
		 
		The US Diplomatic Leaks -  
		A Superpower's View of the World 
		 
		By SPIEGEL Staff - 11/28/2010 
		 
		251,000 State Department documents, many of them  
		secret embassy reports 
		from around the world, show  
		how the US seeks to safeguard its influence 
		around the 
 world. It is nothing short of a political meltdown for US 
		 
		foreign policy. 
		 
		What does the United States really think of German  
		Chancellor Angela 
		Merkel? Is she a reliable ally? Did  
		she really make an effort to patch 
		up relations with  
		Washington that had been so damaged by her 
		 
		predecessor? At most, it was a half-hearted one. 
		 
		The tone of trans-Atlantic relations may have improved,  
		former US 
		Ambassador to Germany William Timken  
		wrote in a cable to the State 
		Department at the end of  
		2006, but the chancellor "has not taken bold 
		steps yet to 
 improve the substantive content of the relationship."  
		That 
		is not exactly high praise. 
		 
		And the verdict on German Foreign Minister Guido  
		Westerwelle? His 
		thoughts "were short on substance," 
 wrote the current US ambassador in 
		Berlin, Philip Murphy, 
 in a cable. The reason, Murphy suggested, was 
		that  
		"Westerwelle's command of complex foreign and security  
		policy 
		issues still requires deepening." 
		 
		Such comments are hardly friendly. But in the eyes of the 
 American 
		diplomatic corps, every actor is quickly  
		categorized as a friend or foe. 
		King Abdullah of Saudi  
		Arabia? A friend: Abdullah can't stand his 
		neighbors in  
		Iran and, expressing his disdain for the mullah regime, 
		 
		said, "there is no doubt something unstable about them 
		." And his ally, 
		Sheikh bin Zayed of Abu Dhabi? Also a  
		friend. He believes "a near term 
		conventional war with Iran  
		is clearly preferable to the long term 
		consequences of a  
		nuclear armed Iran." 
		 
		Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's emissaries also learn  
		of a special 
		"Iran observer" in the Azerbaijani capital of  
		Baku who reports on a 
		dispute that played out during a 
 meeting of Iran's Supreme National 
		Security Council. An 
 enraged Revolutionary Guard Chief of Staff Mohammed 
		 
		Ali Jafari allegedly got into a heated argument with  
		Mahmoud Ahmadinejad 
		and slapped him in the face  
		because the generally conservative president 
		had,  
		surprisingly, advocated freedom of the press. 
		 
		A Political Meltdown 
		 
		Such surprises from the annals of US diplomacy will  
		dominate the 
		headlines in the coming days when the 
 New York Times, London's Guardian, 
		Paris' Le Monde, 
 Madrid's El Pais and SPIEGEL begin shedding light on 
		 
		the treasure trove of secret documents from the State  
		Department. 
		Included are 243,270 diplomatic cables  
		filed by US embassies to the 
		State Department and 8,017 
 directives that the State Department sent to 
		its diplomatic 
 outposts around the world. In the coming days, the 
 participating media will show in a series of investigative 
 stories how 
		America seeks to steer the world. The  
		development is no less than a 
		political meltdown for 
 American foreign policy. 
		 
		Never before in history has a superpower lost control of  
		such vast 
		amounts of such sensitive information -- data  
		that can help paint a 
		picture of the foundation upon which 
 US foreign policy is built. Never 
		before has the trust 
 America's partners have in the country been as 
		badly  
		shaken. Now, their own personal views and policy  
		recommendations 
		have been made public -- as have  
		America's true views of them. 
		 
		For example, one can learn that German Defense Minister 
 Karl-Theodor zu 
		Guttenberg, the Germany's most beloved 
 politician according to public 
		opinion polls, openly  
		criticizes fellow cabinet member Guido Westerwelle 
		in  
		conversations with US diplomats, and even snitches on  
		him. Or that 
		Secretary of State Clinton wants her 
 ambassadors in Moscow and Rome to 
		inform her whether  
		there is anything to the rumors that Italian 
		President Silvio  
		Berlusconi and Vladimir Putin have private business 
		ties in 
 addition to their close friendship -- whispers that both have 
 vehemently denied. 
		 
		America's ambassadors can be merciless in their  
		assessments of the 
		countries in which they are stationed.  
		That's their job. Kenya? A swamp 
		of flourishing corruption  
		extending across the country. Fifteen 
		high-ranking Kenyan  
		officials are already banned from traveling to the 
		United  
		States, and almost every single sentence in the embassy 
 reports 
		speaks with disdain of the government of President 
 Mwai Kibaki and Prime 
		Minister Raila Odinga. 
		 
		Weighing Public Interest against Confidentiality 
		 
		Turkey hardly comes away any less scathed in the cables. 
 Prime Minister 
		Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the cables allege,  
		governs with the help of a 
		cabal of incompetent advisors.  
		Ankara Embassy officials depict a country 
		on a path to an  
		Islamist future -- a future that likely won't include 
		European 
 Union membership. 
		 
		As with the close to 92,000 documents on the war in  
		Afghanistan at the 
		end of July and the almost 400,000  
		documents on the Iraq war recently 
		released, the State  
		Department cables have also been leaked to the 
		WikiLeaks  
		whistleblower platform -- and they presumably came from 
 the 
		same source. As before, WikiLeaks has provided the 
		material to media 
		partners to review and analyze. 
		 
		With a team of more than 50 reporters and researchers,  
		SPIEGEL has 
		viewed, analyzed and vetted the mass of  
		documents. In most cases, the 
		magazine has sought to 
 protect the identities of the Americans' 
		informants, unless  
		the person who served as the informant was senior 
		enough  
		to be politically relevant. In some cases, the US government 
 expressed security concerns and SPIEGEL accepted a  
		number of such 
		objections. In other cases, however,  
		SPIEGEL felt the public interest in 
		reporting the news was  
		greater than the threat to security. Throughout 
		our research, 
 SPIEGEL reporters and editors weighed the public interest 
		 
		against the justified interest of countries in security and 
		 
		confidentiality. 
		 
		In a statement, a spokesperson for the White House  
		condemned the 
		impending publication of the documents  
		by WikiLeaks as "reckless and 
		dangerous." The cables, 
 which contain "candid and often incomplete 
		information," 
 are not an expression of policy and do not always shape 
		 
		final policy decisions, the statement reads. "Such  
		disclosures put at 
		risk our diplomats, intelligence  
		professionals, and people around the 
		world," the 
 spokesperson said. The fact that "private conversations" 
 are 
		now being made public "can deeply impact not only 
 US foreign policy 
		interests, but those of our allies and  
		friends around the world." 
		 
		It is now possible to view many political developments 
 around the world 
		through the lens of those who  
		participated in those events. As such, our 
		understanding 
 of those events is deeply enriched. That alone is often 
		 
		enough to place transparency ahead of national  
		regulations regarding 
		confidentiality. 
		 
		Following the leaks of military secrets from Afghanistan 
 and Iraq, these 
		leaks now put US diplomats on the hot 
 seat. It is the third coup for 
		WikiLeaks within six months,  
		and it is one that is likely to leave 
		Washington feeling  
		more than a bit exposed. Around half of the cables 
		that  
		have been obtained aren't classified and slightly less,  
		40.5 
		percent, as classified as "confidential." Six percent  
		of the reports, or 
		16,652 cables, are labelled as "secret"  
		and of those, 4,330 are so 
		explosive that they are labelled  
		"NOFORN," meaning access should not be 
		made available 
 to non-US nationals. Taken together, the cables provide 
 enough raw text to fill 66 years' worth of weekly SPIEGEL 
 magazines. 
		 
		Gossip and the Unvarnished Truth 
		 
		Much in the material was noted and sent because those 
 compiling the 
		reports or their dialogue partners believed,  
		with some certainty, that 
		their transcripts would not be  
		made public for the next 25 years. That 
		may also explain 
 why the ambassadors and emissaries from Washington 
 were 
		so willing to report gossip and hearsay back to State 
 Department 
		headquarters. One cable from the Moscow  
		Embassy on Russian first lady 
		Svetlana Medvedeva, for 
 example, states that she is "generating tensions 
		between  
		the camps and remains the subject of avid gossip." It then 
 goes 
		on to report that President Medvedev's wife had  
		already drawn up a list 
		of officials who should be made to  
		"suffer" in their careers because 
		they had been disloyal to 
 Medvedev. Another reports that the wife of 
		Azerbaijan 
 leader Ilham Aliyev has had so much plastic surgery that 
 it 
		is possible to confuse her for one of her daughters from 
 a distance, but 
		that she can barely still move her face. 
		 
		What makes the documents particularly appealing, though, 
 is that many 
		politicians speak the unvarnished truth,  
		confident as they are that 
		their musings will never be  
		made public. 
		 
		What, though, do the thousands of documents prove?  
		Do they really show a 
		US which has the world on a leash? 
 Are Washington's embassies still 
		self-contained power 
 centers in their host countries? 
		 
		In sum, probably not. In the major crisis regions, an image 
 emerges of a 
		superpower that can no longer truly be  
		certain of its allies -- like in 
		Pakistan, where the Americans 
 are consumed by fear that the unstable 
		nuclear power  
		could become precisely the place where terrorists obtain 
		 
		dangerous nuclear material. 
		 
		There are similar fears in Yemen, where the US, against  
		its better 
		judgement, allows itself to be instrumentalized  
		by an unscrupulous 
		leader. With American military aid 
 that was intended for the fight 
		against al-Qaida, Ali  
		Abdullah Saleh is now able to wage his battle 
		against 
 enemy tribes in the northern part of the country. 
		 
		Insult to Injury 
		 
		Even after the fall of Saddam Hussein, it still remained a  
		challenge for 
		the victorious power to assert its will on Iraq. 
 In Baghdad, which has 
		seen a series of powerful US  
		ambassadors -- men the international press 
		often like to r 
		efer to as American viceroys -- it is now up to Vice 
		President  
		Joe Biden to make repeated visits to allied Iraqi politicians 
		 
		in an effort to get them to finally establish a respectable  
		democracy. 
		But the embassy cables make it very clear that  
		Obama's deputy has made 
		little headway. 
		 
		Instead, the Americans are forced to endure the endless  
		tirades of 
		Egyptian President Hosni Mubarek, who claims to 
 have always known that 
		the Iraq war was the "biggest  
		mistake ever committed" and who advised 
		the Americans to 
 "forget about democracy in Iraq." Once the US forces 
		depart, 
 Mubarak said, the best way to ensure a peaceful transition is 
 for there to be a military coup. They are statements that add 
 insult to 
		injury. 
		 
		On the whole, the cables from the Middle East expose the  
		superpower's 
		weaknesses. Washington has always viewed it 
 as vital to its survival to 
		secure its share of energy reserves, 
 but the world power is often 
		quickly reduced to becoming a 
 plaything of diverse interests. And it is 
		drawn into the  
		animosities between Arabs and Israelis, Shiites and 
		Sunnis, 
 between Islamists and secularists, between despots and  
		kings. 
		Often enough, the lesson of the documents that have 
 now been obtained, 
		is that the Arab leaders use their friends 
 in Washington to expand their 
		own positions of power. 
		 
		--- 
		 
		Related articles, information and video: 
		 
		Russians Refuted US Claim of Iranian Missile Threat to  
		Europe (Nov 30, 
		2010) 
		
		http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=53720 
		Washington - A diplomatic cable from last February released 
 by Wikileaks 
		provides a detailed account of how Russian  
		specialists on the Iranian 
		ballistic missile programme refuted 
 the U.S. suggestion that Iran has 
		missiles that could target  
		European capitals or intends to develop such 
		a capability.In  
		fact, the Russians challenged the very existence of the 
		 
		mystery missile the U.S. claims Iran acquired from North  
		Korea. But 
		readers of the two leading U.S. newspapers never 
 learned those key facts 
		about the document. The New York  
		Times and Washington Post reported only 
		that the United  
		States believed Iran had acquired such missiles - 
		supposedly  
		called the BM-25 - from North Korea. Neither newspaper 
		 
		reported the detailed Russian refutation of the U.S. view on 
 the issue 
		or the lack of hard evidence for the BM-25 from 
 the U.S. side. CLIP 
		 
		Israel gets a pass in new 'Wikileaks' - Focus is on Iran  
		(NOVEMBER 28, 
		2010) 
		
		http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/2010/11/israel- 
		
		gets-pass-in-new-wikileaks-focus.html 
		Julian Assange said the release of classified US documents  
		will cover 
		"every major issue" in the world while Benjamin  
		Netanyahu said material 
		concerning Israel will not be the  
		focal point of a new exposé by the 
		whistle-blowing website 
 WikiLeaks. "Israel is not the center of 
		international attention"  
		declared a confident Netanyahu.You can't have 
		it both ways 
 fellows. Israel does stand at the center of every major 
		issue 
 in the middle east and in manipulating U.S. foreign policy.  
		There 
		will be nothing new revealed about the crimes of Israel 
 but plenty about 
		their 'enemies.' U.S. spying is featured but  
		Israeli spying seems to be 
		missing.From the JPost ... note 
 that one of the first 'leaks' to come 
		out and promoted by the 
 Israeli press is about North Korea and linking 
		them to Iran. 
 Very convenient in light of the present North and South 
		 
		Korea 'crisis.' Barak encourages attack on Iran, N. Korea.  
		The document, 
		dated June 2, 2009 and sent from the 
 American Embassy in Tel Aviv, 
		details Barak's visit with a  
		two Congressional delegations. It quotes 
		Barak as saying  
		that "'no option should be removed from the table' when 
		 
		confronting Iran and North Korea.""Barak asked rhetorically 
 how a lack 
		of firm response to North Korea would be  
		interpreted by Iran's 
		leadership, speculating the US  
		government would be viewed as a 'paper 
		tiger'," the  
		diplomatic cable reads. CLIP 
		 
		Secret US Embassy Cables 
		
		http://cablegate.wikileaks.org/ 
		Wikileaks began on Sunday November 28th publishing  
		251,287 leaked United 
		States embassy cables, the largest  
		set of confidential documents ever to 
		be released into the 
 public domain. The documents will give people 
		around  
		the world an unprecedented insight into US Government  
		foreign 
		activities. The cables, which date from 1966 up 
 until the end of 
		February this year, contain confidential  
		communications between 274 
		embassies in countries 
 throughout the world and the State Department in 
		 
		Washington DC. 15,652 of the cables are classified Secret.  
		The embassy 
		cables will be released in stages over the  
		next few months. The subject 
		matter of these cables is of  
		such importance, and the geographical 
		spread so broad,  
		that to do otherwise would not do this material 
		justice.  
		The cables show the extent of US spying on its allies and  
		the 
		UN; turning a blind eye to corruption and human rights  
		abuse in "client 
		states"; backroom deals with supposedly 
 neutral countries; lobbying for 
		US corporations; and the  
		measures US diplomats take to advance those who 
		have  
		access to them. This document release reveals the 
 contradictions 
		between the US’s public persona and what 
 it says behind closed doors – 
		and shows that if citizens 
 in a democracy want their governments to 
		reflect their 
 wishes, they should ask to see what’s going on behind the 
 scenes. Every American schoolchild is taught that George  
		Washington – 
		the country’s first President – could not tell 
 a lie. If the 
		administrations of his successors lived up to  
		the same principle, 
		today’s document flood would be a  
		mere embarrassment. Instead, the US 
		Government has  
		been warning governments -- even the most corrupt -- 
		 
		around the world about the coming leaks and is bracing  
		itself for the 
		exposures. The full set consists of 251,287  
		documents, comprising 
		261,276,536 words (seven times 
 the size of "The Iraq War Logs", the 
		world's previously  
		largest classified information release). The cables 
		cover  
		from 28th December 1966 to 28th February 2010 and  
		originate from 
		274 embassies, consulates and diplomatic 
 missions. How to explore the 
		data - Search for events 
 that you remember that happened for example 
		in your 
 country. You can browse by date or search for an origin  
		near 
		you. Pick out interesting events and tell others about  
		them. Use 
		twitter, reddit, mail whatever suits your audience 
 best. 
		 
		WikiLeaks Documents Show Hillary Clinton Authorized US 
 to Spy on Foreign 
		Diplomats (29 November 2010) 
		
		http://www.truth-out.org/wikileaks-documents-show-hillary 
		
		-clinton-authorized-us-spy-foreign-diplomats65506 
		As the WikiLeaks documents steadily reveal more and more 
 controversial 
		actions taken by the government in its  
		international operations, one 
		report from July 2009 shows  
		Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 
		authorizing US diplomats 
 to spy and collect personal information on 
		members of  
		foreign agencies.(...) The cable also requested the "current 
 technical specifications, physical layout, and planned  
		upgrades to 
		telecommunications infrastructure and 
 information systems, networks, and 
		technologies used by  
		top officials and their support staffs," as well as 
		"details on 
 commercial and private VIP networks used for official 
		 
		communications, to include upgrades, security measures,  
		passwords, 
		personal encryption keys, and types of VPN  
		versions used."In a statement 
		on November 28, 2010, White 
 House press secretary Robert Gibbs said the 
		documents  
		were "not an expression of policy," but could nevertheless 
 "compromise private discussions with foreign governments  
		and opposition 
		leaders." "President Obama supports  
		responsible, accountable, and open 
		government at home  
		and around the world, but this reckless and dangerous 
		action 
 runs counter to that goal. By releasing stolen and classified 
		 
		documents, Wikileaks has put at risk not only the cause of  
		human rights 
		but also the lives and work of these individuals. 
 We condemn in the 
		strongest terms the unauthorized 
 disclosure of classified documents and 
		sensitive national  
		security information."Clinton held a press briefing 
		Monday 
 to respond to the leak and said that the U.S. "deeply  
		regrets" 
		the release of classified information, promising  
		to take bold action 
		against the theft."I want to make clear 
 that our official foreign policy 
		is not set through these  
		messages, but here in Washington," Clinton 
		said. "I would  
		also add that to the American people and to our friends 
		 
		and partners … we are taking aggressive steps to hold  
		responsible those 
		who stole this information." 
		 
		AN INTERACTIVE ATLAS OF THE DIPLOMATIC CABLES 
		
		http://www.spiegel.de/flash/flash-24861.html 
		A time lapse of 251,287 documents: The world map shows  
		where the 
		majority of the cables originated from, and where  
		they had the highest 
		level of classification. 
		 
		A cache of diplomatic cables provides a chronicle of the 
 United States' 
		relations with the world. 
		
		http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/statessecrets.html 
		 
		Iran Fortifies Its Arsenal With the Aid of North Korea  
		(November 28, 
		2010) 
		
		http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/world/middleeast/ 
		
		29missiles.html 
		Secret American intelligence assessments have concluded 
 that Iran has 
		obtained a cache of advanced missiles, based 
 on a Russian design, that 
		are much more powerful than 
 anything Washington has publicly conceded 
		that Tehran 
 has in its arsenal, diplomatic cables show. Iran obtained 
 19 
		of the missiles from North Korea, according to a cable  
		dated Feb. 24 of 
		this year. The cable is a detailed, highly 
 classified account of a 
		meeting between top Russian 
 officials and an American delegation led by 
		Vann H. Van  
		Diepen, an official with the State Department's 
 nonproliferation division who, as a national intelligence 
 officer 
		several years ago, played a crucial role in the 2007 
 assessment of 
		Iran's nuclear capacity. The missiles could  
		for the first time give Iran 
		the capacity to strike at capitals  
		in Western Europe or easily reach 
		Moscow, and American  
		officials warned that their advanced propulsion 
		could  
		speed Iran's development of intercontinental ballistic  
		missiles. 
		There has been scattered but persistent  
		speculation on the topic since 
		2006, when fragmentary  
		reports surfaced that North Korea might have sold 
		Iran 
 missiles based on a Russian design called the R-27, 
 once used 
		aboard Soviet submarines to carry nuclear 
 warheads. In the unclassified 
		world, many arms control  
		experts concluded that isolated components made 
		their 
 way to Iran, but there has been little support for the idea  
		that 
		complete missiles, with their huge thrusters, had  
		been secretly shipped. 
		The Feb. 24 cable, which is among 
 those obtained by WikiLeaks and made 
		available to a 
 number of news organizations, makes it clear that 
		 
		American intelligence agencies believe that the complete  
		shipment indeed 
		took place, and that Iran is taking pains 
 to master the technology in an 
		attempt to build a new 
 generation of missiles. The missile intelligence 
		also 
 suggests far deeper military - and perhaps nuclear -  
		cooperation 
		between North Korea and Iran than was  
		previously known. At the request 
		of the Obama  
		administration, The New York Times has agreed not to 
 publish the text of the cable.The North Korean version of 
 the advanced 
		missile, known as the BM-25, could carry 
 a nuclear warhead. Many experts 
		say that Iran remains  
		some distance from obtaining a nuclear warhead, 
		 
		especially one small enough to fit atop a missile, though 
 they believe 
		that it has worked hard to do so. Still, the  
		BM-25 would be a 
		significant step up for Iran. CLIP 
		 
		Wiki-Leaks Serves Israeli Agenda Of Demonizing Iran  
		(30 Nov 2010) 
		
		http://www.sott.net/articles/show/218807 
		 
		The US Embassy Cables 
		
		http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/the-us-embassy-cables 
		 
		WikiLeaks cables expose Pakistan nuclear fears  
		(30 November 2010) 
		
		http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/30/wikileaks- 
		
		cables-pakistan-nuclear-fears 
		 
		US and UK diplomats warn of terrorists getting hold of 
		fissile material 
		and of Pakistan-India nuclear exchange -- 
 American and British diplomats 
		fear Pakistan's nuclear  
		weapons programme could lead to fissile material 
		falling 
 into the hands of terrorists or a devastating nuclear  
		exchange 
		with India. The latest cache of US embassy 
		cables released by WikiLeaks 
		contains warnings that  
		Pakistan is rapidly building its nuclear 
		stockpile despite  
		the country's growing instability and "pending 
		economic  
		catastrophe". Mariot Leslie, a senior British Foreign Office 
 official, told US diplomats in September 2009: "The UK 
 has deep concerns 
		about the safety and security of 
 Pakistan's nuclear weapons," according 
		to one cable  
		classified "secret/noforn [no foreign nationals]". Seven 
 months earlier the US ambassador to Islamabad, Anne 
 Patterson, cabled to 
		Washington: "Our major concern is  
		not having an Islamic militant steal 
		an entire weapon but 
 rather the chance someone working in government of 
 Pakistan facilities could gradually smuggle enough 
 material out to 
		eventually make a weapon." The leak of  
		classified US diplomatic 
		correspondence exposes in 
 detail the deep tensions between Washington 
		and  
		Islamabad over a broad range of issues, including  
		counter-terrorism, 
		Afghanistan and finance, as well as  
		the nuclear question. The cables 
		also revealed that: 
 * Small teams of US special forces have been 
		operating  
		secretly inside Pakistan's tribal areas, with Pakistani 
		 
		government approval, while senior ministers have 
 privately supported US 
		drone attacks. * The ambassador 
 starkly informed Washington that "no 
		amount of money" 
 from the US would stop the Pakistani army backing 
 Islamist militants and the Afghan Taliban insurgency. 
 * The US concluded 
		Pakistani troops were responsible 
 for a spate of extrajudicial killings 
		in the Swat Valley 
 and tribal belt but decided not to comment publicly 
		to  
		allow the army to take action on its own. * Diplomats 
 in Islamabad 
		were asked by the Pentagon to survey  
		refugee camps on the Afghan border, 
		possibly for air 
 strike targeting information. * The president, Asif  
		Ali 
		Zardari - whose wife, Benazir Bhutto was  
		assassinated - has made 
		extensive preparations in 
 case he too is killed, and once told the US 
		vice- 
		president, Joe Biden, that he feared the military "might 
 take me 
		out". Pakistan's rulers are so sensitive about 
 their much-prized nuclear 
		weapons that in July 2009  
		they stalled on a previously agreed plan for 
		the US to  
		recover and dispose of highly enriched uranium spent 
 fuel from 
		a nuclear research reactor, in the interests of 
 preventing proliferation 
		and theft. They told the US  
		embassy: "If the local media got word of the 
		fuel removal, 
 "they certainly would portray it as the US taking 
		 
		Pakistan's nuclear weapons". US fears over Pakistan were 
 spelled out in 
		an intelligence briefing in 2008. "Despite 
 pending economic catastrophe, 
		Pakistan is
		
		producing   
		
		nuclear weapons at a faster rate than any other country in 
		 
		the world," the secret cable said. CLIP 
		 
		U.S. Chases Foreign Leaders' DNA, WikiLeaks Shows 
 (November 29, 2010) 
		
		http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/11/u-s-chases- 
		
		foreign-leaders-dna-wikileaks-shows/ 
		 
		Foreign potentates and diplomats beware: the United States 
 wants your 
		DNA.If that chief of mission seemed a bit too  
		friendly at the last 
		embassy party, it might be because the  
		State Department recently 
		instructed U.S. diplomats to  
		collect biometric identification on their 
		foreign interlocutors. 
 The search for the most personal information of 
		all is  
		contained in WikiLeaks' latest publication of tens of 
 thousands 
		of sensitive diplomatic cables.A missive from  
		the Secretary of State's 
		office in April 2009 asked diplomats 
 in Africa to step up their 
		assistance to U.S. intelligence.  
		Not only should diplomats in Burundi, 
		Rwanda and Congo  
		collect basic biographical information on the people 
		they  
		talk to - a routine diplomatic function - but they should also 
 gather "fingerprints, facial images, DNA, and iris scans."  
		CLIP 
		 
		Why Wikileaks is Good for Democracy  
		(November 30, 2010) Yeah, yeah... 
		 
