Introduction: Civil Action Number 76-H-667
Chapter 1: A National Emergency
Chapter 2: Implementing the New Government
Chapter 3: Controlling the Masses
Chapter 4: Plans for a Police State
Chapter 5: Preparing to Take Prisoners
Chapter 6: Mind Control -- Drugs and Propaganda
Chapter 7: The People vs. The Conspirators
Chapter 8: The Geneva Convention
Chapter 9: Ignoring the Constitution
Chapter 10: Summary of Evidence
Chapter 11: Are You On Their List?
Chapter 12: The Price of Apathy
Credits and Editors Note
Action Number 76-H-667
This is William R. Pabst. My address is 1434 West Alabama
Street, Houston, Texas, 77006. My telephone number is area
code 713 521-9896. This is my 1979 updated report on the
concentration camp program of the Department of Defense of the
On April 20, 1976, after a rapid and thorough investigation, I
filed suit on behalf of the People of the United States
against various personages that had a key part in a
conspiratorial program to do away with the United States as we
know it. This is a progress report to you, the plaintiffs, the
People of the United States. The civil action number is
76-H-667. It is entitled, "Complaint Against the Concentration
Camp Program of the Dept. of Defense". It was filed in the
U.S. District Court for the southern district of Texas,
Houston division. The judge responsible for the case was Judge
Carl Beau (phonetic spelling).
Chapter 1: A NATIONAL EMERGENCY
You have no doubt heard the story: Once upon a time, under the
Nazi regime in Germany, a man worked on an assembly line in a
baby carriage factory. His wife was going to have a baby, but
the Nazi government would not let anybody buy a baby carriage.
The man decided he would secretly collect one part from each
department and assemble the carriage himself. When this was
done he and his wife gathered up the pieces and assembled it.
When they were finished they did not have a baby carriage;
they had a machine gun.
And that is exactly the situation that I am going to present
to you at this time. The center for the Study for Democratic
Institutions recently completed a proposed constitution for
the "Newstates of America". The Center is Rockefeller funded.
To give you an indication of the type of constitution
proposed, the term "national emergency" is mentioned 134
times. The document did not have a Bill of Rights and the
right to own arms was taken away. At the same time, House
Concurrent Resolution #28 awaited for calling a constitutional
convention on or before July 4, 1976.
The presiding officer of such are event would have been Nelson
Rockefeller, Vice President and president pro tem of the
Senate. This particular resolution awaited in committee.
Obviously money would not be spent on these massive programs
unless there would be the chance for the actual implementation
of such a scheme.
However, in case the American people do not voluntarily adopt
a new constitution less troublesome to those who desire
dictatorship, there is Executive Order #11490, which will
include its predecessors when it is cited herein. The
Executive Order authorizes the secretaries of the various
agencies to prepare for any "national emergency" type
situation; including, but not limited to, those specified in
the Executive Order itself. If you read the Order, there is
nothing at all left to the imagination. For any conceivable
pretext, a national emergency may be declared based upon this
frightening decree, dated October 1969. The Order itself was
prefaced in March of 1969 by another Executive Order which
established the federal regions and their capitals. All the
departments of the government were involved, including the Law
Enforcement and Health, Education and Welfare. Congressman
Larry McDonald has revealed to Congress that various guerrilla
and terrorist groups were being financed by the federal
government. If they (the terrorist groups) actually began in
search of activities, Executive Order #11490 would be
But as mentioned previously, if you will read Executive Order
#11490, you will see that a "national emergency" may be
declared for any conceivable pretext whatsoever. If the Order
itself were activated, here is what would happen. The next day
you and your family would be standing in front of your local
post office with your neighbors; the front doors bursting with
block-long lines of people waiting to be registered. After
waiting in line with your family for hours, you finally get
channeled through the doors. Once inside, you overhear the
postal clerk with his sidearm on telling a frightened
registrant, "Look there is nothing I can do. The truck behind
the building will take you to a work camp where you have been
Your wife has been assigned to a factory and there's nothing I
can do." Then your son or daughter looks up at you with a
quivering voice and asks, "Dad, why are we here?"
Chapter 2: IMPLEMENTING
THE NEW GOVERNMENT
There's much more to life in a "free country" than paying your
mortgage. You have to be aware of what is going on and act
accordingly and participate in government; that is, get
involved. Examine the organization chart on Executive Order
#11490 to discover how we have all helped finance (through our
tax dollars) the mechanics of the overthrow of our
Constitution. Executive Order #11490 designates certain
authorities to the Office of Preparedness, which in turn
designates authority to the various departments of the federal
If the Order were implemented, the Post Office Department
would be responsible for a national registration. The State
Department would be responsible for the protection of the
United Nations personnel or property and prevention of escape
from the United States. The Department of Defense would be
responsible for its expropriation of industry; direction of
service and national production system; control of censorship;
and communication expropriation of non- industrial facilities.
The Commerce Department would be responsible for
expropriation, selection and international distribution of
commodities (which would be the actual looting of the United
States), census information and human resources.
The Treasury Department would be responsible for collection of
cash and non-cash items and the recreation of evidence of
assets and liabilities. The Justice Department would have
concurrent responsibility with the Department of State for
prevention of escape from the U.S.; for replenishing the
stockpile of narcotics; for a national police force; for
correctional and penal institutions; for mass feeding and
housing of prisoners, and for use of prisoners to augment
manpower which would be slave labor.
The Federal Bank (which is not a FEDERAL bank) would be
responsible for regulation of withdrawal of currency.
The General Services Administration would be responsible for
confiscation of private property for government use. Health
Education and Welfare would be responsible for nationalization
of education (which the Department of Education has already
done), health services, hospitals and mental institutions. The
Labor Department would be responsible for recruiting manpower;
referring manpower; and allocating manpower so each particular
person that was registered at the post office in this regional
registration would be told where be (or she) was going to
work. Housing & Urban Development would be responsible for
transfer of persons to temporary or permanent housing in
regional emergency planning and cooperation. The
Transportation Department is responsible for emergency
enforcement and control and movement of passengers and the
emergency operation of the Alaskan railroad.
There are two specific agencies here that we need to look at
and to keep in mind. They are: Health Education and Welfare,
and the Justice Department, as those two agencies are related
to the Department of Defense. The various military departments
are part of the Department of Defense. Under it, we have the
secretary of Army, Chief of Staff, Deputy Chief of Staff of
Personnel and law enforcement, U.S. Army's forces command, and
continental Army Reserve & National Guard. And under that we
have the four armies dividing up the United States. Under the
Fifth Army we have the provost marshal, who is directly
connected to the Deputy Chief of Staff for law enforcement
personnel. Under the provost marshal for the Fifth Army we
have the 300 Military Police Prisoner-of-War Command at
At this point I quote from retired Admiral Elmo Zumwalt's book
Henry Kissinger: I believe the American people lack the
will to do the things necessary to achieve parity and to
maintain maritime superiority. I believe we must get the
best deal we can in our negotiations before the United
States and the Soviet both perceive these changes and the
balance that occurs. When these perceptions are in
agreement, and both sides know the U.S. is inferior, we
must have gotten the best deal we can. Americans at that
time will not be happy that I have settled for second,
but it will be too late.
