
THE RITUAL AT THE GRAMMY AWARDS 2012
Dee Finney's blog
start date July 20, 2011
Today's date February 19, 2012
page 138
TOPIC: WHITNEY HOUSTON'S DEATH
RITUAL BLOOD SACRIFICE
CONNECTION TO MICHAEL JACKSON'S DEATH
PRINCESS DIANA - RITUAL DEATH
Whitney Houston had the most beautiful funeral I've ever seen in my life. The music was incredible, and I had a beautiful vision right after Steve Wonder sang his personall rendition of Ribbon's In The Sky. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cuuu6a01As
The funeral evdiently was marred by an incident at the beginning which I did not see as I turned it on late. Evidently Whitney's ex-husband and his new family came into the church to attend the funeral and sat in the front row. For some reason he was asked to leave the church, which he did but was very upset. We proboably will not know exactly what happened in the church thought Bobby made a public statement about it later which was well said. It probably was not the whole story. Television (CNN) said he had brought nine people with him into the church that sat 300 people and there were 1500 people in attendance when he showed up.
NOTE: I did not want to write about Whitney Houston's Death and life, but apparently something odd has happened and it's starting to look like something else happened to Whitney annd it's also connected to Michael Jackson's death. See below:
The 2012 Grammy Awards took place in a horrible context: the wake of the sudden, mysterious death of Whitney Houston. The show went on nevertheless … but not without a great deal of strange symbols and events that made one thing very clear: There is a definite dark side to the entertainment business. We will look at the facts surrounding Whitney Houston’s death, the symbolic elements of the 2012 Grammy Awards (including Nikki Minaj’s ritualistic performance) and see how the ceremony turned into another mega-ritual.
	
had a feeling that in 2012 the occult agenda of the entertainment industry would be kicked in high gear. I was right: In the span of a week, the most important night in sports (the Superbowl – see the article about it here) and music (the Grammys) were infused with ritualistic elements witnessed by millions of viewers. While the Superbowl half-time show lasted only 13 minutes, the ritual surrounding the Grammys lasted for days and its aftermath is still going on as odd facts and accounts regarding Whitney Houston continue to surface in the media.
This article will list several facts and events that took place before, during and after the Grammy Awards that have a symbolic significance in the grand scheme of things. While some of the facts mentioned here might have been the result of coincidence or poor timing, they still came together in one big, classic case of synchronicity. In other words, apparent coincidences sometimes reveal an underlying pattern behind events.
“Carl Jung described synchronicity as ” the experience of two or more events that are apparently causally unrelated or unlikely to occur together by chance and that are observed to occur together in a meaningful manner. Synchronistic events reveal an underlying pattern, a conceptual framework that encompasses, but is larger than, any of the systems that display the synchronicity. Concurrent events that first appear to be coincidental but later turn out to be causally related are termed incoincident.”
RAFFLES VON EXEL LWITH WHITNEY HOUSTON
When we look at the facts and the occurrences surrounding Whitney Houston’s death coupled with the symbolic elements of the 2012 Grammy awards, the entire “event” has the looks of an occult ritual, complete with a blood sacrifice, a celebration and even a “re-birth”. Some of the things described below were pre-planned, while others were possibly just odd coincidences. However, the overwhelming and almost palpable energy emanating from the 2012 Grammys definitely made some things align in a synchronistic fashion. Let’s look at the most significant events that happened during that fateful weekend.

If you read other articles on this site, you probably noticed that everything surrounding Whitney Houston’s is astonishingly on-par with other celebrity “sacrifices”. Accounts of strange events before the death, bizarre behavior of the authorities when the death was discovered, conflicting reports, vagueness surrounding the cause of the death and, to top it off, a worrying “response” from the music industry through the Grammys. Her case followed the same pattern as several other celebrity deaths that were blamed on drugs despite many conflicting reports. As it was the case for these other celebrities, the media almost automatically launched a campaign depicting Whitney as a hopeless drug addict. Maybe she was a drug addict, but that might only be the tip of the iceberg … a symptom of the true illness that killed Whitney: the music business.
As in the cases of Michael Jackson, Amy Winehouse, Heath Ledger, Brittany Murphy and many others, bizarre events preceded and followed the death of Whitney Houston. After reviewing all of those accounts, one cannot help but wonder: Was Whitney’s death truly an accident or was it a deliberate sacrifice planned by “unseen forces”? While most media reports drum into people’s heads that “Whitney Houston = Drugs”, some sources reveal other details that might lead to other paths of thinking. Here’s Roger Friedman’s account of things that happened at the Beverly Hilton on February 11th:
Whitney’s Death: An Earlier Incident?
Whitney Houston’s death made for a long day’s journey into night at the Beverly Hilton. While the Clive Davis Grammy dinner had to proceed downstairs in the ballroom–with 800 guests already filing in as the news was breaking–Whitney remained in state, so to speak, in her fourth floor suite. She was not removed until just moments before the party ended–a little after midnight. She’d been in the suite, discovered in her bathtub. But there were many people in the suite when this happened at 3:50pm including her daughter Bobbi Kristina, her brother Gary, sister in law Pat Houston, and another player in this story — a nightlife friend who’d been guiding her around town the last few days as she was photographed in states of duress.
What you don’t know is that around 11pm, paramedics were called back to the fourth floor. Security and police raced back to the 4th floor. A medical wheelchair with restraints was brought in through the back entrance to the hotel. Bobbi Kristina “freaked out”–well, she’d been upstairs for hours with her mother’s dead body in the next room. It was understandable. The paramedics thought they were going to to have to take her to the hospital. But calm was restored. For ten minutes, though, security cleared the entire lobby of the hotel while the concert was going on inside the ballroom. I was out there at that moment, and it was one of the strangest scenes ever.
Then there’s the mysterious story of a leak that occurred the night before from Whitney’s group of suites. A man on the third floor right underneath Houston’s suite suddenly experienced water cascading into his bathroom from above at 2:30am. It wasn’t just a trickle. The man called security, then went upstairs to the fourth floor to see what was going on. He swears to me that it was Whitney’s bathtub that was overflowing. He also says that a flat screen television had been been broken–the screen was smashed. My sources at the hotel say there was a “leak” but that it wasn’t from Whitney’s room. “They [her group] have a lot of rooms up there,” says the hotel source. My source, this man, insists that he was told it was Whitney Houston’s room. It does seem to have been part of her group of rooms.
There are many mysteries here. None of them have been reported or solved by TMZ or one of the other muckracking tabloids. I know the man who had to pull Whitney out of the bathtub yesterday and attempt to give her CPR. He told me, “She was already dead. There was nothing I could do.”
More on Whitney’s death and the Grammy party follows in the next post. And believe me, dear readers, this isn’t easy. I’ve known Whitney Houston and her family for over 25 years. She was a beautiful girl with a big heart. She was full of optimism. Her mother is one of the finest people. The people who worked for and with her were devoted to her. When the shock turns to anger there will be a lot of finger pointing. But in the end, Whitney ruled her own world.
- Source: Forbes
I am not a criminal investigator and I cannot solve all of the mysteries surrounding Whitney’s death but the fact that her body was there for hours, while a pre-Grammy party was happening just below is a little off-putting. Why wasn’t it simply cancelled? Isn’t the presence of the dead body of a legendary singer in the same exact location as the party reason enough to cancel it? Was there some type of twisted thrill of partying right below Houston’s body?
In another article, Roger Friedman noted the presence of a strange “Hollywood insider” lurking around Whitney Houston that was also around Michael Jackson during his “difficult periods”. Who is that guy?
Whitney Houston’s Mystery Friend Was Also Michael Jackson’s Pal
Here’s the one person in the Whitney Houston story whose name you have not heard, and who has remained a mystery: a Dutch man from Amsterdam who goes by the name of Raffles van Exel. He is also known – in court records—as Raffles Dawson and Raffles Benson. He was on the fourth floor of the Beverly Hilton Hotel in one of Houston’s suites when she died. He appeared downstairs in the lobby shortly thereafter, wearing aviator sunglasses, sobbing.
As usual, he had an entourage in tow, including Quinton Aaron, the actor who played the football player in “The Blind Side.” Raffles, in one of his many PR Newswire releases, recently announced that he’s producing movies with Aaron. It’s just one of many ventures he announces regularly. For someone who has no obvious means of support, he is a regular on PR Newswire and You Tube. On the latter, you can find him interviewing friends of Michael Jackson. It is assumed that he sells stories to tabloids. He regularly includes names of tabloid reporters like Kevin Frazier of “The Insider” on his Tweets.
Despite the shock of Whitney’s death, Raffles still made it downstairs to Clive Davis’s party. He was dressed in formal wear, had Whitney’s tickets in his hand, and intended to sit at her table. Just inside the ballroom he was comforted by celebrities to whom he related his story—“I found Whitney.” Gayle King hugged him. Quincy Jones listened patiently to his story. A security guard told me later, “Well, he was up there.” He was also hanging around with Houston all week prior to her death. On Tuesday when she emerged from a nightclub, looking disheveled, Raffles appears in a photograph on TMZ like a deer in headlights. He is standing right behind her in a powder blue suit. On Twitter, he wrote: “STOP reading the stupid blogs.. Whitney had a great time, she looked amazing. Nothing was wrong, it was just DAMN hot in that club.”
But who is Raffles van Exel? He’s one of Hollywood’s mysteries. I first met him in 2005 hanging around the Jackson family during Michael Jackson’s child molestation trial. After Michael went abroad, Raffles was often seen with Michael’s father, Joseph Jackson. He trades on being an “insider” when there’s a scandal. No one really knows him, but he’s always where there’s action and celebrities. On the internet he claims to own a number of companies including Raffles Entertainment. He’s also been sued a couple of times, once by a partner in something called Max Records, Inc., and once by a private aviation company in Los Angeles. I spoke to the plane company and they said they can’t comment because the situation is ongoing. On Twitter he claims to be managing “my girl,” Chaka Khan. There are plenty of pictures of Raffles on the internet with celebrities. You can see him with everyone from Magic Johnson to Sandra Bullock. If ever there was a real life Zelig, he is it.
It’s not a surprise that Raffles has turned up in Whitney Houston’s story. Last October, he and Whitney and others traveled to North Carolina with Whitney’s sister in law Patricia Houston for something called a Teen Summit. It was billed as part of The Patricia Houston Foundation, an organization for which there is no official 501 c3 registration. Pat Houston, married to Whitney’s brother Gary, has been Whitney’s manager for years. (Whitney’s own foundation for children ceased functioning years ago.) She also owns a consignment shop in North Carolina, and a candle company called Marion P. Candles, with Whitney.
Look for Raffles at Whitney’s funeral tomorrow. In the old days he used to wear a yellow jacket full of black question marks—like The Riddler. On Saturday night, as he pulled in various guests to Clive Davis’s party past the velvet ropes, he was wearing a Michael Jackson-like tuxedo. He lives in West Hollywood now, but his official domicile—and where he’s been sued—is Chicago. He has not responded to countless emails and phone messages.
- Source: Forbes
Was this man instrumental in Whitney’s sacrifice? Did Whitney fall out of the good graces of the music industry elite? Was she becoming difficult to manipulate? Was she sacrificed to introduce her successor? Difficult to say, but Whitney appeared to have premonitions about her death. Some reports described her as “manic” and agitated while others state that Whitney felt that “her days were numbered”. Shortly before her death, Whitney was spotted handing singer Brandy a message whose contents remained a mystery.
What was in Whitney’s secret note to Brandy?
Singer Brandy has one of the last messages ever delivered by Whitney Houston — but she’s not telling anyone what it says.
On Feb. 9 in Los Angeles, Houston approached the younger singer as she and fellow singer Monica and mentor Clive Davis were conducting an interview with E!
A post on RyanSeacrest.com says Houston “crashed” the interview, then goes on to say “Whitney seemed a bit manic as she told Monica about swimming ‘two hours a day,’ and conspicuously handed a note to Brandy before hugging Davis.”
When E! later asked Brandy directly what the note said, she replied “I’m going to just not say what it was and just keep it to myself for my own personal reasons.” She also told the network “Whitney meant everything to me … She’s the reason that I sing.”Brandy and Houston starred in the 1997 remake of Rodgers and Hammerstein’s “Cinderella.” Brandy also is the elder sister of singer Ray J, who had reportedly dated Houston on and off over the last two years of her life. Ray J gained notoriety in 2003 when a sex tape of him with Kim Kardashian was leaked to the public.
E! has video of Houston handing the note to Brandy, and Brandy’s comments about not revealing its contents.
- Source: MSNBC
When dealing with occult rituals, numerology takes on a primordial importance. In the case of Whitney Houston, the number 11 is definitely a factor. In elite occult circles, the number 11 is a “master number” (it cannot be reduced) and, because it exceeds the number 10 (the number of perfection) by 1, it is usually associated with bad foreboding and black magic. Qabbalists associate the number 11 with transgression of the law, rebellion, war, sin, sorcery and martyrdom.
For this reason, the occult elite often associates mega-rituals involving sacrifice with the number 11. What was the massive mega-ritual of the modern times? September 11th – involving the Twin Towers. At what exact time do we “remember” WWI soldiers who sacrificed their lives for their rulers? At the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month – Veterans Day, aka Remembrance Day.
Going further than the date of her death, another link associates Whitney and her death with Lady Gaga and previous Grammy awards. As some know, Lady Gaga had close ties with fashion designer Alexander McQueen, who was no stranger to occult and mind control symbolism in his work. McQueen died on February 11th, 2010.
During the 2011 Grammy Awards, Gaga stated about her song “Born This Way”:
“I need to thank Whitney Houston. I wanted to thank Whitney, because when I wrote ‘Born this Way,’ I imagined she was singing it – because I wasn’t secure enough in myself to imagine I was a superstar. So, Whitney, I imagined you were singing ‘Born This Way’ when I wrote it.”
“Born This Way” was released on February 11th, 2011. Exactly one year later, Whitney Houston dies on February 11th, 2012. Did Gaga (or her handlers) know something that the rest of us didn’t? Her outfit evidently shows that death was on her mind.