		And peeing is good for everyone! 
		
		http://www.counterpunch.org/quigley11302010.html 
		 
		Since 9-11, the US government, through Presidents Bush 
 and Obama, has 
		increasingly told the US public that  
		"state secrets" will not be shared 
		with citizens. Candidate 
 Obama pledged to reduce the use of state 
		secrets, but  
		President Obama continued the Bush tradition. The 
 Courts 
		and Congress and international allies have gone 
 meekly along with the 
		escalating secrecy demands of  
		the US Executive. By labeling tens of 
		millions of  
		documents secret, the US government has created a  
		huge 
		vacuum of information. But information is the 
 lifeblood of democracy. 
		Information about government 
 contributes to a healthy democracy. 
		Transparency and  
		accountability are essential elements of good 
		 
		government. Likewise, "a lack of government  
		transparency and 
		accountability undermines  
		democracy and gives rise to cynicism and 
		mistrust, 
		" according to a 2008 Harris survey commissioned by 
 the 
		Association of Government Accountants. Into the 
 secrecy vacuum stepped 
		Private Bradley Manning, who, 
 according to the Associated Press, was 
		able to defeat  
		"Pentagon security systems using little more than a  
		Lady 
		Gaga CD and a portable computer memory stick 
		."Manning apparently sent 
		the information to Wikileaks 
 - a non profit media organization, which 
		specializes  
		in publishing leaked information. Wikileaks in turn 
 shared 
		the documents to other media around the world 
 including the New York 
		Times and published much of  
		it on its website. CLIP - NOTE from Jean: 
		Don't you think 
 that this crappy explanation about how a 22 year old 
 "hacker" managed to circumvent the most sophisticated 
 cyber protection 
		money can buy using only a "Lady  
		Gaga CD and a portable computer memory 
		stick" is just 
 as implausible as the discovery, minutes after the  
		planes 
		crashed into the World Trade Center, of evidence 
 linking a group of 
		Saudi terrorist to this false flag  
		attack?... This poor Bradley Manning 
		is just a fall guy, 
 a "patsy scapegoat sucker dupe victim stooge 
		 
		whipping boy" paraded in front of the propaganda  
		media to "explain" 
		those darn leaks... Oh! and BTW  
		just like Osama Bin Laden, they will 
		never "catch"  
		Julian Assange... Well as long as he will be useful to 
 them... But some are getting so 'excited' about this  
		that someone in the 
		inner circle of Stephen Harper is 
 even calling for his death:
		
		Censors block  
		
		WikiLeaks website; Interpol issues arrest order; 
		
		 Canada 
		demands Assange be killed 
		 
		Cyberattack Against WikiLeaks Was Weak 
 (November 29, 2010)  
		A 
		MAKE-BELIEVE SMOKESCREEN ATTACK FOR 
 PLAUSIBLE DENIAL PURPOSE?  
		 
		"Look! We 
		tried to punish them so everyone knows we 
 are angry at them. It cannot 
		possibly be us who are  
		behing these darn leaks!" 
		
		http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/11/wikileaks 
		
		-attack/ 
		In the first test of WikiLeaks' resiliency since a staff  
		rebellion 
		earlier this year, the organization recovered  
		within hours from a 
		distributed denial-of-service attack 
 during its rollout of leaked State 
		Department cables  
		Sunday. But experts who monitored the disruptive 
		traffic 
 say the attack was relatively modest in size.WikiLeaks' 
 main web 
		address and its "cablegate" site were  
		unreachable as the organization's 
		media partners  
		published their first analyses from a massive trove of a 
 quarter-million U.S. diplomatic cables Sunday  
		afternoon. Hours earlier, 
		WikiLeaks wrote on Twitter:  
		"We are currently under a mass distributed 
		denial-of- 
		service attack." But Arbor Networks, which analyzes  
		malicious 
		network traffic crossing the internet's  
		backbones, reports that the DDoS 
		generated between 
 2 and 4 Gbps of disruptive traffic, slightly above the 
		 
		average for all DDoS attacks, but well below the peak 
 60 to 100 Gbps 
		consumed by truly massive attacks  
		against other websites over the last 
		year. CLIP 
		 
		WikiLeaks Reveals Iran's Secret, Worldwide Arms Hunt 
 (November 28, 2010) 
		
		http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/11/wikileaks 
		
		-reveals-irans-secret-worldwide-arms-hunt/ 
		 
		Guns and ammo from Turkey. Missile components from 
 Germany. Guidance 
		systems from China. Iran is on a  
		global, clandestine mission to acquire 
		weapons and  
		weapons technologies of all sorts, diplomatic cables 
		 
		released Sunday by WikiLeaks reveal. And the Tehran  
		regime is using a 
		series of front companies in its attempt 
 to assemble the arsenal. In a 
		cable from February of 2010,  
		State Department officials in Washington 
		alert the staff at 
 the U.S. embassy in Beijing that a Malaysia-based 
		firm,  
		Electronics Component Limited (ECL), is trying to buy 
 three-axis 
		fiber optic gyroscopes from a Chinese  
		company. This isn't just a simple 
		business deal, the  
		dispatch makes clear. Gyroscopes measure orientation, 
		 
		which makes them a critical component of weapons'  
		inertial navigation 
		systems. These particular gyroscopes, 
 the State Department warns, "would 
		be suitable for use 
 in the guidance systems of ballistic missiles, 
		cruise  
		missiles, and unmanned aerial vehicles."Worse, the cable 
 adds, 
		"ECL is part of a network of Iranian-controlled front 
 companies that… 
		procures sensitive goods on behalf of  
		a number of Iranian entities of 
		proliferation concern,  
		including the Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group 
		(SHIG),  
		which is Iran's primary developer of liquid propellant  
		ballistic 
		missiles." The warning is part of a common  
		thread emerging from 
		WikiLeaks' three major document  
		dumps. These diplomatic dispatches, 
		along with war logs 
 from Afghanistan and Iraq, detail a globe-spanning 
		Cold  
		War between Iran and the United States. Each side has 
 its proxies, 
		each side provides weapons to those allies,  
		and each side uses the game 
		of global diplomacy to  
		corral the other's ambitions. "The metaphor most 
		 
		commonly deployed by Jordanian officials when  
		discussing Iran is of an 
		octopus whose tentacles reach  
		out insidiously to manipulate, foment, and 
		undermine 
 the best laid plans of the West and regional moderates, 
		" one 
		WikiLeaked cable reports. CLIP 
		 
		Will Israel Attack Iran By Christmas? (28 NOV 2010) 
		
		http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_ 
		
		dish/2010/11/will-israel-attack-iran-by-christmas.html 
		 
		To me, the most revealing parts of the Wikileaks diplo- 
		docu-dump are 
		about the Middle East. We already knew 
 that the Sunni Arab autocrats 
		cannot bear the thought 
 of a Shiite nuclear bomb and are almost as 
		worried as  
		the Israelis. But now the evidentiary proof brings it 
		home: 
		The Saudi king was recorded as having "frequently  
		exhorted the US 
		to attack Iran to put an end to its nuclear 
 weapons programme", one 
		cable stated. "He told you 
 [Americans] to cut off the head of the 
		snake," the Saudi 
 ambassador to Washington, Adel al-Jubeir said, 
		 
		according to a report on Abdullah's meeting with the US 
 general David 
		Petraeus in April 2008.The cables also  
		highlight Israel's anxiety to 
		preserve its regional nuclear 
 monopoly, its readiness to go it alone 
		against Iran –  
		and its unstinting attempts to influence American policy 
		. 
		The defence minister, Ehud Barak, estimated in June  
		2009 that there was 
		a window of "between six and 18  
		months from now in which stopping Iran 
		from acquiring 
 nuclear weapons might still be viable". After that, Barak 
 said, "any military solution would result in unacceptable 
 collateral 
		damage."Officials in Jordan and Bahrain have 
 openly called for Iran's 
		nuclear programme to be stopped 
 by any means, including military. 
		Leaders in Saudi Arabia, 
 the United Arab Emirates and Egypt referred to 
		Iran as 
 "evil", an "existential threat" and a power that "is going 
 to 
		take us to war".If we take Barak's word for it, the Israelis 
 could 
		launch World War III within a month. And would  
		carry much of the Sunni 
		Arab autocrats with it. One notes 
 that Saudi foreign diplomats and 
		functionaries are more 
 wary about war with Iran than the royals. But 
		there seems 
 little discussion about the momentous consequences of  
		a 
		third war launched by the West against a Muslim country 
 in less than a 
		decade. 
		 
		WikiLeaks Reveals Everybody's Christmas List:  
		The World Wants Drones 
		(November 29, 2010) 
		
		http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/11/wikileaks 
		
		-reveals-everybodys-christmas-list-the-world-wants-drones/ 
		 
		Black Friday has passed, but the holidays are upon us and  
		shopping days 
		are increasingly few. Having a hard time 
 finding the perfect gift for 
		that tiny emirate hoping to 
 psych out Iran or the large NATO ally 
		looking to fight  
		terrorism in Iraq? Fortunately for you, WikiLeaks has 
		r 
		evealed the number one item atop seemingly everybody's 
 wish list: 
		drones. Only a select few close American allies 
 have the 
		export-restricted Predator B (a.k.a. MQ-9 Reaper) 
 armed drones, but that 
		hasn't stopped countries from the 
 United Arab Emirates to Turkey from 
		pestering & pleading 
 with America to sell them the shiniest new toy, the 
		 
		WikiLeaks document show. The United Arab Emirates, a 
 tiny nation of 5 
		million already protected by a U.S. military 
 presence in the country, 
		has been looking to purchase  
		only the latest and greatest military 
		technology for a while  
		now, outbuying Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and 
		Taiwan to  
		become the American military's top buyer last fiscal year.  
		The 
		WikiLeaks documents show that in 2007, UAE officials 
 pressed then Air 
		Force chief of staff General Michael  
		Moseley and then Central Command 
		chief General John  
		Abizaid during official visits to sell them the armed 
		 
		Predator B drone as part of their shopping spree. CLIP 
		 
		Blocked! WikiLeaks Shows How Iran's Air Defense Deal  
		Died (November 29, 
		2010) 
		
		http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/11/blocked- 
		
		wikileaks-shows-how-irans-air-defense-deal-died/ 
		 
		For two years, U.S. diplomats and Israeli leaders steadily 
 implored 
		Russia not to sell Iran a powerful anti-aircraft 
 missile that both 
		feared could turn air strikes against 
		Iranian nuclear facilities into a 
		fiasco. Stopping the sale 
 of the S-300 missile, an issue obscure to all 
		but  
		obsessive observers of the region, became a secret test 
 for American 
		diplomacy at the highest levels."For better 
 or for worse," John Beyrle, 
		the U.S. ambassador to  
		Russia cabled back to Washington in February 
		2009,  
		"the delivery of S-300's have become a barometer of  
		our bilateral 
		relations."It turned out to be a positive  
		indicator. In September, 
		Russian officials announced  
		the cancellation of a years-old agreement to 
		sell Iran a 
 potentially game-changing air defense system. The  
		Iranians 
		have been crying foul ever since, vowing to take  
		Russia to court over 
		the end of an arms transfer worth 
 an estimated $800 million. But it's 
		hardly a mere 
 financial issue. The S-300 can shoot down enemy 
 aircraft 
		from up to 200 kilometers away, making it a  
		system that "scares every 
		Western air force," in the  
		words of defense analyst Dan Goure. No wonder 
		the  
		U.S. and Israel worked aggressively to stop the sale - an 
 effort 
		whose scale is detailed in the diplomatic cables  
		released on Sunday by 
		the anti-secrecy organization  
		WikiLeaks. Almost as soon as the Obama 
		administration 
 came into office, diplomats in the Mideast were ordered 
		 
		to turn regional fears of Iran into pressure on Russia not 
 to follow 
		through on the missile sale. CLIP 
		 
		WikiLeaks' Cablegate: The Taiwanese Animated Version 
 - EXCELLENT AND 
		FUNNY! 
		
		http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/11/cablegate- 
		
		animated/ 
		 
		The Taiwanese news-animation company NMA has  
		distilled the global 
		diplomatic furor sparked by the State 
 Department cable leak into a 
		90-second computer  
		generated highlight reel. Think of it as worldwide 
		anarchy 
 in a CGI format. 
		 
		Sweden issues international arrest warrant for WikiLeaks  
		founder Assange 
		(19 November 2010) 
		
		http://wsws.org/articles/2010/nov2010/assa-n19.shtml 
		 
		Swedish authorities, stepping up their persecution of  
		WikiLeaks founder 
		Julian Assange, have issued an  
		international arrest warrant for his 
		detention in relation to 
 trumped-up “rape” charges.Sweden’s Director of 
		 
		Prosecution, Marianne Ny, claims that Assange needs to be 
 questioned. 
		“So far, we have not been able to meet with  
		him to accomplish the 
		interrogations,” she said. The court 
 ruling will allow prosecutors to 
		seek assistance from other 
 nations to have him arrested.The case against 
		Assange is  
		aimed at discrediting or weakening WikiLeaks, which has  
		made 
		public hundreds of thousands of secret US 
 documents exposing the 
		criminal character of the 
 invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and 
		Iraq.  
		(See “ 
		The 
		WikiLeaks documents and the rape of Iraq”)  
		 
		The Swedish prosecutor’s 
		campaign has all the hallmarks  
		of a “dirty tricks” operation organized 
		or encouraged by  
		either the Pentagon or the CIA, or both. The charges 
		have  
		nothing to do with sexual assault, despite screaming media 
 headlines. They relate to Assange’s encounters this past  
		summer with two 
		Swedish women. Rebutting prosecutor 
 Ny’s comments in a strongly worded 
		statement Tuesday, 
 Mark Stephens, one of Assange’s British lawyers, 
		explained 
 that the allegations “do not constitute what any advanced 
		 
		legal system considers to be rape; as various media outlets 
 have 
		reported ‘the basis for the rape charge’ purely seems  
		to constitute a 
		post-facto dispute over consensual, but 
 unprotected sex days after the 
		event.”The charges against 
 Assange were, in fact, properly dropped last 
		August within  
		24 hours by chief prosecutor Eva Finne, who found there 
 was no “reason to suspect that he [Assange] had  
		committed rape.” 
		However, Assange’s identity had already 
 been unlawfully disclosed to the 
		right-wing media by the  
		Swedish authorities. Stephens asserts, “The so 
		called ‘rape 
		’ story was carried around the world and has caused Mr. 
		 
		Assange and his organization irreparable harm.” CLIP -  
		More through
		The 
		Persecution of WikiLeaks 
		 
		WikiLeaks : dans les coulisses de la diplomatie américaine 
		
		http://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2010/11/28/ 
		
		wikileaks-dans-les-coulisses-de-la-diplomatie-americaine_ 
		
		1446078_3210.html 
		 
		LOS PAPELES DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTADO 
		
		http://www.elpais.com/documentossecretos/. 
		 
		Pentagon to test 2nd near-space strike craft - Weapon  
		designed for 
		urgent threats (November 25, 2010) 
		
		http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/nov/25 
		
		/pentagon 
		
		-to-test-2nd-near-space-strike-craft/ 
		Defense Department scientists are set to conduct a second 
 test launch 
		next year of the Falcon HTV-2 experimental  
		superweapon after the first 
		flight this year ended when the 
 autopilot deliberately crashed the 
		unmanned glider into  
		the ocean as a safety measure.The Falcon Hypersonic 
		 
		Test Vehicle is designed to skim the top of the atmosphere  
		just below 
		space, and is a key element of the Pentagon's  
		Conventional Prompt Global 
		Strike (CPGS) capability - a  
		program to build non-nuclear strategic 
		weapons that can  
		strike conventionally anywhere in the world in less 
		than  
		an hour. (...) The $308 million Falcon HTV-2 is a suborbital 
 near-space vehicle launched on a Minotaur rocket, a  
		solid-fuel booster 
		built from a decommissioned ballistic  
		missile. On the very edge of the 
		atmosphere, in a procedure 
 called "clamshell payload fairing release," 
		the launch  
		missile deploys the plane, which is then supposed to glide 
 above the Earth at more than 13,000 miles per hour - more 
 than 20 times 
		the speed of sound. The Pentagon is  
		developing a generation of such 
		hypersonic weapons as  
		a way of being able to strike quickly at urgent 
		threats - such 
 as preparations by terrorists or rogue states to use 
		nuclear 
 weapons. The issue has been lent urgency by the recent  
		nuclear 
		arms treaty negotiated with Russia. Specialists 
		say the new generation 
		of hypersonic strike craft would  
		not count against the limits the treaty 
		places on strategic 
 weapons, although in treaty negotiations, U.S. 
		officials 
		promised to discuss the new weapons in a treaty 
 consultation 
		commission. CLIP -  
		COULD THIS BE USED IN A SURPRISE ATTACK  
		AGAINST 
		IRAN'S DEEP UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR 
 INSTALLATIONS? 
		 
		 
		"For the first time in history there is agreement that Iran 
		] is the 
		threat." 
		 
		- 
		Netanyahu 
		 
		"Wikileaks certainly is an interesting turn of events to say 
		] the least! 
		It has lit up the mainstream, the blogstream,  
		]and alterna-stream by 
		changing the traditional rules of 
		] the game quite a bit! A rattlesnake 
		never bites before it  
		]rattles its tail to warn its victim. Wikileaks 
		seems like it is 
		] being used to rattle to someone!. 
		 
		- Anonymous comment posted
		HERE 
		on 30 Nov 201O 
		 
		---- 
		 
		"In fact, this 'revelation' about Iran's capability to threaten 
 Europe 
		is even more believable than the 'sexed-up' Iraq  
		dossier claim, because 
		this revelation comes from  
		Wiki-leaks, an honest-to-god whistle blower 
		organization, 
 right? I mean, there's just no way that agents working on 
 behalf of the US and Israeli governments could possibly 
 use such an 
		organization to spread propaganda, right?  
		(...) Is there no one in the 
		alternative news community that 
 can see this for what it is? North Korea 
		supplying missiles 
 to Iran to attack Europe?! Right when the US and 
		Israel  
		are involved in a protracted effort to demonize Iran to the 
 world 
		and the US has an aircraft carrier sitting off the  
		Korean Coast!? Is all 
		of this meant to be so obvious, or did  
		my reading of 'psychological 
		operations for dummies' gift 
 me with amazing insight into how political 
		propaganda  
		really works? In determining the origin of the Wiki-leaks 
		 
		documents, we need ask ourselves but one question: in  
		whose interest is 
		it to put pressure on the US government 
 through the release of documents 
		to the press (via  
		Wiki-leaks) that force the US to do a certain amount 
		of  
		damage control, while simultaneously portraying Iran as  
		the biggest 
		threat to world peace? Because that, in the  
		final analysis, is the 
		overall effect of the Wiki-leaks  
		documents. Wiki-leaks performs so 
		poorly in the 'smell  
		test' that I feel confident in suggesting that the 
		documents 
 may not even be original documents; and if they are, they 
 have 
		very likely been amended in such a way that they  
		serve the 
		Israeli/Zionist agenda." 
		 
		- Joe Quinn - Taken from
		 
		Wiki-Leaks Serves 
		Israeli Agenda Of Demonizing Iran  
		below 
		 
		2. 
		 
		NOTE from Jean: After I wrote my lengthy intro note to the  
		previous 
		article I found this related comment below  
		expressing several similar 
		views... A MUST READ! 
		 
		From: 
		http://www.sott.net/articles/show/218807 
		 
		Wiki-Leaks Serves Israeli Agenda Of Demonizing Iran 
		 
		by - 30 Nov 2010 
		 
		I obviously missed the momentous occasion when the  
		mainstream media 
		turned anti-war. But who can now deny 
 that it is so when we see 
		Wiki-leaks and the mainstream 
 media joining forces to expose the ugly 
		truth of the US 
 invasions of Iraq, Afghanistan, and more recently, what 
 the US state department thinks of world leaders? I mean, 
 that is what is 
		happening, right? 
		 
		Wrong. 
		 
		What is happening is that Wiki-leaks is being promoted by 
		the media in 
		order to sell the same old lies, except that now  
		the lies are coming 
		sugar-coated, with a 'whistle-blower'  
		gloss to better enable digestion. 
		The lies themselves don't  
		frustrate me so much anymore, and I can 
		understand why 
 the general public are fooled, but I have to admit to 
		being 
 disappointed at how effortlessly the Wiki-leaks poison is 
 being 
		swallowed by so many supposedly alternative news 
 sites. Sites like 
		Counterpunch, Global Research, Citizens 
 for a Legitimate Government and 
		Information Clearing  
		House, to name but a few, are all disseminating the 
		 
		Wiki-leaks story without so much as a hint of critical 
 thought it seems. 
		 
		">From day one, the Wiki-leaks Afghan - and then Iraq -  
		war logs 
		revealed little if anything that was not already  
		publicly available: 
		 
		That the US uses assassination squads in Iraq and  
		Afghanistan? Old news. 
		Seven years ago the Guardian  
		
		informed us that not only were US 'hit squads' operating 
		 
		in Iraq, 
		but that they were being trained by the Israelis!  
		And in any case, is 
		the idea that 'hit squads' are being  
		used to track down the evil 
		'Taliban' in Afghanistan more  
		appalling than the fact, splashed across 
		American  
		broadsheets earlier this year, that Obama
		
		signed a bill  
		
		authorizing the assassination of American citizens by  
		
		the 
		CIA? 
		 
		That the US pays the Iraqi and Afghan media for positive 
 coverage is not 
		only old news, it's only half the story!  
		Have we already forgotten the 
		Lincoln Group and the  
		precocious Christian Bailey? In 2005 the Lincoln 
		group  
		won (was awarded) a $100 Million contract to essentially 
 control the entire 
		Iraqi media via its own 'Iraqi' 
 publications and the monopolization 
		of the Iraqi  
		advertising industry on an ongoing basis. All of these 
 details have been carried in the mainstream press, yet 
 they have done 
		nothing to stop the bogus endless 'war 
 on terrorism'. Why then are we 
		being encouraged to  
		expect that the Wikileaks documents, which convey 
		the 
 same information, will fare any better? Is it because 
 these details 
		will soon be consigned to the memory  
		hole (again) while other, more 
		strategically important, 
 details will be repeated ad nauseum? 
		 