Zumwalt: Then why not take it to the American people?
They will not accept the decision to become second best
while we are in a position of Gross National product
twice that of the U.S.S.R.
Kissinger: That's a question of judgment. I judge that we
will not get their support and if we seek it and tell the
fact as we would have to, we would lose our negotiating
leverage with the Soviets.
Zumwalt: But isn't that the ultimate immorality in a
democracy; to make a decision for the people of such
importance without consulting them?
Kissinger: Perhaps, but I doubt that there are 1 million
who could even understand the issue.
Zumwalt: Even if that presumption is correct, those 1
million can influence the opinions of the majority of the
people. I believe it is my duty to take the other course.
Kissinger: You should take care, lest your words result
in a reduction in the Navy budget.
So we see what the intention of the State Department is
regarding the People. Another fact: On Dec. 30, 1975, the
California National Guard announced in a press release (which
I have) that the state's Military Police battalions were
organized and trained to provide immediate response to
virtually every civil and man-made disaster, as well as to
assist law enforcement officers in emergency situations; to
carry out their law enforcement as well as their military
mission. When I asked four of the defendants in this case for
their mission statement they did not provide it, although they
say it is public information.
The training spoken of for the California National Guard
covers such subjects as dealing with individual
civilians/civil population, detention procedures, citizen's
rights, and similar matters. And you know as well as I do that
when there is Martial raw, or Martial Rule, citizens have no
right, because the Constitution is preempted. Even the
uniforms of the National Guards who participate in this
program are different from the regular uniforms. Army
spokesmen will not reveal more about the uniforms, but the Los
Angeles Sheriff's Department para-military unit, who have
received this training have army fatigues dyed black for their
A further fact is the disaster preparedness plan for the
Marine Corps Supply Center in Barstow, California. Quoting
from that document:
Under the Constitution and the laws of the United States,
the preservation of law and order is the responsibility
of local and state government. And the authority to
maintain the peace and enforce the law is invested in the
authority of those governments.
There are specific exceptions to the above concept. One of
these pertains to federal intervention to civil disturbances
in certain situations. Military commanders are deemed to have
the inherent authority to take any measure reasonably
necessary for the protection of life and property in the event
of a sudden unexpected public calamity which disrupts the
normal process of government and presents an emergency so
eminent as to make it dangerous to await instructions from
appropriate authorities. This includes law enforcement duties.
The manual mentions something called "Garden Plot Forces"
which we will discuss at length in a few minutes.
Don Bell (who writes a weekly report) reported on July 25,
1975 that in May of 1975 the 303 Civil Affairs group of the
U.S. Army Reserves in Kearny, New Jersey conducted an exercise
to sharpen plans for a military takeover of the state
government. According to Colonel Frances Clart they had
conducted similar studies on how to seize municipal and county
government over the past few years. But this was the first
time they had studied STATE government. Such units were
trained during World War II to operate captured governments.
We never had federal troops training to take over government
in the United States. When local violence or catastrophe
struck, the National Guard, under command of the governor,
went into action. This is definitely not the situation at this
Chapter 3: CONTROLLING
On February 16, 1975, in the 'San Gabriel Valley Tribune' it
was reported that the Law Enforcement Assistance
Administration, funded by the Department of Justice, and the
Police Foundation, funded by the Ford Foundation, are prime
movers toward implementing a national police force. Each,
however, contends they support local police agencies. The
total program involves military units that have the function
of taking over the administration of local and state
governments. That program is "Operation Cable Splicer" by Army
civil affairs groups, a sub-plan of "Operation Garden Plot"
(the Martial law program).
The method by which the national police concept is being
presented to the public has changed. It was first disguised
under the cover of protection against civil disturbances. This
program was as follows:
A) Keep the people from gathering in the streets.
B) Isolate and neutralize the revolution's leadership.
C) Dispersal of crowds and demonstrators.
This is followed by successful prosecution in order to:
1) Validate the action of the police;
2) Deny the arrestee's propaganda materials, and;
3) Deny them the opportunity to recover money damages
against the police for arresting them.
Let me quote for you the scenario which was developed for
Cable Splicer One, Two and Three to justify the needs for
dealing with civil disturbances:
Phase One - an arrest and shooting provoke crowd unrest
and threats against public officials and a riot begins to
Phase Two - police vehicles are ambushed, various
attempted assassinations of public officials occur,
destruction and raiding of armories occur, and thousands
of people begin to gather and local police lose control;
Phase Three - increased movement of rioters and the
crowds must be dispersed before they become sympathetic
with the rioters. The National Guard and the local police
This scenario provides for an orderly transition from state to
federal control. The Deputy Attorney General of California
commented at a Cable Splicer Three conference that anyone who
attacks the State, even verbally, becomes a revolutionary and
an enemy by definition. They are the enemy and must be
destroyed. This program was taught in almost every state west
of the Mississippi River and included as participants local
active military, reserve military and civilian police. The
course name was "Civil Emergency Management Course". The
official explanation that was to be given if any questions
were asked about the program was: "This activity is a
continuous, joint law enforcement-military liaison effort and
a continuation of coordination established last year."
In 1976, the 'Oakland Tribune' carried the most complete
explanation of what is planned. It is reported in its entirety
in the 'National Chronicle' which added an analysis to the
story. (The 'Oakland Tribune's editor died suddenly after the
story was published.) And I quote:
Last Saturday the California National Guard unveiled a
new Law Enforcement Assistance Force, L.E.A.F., a
specially trained and outfitted Military Police Unit,
whose members will serve as shock-troops in the state's
war against political protesters and demonstrators.
I saw a full-dress exhibition of what the California
National Guard has planned for the next American
revolution. Helicopters, SWAT teams, civilian military
policemen in jack boots and helmets, twelve-gauge
shotguns,.38 and.45 caliber pistols, radios, walkie
talkies, and electrically-controlled intelligence centers
wired for instant communications with any police force in
L.E.A.F. is a 1,000 member unit put together this year to
handle unique law enforcement problems such as mass civil
disobedience, protest demonstrations and riots. In other
words, breaking heads and taking names. L.E.A.F. has the
support of Governor Brown, a quarter-million dollars
worth of grants from the federal government, and no
public opposition from civil liberties groups.
For all its ineptitude however, L.E.A.F. has a
frightening possibility from a civil liberty standpoint.
It is a direct product of the California "Cable Splicer"
conferences -- a series of high-level secret meetings
between government officials, law enforcement officers
and military planners held during the late '60s and early
'70s. The meetings were held as late as 1975 so far, as
many public records show. These were the conferences
which Counter-Spy magazine had identified as California's
"Garden Plot Sub-plan".
Gray Davis -- Gov. Brown's right hand man -- says
L.E.A.F. is to assist civil police, not to replace them.
Gray says, "Civilians could expect a civilian type law
enforcement rather than what is commonly known as Martial
Law." Despite this assurance, L.E.A.F.'s exercises look
disturbingly like the military coup described in the
novel, Seven Days In May.