Artists usually have their award ceremony 
	wardrobes selected well in advance. 
	Apparently, death was on Gaga's
	
(or her handler's) mind
Another little fact: Whitney’s room number was 434 – which in Qabbalistic numerology equals 11 (4+3+4).
Who is better placed than artists who have worked in the music industry for years to provide insightful takes on the death of Whitney Houston? They obviously do not hold the ultimate truth and they might just be trying to make sense of things like the rest of us, but they have first -and experience when it comes to the workings of the music industry.
During an interview on Good Morning America, industry giant Celine Dion bluntly blamed the “bad influence” of show business for Whitney’s death. She even stated that you “have to be afraid” of show business.
“It’s just really unfortunate that drugs, bad people or bad influence took over. It took over her dreams. It took over her love and motherhood. When you think about Elvis Presley and Marilyn Monroe and Michael Jackson and Amy Winehouse, to get into drugs like that, for whatever reason. Is it because of the stress and bad influence? What happens when you have everything? What happens when you have love, support, the family, motherhood? You have responsibilities of a mother and then something happens and it destroys everything. That’s why I don’t do parties and I don’t hang out. That’s why I’m not part of show business. We have to be afraid. I’ve always said you have to have fun and do music and you can never be part of show business because you don’t what it’s going to get yourself into. You have to do your work and get out of there.”
- Source: Vancouver Sun
Is Celine Dion’s avoidance of show business the reason she manages to be relatively scandal-free?
Another legendary diva, Chaka Khan, was even more direct when explaining the true cause of Whitney’s death. During an interview with Piers Morgan, she stated:
“I think we all, as artists, because we’re highly sensitive people, and this machine around us, this so-called ‘music industry,’ is such a demonic thing. It’s sacrifices people’s lives and their essences at the drop of a dime … I had a manager once say to me, ‘ You know you’re worth more money dead than alive.’
I mean, I’ve cried for her, a lot over the years, so many times. In a way 
	I’ve mourned her, because I felt something was gonna happen because she was 
	so close to the wire.”
	- Source:
	
	Eonline
Was Chaka Khan exaggerating when he used the terms "demonic" and "sacrifice" when describing the music used by the industry? Judging by the symbolism used at the Grammy awards, she was p;robably right on.!
The Mega-Ritual that Was the 2012 Grammy Awards
The Grammy Awards has been dubbed “music’s biggest night” and, since the music industry is ruled by an occult elite, “music’s biggest night” reflects this elite’s code. Because of Whitney Houston’s death, the 2012 edition of the Grammy Awards had a peculiar feel that was almost palpable through the television screen. Intentionally or not, Whitney’s death was tied-in with the awards ceremony and the symbolism that transpired from it.
The ceremony began in a very peculiar fashion, especially given the context of the Whitney’s death. Bruce Springsteen yelled to the crowd “Are you alive out there?“, then sang the song We Take Care of Our Own, a mantra that was repeated throughout the evening. Well, I know someone who was definitely not alive out there – the very person that was on everyone’s mind when the show began. And, in the last years of her life, she wasn’t particularly well taken care of, either. In fact, as I stated in the article, What Happened to Whitney Houston, I believe that something terrible happened to Whitney Houston that went way beyond using drugs. She was mentally, psychologically and even spiritually disturbed. Was she under mind control or the subject of some kind of dark rituals? Difficult to say. But, as Springsteen chanted We Take Care of Our Own as if it was the anthem of the industry, I couldn’t help but think that Whitney was probably not “one of them”. Her “industry-approved” replacement, however, is “one of them”.
"OUT WITH THE OLD, IN WITH THE NEW?
	
Whitney Houston, clive Davis, Jennifer Hudson
day before Whitney’s death, Clive Davis told Piers Morgan that Jennifer Hudson was “the next Whitney”. While Whitney was being reduced to the state of has-been, constantly humiliated by tabloid stories, Hudson was being groomed to become the next industry diva. After being discovered on American Idol, Hudson’s career took off … right after the violent murders of her mother and brother in 2008. Her first public appearance after the traumatic event was singing the Star-Spangled Banner during Superbowl XLIII.
At the 2012 Grammy Awards, who do you think was chosen to pay tribute to the fallen artist by singing her greatest hit I Will Always Love You?

In her tribute to Houston, Hudson was literally placed "in the spotlight" while a picture of Houston floated above her.
Another artist of Whitney’s calibre re-emerged triumphant, almost like a re-birth after a period of silence: Adele. However, the symbolic ceremony of the 2012 Grammy Awards could not be completed without a true ritual dealing with the spiritual realm. Nikki Minaj took care of that.
"THE BLACK MASS"
  
	
  
	sHE CLAIMS THIS IS PART OF A MOVIE SHE IS DOING.
http://music-mix.ew.com/2012/02/16/nicki-minaj-explains-grammy-performance/
Nicki Minaj enters the Grammys in a ritualistic red robe, color of sacrifice and initiation. Was it a reference to Whitney's blood sacrifice
VIDEO: SHE MENTIONS BOTH WHITNEY AND BRITNEY IN THE SONG AND AT THE END SAYS 'BREAK A LEG'.
http://www.youtube.com/user/officialnickiminaj?ob=4&feature=results_main
The Grammy Awards ceremony may have begun with a heart-felt prayer for Whitney Houston, but it ended with an all-out Satanic Black Mass. From her “red carpet” entrance to her musical performance, Nikki Minaj played the role of a woman possessed by a demon named “Roman Zolanski”. The 2012 Grammy Awards were apparently chosen to “exorcise” this demon from Nikki and to present it to the world as her new alter-ego. In last year’s Grammy Awards, Lady Gaga also presented a new persona for Born This Way: a Gaga with horns on her forehead.
In a music industry permeated with the concept of mind control, alter-personas that are completely separate from the artists are now the norm. As discussed in the article Origins and Techniques of Monarch Mind Control, the goal of Monarch programming is to create new personalities within a mind-control victim using violent trauma and frightening rituals. The personas that are created are fully programmable by their handlers and can even speak with a different accent, as is the case with Minaj’s alter persona. The chorus of Minaj’s song Roman Holiday appears to refer to the process of mind control:
here is video -roman holiday: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU9qSLyeNjk it includes BAAL worsip and an attempt by Roman''s Mmom to exorcise him.
Take your medication, Roman
	Take a short vacation, Roman
	You’ll be okay
	You need to know your station, Roman
	Some alterations on your clothes and your brain
	Take a little break, little break
	From your silencing
	There is so much you can take, you can take
	I know how bad you need a Roman holiday
Mind-control slaves are highly medicated and have their clothes (outward style) and brain “altered” by their handlers. This is accomplished by forcing the victim to dissociate from reality through intense trauma and pain: “There is so much you can take” before the mind dissociates from reality or goes on a “Roman Holiday”.
LOTS OF MIND CONTROL INFORMATION http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oGdW1zeEFPkxsAKwNXNyoA?p=site%3Agreatdreams.com%20%20MIND%20CONTROL&fr2=sb-top&fr=slv8-att
Minaj’s alter-persona is named Roman Zolanski. He has his own strange accent and is evidently the product of evil rituals. The name of this alter is inspired by movie director Roman Polanski, who produced Rosemary’s Baby, a movie about the birth of the Anti-Christ (see the article about it here). Polanski is even more famous for being charged with rape by use of drugs, perversion, sodomy, lewd and lascivious act upon a child under 14, and furnishing a controlled substance to a minor in 1977. Strange fellow to be inspired by. He is however an intricate piece in the history of the occult entertainment industry so this “tribute” to him by an industry pawn such as Minaj is not surprising.
Actual Monarch programming is accomplished using a strong undercurrent of Satanic imagery to disturb and traumatize the victim. In the case of Minaj’s performance, her alter ego was exorcised in a Satanic Black Mass – which is, in essence, a mockery and a desecration of a conventional Christian mass.
Minaj begins her performance tied up in what appears to be Catholic church. The force that possesses her is apparently too strong to hold her down though, and as the church windows explode, she is unbound. Minaj then descends into a church gone wild, complete with strippers rubbing on young priests who are attempting to pray to God (was that really necessary?).
Then, as the choir make a mockery of the classic Christian hymn O Come All Ye Faithful, a pope figure enters and makes Minaj levitate
	