		That the US has killed thousands of innocent civilians  
		in Iraq and 
		Afghanistan? Old news. In fact, on this one,  
		the Wiki-leaks documents 
		offered support for the much  
		lower estimation of deaths in Iraq and 
		Afghanistan by the 
 discredited 'Iraq Body Count' rather than the much more 
 realistic 
		estimation of almost 1.5 million (in Iraq) by 
 Just Foreign Policy 
		 
		But quibbling over the number of dead Muslims is not 
 important these 
		days anyway, after all, they're only  
		Muslims, not real people, and the 
		over-all exposure by the 
 mainstream media of US misdeeds in Iraq and 
		Afghanistan 
 is, in itself, no bad thing. If Wiki-leaks left it at that, 
		I would  
		be more than happy to applaud the mysterious Mr Assange  
		and the 
		equally mysterious provenance of his documents. 
 But the Wiki-leaks 
		documents tell much more than arbitrary 
 killing in wars of conquest, 
		they also provide support for 
 the continuation and expansion of those 
		wars, most notably 
 to Iran and Pakistan. 
		 
		For example, the Afghan 'war logs' offered 'evidence' that 
		 
		Pakistan is 
		helping the Taliban - that's Pakistan, and not,  
		as 
		has been reported, the CIA: 
		 
		Persistent accounts of western forces in Afghanistan using 
 their 
		helicopters to ferry Taleban fighters, strongly denied  
		by the military, 
		is feeding mistrust of the forces that are  
		supposed to be bringing order 
		to the country. 
		 
		One such tale came from a soldier from the 209th Shahin 
 Corps of the 
		Afghan National Army, fighting against the  
		growing insurgency in Kunduz 
		province in northern  
		Afghanistan. Over several months, he had taken part 
		in  
		several pitched battles against the armed opposition. 
		 
		"Just when the police and army managed to surround the 
 Taleban in a 
		village of Qala-e-Zaal district, we saw  
		helicopters land with support 
		teams," he said. "They 
 managed to rescue their friends from our 
		encirclement 
		, and even to inflict defeat on the Afghan National Army." 
		 
		The UK Guardian's
		
		summation of the Afghan war logs  
		was this: 
		 
		- How a secret "black" unit of special forces hunts down  
		Taliban leaders 
		for "kill or capture" without trial. 
		 
		- How the US covered up evidence that the Taliban have 
 acquired deadly 
		surface-to-air missiles. 
		 
		- How NATO commanders fear neighbouring Pakistan and 
 Iran are fueling 
		the insurgency. 
		 
		- How the Taliban have caused growing carnage with a  
		massive escalation 
		of their roadside bombing campaign,  
		which has killed more than 2,000 
		civilians to date. 
		 
		Are these the type of revelations that are going to cause 
 serious 
		problems for the US governments? Are they going 
 to outrage the public? 
		Having been conditioned for years  
		to believe that the 'Taliban' are evil 
		monsters, are people 
 going to be angry or quietly proud that a 'secret 
		special  
		forces unit' is hunting the Taliban down 'without trial'? 
		 
		Does the 'revelation' that the Taliban acquired surface-to-air 
 missiles 
		damage or bolster the US government claim that 
 they are fighting a war 
		against a formidable foe in  
		Afghanistan? Of what significance is it that 
		the coalition  
		covered up this alleged 'fact'? 
		 
		And the data that the Taliban 'massively escalated their 
 roadside 
		bombing campaign, killing more than 2,000  
		civilians'; is this damaging 
		to the US government, or 
		'evidence' that the US is fighting the good 
		fight in  
		Afghanistan? 
		 
		The other English paper that ran with the Afghan 'war logs' 
 was the
		NY 
		Times. Their headline summation told us: 
		 
		Pakistan Spy Service Aids Insurgents, Reports Assert 
		 
		The fate of Combat Outpost Keating illustrates many of  
		the frustrations 
		of the allied effort: low troop levels,  
		unreliable Afghan partners and a 
		growing insurgency. 
		 
		The military and intelligence reports provide a real-time 
 history of the 
		Afghan war from the vantage point of  
		American troops actually doing the 
		fighting and 
 reconstruction. 
		 
		So, thanks to Wiki-leaks, the unlikely darling of the  
		]mainstream media, 
		the world is being informed that the  
		'enemy' in Afghanistan is growing 
		stronger, Pakistan and 
 Iran are to blame, and brave US troops are 
		engaged in  
		'reconstruction' there! 
		 
		But Pakistan and the Taliban are not the main target of  
		disinformation 
		in these documents. As more documents 
 are released, it becomes clear 
		that, sitting square in the 
 bulls-eye, is Iran. The initial round of 
		leaks provided this  
		sensational 'revelation', reported here by the UK 
		Telegraph: 
		 
		
		Wiki-leaks: how Iran devised new suicide vest for  
		
		al-Qaeda to use in 
		Iraq 
		 
		Iranian-backed forces supplied insurgents attacking  
		coalition troops and 
		devised new forms of suicide vests  
		for al-Qaeda, according to 
		assessments released by  
		Wiki-leaks. 
		 
		Only in their wildest dreams could the war-mongers in  
		Washington and Tel 
		Aviv have wished for a more on- 
		message leak of 'secret information'. 
		 
		And so to the latest raft of documents, partially released  
		just a few 
		days ago. When I read their contents, to say that 
 I was shocked would be 
		to grossly over-state my reaction. 
 I could have written them myself: 
		 
		
		Wiki-leaks: Iran 'obtains North Korea missiles which can  
		
		strike Europe' 
		 
		This one, I have to admit, is entirely believable because, a 
		fter all,
		
		everyone knows Saddam had the same capability   
		
		several years ago, 
		remember? In fact, this 'revelation' about 
 Iran's capability to 
		threaten Europe is even more believable 
 than the 'sexed-up' Iraq dossier 
		claim, because this  
		revelation comes from Wiki-leaks, an honest-to-god 
		 
		whistle blower organization, right? I mean, there's just no 
 way that 
		agents working on behalf of the US and Israeli  
		governments could 
		possibly use such an organization to  
		spread propaganda, right? 
		 
		Is there no one in the alternative news community that can  
		see this for 
		what it is? North Korea supplying missiles to  
		Iran to attack Europe?! 
		Right when the US and Israel are  
		involved in a protracted effort to 
		demonize Iran to the  
		world and the US has an aircraft carrier sitting 
		off the  
		Korean Coast!? Is all of this meant to be so obvious, or did  
		my 
		reading of 'psychological operations for dummies' gift  
		me with amazing 
		insight into how political propaganda  
		really works? 
		 
		Does anyone truly believe that the fact that someone in the 
 US State 
		Department thinks that Sarkozy is an 'Emperor 
 with no clothes' will do 
		any real damage? Is this meant to 
 be a secret? It is certainly no secret 
		to over 60% of the  
		French public who, years ago, openly stated as much. 
		 
		Likewise the 'revelation' about Berlusconi; 'feckless, vain 
 and 
		ineffective as a modern European leader'? What about 
 'senile, 
		megalomaniac, psychopath, pedophile' this is what 
 the Italians and most 
		Europeans are saying, does the US  
		State Department not read the papers 
		before compiling  
		'secret dossiers' on foreign leaders? 
		 
		And what of the the North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il?  
		He's a 'flabby 
		old chap' according to these 'damaging  
		reports'. Is this meant to cause 
		some kind of diplomatic rift 
 between North Korea and Washington before 
		or after the  
		USA and its client state of South Korea bombs Kim and a  
		few 
		million North Koreans back to the stone age? And  
		Iranian President 
		Ahmadinejad - 'Hitler'?? Does anyone  
		expect the Obama government to want 
		to retract that one or 
 hide it from the public? More to the point, are 
		we all  
		suffering from collective amnesia? Who has repeatedly 
 referred to 
		Iran and it's democratically-elected leader as 
 Nazi Germany and a new 
		Hitler? Anyone? Ok, here's a hint. 
		 
		Ok, so I mentioned Israel a couple of times. Why? Here's 
 one reason, 
		from the horse's mouth: In Israel the prime  
		minister, Benjamin 
		Netanyahu, said that he felt vindicated 
 by [Wiki-leaks] revelations 
		about the extent of international 
 and Arab concern about Iran and its 
		nuclear programme. 
 "Israel has not been damaged at all by the WikiLeaks 
		 
		publications," Netayahu said. 
		 
		"The documents show many sources backing Israel's  
		assessments, 
		particularly of Iran. Our region has been 
 hostage to a narrative that is 
		the result of 60 years of  
		propaganda, which paints Israel as the 
		greatest threat.  
		In reality leaders understand that that view is 
		bankrupt.  
		For the first time in history there is agreement that Iran  
		is 
		the threat," he said. 
		 
		There is also the fact that it is public knowledge that  
		Israel operates 
		an extensive and very well-entrenched  
		network of spies in 
		the US, including the infamous
		 
		
		Israeli art students. 
		 
		In 2005 the FBI noted, for example, that Israel maintains 
		"an active 
		program to gather proprietary information  
		within the United States." A 
		key Israeli method, said the 
 FBI report, is computer intrusion. 
		 
		And what are we to make of the strange coincidence  
		where, on the very 
		same day that Wiki-leaks releases  
		documents that contain key data about 
		the Iranian  
		nuclear program, the
		
		Israeli Mossad murders one  
		
		Iranian nuclear scientist and injures another 
		in Tehran? 
		 
		In determining the origin of the Wiki-leaks documents,  
		we need ask 
		ourselves but one question: in whose  
		interest is it to put pressure on 
		the US government 
 through the release of documents to the press (via 
 Wiki-leaks) that force the US to do a certain amount of 
 damage control, 
		while simultaneously portraying Iran  
		as the biggest threat to world 
		peace? Because that, in 
 the final analysis, is the overall effect of the 
		Wiki-leaks 
 documents. Wiki-leaks performs so poorly in the 'smell  
		test' 
		that I feel confident in suggesting that the  
		documents may not even be 
		original documents; and if 
 they are, they have very likely been amended 
		in such a  
		way that they serve the Israeli/Zionist agenda. 
		 
		--- 
		 
		Related article: 
		 
		Yossi Melman: Mossad, MI6, the CIA and the case of the  
		assassinated 
		scientist (30 November 2010) 
		
		http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/ 
		
		yossi-melman-mossad-mi6-the-cia-and-the-case-of-the- 
		
		assassinated-scientist-2146995.html 
		 
		Three events - not seemingly related - took place yesterday. 
 The leaking 
		of State Department documents, many of  
		which deal with the world's 
		concerns about Iran's nuclear 
 programme; the mysterious assassination in 
		Tehran of a 
		top Iranian nuclear scientist and the wounding of another, 
 and the appointment of Tamir Pardo as the new head of 
 Mossad, Israel's 
		foreign espionage agency. But there's a 
 link between them. They are part 
		of the endless efforts by 
 the Israeli intelligence community, together 
		with its  
		Western counterparts including Britain's MI6 and America's 
 CIA, 
		to sabotage, delay and if possible, to stop Iran from 
 reaching its goal 
		of having its first nuclear bomb. The 
 attack on the two scientists, one 
		of them mentioned as a  
		top nuclear scientist working with Iran's 
		Ministry of Defence, 
 was part of these efforts. No organisation claimed 
		 
		responsibility but it is obvious, not just because of  
		accusations by 
		Iranian officials and Iran's media, that  
		Israel was behind it. Most 
		experts who follow Middle East  
		politics and Mossad history would agree. 
		It is at least the  
		fourth attempt to assassinate Iranian scientists 
		linked with 
 the country's nuclear programme in four years. There  
		were 
		probably other attempts which did not hit the 
 headlines. The attribution 
		to Mossad is not because of  
		the use of motorcycles, though in the past 
		Mossad has  
		been involved in similar operations. The best known one 
 was 
		in 1995 in Valletta, Malta, when a Mossad hit-team  
		liquidated Dr Fathi 
		Shkaki, the leader of the Islamic Jihad. 
 It has more to do with the 
		policy of Mossad to deal a  
		blow to Iran's nuclear programme. On top of 
		 
		assassinating nuclear scientists to terrorise others and  
		force some to 
		quit, it is believed that Mossad was also 
 behind penetrating Iranian 
		purchasing networks and  
		selling them flawed equipment of its nuclear 
		enrichment  
		centrifuges and most recently by planting a virus which  
		has 
		damaged the nuclear computers at Natanz. Yet  
		despite these daring ploys, 
		it is obvious to Israeli  
		decision-makers as well as to western leaders 
		that if a  
		country is determined enough to develop nuclear  
		weapons 
		nothing would stop it. 
		 
		3. 
		 
		From: 
		http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ 
		
		comidwiki.php 
		 
		THE COMPLETE IDIOT'S GUIDE TO WIKILEAKS  
		LATEST DOCUMENT DUMP 
		 
		Michael Rivero 
		 
		Wikileaks, following much media fanfare (reason for 
 suspicion right 
		there) has just released a huge number 
 of documents supposedly leaked to 
		WikiLeaks and no 
 other websites'. The media is denouncing this as a 
		 
		threat to the United States while US politicians wring t 
		heir hands and 
		wonder when they will be free of the curse 
 of the First Amendment and 
		all that troublesome  
		nonsense about Freedom of Speech. Many observers 
 think this is a propaganda set up and that neither Julian 
 Assange or 
		WikiLaeks should be taken at face value.  
		After all, Julian Assange keeps 
		insisting there was no  
		9-11 conspiracy and the 9-11 truth movement a 
		 
		"distraction." Apparently Julian Assange has patented 
 conspiracy and 
		nobody else may expose one except  
		himself! 
		 
		Of course, there is really not that much that is new in  
		this latest 
		dump. Like prior WikiLeaks dumps, most of 
 it is old news mixed with some 
		rather dubious claims.  
		In his last such dump, Julian Assange included a 
		claim 
 that Osama bin Laden is still alive and controlling Al  
		Qaeda. Of 
		course, it is well documented outside the  
		United States that Osama bin 
		Laden has been dead for  
		many years and that Al Qaeda itself is a fake 
		front group  
		created to hoax Americans into endless wars of conquest, 
 much as the fictional Emmanuel Goldstein was used in  
		George Orwell's 
		"1984." 
		 
		In yet another infamous propaganda attempt, WikiLeaks 
 tried to claim 
		that weapons of mass destruction had  
		been found in Iraq, justifying the 
		invasion. No such 
 weapons were ever found. 
		 
		As for the present batch of documents, again it is a  
		rehash of stories 
		already known to the blog-o-sphere.  
		Even those people who did not know 
		US diplomats spy  
		on their United Nations counterparts did not find it 
		 
		surprising or in any way a new idea. 
		 
		So what is the real purpose of Assange's little charade? 
 Propaganda. 
		 
		Propaganda is like rat poison. 95% of it is tasty, healthy  
		food. But the 
		purpose is to get you to swallow the  
		poison. The same is true of the 
		WikiLeaks document  
		dump. The bait are all these old stories which we 
 already knew about, used to convince us that the entire 
 pile is "tasty, 
		healthy food," except that it isn't. Buried  
		in the pile of delicious, 
		albeit past the expiration date 
 morsels are the bits of poison which the 
		US  
		Government knows you will no longer accept at face 
 value from the 
		controlled media, but hope you will eat  
		if handed to you by a con artist 
		posing as hostile to the 
 government. 
		 
		So, given that 95% of the current WikiLeaks is really old  
		news, as a 
		public service I will point out the bits of  
		poison that Julian hopes you 
		will eat. 
		 
		1. Iran is bad so you should all want to kill them. 
		 
		2. Saudi Arabia is bad because they are funding Al Qaeda  
		so you should 
		all want to kill them. 
		 
		3. North Korea is bad because they gave really long range 
 missiles to 
		Iran for Iran to put their nuclear warheads in, 
 so you should all want 
		to kill them. 
		 
		4. China is messing with your computers, so you should 
 all want to kill 
		them. 
		 
		That about sums it up. Oh yes, there is nothing negative  
		about Israel in 
		all these diplomatic messages, an  
		impossibility given the lethal Israeli 
		attack on the Aid  
		Flotilla last May. That suggests who Assange really 
		works 
 for. 
		 
		If WikiLeaks were really bad, why doesn't DHS, which did  
		not hesitate to 
		takeover dozens of domains this last week 
 for copyright infringement, 
		not take over WikiLeaks  
		domain for "National Security?" Clearly, the US 
		 
		Government wants you to read the "leaks!" 
		 
		--- 
		 
		Related articles: 
		 
		Wikileaks and The Tel Aviv Connection (Nov-29-2010) 
		
		http://www.salem-news.com/ 
		
		articles/november292010/israel-connection-jg.php 
		 
		(TEMPE, Az.) - What is Tel Aviv to do now that it’s known 
 Israelis and 
		pro-Israelis ‘fixed’ the intelligence that 
 induced the U.S. to war in 
		Iraq? Fool me once, shame  
		on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Con me 
		 
		consistently for six decades and the relationship is over, 
 as is 
		Israel’s credibility as a legitimate nation state.Tel 
 Aviv knows this. 
		But what can the Zionist state do about 
 it? Answer: Wikileaks.Why now? 
		Misdirection. Shine the 
 spotlight on Washington to take it off Tel Aviv. 
		That’s  
		good old-fashioned psy-ops. And challenge the  
		credibility of the 
		U.S. That’s Wikileaks. Any credible  
		forensics would start by asking: to 
		whose benefit? Then 
 look to means, motive and opportunity plus the 
		presence of stable nation-state intelligence inside the  
		U.S.Tepid 
		Support will not Suffice - Obama has behaved  
		as anticipated by those who 
		produced his presidency. 
 Anyone surprised at the lack of change in U.S. 
		policy in  
		the Middle East fails to grasp the power of the Israel 
		 
		lobby.Did he hesitate to support their latest Israeli  
		strategy for 
		scuttling peace negotiations? Absent peace, 
 the U.S. will continue to be 
		the target of those outraged  
		at America’s unflinching support for 
		Israel’s thuggish  
		behavior in pursuit of its expansionist goals. 
		Confirming  
		the lobby’s influence, Netanyahu announced he would  
		not agree 
		to halt settlements on Palestinian land until  
		Obama reduced to writing a 
		$3 billion bribe. In return for 
 a proposed 90-day freeze, what form of 
		bribe will  
		America provide? Twenty F-35 jets at $150 million each 
 plus 
		parts, maintenance, training and armaments. (...)  
		Wikileaks’ release of 
		confidential diplomatic cables  
		provides Israel an opportunity to 
		undermine U.S. relations  
		worldwide while also inflicting lasting damage 
		on U.S.  
		interests in the Middle East. After this, what nation would 
		 
		trust the U.S. to maintain a confidence? In October,  
		Turkey asked that 
		the U.S. not share intelligence with  
		Israel. Now who dares share 
		intelligence with the U.S.?  
		This may signal the beginning of the end for 
		the Obama 
 presidency his domestic policy failures are eclipsed by 
 his 
		failures in foreign policy.This may also signal  
		pre-staging for the 2012 
		presidential primary with a  
		weakened Obama forced to name Clinton as his 
		running  
		mate or stepping aside so she can lead the ballot.Her  
		2008 
		presidential campaign promised recognition of  
		Israel as a “Jewish state” 
		and promised an “undivided  
		Jerusalem as the capital.” Tel Aviv was 
		elated. A second  
		Clinton presidency would ensure another victory for 
		 
		Israel—and no peace. 
		 
		Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison (October 28, 2010) 
		
		http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=15318 
		 
		Disinformation is defined as ‘misinformation that is 
 deliberately 
		disseminated in order to influence or 
 confuse rivals.’ It is used by 
		governments to mislead 
 and brainwash their citizen populations, 
		instigate wars, 
 and blackmail foreign regimes. It is the ultimate 
		 
		instrument of the media. The most effective  
		disinformation is that which 
		is comprised of falsehood  
		as well as facts. Wikileaks, founded by Julian 
		Assange, 
 fits this description perfectly, right down to the letter. 
 Seemingly overnight, it has become one of the biggest 
 ‘whistle-blowing’ 
		agencies in modern history. In reality  
		though, it is one of the biggest 
		disinformation projects 
 in modern history, and it may be the most 
		dangerous  
		because it is masquerading as an organization of truth. 
 The 
		information released by Wikileaks isn’t new; it isn’t 
 groundbreaking; it 
		doesn’t hurt the US as much as 
 people think, it’s fractional really; and 
		it is overloaded 
 with as much as propaganda as the day-to-day Zionist 
		 
		media is. This propaganda is benefitting someone. And 
 that someone is 
		the illegal usurping entity of Israel. Even 
 the Israeli government 
		itself thinks so (1). CLIP 
		 
		 
		GORDON DUFF: WIKILEAKS, A TOUCH OF ASSANGE  
		AND THE STENCH OF AIPAC 
		(November 27, 2010) 
		
		http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/11/27/gordon-duff- 
		
		wikileak-predictions-sticking-my-neck-out-2/ 
		 
		Wikileaks is like a TV show that never gets off the ground. 
 We started 
		with a “shoot ‘em up” in Iraq, the helicopter  
		slaughter soon forgotten 
		and move on to, well, what? We 
 got a deluge of material from 
		Afghanistan, carefully  
		gleaned to point fingers at Pakistan. When it 
		came down 
 to backing any of it up, it went nowhere.Considering the 
 massive corruption and drug scandals, even the  
		revelations that 
		President Karzai has been in negotiations 
 with pranksters pretending to 
		be the Taliban, all the really 
 juicy stuff from Afghanistan must have 
		been in another  
		drawer. Then we got Iraq. Ah, Iraq. There, we could 
		check. 
 We know the people who wrote the leaked material. They 
 told us 
		Wikileaks edited it, altered it, redacted it more than 
 the Pentagon. The 
		“Iraq War Log” was, well…phony.  
		There is one thing that has been 
		consistent about  
		Wikileaks and our prediction is that this next batch, 
		 
		reputed to be millions of highly sensitive documents, will 
 prove our 
		point. Wikileaks is Israel. Wikileaks is an  
		intelligence operation to 
		weaken and undermine the  
		American government, orchestrated from Tel 
		Aviv, using 
 dozens of operatives, dual citizens, some at the highest 
 authority levels, spies for Israel. Through leaking 
 carefully selected 
		intelligence along with proven falsified  
		documents, all fed to a 
		controlled press, fully complicit, 
 Wikileaks is, in fact, an act of war 
		against the United  
		States. -  
		CHECK ALSO
		
		GORDON DUFF:  
		
		“AIPAC ORDERED BUSH TO ATTACK IRAN” 
		 
		HOW CAN ISRAEL SIFT THROUGH DEFENSE  
		DOCUMENTS? 
		This last week, in a lawsuit over an AIPAC, (Israel’s  
		lobby) employee 
		reputedly fired for being caught spying 
 against the US, news stories 
		across the United States  
		reported that, as part of that $20 million 
		civil case,  
		evidence will be presented that masses of classified 
		 
		material come to AIPAC and Israel continually. Is AIPAC 
 Wikileaks? The 
		only evidence of any massive leak  
		discovered in the Pentagon is AIPAC. 
		 
		(...) WHAT WILL BE IN WIKILEAKS? 
		If dual citizens who make up much of the Pentagon’s  
		leadership are 
		working with Israel or AIPAC to formulate 
 Wikileaks, as seems to be the 
		case, then the upcoming  
		leak will serve a pro-Israeli agenda, even if it 
		damages the 
 United States, as other Wikileaks have. These are Israeli 
		 
		agenda items:Discrediting Obama foreign policy in order  
		to weaken the 
		president’s influence with congress to push 
 for a halt on new 
		settlements in Palestine and the forced 
 removal of Islamic property 
		owners. Accusations  
		involving Turkey, now feuding with Israel over the 
		killing 
 of Turkish citizens on the Mavi Marmara, now recognized  
		as a 
		purely humanitarian mission. These accusations  
		against Turkey may 
		include weapons being supplied to  
		terrorists in Iraq, a fanciful abuse 
		of reality. What will not  
		be reported, if this story is “leaked” either 
		through  
		Wikileaks or the other Israeli sources, 
		“Debka”..”Stratfor” 
		..”FamilySecurityMatters.org”..or the infamous 
		 
		“IsraelNationalNews.com” is Israel’s 40 years of  
		complicity in the very 
		acts they now accuse Turkey of. 
		More importantly, is the issue of blaming 
		Turkey for the 
 actions of the terrorist group, PKK, long funded by 
		 
		Israel and now claimed to be allied to Al Qaeda, is vital  
		to Israel’s 
		strategy against Turkey.Expect Pakistan to be 
 hit, as usual. An Islamic 
		nuclear power with a top rate  
		million man army that outclasses Israel 
		hands down,  
		Pakistan, primary competitor for US aid dollars, a  
		country 
		that actually has agreements with the United  
		States and real troops 
		fighting alongside Americans,  
		will get their usual Wikileaks bashing. 
		 