L.E.A.F. soldiers with nightstick's stood at
intersections, stopping cars with suspicious occupants,
checking I.D. cards and generally intimidating onlookers
with their SWAT style uniforms, their sidearms and
helmets. Perhaps more ominously, several participants in
the role-playing exercises Saturday admitted that even
under simulated pressure there has already been a number
of incidents where the L.E.A.F. troops used excessive
force to quell disturbances -- even though their orders
Former L.E.A.A. administrator, Charles Ross Dovan (phonetic
spelling), is on record as having stated that local law
enforcement has failed and must be replaced by a national
police force. Patrick Murphy, the administrator of the Police
Foundation, states, "I have no fear of a national police
force. Our 40,000 police departments are not sacred."
Ex-Attorney General William Saxby warned that if we can go on
as we are, crime will invade us and the national police will
For the policemen who do not cooperate and still want to be
policemen, there is the program of Contemporary Research,
Inc., an organization of psychologists, sociologists,
education specialists and economic experts, who work toward a
solution of many of today's social problems. The same
organization develops specialized computer programming for the
new world-wide military command and control system, as well as
computer base systems for law enforcement agencies at all
levels of government.
The L.E.A.A. alone will receive over a billion dollars a year
over the next 4 years, even though it has been ineffective
against crime. This is because the L.E.A.A. is not geared to
fighting crime; it's geared to developing a system for
takeover of the United States with the assistance of the
Department of Defense.
Chapter 4: PLANS
FOR A POLICE STATE
One of the programs the Law Enforcement Assistance
Administration works on in its fight against crime is
psycho-surgery. If you don't cooperate with their programs,
you are merely operated on so that you will be as cooperative
as an adding machine. Or, the L.E.A.A. supports drug research
for the same purpose-to neurological sources violence. Hence,
as an example, if a law were passed whereby the ownership of
firearms was declared to be illegal, you would be placed in
one of these programs if you did not cooperate. The L.E.A.A.
control exercise (at the state's level) is from the Office of
Criminal Justice Planning of the Governor's Office. Here in
Texas, Mr. Robert C. Klowers is still the executive director
in that office. But all states have that particular
In May, 1975 the 'L.E.A.A. Newsletter' describes the function
of one of its organizations: the National Institute of Law
Enforcement & Criminal Justice. This organization funds
something called the "United Nations Clearinghouse" in Rome,
Italy. The function of that organization is, among other
things, the exchange of Criminal Justice System information
with the Soviet Union. And it goes without saying that we have
nothing to learn from the Criminal Justice System of the
Soviet Union. These incredible projects are being funded with
our tax dollars.
The code name for these projects are: "Garden Plot" and "Cable
Splicer'. Garden Plot is the program to control the
population. Cable Splicer is the program for an orderly
takeover of the state and local government by the federal
An investigation was completed in November 1975 by 4 sources:
The Conservative publication, 'American Challenge'; the
leftist 'New Times'; the foundation financed Fund for
Investigative Journalism, and; Don Wood of the trustworthy
'Ozark Sunbeam'. It involves the potential creation of a
Police State through the use of the Pentagon and its
computerized intelligence dossier (lodged in the Pentagon
basement) of thousands of citizens by the National Guard,
state and local police departments, the L.E.A.A., plainclothes
military forces, SWAT teams, and the Department of Justice.
Brigadier General J. L. Julienit (phonetic spelling), senior
Army officer of the Pentagon National Guard Bureau, has
admitted, "I know of no state that did not have some form of
these exercises within the last year."
Today the Cable Splicer handbook is composed of 6 loose-leaf
3-ring binders that are merely an outline for the impending
takeover and destruction of our Constitution. The Sixth Army
used the term "Cable Splicer" for the name of the operation,
but it is not revealed the name of the operation in the other
military areas within the U.S.
On page 4, paragraph 10 on Public Information, the
As a means to prevent adverse publicity or misleading
psychological effects in regard to coordinating,
planning, and conducting this exercise, all military
participants involved will perform such duties in
civilian clothing when exercise oriented activities are
conducted at law enforcement facilities. In the event
inquiries are received regarding this exercise, the
response should be limited to identifying the activity as
a continuous, joint law enforcement military liaison
effort and a continuation of coordination established
On page 6, security guidance is explained to the effect that
if anybody asks any questions, limit the information that is
given out on the basis of it being in the interest of
"national interest" (security).
Now, in the festivities celebrating the success of completion
of the exercises, Attorney General Stanley R. Larsen, the
commanding general of the Sixth Army stated:
The most serious challenge facing all of us will be the
challenge of discharging our legitimate responsibilities.
For a significant portion of a society at large is likely
to regard us with suspicion and t question, even
challenge our authority on the basic assumption of our
profession. Part of this challenge we must be prepared to
deal with; a potentially dangerous portion of our society
which, in truth, could well become the domestic enemy.
The manual includes instructions on operation of confinement
facilities, handling and processing prisoners; including
searching, transporting, feeding, housing and handling of the
special class of persons called "detainees". The plan also
specifically includes a proposition for confiscation of
privately-owned weapons and ammunition.
Chapter 5: PREPARING
TO TAKE PRISONERS
The Army has over 350 separate record centers containing
substantial information on civilian political activities.
Virtually every major army unit has its own set aside from
this. The Fifth Army of San Antonio has over 100,000 files of
its own. The overall operation command post is a domestic room
at the Pentagon. There are 25 million card on individuals and
760,000 on organizations held by the Defense Central Index of
investigations alone. And this information includes political,
sociological, economic and psychological profiles. All this
type of information on 25 million Americans.
Since 1970 local county and state police forces all over the
country have undertaken crash programs to install various
kinds of computerized information systems. A large portion of
this is being paid for by the Law Enforcement Assistance
Administration. Beginning in 1970, Congress and the Joint
Chiefs of Staff ordered the destruction of all these data
banks, but they were not destroyed. All the outlawed
collection is now located at Mt. Weathey, Clark County, West
Virginia and similar Pentagon facilities designed as adjuncts
to the president's emergency powers under the Executive
The cadre of specialized persons to enforce this plan are
found in the U.S. Army Reserves Military Police POW Command at
Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Fenren (phonetic spelling) of the 300th
Military Police POW Command at Livonia told me, when I called
him from the Federal Information Center at Houston, that the
camps in the Command were for foreign prisoners of war and for
"enemies of the United States". I asked him if enemies of the
United States included U.S. citizens. He became angry,
wouldn't deny it and referred me to a very sinister individual
at the Army Reserve facility here at Houston who I talked to;
who explained to me that the prisoners were called "inventory"
and "internees". He would not deny that the camps were for
I called the Pentagon, spoke with the defendant there, and
then with the provost marshal for the Fifth Army, and do you
know what? Not one of these persons would deny that the system
was for U.S. citizens. The provost marshal for the Fifth Army,
when I mentioned the names of all the camp sites, said; "Well
at least you've got that right."
The names of the detention facilities that I gave him were a
list that I had acquired from the 'Ozark Sunbeam'. That list
of names was the same list of facilities designated under the
old Detention Act of 1950 as "emergency detention centers".
