map of biospheres in US

Dee Finney's blog

start date July 20, 2011

today's date April 27, 2014

page 572




“Feds Grant Eminent Domain as Collateral to China for U.S. Debts.”

by Bernadine Smith


This is written in response to criticisms regarding the article on eminent domain being circulated, entitled: "Feds Grant Eminent Domain as Collateral to China for U.S. Debts."  Whether it is based on information gained or not, the circumstances tie into facts that need to be taken into consideration, and it most likely characterizes reality.  In the least it could be a warning of circumstances which need to be taken into consideration.  The thoughts it evokes is something dreadful, but these possibilities have to be dealt with!   Let's examine the similarity to the facts:

Things have changed ever since the socialists took over the oval office!  Take for instance, our policy of eminent domain.   The traditional policy in this country used to be that public officials working in government could take control of land held by a private person, and exercise "eminent domain" over such property, provided such action met with certain justified constitutional requirements and public approval.   At least, that was the way it started out -- an essential safety benefit and protection of the public.  Then in 2005 the Kelo Decision came before the Supreme Court.  The Court's decision was that land could be taken from one private owner and given to another private owner, simply on the basis that the new owner would generate more tax revenue.   That unbelievable and unfortunate court decision damaged the original intent of the Bill of Rights affecting man's sovereignty, his sovereign right to own land, and his right to receive due process.

I recall that while Bill Clinton was president he had some plan going with the Chinese government to start about 8 new Chinese communities in 8 different U.S. states. The idea at that time was to bring in communist Chinese, and their families, into 8 different states to set up new communities.  There was opposition, and as far as I know, the idea is not active, as far as I know.  As I recall, most of the 8 communities, but not all, were designated to be scattered in states comprising the lower half of the U.S.  If that idea ever becomes revived, it will have big help from the Kelo Decision and a lot of condemnation proceedings will be practiced to provide adequate space for these Chinese communities.

Would China be satisfied to get the power of eminent domain as collateral for the new huge loan Sec. of State Hillary Clinton just managed to negotiate?  Hillary was over there. Two public officials were on television a few nights ago, and one of them described Hillary "on her bended knee, begging China to give us another loan".  China had been unwilling to take on any more of our debts.  The only backing we have for our money is the words "full faith and credit".  If we collapse because of the poor management and continual over-spending and inflation of this country's money, where is China's security for their loan?  What collateral did she come up with?   There has to be some worthwhile collateral for these massive loans being expended to us from a shrewd country, especially on top of what we already owe them. Is it possible that the federal government has already had to put up land as collateral for previous debts?  What else do we have to put up as collateral?  We have no gold.  The federal government holds 50% of the nation's land, which could be listed as collateral.   We need to ask "WHAT IS the collateral if we should be unable to pay this debt?  The Chinese read the paper and watch TV.  They understand our stock market.   The situation begs the question: "How much of our physical assets has been used as collateral?"  In the least, we should be knowing exactly what the collateral is!  If our money is destroyed by more inflation, or if we go bankrupt, surely the Chinese government is not expecting to recoup their money in payments of "interest due figures", or wallpaper money.   We realize that much of our land has already been consigned, turned over to the United Nations:  Rivers, national parks, wetlands, Biosphere reserves, Heritages such as Yellowstone National Park, Grand Canyon, Independence Hall, etc., and dozens of other national treasures.  Do we have enough other federal land and sites left to cover for all we are borrowing and spending hand over fist? Or will these huge loans also depend upon our privately owned land?

If you wonder whether it would be possible for privately owned land to be collateralized, remember back a few years ago when the National Association of Realtors' president (Julio S. Laguarta at the time, and pictured in the article) warned in his speech to the International Real Estate Federation in Toronto, Canada that "Failure to change an official United Nations policy that explicitly opposes the right of private property ownership will ultimately result in the destruction of our industry."  Mr. Laguarta then criticized the United Nation's position on "no private ownership of land" as he warned of and quoted the U.N.'s position as follows:  


     "Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market.  Social justice, urban renewal, and development, the provision of decent dwellings and health conditions for people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole.

