of the Anu Building Block

spin and breaths in and out,

they don't move from their position,

due to the close-packing of Anu.

These are not particles, spheres or visible.

It is space and it does what space does.

Since a picture is worth about 1000 words, here's 2,000 words worth:

Ben Kristoffen's theory has doubts about what takes place in the "cores" of his waveforms but The Anu Building Block Theory ^{3} can explain the "core", with understanding that the Anu is the source of de Broglie waves (7x10^-24 meter) and biologic process. Non-linear "flow" waves are interpreted as Bearden/Tesla longitudinal sound waves of space, repeating in "one dimension" called phi, or spiraling space, the seat of phi-gravity, that golden ratio condition that allows phi-space to implode into its spiral F#/Bb dual centers and also to expand space from its "core" F#/Bb dual centers.

Ben uses "phase velocity" as limited by light velocity whereas in other papers it means superluminal velocity. Ben treats "time as an additional, unidirectional parameter" and I say universe really has no "time" at all because of universe's atomic "core" renewal velocity, which is almost instant, due to de Broglie wavelengths and the communicative abilities of the 10^28 scale Anu tori associated with bio-logic process.

Additionally, I regarded J.W.Keely's ^{16} comment that "time is gravity" and that the mysterious 4th dimension is our mysterious 0th dimension, again, after cycling through 1,2,3 and 4...or 0,1,2 and 3 dimensions, by whichever numbering system suits you. The conditions of no-time or space of the 4th and 0th dimensions are just as mysterious as gravity, so my conclusion has been that mysterious gravity is the same as the mysterious 4th or 0th dimension of time.lessness and space.lessness, after eliminating all other forces and dimensions, and in this context, universe has two kinds of gravity....an inward earth-center seeking gravity and a large-scale space expanding gravity, both gravities also having almost instant renewal velocities, because both gravities are simply "what space does".

And any system will be subject to relativistic shiftings. Ben's self-organizing "wavicles" which he calls "particles", are not particles at all. They are simply the result of total wave compression of phi-space. If the structure of space were to disappear, these "particles" would also disappear, instantly

**There was no "Big Bang" and Ben's large-scale space-time curvature of 60 magnitudes greater than observed is also substantiated as the almost imperceptable-flat curve of the largest universal curve of space, itself, called The Toroidal Universe ^{5} In contrast to Ben's dilemma that universe's age is less than the oldest star age, my theory, 53 Evolution and Creation, ^{6} shows the universe's age to be far, far older than modern estimates of a mere 13.7 billion yrs.**

Neuroscience Research Institute

University of California,

Santa Barbara, CA 93106

e-mail: krogh@psych.ucsb.edu

* Real waves can transport their media.

- Flow is an essential element of many self-organizing, chaotic nonlinear systems.
- Commonly, waves transport their media, i.e., cause them to flow.
- Flow waves are inherently nonlinear, regardless of the medium in which they are found.
- Flow waves can refract and reflect each other.
- It's not unusual for nonlinear wave systems to organize themselves into repetitive structures.
- Repetitive wave structures may exhibit quantum mechanical behaviors.

***Just as sound is reflected and refracted by a stream of moving air, so too are the waves in this system, when they encounter flows.** In analyzing these effects, we'll use the approach taken for reflection by a moving mirror: First we'll use Huygens' principle to derive a law -- of
refraction here -- then we'll apply it to the behavior of pro-particles. We'll be working in just two dimensions again, for simplicity, instead of the full 4-dimensional space.

*Although the wave angles are no different with this effect, the predicted amplitudes change significantly. **What's involved is the transfer of energy between the flows and waves. Thus the waves are nonlinear.**

Premise: "the associated (phi, phase symbol) flow is proportional to the flow wave frequency"

**Now we wont find the answer to non-locality in the classical level of atoms. If we look deep into the hidden variables, the Anu tori can precess and spin at almost infinite velocity. During this cycle it may have the ability to produce a musical A note, trillions of times a second. All other Anu in the vicinity and the universe are also producing this same musical A note. All A notes can be considered as the same A note, no matter its locality or non-locality. These hidden variable A notes exist in definite states and definite trajectories...that state is the A note and the trajectory is a circular precession of each Anu tori. Within the whole system of uncountable Anu, additional potential are interacting, non-locally. The whole system is already wholly synchronized and can communicate nearly instantly.**

He writes:

I think that conventional formulations of quantum theory, and of quantum field theory in particular, are unprofessionally vague and ambiguous. Professional physicists ought to be able to do better. Bohm has shown us a way. It will be seen that all the essential results of ordinary quantum field theory are recovered. But it will be seen also that the very sharpness of the reformulation brings into focus some awkward questions. The construction of the scheme is not at all unique. And Lorentz invariance plays a strange, perhaps incredible role . . ....I am unable to prove, or even formulate clearly, the proposition that a sharp formulation of quantum field theory, such as that set out here, must disrespect serious Lorentz invariance. But it seems to me that this is probably so. As with relativity before Einstein, there is then a preferred frame in the formulation of the theory . . . but it is experimentally indistinguishable. It seems an eccentric way to make a world.

As with the Lagrangian picture in special relativity, two attitudes can be taken to the Hamiltonian formulation of relativistic mechanics. The first makes no pretense at a covariant description but instead works in some specific Lorentz or inertial frame. Time as measured in the particular Lorentz frame is then not treated on a common basis with other coordinates but serves, as in nonrelativistic mechanics, as a parameter describing the evolution of the system. Nonetheless, if the Lagrangian that leads to the Hamiltonian is itself based on a relativistically invariant physical theory, e.g., Maxwell's equations and the Lorentz force, then the resultant Hamiltonian picture will be relativistically correct. The second approach, of course, attempts a fully covariant description of the Hamiltonian picture, but the difficulties that plagued the corresponding Lagrangian approach are even fiercer here. ...there seems to be a natural route available for constructing a relativistically covariant Hamiltonian. But the route turns out to be mined with booby traps.

**REFERENCES:**

1. The Spin Wave (GIF)

99.79.16 The Enneagram

99.79.17 The Enneagram

99.79.18 The Enneagram

99.79.19 The Enneagram

© Copyright. Robert Grace. 2004