		WIKILEAKS IS CHICKENFEED MEANT  
		TO COVER ISRAEL’S TAIL 
		 
		Is it a coincidence that documents regarding Israel, 
 their spying, 
		influence peddling, suspicions of  
		complicity in terrorism, Yemen, Iraq, 
		Pakistan,  
		Somalia, across Europe and even the Detroit bombing,  
		those 
		reports are there, they are classified but you will  
		never see one on 
		Wikileaks. In fact, they are the only 
 classified information that never 
		gets out to the news.  
		Is that because, as we have learned, the borders 
		of 
 Israel extend well into Washington DC, well into the 
 Pentagon? What 
		won’t we see in Wikileaks:Nothing in 
 Wikileaks will accuse anyone, even 
		Pakistan or 
 Afghanistan, or complicity in narcotics trafficking nor 
 mention the huge new narcotics industry operating in 
 Iraq. Ask yourself 
		why.One of the biggest areas of  
		complaint in the Pentagon, more 
		classified White 
 Papers have been written on this than anything else: 
		 
		“How Israel is Endangering the United States“In fact, 
 the biggest 
		“classified” debate in America is what  
		supporting Israel, a nation with 
		incredible wealth and 
 utterly obnoxious leaders costs the United States. 
		 
		Rumors of such issues aren’t rumors at all. When  
		General Petraeus 
		presented his now famous power 
		-point presentation to Admiral Mullen, 
		Chairman of 
 the Joint Chiefs of Staff, outlining how Israel is 
		 
		undermining American foreign policy, he wasn’ 
		t operating without tens of 
		thousands of pages of 
 intelligence behind him. Not one page, not one 
		 
		word of these studies will be in Wikileaks. CLIP
  
		 
		4. 
		 
		 
		From:
		
		http://beforeitsnews.com/story/294/056/Is_ 
		
		the_Internet_9_11_Under_Way.html 
		 
		Is the Internet 9/11 Under Way? 
		 
		By Zen Gardner - 4 December 2010 
		 
		Think about it. Where is this seemingly staged  
		Wikileaks furor taking 
		us? While we participate in 
 digging into the juicy tidbits of 
		information that  
		incriminate just about anybody and everybody,  
		where is 
		it all going? 
		Lessons of 9/11 
		 
		While 9/11 served as a wake up call to those awake and  
		aware enough to 
		see the obvious demolitions and  
		misinformation and resultant "Pearl 
		Harbor" effect,  
		most of the world fell for it. And now people are 
		literally 
 bending over, as in airport 'screenings', to the  
		onslaught of 
		police state fascism worldwide. It's  
		staggering. In fact, it's 
		Orwellian. The armies, police  
		and private sector are at war with the 
		vague concept of 
 terrorism - an unbeatable enemy in a war that can be 
		 
		drawn out indefinitely and fought in any arena  
		necessary. 
		 
		And what was the result of this declared war on  
		terrorism? Not a war on 
		terror, but an increase in fear  
		and terror, all to justify the economic, 
		social and  
		political clampdown that has followed. 
		 
		What will the Wikileaks debacle herald? 
		 
		You guessed it--the last bastion of freedom of  
		information and 
		expression, a free Internet, will topple. 
 After all, if information is 
		now the enemy, we must  
		carefully police any and every aspect of this 
		dangerous  
		medium--all for the safety and protection of 'we the 
 people'. 
		 
		Oh, we'll still have the Internet, just like you can still fly. 
		 
		You'll 
		just have to be on the "approved" list, screened,  
		stamped, zapped, 
		mugged and molested if you want to 
 get "on the net". No biggie. Thanks 
		Julian--job well  
		done. 
		 
		Warning Signs 
		 
		#1. Wikileaks---WAY too approved and publicized.  
		Every TV and cable 
		network, press worldwide, official 
 recognition from every level of 
		government. Heck, he  
		even does a TED talk! Where's anyone else trying to 
		 
		expose the agenda? Only Julian. Hmmm. 
		 
		#2. Biggie: This supposed system fighter says the 9/11  
		truth issue is "a 
		distraction". Mustn't step on your  
		bosses' toes now, should we Julian.. 
		Very suspicious 
 if you ask me. 
		 
		#3. Wikileaks and Assange's sketchy background: 
		 
		The WikiLeaks website first appeared on the Internet in 
 December 
		2006.[15][16] The site claims to have been  
		"founded by Chinese 
		dissidents, journalists, 
 mathematicians and start-up company 
		technologists,  
		from the US, Taiwan, Europe, Australia and South 
		 
		Africa".[5] The creators of WikiLeaks have not been  
		formally 
		identified.[17] It has been represented in  
		public since January 2007 by 
		Julian Assange and  
		others. Assange describes himself as a member of 
		 
		WikiLeaks' advisory board.[18] (Wikipedia) 
		 
		Also, Assange reportedly wrote for both the New York  
		Times and the 
		Economist which is fishy as well--not a 
 real enlightened or 
		'alternative' mindset. His  
		mysterious persona also plays well to the 
		Wikileaks 
 furtive image so people won't expect to know too  
		much, which 
		also is very 'convenient' for keeping  
		anything hidden. 
		[NOTE: There doesn't have to be deliberate,  
		conscious involvement in 
		some agenda on Wikileaks'  
		part, but it helps. He, they, could be 'useful 
		idiots'  
		whose program has been conveniently co-opted by  
		the controllers 
		to serve their purpose. Either way,  
		look for the pattern and the 
		effects.] 
		 
		#4. Watch the hype: There's a growing crescendo of  
		anger and hate that 
		is now being whipped up--to the 
 point that Assange is being called a new 
		kind of 
 terrorist--and more disturbingly, and as expected, the 
 comparison is now being drawn between Assange and  
		Bin Laden: 
		 
		Social Media Leaks Categorize Julian Assange As the  
		Osama Bin Laden Of 
		The Internet 
		 
		The founder of WikiLeaks is not only a wanted man by  
		the American 
		authorities, his now infamous Web site 
		 
		WikiLeaks is also under attack by notorious hackers, 
 while its services 
		are being cut-off by Amazon and  
		EveryDNS.net. Although not officially 
		announced,  
		Julian Assange might be considered today's public  
		enemy 
		number-one, taking the place of the illusive  
		Osama bin Laden. Not since 
		9/11 has any one figure  
		reached such notoriety due to what many consider 
		 
		acts against a state. 
		 
		Like bin Laden, Assange has no permanent address,  
		does not maintain a 
		headquarters, employs only a  
		select few confidants and has taken to 
		hiding in covert 
 areas. Younger than bin Laden, Assange at 39 years- 
		old 
		may be a little more mobile than the 53 year-old,  
		choosing to hopscotch 
		the globe versus hibernating 
 in the mountains of Pakistan and 
		Afghanistan. 
		 
		While his face resides on the covers of magazines and 
 newspapers around 
		the world, similar to a Wild West 
 'Wanted' poster, little is known about 
		his day-to-day  
		activities. Like bin Laden's video addresses, while the 
 CIA and other mercenaries are seeking his  
		where-a-bouts, it's amazing 
		that he still finds ways to 
 release updates justifying his actions. 
		(SOURCE) 
		 
		Notice also how we've been hearing about Wikileaks'  
		exploits for a few 
		years now, giving us time to make  
		the connection between it and 
		sensational and 
 'destructive informational terrorism'. Similarly we 
		 
		heard about Osama through the Yemen and Nairobi  
		attacks being attibuted 
		to him, imprinting his "brand" 
 on the collective mind which led to the 
		foregone  
		phony conclusion that he had masterminded the 9/11  
		attacks. 
		Ah, 'But what about these apparent exposures? Would  
		they attack their 
		own?' 
		Could all these serious indictments against their own 
 just be a 
		deflecting smokescreen to hide the real  
		purpose? Sure worked last time. 
		So why wouldn't  
		they risk taking down some of their own to give this 
 psychological operation credibility? 
		 
		Pentagon strikes 'its own' on 9/11---need I say more? 
		 
		The Tactic Is Very Familiar - Know Your Enemy 
		 
		First there's the Hegelian Dialectic - create a problem, 
 provoke a 
		reaction and then implement the pre- 
		planned solution. The staged 9/11 
		attacks, including  
		the internationally inhabited World Trade Center, 
		 
		'justified' the ensuing wars and worldwide clampdown 
 on freedoms in the 
		name of 'security', including the 
 horrendous Patriot Act that was 
		already written and  
		just waiting for an excuse to be signed and 
		 
		implemented. 
		 
		Similarly, this attack over the international Internet  
		and drawing in 
		diplomatic communities worldwide  
		by exposing state secrets from a 
		variety of countries 
 will greatly help usher in international measures 
		in  
		the name of 'security', probably spearheaded once  
		again by the 
		fascist US government with coinciding 
 EU, Canadian & Australian 
		measures. It's already  
		under way with the Department of Homeland 
		Security 
 confiscating websites. 
		 
		All they need is 'the right incident" to justify bringing 
 on full 
		control. Like "Internet Terrorism"? They just  
		can't use that term enough 
		now, can they. After all, it's  
		a war on terror, and "if you're not for 
		us, you're for the 
 terrorists." The ultimate false choice, just like 
		 
		everything else they foist on the human consciousness. 
		Pretty clever these ol' boys. It's in their blood. 
		 
		Those manipulating world events belong to a cult, a  
		brotherhood that 
		hides behind many names and guises,  
		and to which they pledge their 
		absolute loyalty above 
 everything, even their own flesh and blood. 
		Commonly 
 referred to as the Illuminati, this cult has an agenda  
		they 
		work to fulfill using certain rituals, methods and 
 tactics. 
		 
		One of their central themes and modus operandums is 
 "Ordo Ab Chao"-- 
		order out of chaos. Create the chaos, 
 pitting anyone against anyone 
		while controlling and 
 fomenting both sides--hence the double headed red 
		 
		phoenix symbol-- for any reason, even killing or  
		exposing their own, to 
		create an illogical madness  
		that they think only they can see through 
		and  
		understand. All the while they are manipulating  
		world governments, 
		banks, armies and corporate  
		leaders and drawing the net on the outcome 
		they  
		have already planned. 
		 
		Fear and confusion is the climate they love to  
		foment. As long as 
		there's a confused and 
 uninformed populace, the ignorant and fearful 
 masses will be crying out for help from the 
 'powers that be' - the very 
		"powers that be" that 
 caused all the problems in the first place. 
		 
		They're not out to help, they're out to control. At 
 any cost, by any 
		means necessary. 
		 
		 
		5. 
		 
		From:
		
		http://mycatbirdseat.com/2010/12/ 
		
		the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran/ 
		 
		Is Wikileaks being manipulated by an intelligence  
		service? 
		 
		By Alan Hart 
		 
		The Wikileaks revelation that some Persian Gulf Arab  
		leaders wanted (and 
		still want?) America to attack Iran 
 is confirmation of what some of us 
		thought we knew – 
 that Arab leaders are not merely impotent but as 
 dangerously deluded as their Israeli counterparts. 
		 
		Netanyahu was absolutely correct when he told a 
 group of editors in Tel 
		Aviv that “Israel has not been 
 damaged at all by the Wikileaks 
		publications.” A  
		senior Israeli government official went further in his 
 response to questions from AFP. He said: “We have 
 come out looking 
		good.” The leaked documents, he  
		added, “confirm that the whole Middle 
		East is terrified 
 by the prospect of a nuclear Iran… The Arab countries 
 are pushing the United States towards military action 
 more forcefully 
		than Israel.” 
		 
		Actually the assertion that “the whole Middle East is 
 terrified by the 
		prospect of a nuclear Iran” is nonsense. 
 The Arab regimes which more or 
		less do the bidding  
		of America-and-Zionism are terrified, but the same 
 cannot be said of many of their repressed subjects.  
		As Noam Chomsky 
		pointed out in a recent interview 
 with Open Democracy’s Amy Goodman, a 
		poll of Arab 
 opinion indicates that 80% regard Israel as the major 
		 
		threat in the region. Iran is seen as a threat by only 10%. 
 The poll 
		also indicated that 57% believe the region  
		would be a more safe place if 
		Iran had nuclear weapons. 
 (As with Israel/Palestine, the regimes are 
		effectively on 
 one side – that of America-and-Israel, and the Arab 
		 
		masses are on the other side – that of the Palestinians). 
		 
		The only good news confirmed by the latest Wiki leaked 
 documents is that 
		President Obama has so far resisted 
 pressure from both Israel and the 
		Arabs. (In fairness it  
		should not be forgotten that President George 
		“Dubya” 
 Bush also said “No” to an attack on Iran when Vice  
		President 
		Cheney wanted him to authorize it). 
		 
		There is no mystery about why any U.S. president who is 
 not completely 
		nuts will refuse to authorize an American 
 attack on Iran (and do his 
		best to stop Israel going it alone, 
 no doubt with clearance through 
		Saudi airspace). An  
		American attack on Iran would have huge and possibly 
 incalculable consequences for American interests. It  
		would set in motion 
		an escalating and possibly unending  
		counter offensive including 
		unbridled terrorism against  
		American forces and facilities (civilian and 
		business as 
 well as military) around the world. And while that was 
		 
		happening, what is left of the global economy could be  
		wrecked by 
		sustained rises in the price of oil. 
		 
		If those Arab leaders who pressed America to attack Iran 
 discount the 
		catastrophe scenario indicated above, they 
 are very, very irresponsible. 
		But there is more to their  
		folly. 
		 
		I don’t believe Iran’s ruling mullahs want nuclear  
		weapons, but under 
		pressure from the Revolutionary 
 Guards (the real power in the country 
		when push comes 
 to shove?), they may have agreed in principle a while 
		 
		ago that Iran should have at least the possibility of  
		developing a 
		nuclear bomb for deterrence. 
		 
		Prior to the publication of Wiki’s latest leaks, the question 
 of how far 
		and how fast Iran should go to have the  
		possibility of developing a 
		nuclear bomb was still the 
 subject of debate in the leadership in all of 
		its  
		manifestations. It may be that Wiki’s revelations will play 
 into the 
		hands of those in Tehran who are insisting that 
 Iran must have a nuclear 
		bomb for deterrence. 
		 
		While I was absorbing what the Wiki leaks confirmed  
		about the attitudes 
		of Arab leaders, I asked myself this 
 question: What would I want if I 
		was an Iranian, even 
 one who hated the present regime? 
		 
		My answer? 
		 
		I would want my government, whatever its composition, 
 to crash ahead 
		with developing a nuclear bomb for  
		deterrence. I would tell myself that 
		was the only way to  
		keep Iran safe from Arab-backed Israeli threats. And 
		 
		when challenged in argument, I would say, “Do you think 
 America and 
		Britain would have invaded Iraq if Saddam  
		Hussein had nuclear weapons?” 
		 
		My main point? 
		 
		If Iran does become a nuclear-armed state, it will be  
		because of Israeli 
		threats and Arab leadership’s  
		endorsement of them. 
		 
		Now to a most controversial question, one at least as  
		controversial as 
		the various 9/11 conspiracy theories. 
		 
		Is Wikileaks being manipulated by intelligence services 
 – one or 
		several? 
		 
		There are a number of bloggers – some of them informed 
 writers with 
		credibility, some of them uninformed, anti- 
		Semitic conspiracy theory 
		nutters – who think the answer 
 is “Yes”. More to the point is that no 
		less a figure than 
 Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter’s National 
		 
		Security Advisor, thinks the answer could be “Yes”. He 
 said so in an 
		interview with PBS’s Judy Woodruff and  
		also in a subsequent BBC World 
		Service (Radio)  
		interview. 
		 
		To Judy Woodruff he said: 
		 
		“The real issue is, who is feeding Wikileaks? They’re 
 getting a lot of 
		information which seems trivial,  
		inconsequential, but some of it seems 
		surprisingly  
		pointed… The very pointed references to Arab leaders  
		could 
		have as their objective undermining their 
 political credibility at home, 
		because this kind of  
		public identification of their hostility towards 
		Iran  
		could actually play against them at home…It’s a 
 question of whether 
		Wikileaks are being manipulated 
 by interested parties that want to 
		either complicate 
 our relationship with other governments or want to 
 undermine some governments… I have no doubt that  
		Wikileaks is getting a 
		lot of the stuff from sort of 
 relatively unimportant sources, like the 
		one that  
		perhaps is identified on the air. But it may be getting 
 stuff 
		at the same time from interested intelligence  
		parties who want to 
		manipulate the process and  
		achieve certain very specific objectives.” 
		 
		Another way to look at the matter is to ask this  
		question. If a visitor 
		from Outer Space studied the  
		first two days of Wikileak’s revelations, 
		what  
		preliminary conclusion would he (or she) come to? 
		 
		I think it’s entirely possible that he (or she) would  
		say: “The main 
		message is clear. Iran is the biggest 
 single threat to the peace of the 
		region and the world 
 and not only because the Israelis say so. Arab 
		 
		leaders agree with them. The secondary message is  
		that apart from the 
		Arab leaders who say they share  
		Israel’s assessment, other Muslim 
		leaders, those in  
		Turkey and Pakistan especially, are not to be 
		trusted.” 
		 
		And here’s another question. Which party benefited  
		most from the first 
		two days of Wikileaks revelations? 
 The obvious answer is the Zionist 
		state of Israel. 
		 
		I must also confess that I have a nagging worry (small 
 but real) about 
		the possibility that Julian Paul Assange,  
		Wikileaks’ founder, has been 
		compromised in some  
		way and is open to manipulation. My concern on this 
 account is the fact that he is a 9/11 conspiracy denier. 
 He is firmly on 
		the record as saying: “I’m constantly 
 annoyed that people are distracted 
		by false  
		conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we  
		provide evidence 
		of real conspiracies, for war or mass 
 financial fraud.” 
		 
		As I have said on public platforms in America and  
		written in a number of 
		articles for the worldwide web,  
		I think there is irrefutable evidence 
		that the Twin  
		Towers were not brought down by the planes and  
		their 
		burning fuel. 
		 
		My own conclusion at the present time is that I don’t 
 have a conclusion; 
		but I think the question of  
		whether or not Wikileaks is being 
		manipulated, and  
		if so by whom, is worthy of deep and serious 
 investigation. 
		 
		--- 
		 
		Alan Hart is a former ITN and BBC Panorama  
		foreign correspondent who 
		covered wars and  
		conflicts wherever they were taking place in the  
		world 
		and specialized in the Middle East. His  
		Latest book
		
		Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews,  
		is a three-volume epic in its 
		American edition. He 
 blogs on  
		
		http://www.alanhart.net and tweets on 
 http://www.twitter.com/alanauthor. 
		 
		 
		From:
		
		http://www.t-room.us/2010/12/posted- 
		 
		
		wpermission-wayne-madsen-reports-december- 
		 
		
		2-2010-u-s-intelligence-retaliates-against-israels- 
		
		role-in-wikileakss-disclosures/ 
		 
		U.S. intelligence retaliates against Israel's role in 
 Wikileaks's 
		disclosures 
		 
		Dec 2, 2010 
		 
		With Israeli officials, including Prime Minister  
		Binyamin Netanyahu, 
		continuing their gloating over 
 the disclosure by Wikileaks of classified 
		U.S. State  
		Department cables, the U.S. intelligence community 
 is taking 
		off its gloves and is releasing some  
		embarrassing information about 
		Netanyahu and a 
 Mossad attempt to use a divorce involving the  
		President 
		of Yemen's family to penetrate the  
		president's family's inner circle in 
		a possible  
		blackmail attempt. 
		 
		Wikileaks's founder, Julian Assange, singled out  
		Netanyahu for praise as 
		a world leader who believes 
 the embarrassing leaks will aid "global 
		diplomacy. 
		" In an interview with Time magazine, Assange said 
 "Netanyahu 
		believes that the result of this 
 publication, which makes the sentiments 
		of many  
		privately held beliefs public, are promising a pretty  
		good . . . 
		. [and] will lead to some kind of increase in  
		the peace process in the 
		Middle East and particularly 
 in relation to Iran." Assange, who is 
		believed to be in 
 the United Kingdom, is the subject of an INTERPOL 
		 
		arrest warrant for alleged "sex crimes" in Sweden. 
		 
		Huseyin Celik, the deputy chief of Turkey's governing 
 Justice and 
		Development Party (AKP), said that Israel 
 appeared to have had advance 
		knowledge of the  
		contents of the latest release of State Department 
		 
		cables. Celik said of the leaks: "One should look at  
		which country is 
		content. Israel is extremely content." 
		 
		Turkish Interior Minister Besir Atalay stated from  
		Ankara that "It seems 
		to us that the country which is 
 not mentioned much, especially in the 
		Middle East, or 
 which this development seems to favor, is Israel. This 
 is how we see it in a way when we look in the context 
 of who is 
		benefiting and who is being harmed." 
		 
		WMR previously reported that Wikileaks, or "WikIsrael",  
		was part of a 
		Mossad operation having links within the 
 neocon and Israel Lobby 
		apparatus of the United States  
		government. Turkey has reasons to be 
		suspicious of the 
 leaks. Various leaked State Department cables 
		suggested 
 that Iran was helping Hamas and secretly helping Iran  
		with its 
		nuclear program. 
		 
		The notorious pro-Israeli publisher of The New Republic,  
		Martin Peretz, 
		chimed in with a column in his magazine  
		stating that the leaks from the 
		U.S. embassy in Ankara  
		proved that Obama's outreach to the Turkish 
		government 
 of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was a "failure." 
		 
		In fact, many of the leaked cables favoring Israel, hostile  
		to Russia 
		and China, or proving very embarrassing to  
		President Obama appear to 
		have been written in total or  
		in part or contain quotes by political 
		appointee or career  
		Jewish diplomats with close ties to Israel and its 
		lobby in 
 the United States: U.S. ambassadors to Turkey Eric  
		Edelman and 
		James Jeffrey; Deputy Secretary of State  
		James B. Steinberg; U.S. 
		ambassador to Brazil Clifford 
 Sobel; U.S. charge d'affaires in Saudi 
		Arabia Michael 
 Gfoeller; Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian 
 Affairs Philip H. Gordon; ambassador-at-large Daniel  
		Fried; U.S. 
		ambassador to Canada David Jacobson;  
		among others. 
		 
		A source within the U.S. Secret Service, on deep  
		background and on the 
		condition of anonymity, informed  
		WMR that while on a "business trip" to 
		New York on  
		November 8, Netanyahu visited a performing arts theater 
 in 
		West Greenwich Village. U.S. Secret Service personnel  
		were required to 
		accompany Netanyahu to the theater.  
		 
		The performance involved extreme 
		sado-masochistic, as 
 well as homosexual themes, according to our source, 
		 
		who added, "I almost threw up." Netanyahu was passing 
 through New York 
		on his way to New Orleans where he  
		addressed the general assembly of the 
		Jewish Federation 
 of North America. 
		 
		Another U.S. intelligence source has revealed to WMR that  
		a well-known 
		operative for the American-Israel Public  
		Affairs Committee (AIPAC) on 
		Capitol Hill is attempting to 
 blackmail the daughter of Yemeni President 
		Ali Abdullah  
		Saleh in a "honey trap" operation. Saleh's daughter, who 
		 
		is 
		recently divorced, has reportedly been writing checks  
		to the AIPAC 
		operative, which, subsequently, are not  
		cashed. The un-cashed checks 
		appear to be part of a  
		Mossad operation designed to establish a paper 
		trail that  
		can later be used to blackmail Saleh through his daughter. 
		 
		These are likely the first of many retaliatory moves by  
		intelligence 
		agencies around the world against Israel. As 
 one informed source put it, 
		"Israel overplayed its hand 
 with these Wikileaks releases, now it will 
		suffer the ' 
		blowback.'" 
		 