Persons running the upcoming administrations under the "CHANGE" POLICY may be forced to honor the no private ownership of land policy!  Our government as a member of the U.N. has already had to adopt such a policy, even though we are not told about it. This land policy has never been known to have been rescinded.  If there is not enough federal land left to pay off the Federal Reserve, plus all those countries to whom we are now indebted, and especially the gigantic debt we owe China,  our ruling socialist elite may try to pay off the debt by including our land (formerly privately owned) to satisfy the investors!   The money was borrowed in the name of the people of the United States and the money borrowed will have to come from the assets of the people.    It is called a "crash!"

These issues may seem to many people that they cannot happen, but the debt is there and it is real.   We are going to be responsible for it in one way or another.  We need to understand more of the provisions in these loans, and the consequences.  Too few people have no idea that we are not on the gold standard.  FDR took us off the gold standard many many years ago when he called all the gold in to pay other debts.  THERE IS NO GOLD behind our greenbacks!  If we go bankrupt, a different ball game with different rules will be played, especially now that the socialists have taken over our country, and have acquired such world power.  China needs land.  They are looking to gain it. 

Please take time to go over these attachments of which there are a number. Wayne Hage's article is one of the best and is a must read.  Plenty of "sources" listed in there.   I have added check marks on a few of the important facts on some of the papers. 

Note that "agencies" appears is some of the articles you are receiving.  "Agencies" are not responsible to the people!  They are outside of and beyond the people's authority - not beholden to any Constitutional restraint.  They are run by internationalists.  If collateralizing our debts by using our properties seems unreal, then please consider that our presidents don't always have our best interest at heart.  Ever since Pres. John Kennedy signed the General & Complete Disarmament Law the Congress keeps funding Kennedy's Public Law 87-297, the law which divests us of our total U.S. national armed forces and transfers them to the United Nations on a permanent basis. We will have no military!  The same law also forbids all law-abiding citizens from owning or having access to a firearm of any kind.

When he was president, George W. Bush instituted a military government under the name Homeland Security "Agency".  The H.S.A. has merged the military with the civilian law enforcement systems, something never done in a republic, if it is to remain a republic. This altered concept of operation changes the United States from a republic into a dictatorship.  Obama is operating under Presidential Directive Decision 51 (P.D.D. 51) which empowers the president to be a dictator, and supersede the power of the Congress.  These are all just facts. What makes anyone think that we don't have to examine what is happening, especially when government leaders want to eliminate the Constitution and replace it with an already prepared world government constitution.  Hopefully, this article "Feds Grant Eminent Domain as Collateral to China for U.S. Debts." will bring people out of their lethargy.      


God bless America!  



Your Land: Collateral for the National Debt

Submitted by truth supporter on Sun, 01/04/2009 - 21:05


Ninety percent of the group consisted of conservationists, ecologists, government and United Nations bureaucrats. The other ten percent were world banking heavyweights, such as David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan Bank, London banker Edmund de Rothschild and the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, James Baker, who gave the keynote address.

During the first three days, the group was told that the WILDERNESS CONGRESS was about beating the ozone deterioration and bringing the rain forests back. The following days were closed to the public. With only the bankers in attendance, the topics discussed centered on the creation of a "WORLD CONSERVATION BANK" with collateral being derived from receipt of wilderness properties throughout the world. This bank would have central bank powers similar to the Federal Reserve. It would create currency and loans and engage in international discounting, counter-trade, barter and swap actions. Rothschild personally conducted the monetary matters and the creation of this WORLD CONSERVATION BANK. This bank would refinance by swapping debt for assets. A country with a huge national debt would receive money to pay off the debt by swapping the debt for wilderness lands. The plan was to swap one trillion dollars of Third World Debt into this new bank. In the long term, when the countries won't be able to pay off the loans, governments from around the world will give title to their wilderness lands to the bankers.

I consider Wayne Hage one of the most intelligent men I ever met. On our very first visit he was explaining the World Bank, the International Monetary fund and how the world bankers planned on collateralizing the world debt with land. Not just the U.S. national debt, but also the "WORLD" debt. A listener sent me a copy of a report of the FOURTH WORLD WILDERNESS CONGRESS, which was held in Denver in 1987. Over 1500 people from sixty countries were told that wilderness lands were to protect the reindeer, the spotted owl and other endangered species. Ninety percent of the group consisted of conservationists, ecologists, government and United Nations bureaucrats. The other ten percent were world banking heavyweights, such as David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan Bank, London banker Edmund de Rothschild and the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, James Baker, who gave the keynote address. George W. Hunt, an investment councilor, served as official host and sat in on all the meetings. It was George Hunt that wrote the report from which I have gleaned much of my information.