This Christian mass turned into a fiery black magic ritual for the world to see.
In short, Minaj’s performance presented the world her new alter-ego who will be rapping on her next album. Her performance made it clear that Roman Zolanski is nothing less than a demon that was created with Minaj and exorcised from her through a Black Mass ritual. If the performance alone was enough to trouble some viewers, when it is put in the context of Whitney Houston’s death that happened about 24 hours beforehand (a singer that was never shy about her Christian faith), the whole thing takes on an even more troubling dimension. Ancient magicians drew on the power of blood sacrifices to carry on Black Magic rituals. With Whitney’s death still fresh in everyone’s mind, the Black Mass that was proudly presented by the 2012 Grammy Awards had all the more potency on its worldwide viewers.
THE CONCLUSION
This article presented a great number of facts and symbols that point towards the conclusion that Whitney Houston’s death may have been a blood sacrifice and that the 2012 Grammy Awards had occult ritualistic elements within it. Even if all of these events were not deliberately planned by industry handlers, they all contribute to a clear and disturbing picture of the music industry.
While Whitney Houston’s life was ending under bizarre circumstances and she was portrayed in the media as a hopeless drug addict, a new generation of Illuminati-approved artists were being placed in the spotlight. They willingly participated in the occult ritual that was the Grammy Awards and played their role in the tragic-comedy of the music industry, even if it meant losing their essence and their soul. What happens to those who don’t play along with the system or rebel against it? They disappear from the spotlight, and sometimes they disappear from this earth in less than dignified circumstances. Because, as the mantra of the 2012 Grammy Awards indicates: The elite take care of their own. And no one else.
MAIN ARTICLE FROM: http://vigilantcitizen.com/musicbusiness/whitney-houston-and-the-2012-grammy-awards-mega-ritual/
RAFFLES APPEARS
.Whitney Houston's Mystery Friend Was Also Michael Jackson's Pal
ere’s the one person in the Whitney Houston story whose name you have not heard, and who has remained a mystery: a Dutch man from Amsterdam who goes by the name of Raffles van Exel. He is also known – in court records—as Raffles Dawson and Raffles Benson. He was on the fourth floor of the Beverly Hilton Hotel in one of Houston’s suites when she died. He appeared downstairs in the lobby shortly thereafter, wearing aviator sunglasses, sobbing
As usual, he had an entourage in tow, including Quinton Aaron, the actor who played the football player in “The Blind Side.” Raffles, in one of his many PR Newswire releases, recently announced that he’s producing movies with Aaron. It’s just one of many ventures he announces regularly. For someone who has no obvious means of support, he is a regular on PR Newswire and You Tube. On the latter, you can find him interviewing friends of Michael Jackson. It is assumed that he sells stories to tabloids. He regularly includes names of tabloid reporters like Kevin Frazier of “The Insider” on his Tweets.
Despite the shock of Whitney’s death, Raffles still made it downstairs to Clive Davis’s party. He was dressed in formal wear, had Whitney’s tickets in his hand, and intended to sit at her table. Just inside the ballroom he was comforted by celebrities to whom he related his story—“I found Whitney.” Gayle King hugged him. Quincy Jones listened patiently to his story. A security guard told me later, “Well, he was up there.” He was also hanging around with Houston all week prior to her death. On Tuesday when she emerged from a nightclub, looking disheveled, Raffles appears in a photograph on TMZ like a deer in headlights. He is standing right behind her in a powder blue suit. On Twitter, he wrote: “STOP reading the stupid blogs.. Whitney had a great time, she looked amazing. Nothing was wrong, it was just DAMN hot in that club.”
But who is Raffles van Exel? He’s one of Hollywood’s mysteries. I first met him in 2005 hanging around the Jackson family during Michael Jackson’s child molestation trial. After Michael went abroad, Raffles was often seen with Michael’s father, Joseph Jackson. He trades on being an “insider” when there’s a scandal. No one really knows him, but he’s always where there’s action and celebrities. On the internet he claims to own a number of companies including Raffles Entertainment. He’s also been sued a couple of times, once by a partner in something called Max Records, Inc., and once by a private aviation company in Los Angeles. I spoke to the plane company and they said they can’t comment because the situation is ongoing. On Twitter he claims to be managing “my girl,” Chaka Khan. There are plenty of pictures of Raffles on the internet with celebrities. You can see him with everyone from Magic Johnson to Sandra Bullock. If ever there was a real life Zelig, he is it.
It’s not a surprise that Raffles has turned up in Whitney Houston’s story. Last October, he and Whitney and others traveled to North Carolina with Whitney’s sister in law Patricia Houston for something called a Teen Summit. It was billed as part of The Patricia Houston Foundation, an organization for which there is no official 501 c3 registration. Pat Houston, married to Whitney’s brother Gary, has been Whitney’s manager for years. (Whitney’s own foundation for children ceased functioning years ago.) She also owns a consignment shop in North Carolina, and a candle company called Marion P. Candles, with Whitney.
Look for Raffles at Whitney’s funeral tomorrow. In the old days he used to wear a yellow jacket full of black question marks—like The Riddler. On Saturday night, as he pulled in various guests to Clive Davis’s party past the velvet ropes, he was wearing a Michael Jackson-like tuxedo. He lives in West Hollywood now, but his official domicile—and where he’s been sued—is Chicago. He has not responded to countless emails and phone messages.
FROM: FORBES MAGAZINE ON LINE http://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerfriedman/2012/02/18/whitney-houstons-mystery-friend-was-also-michael-jacksons-pal/
	