		--- 
		 
		MADSEN'S personal observation a few days ago: 
		 
		This from an Italian journalist who has ane excellent  
		point about 
		Wikileaks (of course, no Italian paper got 
 the same scoops as the NYT, 
		[Gate] Guardian,  
		LeMonde, or Spiegel): 
		 
		"Another interesting issue to remark is the (non)role of  
		the Italian 
		journalists in the whole story. It is, at least,  
		odd that a 
		remote-located website news service, with no 
 apparent connection with 
		the country, is able to get  
		sensitive information about the Italian 
		government,  
		while the local journalists - and especially those who  
		write 
		about politics - don't." 
		 
		
		
  
		 
		7. 
		 
		The following comment posted at
		 
		
		http://mycatbirdseat.com/ 
		
		2010/12/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach- 
		
		to-iran/ 
		is in response to
		
		Is Wikileaks a front for the 
		
		 CIA or Mossad?  
		 
		BY RICHARD SPENCER IN 
		THE TELEGRAPH 
		 
		IS WIKILEAKS A FRONT FOR THE CIA OR MOSSAD? A  
		JOURNALIST ASKS AND 
		IMMEDIATELY DISMISSES A  
		FAIR QUESTION WITH NO GOOD REASON 
		 
		“All bizarre and nonsensical conspiracy theory of course.” 
		 
		It is not at all clear why you should say that. The “of  
		course” only 
		emphasizes the lack of analytical basis  
		for your total dismissal. 
		 
		Especially when one considers that in the end you  
		yourself suggest a 
		theme to the material. 
		 
		“Ultimately, they put the onus on Middle Eastern 
 countries to explain 
		themselves. The cables are  
		America’s own explanations. Neither Iran nor 
		many 
 of its Arab friends and  
		 
		 
		enemies like being held to account 
		overmuch.” 
		 
		In our own lifetimes, we have learned of many dark  
		operations more 
		impressive than the selected 
 release of some not-all-that-secret 
		documents,  
		many of them having release dates of not too many 
 years in 
		the future. The term “conspiracy theory” is 
 now consistently used to 
		disparage those who are  
		genuinely puzzled about the official 
		explanations of  
		certain big events. 
		 
		Yes, we have the paranoid extreme, but that extends  
		into the mainstream 
		too, even into politics. 
		 
		In the end you must judge major news events by the  
		standards of the late 
		I.F. Stone. You must read different 
 versions and explanations and make 
		comparisons and 
 weightings. You must judge the purport of the material 
 itself, what it is intended to say or not say. 
		 
		We live in a shadow world as never before in human 
 history with vast 
		intelligence establishments working  
		day and night and a press now 
		reduced to a small  
		number of owners who have their own reasons for 
		 
		giving slants to affairs or even completely 
 misrepresenting them. 
		 
		Truth is perceived infrequently, but there are immensely 
 well-financed 
		establishments busy “getting out the story” 
 and even creating it in some 
		cases. To say otherwise is  
		to admit to extreme naiveté or perhaps 
		dishonesty. 
		 
		When was the last time a paper like your Telegraph or  
		even the New York 
		Times did some serious investigative 
 journalism for readers? Especially 
		where the earth- 
		 
		s milk 
		stuff like the abuse of parliamentary expenses.  
		Almost never. 
		 
		Where were you with Blair’s countless lies? Bush’s lies 
 and absurdities? 
		We lived through a set of events in  
		which, after the greatest peace 
		march in history, Blair 
 managed to twist the truth and lie his way into 
		doing  
		something against the overwhelming sense of the  
		British people. 
		And the press pretty well let it happen. 
		 
		We only have a few genuine investigative journalists in  
		the world, and 
		they include notably Seymour Hersh and 
 Robert Fisk. But even their work 
		must be subject to  
		evaluation. They can have things planted on them, and 
 they make mistakes. 
		 
		The WikiLeaks material is undoubtedly authentic, but 
 that does not at 
		all exclude an underlying purpose in  
		its release. 
		 
		It is a well-known practice of intelligence agencies to  
		give large bits 
		of genuine material, none of it too  
 of intelligence in return or to “bury” some damaging 
		 
		deception like a fish hook planted in a minnow. 
		 
		The CIA used to brag of having a huge house organ  
		whose keys could be 
		played to create the sense of a  
		Bach fugue of seeming news. It was 
		talking about all 
 the publications, both compliant and duped, in which 
 it could plant a story and have it reverberate ultimately  
		as a 
		convincing event. 
		 
		I’m not sure whether WikiLeaks itself falls into the  
		compliant or duped 
		category, but the nature of the  
		material, the main themes plus the many 
		important  
		things undoubtedly missing, say something important  
		to those 
		listening carefully. 
		 
		I am completely underwhelmed by the content of the  
		military WikiLeaks, 
		both this time and previously. 
		 
		Very little there that well-informed people did not already 
 know. Yes, 
		of course, the juicy tidbits about so-and-so 
 said are fun, and so they 
		are meant to be, but they are  
		not all that informative. 
		 
		I am sure there are countless lies and atrocities contained 
 in the 
		universe covered so far by WikiLeaks, but they are 
 not in the material 
		released. 
		 
		The idea that no one knows where Assange is also strikes 
 me as slightly 
		ridiculous in this age of massive 
 intelligence operations and the 
		trampling of individual 
 rights in the name of fighting terror. 
		 
		If you think otherwise because of Osama bin Laden, you  
		are rather late 
		in learning he has been dead since the  
		bombing of Tora Bora. The United 
		States has kept him 
 alive, as it were, for a focus in its insane War on 
		Terror. 
		 
		Cui bono? 
		 
		The US looks like an innocent victim, just guilty of 
 some unpleasant 
		gossip here and there. Who wouldn’t 
 know that? Israel gains support for 
		an attack on Iran. 
		 
		The leaks serve Israeli-Pentagon interests. 
		 
		And do so in a convincing, seemingly disinterested way. 
		 
		These leaks also serve America’s now cancerously- 
		swollen intelligence 
		apparatus in seeking more  
		repression and secrecy within American 
		society. 
		 
		Your off-hand dismissal is unfair and unwarranted. 
		 
		 
		8. 
		 
		From:
		
		http://ramallahonline.com/2010/12/wildfires- 
		
		and-wikileaks/ 
		 
		Wildfires and Wikileaks 
		 
		Mazin Qumsiyeh, 4 December 2010 
		 
		(...) 
		 
		Wikileaks 
		 
		The whole world is talking about the Wikileaks leaking 
 of previously 
		classified US documents. Now I  
		personally am skeptical about the 
		selective leaking of  
		documents that show only a tiny whiff of scandal 
		for  
		Israel. Most US foreign policy communication with  
		world leaders and 
		diplomats has been about protecting 
 Israeli war crimes and strengthening 
		Israeli positions. 
 This is known to be true of both public communication 
		 
		and secret communications (e.g. already declassified  
		material from the 
		Truman era). So I would be excused  
		to be skeptical when 300,000 
		documents are released  
		and only few of them deal with Israel. Much of 
		them 
 deal with how various actors (especially western  
		leaning Arab 
		dictators) dutifully tell their masters in 
 Washington (themselves 
		beholden to the Israel-first  
		lobbyists) that Iran is indeed the new Nazi 
		Germany  
		or the new Soviet Union. 
		 
		There are really two possibilities here 
		 
		1) That these “leaks” are a form of psy-ops  
		engineered (selected) to 
		benefit Israel’s plan of 
 confronting Iran. See for example 
 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/ 
		
		article26967.htm  
		and
		
		http://criminalstate.com/2010/12/wikileaks-–- 
		
		more-israeli-game-theory-warfare/ 
		and 
		
		http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-ruebner/wikileaks 
		
		-israels-securit_b_790100.html 
		 
		2) That they are psy-ops that are calculated by the US 
 and Israeli 
		governments to do a small amount of  
		exposure of sensitive material but a 
		lot of confusion 
 among public opinions in the world (in Europe and  
		Arab 
		countries) to change the focus from the  
		disastrously failing policies in 
		Palestine, Iraq,  
		Afghanistan, and Pakistan. (I saw such analysis in  
		Arab 
		media e.g.  
		
		http://hala.ps/ar/index.php?act=Show&id=62180 
 but little of it in 
		Western progressive media). 
		 
		Here is another analysis by Jonathan Cook:  
		Wikileaks and the New Global 
		Order 
		 
		“At work here is a set of global forces that the US, in its  
		hubris, 
		believed it could tame and dominate in its own  
		cynical interests. By the 
		early 1990s that arrogance  
		manifested itself in the claim of the “end of 
		history”: the 
 world’s problems were about to be solved by US- 
		sponsored 
		corporate capitalism. The new Wikileaks  
		disclosures will help to dent 
		those assumptions. If  
		a small group of activists can embarrass the most 
		 
		powerful nation on earth, the world’s finite resources  
		and its laws of 
		nature promise a much harsher lesson.” 
		
		http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details 
		
		.php?id=16449 
		 
		I disagree with many aspects of Fisk’s analysis below  
		but it is witty 
		and worth reading. 
		 
		Now We Know. America Really Doesn’t Care  
		about Injustice in the Middle 
		East. By Robert Fisk 
		
		http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/11/30-3 
		Political fires are raging and spin doctors in  
		governments are trying 
		hard to contain the fires 
 and change the subject but the real solution 
		for 
 most of our problems remain obvious to most 
 people: free Palestine – 
		end apartheid. 
		 
		CHECK ALSO: 
		 
		John Pilger: Wikileaks and The War You Don’t See 
 (December 3, 2010) 
		
		http://coto2.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/john-pilger- 
		
		wikileaks-and-the-war-you-dont-see/ 
		Award winning journalist John Pilger speaks on  
		Australian radio about 
		the absurdities put forward 
 by members of the American government. He 
		has 
 a new documentary coming out in Britain on  
		Dec. 12th called “The War 
		You Don’t See” which  
		features an interview with Julian Assange. To see 
 the trailer, go to
		 
		
		http://www.johnpilger.com/videos/the-war-you- 
		
		dont-see-trailer 
		 
		John Pilger "The Invisible Government" (Sept 25, 2007) 
		
		http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-uq7O1RqQQ 
		The Propaganda Arm Of The Invisible Government 
		 
		9. 
		 
		 
		From:
		
		http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/ 
		
		world/assange-threatens-to-release-entire-cache-of- 
		
		unfiltered-files/article1825922/ 
		 
		WikiLeaks founder threatens to release entire cache of  
		unfiltered files 
		 
		DOUG SAUNDERS - Dec. 05, 2010 
		 
		At the centre of a tightening web of death threats, sex- 
		crime 
		accusations and high-level demands for a treason 
 trial, WikiLeaks 
		founder Julian Assange threatened to  
		unleash a "thermonuclear device" of 
		completely  
		unexpurgated government files if he is forced to  
		appear 
		before authorities. 
		 
		Mr. Assange, the 39-year-old Australian Internet activist  
		whose online 
		document-leaking service has  
		embarrassed the United States and other 
		countries by 
 publishing hundreds of thousands of secret diplomatic 
 and 
		military documents, has referred to the huge, 
 unfiltered document as his 
		"insurance policy." 
		 
		The 1.3-gigabyte file, distributed through file-sharing  
		services this 
		summer and protected with an 
 unbreakable 256-bit encryption key, 
		contains full  
		versions of all the U.S. documents received by  
		WikiLeaks 
		to date - including those that have been  
		withheld from publication or 
		have had names and  
		details removed in order to protect the lives of 
		spies,  
		sources and soldiers. 
		 
		Silent for the better part of a week as WikiLeaks made  
		daily headlines 
		around the globe, Mr. Assange has been 
 increasingly vocal in recent 
		days, defending his actions, 
 decrying his critics and defying world 
		leaders. 
		 
		Mr. Assange's lawyer Mark Stephens warned that if  
		Mr. Assange were to be 
		brought to trial on rape  
		accusations he faces in Sweden, or for treason 
		charges 
 that have been suggested by U.S. politicians, he would  
		release 
		the encryption key. The tens of thousands of  
		people who have downloaded 
		the file would instantly  
		have access to the names, addresses and details 
		 
		contained in the file. 
		 
		WikiLeaks, Mr. Stephens said, has "been subject to  
		cyberattacks and 
		censorship around the world and they 
 need to protect themselves ... This 
		is what they believe  
		to be a thermonuclear device in the information 
		age." 
		 
		He uttered that threat as his client was believed to be in  
		hiding in 
		Britain, with prominent U.S. and Saudi officials 
 calling for Mr. 
		Assange's arrest or death, justice officials 
 attempting to shut down his 
		websites in many countries, 
 and the Swedish justice system seeking him 
		for 
 questioning on the sexual-crime allegations. 
		 
		Mr. Assange has denied the accusation, made by two 
 women who hosted a 
		party for him in Stockholm in  
		August. He has acknowledged having had 
		consensual 
 sex with the complainants. Reports say the sex became 
 non-consensual over disagreements about condom use. 
		 
		This weekend he refused to respond to a European arrest 
 warrant issued 
		by Sweden, and an Interpol alert related to 
 the accusation. His lawyers 
		argued that the accusations 
 amount to a smear campaign and suggested 
		that U.S. 
 officials might be behind them. 
		 
		The Swedish prosecutor took the unusual step of going 
 before the news 
		media to say she has received no  
		pressure or communication of any sort 
		from international 
 or political authorities and that the charges are 
		unrelated 
 to the leaks scandal. 
		 
		"This investigation has proceeded perfectly normally  
		without any 
		political pressure of any kind," prosecutor  
		Marianne Ny told the Agence 
		France-Presse wire service. 
 "It is completely independent." 
		 
		A number of high-profile U.S. figures, including  
		Republicans Sarah Palin 
		and Newt Gingrich, have called  
		for the prosecution of Mr. Assange. 
		 
		"Julian Assange is engaged in warfare," Mr. Gingrich said, 
 echoing 
		similar words spoken by Ms. Palin and others 
 last week. "Information 
		terrorism, which leads to people  
		getting killed, is terrorism. And 
		Julian Assange is engaged 
 in terrorism. He should be treated as an enemy 
		combatant  
		and WikiLeaks should be closed down permanently and 
		 
		decisively." 
		 
		However, U.S. charges against Mr. Assange are unlikely: 
 He is not a U.S. 
		citizen and, because he did not steal the  
		documents himself, but only 
		participated in their  
		publication, he would likely be protected under 
		the U.S. 
 Constitution's free-speech provisions. 
		 
		The documents were reportedly stolen from a U.S. military  
		installation 
		by Bradley Manning, a former private in the U.S. 
 Army who copied years 
		of secret Pentagon and State 
 Department communiqués and passed them to 
		Mr. Assange, 
 who in turn brokered deals with worldwide media outlets  
		to 
		publish details from them. Those details, despite some  
		censorship by Mr. 
		Assange and the publishers, have shaken 
 relations between the United 
		States and Gulf countries,  
		Russia, Afghanistan and Pakistan. 
		 
		Mr. Manning is already being held in solitary confinement, 
 and will 
		likely face treason and espionage charges. This  
		has not stopped a 
		growing chorus of U.S. and foreign  
		figures from pushing for punishment 
		for Mr. Assange. 
		 
		U.S. newspapers reported that a team of Justice Department 
 and Pentagon 
		investigators is looking into the possibility  
		of charges against Mr. 
		Assange under the Espionage Act.  
		Attorney-General Eric Holder said "this 
		is not sabre-rattling" 
 when asked by reporters about the possibility of 
		charges. 
 Justice officials in Australia, where Mr. Assange was born, 
 are 
		reportedly also looking into a prosecution. 
		 
		That did not stop more figures from suggesting that Mr.  
		Assange should 
		be harmed or killed - a circle that includes 
 Canadian Tom Flanagan, a 
		former campaign manager to  
		Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who told a TV 
		interviewer  
		last week that Mr. Assange should be assassinated (he later 
 apologized for the remark). 
		 
		In an online interview with the Guardian newspaper, Mr.  
		Assange said Mr. 
		Flanagan "should be charged with  
		incitement to commit murder." 
		 
		He also told reporters Barack Obama and his Secretary of 
 State, Hillary 
		Clinton, should resign if they are shown to 
 have authorized an operation 
		to spy on United Nations  
		top officials - one of the many secrets 
		revealed in the leaked 
 State Department cables. 
		 
		"Obama must answer what he knew about this illegal order 
 and when. If he 
		refuses to answer or there is evidence he  
		approved of these actions, he 
		must resign," the WikiLeaks 
 founder told the Spanish newspaper El Pais. 
		 
		He suggested, not for the first time, that he believes his  
		document 
		service has had a profound effect on world history:  
		"I believe 
		geopolitics will be separated into pre- and post 
		-Cablegate phases." 
		 
		Check also: 
		 
		A who's-who of the WikiLeaks allegations - 25 pictures and  
		descriptive 
		captions 
		
		http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/a-whos- 
		
		who-of-the-wikileaks-allegations/article1817540/? 
		
		from=1825922 
		Highlights of what the most recent WikiLeaks documents 
 claim, and who's 
		involved 
		 
		 
		10. 
		 
		From:
		
		http://original.antiwar.com/roberts/ 
		
		2010/11/30/who-precisely-is-attacking-the-world/ 
		 
		Who, Precisely, Is Attacking the World? 
		 
		by Paul Craig Roberts, December 01, 2010 
		 
		The stuck pigs are squealing. To shift the onus from the 
 U.S. State 
		Department, Hillary Clinton paints WikiLeaks’ 
 release of the “diplomatic 
		cables” as an “attack on the  
		international community.” To reveal truth 
		is equivalent, 
 in the eyes of the U.S. government, to an attack on the 
		 
		world. 
		 
		It is WikiLeaks’ fault that all those U.S. diplomats wrote  
		a quarter of 
		a million undiplomatic messages about  
		America’s allies, a.k.a. puppet 
		states. It is also WikiLeaks 
		’ fault that a member of the U.S. government 
		could no  
		longer stomach the cynical ways in which the U.S.  
		government 
		manipulates foreign governments to serve,  
		not their own people, but 
		American interests, and  
		delivered the incriminating evidence to 
		WikiLeaks. 
		 
		The U.S. government actually thinks that it was  
		WikiLeaks’ patriotic 
		duty to return the evidence and to  
		identify the leaker. After all, we 
		mustn’t let the rest of  
		the world find out what we are up to. They might 
		stop  
		believing our lies. 
		 
		The influential German magazine Der Spiegel writes:  
		“It is nothing short 
		of a political meltdown for U.S.  
		foreign policy.” 
		 
		This might be more a hope than a reality. The “Soviet 
 threat” during the 
		second half of the 20th century  
		enabled U.S. governments to create 
		institutions that 
 subordinated the interests of other countries to those 
 of the U.S. government. After decades of following U.S. 
 leadership, 
		European “leaders” know no other way to 
 act. Finding out that the boss 
		badmouths and deceives 
 them is unlikely to light a spirit of 
		independence. At  
		least not until America’s economic collapse becomes 
		 
		more noticeable. 
		 
		The question is: how much will the press tell us about 
 the documents? 
		Spiegel itself has said that the 
 magazine is permitting the U.S. 
		government to censor, 
 at least in part, what it prints about the leaked 
		material.  
		Most likely, this means the public will not learn the  
		content 
		of the 4,330 documents that “are so explosive  
		that they are labeled 
		‘NOFORN,’” meaning that  
		foreigners, including presidents, prime 
		ministers, and 
 security services that share information with the CIA 
 are 
		not permitted to read the documents. Possibly,  
		also, the content of the 
		16,652 cables classified as  
		“secret” will not be revealed to the public. 
		 
		Most likely the press, considering their readers’  
		interests, will focus 
		on gossip and the unflattering  
		remarks Americans made about their 
		foreign  
		counterparts. It will be good for laughs. Also, the  
		U.S. 
		government will attempt to focus the media in  
		ways that advance U.S. 
		policies. 
		 
		Indeed, it has already begun. On Nov. 29, National  
		Public Radio 
		emphasized that the cables showed that 
 Iran was isolated even in the 
		Muslim world, making it  
		easier for the Israelis and Americans to attack. 
		The 
 leaked cables reveal that the president of Egypt, an 
 American 
		puppet, hates Iran, and the Saudi Arabian 
 government has been long 
		urging the U.S.  
		government to attack Iran. In other words, Iran is so 
 dangerous to the world that even its co-religionists 
 want Iran wiped off 
		the face of the earth. 
		 
		NPR presented several nonobjective “Iranian experts” 
 who denigrated Iran 
		and its leadership and declared 
 that the U.S. government, by resisting 
		its Middle Eastern 
 allies’ call for bombing Iran, was the moderate in 
		the  
		picture. The fact that President George W. Bush declared 
 Iran to be 
		a member of “the axis of evil” and threatened  
		repeatedly to attack Iran 
		and that President Obama has  
		continued the threats – Adm. Michael 
		Mullen, chairman  
		of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, has just reiterated 
		that the 
 U.S. hasn’t taken the attack option off the table – are not 
		 
		regarded by American “Iran experts” as indications of  
		anything other 
		than American moderation. 
		 
		Somehow it did not come across the NPR newscast that  
		it is not Iran but 
		Israel that routinely slaughters civilians  
		in Lebanon, Gaza, and the 
		West Bank, and that it is not  
		Iran but the U.S. and its NATO mercenaries 
		who slaughter 
 civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Pakistan. 
		 
		Iran has not invaded any of its neighbors, but the  
		Americans are 
		invading countries halfway around the 
 globe. 
		 
		The “Iranian experts” treated the Saudi and Egyptian  
		rulers’ hatred of 
		Iran as a vindication of the U.S. and 
 Israeli governments’ demonization 
		of Iran. Not a single  
		“Iranian expert” was capable of pointing out that 
		the 
 tyrants who rule Egypt and Saudi Arabia fear Iran  
		because the 
		Iranian government represents the interests 
 of Muslims, and the Saudi 
		and Egyptian governments  
		represent the interests of the Americans. 
		 
		Think what it must feel like to be a tyrant suppressing  
		the aspirations 
		of your own people in order to serve the 
 hegemony of a foreign country, 
		while a nearby Muslim  
		government strives to protect its people’s 
		independence 
 from foreign hegemony. 
		 
		Undoubtedly, the tyrants become very anxious. What if  
		their oppressed 
		subjects get ideas? Little wonder the  
		Saudi and Egyptian rulers want the 
		Americans to 
 eliminate the independent-minded country that is a bad 
 example for Egyptian and Saudi subjects. 
		 
		As long as the dollar has enough value that it can be  
		used to purchase 
		foreign governments, information  
		damaging to the U.S. government is 
		unlikely to have 
 much affect. As Alain of Lille said a long time ago, 
		 
		“Money is all.” 
		
		 
		11. 
		 
		NOTE from Jean: Despite my initial misgivings about  
		what looks to 
		me like a sophisticated Psy-Op, several  
		people nevertheless point out 
		the fact that Wikileaks is 
 providing an invaluable service through 
		revealing the 
 true face of our governments and I wish to reflect this 
		 
		viewpoint as well... 
		 
		BUT BEFORE you get to review what I have from this  
		other viewpoint, here 
		is an excerpt from a LONG  
		comment by David Wilcock - who believes this 
		is part  
		of a staged preparation to get full disclosure of ET 
 presence 
		and contacts underway 
 (See
		
		WikiLeaks: new diplomatic cables contain UFO  
		
		details, Julian Assange 
		says): 
		 
		China's October Surprise III: The Fight for Disclosure  
		by David Wilcock 
		(5 December 2010) 
		
		http://divinecosmos.com/index.php/start-here/davids-blog/ 
		
		898-chinasurpriseiii 
		(...)  
		 
		My intuitive data has been very, very consistent in telling me  
		the 
		"negative elite" will not succeed. Any apparent victory  
		they may expect 
		to have is not part of the grander script  
		this planet is being led 
		through -- by high-level angelic  
		beings, for lack of a better 
		term.During the last three years 
 I have had at least 200 different 
		dreams all saying the Old  
		World Order will be defeated in a very obvious 
		and dramatic  
		fashion. These dreams continue right up to the present and 
 have not changed -- only gotten more intense.I have had 
 many years of 
		experience in how accurate this guidance can 
 be, particularly when you 
		get 'clusters' of data that all point  
		in the same direction. The dreams 
		have always said that  
		Disclosure won't happen until we see a clear and 
		 
		spectacular defeat of the Powers that Were on the world  
		stage first. The 
		two must work in conjunction.This is  
		exactly what's happening right now. 
		Open your eyes and 
 take a look at what you see. 
		 