But there is only one problem: That act was supposed to have
been repealed in 1971. After some research, I found out what
the problem was. One Congressman, when the hearings were held
for the repeal of the Emergency Detention Act, mentioned that
there are 17 other bits of law that provided for the same
thing. So it didn't matter whether they ever repealed the
Emergency Detention Act. The public was in fact tricked by the
Congress of the United States!
Here are the designated sites: Tucked away in the Appalachian
Mountains of central Pennsylvania is a bustling town of
approx. 10,000 people. Fifteen to twenty years ago it was a
sleepy village of 400. Allanwood, Pennsylvania is linked to
New York City by Interstate U.S. 80. It takes up approximately
400 acres and is surrounded by a 10-foot barbed-wire fence. It
now holds approximately 300 minimum security prisoners to keep
it in shape. It could hold 12,000 people from one day to the
Thirty miles from Oklahoma City on U.S. 66 is El Reno,
Oklahoma with an approximate population of 12,000. Due west, 6
miles from tow, almost in sight of U.S. 66 is a complex of
buildings which could pass for a small school. However, the
facility is overshadowed by a guard house which appears to be
something like airport control tower, except that it's manned
by a vigilant, uniformed guard. This is a federal prison camp
or detention center. These camps are all located near
super-highways or near railroad tracks or both.
The federal prison camp at Florence, Arizona could hold 3,500
prisoners. It is presently kept in condition by approximately
400 legally convicted prisoners. Wickenberg, Arizona is famous
for its municipal airport, which was once government-owned. It
is now occupied by a private party. It is rumored to be
capable of being taken back by the federal government without
Now there are a couple other of these facilities which
probably exist under the same arrangements. This particular
rumor has existed for about 9 or 10 years. The only way it can
actually be established is by looking at the local contract
for the Wickenberg Municipal Airport itself and the parties
that have possession of it.
As I mentioned previously, these names were ratified by the
provost marshal of the Fifth Army who is in charge of the
300th Military Police POW Command. He is the one who verified
them. He said, as I mentioned before, "Well at least you've
got that right."
Some of the locations are: Tool Lake in California, now in
private hands. It can be retaken without notice. Mill Point,
West Virginia. I couldn't find a thing on Mill Point, but in
that area we have all kinds of prisons; Alderson, W.V., a
women's federal reformatory; Lewisburg, W.V., a federal
prison; Greenville, S.C. in Greenville County is now occupied
by the State Youthful Offenders Division. Even that is a
mystery to the people of that area.
At Montgomery, Alabama we have a federal civilian prison camp
at Maxwell Air Force Base. Now does that sound right? There's
one at Tucson, Arizona, David Munson Air Base. In Alaska we
have Elmendorf at Eielson Air Force Base.
And that brings us to a facility in Florida called Avon Park,
Florida. I sent a representative to see what was there. He
found the Avon Park Bombing and Gunnery Range, which is also
listed as the Avon Park Correctional Institute. No one is
permitted entrance and probably there is no over flight
permitted because it is a bombing and gunnery range. This was
one of the places ratified by the provost marshal of the Fifth
In 1976, as well as on March 20, 1979, I went to the Sheriff's
Department in Houston to see if our local Sheriff had been
infiltrated by these plans. Well, it appears so. I was put in
contact with a Lt. Kiljan (phonetic spelling) who is in charge
of some secret unit in the department. I asked him if be had
participated in military training or in training with military
personnel here in the Sheriff's Department. He denied it, and
when I asked him if be would testify so under oath he became
angry and stated, "You are just an ordinary citizen. I don't
have to tell you anything." I later discovered that Lt. Kiljan
is the ex-director of the Houston branch office of the U.S.
Secret Service. Now where does his money come from? The area
is administered by the Houston- Galveston Area Council.
In this regional government plan, each federal region is
divided into state clearinghouses, and each state
clearinghouse is divided into area clearinghouses. And for our
area we have the Houston- Galveston Area Council. It serves as
a conduit for federal funds in two major areas: L.E.A.A. and
Most everybody thinks this organization (the Houston-Galveston
area Council) is for the development of the area; the
geographical area here in Houston. It is not. It is for the
development of L.E.A.A. and H.E.W. projects. Now this finds
its counterpart in every community across the U.S. It provides
for these agencies a liaison for intergovernmental
communications, interaction and coordination.
Chapter 6: MIND
CONTROL: DRUGS AND PROPAGANDA
I examined their projects to see what they were doing. This
regional government program distributes federal funds for two
1) Radio hookups between every police agency in the state
to Fort Sam Houston, and;
2) Mental health programs,including programs for the
mentally ill having priority of beds and hospitals.
Another interesting fact to consider is that in the Pine Bluff
Arkansas Arsenal "B-Z" is stored. It's a nerve gas which
creates sleepiness, dizziness, stupor, and the incapacity to
move about. According to the Associated Press, the agent can
be sprayed by aerosol, injected or sprayed over large areas by
a bomb. The Military has admitted that one potential use of
the gas is for civilian control. So whatever they planned,
they've also planned a way for you to go to your destination
in a tranquil state of mind.
H.E.W., by law, is operated in conjunction with the United
Nations through the World Health Organization. Back in 1948,
the International Congress on Mental Health, a U.N.
organization, declared in its pamphlet "Mental Health and
World Citizenship" that;
Prejudice, hostility or excessive nationalism may become
deeply imbedded in the developing personality without
awareness on part of the individual concerned. In order
to be effective, efforts of changing individual must be
appropriate to the successive stages of the unfolding
personality. While in a case of a group of society,
change will be strongly resisted unless an attitude of
acceptance has first been engendered.
Principles of Mental health cannot be successfully
furthered in any society unless there is progressive
acceptance of the concept of world citizenship,...
Programs for social change to be effective require a
joint effort of psychiatrists and social scientist,
working together in cooperation with statesmen,
administrators and others in positions of responsibility.
The three phases of the development are:
1) Mental hospitals for segregation, care and protection
of persons of unsound minds.;
2) Community Mental Health Care Centers, so that persons
may be treated in their own neighborhood.;
3) Child Care Centers for dealing with early difficulties
of nationalism in a child's life.
Two years earlier, Major General G.B. Chisholm, Deputy
Minister of Health in Canada, who later became director of
United Nations World Health Organization, explained;
"Self defense may involve a neurotic reaction when it
means defending one's own excessive material wealth from
others who are in great need. This altitude leads to
So his solution to the problem is: Let's redistribute the
wealth among everyone.
Further, the reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the
individual's concept of right and wrong which has been the
basis of child training are the belated objectives of
practically all effective psychotherapies. Now if we digress
even further, to Buria (phonetic spelling), the director of
the Soviet Secret Police in the 1930's, we see he explained
the communist political strategy through the use of "mental
healing" of psychiatry:
Psycho-politics is the art and science of asserting and
of maintaining a dominion over the thoughts and loyalties
of individuals, officers, bureaus, and masses, and the
effecting of the conquest of enemy nations through mental
healing. You must work... until every teacher of
psychology unknowingly or knowingly teaching only
communistic doctrine under the guise of psychology.