RAFFLE VON EXEL
Hollywood, California (PRWEB) November 10, 2011
Raffles van Exel, Founder & CEO of Raffles Entertainment, and long time friend of Michael Jackson, joins Michael Jackson's sister La Toya Jackson, colleague Jack Wishna, Michael Jackson's Estate, and fans of Michael Jackson's in calling for NBC Universal and MSNBC to drop the documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor - A Fatal Friendship" that's set to air Friday, November 11, 2011.
"Michael Jackson was a tragic victim of a homicide. Michael's life was taken from him by Dr. Conrad Murray. A jury of his peers convicted Dr. Murray of Involuntary Manslaughter on November 7, 2011. During the trial, Conrad Murray had the chance to defend himself and tell his side of the story. Murray chose not to, which was his right." States Raffles van Exel. "However, it is troubling that Murray would give an interview to NBC while a court mandated gag order was in effect. Adding insult to injury, according to a report published by Radaronline.com, NBC Universal allegedly paid over 300,000.00 for the documentary that is set to air shortly. My friend, Michael Jackson can no longer defend himself against any accusations. What's being done is deplorable."
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor issued a gag order in the Trial of Dr. Conrad Murray on September 30, 2011. The gag order strictly prohibited Dr. Conrad Murray, his lawyers and anyone associated with the case to speak with media outlets. Dr. Conrad Murray conducted an interview with NBC News Correspondent Savannah Guthrie during the Involuntary Manslaughter trial.
MSNBC plans to air "Michael Jackson and the Doctor: A Fatal Friendship" on Friday, November 11th, 2011 and Monday November 14th 2011.
"I have remained silent regarding the circumstances surrounding Michael Jackson's death. But with MSNBC's decision to air this questionable documentary, I must speak out for my friend whose voice was forever silenced on June 25, 2009. I stand with the fans of Michael Jackson, whom Michael called his Army of Love." States Raffles van Exel. "These fans are requesting NBC Universal and MSNBC not to air this documentary. I ask all of Michael Jackson's friends and family to join me in support of Michael's fans and fan clubs in their pursuit of media fairness and responsibility for Michael Jackson."
About Raffles van Exel
Raffles van Exel, CEO of Raffles Entertainment, LLC, is a highly respected entertainment consultant having guided some of the world’s most acclaimed executives and celebrities: Actor Quinton Aaron from the smash hit The Blind Side with Sandra Bullock, Soul-Funk icon Chaka Khan, Peter Lamas CEO and founder of peterlamas.com, "Skin Diva" Christine Heathman of glymedplus.com, the late King of Pop Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston, Patti LaBelle, Lance Bass (Founding member of iconic pop group, N'Sync), Flavor Flav of the iconic rap group Public Enemy and of the "Flavor of Love" fame, George Benson, and the late Ray Charles. Raffles van Exel has produced for The Queen of Salsa - the late and great Celia Cruz, funk pioneer George Clinton, Sisqo, Nick Cannon, Howie Dorough (Founding member of Grammy nominated group, The Backstreet Boys), rap icon and actor Ice-T, and a host of other artists.
Dr. Conrad Murray
Cardiologist and personal physician. Dr. Conrad Murray was born February 19, 1953, in St. Andrews, Grenada. Michael Jackson hired him as a personal physician for his 2009 concert tour entitled, "This Is It." On June 25, 2009, Jackson died of acute propofol intoxication. Conrad Murray was charged with Involuntary Manslaughter in 2010. The lone charge was filed by the Los Angeles District Attorney's office in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles. Case number: SA073164
Murray was found guilty of the involuntary manslaughter of Michael Jackson on November 7, 2011. He was remanded to custody without bail to await sentencing. Sentencing will take place on November 29, 2011.
Media Contact::
pr(at)rafflesentertainment(dot)com
VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czJVJHXPDPI
another video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7NqrDLdN0A
RITUAL BLOOD SACRIFICE
THERE ARE MANY TYPES OF ORITUAL SACRIFICES - SOME HUMAN - SOME ANIMAL
HERE ARE SOME EXAMPLE - RELATED TO BOTH STAN AND REPTILIAN
sacrifice is the act of killing one or more human beings as part of a religious ritual (ritual killing). Its typology closely parallels the various practices of ritual slaughter of animals (animal sacrifice) and of religious sacrifice in general. Human sacrifice has been practised in various cultures throughout history. Victims were typically ritually killed in a manner that was supposed to please or appease gods, spirits or the deceased, for example as a propitiatory offering, or as a retainer sacrifice when the King's servants are killed in order for them to continue to serve their master in the next life. Closely related practices found in some tribal societies are cannibalism and headhunting. By the Iron Age, with the associated developments in religion (the Axial Age), human sacrifice was becoming less common throughout the Old World, and came to be widely looked down upon as barbaric already in pre-modern times (Classical Antiquity). Blood libel is a false charge of ritual killing.
Even if not explicitly connected with religion, infliction of capital punishment has been described as a form of ritual human sacrifice.[1] Death by burning historically has aspects of both human sacrifice (Wicker Man, Tophet) and capital punishment (Brazen bull, tunica molesta). Detractors of the death penalty may consider all forms of capital punishment as secularised variants of human sacrifice.[2] Similarly, lynching, pogroms and genocides are sometimes interpreted as human sacrifice following Theodor W. Adorno.[3]
In modern times, even the once ubiquitous practice of animal sacrifice has virtually disappeared from all major religions (or has been re-cast in terms of ritual slaughter), and human sacrifice has become extremely rare. Most religions condemn the practice, and present-day secular laws treat it as murder. In the context of a society which condemns human sacrifice, the term ritual murder is used.
Similar killings for the purpose of ritual are still occasionally seen, with reports from the 2000s from Sub-Saharan Africa (muti killings), but also isolated cases in the immigrant African diaspora in Europe.[4][5] In India, Sati, the immolation of a widow on her husband's funeral pyre, continued well into the 19th century, but in current practice has become very rare.
The idea of human sacrifice has its roots in deep prehistory,[6] in the evolution of human behaviour. Mythologically, it is closely connected, or even fundamentally identical with animal sacrifice. Walter Burkert has argued for such a fundamental identity of animal and human sacrifice in the connection of a hunting hypothesis which traces the emergence of human religious behaviour to the beginning of behavioural modernity in the Upper Paleolithic (roughly 50,000 years ago).
There has been a lot of debate on the primacy of myth vs. ritual, and the presence of a myth of human sacrifice should not be taken as necessarily implying the historical existence of the actual practice: human sacrifice may be taken as the re-enactment of an older myth, or conversely a myth can be taken as a memory of an earlier practice of human sacrifice. Theistic rationalisations of human sacrifice may involve the idea of offering to deities as payment for favourable interventions in an event of special importance, to forestall unfavourable events, or to purchase disclosures about the physical world.[citation needed]
Human sacrifice can also have the intention of winning the gods' favour in warfare. In Homeric legend, Iphigeneia was to be sacrificed by her father Agamemnon for success in the Trojan War. According to the Bible, Jephthah vowed to sacrifice his daughter, though it is not said whether he went through with it or not(Judges 11).[9][10] Another motivation for human sacrifice is burial: in some notions of an afterlife, the deceased will benefit from victims killed at his funeral. Mongols, Scythians, early Egyptians and various Mesoamerican chiefs could take most of their household, including servants and concubines, with them to the next world. This is sometimes called a "retainer sacrifice", as the leader's retainers would be sacrificed along with their master, so that they could continue to serve him in the afterlife.
Another purpose is divination from the body parts of the victim. According to Strabo, Celts stabbed a victim with a sword and divined the future from his death spasms.[11]
Headhunting is the practice of taking the head of a killed adversary, for ceremonial or magical purposes, or for reasons of prestige. It was found in many pre-modern tribal societies.
Human sacrifice may be a ritual practised in a stable society, and may even be conductive to enhance societal bonds (see Sociology of religion), both by creating a bond unifying the sacrificing community, and in combining human sacrifice and capital punishment, by removing individuals that have a negative effect on societal stability (criminals, religious heretics, foreign slaves or prisoners of war). But outside of civil religion, human sacrifice may also result in outbursts of "blood frenzy" and mass killings that destabilise society. Thus, the Thuggee cult that plagued India was devoted to Kali, the goddess of death and destruction.[12][13] According to the Guinness Book of Records the Thuggee cult was responsible for approximately 2 million deaths. The bursts of capital punishment during European witch-hunts, or during the French Revolutionary Reign of Terror show similar sociological patterns (see also Moral panic).
Many cultures show traces of prehistoric human sacrifice in their mythologies, but have ceased to practise them before the onset of historical records. The story of Abraham and Isaac (Genesis 22) is an example of a myth explaining the abolition of human sacrifice. Similarly, the Vedic Purushamedha, literally "human sacrifice", is already a purely symbolic act in its earliest attestation. According to Pliny the Elder, human sacrifice in Ancient Rome was abolished by a senatorial decree in 97 BCE, although by this time the practice had already become so rare that the decree was mostly a symbolic act. Human sacrifice once abolished is typically replaced by either animal sacrifice, or by the "mock-sacrifice" of effigies, such as the Argei in ancient Rome.
There may be evidence of retainer sacrifice in the early dynastic period at Abydos, when on the death of a King he would be accompanied with servants, and possibly high officials, who would continue to serve him in eternal life. The skeletons that were found had no obvious signs of trauma, leading to speculation that the giving up of life to serve the King may have been a voluntary act, possibly carried out in a drug induced state. At about 2800 BCE any possible evidence of such practices disappeared, though echoes are perhaps to be seen in the burial of statues of servants in Old Kingdom tombs.[14][15]
Retainer sacrifice was practised within the royal tombs of ancient Mesopotamia. Courtiers, guards, musicians, handmaidens and grooms died, presumed to have taken poison.[16][17] A new examination of skulls from the royal cemetery at Ur, discovered in Iraq almost a century ago, appears to support a more grisly interpretation than before of human sacrifices associated with elite burials in ancient Mesopotamia, archaeologists say. Palace attendants, as part of royal mortuary ritual, were not dosed with poison to meet a rather serene death. Instead, a sharp instrument, a pike perhaps, was driven into their heads.[18]
References in the Bible point to an awareness of human sacrifice in the history of ancient near-eastern practice. During a battle with the Israelites the king of Moab gives his firstborn son and heir as a whole burnt offering (olah, as used of the Temple sacrifice) (2 Kings 3:27).[19]
In Genesis 22 as well as the Qur'an, there is a story about Abraham's binding of Isaac, although in the Qur'an the name of the son is not mentioned and assumed to be Ismail. In the Bible's version of the story, God tests Abraham by asking him to present his son, Isaac, as a sacrifice on Mount Moriah. No reason is given within the text. Abraham agrees to this command without arguing. The story ends with an angel stopping Abraham at the last minute and making Isaac's sacrifice unnecessary by providing a ram, caught in some nearby bushes, to be sacrificed instead. Many Bible scholars have suggested this story's origin was a remembrance of an era when human sacrifice was abolished in favour of animal sacrifice.[20][21]
Another instance of human sacrifice mentioned in the Bible is the sacrifice of Jephthah's daughter in Judges 11. Jephthah vows to sacrifice to God whatsoever comes to greet him at the door when he returns home if he is victorious. The vow is stated in Judges 11:31 as "Then it shall be, that whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall surely be the Lord's, and I will offer it up for a burnt offering." When he returns from battle, his virgin daughter runs out to greet him. According to the commentators of the rabbinic Jewish tradition, Jepthah's daughter was not sacrificed, but was forbidden to marry and remained a spinster her entire life, fulfilling the vow that she would be devoted to the Lord.[22]
According to Roman and Greek sources, Phoenicians and Carthaginians sacrificed infants to their gods. The bones of numerous infants have been found in Carthaginian archaeological sites in modern times but the subject of child sacrifice is controversial.[23] In a single child cemetery called the Tophet by archaeologists, an estimated 20,000 urns were deposited.[24]
Plutarch (ca. 46–120 CE) mentions the practice, as do Tertullian, Orosius, Diodorus Siculus and Philo. Livy and Polybius do not. The Bible asserts that children were sacrificed at a place called the Tophet ("roasting place") to the god Moloch. According to Diodorus Siculus' account of the Carthagians:[25]
| “ | There was in their city a bronze image of Cronus extending its hands, palms up and sloping toward the ground, so that each of the children when placed thereon rolled down and fell into a sort of gaping pit filled with fire. | ” | 
	Plutarch, however claims that the children were already dead at the time, 
	having been killed by their parents, whose consent—as well as that of the 
	children—was required; Tertullian explains the acquiescence of the children 
	as a product of their youthful trustfulness.[25]
The accuracy of such stories is disputed by some modern historians and archaeologists.[26]
There is archaeological evidence of human sacrifice in Neolithic to Eneolithic Europe. Retainer sacrifices seem to have been common in early Indo-European religion. For example, the Luhansk sacrificial site shows evidence of human sacrifice in the Yamna culture.
Allusions to human sacrifice are found in classical mythology. The deus ex machina salvation in some versions of Iphigeneia (who was about to be sacrificed by her father Agamemnon) and her replacement with a deer by the goddess Artemis, may be a vestigial memory of the abandonment and discrediting of the practice of human sacrifice among the Greeks in favour of animal sacrifice. Many scholars have suggested a possible analogy with the story of Isaac's attempted sacrifice by his father Abraham in the Bible, which was also stopped at the last minute (though it had first been encouraged) by divine intervention.
The Romans practised various forms of human sacrifice; from Etruscans (or, according to other sources, Sabellians), they adopted the original form of gladiatorial combat where the victim was slain in a ritual battle. During the early republic, criminals who had broken their oaths or defrauded others were sometimes "given to the gods" (that is, executed as a human sacrifice). The Rex Nemorensis was an escaped slave who became priest of the goddess Diana at Nemi by killing his predecessor. Prisoners of war were buried alive as offerings to Manes and Di Inferi (gods of the underworld). Archaeologists have found sacrificial victims buried in building foundations. Ordinarily, deceased Romans were cremated rather than buried. Captured enemy leaders, after the victorious general's triumph, would be ritually strangled in front of a statue of Mars, the war god. Dionysius of Halicarnassus[27] refers to a sacrifice of Argei in the Vestal ritual that might have originally included sacrifice of old men. According to Pliny the Elder, human sacrifice was formally banned during the consulship of Publius Licinius Crassus and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in 97 BCE, although by this time it was so rare that the decree was largely symbolic.[28] Most of the rituals turned to animal sacrifice like taurobolium or became merely symbolic. A Roman general might bury a statue of his likeness to thank the gods for victory. However, activities with a ritual origin and similarities to human sacrifice, such as the gladiatorial games and some forms of execution, continued for many years, and grew in popularity.
According to Roman sources, Celtic Druids engaged extensively in human sacrifice.[29] According to Julius Caesar, the slaves and dependents of Gauls of rank would be burnt along with the body of their master as part of his funerary rites.[30] He also describes how they built wicker figures that were filled with living humans and then burned.[31] It is known that druids at least supervised sacrifices of some kind. According to Cassius Dio, Boudica's forces impaled Roman captives during her rebellion against the Roman occupation, to the accompaniment of revelry and sacrifices in the sacred groves of Andate.[32] Different gods reportedly required different kinds of sacrifices. Victims meant for Esus were hanged, those meant for Taranis immolated and those for Teutates drowned. Some, like the Lindow Man, may have gone to their deaths willingly.
Archaeological evidence from the British Isles seems to indicate that human sacrifice may have been practised, over times long pre-dating any contact with Rome. Human remains have been found at the foundations of structures from the Neolithic time to the Roman era, with injuries and in positions that argue for their being foundation sacrifices.[citation needed]
Skeletons belonging to as many as 150 people and dating back to about the time of the Roman conquest were discovered in Alveston, England. Druids may have killed the victims in a single event.[33]
Ritualised decapitation survives in the archaeological record such as the example of 12 headless corpses at the French late Iron Age sanctuary of Gournay-sur-Aronde.[34]
Human sacrifice was not a particularly common occurrence among the Germanic peoples, being resorted to in exceptional situations arising from crises of an environmental (crop failure, drought, famine) or social (war) nature, often thought to derive at least in part from the failure of the king to establish and/or maintain prosperity and peace (árs ok friðar) in the lands entrusted to him.[35] In later Scandinavian practice, human sacrifice appears to have become more institutionalised, and was repeated as part of a larger sacrifice on a periodic basis (according to Adam of Bremen every nine years).[36]
Evidence of Germanic practices of human sacrifice predating the Viking Age depend on archaeology and on a few scattered accounts in Greco-Roman ethnography. For example, Tacitus reports Germanic human sacrifice to (what he interprets as) Mercury, and to Isis specifically among the Suebians. Jordanes reports how the Goths sacrificed prisoners of war to Mars, suspending the severed arms of the victims from the branches of trees.
By the 10th century, Germanic paganism had become restricted to Scandinavia. One account by Ahmad ibn Fadlan as part of his account of an embassy to the Volga Bulgars in 921 claims that Norse warriors were sometimes buried with enslaved women with the belief that these women would become their wives in Valhalla. In his description of the funeral of a Scandinavian chieftain, a slave volunteers to die with a Norseman. After ten days of festivities, she is stabbed to death by an old woman, a sort of priestess who is referred to as Völva or "Angel of Death", and burnt together with the deceased in his boat. This practice is evidenced archaeologically, with many male warrior burials (such as the ship burial at Balladoole on the Isle of Man, or that at Oseberg in Norway[37]) also containing female remains with signs of trauma.
According to Adémar de Chabannes, just before his death in 932 or 933 Rollo (founder and first ruler of the Viking principality of Normandy) practised human sacrifices to appease the pagan gods, and at the same time made gifts to the churches in Normandy.[38]
Adam von Bremen recorded human sacrifices to Odin in 11th-century Sweden, at the Temple at Uppsala, a tradition which is confirmed by Gesta Danorum and the Norse sagas. According to the Ynglinga saga, king Domalde was sacrificed there in the hope of bringing greater future harvests and the total domination of all future wars. The same saga also relates that Domalde's descendant king Aun sacrificed nine of his own sons to Odin in exchange for longer life, until the Swedes stopped him from sacrificing his last son, Egil.
Heidrek in the Hervarar saga agrees to the sacrifice of his son in exchange for the command over a fourth of the men of Reidgotaland. With these, he seizes the entire kingdom and prevents the sacrifice of his son, dedicating those fallen in his rebellion to Odin instead.
According to sixth century Byzantine emperor Mauricius's Strategikon wrote of the Slavs[39]:
| “ | They don't hold their prisoners indefinitely, like other people, but, limiting their time as prisoners, offer them a choice: either to ransom their way back to home or to stay where they are, as free man and friends.[40] | ” | 
	In the 10th century, Persian explorer
	
	Ahmad ibn Rustah described funerary rights for the Rus included the 
	sacrifice of a young female slave.[41]
	