		IS WIKILEAKS NOTHING MORE THAN "CONTROLLED  
		OPPOSITION? "Some reliable 
		insider sources, like  
		TBRNews, were trying to say Wikileaks was all 
		'controlled 
 opposition' -- at least as of November 21st  
		(emphasis 
		added): 
		http://tbrnews.org/wordpress/?p=237  
		Washington, D.C., November 21, 
		2010: “Although it is  
		not a matter of public knowledge, the facts 
		surrounding 
 the so-called ‘WikiLeaks’ are such that perhaps a little 
		 
		publicity would do no harm. This concept is a  
		government disinformation 
		site, designed to ‘leak’  
		information to the public that cannot be 
		published in  
		the mainline media. The ‘tens of thousands of vital 
		 
		messages’ dealing with Afghanistan have been tailor- 
		made to give Obama 
		the excuse to exit from  
		Afghanistan.Unfortunately, the Republican gains 
		in the 
 House have made this policy null and void. The new  
		Republicans do 
		not want to stop war, they want even  
		more -- and so Obama’s plans to get 
		out have been  
		scrapped. The earlier WikiLeaks stories were all 
		 
		low-level, not important to U.S. national security and, 
 aside from the 
		Administration, of interest only to  
		inane bloggers and their readers... 
		The CIA loves to  
		use people like Julian the Apostate because if they get 
		 
		caught, Langley always looks the other way and  
		murmurs, ‘Julian who?’ 
		 
		WIKILEAKS IS THE BLOOD IN THE WATER  
		 
		The problem with this argument is 
		that if you start a war,  
		you can end up getting shot. If you start a 
		wildfire, your  
		house could burn down. If this is 'controlled 
		opposition,' 
 then whoever started it has absolutely nothing to lose by 
 potentially disemboweling the entire national security 
 state. These were 
		the Drudge headlines from Monday, 
 November 29th... and they did not 
		sound good for the  
		Powers that Were. It's a veritable orgy of 'bad 
		news',  
		as far as they are concerned -- the "most embarrassing, 
 damaging 
		disclosure in decades": Wikileaks is the  
		blood in the water that turns 
		ordinary people into  
		hungry sharks when they're already pissed off about 
		 
		the economy. Many disgruntled insiders now have a  
		democratic, 
		unregulated way to create more leaks --  
		or make their own alternative 
		wiki sites if they can't  
		get through to Assange.If someone at the top 
		did  
		officially sanction Wikileaks, it's the political 
 equivalent -- at 
		least for the Powers that Were -- of  
		playing a hot-potato game with 
		nuclear fuel rods.  
		The news system isn't even designed to be able to 
 handle this much information at once. It typically  
		grabs two or three 
		stories in politics, entertainment, 
 sports, business, comedy, local, et 
		cetera and that's  
		basically what you get. CLIP 
		 
		AND HERE IS ALSO A REQUEST BY LONG-TIME  
		ERN SUBSCRIBER ILYES 
		(ilyes@earthlink.net) WHO 
 WOULD LIKE EVERYONE TO KEEP THIS SITUATION  
		IN 
		MIND DURING OUR MEDITATIONS TO HELP...  
		 
		"all the people of the world 
		a/w/a JulianAssange and 
 WikiLeaks, who DO understand what's going on and 
 also need to be held in The Light, considering the  
		indeed dangerous and 
		most urgent conflict on our  
		planet right now ... this is, for sure, the 
		'Armageddon 
 battle' between the forces of Light and Dark, the ones 
 (most 
		esp the US) who insist their dominion of  
		almost all of the world's govts 
		MUST prevail, using 
 their long-held and well-developed tool of Secrecy 
		 
		... I've given up on PrezObama, he's simply another 
 pawn who declines to 
		muster any inner strength he 
 might have behind his alleged convictions 
		... There's 
 a critical battle now in progress between the US 
		 
		(SecrecyControlAll) Govt and ALL the people of the  
		world who are 
		determined to birth the New World  
		which MUST manifest if we're to 
		continue as a  
		species, as a viable planet ... the battleground is 
 WikiLeaks (ie, 'everywhere') ... I know there are 
 many of us 'out here' 
		who 'get' the importance of  
		what's developing ... If one has doubts, one 
		simply 
 need take in the herculean efforts the US is making  
		to silence 
		WikiLeaks, reaching out and 'touching'  
		all the sovereigns, for starters, 
		and arm-twisting  
		them to take certain steps -- eg: according to their 
 lawyers, no Australian laws have been broken by  
		Assange, yet there's an 
		indication that Oz' govt has 
 been told to cancel his passport; also note 
		 
		Pakistan's response below; amazon.com was  
		ordered to pull WikiLeaks' 
		servers (which they'd  
		been hosting), and amazon caved; even Pravda  
		has 
		criticized the US, mocking it for these ongoing 
 violations of its 'free 
		speech' veneer] ..." 
		 
		Utterly surreal: Pravda justifiably criticising US for  
		trying to stifle 
		a free press... How times change! 
		 
		From:
		
		http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/ 
		
		03-12-2010/116041-valerie_plame_wikileaks-0/ 
		 
		Valerie Plame, YES! Wikileaks, NO! 
		 
		03.12.2010 
		 
		In my recent article Ward Churchill:  
		The Lie Lives On 
 (Pravda.Ru, 
		11/29/2010), I discussed the following  
		realities about America's legal 
		"system": it is  
		duplicitous and corrupt; it will go to any extremes to 
 insulate from prosecution, and in many cases civil  
		liability, persons 
		whose crimes facilitate this duplicity 
 and corruption; it has abdicated 
		its responsibility to 
 serve as a "check-and-balance" against the other 
		two 
 branches of government, and has instead been 
 transformed into a 
		weapon exploited by the wealthy,  
		the corporations, and the politically 
		connected to  
		defend their criminality, conceal their corruption and 
 promote their economic interests; and, finally, that 
 the oft-quoted 
		adage "Nobody is above the law" is 
 a lie. 
		 
		Some critics were quick to dismiss my article as  
		politically motivated 
		hyperbole. But with the recent 
 revelations disclosed by Wikileaks, it 
		appears that  
		this article did not even scratch the surface, because 
 it 
		is now evident that Barack Obama, who entered the  
		White House with 
		optimistic messages of change and 
 hope, is just as complicit in, and 
		manipulative of, the 
 legal "system's" duplicity and corruption as was 
		his  
		predecessor George W. Bush. 
		 
		For example, as I stated in the aforementioned article, 
 the Obama 
		administration has refused to prosecute  
		former Attorney General John 
		Ashcroft for abusing the 
 "material witness" statute; refused to 
		prosecute  
		Ashcroft's successor (and suspected perjurer) Alberto 
 Gonzales 
		for his role in the politically motivated  
		firing of nine federal 
		prosecutors; refused to prosecute 
 Justice Department authors of the now 
		infamous  
		"torture memos," like John Yoo and Jay Bybee; and, 
 more 
		recently, refused to prosecute former CIA  
		official Jose Rodriquez Jr. 
		for destroying tapes that 
 purportedly showed CIA agents torturing 
		detainees. 
		 
		Predictably, the official mantra supporting these  
		refusals is that 
		"exhaustive" investigations had been  
		conducted. But now, thanks to 
		Wikileaks, the world  
		has been enlightened to the fact that the Obama 
		 
		administration not only refused to prosecute these 
 individuals itself, 
		it also exerted pressure on the  
		governments of Germany and Spain not to 
		prosecute, 
 or even indict, any of the torturers or war criminals 
 from 
		the Bush dictatorship. 
		 
		This revelation invariably leads to three inescapable  
		conclusions: these 
		so-called "exhaustive 
 investigations" were a sham; the Obama 
		 
		administration never intended to prosecute such 
 crimes and, in fact, 
		went to inordinate lengths to  
		cover them up; and the American government 
		has  
		the proven capacity to influence the legal systems 
 of other 
		countries. 
		 
		And now, given the fact that Wikileaks founder Julian 
 Assange is facing 
		criminal charges in Sweden, it is 
 also evident that America even has the 
		Swedish 
 government and Interpol in its hip pocket. 
		 
		Of course, I do not know if Assange committed the  
		crime he is accused 
		of. I do know that to the  
		American legal "system" the truth is 
		irrelevant. The 
 minute Assange revealed the extent of America's 
 criminality and cover-ups to the world, he became 
 a marked man. And 
		America is going to do  
		anything it can to silence him. 
		 
		Already we see the treacherous Joe Lieberman, the 
 man who almost 
		single-handedly killed the "public 
 option" in the health care reform 
		bill so insurance 
 companies can continue to enjoy record profits, 
		 
		intimidate an American server into discontinuing 
 its transmission of 
		Wikileaks. 
		 
		And we see many right-wing commentators  
		demanding that Assange be hunted 
		down, with some 
 even calling for his murder, on the grounds that he 
 may 
		have endangered lives by releasing confidential 
 government documents. 
		 
		Yet, for the right-wing, this apparently was not a  
		concern when the late 
		columnist Robert Novak  
		"outed" CIA agent Valerie Plame after her husband 
 Joseph Wilson authored an OP-ED piece in The New 
 York Times criticizing 
		the motivations for waging 
 war against Iraq. Even though there was 
		evidence of 
 involvement within the highest echelons of the Bush 
 dictatorship, only one person, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, 
 was indicted and 
		convicted of "outing" Plame to 
 Novak. And, despite the fact that this 
		"outing"  
		potentially endangered the lives of Plame's overseas  
		contacts, 
		Bush commuted Libby's thirty-month  
		prison sentence, calling it 
		"excessive." 
		 
		Why the disparity? The answer is simple: The Plame  
		"outing" served the 
		interests of the military-industrial 
 complex and helped to conceal the 
		Bush 
 dictatorship's lies, tortures and war crimes, while 
 Wikileaks not 
		only exposed such evils, but also  
		revealed how Obama's administration, 
		and Obama 
 himself, are little more than "snake oil" merchants 
 pontificating about government accountability while 
 undermining it at 
		every turn. 
		 
		Of course, I realize that analogizing the Plame case to  
		Wikileaks is 
		imperfect, and I certainly do not support  
		the release of documents that 
		could endanger any lives. 
 But it should be remembered that threats to 
		murder 
 Assange are just as reprehensible. In addition, they  
		may serve to 
		dissuade future whistleblowers from  
		raising legitimate concerns about 
		government  
		corruption and criminality. 
		 
		And I should also note that while I avidly support the 
 prosecution of 
		those who lied, tortured and  
		committed war crimes during the Bush 
		dictatorship, 
 I certainly do not, unlike some critics of Assange, 
 advocate or support any violence against them, or 
 against any human 
		being, regardless of his or her 
 politics. 
		 
		Now there is talk of charging Assange under America's 
 so-called 
		"espionage" statutes. But American history 
 has shown how these statutes 
		have been incessantly 
 used to conceal government criminality. 
		 
		When the United States Constitution was being created, 
 a conflict 
		emerged between delegates who wanted a  
		strong federal government (the 
		Federalists) and those 
 who wanted a weak federal government (the 
		anti- 
		Federalists). 
		 
		Although the Federalists won the day, one of the most 
 distinguished 
		anti-Federalists, George Mason, refused 
 to sign the new Constitution, 
		sacrificing in the  
		process, some historians say, a revered place  
		amongst 
		America's founding fathers. 
		 
		Two of Mason's concerns were that the Constitution  
		did not contain a 
		Bill of Rights, and that the  
		presidential pardon powers would allow 
		corrupt 
 presidents to pardon people who had committed 
 crimes on 
		presidential orders. 
		 
		Mason's concerns about the abuse of the pardon  
		powers were eventually 
		proven right when Gerald 
 Ford pardoned Richard Nixon, when Ronald Reagan 
 pardoned FBI agents convicted of authorizing illegal 
 break-ins, and when 
		George H.W. Bush pardoned six  
		individuals involved in the Iran-Contra 
		Affair. 
		 
		Mason was also proven right after the Federalists  
		realized that the 
		States would not ratify the  
		Constitution unless a Bill of Rights was 
		added. But 
 this was done begrudgingly, as demonstrated by  
		America's 
		second president, Federalist John Adams, 
 who essentially destroyed the 
		right to freedom of  
		speech via the Alien and Sedition Acts, which made 
 it a crime to say, write or publish anything critical 
 of the United 
		States government. 
		 
		Years later, Adams' precedent would resurface during 
 the presidency of 
		Woodrow Wilson, this time via the 
 Espionage and Sedition Acts. Although 
		these laws  
		were designed to prohibit criticism of America's  
		involvement 
		in World War One, mainstream religious 
 leaders who criticized the war 
		were rarely prosecuted, 
 but persons and political organizations 
		considered to  
		be "radical," like Socialist leader Eugene Debs and 
		 
		members of the Industrial Workers of the World labor 
 union (IWW), were 
		imprisoned and their organizations 
 decimated. 
		 
		The McCarthy era of the 1950s brought forth the full 
 power of the Smith 
		Act, which was allegedly created 
 to punish communists who advocated the 
		violent  
		overthrow of the United States government, but was 
 ultimately 
		used to blacklist and, in many cases,  
		economically destroy members of 
		the political left. 
		 
		During the 1960s and 70s, after the courts diluted  
		much of the power of 
		the Sedition laws, government 
 tactics used to "neutralize" persons and 
		political  
		organizations became more covert. Some, like  
		actress Jean 
		Seberg, had false rumors circulated 
 about them in an attempt to destroy 
		their careers. 
 (Seberg ultimately committed suicide as a result  
		of one 
		of these rumors). Others, like Elmer  
		"Geronimo" Pratt, were framed and 
		imprisoned for 
 crimes they did not commit. And still others, like 
		 
		Chicago Black Panther leaders Fred Hampton and 
 Mark Clark, were murdered 
		outright. 
		 
		The ironic thing about these so-called "espionage" 
 acts is that they 
		actually invert the concepts of crime 
 and punishment. Most criminals 
		break laws that  
		others have created, and people who assist in 
 exposing 
		or apprehending them are usually lauded 
 as heroes. But with the 
		"espionage" acts, the  
		criminals themselves have actually created laws to 
 conceal their crimes, and exploit these laws to 
 penalize people who 
		expose them. 
		 
		The problem with America's system of government  
		is that it has become 
		too easy, and too convenient,  
		to simply stamp "classified" on documents 
		that  
		reveal acts of government corruption, cover-up, 
 mendacity and 
		malfeasance, or to withhold them 
 "in the interest of national security." 
		Given this web  
		of secrecy, is it any wonder why so many 
 Americans are 
		still skeptical about the "official"  
		versions of the John F. Kennedy or 
		Martin Luther  
		King Jr. assassinations, or the events surrounding  
		the 
		attacks of September 11, 2001? 
		 
		In the past, whenever I wrote about the evils of the 
 Bush dictatorship, 
		I often quoted a question folk 
 singer Phil Ochs rhetorically asked 
		during a 1968  
		concert in Vancouver, Canada: "What can you do  
		when you're 
		a helpless soul, a helpless piece of flesh, 
 amid all this cruel, cruel 
		machinery and terrible,  
		heartless men?" 
		 
		Ochs subsequently committed suicide in 1976, and  
		while I am uncertain 
		that this was the correct path to 
 take, I can certainly understand his 
		frustration.  
		Although the election of Barack Obama gave rise to  
		the 
		"outrage" expressed by the so-called "tea party" 
 movement, if there is 
		any political group in America 
 that has a right to be outraged, it is 
		the Progressives. 
 They bought into Obama's message of change and 
 hope, 
		believed that the criminals of the Bush 
 dictatorship would have to 
		answer for their crimes, 
 and naively dreamed that America's respect for 
		peace, 
 justice and human rights would be restored. 
		 
		But, as Wikileaks and the antics of Obama's "Justice" 
 Department have 
		shown, the Progressives were 
 deceived. Yet, as in the past, they are 
		forced to be 
 supportive of Obama's duplicity because the  
		alternative is 
		worse. 
		 
		I want to believe that the Wikileaks documents will 
 change America for 
		the better. But what undoubtedly  
		will happen is a repetition of the 
		past: those who  
		expose government crimes and cover-ups will be 
 prosecuted or branded as criminals; new laws will  
		be passed to silence 
		dissent; new Liebermans will  
		arise to intimidate the 
		corporate-controlled media;  
		and new ways will be found to conceal the 
		truth. 
		 
		What Wikileaks has done is make people understand  
		why so many Americans 
		are politically apathetic and  
		content to lose themselves in one or more 
		of the  
		addictions American culture offers, be it drugs, 
 alcohol, the 
		Internet, video games, celebrity gossip,  
		text-messaging-in essence 
		anything that serves to 
 divert attention from the harshness of reality. 
		 
		After all, the evils committed by those in power can 
 be suffocating, and 
		the sense of powerlessness that 
 erupts from being aware of these evils 
		can be  
		paralyzing, especially when accentuated by the 
 knowledge that 
		government evildoers almost always 
 get away with their crimes. The 
		prevalence of such  
		evils can shatter faith in goodness and sometimes 
		 
		even in God. They can transform virtues like honesty, 
 compassion, and 
		hope into vices and make those  
		who cling to them suffer in poverty, 
		depression and  
		sorrow. 
		 
		So shame on Barack Obama, Eric Holder, and all 
 those who spew platitudes 
		about integrity, justice  
		and accountability while allowing war criminals 
		and 
 torturers to walk freely upon the earth. And shame  
		on Germany and 
		Spain, and all those other guilty  
		countries, for allowing their sense of 
		justice to be 
 distorted by a nation that doesn't seem to know the 
 meaning of the word. 
		 
		And damn the right-wing outrage over the Wikileaks 
 revelations. It is 
		the American people who should be 
 outraged that its government has 
		transformed a  
		nation with a reputation for freedom, justice, 
 tolerance 
		and respect for human rights into a  
		backwater that revels in its 
		criminality, cover-ups, 
 injustices and hypocrisies. 
		 
		So savor the Wikileaks documents while you can,  
		because soon they'll be 
		gone. And for the  
		government criminals of the world, and for those 
 who 
		protect them, it will again be business as usual. 
		 
		David R. Hoffman - Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru 
		 
		--- 
		 
		AMONG THE MANY COMMENTS THERE... 
		 
		"This article is spot on. As an American, I am appalled 
 at the actions 
		of my country and government 
 regarding Wikileaks. As a citizen of the 
		world, I am 
 furious that other governments would cooperate in 
 such a 
		focused and obvious attempt to squash  
		freedom of speech and the freedoms 
		of the press,  
		some of our most important values as Americans. 
 I'm no fan 
		of propaganda from any side of the fence. 
 From a purely objective 
		viewpoint, anyone who  
		believes in the US Constitution, must be in 
		support of  
		Wikileaks, simply because the first amendment  
		guarantees the 
		right to free speech. I have heard the  
		arguments about how this is 
		comparable to the  
		famous exception of yelling "fire" in a crowded 
		theater, 
 but really this is not remotely the same thing. I am a  
		citizen 
		of the United States, and as such, I have a right 
 to know what my 
		government is doing in my name,  
		and my government has a duty to inform 
		me. We  
		will no longer tolerate being lied to, or frightened over 
 imaginary threats in order that we concede even more  
		power into the 
		hands of a corrupt government. These 
 documents were leaked by an 
		American, and as a  
		soldier, PFC. Manningr is sworn to defend the 
		 
		Constitution of the US. I believe that he was doing 
 exactly that when he 
		decided that the world needed  
		to see these documents." 
		 
		"The Americans accuse gestapo and kgb of spying  
		their own people - at 
		the same time they spy every  
		man alive on the planet!!they accuse 
		nationalists of  
		labour camps - in the meantime a god knows what  
		happens 
		in Guantanamo and all the other secret cia  
		camps around the world. They 
		accuse nationalist  
		Germany and Ussr for no freedom of press,  
		suppressed 
		opinion and sh** like that - while they  
		close down websites, they (most 
		likely) accuse  
		people (like Assange) with no evidence, they set  
		ransom 
		for people's head, they shoot and kill  
		reporters and children,they use 
		chemical and  
		biological weapons,they used atomic bombs, they  
		create 
		guerrillas to overthrow governments and then 
 they call them 
		terrorists,etc..they try to transform  
		the meaning of "global peace" so 
		that anyone who  
		doesn't shut up and do what America wants is  
		branded a 
		terrorist. I'm not suprised by Hillary.  
		Reinhard Gehlen was the man they 
		employed back 
 in the old days to set up their spying network which  
		works 
		the same way today." 
		 
		MUCH MORE THOROUGH... 
		 
		WikiLeaks news roundup 
		http://twitter.com/wikileaks 
		 
		WikiLeaks now available at 
		http://wikileaks.de/   
		
		http://wikileaks.fi/  
		http://wikileaks.nl/ 
		 
		LOTS of mirror sites of wikileaks! IT IS OUT THERE  
		AND CANNOT BE DELETED 
		FROM THE WEB NOW!! 
		http://typewith.me/wikileaks
		
		 
		 
		Live Q&A with Julian Assange 
		http://j.mp/fBx8hs 
		 
		Julian Assange: Why the world needs WikiLeaks
		 
		
		http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/julian_assange 
		
		
		_why_the_world_needs_wikileaks.html/a> 
		 
		TIME's Julian Assange Interview: Full Transcript/Audio 
		
		
		http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2034040- 
		
		2,00.html 
		RS: How would you characterize your actions, both in  
		this latest set of 
		leaks as well as in the past? Would you  
		say you're practicing civil 
		disobedience against breaking 
 the law in order to expose greater 
		law-breaking? Is that 
 the moral calculus that you use to justify the 
		leaks? 
		 
		JA: No, not at all. This organization practices civil  
		obedience, that 
		is, we are an organization that tries to 
 make the world more civil and 
		act against abusive  
		organizations that are pushing it in the opposite 
		 
		direction. As for the law, we have now in our four-year 
 history had over 
		100 legal attacks of various kinds  
		and have been victorious in all of 
		those matters. So if  
		you want to talk about the law, it's very important 
		to r 
		emember the law is not what, not simply what,  
		powerful people would 
		want others to believe it is.  
		The law is not what a general says it is. 
		The law is not  
		what Hillary Clinton says it is. The law is not what a 
		 
		bank says it is. The law, rather, is what the Supr 
		eme  
		Court in [the] 
		land in the end says it is, and the  
		Supreme Court in the case of the 
		United States has  
		an enviable Constitution on which to base its 
		 
		decisions. And that Constitution comes out of a  
		revolutionary movement 
		and has a Bill of Rights  
		appraised by James Madison and others that 
		 
		includes a nuanced understanding for the  
		balancing of power of [the] 
		states in relation to 
		the government. CLIP 
		 
		NO SECRETS: Julian Assange’s mission for total  
		transparency. 
		
		http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/ 
		
		06/07/100607fa 
		
		_fact_khatchadourian?currentPage=1 
		 
		(...) Assange is an international trafficker, of sorts. 
 He and his 
		colleagues collect documents and  
		imagery that governments and other 
		institutions 
 regard as confidential and publish them on a Web  
		site 
		called WikiLeaks.org. Since it went online, three 
 and a half years ago, 
		the site has published an  
		extensive catalogue of secret material, 
		ranging from 
 the Standard Operating Procedures at Camp Delta, 
 in 
		Guantánamo Bay, and the “Climategate” e-mails 
 from the University of 
		East Anglia, in England, to the 
 contents of Sarah Palin’s private Yahoo 
		account. The  
		catalogue is especially remarkable because WikiLeaks 
 is not 
		quite an organization; it is better described as 
 a media insurgency. It 
		has no paid staff, no copiers,  
		no desks, no office. Assange does not 
		even have a  
		home. He travels from country to country, staying  
		with 
		supporters, or friends of friends—as he once put  
		it to me, “I’m living 
		in airports these days.” He is the  
		operation’s prime mover, and it is 
		fair to say that  
		WikiLeaks exists wherever he does. At the same time, 
 hundreds of volunteers from around the world help 
 maintain the Web 
		site’s complicated infrastructure; 
 many participate in small ways, and 
		between three  
		and five people dedicate themselves to it full time.  
		Key 
		members are known only by initials—M, for  
		instance—even deep within 
		WikiLeaks, where  
		communications are conducted by encrypted online  
		chat 
		services. The secretiveness stems from the  
		belief that a populist 
		intelligence operation with  
		virtually no resources, designed to 
		publicize  
		information that powerful institutions do not want  
		public, 
		will have serious adversaries. CLIP 
		 
		KEEP US STRONG - Help Wikileak keep  
		governments open 
		http://213.251.145.96/ 
		WikiLeaks is a non-profit media organization  
		dedicated to bringing 
		important news and  
		information to the public. We provide an  
		innovative, 
		secure and anonymous way for  
		independent sources around the world to 
		leak 
 information to our journalists. We publish  
		material of ethical, 
		political and historical  
		significance while keeping the identity of our 
 sources anonymous, thus providing a universal 
 way for the revealing of 
		suppressed and censored  
		injustices. WikiLeaks relies on its supporters 
		in  
		order to stay strong. Please keep us at the  
		forefront of 
		anti-censorship and support 
		us today. 
 You can also 
		read more about WikiLeaks, our 
		
		 mission and objectives. 
		 