If you look at the Russian manual of instruction of psycho-
political warfare, we see in chapter 9;
Psycho-political operations should at all times be alert
to the opportunities to organize for the betterment of
the community mental health centers.
Now, under the new national Mental Health program at this
moment there are more than 600 of these community mental
health centers across the United States. The whole thing was
promoted by Dr. Stanley F. Yoles (phonetic spelling), who was
the director of the National Institute of Mental Health in
1969. And he stated back then, that the newest trend in
treating mental illness is care at local health care centers
where the patient is not isolated from his (or her) family and
friends. They have been working on this program for 46 years
publicly. Now across the U.S through your tax dollars you have
603 centers (to be exact); Community Health Centers that are
all part of this program.
And this is how they are part of the program (it has already
happened): In the mid-1950s, there were set into motion an
interesting chain of events. About 1956 the Alaska Mental
Health Bill was proposed and later passed. It granted
approximately 12 million dollars, and 1 million acres of
public land to Alaska so that it could develop its own mental
health program. Now this was a little abnormal since Alaska
only had a little over 400 people who were classified as
After the bill was passed, Alaska passed its own enabling
legislation to get into the mental health business. They
started by adopting the essential elements of the Public
Health Service Draft Act on the hospitalization of the
mentally ill in the old "Interstate Compact on Mental Health",
now called the Uniform Mental Health Act. There were no
provisions for jury trial in it or anything else. You would
just be picked up and taken to the Alaskan-Siberian Asylum
incommunicado and the state would also confiscate all of your
personal and real property! And they actually tried to do it
in 1954 in the case of Ford vs. Milinak (phonetic spelling),
which declared the act as adopted in another state (Missouri)
But the act itself still exists, modified, but essentially in
the same form, the Uniform Mental Health Act to which
approximately 6 states subscribe. And in passing most State
Constitutions, if you will check them from the period of 1935,
made a part of their constitution the practice of having a
person submit to a 90-day mental examination to determine his
(or her) sanity, without any provisions for a trial by jury.
This was part of the national program at that time.
In this act, the governor could have anyone picked up and sent
to the Mental Health Institution in Alaska or elsewhere. The
result as rumors back in the '50s, were that there was in fact
a sinister, Frankenstein-type mental health prison in Alaska.
I wrote to Alaska (the officials that is) and asked them for a
description of the land of 1 million acres that they were
eligible to receive, under the Alaska Mental Health Act, were.
And I also asked them for a copy of the inventory they ran for
their facilities back at that same time. Well, so far no
answer. And probably, I will never receive an answer without a
But through the years, there was a spot in Alaska that was
continually referred to: Southeast of Fairbanks; southwest of
Fairbanks; northwest of Fairbanks; somewhere near Fairbanks.
Then I received information that a pilot had flown over the
area once and had his license revoked. And so, for $1.85 each,
I ordered the low-level navigation maps from the federal
government for Alaska and located the Alaska-Siberian Asylum
for the treatment of enemies of the United States. It's right
where rumor over the past 20 years had placed it: Southwest of
Fairbanks. It stands out like a sore thumb! It's the only one
of that geometric configuration within the sate of Alaska, and
you will note a black line running up through Fairbanks and
down over near that area of the map. That is the railroad that
the Department of Transportation would take the emergency
operation of, under the Executive Order, if the Executive
Order went into effect. And H.E.W. would be responsible for
making a determination of whether or not you were mentally
disturbed because of your nationalistic tendencies, your love
for the United States, or your adherence to any political or
But let's look a little further into the type of program that
the L.E.A.A. is paying for through the Department of Justice.
The Federal Bureau of Prisons, located in the backwoods of
North Carolina, near a tiny village called Butner, is
constructing a mammoth 42 acre research complex for prisoners
from throughout the East. Who will be sent for experiments to
test new behavioral programs and techniques? Target date for
completion of the entire system is ironically 1984.
And so, they're using right now, under the L.E.A.A. program,
something called anectine (Phonetic spelling). Punishment for
troublesome behavior within the prison is being done by drugs
and shock, likely to be the most selected examples of programs
that have made use of anectine, a derivative of South American
curare. Anectine was originally used as a beginning factor to
electro- convulsive shock. Such shocks applied to the bead are
so strong they can break and graze bones under the strain of
resulting muscle contractions. Since anectine paralyzed the
muscles without dampening consciousness or the ability to feel
pain, by first injecting the inmates with it, researchers can
turn up the voltage as high as they want without cracking the
inmates' skeleton when his body is thrown into convulsions by
What the anectine does, in short, is to simulate death within
30 to 40 seconds of injection. It brings on paralysis first
with the small rapidly moving muscles in the nose, fingers and
eyes, and then in the diaphragm and the cardiovascular system.
As a result, the patient cannot move or breathe and yet
remains fully conscious, as though drowning and dying. This is
from the 1974 publication, 'Human Behavior'.
Chapter 7: THE
PEOPLE VS. THE CONSPIRATORS
The federal government answered my suit in June (1976) by
filing an unsworn general denial of everything that I had
alleged. I spoke with the assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of
the case and asked him if he had gone to the trouble to call
any of the parties mentioned in the suits. since I had
provided not only the addresses, but their telephone numbers
to provide a faster means of investigation. He said he had
not. He had not even done a minimal amount of investigation of
the case, but yet he filed a denial of my allegations.
I filed a motion in the meantime to take the deposition of the
person who writes the training programs for the concentration
camp guards, Mr. Richard Burrage, the 75th Maneuver Air
Command at Army Reserve Center at Houston, Texas, stating that
in light of all the recent activity of government agents, one
of the agencies involved might attempt to murder this key
witness, the author of the training camp program. The federal
Judge denied my motion, stating that I had not quoted enough
cases to him justifying my request. However, he was also aware
as that there were no cases existing on this set of facts, but
as you will see as I go along with this report, he chose to
I then made an agreement with the assistant U.S. Attorney to
take the deposition to Mr. Burrage. After I'd made the
arrangements, the U.S. Attorney refused to voluntarily go
along with taking the deposition. It is very difficult to find
justice in our system of courts.
Law is usually practiced by the "buddy system", hence the
court rules are overlooked or not followed.
On July 20, a hearing was held at the magistrates of Norman
Black U.S. District Court in Houston. The courtroom was
completely filled with spectators. And although the news media
had been contacted, no representatives of the press were
there. There is a news media blackout on this matter here in
Brief oral arguments were presented. The U.S. Attorney
explained that I was not the proper person to bring the suit
because, although the free exercise of my constitutional
rights was threatened by the concentration camp program as
alleged, it did not constitute my injury. The magistrate was
impressed with the information I had thus far collected and
stated that he would bring it to the attention of the federal
judge. The U.S. Attorney tried to have my investigation of the
case halted, but the magistrate would not go along that far
with a pre-arranged decision.
As an additional indication of what I was up against, the
original hearing was scheduled for 10:30 in the morning.
However, the U.S. Attorney had secretly had the time changed
to 2:30 in the afternoon. The magistrate gave the U.S.