During the first three days, the group was told that the WILDERNESS CONGRESS was about beating the ozone deterioration and bringing the rain forests back. The following days were closed to the public. With only the bankers in attendance.

the topics discussed centered on the creation of a "WORLD CONSERVATION BANK" with collateral being derived from receipt of wilderness properties throughout the world. This bank would have central bank powers similar to the Federal Reserve. It would create currency and loans and engage in international discounting, counter-trade, barter and swap actions. Rothschild personally conducted the monetary matters and the creation of this WORLD CONSERVATION BANK. This bank would refinance by swapping debt for assets. A country with a huge national debt would receive money to pay off the debt by swapping the debt for wilderness lands. The plan was to swap one trillion dollars of Third World Debt into this new bank. In the long term, when the countries won't be able to pay off the loans, governments from around the world will give title to their wilderness lands to the bankers.

George Hunt wrote: "Title to the lands will go to the World Wilderness Land Inventory Trust. This Trust will float into the World Conservation Bank by the unanimous decree of the world's people, saying, God bless you for saving our reindeer. Those people at the congress were ignorant. They don't suspect anything. They're very naive. Not stupid, ignorant. I'm talking about the 90% that were not the world banking heavyweights."

Hunt goes on to say that World Bank loans, as they stand now, are not collateralized. They're saying, we want collateral, so when we loan-swap this debt, we're going to own the Amazon if you default. They're going to make their bad loans good by collateralizing them after the fact with all of this land and somebody is going to end up with title to twelve and half billion acres. They have multi-trillions of dollars upon which they can create currencies and loans and they're going to begin to barter and counter-trade and loan-swap against the United States. The World Conservation Bank is a scheme to monetize land. This will function as a world central bank and out of that bank there will grow a one-world fiat currency.

This isn't some scheme conjured up during the Bush and Clinton administrations. The United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development was created in 1982. The commission published the "BRUNDTLAND REPORT," setting the stage for unlimited enactments to take over ecology, and environmental and pollution laws throughout the world. The report stated: "We will have a proposal for very harsh, quasi-spiritual ecological laws for MOTHER EARTH. A MOTHER EARTH COMES FIRST mentality will arise throughout the world."

When James Baker made his keynote speech in 1987, he stated that, "No longer will the World Bank carry this debt unsecured. The only assets we have to collateralize are federal lands and national parks." Baker's definition of federal lands includes Heritage sites, of which there are about 20 in the United States. I say "about" 20, because they are being added on a regular basis. As I write this article, Congress is about to vote on a proposed Rim of the Valley National Park that would include over 500,000 acres of National Forest land and 170,000 parcels of private property including many farms and ranches. At the same time there is a bill before Congress called the Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act that would increase the acreage of designated wilderness by 50% in the lower 48 states. *** While our Heritage sites take in quite a large amount of territory, such as Yellowstone National Park and Mesa Verde, the Grand Canyon and the Everglades, other countries have much greater areas. Brazil for example has the Amazon Conservation Complex and Canada has the Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks. As I write this story, the list includes 851 properties in 141 countries, comprising over one third of the earth's land mass. Will all this land collateralize the world's debt? Probably not, so along comes NAIS (the National Animal Identification System).

According to the United States Department of Agriculture, "The first step in implementing a national animal identification system (NAIS) is identifying 

and registering premises that are associated with the animal agriculture industry. In terms of the NAIS, a premise is any geographically unique location in which agricultural animals are raised, held, or boarded. Under this definition, farms, ranches, feed-yards, auction barns and livestock exhibitions and fair sites are all examples of premises." That may be the definition some government bureaucrat will give you, but the word "premises" under the "international Criminal Court Act 2002- Sect 4, states: The word "premises" includes a place and a "conveyance." Why check with the International Criminal Court Act? Because on June 8, 2007, Under-Secretary of Agriculture Bruce Knight, speaking at the World Pork Expo in Des Moines, Iowa, is quoted as saying, "We have to live by the same international rules we're expecting other people to do."