		Library of Congress Is Latest Government  
		Institution to Block Wikileaks 
		
		http://gawker.com/5705492/library-of-congress 
		
		-is-latest-government-institution-to-block-wikileaks 
		The Library of Congress has blocked access to the 
 Wikileaks site on its 
		staff computers and on the  
		wireless network that visitors use, two 
		sources tell  
		TPM.The error message reportedly reads:Ad or  
		Website 
		blocked by LC DNSBH. Advertisements 
 or websites that may be malicious 
		are blocked.If 
 this message appears in lieu of an advertisement  
		(i.e., 
		on part of the page), the advertisement site  
		may be malicious. However 
		the website is safe to  
		use.If this message appears on a page by itself, 
		 
		the website is blocked due to potential malicious 
 content. More 
		information - LC IT Security - A  
		spokesman for the library could not 
		immediately  
		comment, but expects to have a statement shortly. 
 The 
		library is a governmental institution and  
		serves as the research arm for 
		Congress. It was  
		established in 1800 and, when it was burned down  
		by the 
		British in 1814, Thomas Jefferson donated  
		his own personal library to 
		replace it. (Not for free,  
		though; Congress paid $23,950 for the books.) 
		It  
		has grown ever since and, according to the library, 
 it has "more than 
		144 million items including more 
 than 33 million cataloged books and 
		other print  
		materials in 460 languages; more than 63 million 
		 
		manuscripts; the largest rare book collection in  
		North America; and the 
		world's largest collection  
		of legal materials, films, maps, sheet music 
		and  
		sound recordings."The State and Commerce  
		departments have also 
		reportedly told their  
		employees not to look at the Wikileaks cables, 
		 
		while the
		
		Department of Education reportedly  
		
		blocked it entirely. - CHECK ALSO
		
		U.S. Military in  
		
		Iraq Tries to Intimidate Soldiers Into Not Reading 
		 
		
		Wikileaks 
		 
		WikiLeaks cables condemn Russia as 'mafia state'  
		(1 December 2010) 
		
		http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/0 
		
		1/wikileaks-cables-russia-mafia-kleptocracy 
		 
		Kremlin relies on criminals and rewards them  
		with political patronage, 
		while top officials collect 
 bribes 'like a personal taxation system' 
		 
		Is Wikileaks Really the Enemy? (Nov 29, 2010) 
		
		http://www.philipbrennan.net/2010/11/29/is- 
		
		wikileaks-really-the-enemy/ 
		Editor's Note: I am of the opinion that WikiLeaks  
		mean well but they are 
		not too careful with double  
		checking the validity of their sources. Many 
		of us  
		believe that WikiLeaks are being used by AIPAC 
 to further the 
		agenda of the Industrial Military  
		Complex by discrediting the 
		foundations of the US  
		Government, which will allow President Obama to 
		 
		rule by Executive Order in the new year...Robert 
 LeJeune: As I watched 
		Morning Joe with Joe  
		Scarborough, I came to wonder exactly why it is 
 we 
		are starting to view Wikileaks as the enemy,  
		and not the U.S Government 
		itself! All you really  
		have to do is scan over the cables and war logs, 
		 
		and the real enemy becomes clear! I find it very  
		disturbing that Mr. 
		Scarbourough can sit there  
		and condemn a PFC and Wikileaks for releasing 
 the information, yet does nothing to indicate the 
 guilt of the United 
		States Administration for the  
		content of the release. When you step back 
		and  
		actually start to review the information in the  
		cables and war logs, 
		those whom are our leaders 
 should be the ones under the gun. Once 
		reviewed, 
 we find that the current, and prior administration, 
 are the 
		ones whom have continued to lie to the  
		American people and the world, as 
		to their actions 
 in these illegal wars. We find that there have been 
 over 100 thousand civilian deaths in the ongoing  
		wars, not the 20 or 30 
		thousand we were told in 
 press releases and statements given by both 
		 
		administrations. Without the PFC and Wikileaks,  
		it may have been decades 
		before the American  
		people were told the truth as to what was done in 
 their name, if we would have ever been told the  
		truth at all! I just 
		wonder the actual number of  
		civilian deaths in Viet Nam, in light of the 
		fact that  
		our government has demonstrated a willingness  
		to openly lie to 
		us. CLIP 
		 
		Don’t Abandon Julian Assange Now by Steve  
		Beckow (Dec 5, 2010) 
		
		http://stevebeckow.com/2010/12/05/dont-abandon 
		
		-julian-assange-now/ 
		The latest attack on Julian Assange has come  
		from lightworker Jane 
		Burgermeister. (1) 
 Numerous attacks are coming from various  
		quarters, 
		many of them lightworkers.The current  
		attack suggests that the Economist 
		gave Assange 
 an award in 2008 and the Economist is owned by 
 the 
		Rothschilds. It also suggests that Amnesty  
		International gave Assange an 
		award and AI is  
		alleged to have a connection to the UN and IMF.  
		(...) 
		The effect of Julian’s and Wikileaks’  
		disclosure is to make it more 
		difficult for an i 
		llegal war to be waged in Afghanistan and Iraq.  
		The 
		effect of the lightworker suggestions that  
		Julian is a tool of the cabal 
		is to nullify the impact  
		of that disclosure.You have to decide whether 
		 
		you’re going to abandon Julian now and watch the 
 cabal survive the 
		frontal assault that Julian’s  
		efforts represent or take the risk of 
		possibly making  
		a bad decision but have the full impact of Wikileaks’ 
 disclosure stand.Never mind the personalities  
		involved. The Wikileaks 
		disclosure is our best shot  
		at tying the cabal in knots. Abandon Julian 
		Assange 
 now and we will lose that tool in our toolbox. (...)  
		Don’t let 
		it play upon your desire to be honest and  
		moral by feeding you 
		information that makes it  
		seem as if Julian is compromised – sex 
		scandals,  
		awards received, connections, whatever. Even if 
 they are true, 
		which I don’t think they are, the time  
		to deal with that will be later. 
		Now is the time to  
		stand firm. CLIP 
		 
		U.N. Special Rapporteur Juan Méndez: Instead of  
		Focusing on Assange, 
		U.S. Should Address 
 WikiLeaks’ Disclosures of Torture  
		(December 02, 
		2010)  
		
		http://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/2/un 
		
		_special_rapporteur_juan_mendez_instead 
		 
		One of the leaked U.S. State Department cables  
		released by WikiLeaks 
		urges diplomats to gather  
		intelligence about "plans and intentions of 
		member 
 states or UN Special Rapporteurs to press for  
		resolutions or 
		investigations into US  
		counterterrorism strategies and treatment of 
		 
		detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan or Guantanamo. 
		" We speak to Juan Méndez, 
		the new U.N. Special  
		Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman 
 and 
		Degrading Treatment or Punishment. He has 
 called on the United States to 
		investigate and  
		prosecute torture committed under former  
		President 
		George W. Bush. He also said he hopes 
 to visit Iraq and Guantánamo Bay 
		to probe  
		widespread torture allegations. Méndez says, "We  
		seem to be 
		focusing on whether disclosing these  
		cables ... merits some kinds of 
		action against Julian  
		Assange... I’m very concerned about the documents 
 that show that literally thousands of people were  
		first imprisoned by 
		American forces and then  
		transferred to the control of forces in Iraq 
		and  
		perhaps even in Afghanistan, where they knew that 
 these people were 
		going to be tortured." 
		 
		Is WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange a Hero?  
		Glenn Greenwald Debates Steven 
		Aftergood of  
		Secrecy News (December 03, 2010) 
		
		http://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/3/is_ 
		
		wikileaks_julian_assange_a_hero 
		WikiLeaks is coming under attack from all sides.  
		The U.S. government and 
		embassies around the 
 world are criticizing the whistleblowing group for 
 releasing a massive trove of secret State  
		Department cables. The 
		WikiLeaks website is  
		struggling to stay online just days after Amazon 
 pulled the site from its servers following political 
 pressure. The U.S. 
		State Department has blocked 
 all its employees from accessing the site 
		and is  
		warning all government employees not to read the 
 cables, even at 
		home. "These attacks will not stop  
		our mission, but should be setting 
		off alarm bells 
 about the rule of law in the United States," said 
		 
		WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. We host a  
		debate between Steven 
		Aftergood, a transparency  
		advocate who has become a leading critic of 
		 
		WikiLeaks, and Glenn Greenwald, a constitutional  
		law attorney and legal 
		blogger for Salon.com 
		 
		L'hébergement de WikiLeaks en France menacé 
 (03.12.10) 
		
		http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2010/ 
		
		12/03/eric-besson-demande-que-le-site-wikileaks-ne 
		
		-soit-plus-heberge-en-france_1448661_651865.html 
		Eric Besson et les services de l'Etat peuvent-ils faire 
 interdire 
		l'hébergement de WikiLeaks par la société 
 roubaisienne OVH ? "C'est au 
		juge d'en décider", 
		 
 répond en substance Octave Klaba, fondateur d'OVH, 
 dans un message sur le forum de sa société. Il  
		annonce également qu'OVH 
		va saisir le juge des 
 référés "afin qu'il se prononce sur la légalité ou 
		pas 
 de ce site sur le territoire français (...) compte tenu  
		de pressions 
		qui commencent réellement à se faire  
		sentir, même à Roubaix Valley". 
		(...) OVH n'héberge  
		pas la totalité des serveurs de WikiLeaks. D'après 
		 
		ZDNet, ces derniers se partageraient entre la France,  
		la Suède et les 
		Etats-Unis. Plus précisément, la  
		société suédoise Bahnhof a confirmé à 
		ZDNet 
 qu'elle hébergeait deux serveurs de WikiLeaks.  
		"Nous leur 
		fournissons uniquement des ressources  
		et n'avons aucun contrôle sur leur 
		contenu ou la  
		façon dont ils gèrent leur trafic", a précisé la 
		porte 
		-parole de l'hébergeur. Toujours selon le site  
		spécialisé, Bahnhof 
		héberge la page 
 Collateralmurder.com, qui contient la vidéo d'un 
		 
		hélicoptère de l'armée américaine tirant sur des civils 
 irakiens.OVH 
		héberge, quant à lui, les pages  
		WikiLeaks.ch et Cablegate.wikileaks.org, 
		qui  
		contient les fameux câbles diplomatiques. Les  
		pages des War Logs 
		(carnets de guerre) d'Irak et  
		d'Afghanistan seraient hébergées aux 
		Etats-Unis 
 par le Massachusetts Institute of Technology,  
		selon
		
		ZDNet, qui n'a pas encore pu avoir  
		confirmation officielle de la 
		part de celui-ci. Les 
 pages en question sont actuellement sous le  
		coup 
		d'une cyber-attaque. En parallèle, des 
 groupes d'internautes à travers 
		le monde se  
		sont mobilisés pour héberger sur leurs propres 
 serveurs des 
		"sites-miroirs" de WikiLeaks, 
		 
		c'est-à-dire la copie exacte du site original.  
		Plusieurs de ces 
		initiatives proviennent de  
		France, comme pour le miroir
		Wikileaks.fdn.fr. 
 CLIP 
		 
		
		
  
		 
		12. 
		 
		 
		From:
		
		http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfre 
		
		e/cifamerica/2010/dec/06/western-democracies- 
		
		must-live-with-leaks 
		 
		Live with the WikiLeakable world or shut down  
		the net. It's your choice 
		 
		Western political elites obfuscate, lie and bluster 
 – and when the veil 
		of secrecy is lifted, they try  
		to kill the messenger 
		 
		John Naughton - 6 December 201 
		 
		'Never waste a good crisis" used to be the  
		catchphrase of the Obama team 
		in the runup to  
		the presidential election. In that spirit, let us see 
		 
		what we can learn from official reactions to the  
		WikiLeaks revelations. 
		 
		The most obvious lesson is that it represents the  
		first really sustained 
		confrontation between the  
		established order and the culture of the 
		internet.  
		There have been skirmishes before, but this is the 
 real thing. 
		 
		And as the backlash unfolds – first with deniable  
		attacks on internet 
		service providers hosting  
		WikiLeaks, later with companies like Amazon 
		and 
 eBay and PayPal suddenly "discovering" that their 
 terms and 
		conditions preclude them from offering  
		services to WikiLeaks, and then 
		with the US  
		government attempting to intimidate Columbia  
		students 
		posting updates about WikiLeaks on  
		Facebook – the intolerance of the old 
		order is  
		emerging from the rosy mist in which it has  
		hitherto been 
		obscured. The response has been  
		vicious, co-ordinated and potentially 
		 
		comprehensive, and it contains hard lessons for 
 everyone who cares about 
		democracy and about 
 the future of the net. 
		 
		There is a delicious irony in the fact that it is now 
 the so-called 
		liberal democracies that are  
		clamouring to shut WikiLeaks down. 
		 
		Consider, for instance, how the views of the US 
 administration have 
		changed in just a year. On 21 
 January, secretary of state Hillary 
		Clinton made a  
		landmark speech about internet freedom, in  
		Washington DC, 
		which many people welcomed and 
 most interpreted as a rebuke to China for 
		its alleged 
 cyberattack on Google. "Information has never been 
 so free," 
		declared Clinton. "Even in authoritarian  
		countries, information networks 
		are helping people 
 discover new facts and making governments more 
		 
		accountable." 
		 
		She went on to relate how, during his visit to China  
		in November 2009, 
		Barack Obama had "defended the 
 right of people to freely access 
		information, and said 
 that the more freely information flows the 
		stronger  
		societies become. He spoke about how access to  
		information 
		helps citizens to hold their governments 
 accountable, generates new 
		ideas, and encourages 
 creativity." Given what we now know, that Clinton 
		 
		speech reads like a satirical masterpiece. 
		 
		One thing that might explain the official hysteria 
 about the revelations 
		is the way they expose how  
		political elites in western democracies have 
		been  
		deceiving their electorates. 
		 
		The leaks make it abundantly clear not just that the 
 US-Anglo-European 
		adventure in Afghanistan is  
		doomed but, more important, that the 
		American,  
		British and other Nato governments privately admit 
 that too. 
		 
		The problem is that they cannot face their electorates 
 – who also happen 
		to be the taxpayers funding this  
		folly – and tell them this. The leaked 
		dispatches from 
 the US ambassador to Afghanistan provide vivid 
		 
		confirmation that the Karzai regime is as corrupt and 
 incompetent as the 
		South Vietnamese regime in 
 Saigon was when the US was propping it up in 
		the  
		1970s. And they also make it clear that the US is as  
		much a captive 
		of that regime as it was in Vietnam. 
		 
		The WikiLeaks revelations expose the extent to  
		which the US and its 
		allies see no real prospect of 
 turning Afghanistan into a viable state, 
		let alone a 
 functioning democracy. They show that there is no 
 light at 
		the end of this tunnel. But the political  
		establishments in Washington, 
		London and  
		Brussels cannot bring themselves to admit this. 
		 
		Afghanistan is, in that sense, a quagmire in the same 
 way that Vietnam 
		was. The only differences are that 
 the war is now being fought by 
		non-conscripted  
		troops and we are not carpet-bombing civilians. 
		 
		The attack of WikiLeaks also ought to be a wake-up  
		call for anyone who 
		has rosy fantasies about whose  
		side cloud computing providers are on. 
		These are  
		firms like Google, Flickr, Facebook, Myspace and  
		Amazon which 
		host your blog or store your data on 
 their servers somewhere on the 
		internet, or which  
		enable you to rent "virtual" computers – again 
		 
		located somewhere on the net. The terms and 
 conditions under which they 
		provide both "free" and 
 paid-for services will always give them grounds 
		for  
		dropping your content if they deem it in their interests 
 to do so. 
		The moral is that you should not put your  
		faith in cloud computing – one 
		day it will rain on your 
 parade. 
		 
		Look at the case of Amazon, which dropped 
 WikiLeaks from its Elastic 
		Compute Cloud the  
		moment the going got rough. It seems that Joe 
		 
		Lieberman, a US senator who suffers from a  
		terminal case of hubris, 
		harassed the company over 
 the matter. Later Lieberman declared grandly 
		that  
		he would be "asking Amazon about the extent of its 
 relationship 
		with WikiLeaks and what it and other 
 web service providers will do in 
		the future to ensure 
 that their services are not used to distribute 
		stolen, 
 classified information". This led the New Yorker's  
		Amy Davidson 
		to ask whether "Lieberman feels that  
		he, or any senator, can call in the 
		company running 
 the New Yorker's printing presses when we are 
 preparing 
		a story that includes leaked classified  
		material, and tell it to stop 
		us". 
		 
		What WikiLeaks is really exposing is the extent to  
		which the western 
		democratic system has been  
		hollowed out. In the last decade its 
		political elites 
 have been shown to be incompetent (Ireland, the  
		US and 
		UK in not regulating banks); corrupt (all 
 governments in relation to the 
		arms trade); or  
		recklessly militaristic (the US and UK in Iraq). And 
 yet 
		nowhere have they been called to account in 
 any effective way. Instead 
		they have obfuscated,  
		lied or blustered their way through. And when, 
		 
		finally, the veil of secrecy is lifted, their reflex  
		reaction is to kill 
		the messenger. 
		 
		As Simon Jenkins put it recently in the Guardian, 
 "Disclosure is messy 
		and tests moral and legal  
		boundaries. It is often irresponsible and 
		usually 
 embarrassing. But it is all that is left when 
 regulation does 
		nothing, politicians are cowed, 
 lawyers fall silent and audit is 
		polluted.  
		Accountability can only default to disclosure."  
		What we are 
		hearing from the enraged officialdom  
		of our democracies is mostly the 
		petulant  
		screaming of emperors whose clothes have been 
 shredded by the 
		net. 
		 
		Which brings us back to the larger significance of 
 this controversy. The 
		political elites of western 
 democracies have discovered that the 
		internet can 
 be a thorn not just in the side of authoritarian  
		regimes, 
		but in their sides too. It has been comical 
 watching them and their 
		agencies stomp about the 
 net like maddened, half-blind giants trying to 
		whack 
 a mole. It has been deeply worrying to watch terrified 
 internet 
		companies – with the exception of Twitter, 
 so far – bending to their 
		will. 
		 
		But politicians now face an agonising dilemma. The 
 old, mole-whacking 
		approach won't work. WikiLeaks 
 does not depend only on web technology. 
		 
		Thousands of copies of those secret cables – and 
 probably of much else 
		besides – are out there, 
 distributed by peer-to-peer technologies like 
		Bit 
		Torrent. Our rulers have a choice to make: either 
 they learn to live 
		in a WikiLeakable world, with all 
 that implies in terms of their future 
		behaviour; or  
		they shut down the internet. Over to them. 
		
		 
		13. 
		 
		From:
		
		http://www.naturalnews.com/030647_ 
		
		Wikileaks_net_neutrality.html">http://www. 
		
		naturalnews.com/030647_Wikileaks_net_ 
		
		neutrality.html 
		 
		Net neutrality, the FCC, Wikileaks and the future 
 of internet freedom 
		 
		(NaturalNews) Regardless of what you think about 
 the Wikileaks release 
		of state secrets, there's no  
		debating the astonishing fact that the 
		internet made  
		these leaks possible. Without the internet, no single 
		 
		organization such as Wikileaks would have been 
 able to so widely 
		propagate secret government  
		information and make it public. In the old 
		model of  
		information distribution -- centralized mainstream 
 media 
		newspapers and news broadcasts -- such  
		information would have been 
		tightly controlled  
		thanks to government pressure. 
		 
		But the Internet allows individual information  
		publishers to bypass the 
		censorship of government. 
 In the case of Wikileaks, it allowed an 
		Australian  
		citizen to embarrass the U.S. government while  
		sitting at a 
		laptop computer in the United Kingdom. 
		 
		Governments don't like to be embarrassed. They  
		don't like their secrets 
		aired on the Internet. Sure, it's 
 okay for governments to tap all ofyour 
		secrets by 
 monitoring your phone calls, emails and web  
		browsing habits, 
		but every government seeks to  
		protect its own secrets at practically any 
		cost. That's 
 why the upshot of this Wikileaks release may be that 
 governments will now start to look for new ways to 
 censor and control 
		the internet in order to prevent  
		such information leaks from happening 
		in the 
 future. 
		 
		What governments around the world are suddenly 
 beginning to realize is 
		thata free internet is ultimately 
 incompatible with government secrets, 
		and secrets  
		are essential to any government that wants to remain 
 in 
		power. That's because, as even Noam Chomsky  
		stated in this DemocracyNow 
		video interview (http://www.democracynow.org/2010/11/30/noam_ 
		chomsky_wikileaks_cables_reveal_profound), 
		most 
 government secrets are based on information 
 governments wouldn't 
		want their people to discover 
 -- secrets that might threaten the 
		legitimacy of 
 government if the people found out the truth. 
		 
		How the FCC plans to seize authority over the 
 internet 
		 
		As part of a long-term plan to control content on 
 the internet, the 
		FCC is now attempting to assert   
		authority over the internet in the 
		same way it has 
 long exercised content censorship authority over 
 broadcast television and radio. 
		 
		The reason you can't say those seven dirty words  
		on broadcast 
		television, in other words, is because  
		the FCC controls broadcast 
		television content and  
		can simply revoke the broadcast licenses of any 
 television station that refuses to comply. This is the 
 same tactic, in 
		the internet world, of yanking a web 
 site's domain name, which the 
		Department of  
		Homeland Security has already begun doing over  
		the last 
		several weeks (http://www.naturalnews.com/ 
		030542_censorship_internet.html). 
		 
		The FCC also controls content on the radio and can 
 yank the broadcast 
		licenses of any radio stations 
 that refuse to comply with its content 
		censorship.  
		This is why operators of "pirate radio stations" are 
 dealt 
		with so harshly: For the government to allow 
 any radio station to 
		operate outside its censorship 
 and control is to invite dissent. 
		 
		The internet, of course, has been operating freely  
		and without any real 
		government censorship for  
		roughly two decades. In that time, it has 
		grown to 
 be what is arguably the most influential medium in 
 the world 
		for information distribution. Most  
		importantly, the internet is the 
		medium of 
 information freedom that is not controlled by any 
 government. 
		 
		The U.S. government wants to change all that, and 
 they've dispatched the 
		FCC to reign in the  
		"freedoms" of the internet. 
		 
		How to crush internet Free Speech 
		 
		The first step to the FCC's crushing of internet 
 freedom is to assert 
		authority over the internet 
 by claiming to run the show. The FCC, of 
		course, 
 has no legal authority over the internet. It was only 
 granted 
		authority in 1934 over broadcast  
		communications in the electromagnetic 
		spectrum 
 -- you know, radio waves and antennas, that kind 
 of thing. 
		 
		There is nothing in the Communications Act of  
		1934 that grants the FCC 
		any authority over the  
		internet because obviously the internet didn't 
		exist 
 then, and it would have been impossible for  
		lawmakers in the 
		1930's to imagine the internet as  
		it operates today. 
		 
		So instead of following the law, the FCC is trying  
		to "fake" its way 
		into false authority over the  
		internet by claiming authority in the 
		current "net  
		neutrality" debate. By asserting its authority with  
		net 
		neutrality, the FCC will establish a beachhead 
 of implied authority from 
		which it can begin to 
 control and censor the internet. 
		 