	Leo the Deacon describes prisoner sacrifice by the Rus lead by
	
	Sviatoslav during the
	
	Russo-Byzantine War "in accordance with their ancestral custom."[42]
According to the 12th century Russian Primary Chronicle, prisoners of war were sacrificed to the supreme Slavic deity Perun. Sacrifices to pagan gods, along with paganism itself, were banned after the Baptism of Rus by Prince Vladimir I in the 980s.[43]
Archeological findings indicate that the practice may have been widespread, at least among slaves, judging from mass graves containing the cremated fragments of a number of different people.[41]
The ancient Chinese are known to have made sacrifices of young men and women to river deities, and to have buried slaves alive with their owners upon death as part of a funeral service. This was especially prevalent during the Shang and Zhou Dynasties. During the Warring States period, Ximen Bao of Wei demonstrated to the villagers that sacrifice to river deities was actually a ploy by crooked priests to pocket money.[44] In Chinese lore, Ximen Bao is regarded as a folk hero who pointed out the absurdity of human sacrifice.
The sacrifice of a high-ranking male's slaves, concubines or servants upon his death (called Xun Zang 殉葬 or more specifically Sheng Xun 生殉) was a more common form. The stated purpose was to provide companionship for the dead in the afterlife. In earlier times the victims were either killed or buried alive, while later they were usually forced to commit suicide.
Funeral human sacrifice was abolished by the Qin Dynasty in 384 BCE.[citation needed][dubious ] Afterwards it became relatively rare throughout the central parts of China. However, the Hongwu Emperor of the Ming Dynasty revived it in 1395 when his second son died and two of the prince's concubines were sacrificed. In 1464, the Zhengtong Emperor in his will forbade the practice for Ming emperors and princes.
Human sacrifice was also practised by the Manchus. Following Nurhaci's death, his wife, Lady Abahai, and his two lesser consorts committed suicide. During the Qing Dynasty, sacrifice of slaves was banned by the Kangxi Emperor in 1673.
Human sacrifice, including cannibalism, was thought practiced in Tibet prior to the arrival of Buddhism in the 7th century.[45]
The prevalence of human sacrifice in medieval Buddhist Tibet is less clear. The Lamas, as professing Buddhists, could not condone blood sacrifices, and they replaced the human victims with effigies made from dough. This replacement of human victims with effigies is attributed to Padmasambhava, a Tibetan saint of the mid 8th century, in Tibetan tradition.[citation needed]
Nevertheless, there is some evidence that outside of lamaism, there were practices of tantric human sacrifice which survived throughout the medieval period, and possibly into modern times. The 15th-century Blue Annals, a seminal document of Tibetan Buddhism, reports upon how in Tibet the so-called "18 robber-monks" slaughtered men and women for their tantric ceremonies.[46] Such practices of human sacrifice as there was in medieval Tibet was mostly replaced by animal sacrifice, or the self-infliction of wounds in religious ritual, by the 20th century[citation needed]. A systematic survey of evidence for human sacrifice in 20th-century Tibet turns up three instances:
Based on this evidence, Grunfeld (1996) concludes that it cannot be ruled out that isolated instances of human sacrifice did survive in remote areas of Tibet until the mid 20th century, but they must have been rare enough to have left no more traces than the evidence cited above.[49]
The earliest evidence for human sacrifice in the Indian subcontinent dates back to the Bronze Age Indus Valley Civilization. An Indus seal from Harappa depicts an upside-down nude female figure with legs outspread and a plant issuing from the womb. The reverse side of the seal depicts a man holding a sickle and a woman seated on the ground in a posture of prayer. Many scholars interpret this scene as a human sacrifice in honor of the Mother-Goddess.[50][51][52][53]
Regarding possible Vedic mention of human sacrifice, the prevailing 19th-century view, associated above all with Henry Colebrooke, was that human sacrifice had little scriptural warrant, and did not actually take place. Those verses which referred to purushamedha were meant to be read symbolically[54] or as a "priestly fantasy". However, Rajendralal Mitra published a defence of the thesis that human sacrifice, as had been practised in Bengal, was a continuation of traditions dating back to Vedic periods.[55] Hermann Oldenberg held to Colebrooke's view; but Jan Gonda underlined its disputed status.
Human and animal sacrifice became less common during the post-Vedic period, as ahimsa (non-violence) became part of mainstream religious thought. This may correspond to the impact of Sramanic religions such as Buddhism and Jainism. The Chandogya Upanishad (3.17.4) includes ahimsa in its list of virtues.[54]
It was agreed even by Colebrooke, however, that by the Puranic period—at least at the time of the writing of the Kalika-Purana, human sacrifice was accepted. The Kalika Purana was composed in Northeast India in the 11th century. The text states that blood sacrifice is only permitted when the country is in danger and war is expected. According to the text, the performer of a sacrifice will obtain victory over his enemies.[54] In the medieval period, it became increasingly common. In the 7th century, Banabhatta, in a description of the dedication of a temple of Chandika, describes a series of human sacrifices; similarly, in the 9th century, Haribhadra describes the sacrifices to Chandika in Orissa.[56] It was "more common" in South India. The town of Kuknur in North Karnataka there exists an ancient Kali temple, built around the 8-9th century AD, which has a history of human sacrifices.[56]
Human sacrifices were carried out in connection with the worship of Shakti until approximately the early modern period, and in Bengal perhaps as late as the early 19th century.[57] Although not accepted by larger section of Hindu culture, certain tantric cults performed human sacrifice until around the same time, both actual and symbolic; it was a highly ritualised act, and on occasion took many months to complete.[57]
Verse 19 of the Karpuradistotram (Hymn to Kali) lists humans as one of the species that are acceptable for sacrifice to the goddess. However, in 1922, Sir John George Woodroffe published a commentary on the Karpuradistotram by the Kaula commentator Swami Vimalananda. In it, he writes that the sacrificial animals listed in verse 19 are merely symbols for the six enemies, with "man" representing pride. He also states that the age of material sacrifice had long since passed away.[58]
The Khonds, 
	an aboriginal 
	tribe of India, inhabiting the tributary states of
	Orissa and
	
	Andhra Pradesh, became notorious, on the British occupation of their 
	district about 1835, from the prevalence and cruelty of the human sacrifices 
	they practised.[59]
			
		
	
	 The
	
	Deori community has a notable culture and tradition which is a hidden 
	treasure for the sociologists. The Deoris represent the class “priest”-a 
	section of the whole Chutia community (now in Assam, India). In the first 
	two decades of 13th century, before arrival of the
	Ahom. Deori's 
	use to make a Narbali (human sacrifice) in terms to win the war, battle and 
	to prevent the villagers from the evil atmosphere like floods, drought etc. 
	This practice make them pure owing to satisfy the supreme Goddess. Only the 
	class of Patorganya people were eligible for sacrificing.[60] In
	
	Ancient Hawaii, a
	luakini 
	temple, or luakini
	heiau, was a
	
	Native Hawaiian sacred place where human and animal blood sacrifices 
	were offered. Kauwa, the outcast or slave class, were often used as 
	human sacrifices at the luakini heiau. They are believed to have been
	war 
	captives, or the descendents of war captives. They were not the only 
	sacrifices; law-breakers of all castes or defeated political opponents were 
	also acceptable as victims.[61][62] Some of the most famous forms of ancient human sacrifice were performed 
	by various
	
	Pre-Columbian civilizations in the
	Americas[63] 
	that included the sacrifice of prisoners as well as voluntary sacrifice. 
	Friar Marcus de Nica (1539) writing of the "Chichimecas": 
	that from time to time "they of this valley cast lots whose luck (honour) it 
	shall be to be sacrificed, and they make him great cheer, on whom the lot 
	falls, and with great joy they crown him with flowers upon a bed prepared in 
	the said ditch all full of flowers and sweet herbs, on which they lay him 
	along, and lay great store of dry wood on both sides of him, and set it on 
	fire on either part, and so he dies" and "that the victim took great 
	pleasure" in being sacrificed.[64] The
	
	Mixtec players of the
	
	Mesoamerican ballgame were sacrificed when the game was used to resolve 
	a dispute between cities. The rulers would play a game instead of going to 
	battle. The losing ruler would be sacrificed. The ruler "Eight Deer" was 
	considered a great ball player and won several cities this way, until he 
	lost a ball game and was sacrificed.[citation 
	needed] The
	
	Maya held the belief that
	cenotes or 
	limestone sinkholes were portals to the underworld and sacrificed human 
	beings and tossed them down the cenote to please the water god
	Chaac. The 
	most notable example of this is the "Sacred 
	Cenote" at
	
	Chichén Itzá where extensive excavations have recovered the remains of 
	42 individuals, half of them under twenty years old. Only in the
	
	Post-Classic era did this practice become as frequent as in central 
	Mexico.[65] 
	In the Post-Classic period, the victims and the altar are represented as 
	daubed in a hue now known as
	Maya Blue, 
	obtained from the
	añil 
	plant and the clay mineral
	
	palygorskite.[66] The Aztecs 
	were particularly noted for practicing human sacrifice on a large scale; an 
	offering to
	
	Huitzilopochtli would be made to restore the blood he lost, as the sun 
	was engaged in a daily battle. Human sacrifices would prevent the end of the 
	world that could happen on each cycle of 52 years. In the 1487 
	re-consecration of the
	
	Great Pyramid of Tenochtitlan some estimate that 80,400 prisoners were 
	sacrificed[67][68] 
	though numbers are difficult to quantify as all obtainable Aztec texts were 
	destroyed by Christian missionaries during the period 1528–1548.[69] According to
	Ross 
	Hassig, author of Aztec Warfare, "between 10,000 and 80,400 
	people" were sacrificed in the ceremony. The old reports of numbers 
	sacrificed for special feasts have been described as "unbelievably high" by 
	some authors[69] 
	and that on cautious reckoning, based on reliable evidence, the numbers 
	would have been in the hundreds for yearly feasts in Tenochtitlan.[69] 
	The real number of sacrificed victims during the 1487 consecration is 
	unknown. Michael Harner, in his 1997 article The Enigma of Aztec Sacrifice, 
	estimates the number of persons sacrificed in central Mexico in the 15th 
	century as high as 250,000 per year.
	
	Fernando de Alva Cortés Ixtlilxochitl, a Mexica descendant and the 
	author of 
	
	Codex Ixtlilxochitl, claimed that one in five children of the Mexica 
	subjects was killed annually.
	