Throughout the entire Draft National Animal Identification System Users Guide, land is referred to as a premises and not property. A "Premises" has no protection under the Constitution of the United States, while property always has the exclusive rights of the owner tied to it. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution protect property rights.

The word "Premise" is a synonym for the word tenement. A definition of the word tenement in law is: Property, such as land, held by one person "leasing" it to another. Webster's New World Dictionary 1960 College Edition defines "Premises" as the part of a deed or "lease" that states its reason, the parties involved and the property in "conveyance." Webster then defines "conveyance" as the transfer of ownership of real property from one person to another. It is quite obvious that the bureaucrats in Washington had a very good reason to use the term "premises" and never mention "PROPERTY."

Let's take another look at the wilderness areas and the World Bank's plans to collateralize its loans. While the wilderness areas cover about one third of the earth's surface, they are wilderness areas for a good reason they were useless or difficult to homestead, farm or use in a constructive manner. Worldwide, the best and more valuable land is occupied by farmers, ranchers and people with the ambition to produce. Wouldn't the World Bankers rather have some productive property besides mountains, deserts and swamps?

I am convinced that the word "premise" will put an encumbrance on your deed. The bankers say they want to monetize land. It's your land and my land they want to monetize.

The bankers are in the process of accumulating the wealth of the world. Very few privately owned assets can be termed "real wealth." According to scripture, God made Abraham very wealthy, giving him LAND, CATTLE, silver and gold. (Genesis 24:35) Four thousand years later, wealth continues to be LAND, CATTLE, silver and gold. I don't know where the world deposits of silver and gold are stored, but I'm sure the bankers have them in their control. That only leaves LAND and CATTLE, which I believe could be next on the list. Genesis 47 describes how Joseph had storehouses full of grain to feed the people, but he didn't have a welfare program. During the first year of the famine, Joseph took "ALL THE MONEY" the people had for only one year's supply of grain. The second year he took all their cattle for another year's supply of grain. The next year they said, "We have nothing left but our bodies and our land. Buy us and our land in exchange for food and we and our land will be servants to Pharaoh." Genesis 47:21 states, "And as for the people, he removed them to the cities and made slaves of them."

James Madison made a statement concerning how our people could lose our freedom by gradual and silent encroachment by those in power. Is it possible that those in power today are gradually and silently in the process of removing the people to the cities to make slaves of them? Federalizing our land and our cattle would certainly be a step in that direction.



Yes, believe it. The U.S. debt is over $14 trillion, and is the sum of all outstanding debt owed by the Federal Government. Nearly two-thirds is the public debt, which is owed to the people, businesses and foreign governments who bought Treasury bills, notes, and bonds ( A country's external debt is part of the total debt of a country that is owed to foreign creditors. These creditors may include other banks, governments, corporations, and private individuals. For the purposes of this post, I will use China as my example since it is the largest external debt holder.

Some may argue that this debt is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. What does this mean? It means, in very insidious terms, the ability of the United States Government to infinitely tax the hell out of American citizens to pay back debts. But, if the system fails (i.e., government default, bankruptcy of the country, and other similar SHTF events) and that taxpayer base no longer exists, that debt still needs to be satisfied; as of October 2010, the major foreign holder of treasury securities is China with 906.8 billion dollars. Second is Japan with 877.4 billion dollars, and third is UK with 477.6 billion. It is noteworthy to mention that oil exporters are fourth with 213.9 billion dollars (

While a little over 900 billion dollars is only a fraction of our debt, it is still significant, especially since we continue to borrow more and more from China. In 2009, Speaking at his annual press conference at the close of China's parliament, Chinese premier Wen Jiabao said: "We have made a huge amount of loans to the United States. Of course we are concerned about the safety of our assets. To be honest, I'm a little bit worried." He called on Washington "to honor its words, stay a credible nation and ensure the safety of Chinese assets" ( 

Let me explain what the premier of China means. In the United States, external federal debt has been collateralized with our national lands, though the vast majority of the population is unaware of this ( Yes, I know that this article is from 2008, but stay with me. It all started in the Johnson administration when we allowed foreign investors to buy part of our debt. During these years, beginning in 1964, more and more of our land was set aside in various categories, such as wilderness and endangered species. Since all original wealth is derived from the land, what it boils down to is that the natural resources of this nation are being used as a collateral base for our national debt (