		This is why "net neutrality" is a threat to internet  
		freedom. It's not 
		because of anything to do with  
		net neutrality itself, but rather with 
		the FCC's big  
		power grab in its assertion that it has authority 
 over 
		websites just like it has authority over  
		broadcast radio. 
		 
		The FCC may soon tell you what you can post on 
 the internet 
		 
		Where is this all heading? Once the FCC 
 establishes a foothold on the 
		'net, it can then 
 assert that it has the power to tell you what to  
		post 
		on the internet. Here's how it might unfold: 
		 
		First, the FCC will simply ban what it calls  
		"information traitors," 
		which will include people  
		like Julian Assange (Wikileaks) who publish 
		state 
 secrets. (Technically Julian Assange can't be a  
		traitor since he's 
		not even American in the first  
		place, but don't expect the FCC to care 
		about this 
 distinction.) 
		 
		Once the public is comfortable with that, the FCC  
		will advance its 
		agenda to include "information  
		terrorists" which will include anything 
		posted about 
 Ron Paul, the federal reserve and the counterfeit  
		money 
		supply, G. Edward Griffin, or anything from 
 true U.S. patriots who 
		defend the Constitution. The 
 anti-state website www.LewRockwell.com 
		(where  
		some of my own articles have appeared from time 
 to time) would 
		also be immediately banned because 
 its information is so dangerous to 
		government  
		control. 
		 
		After that censorship is in place, the FCC will likely  
		begin to push the 
		corporate agenda by banning  
		websites that harm the profits of large 
		corporations. 
 This will include, of course, websites like 
		 
		NaturalNews.com which teach people about health 
 freedom, nutritional 
		cures, natural remedies and  
		alternatives to Big Pharma's high-profit 
 pharmaceuticals.  
		 
		The way this will come about is that the FCC may  
		require a license to 
		publish health information on the 
 web, in much the same way that states 
		currently 
 license doctors to practice medicine. This is how 
 conventional 
		medicine has operated its monopoly 
 for so long, by the way: By 
		controlling the licensing 
 of doctors at the state level. Any doctor who 
		dares  
		prescribe nutritional supplements or suggest that  
		medication might 
		be harmful to a patient  
		immediately gets stripped of his license to 
		practice 
 medicine (and thereby put out of business). The  
		FCC will likely 
		do the same thing across the 
 internet. Sites that publish health 
		information 
 without a license will be deemed "a threat to 
 public health" 
		and be seized by the government. 
		 
		The first target? Anti-vaccine websites. Vaccines  
		are so crucial to the 
		continuation of disease and  
		medical enslavement in America that any site 
 questioning the current vaccine mythology will  
		be deemed a threat to 
		public health -- or perhaps 
 even a "terrorism" organization. 
		 
		Essentially, once the FCC has gained power and  
		authority over the 
		internet, it will use that power to  
		push a Big Government / Big Business 
		agenda that 
 censors the truth, keeps people trapped in a  
		system of 
		disinformation, and silences anyone  
		who challenges the status quo. 
		 
		The FCC is poised to become the FDA of internet 
		information, banning 
		alternative speech and 
 enforcing an information monopoly engineered by 
 powerful corporations. 
		 
		Think of the FCC as the new the Ministry of Truth  
		from George Orwell's 
		novel 1984  
		(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Truth). 
		 
		This is not about net neutrality, it's about the FCC  
		power grab 
		 
		Remember, I am not arguing here for or against the  
		principle of net 
		neutrality itself, but rather warning  
		about the FCC's imposition of 
		false authority over 
 the internet in the first place. The idea of net 
		 
		neutrality has merits, but granting the FCC the power 
 to control the 
		internet is a disastrously bad idea that 
 will only end in censorship and 
		"information tyranny"  
		-- especially now that governments around the 
		world 
 are witnessing the "dangers" of information freedom 
 via the 
		Wikileaks fiasco. 
		 
		If there's one thing governments hate, it's real  
		freedom. Sure, they all 
		talk about freedom and  
		publicly claim their allegiance to it, but behind 
		the 
 scenes what they really want is total information  
		control. That's 
		because freedom gives people the 
 ability to say what they want, to 
		whomever they 
 want, and even to oppose the doctrine of the  
		government. 
		 
		Just look at China and how it has censored the  
		internet to the point 
		where you can't even log in to 
 Facebook from that country. 
		 
		Governments hate freedom because freedom  
		threatens centralized power and 
		control over the 
 People. And because governments hate freedom, 
 they also 
		hate the internet as long as it's free. This  
		is why bloggers and 
		internet journalists are right  
		now imprisoned all over the world for 
		merely 
 posting the truth  
		(http://www.cpj.org/imprisoned/cpjs-2008-census 
		-online-journalists-now-jailed-mor.php). 
		 
		As Noam Chomsky said in his DemocracyNow  
		interview (link above), what 
		the recent Wikileaks  
		releases really show is that the U.S. government 
 has "a profound hatred for democracy." 
		 
		It also happens to have a profound hatred for 
 actual freedom, because 
		people who are free to  
		think for themselves and write whatever they want 
 are always going to be a threat to a government  
		that wants people to 
		conform, obey and acquiesce. 
		 
		All government agencies seek to expand their  
		power 
		What do the FCC, FDA, TSA, DEA, FTC and USDA 
 all have in common? 
		 
		They all want more power. They want more  
		authority, bigger budgets and 
		more control over  
		the world around them. They are like cancer tumors, 
 growing in size and toxicity while they consume 
 more and more by 
		stealing resources from a  
		healthy host. The bigger these cancer tumors 
 become, the more dangerous they become to the 
 health of the host body, 
		and the more urgently they  
		need to be held in check or excised from the 
		body 
 entirely. 
		 
		There is no such thing as a government agency that  
		wants to be smaller, 
		with shrinking budgets and fewer 
 employees on the taxpayer payroll. 
		Government  
		departments -- just like people -- incessantly  
		seek more 
		power even at the expense of freedom 
 among those they claim to serve. 
		And this move by 
 the FCC to assume control over the internet is one  
		of 
		the most dangerous power grabs yet witnessed  
		in the short history of the 
		information age. 
		 
		CLIP
		 
		 
		http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/avenging- 
		wikileaks-anonymous-hackers-takes-mastercard-site/ 
		 
		"ALL-OUT CYBER WAR" ERUPTS OVER WIKILEAKS!  
		/ 'ANONYMOUS' HACKERS TAKE
		MASTERCARD,  
		VISA OFFLINE AFTER THEY TAKE WIKILEAKS  
		FINANCIALLY OFFLINE! 
		/ NOW CALLED BY MANY AS THE "WORLD's FIRST  
		INFO WAR!" OPERATED BY A 
		GLOBAL CONSORTIUM OF HACKERS KNOWN AS  
		"Operation PAYBACK!" – 
		By Stephen C. Webster, Raw Story, Thursday,  
		December 9, 2010, 12:47 a.m. 
		 
		THIRD UPDATE: 'Operation Payback' targets 
 Visa.com, site goes down in
		minutes!  
		 
		'Anonymous' hackers flexed their muscle again  
		Wednesday, orchestrating a
		successful denial of  
		service attack against Visa, the largest credit 
		card provider in the world. 
		 
		A Twitter account connected to the hackers  
		declared the start of theattacks and the site was  
		unavailable less than 16 minutes later. 
		 
		The attack was allegedly orchestrated as an act of  
		vengeance over Visa's
		decision to cut off  
		electronic donations to secrets outlet WikiLeaks. 
		 
		WikiLeaks said Wednesday that its payments 
 processor, Iceland-based
		DataCell, planned to 
 sue Visa and MasterCard for terminating  
		payments  to
		the site. 
		 
		SECOND UPDATE: Cables show Obama admin  
		lobbied Russia on behalf of
		MasterCard, Visa 
		 
		UPDATE: MasterCard confirms service  
		interruption for cardholders
		MasterCard  
		Worldwide confirmed on Wednesday morning 
 that the "MasterCard
		Directory Server" had gone 
 down and that cardholders were experiencing 
		service interruptions.  
		 
		The revelation was made as a massive denial of 
 service attack was staged
		against MasterCard,  
		ostensibly for refusing further payments to secrets 
		outlet WikiLeaks. 
		 
		"Please be advised that MasterCard SecureCode  
		Support has detected a
		service disruption to the 
 MasterCard Directory Server," MasterCard said. 
		"The Directory Server service has been failed over 
 to a secondary site
		however customers may still 
 be experiencing intermittent connectivity
		issues.  
		 
		More information on the estimated time of recovery  
		will be shared in due
		course." MasterCard 
 transactions appeared to be proceeding as normal 
		later in the day. 
		 
		An earlier report follows ... 
		 
		Sites for Visa, PayPal, Sen. Lieberman also  
		targeted.... 
		 
		Yesterday, MasterCard Worldwide became the  
		latest financial institution
		to face the wrath of  
		online hackers acting to avenge secrets outlet 
		WikiLeaks over the credit card provider's  
		declaration that the site was
		engaged in "illegal" 
 activities. 
		 
		Not 36 hours after MasterCard froze payments  
		to WikiLeaks, their Web
		site was down as hackers 
 with the group "Anonymous" launched a new  
		wave
		of cyberattacks.  
		 
		The company said its customers could still use 
 their credit cards for
		purchases, but the PayPoint 
 retail network told a BBC reporter that 
 MasterCard's "SecureCode" service had been 
 taken down, interrupting
		service all over. 
		 
		The hackers also claimed responsibility for  
		taking down the Web site for
		Swiss bank 
 PostFinance, after it froze an account with over 
 $31,000 set
		aside for site founder Julian Assange's  
		legal defense. Assange wasarrested in London  
		yesterday on an Interpol warrant out of Sweden, 
 wherehe's wanted for questioning in an  
		investigation of sexual
		assault. 
		 
		"Anonymous" has dubbed their cyber warfare 
 campaign "Operation Payback,"
		threatening to  
		"fire" on any entity that attempts to censor   
		WikiLeaks.Service to mastercard.com was  
		unavailable at time of this writing. TheWeb site  
		for the Swedish prosecutor's office was also offline, 
 as was asite for the lawyer representing Assange's  
		accusers. 
		 
		SECURE COMPUTING Magazine called what's  
		happening "an all-out cyber
		war," noting that  
		massive botnets were attacking each other by 
		mid-Wednesday morning as even the  
		'Anonymous' group had come under fire
		from  
		another group of hackers that sought to defend  
		U.S. interests.
		 
		 
		That group, which was successful in taking  
		WikiLeaks offline in late
		November, was also  
		thought to be behind attacks on the 'Anonymous' 
 Web
		site, anonops.net, which was still online at  
		time of this writing. 
		 
		A "botnet" is Internet slang for a massive shadow 
 network of computers
		that have been unknowingly 
 hijacked by malicious software. They are
		typically  
		used for nefarious purposes, such as distributed 
 denial of
		service attacks.  
		 
		Credit card processor Visa also suspended  
		payments to WikiLeaks on
		Tuesday morning, but 
 its website was functional at time of this story's 
		publication. It too was expected to come under  
		denial of service
		attacks. 
		 
		"Operation PAYBACK" also promised to attack  
		PayPal, the online payment
		service that last week 
 cut off WikiLeaks and froze over $60,000 in 
		electronic donations, but their site was still online 
 Wednesday morning. 
		 
		Topics trending on Twitter suggested an attack 
 may also target the
		micro-blogging site. 
		 
		Others to suffer downtime this week include  
		PayPal's blog, EveryDNS --
		the domain name  
		service provider that pulled WikiLeaks off it's .org 
		address -- and Sen. Joe Lieberman's (I-CT) .gov  
		Web site. Lieberman's
		staff was responsible for 
 prompting Amazon.com to take WikiLeaks off its 
		U.S.-based cloud servers. 
		 
		Researchers with Panda Security have been  
		tracking the wave of attacks, 
		blow-for-blow. 
		 
		In recent days, the online to-do over WikiLeaks 
 has been called the
		world's "first serious 
 infowar" and a "war for control of the Internet." 
		 
		"What is this all about? And what does it have  
		to do with censorship and
		Operation Payback?"  
		'Anonymous' asks on their Web site. 
		 
		"While we don't have much of an affiliation with 
 WikiLeaks, we fight for
		the same reasons. We  
		want transparency and we counter censorship.  
		The
		attempts to silence WikiLeaks are long strides 
 closer to a world where
		we can not say what we 
 think and are unable to express our opinions and 
		ideas. 
		 
		"We can NOT let this happen. This is why our  
		intention is to find out
		who is responsible for this 
 failed attempt at censorship. This is why we 
		intend to utilize our resources to raise awareness,  
		attack those against
		and support those who are 
 helping lead our world to freedom and 
		democracy." 
		 
		Raw Story will continue following the latest  
		developments. 
		------------------------------------------ 
		RELATED LINK ON YOUTUBE: 
		OPERATION PAYBACK: ANONYMOUS MESSAGE  
		ABOUT ACTA LAWS, INTERNET 
		CENSORSHIP and COPYRIGHT!  
		 
		Watch video here: 
		 
		http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZNDV4hGUGw 
		 
		"Operation PAYBACK" (is a bitch), this is the  
		Internet, we run this. An
		open message from  
		Anonymous to the governments of the world and 
 their
		legal leeches regarding the motivation of the  
		cyber protests. 
		 
		Corrupt governments of the world, we are  
		anonymous. For some time now,
		voices have been 
 crying out in unison against the new ACTA laws.  
		The
		gross inadequacies of the new laws being  
		passed internationally have
		been pointed out  
		repeatedly. Our chief complaint is that such 
 measures
		would restrict people's access to the  
		internet. 
		 
		In these modern times access to the internet is  
		fast becoming a basichuman right. Just like any  
		other basic human right, we believe that it is wrong 
		to infringe upon it. To threaten to cut people off  
		from the
		global consciousness as you have is  
		criminal and abhorrent. To move to
		censor content 
 on the internet based on your own prejudice is at best 
		laughably impossible, at worst, morally reprehensible. 
		 
		The unjust restrictions you impose on us will meet 
 with disaster and
		only strengthen our resolve to  
		disobey and rebel against your tyranny.
		Such actions 
 taken against you, and those you out source your 
 malignant 
		litigation too, are inevitable, unavoidable and  
		unstoppable. 
		 
		We Are ANONYMOUS,  
		 
		We Are Legion And Divided By ZERO. 
		 
		We Do NOT Forgive Internet Censorship 
		 
		And We Do NOT Forget Free Speech. 
		 
		We Are Over 9,000,  
		 
		Expect Us! 
		------------------------------------------ 
		Copyright © 2010 / The Raw Story
		
		 
		 
		SUBSCRIPTION TO  
		THE EARTH RAINBOW NETWORK E-LIST   
		 
		If you are not yet a subcriber to the 
 Earth Rainbow Network emailing 
		list  
		and would like to subscribe to its 
 automated listserver and 
		regularly  
		receive similar compilations covering  
		a broad range of 
		subjects, including  
		each new Meditation Focus issued on 
 a regular basis, 
		simply send a blank 
 email at
		
		earthrainbownetwork- 
		
		subscribe@lists.riseup.net from the 
 email 
		account to which you want to 
 receive the material compiled and  
		networked 
		by the Earth Rainbow  
		Network Coordinator. Subscription 
 is FREE!  
		
		
	
		
		Subject: INTERNET DOMAIN SEIZURE OUTRAGE! 
		 
		Neo-Fascist U.S. Government 
		    
 Seizes BitTorrent Search Engine Domain and  
		Tons More in The
		    Continuing Rise of The  
		AMERIKAN 4th REICH! 
		 
		 
		http://torrentfreak.com/u-s-government-seizes 
		-bittorrent-search-engine-domain-and-more-101126/ 
		 
		NOTE: Scroll DOWN to END to view two (2)  
		supporting IMAGES! 
		 
		INTERNET DOMAIN SEIZURE OUTRAGE! /  
		NEO-FASCIST U.S. GOVERNMENT SEIZES 
		BitTorrent SEARCH ENGINE and TONS MORE IN  
		THE CONTINUING RISE
		OF THE AMERIKAN 4th  
		REICH ALL DONE IN THE NAME OF "NATIONAL  
		SECURITY!" - 
		Written by Enigmax on Saturday,  
		November 27, 2010 
		 
		Following on the heels of this week’s domain 
 seizure of a large hiphopfile-sharing links forum, 
 it’s clear today that the U.S. Government has 
		been very busy. Without any need for COICA,  
		ICE has just seized the 
		domain
		of a BitTorrent  
		meta-search engine along with those belonging  
		to other 
		music
		linking sites and several others  
		which appear to be connected to 
		physical 
		counterfeit goods. 
		 
		While complex, it’s still possible for U.S. 
 authorities and copyright 
		groups
		to point at a 
 fully-fledged BitTorrent site with a tracker and 
 say 
		“that’s aninfringing site.” When one looks 
 at a site which hosts torrents but 
		operates 
		no tracker, the finger pointing becomes quite  
		a bit more difficult. 
		 
		When a site has no tracker, carries no torrents, 
 lists no copyright 
		worksunless someone  
		searches for them and responds just like  
		Google, accusingit of infringement becomes 
 somewhat of a minefield – unless you’re ICE 
		HOMELAND SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS that is. 
		 
		This morning, visitors to the Torrent-Finder.com  
		site are greeted with
		an ominous graphic which  
		indicates that ICE have seized the site’s 
		domain. 
		The message below is posted on the seized sites 
		 
		SEIZED SERVERS 
		 
		“My domain has been seized without any  
		previous complaint or notice from 
		any 
		court!” the exasperated owner of Torrent- 
		Finder told TorrentFreak this 
		morning. 
		 
		“I firstly had DNS downtime. While I was  
		contacting GoDaddy I noticed 
		the DNS 
		had changed. Godaddy had no idea what was 
 going on and until now they do 
		not 
		understand the situation and they say it was  
		totally from ICANN,” he 
		explained. 
		 
		Aside from the fact that domains are being  
		seized seemingly at will, 
		there is
		a very  
		serious problem with the action against  
		Torrent-Finder. Not only 
		does
		the site not 
 host or even link to any torrents whatsoever,  
		it actually 
		onlyreturns searches through 
 embedded iframes which display other sites  
		that 
		arenot under the control of the Torrent- 
		Finder owner. 
		 
		Torrent-Finder remains operational through 
		another URL, 
		Torrent-Finder.info,so feel free 
 to check it out for yourself. The layouts of the 
 sites it 
		searches
		are clearly visible in the  
		results shown. 
		 
		Yesterday we reported that the domain of 
 hiphop site RapGodFathers had 
		been seized 
		and today we can reveal that they are not on their 
 own. Two other 
		music
		sites in the same field –  
		OnSmash.com and DaJaz1.com – have fallen to 
		 
		the same
		fate. But ICE activities don’t end there. 
		 
		Several other domains also appear to have been  
		seized including 
		 
		2009jerseys.com, 
 nfljerseysupply.com,  
		throwbackguy.com,  
		cartoon77.com, 
		 
		lifetimereplicas.com, 
		handbag9.com,  
		handbagcom.com 
		dvdprostore.com. 
		 
		All seized sites point to the same message. 
		 
		Domain seizures coming under the much  
		debated ‘censorship bill’ COICA? 
		Who needs it? 
		 
		FLASH UPDATE: Below is an longer list of 
 domains that were apparently 
		seized. Most of the sites relate to 
 counterfeit goods. We assume that 
		the authorities had a proper warrant for 
 these sites (as they had for 
		RapGodFathers yesterday), but were 
 unable to confirm this. 
		 
		2009jerseys.com 
		51607.com 
		amoyhy.com 
		b2corder.com 
		bishoe.com 
		borntrade.com 
		borntrade.net 
		boxedtvseries.com 
		boxset4less.com 
		boxsetseries.com 
		burberryoutletshop.com 
		cartoon77.com 
		cheapscarfshop.com 
		coachoutletfactory.com 
		dajaz1.com 
		discountscarvesonsale.com 
		dvdcollectionsale.com 
		dvdcollects.com 
		dvdorderonline.com 
		dvdprostore.com 
		dvdscollection.com 
		dvdsetcollection.com 
		dvdsetsonline.com 
		dvdsuperdeal.com 
		eluxury-outlet.com 
		getdvdset.com 
		gofactoryoutlet.com 
		golfstaring.com 
		golfwholesale18.com 
		handbag9.com 
		handbagcom.com 
		handbagspop.com 
		icqshoes.com 
		ipodnanouk.com 
		jersey-china.com 
		jerseyclubhouse.com 
		jordansbox.com 
		lifetimereplicas.com 
		louis-vuitton-outlet-store.com 
		lv-outlets.com 
		lv-outlets.net 
		lv-outletstore.com 
		massnike.com 
		merrytimberland.com 
		mycollects.com 
		mydreamwatches.com 
		mygolfwholesale.com 
		newstylerolex.com 
		nfljerseysupply.com 
		nibdvd.com 
		odvdo.com 
		oebags.com 
		onsmash.com 
		overbestmall.com 
		rapgodfathers.com 
		realtimberland.com 
		rmx4u.com 
		scarfonlineshop.com 
		scarfviponsale.com 
		shawls-store.com 
		silkscarf-shop.com 
		silkscarfonsale.com 
		skyergolf.com 
		sohob2b.com 
		sohob2c.com 
		storeofeast.com 
		stuff-trade.com 
		sunglasses-mall.com 
		sunogolf.com 
		tbl-sports.com 
		throwbackguy.com 
		tiesonsale.com 
		timberlandlike.com 
		topabuy.com 
		torrent-finder.com 
		usaburberryscarf.com 
		usaoutlets.net 
		  
		EDITORS LAST NOTE:  WERE YOU AWARE THAT 
		OSWALD WAS CONSIDERED A HERO BEFORE HE 
 WAS CALLED A PATSY AFTER 
		KENNEDY'S  
		ASSASSINATION IN 1963?  IF NOT YOU ARE  
		BEHIND THE TIMES!  
		WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN 
 TOLD THAT A LONG TIME AGO. 
		
		
		KENNEDY DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
		
		
		POLITICS DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
		
		
		DEMOCRAT DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
		
		
		REPUBLICAN DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
		
		
		SATANINSM DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
		
		
		REPTILIAN DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
		
		
		FREEDOM DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
		
		
		JEAN HUDON DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
		
		
		CONSPIRACY DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
		  
		DREAMS OF 
		THE GREAT EARTHCHANGES -  
		MAIN INDEX 
		
		 
		 | 
	
1 comments:
Very, very nicely done.
Intentionally nor not, Superintendent Hatrick's decision places an explicit
value judgment on different family lives in a school system dedicated to
education of all, equally. It says, in effect, that some are more equal than
others.
There are those who will argue that the book's absence represents the
absence of a moral viewpoint, a viewpoint which is the parents' role to
provide, and is therefore a position of neutrality. They couldn't be
further from the truth. There is nothing neutral about erasing and
silencing people. The act of not talking about sexual minorities is itself
a moral judgment.
Parents in Lexington, Mass. have taken this approach one step further,
not only demanding that their children be shielded from seeing certain
books, but that they also be isolated from any circumstance in which
another child might talk about her own family if she has two dads or
two moms.
Tango is a happy story, as is any story where an orphaned child finds a
loving family - it hardly represents an "unfortunate fact" by any objec
tive standard. But even those parents who see it that way are in no way,
shape or form restricted from teaching their own children what they
think about it, nor should they be. They are completely free to tell their
child that "there are sometimes two men who raise children together
like Roy and Silo, but that it's unnatural and they're going to hell" if
that's what they want to do.
I think that what those parents are ultimately afraid of is that their
children will end up disagreeing with them.
There is another suspicious/peculiar aspect to the way this was
handled, and that is the decision to apply the restriction to all the
schools rather than just the one where the complaint was submitted
Normally, there would have to be a separate challenge and review
process at each school. We need to find out why that didn't happen.
There are links to other resources, including the written policy
governing book challenges, at Equality Loudoun's post.
http://www.leesburgtomorrow.us/2008/02/censorship-of-truth.html