Attorney permission to file for motion to dismiss because he
felt that the concentration camp program, to be used for
persons who exercise their freedom of speech, did not present
Now, on July 23 I had placed in the 'Houston Post' and in the
'Houston Chronicle' newspapers the following advertisement in
the legal section. Quote: "Solicitation for witnesses in Civil
Action 78-H-667, Federal District Court of Houston, People
extemporal William Pabst vs. Gerald Ford et al. The action
Complaint Against the Concentration Camp Program of the
Dept. of Defense. Attention: If you have participated in
Operation Garden Plot, Operation Cable Splicer, the 300th
Military Police Prisoner of War Command, or the Army
Reserve Civil Affairs group, you may be involved in a
program that needs to be deposed for this suit. To give
your testimony call or write; (and here I placed my name
address and telephone number).
As I previously mentioned, there is a news media blackout on
the story here in Houston. Both newspapers refused to carry
the ad. First at the 'Houston Post'; I had to threaten them
with a law suit to carry out the ad, even though I was paying
for it. And then at the 'Chronicle'; I had to meet with the
president and various vice presidents because a refusal from
that paper had come up from their own lawyers. Both newspapers
finally carried it, but only after two days of complaining.
The initial response of both papers was; "We don't carry
stories like that", and; "Don't you think that the people
planning the concentration camps have our best interests in
mind?" As you will hear for yourselves, the policies
definitely do not reflect our best interests.
The next event that occurred was that the U.S. Attorney filed
a "Statement of Authority", showing the reasons that he could
find why I should not be allowed to take depositions to get
more information from the person who was writing the
concentration camp guard training program. However, his brief
was completely filled with misquotes of the law from many
cases. He'd mention the case and then invent whatever the case
should say. In my brief to the court at this point, I notified
the judge of the violation of the law requiring honesty in
such matters. But the notification was ignored by the judge,
who apparently sanctioned this most dishonest of acts commonly
known as "quoting out of context".
Chapter 8: THE
My brief filed on August 27. On August 31, formal arguments
were set. The new courtroom of the magistrate was almost
filled again. However, no one from the news media showed up
for this hearing either. The few who were contacted had been
told not to go; they would lose their jobs.
At the hearing I introduced evidence that heretofore had never
been introduced in any court of law in the U.S. The U.S.
Attorney had denied, you will remember, everything in my suit
without so much as even a tiny investigation. So I introduced
him to evidence the following letter from the Department of
the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff of Personnel,
signed by; I.B. Sergeant, Colonel G.S., Acting Director of
Human Resources Development. Quoting:
On behalf of President Ford, I am replying to your letter
27 May, 1976, regarding a news article in the Dallas
Morning News. As much as he would like to, the president
cannot reply personally to every communication he
receives. Therefore, he has asked the departments and
agencies of the federal government in those instances
where they have special knowledge or special authority
For this reason your communication was forwarded to
officials of the Dept. of Defense. Within the Dept. of
Defense, the Army is responsible for custody and
treatment of enemy prisoners of war and civilian
internees as defined under terms of the Geneva Convention
of 1949. Therefore, the Army is prepared to detain
prisoners of war and detainees as defined in Article IV
of the 1949 Geneva Convention relative to the treatment
of prisoners of war and protection of civilian persons.
It is U.S. policy that its Armed Forces adhere to the
provisions of international law to set the example for
other countries of the world to follow and respecting the
right and dignity of those who become victim of
international conflict. It should be noted that the Army
program is designed for implementation during conditions
of war between the U.S. and one or more foreign
countries. The Army had no plans nor does it maintain
detention camps to imprison American citizens during
The problem with this letter is that it's not true, and that's
what I'm going to discuss at this point. First of all, in
verifying the authenticity of the claims in the letter, I
checked the Geneva text and there is no article in the Geneva
Convention entitled as the letter states. There is, however,
on each of the classifications; "Protection of War
Victims/Civilian Persons" and a separate article on "Prisoners
of War". That was the first discrepancy. Then I turned to
Article IV of the Geneva Convention. That article did not set
up any requirements or authorizations for military units of
any type and does not even suggest it. Hence, the second
The next problem with the letter from President Ford's
representative is that it states that he prisoner of war guard
program is set up for the implementation for "conditions of
war between the U.S. and one or more (foreign) countries."
However, Article III of the Geneva Convention reads that the
treaty applies to (and I am quoting): "In case of an armed
conflict not of an international character, occurring within
the territory of one of the high contracting parties."
Obviously and armed conflict occurring within one's own
territory did not mean between one or more of the parties to
the treaty, especially if only one is involved. Now, the
examples of this type of conflict are: civil war, armed
insurgency and guerrilla activities. In other words, they're
speaking of a domestic conflict.
An even more shocking item is found in the last pages of the
1949 Geneva Convention under "Protection of War
Victims/Civilian Persons". You will find the index card, the
identification card, forms to be used for writing your family,
and everything necessary for the administration of a
concentration camp is contained in this treaty that the U.S.
signed and ratified. Further, if there is a conflict in the
U.S. involving only the U.S. this convention or treaty can go
into operation; which includes the procedures for setting up
the concentration camps.
Article LXVIII of the Convention states (and I paraphrase): If
you commit an offense that is solely intended to harm the
occupying power, not harming the life or limb of members of
the occupying power, but merely talking against such a force,
such as the Martial Law situation, you can be imprisoned
provided that the duration of such imprisonment is
proportional to he offense committed. Well, President Dwight
Eisenhower didn't feel that provision was strong enough. So he
had the following additions placed in the treaty, which
states: "The U.S. reserves the right to impose the death
penalty in accordance with the provisions of Article LXVIII
without regard to whether the offenses referred to therein are
punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory at
the time the occupation begins."
So not only can you be imprisoned for having exercised freedom
of speech; you can be put to death under the provisions of the
Geneva Convention in 1949 for having exercised, or attempting
to exercise, freedom of speech.
The next item that I introduced into evidence was a field
manual; FM 41-10, "Civil Affairs Operation". You will remember
at the outset that I mentioned Civil Affairs groups. Let me
quote to you from that manual what one of the functions of the
Civil Affairs activities includes:
Item 4. Assumption of full or partial executive,
legislative and judicial authority over a country or
So let's see what a "country or area" is defined as in the
same manual. It includes:
small towns and rural areas, municipalities of various
population sizes, districts, counties, provinces or
states, regions of national government.
Nowhere in the manual does it exclude this program from being
put into effect right here in the United States. As a matter
of fact in Kearny, New Jersey, the Civil Affairs group went
into that area and practiced taking over that governmental
unit. And yet the Army in its letter of June 16-states that
these programs are not for us. Yet they are practiced here in
the United States under conditions that can only occur here at
The study outline of field manual, FM 41-10 on page j-24 under
"Penal Institutions 1-B", you see there is a program on
concentration camps and labor camps-number, location and
capacity. It is important to note that a concentration camp
and a labor camp are always located near each other, for
Again on page d-4 of the same manual you'll find a sample
receipt for seized property; a sample receipt written in
English and containing terminology applicable to only U.S.