In an article by former Congresswoman Helen Chenoweth-Hage, she elaborates on the United Nations involvement in the land grab: 

One insidious program that has been eating away at our private property, as well as at our sovereignty as a nation, has come from the United Nations. It is called the "American Heritage Sites" and the "Man and Biosphere Reserves Sites." As a freshman in Congress, I went one day to visit Independence Hall in Philadelphia in order to see the Liberty Bell. I discovered that the Liberty Bell is now incased in a building that was built by the National Park Service. As I stood in line waiting to go in, I noticed two plaques in the brick walkways, one of which commemorated the site where John Kennedy stood when he gave a
speech for a certain occasion, a great tribute to a great patriot. I then went over to the second plaque, which commemorated the dedication of this site to
 the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO. I was stunned––Independence Hall was under the jurisdiction of UNESCO!

Realizing UNESCO uses one of two designations when targeting a site for its control–– (1) Rural Heritage Sites, and (2) Biosphere Reserves––my staff and I did some research. We discovered that exactly forty-seven sites in America have been designated under the Man and Biosphere Reserve, and twenty sites have been designated as Rural Heritage sites––all under the jurisdiction of UNESCO. Among the sites designated as Biosphere Reserves are the Coast Ranges in California, Cascade Head in Oregon, the Central Gulf Coastal Plain in Florida, the Central Plains in Colorado, the Adirondacks in New York and Vermont, the Everglades in Florida, the New Jersey Pine lands, the Rocky Mountains in Colorado, the Three Sisters in Oregon, and Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming and Montana––and those are just a few examples of the stretch of the Biosphere Reserves. Among the twenty World Heritage Sites are the Carlsbad Caverns National Park, the Grand Canyon National Park, the great Smokey Mountains in Tennessee and North Carolina, the Hawaiian Volcanoes National Park, Independence Hall in Pennsylvania, the Liberty Bell, the Olympic National Park, the Statue of Liberty in New York, Yellowstone National Park, and Yosemite National Park––that is, our national heritage and national treasures. After some studies, we found that all the land that has been taken––land given away by the government and currently under UN jurisdiction––would fill up the entire state of Colorado. Hundreds of thousands of American lives have been laid down, have been sacrificed to protect the sovereignty and land of our nation, and then our government just turns around and gives our land away; its jurisdiction has been handed over to others. This was too much ( 

What happens when The United States government refuses to pay up? Do you really think that we can continue borrowing based on full faith and credit? I cannot imagine China would buy more paper without some sort of collateral. As much as I dislike him, Glenn Beck had an interesting take on this issue at

Look at some other countries that have defaulted or went bankrupt. Ireland, Iceland, and Greece

These types of events can happen to the United States if we go bankrupt. Don’t think for a moment that the IMF, World Bank, and a consortium of other nations couldn’t get together and pull the same shit on America. There has never been a country in history that was too big to fail. While I don’t know the eventual outcomes, I can predict possible outcomes based on what information I have. The only way for the United States to financially save itself is to stop spending what we don’t have. For those reading, as much as you might want to dismiss this as a case of overly wrapped tinfoil, ask yourself this question: Do you believe that the United States government truthfully cares about the rights and freedoms of all American citizens? If you do, I’m sorry you wasted your time reading this article. 

Biosphere Reserves:

- See more at:


Catastrophic National Disaster Imminent? Why Has the United Nations Purchased Every State Park…

In the last few years, the United Nations has purchased all the state parks in the United States of America, and now they are working on buying all major U.S. cities. But why? What is the bigger picture? What is coming to America? The United Nations…


    • National Policy Analysis #341: 1972 Treaty Grants the United

      1972 Treaty Grants the United Nations Control Over American Historical Landmarks  treaty, the United States is allowing the United Nations and its member countries  under U.N.mandate.1 Since 1972, 68 percent of all U.S. national parks








      Dec 21, 2005 ... AWAKEN THE SLEEPING GIANT. From. Philip Burley. An Invitation. To Join in National Prayer ...if my people, who are called by my name, will ...

      • prophecy of new york city nuclear bomb terrorist attack - Similarto prophecy of new york city nuclear bomb terrorist attack

        This return was prophesied for 1998, and so far I haven't seen anyone else who can make a case even remotely as strong as my own. In addition, when ...