	Victor Davis Hanson argues that an estimate by Carlos Zumárraga of 
	20,000 per annum is more plausible. Other scholars believe that, since the 
	Aztecs always tried to intimidate their enemies, it is more likely that they 
	could have inflated the number as a
	
	propaganda tool.[70][71] Tlaloc 
	would require weeping boys in the first months of the
	
	Aztec calendar to be ritually murdered.
			 Sacrifices to
	Xipe 
	Totec were bound to a post and shot full of arrows. The dead victim 
	would be skinned and a priest would use the skin. Earth mother
	
	Teteoinnan required
	flayed 
	female victims. The
	
	Pawnee practised an annual
	
	Morning Star Ceremony, which included the sacrifice of a young girl. 
	Though the ritual continued, the sacrifice was discontinued in the 19th 
	century.[72] 
	The 
	Iroquois are said to have occasionally sent a maiden to the Great 
	Spirit.[73] The
	
	Southern Cult or
	
	Mound Builders, of the Southeastern United States may have also 
	practised human sacrifice, as some artifacts have been interpreted as 
	depicting such acts.[74] 
	Early European explorers reported witnessing mass human sacrifices.[75] The torture of war captives by the tribes of the Eastern Woodlands 
	cultural region also seems to have had sacrificial motivations. See
	
	Captives in American Indian Wars In common with all known
	Bronze 
	Age civilisations the Incas practised human sacrifice, especially at 
	great festivals or royal funerals where retainers died to accompany the dead 
	into the next life.[76] 
	The Moche of 
	Northern Peru 
	sacrificed teenagers en masse, as archaeologist Steve Bourget found when he 
	uncovered the bones of 42 male adolescents in 1995.[77] The study of the images seen in Moche art has enabled researchers to 
	reconstruct the culture's most important ceremonial sequence, which began 
	with ritual combat and culminated in the sacrifice of those defeated in 
	battle. Dressed in fine clothes and adornments, armed warriors faced each 
	other in ritual combat. In this hand-to-hand encounter the aim was to remove 
	the opponent's headdress rather than kill him. The object of the combat was 
	the provision of victims for sacrifice. The vanquished were stripped and 
	bound, after which they were led in procession to the place of sacrifice. 
	The captives are portrayed as strong and sexually potent. In the temple, the 
	priests and priestesses would prepare the victims for sacrifice. The 
	sacrificial methods employed varied, but at least one of the victims would 
	be bled to death. His blood was offered to the principal deities in order to 
	please and placate them.[78] The
	Inca 
	of Peru also made human sacrifices. As many as 4,000 servants, court 
	officials, favorites, and concubines were killed upon the death of the Inca
	
	Huayna Capac in 1527, for example.[79] 
	A number of mummies of sacrificed children have been recovered in the Inca 
	regions of
	
	South America, an ancient practice known as
	
	capacocha. The Incas performed
	
	child sacrifices during or after important events, such as the death of 
	the Sapa 
	Inca (emperor) or during a
	famine.[77] Human sacrifice was common in West African states up to and during the 
	19th century. The
	
	Annual customs of Dahomey was the most notorious example, but sacrifices 
	were carried out all along the West African coast and further inland. 
	Sacrifices were particularly common after the death of a King or Queen, and 
	there are many recorded cases of hundreds or even thousands of slaves being 
	sacrificed at such events. Sacrifices were particularly common in
	Dahomey, 
	in the
	
	Benin Empire, in what is now
	Ghana, and in 
	the small independent states in what is now southern
	Nigeria. 
	According to
	
	R. J. Rummel, "Just consider the Grand Custom in Dahomey: When a ruler 
	died, hundreds, sometimes even thousands, of prisoners would be slain. In 
	one of these ceremonies in 1727, as many as 4,000 were reported killed. In 
	addition, Dahomey had an
	
	Annual Custom during which 500 prisoners were sacrificed."[80] In the northern parts of West Africa, human sacrifice had become rare 
	early as Islam became more established in these areas such as the
	
	Hausa States. Human sacrifice was officially banned in the remainder of 
	West African states only by coercion, or in some cases
	
	annexation, by either the British or French. An important step was the 
	British coercing the powerful
	Egbo 
	secret society to oppose human sacrifice in 1850. This society was powerful 
	in a large number of states in what is now south-eastern
	Nigeria. 
	Nonetheless, human sacrifice continued, normally in secret, until West 
	Africa came under firm colonial control. The 
	
	Leopard men were a West African secret society active into mid-1900s 
	that practised
	
	cannibalism. In theory, the ritual cannibalism would strengthen both 
	members of the society as well as their entire tribe.[81] 
	In 
	Tanganyika, the Lion men committed an estimated 200 murders in a 
	single three-month period.[82] Current religious thinking views the 
	
	Akedah as central to the replacement of human sacrifice; while some 
	Talmudic scholars assert the replacement was the sacrifice of animals at the 
	Temple—using Exodus 13:2–12f; 22:28f; 34:19f; Numeri 3:1ff; 18:15; 
	Deuteronomy 15:19—others view that as superseded by the symbolic 
	
	pars-pro-toto sacrifice of
	
	circumcision. Leviticus 20:2 and Deuteronomy 18:10 specifically outlaw 
	the giving of children to
	Moloch, 
	making it punishable by stoning; the
	Tanakh 
	subsequently denounces human sacrifice as barbaric customs of
	Baal 
	worshippers (e.g. Psalms 106:37ff). Judges chapter 11 contains a story in which a Judge named
	Jephthah 
	makes a vow to God to sacrifice the first thing that comes out of the door 
	of his house in exchange for God's help with a military battle against the 
	Ammonites. Much to his dismay, his only daughter greeted him upon his 
	triumphant return. Judges 11:39 states that Jephthah kept his vow. According 
	to the
	
	commentators of the rabbinic Jewish tradition, Jepthah's daughter was 
	not sacrificed, but was forbidden to marry and remained a spinster her 
	entire life, fulfilling the vow that she would be devoted to the Lord.[22] 
	The 1st-century CE Jewish historian
	
	Flavius Josephus, however, understood this to mean that Jephthah burned 
	his daughter on Yahweh's altar, 
	[83] whilst
	
	pseudo-Philo, late first century CE, wrote that Jephthah offered his 
	daughter as a burnt offering because he could find no sage in Israel who 
	would cancel his vow.[citation 
	needed] In the Christian religion the belief developed that the story of
	
	Isaac's binding and of
	
	Jepthah's virgin daughter were foreshadowing for the sacrifice of
	Jesus, whose 
	sacrifice and resurrection allowed the sins of mankind to be washed away. 
	There is a tradition that the site of the
	
	binding of Isaac,
	Moriah, was 
	also the city of Jesus's future crucifixion.[84] The beliefs of most denominations of Christianity hinge upon the
	
	substitutionary atonement of the sacrifice of Jesus, which is necessary 
	for access to paradise in the afterlife. In these belief systems each 
	individual person must participate in, and/or receive the benefits of, this 
	sacrifice for the atonement of their sins. Early Christian sources 
	explicitly described this event as a sacrificial offering, with Jesus in the 
	role of both 
	priest and victim, although starting with the
	
	Enlightenment, some writers, such as
	John 
	Locke, have disputed the model of Jesus' death as a propitiatory 
	sacrifice.[85]
	
	Eastern Orthodox and
	
	Roman Catholic Christians believe that this sacrifice is made present, 
	notwithstanding the limitations of place and time, in the
	sacrament 
	of the 
	Eucharist. In this faith tradition, bread and wine, offered in a
	liturgical 
	ritual,
	
	transforms into the "Real 
	Presence," i.e. the literal Body and Blood of
	
	Jesus Christ while retaining the appearance of bread and wine. Receiving 
	(i.e. eating and drinking) the Eucharist is a central part of the religious 
	life of Catholic and Orthodox Christians.[86][87] 
	Many
	
	Protestant traditions do not share the belief in the Real Presence but 
	otherwise are varied; for example, they may believe that in the bread and 
	wine, Christ is present only spiritually, not in the sense of a change in 
	substance (Methodism)[88] 
	or that the bread and wine of communion are a merely symbolic reminder (Baptist 
	faith).[89] 
	Although early Christians in the Roman Empire were accused of being 
	cannibals,[90] 
	practices such as human sacrifice were abhorrent to them.[91] The
	
	Qur'an strongly condemns human sacrifice, as a "grave error and sinful 
	act"[92] 
	and an "ignorant, foolish act of those that have gone astray",[93] 
	and speaks of how the "heathens were deluded by their deities to kill their 
	own children".[93] Many traditions of
	
	Eastern religions (Buddhism 
	and Jainism) 
	embrace the doctrine of 
	ahimsa 
	(non-violence) which imposes
	
	vegetarianism and outlaws animal as well as human sacrifice. In the case of Buddhism, both bhikkhus (monks) and bhikkhunis 
	(nuns) were forbidden to take life in any form as part of the
	monastic code, 
	while non-violence was promoted among laity through encouragement of the
	
	Five Precepts. Across the Buddhist world both meat and alcohol are 
	strongly discouraged as offerings to a Buddhist altar, with the former being 
	synonymous with sacrifice, and the latter a violation of the Five Precepts. In 
	Hinduism, the principle of ahimsa was prescribed as early as in 
	the
	
	Maurya period 
	
	Manu Smrti. The same text, however, also exempts religious sacrifice 
	from the notion of "violence" since the victim of the sacrifice was taken to 
	benefit from the act as it would be reborn in a higher position.[94] In modern Hinduism slaughter according to the rituals permitted in the 
	Puranic scriptures has virtually disappeared. In the 19th and 20th 
	centuries, prominent figures of Indian spirituality such as
	
	Swami Vivekananda,[95]
	
	Ramana Maharshi,[96]
	
	Swami Sivananda[97] 
	and
	
	A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami[98] 
	emphasised the importance of ahimsa. Allegations of human sacrifice have been made against the
	Jews generally 
	in the form of accusations of
	
	child cannibalism or desecrating the
	eucharist. 
	Groups that have had such accusations leveled against them include
	
	blood libel against the Jews by
	Apion in the 
	30s CE,[99]
	
	Christians in the Roman empire later allegations of a
	
	Jewish conspiracy and the
	
	witch hunts of the 16th and 17th centuries.[100] 
	In the 20th century, blood libel accusations re-emerged as part of the
	
	satanic ritual abuse
	moral 
	panic.[100] The
	
	People's Republic of China as well as
	
	Chinese nationalists in the
	
	Republic of China in their effort to discredit Tibetan lamaism make 
	frequent and emphatic reference to the historical
	
	human sacrifice in Tibet, portraying the
	
	1950 People's Liberation Army invasion of Tibet as an act of 
	humanitarian intervention. According to Chinese sources, in the year 1948, 
	21 individuals were murdered by state sacrificial priests from Lhasa as part 
	of a ritual of enemy destruction, because their organs were required as 
	magical ingredients.[101] 
	The Tibetan Revolutions Museum established by the Chinese in Lhasa 
	has numerous morbid ritual objects on display to illustrate these claims.[102] 
	In Taiwan, Li Ao 
	in his TV talk show om 2006 claimed that the
	
	Dalai Lama had commanded human sacrifices, asking his followers to "tear 
	out human skin" for "some religious ceremony".[103] 
	Most of the human remains that the Chinese exhibit as gruesome evidence of 
	Tibetan human sacrifice are in fact body parts of people who died of natural 
	causes which were collected after
	sky 
	burial and preserved as relics.[49] Human sacrifice is illegal in India. But a few cases do occur in remote 
	and underdeveloped regions of the country, where modernity has not 
	penetrated well and tribal/semi-tribal groups adhere to cultural practices 
	as they did over the course of millennia. According to the Hindustan 
	Times, there was an incident of human sacrifice in western
	
	Uttar Pradesh in 2003.[104] 
	Similarly, police in
	Khurja 
	reported "dozens of sacrifices" in the period of half a year in 2006.[105] The
	
	Supreme Court of India habitually issues the
	
	death penalty to those found guilty of practising human sacrifice.[106] Human sacrifice, in the context of religious ritual, still occurs in 
	other traditional religions, for example in
	muti killings 
	in
	
	Eastern Africa. Human sacrifice is no longer officially condoned in any 
	country, and such cases are regarded as murder. In January, 2008,
	
	Milton Blahyi of
	Liberia 
	confessed being part of human sacrifices which "included the killing of an 
	innocent child and plucking out the heart, which was divided into pieces for 
	us to eat." He fought versus
	
	Charles Taylor's militia.[107] In August 2004, a muti killing took place in Ireland; the headless corpse 
	of a Malawi 
	woman was found near
	Piltown,
	
	County Kilkenny.[108] A 1989 book by investigative journalist
	
	Patrick Tierney documents a modern ritual human sacrifice during the 
	devastating
	
	earthquake and tsunami of 1960 by a
	
	Machi of the
	Mapuche 
	in the 
	Lago Budi community.[109] The victim, 5-year-old José Luis Painecur, had his arms and legs removed 
	by Juan Pañán and Juan José Paincur (the victim's grandfather), and was 
	stuck into the sand of the beach like a stake. The waters of the
	
	Pacific Ocean then carried the body out to sea. The sacrifice was 
	rumoured to be at the behest of local machi, Juana Namuncurá Añen. The two 
	men were charged with the crime and confessed, but later recanted. They were 
	released after two years. A judge ruled that those involved in these events 
	had "acted without free will, driven by an irresistible natural force of 
	ancestral tradition." The story is also mentioned in a Time magazine article from that 
	year, although with much less detail.[110] Ritual killings perpetrated by individuals or small groups within a 
	society that denounces them as simple murder are difficult to classify as 
	either "human sacrifice" or mere pathological homicide because they lack the 
	societal integration of
	sacrifice 
	proper. The instances closest to "ritual killing" in the criminal history of 
	modern society would be pathological serial killers such as the
	
	Zodiac Killer, and
	
	mass suicides with
	
	doomsday cult background, such as the
	
	Peoples Temple,
	
	Movement for the Restoration of the Ten Commandments of God,
	
	Order of the Solar Temple or
	
	Heaven's Gate incidents.[says 
	who?] Other examples include the "Matamoros 
	killings" attributed to Mexican cult leader
	
	Adolfo Constanzo and the "Superior Universal Alignment" killings in 
	1990s Brazil.[111] Human sacrifice has a history as a topic in literature, opera, video 
	games, and cinema. A recurrent theme in the
	Classics, 
	it returns to prominence in European imagination with the Spanish accounts 
	of the Aztec rituals.
	