On page 8-2 of the same manual, under the heading "Tables of
Organization and Equipment", we find that there are 3 other
organizations that would be working along with the Civil
Affairs operation: The Chemical Service Organization, the
Composite Service Organization, and the Psychological
Operations Organization, along with the various Civil Affairs
In July of that year (1976), the following Civil Affairs
groups met with the following airborne groups at a staging
area in Fort Chaffee, Arkansas. A staging area is where
military units meet before they go into action. They met with
the 82nd Airborne and part of the 101st Airborne; the 32nd
Civil Affairs group of San Antonio, Texas headquarters; the
362nd Civil Affairs brigade from Dallas, Texas; the 431st
Civil Affairs company from Little Rock Arkansas headquarters;
the 306th Civil Affairs group, U.S. Army Reserves,
Fayetteville, Arkansas commanded by Lt. Colonel N. McQuire
(phonetic spelling) and William Highland. The 486th Civil
Affairs company from Tulsa, Oklahoma; the 418th Civil Affairs
company from Kansas City, MO.; the 307th Civil Affairs group
from St. Louis, MO.; the 490th Civil Affairs group from
Abilene, Tex.; the 413th company from Hanlin, La; the 12th
S.S. group, 2nd Battalion (headquarters unknown).
They're ready to go into action. The problem is as it appears
they were ready to take over the entire government of the
United States as their mission sets out. One man who attended
this staging area talked to a Civil Affairs sergeant and asked
him what his job was. The sergeant explained that the
civilians of this country will really be surprised some day
when the Civil Affairs groups begin to operate the government.
Now the Dept. of the Army still maintains that all this is not
for the United States, yet this training continues here for
us. The evidence is overwhelming; the plan exists for the
imprisonment of millions of U.S. citizens. And even through
all this information was presented to the federal magistrate,
he still felt that no one was injured by such a plot.
On the 2nd day of September, 1976, the magistrate recommended
to the federal judge that the case be dismissed. And the sole
basis for his reasoning to dismiss was that we have to be
actually physically injured before we can maintain a law suit
of this type. He did not feel that although all this active
planing, preparation and training was going on, that any U.S.
citizen had been injured even though the citizen may fear
exercising his or her freedom for fear of being detained and
imprisoned in a concentration camp at a later date.
Chapter 9: IGNORING
The case of Tatum B. Laird, heard before the Supreme Court in
1974, is a case in point. It involved the Army intelligence
collecting apparatus, which was developing a list of names of
persons who the Army felt were troublesome. The Supreme Court
held that the making of lists of this type did not of and by
itself present any injuries. The minority opinion in that case
was that the injury in the case with a program such as this
made people afraid to use their freedom of speech for fear of
being sent to jail for it. But the majority did not buy that
The difference between that case and this case although we
also have the computer program, is that we have something much
further past that point; the concentration camp guard program
and the Civil Affairs program for the taking over of all
functions of our government. In light of that the federal
judge said that this is not an injury. As a matter of fact the
U.S. Attorney alleged that even if people were placed in
concentration camps, if they were all treated the same they
would still not have the right to go to federal court.
On the 20th day of September, I filed a memorandum to notify
the magistrate and the federal judge that I had discovered
that the federal government had a program for a number of
years to suspend our constitutional right of the writ of
habeas corpus. This information substantiated the complaint.
Habeas corpus is the name of that legal instrument utilized to
bring someone before a judge when that person is being
illegally imprisoned or detained so that he (or she) may
obtain his (or her) freedom. The Constitution states that the
writ of habeas corpus shall never be suspended.
I found the disturbing information in a report; 94-755, 94th
Congress, 2nd Session Senate, April 26th, 1976, entitled
"Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans Book II".
On page 17-d, entitled "First Amendment Rights", the report
states that more importantly "the government surveillance
activities in the aggregate, whether expressly intended to do
so, to deter the exercise of First Amendment rights by
American citizens who become aware of the government's
domestic intelligence program."
Beginning on page 54 it is stated that, beginning in 1946,
four years before the Emergency Detention Act of 1950 was
passed, the FBI advised the Attorney General that it had
secretly compiled a secret index of potentially dangerous
persons. The Justice Dept. then made tentative plans for
emergency detention based on suspension of the privilege of
the writ of habeas corpus. Department officials deliberately
avoided going to Congress. When the Emergency Detention Act of
1950 was passed, it did not authorize the suspension of the
writ of habeas corpus. But shortly after passage of that act
according to a bureau document, Attorney General J.R. McGraft
told the FBI to disregard it and to proceed with the program
as previously outlined.
A few sentences later on page 55 it states, "With the security
index, use broader standards to determine potential
dangerousness than those described in the statute." And unlike
the act, Department plans provided for issuing a master search
warrant and a master arrest warrant. This is the center
importance: It is the same thing that I am alleging in federal
court, yet the magistrate chose to ignore these facts also.
We have government officials not only ignoring the will of
Congress, but doing the opposite of what the Constitution
provides by planning illegally for the suspension of the writ
of habeas corpus. In addition, as mentioned before, the master
search warrant and the master arrest warrant are forms fed
into the computer, which print the names and addresses on them
from the tapes previously prepared by the
As you are arrested, your home will be searched and anything
found there may be confiscated. This program has existed since
1946 up to and including 1973, and without proper access to
judicial discovery techniques, it can't be determined whether
the same plan now exists under the same name or under another
name right now.
This memorandum was filed on September 28 to make the court
aware of the danger that our rights of freedom of speech and
lawful assembly are in. But the court, on September 30, after
this notification was received, dismissed the case. However,
in keeping with the practice of federal courts in Houston of
actively participating in the obstruction of justice, I was
not notified of the dismissal until the 6th of October, which
gave me just 2 working days to submit any further motion in a
10-day period before time starts running for the appeal.
What I have just said regarding the federal courts in Houston
is not only my opinion; the 'Houston Chronicle', surprisingly,
published an extensive document severely criticizing the
federal court in Houston for making up their own rules as they
go along with the proceeding, as well as commenting on the
communist-like Supreme Court attitude of the judges and court
personnel. My experience here has been that the court has
returned to me almost every document I filed. Then after a big
argument they reaccept the document, stating that they just
made a mistake. In reality, the Power structure doesn't want
these type of cases in any federal court.
SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE
On the 8th of October, I had submitted a request for finding
the facts in the filing which had been established by the
1) The 300th Military Police POW Command is located at
2) The Dept. of the Army has stated that said Command
exists per se the Geneva Convention of 1949, a treaty of
the U.S., Article IV thereof under the title relative to
the treatment of prisoners of war and protection of
3) No such title exists in the Geneva Convention per se.
4) There are separate titles, one which is;
a. Multilateral Protection of War Victims/Prisoners
of War; b. Multilateral Protection of War
5) Nevertheless, Article IV of both titles does not
provide for the creation of any military programs for
6) Whether Mr. Fenren of the 300th Military Police POW
Command has stated that the purpose of the Command is for
the detention of foreign prisoners of war and enemies of
the United States.