      • End Times Prophecy at Fatima - Dreams of the Great Earth Changes - Similarto End Times Prophecy at Fatima - Dreams of the Great Earth Changes

        The Bible prophesies that there will be a certain pattern of world politics that will characterize the end time geopolitical map. The focus will be the re-established ...


        REGULAR PROPHECY - PAGE 2. Subj: dreams/Manhattan. Date: 9/22/2001. From: genenevada@xxx. To: Dear DEE: I came accross you ...


        It has been prophesied John Paul II will be the last Pope before the end of time ( as we know it) or "transition" is another specific and spectacular promise made ...

      • The Pope's Visit to Temple Mount and the Third Secret of Fatima - Similarto The Pope's Visit to Temple Mount and the Third Secret of Fatima

        T.J. Germinario pointed out in his article, that the number 17, which is related to the "Pope" number 153, appeared in a prophesied event. The prophecy is in ...


        Jul 24, 2002 ... Mathew 7:24-27 - "Therefore whosoever hearest these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house

      • 45 Prophecies on the end of the millennium - on 1999-2000 - Similarto 45 Prophecies on the end of the millennium - on 1999-2000

        The text is divided in five parts, each part prophesying about a century of the last five of the millennium. Here is a text from the last part: "For stranger than the last ...


      Now the land grab for all races of people that came here to live and work for these 1% of the Crown British Empire. :( So crazy right? Blows your mind! Not even hidden information but so wild who would believe it! No one! Who would be so evil? Who would murder the people in False Flag Drills? What  kind of people employed as police would murder the people? So wild crazy stuff!






      Over the years, the United Nations has gradually purchased most of our precious National parks in the United States of America, and now they are working on buying all major U.S. cities. But why? What is the bigger picture?What is coming to America?


      As the Obama ‘Regime’ childishly uses our National Parks and Monuments as weapons against it’s own veterans, citizens, and especially to threaten the Tea Party, and it’s values (The Constitution),  few people are aware of the fact that we the people, United States citizens, do not control our own treasured landmarks. The United Nations (of which most member countries are our enemies) now controls most of our U.S. National Parks and Monuments including Yellowstone, the Everglades, the Washington Monument, the Statue of Liberty, Thomas Jefferson’s home at Monticello, the Brooklyn Bridge, Yosemite,and the Grand Canyon – to name just a few….while U.S. taxpayers still foot the bill.

      Jon Doughtery of WND said, “…if most Americans “knew what was going on (with their national parks), the uproar would be deafening.” Dougherty explains , “…(the U.N.) attempts to “globalize” huge portions of the United States — with taxpayers picking up the tab.” Agenda 21 is a United Nations document that was signed by Clinton and Bush that will allow the implementation of a one world government by gradually separating American citizens from their private property and “redistributing the wealth” globally. Globalists like Obama, Hilary, international bankers and George Soros are using many means to accomplish this including the implosion of the U.S. economy, the destruction of the U.S. family unit, and the ‘fake science’ of man-caused (anthropomorphic) global-warming/climate change’ endorsed (knowingly and unknowingly) by the environmentalist (earth worship) movement.

      “It is a well-documented fact that the U.N. is trying to gain control over vast amounts of U.S. territories to herd more people into cities where they are more manageable,” says Henry Lamb of Eco-Logic — a watchdog organization that monitors U.N. activities and U.S. sovereignty issues.  —Victoria



      The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization

      Please note: in the video, I mistakingly said “state parks”. I can’t get into my youtube to make a notation at this time. CORRECTION: It is NOT state parks; it is NATIONAL parks. Thank you!

      *Note: I have supplied links and quotes from ‘some’ older articles as a means of showing you evidence in regards to the subject matter of this news post. Thank you.

      In early February (2008), nine U.S. States began the process of re-asserting their sovereignty pursuant to the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the US Constitution; declaring null and void any actions by Congress that violated the Constitution. The states took action to make certain the feds couldn’t give away cities or the states themselves! This situation is going to get VERY ugly, VERY fast as one sovereign power (the feds) try to literally give away the land of other sovereign powers, (the states). This is the type of thing that starts Civil War. Our present federal government makes the treachery and betrayal of Benedict Arnold look like child’s play!  —