	Derek Hughes in Culture and Sacrifice traces the topic's 
	iterations through the works of
	
	Shakespeare,
	
	Dryden and
	Voltaire, 
	and its central position in the operatic tradition from
	
	Mozart to
	
	Wagner and into 20th century works such as those of
	
	D.H. Lawrence.[112] "The 
	Lottery" is a 1948 short story that caused controversy in the United 
	States. 
	
	The Wicker Man is a 1973 film on the topic. In
	
	Rosemary Sutcliff's 1977 historical novel 
	
	Sun Horse, Moon Horse, the main character accepts a duty as a
	
	sacrificial king and lays down his life for the redemption of his 
	people, while inaugurating the creation of the
	
	Uffington White Horse. The majority of the plot of
	The 
	Beatles' film HELP! deals with a group that practises human 
	sacrifice trying to kill Ringo Starr because he is wearing the sacrificial 
	ring. In
	
	Tintin: Prisoners of the Sun the Inca leader comes close to 
	sacrificing
	
	Tintin,
	
	Captain Haddock, and
	
	Professor Calculus on a pyre to be set alight with parabolic mirrors. 
	This was for Calculus having committed sacrilege for wearing the bracelet of 
	Rascar Capac. In the 1984 film 
	
	Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, high priest Mola Ram 
	sacrifices men by magically removing their heart with one hand and lowering 
	them in boiling lava. One sacrifice is shown, in which the victim's 
	amputated heart
	
	spontaneously combusts when the victim hits the lava. In
	Mel 
	Gibson's 2006 film 
	
	Apocalypto, human sacrifice is done to appease the gods. In the 
	Dan Brown novel 
	
	The Lost Symbol, the book's main
	
	antagonist Mal'akh, prepares himself for the human sacrifice throughout 
	the story, believing that it is his great destiny to lead the forces of 
	evil. 
	 PINDAR The 
					Lizard King ?????? compiled 
					by Dee Finney According to David Icke, the heirarchy 
			goes like this :  Going Dutch On 9-18-01 - DREAM - I was being shown dividing 
						and putting together of letters and numbers. I remember 
						2 and 93, 94, and 15 - at the very end I was shown the 
						name Queen Beatrice of Holland and her dna sample.
						 [Editors NOTE: I am of Dutch heritage myself. I 
						had no idea what kind of connection I would find with 
						her, despite doing research on her life, I found nothing 
						back then. Now - my eyes are opening!] Who knows about this 12 foot albino 
			lizard??? I have heard them 
			call him the "Marquis de Libeaux". 
			Marquis actually means king. In French 
			it simply 
			means the Marquis of Libeaux. Marquis being a noble, Libeaux being 
			the name of some region.  Top Illuminati Family Names The original "Mother Goddess" after whom 
			a slew of deities including Queen Semiramis, Isis, Diana and others 
			were fashioned was Ninkharsag. The commander of the Annunaki was Enlil, 
			half-brother of Enki. The book of Genesis and Exodus and were based 
			on The Levites (initiates of the Egyptian mysteries); based on 
			Sumerian stories and accounts. Between 11,000 and 4000 bc 
			catastrophes were visited upon the earth, destroying the advanced 
			civilizations of the Golden Age. The Anunnaki are said to have 
			arrived 450,000 years ago. Their leader was the winged albino-white 
			Draco. 
			 The owner of this seal can be identified from the 
			cuneiform inscription which translates:  From what star constellation are the reptilians 
			said to originate? Where did the white race and the reptile-aryan 
			crossbreeds emerge from after the flood? What were the Aryans who left the Caucasus to rule 
			India called? Where did the Jewish race originate from? What do lions symbolize to the Aryans? It is inauspicious to begin an article with an
			oxymoron such as "cycle of human evolution." You know things 
			won't improve. The term human evolution refers only to
			phylogeny (Stirling failed to consult a dictionary). Perhaps 
			what he really wants to say is cultural development. "Almost 6000 years ago" (4000 BCE) falls 
			within the Chalcolithic (or Eneolithic) in Mesopotamia, which is 
			currently the countries of Iraq and northeastern Syria. Notice it's
			Mesopotamia, because Sumerian was a language and 
			Sumer was a culture. Sumerian disappeared as an official 
			language during the Agadian (Akkadian) period (2371-2230 BCE). "Almost 6000 years ago" coincides with the 
			building of a very simple temple at Tepe Gawra (Notice to 
			archaeology wonks: I'm using the Middle Chronology). Ubaid 
			culture evolved into the Warka (Uruk) culture; Warka 
			culture provided the earliest sample of writing in Mesopotamia. About 5500 years ago (3500 BCE) 
			Sumerian-speaking people came out of the hills, settled along 
			the Euphrates River, and built a large temple of mud brick at 
			Eridu. Almost 5000 years ago (about 3000 BCE) 
			Sumerian-speaking people added to existing structures to create 
			monumental architecture (such as the White Temple in Kullaba 
			and the temple at Eanna). They also began establishing city-states 
			and urban areas. The boundary of the cultures of Sumer and 
			Agade, according to the Sumerian king-list, consisted of the area 
			south of Baghdad defined by the Tigris, the Euphrates, and 
			the Persian Gulf. Influence of these cultures extended to Ebla 
			in the west, Nineveh in the north, and Susa (in Elam) 
			in the east. Unu (what Agadians called Uruk) 
			was the largest of the urban areas in Mesopotamia around 3000 BCE, a 
			total of 5.5 km2. Zechariah Sitchin has done a good job 
			researching the Sumerian records. One might start by reading that 
			first. Kingship and Ritual The scholarly model of development away from monarchy in most of 
			the Greek mainland is rooted in an overly uncritical acceptance of 
			fabricated king lists and of the relevance of the Roman and eastern 
			models for Greek practice. This acceptance stems from a desire to 
			credit ancient Greek accounts of their own past, but also from a 
			modern prejudice that traces a teleological development from 
			monarchy to various forms of republicanism. The construction of 
			mythico-historical kings satisfies a desire for tidy origins, as 
			well as for an original focus of authority from which subsequent 
			developments are diffused. We must, then, always ask whose interests 
			are served by a model of original kingship and hereditary descent of 
			authority. If aristocratic elites in the Archaic and Classical 
			period fantasized about royal descent, this served the dual purpose 
			of reinforcing their elite status and communicating to non-elites 
			the (relatively) more egalitarian nature of elite influence in the 
			polis. Thus attempts at dominance by powerful members of the elite 
			can be cast as reversion to a superseded past. The contrast between 
			legitimate hereditary kingship and illegitimate and tyrannical 
			usurpation of power may thus be seen as a contrast between a 
			quasi-official historical construction and the harsher reality of 
			authoritarian government. Second: ritual and cult. If Morris' emphasis on the chiefly 
			ritual importance of the wanax is sustainable (even if it 
			is not the whole story), the centrality of cult is a major area of 
			continuity between Bronze Age and later notions of monarchic rule. 
			Ritual kingship casts a shadow down as far as the Athenian 
			archôn basileus and the heroic honors paid to ancient city 
			founders. In most later conceptions, it is the gap between the human 
			and the divine that is significant, as we see in much of the poetry 
			of Pindar, and also in the vase paintings cited by Morris. Religious 
			and temporal power do not coincide. Yet the figure of the tyrant 
			complicates this divide. Sicilian tyrants such as Gelon and Hieron 
			were anxious to become city founders, by fair means or foul, and the 
			Emmenids of Acragas may have used their hereditary priesthoods as a 
			springboard for the acquisition of temporal power. Peisistratus' 
			charade as favorite of Athena, escorted into the polis by the 
			goddess in her chariot, is also relevant here. We start, it seems, 
			with a ritual king who does not embody our conception of monarchic 
			rule. While this tradition continues, we are also presented with an 
			authoritarian ruler (the tyrant) who attempts to draw to himself the 
			trappings of religious legitimation. This change of emphasis lies 
			behind the Zeus-like powers of the tyrant in tragedy and comedy, as 
			detailed by Seaford and Henderson. The Prometheus Bound 
			shows that if a tyrant can be conceived as a god, a god can also be 
			conceived as a tyrant. According to Zechariah Sitchin, who has written many books on the 
			Sumerian tablets, the term "men of renown" in the Genesis passage 
			should read, from its Sumerian origin, "men of the sky vehicles". 
			This puts rather a different complexion on the whole story and makes 
			a great deal more sense of it. The reference to "heroes of old" is 
			also relevant. The word hero comes from the Egyptian term, "heru, 
			which, according to researcher Wallis Budge, was "applied to the 
			king as a representative of the Sun God of Earth." The precise 
			meaning was "a human being was neither a god nor a daemon." The term 
			has the inference of a crossbreed race. The writer Homer (8th-9th 
			century BC) wrote that "the heroes were exalted above the race of 
			common men". The poet, Pindar, (518-438 BC) a very relevant name for 
			readers of "The Biggest Secret" by David Icke - used the term, 
			hero/heru, to describe a race "between gods and men". It is 
			extremely likely that Horus or Haru, the Egyptian son of God and a 
			mirror of the much later "Jesus" came from the term heru, which 
			means the Sun God's representative on Earth, the hybrid or Aryan 
			race. (p 72 - Children of the Matrix" by David Icke.) Morris' focus on cult is chiefly picked up by Seaford's treatment 
			of the tyrant in tragedy. For Seaford, one crucial aspect of the 
			tyrant is his perversion of ritual. We see this both in the stories 
			associated with historical tyrants such as Polycrates, and in the 
			abuse of ritual by tragic characters such as Clytemnestra. The abuse 
			of the sacred forms part of a larger pattern in which the 
			destruction of the royal family and the institution of polis cult 
			becomes a structuring principle in Greek tragedy. The contrast with 
			Morris' picture of the Bronze Age situation is instructive. There, 
			kingly authority is ritual authority. In the later period, 
			however, ritual becomes a tool in the pursuit of power, and is often 
			perverted by that pursuit. Seaford's tragic tyrant exists in a 
			problematic relationship with ritual, and successful polis cult is 
			only possible once the tyrant has been expelled. Thus religious 
			legitimation and power has been detached from the king and attached 
			to the polis. It seems reasonable to consider this a symptom of the 
			considerable transformation in governmental structures after the 
			Bronze Age. Even if, with Morris, we find traces of communitarian 
			government in the earlier period, it is clear that there has been a 
			reconfiguration of attitudes towards the individual figure of 
			authority. But the area in which the tension between individual and 
			community is played out remains constant, and that area is ritual. Another important characteristic of tyrannical power is wealth. 
			Seaford points out that tyrants are greedy for money and the power 
			it allows them to exercise. Yet tyrannical greed may have a positive 
			counterpart in lavish expenditure, and here again, the importance of 
			religious factors is striking. As Morris notes, the capacity of 
			sanctuaries in the Archaic period to attract tyrannical largesse and 
			the concomitant power and influence wielded by such sanctuaries, 
			reminds us of the religious significance of kingship in the 
			prehistoric period. Historical tyrants, both Greek and foreign, seek 
			legitimation and negotiate power in their relationships with these 
			sanctuaries. Just as tyrannical greed is intimately connected with 
			impiety in the world of tragedy, so tyrannical expenditure upon 
			offerings and religious building projects attempts to realign the 
			tyrant and re-embed him in the religious sphere. In the tragic 
			imagination, as Seaford suggests, the use of money may mark a 
			failure in reciprocity, but on a pragmatic level it enables 
			successful diplomatic exchange and marks pre-eminence. Thus it is 
			that the Athenian demos engages in quasi-tyrannical expenditure with 
			its massive use of public moneys, a phenomenon analyzed in Lisa 
			Kallet's fascinating essay. The demos both taxes and spends in a 
			demonstration of its pre-eminent power; its role as economic patron 
			forestalls challenge from members of the elite, who do not have the 
			resources to match it. The symbiotic relationship of tyranny, 
			wealth, and expenditure (studied by Kallet and Seaford), taken 
			together with the implication of the king or tyrant in religious 
			concerns (as we see in the essays of Morris and Seaford), goes far 
			to explain the extraordinary magnificence of the fifth-century 
			building program on the Athenian acropolis. While Kallet rightly 
			sees this as an instance of public patronage, it is significant that 
			this patronage, to use Morris' words, marks "the convergence of 
			polis and shrine." The third area where Morris' treatment of kingship is significant 
			for this volume as a whole is that of regional geographic variation. 
			This concern manifests itself in the remaining essays in two ways. 
			It emerges as an awareness that we can best understand Athenian 
			developments in light of a broader Greek context. Thus we note that 
			robust forms of kingship established themselves chiefly on the 
			margins of the Greek world, while the communitarian model had 
			greater force in the heartland. Nevertheless, a network of economic, 
			military, and diplomatic relationships ensured lively exchanges 
			between widely varying constitutions. My own essay explores the 
			notion of "constitutional slide" as a function of the close 
			proximity of differing forms of government. The richness of 
			constitutional variation allows both Plato and Isocrates to 
			criticize democratic tyranny and construct political structures 
			based on ethics rather than on the number of people in whom power 
			was vested. Regional variation mandates an awareness of multiple 
			audiences and permits the development of "amphibolic" readings of 
			texts as diverse as Isocrates' Panathenaicus and the 
			funerary monument of Dexileos, the object of an unsettling analysis 
			by Josiah Ober. Ober rightly points out that tyranny in the 
			Classical period was a concern to poleis other than Athens. Our 
			tendency towards Athenocentrism often predisposes us to ignore this 
			wider context, but to do so is to ignore an important area of 
			cultural exchange. Tyranny could remain a concern in Athens because 
			the Athenians had frequent contacts with kings and tyrants in a 
			politically unstable world. But it was an exportable concern, as 
			Ober's investigation of the Erythrae decree concerning repairs to 
			the statue of a tyrannicide shows. Athens liked to export democracy 
			to the subject cities of its empire, but its hatred of tyranny, and 
			the concomitant iconography of resistance to tyranny was just as 
			real an export. In the Bible.. after the deception, God 
			says that from then on, the serpent would have no legs and crawl 
			around on his belly? Doesn't this imply that at the time the serpent 
			DID have legs.. kind of like a reptoid? Is there a race of reptoids co-existing 
			with us? Is there a secret group, running the world who worship a 
			reptoid? Is it just one of MANY reptoids? Is it the leader of the 
			reptoids? Is it a completely different being, separate from those 
			reptoids? Do those reptoids even exist? Are the reptoid race nothing 
			more than Mankind's perceived evils personified into a form which is 
			the personification of evil in the Bible? Is it the Bible which 
			makes them Reptoid and not, say.. arachnid? A reptile statue found in graves of the Ubaid people who 
				lived in what is now Iraq up to around 4,000 BC. This culture 
				predates the Venus cataclysm which probably forced the surving 
				reptilians underground or into another dimension. 
			