7) Further, Article III, concerning civilian persons,
makes the treaty applicable to conflicts occurring solely
within the territory of the United States that are not of
an international character, which is capable of including
any type of conflict in its description whether it be
civil war or guerrilla activity or anything else. The
In case of armed conflict not of an international
character occurring in the territory of one of the high
contracting parties, each party to a conflict shall be
bound to apply to the minimum of the following
8) Dept. of the Army field manual FM41-10, Civil Affairs
Operations of Civil Affairs Organization, lists as one of
its functions the assumption of full or partial
executive, legislative and judicial authority over a
count or an area and there is no specific exclusion of
the United States as such a country or area.
9) Said manual defines country along certain geographical
population basis, county, state regions and national
10) Said organization has in fact conducted practiced
takeovers of local and state governments in the
continental United States, including but not limited to
the state of New Jersey.
11) Said organization includes in its study outline on
page j-24 a section on concentration camps and labor
12) Said organization includes in it operations composite
service operations and psychological operations
13) Said psychological operation is working with the U.S.
Public Health Service, are prepared to operate any and
all mental health facilities in the United States as
tools of repression against outspoken but nonviolent
political conduct of the United States citizens in
conjunction with all the above, which is to be used for
the same purpose.
14) Further, the Dept. of Justice, in conjunction with
this program, has had plans for the suspension of writ of
habeas corpus since the year of 1946; has planned
depriving persons being detained under this total program
any means for protection against tyrannical political
The plaintiff requested that the court make findings of fact
and draw conclusions of law, consistent therewith as shown by
the evidence on record before the court. The effect of this
request is that the case must go back to the district judge
for further consideration. I mentioned that it appeared that
all this planning for concentration camps was to be directed
against anyone regardless of his political persuasion or his
ideology who exercised freedom of speech against the
established power structure of international bankers and
multinational corporations. But with Proposition B-type
movements threatening to reduce taxes throughout our nation, I
foresee an activation of emergency programs so that the
parasites on the federal take will continue to receive their
ARE YOU ON THEIR LIST?
In the same Senate document, on intelligence activities on the
right of Americans referred to on pages 166 and 167, you will
find that the federal government has targeted its intelligence
activities against one group of Americans. On page 166 the
first classification listed is rightists and anti-Communist
groups. The first group on Page 167 on Army surveillance lists
the John Birch Society as number 1 and the Young Americans for
Freedom as the number 2 target. Therefore, the groups of U.S.
American citizens considered to be the biggest enemy of the
United States by the federal government at this is the
Although this information has been available since April of
this year (1979), no one has mentioned this incredible
discovery that the federal government considers the patriotic
conservative as its greatest enemy. I have received all kinds
of information regarding this case from all across the United
THE PRICE OF APATHY
I obtained the 1945 report of the O.S.S. (office of Strategic
Services), the precursor of the C.I.A., 7th. Army, William W.
Quinn, Colonel G.F.C.A.C. of the G2, on the liberation of
Dachau, a concentration camp during the liberation in Germany.
It contains many groups of information, but the relevant
portion of the report concerns itself with the section on the
townspeople. Quoting from his report, on why the people of
this little town didn't complain or didn't overthrow
oppressors, but just continued to go along and get along even
though they lost their freedom in the process. I quote:
These words crop up and up again. They are the
rationalization of a man who admits that he was a member
of the Nazi party. "I was forced to do so by business
reasons", they state. We were lied to in every respect
but they admit they knew the camp existed. But they saw
the work detail to the inmates passing through the
streets under guard, and in some instances the S.S.
behaved brutally even towards the townspeople.
When asked if they realized that within the last 3 months
before the liberation 13,000 men lost their lives within
stone's throw of where the people lived, they claimed
they were shocked and surprised.
When asked if they never saw transports of dead and dying
pass through he streets along the railway, they referred
only to the last one. They insist that most of the trains
came in at night and that they were sealed cars.
Did they never ask what was in the endless procession of
cars that came in full and always went out empty? A
typical reply was, "We were told it was all army material
and booty from France."
It is established that anyone who stated that he saw only
one train come in the daytime was telling a flat lie.
There are quite a few such people in Dachau.
The analysis of the anti-Nazi element of the town:
1) The people knew what was going on in the camp, even
ten years prior to liberation;
2) The town did a thriving business from the
concentration camp guard;
3) Ninety percent are guilty and have dabbed themselves
with the blood of innocent human beings;
4) The people are to blame for their cowardice; they were
all too cowardly. They didn't want to risk anything. And
that was the way it was in all of Germany.
The conclusion of this report written on Dachau written in
1945 on the liberation of the concentration camp applies
today. The conclusion is as follows:
If one is to attempt tremendous task and accept the
terrible responsibility of judging a whole town,
assessing it in mass as to collect a guilt of innocence
of all its inhabitants for their complicity in committing
this most heinous of crimes, one would do well to
remember the fearsome shadow that hangs over everyone in
this state in which crime has been incorporated and
called the government.
So you can see how the whole program is related here. My
lawsuit was against one single aspect of the total program:
The enforcement arm of the conspiracy. The people who make up
the cadre that is going to occupy the concentration camps
where enemies of the United States will be placed.
Remember Solzhenitsyn's words in the 'Gulag Archipelago':
Resistance should have began right there but it did not
begin. You aren't gagged, you really can and you really
ought to cry out that arrests are being made on the
strength of false accusations. If many such outcries had
been heard all over the city would arrests have no longer
have been so easy.
They, the tyrants, can't work in the public eye. Those people
who were so apathetic, hoping that nothing was really wrong,
that nothing would happen to their persons and property, sat
back and watched. The anarchists, financed by multinational
interests, looted and pillaged their country.
If you think that all that is necessary is to pay your house
notes, to pay your TV notes, to go vote when there is an
election, and to stand back during the rest of the year and
watch as your country and way of life are replaced by a system
in which you will be a slave in a concentration camp, you --
not the conspirators -- are guilty because you, by silent
acquiescence, invite tyranny and oppression.
And when you have to steal food to eat because our production
is for foreign use because the Dept. of Commerce, through
Executive Order 11490 and its predecessors, is responsible for
international distribution of our commodities, don't sit in
the culvert hiding and eating and wondering what happened: You
made it all possible.
When your family is split up and spread across the United
States to do slave labor and you never see your loved ones
again, it will be your fault: You did nothing to prevent it.
Once we lose our freedom we are never going to regain it. That
is why we must stand together to prevent the loss of our
freedom as citizens of the United States.
Thank you very much.
(Conclusion of taped report.)
Editors note: This provided by the folks below thru, yes, once again, Harold Thomas at http://www.halcyon.com/harold/
Liberty's Educational Advocacy Forum,
Indiana's Fully Informed Jury Association, Inc.
Not a high-tech law firm brochure.
Dr. Tavel's Self Help Clinic and Sovereign Law Library
promotes "action that raises the cost of state
violence for its perpetrators (and) that lays the basis
for institutional change " -- Noam Chomsky
"[T]he Law . . . should be accessible to every man and at all
Franz Kafka, THE TRIAL 115
(Willa & Edwin Muir trans., Schocken Books 1988)
For Liberty in Our Lifetime, R.J. Tavel, J.D.
Updated Daily by
The OtherOne Computer Consulting International, Ltd.