			http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/archaeology/sites/middle_east/alubaid.html 
					 
					 Braidwood said, after he was unable to excavate the site 
					any further due to political reasons, that Jarmo as a 
					settlement was an social and economical example for future 
					Mesopotamian cultures that would arise around 4000 BC. It 
					was also the first site in the Near East in which 
					interdisciplinary field archeology was used to discover the 
					origins of food production. Images courtesy of
					
					http://www.maxpages.com/ribbentrop/Jarmo_Iraq References: Laure, Gerald A., Old Testament Life and Literature
					
					http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/gerald_larue/otll/chap6.html 
					1968 The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archeology in the Near East 
					http://www.maxpages.com/ribbentrop/Jarmo_Iraq 1997 
			
			http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000068TUE/104-8874394-9939902?v=glance Pindar called Sirius "the shape-shifting dog of the Great 
			Goddess." Chinese astronomers knew it as the Celestial Jackal 
			(Lang) that legendary figures used for target practice (with 
			the constellation Hu or Hushi, "bow").  SEE: EARLY 
			ASTRONOMY  BLOODLINES OF THE ILLUMINATI 
			
			Merovingian (European Royal Families) Interconnected families: You’ll also learn of the secretive, Chinese Li family, which 
			operates with impunity in the U.S.A. and around the world. Along the 
			way you’ll find out why President John F. Kennedy and actress Grace 
			Kelly were killed; who created the United Nations; who controls the 
			two major U.S. political parties; how the Rothschilds invented and 
			control modern-day Israel; who secretly founded false religions such 
			as the Jehovah’s Witnesses; and much, much more. A literal 
			encyclopedia of rare, unbelievable information! -DAVID ICKE tells in CHILDREN OF THE MATRIX, of his first 
			startling contact with "shape-shifters"...in early 1998... Here's the quote by David Icke... Cathy O'Brien and Mark Philips new book (Trance Formation of 
			America) and their experiences, if factual, may represent one of the 
			more important "leaks" from inside the mind-control empire. 
			Interestingly, Cathy's revelations as a former high-level mind 
			control slave form an important part of the evidentiary basis for 
			David Icke's insights into a reptoid-masonic power structure in "The 
			Biggest Secret." A friend of mine from the UK loaned me her copy of 
			Icke's book.  She's observed his work for several years in England, and tells 
			me he was a respected sportscaster there. It was only after he 
			exposed the Satanic-ritual murder and abuse rings surrounding the 
			Windsors (Queen Elizabeth, Prince Philip, the Queen Mother, and 
			others of the NWO) that his was attacked through disinformation in 
			the controlled press - using apparently the tactic that Icke thought 
			himself the messiah.  One significance of Cathy O'Brien's revelations as a high-order 
			mind control slave servicing an Elite (READ "Reptoid controlled) 
			network is the co-ordination of the MKULTRA (k for "kontrolle") 
			slave programme with global Masonic and Satanic ritual murder and 
			abuse networks. If Cathy's accounts are factual, the following may 
			be a socio-political-pathological reality:  1. Satanic ritual murder and sex abuse may be as a power-source 
			and >controlling practice with key operatives in a global 
			mind-control network. As a "Presidential Model", Cathy claims to 
			have officiated at ritual infanticide, blood-drinking, and sexual 
			abuse ceremonies in which the following key operatives took part:
			 David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger (Global consigliere) George 
			Bush, William Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Sen Robert Byrd (Kathy's 
			controller),  The top Reptoid seems to be code-named "Pindar".  2. "The Most Dangerous Game" is a variation on ritualistic murder 
			played by US Presidents. George Bush and William Clinton have played 
			this together. Target mind control slaves are let go in a secured 
			wilderness, and the Presidents hunt them with telescopic rifles. 
			Alternatively, mind control slaves are ordered to jump from a 
			helicopter in flight by the Commander in Chief. (George Bush 
			allegedly did this, by Cathy's account.) 3. Key state social services and adoption agencies, and some 
			Roman Catholic adoption agencies have served as farms to supply the 
			necessary babies for the infanticide rituals. Facilities such as 
			Disneyland are used to target "lost children" to feed the child 
			ritual murder machine. Breeding facilities with single mothers exist 
			to further supply the infanticide trade.  4. Secret facilities on military bases in Nevada hold infants in 
			cages, subjecting them to gross and unspeakable abuse, according to 
			mind control practices, to create a supply of dissociative mind 
			control slaves.  5. Ruling class resorts such as Bohemian Grove in California hold 
			Satanic ritual murder, blood-drinking and abuse rituals as an 
			integral part of their retreats. Organizations like Bohemian Grove 
			are part of the Reptoid-initiate farm system of the global mind 
			control network. 6. What we know in secular and vernacular terms as NWO is at a 
			deeper level a malevolent world-religion, based on 
			Satanic-Baal-Masonic principles, operating on a long-term time 
			horizon. Modern NWO objectives are being carried out using the 
			MKULTRA methodologies, implemented through a network of co-opted 
			and/or initiated elites.  According to Cathy, the "K" in M"K"ULTRA was actually code-named 
			Kontrolle, German for control, as a code-salutation to Josef 
			Mengele, head Nazi mind-controller who was slipped out of Germany at 
			then end of the war, along with Nazi elite. He stayed in the US 
			mainly, under cover and directing US mind control operations, 
			including MKULTRA. He died in 1990 in the US. The US mind control 
			empire was actually established by the Nazi mind control apparatus 
			being shipped here wholesale after the war. Cathy reports having met 
			Mengele a number of times in the US. Apparently she or other mind 
			control slaves also met Adolf Hitler here in the US. He was 
			allegedly slipped out of Germany as part of Operation Paperclip.  I have read creditable research by expert pathologists who 
			examined the dental records of the alleged corpse found in the 
			bunker, and it was by the forensic evidence not Hitler. So the very 
			real possibility exists that Hitler and the entire Nazi inner core 
			were in the US, carrying on the Agenda while we were growing up, 
			studying, working, raising families, and watching the US 
			distintegrate from the inside.  The next Bilderberger meeting is scheduled for June, 1999 in 
			Portugal. The resort where it is to be held is to be cleared for the 
			48 hours preceding the meeting, and guests fly in without visas. The 
			formal agenda is "Globalization." The Reptoids face a double bind. 
			On the one hand they perceive they have achieved many of the 
			structural elements for the secular NWO scheme. On the other, many 
			of the facts of the Reptoid inner core and plans are now surfacing 
			publicly. Major universe forces seem to be inflicting boomerangs 
			(Photon Belt). What will come out of this meeting must be decoded 
			from the public announcements. There are many facets, obviously, to 
			understanding this complex Reptoid pehnomenon that has been covertly 
			trying to move for global control over thousands of years. This mind 
			control empire facet is but one facet and not the whole game. The 
			good side is that this information is now in the open, and that 
			higher forces within the Universe - including the Photon Belt, are 
			at work. Obviously, there is much more to know. FROM:
			
			http://www.beyond-the-illusion.com/files/New-Files/990531/mkultraReptoidMindControlmachine.txt The leader of the Earths Illuminati 
			is called the "Pindar".
			The Pindar is a member of one of the 13 ruling Illuminati 
			families, and is always male. The title, Pindar, is an abbreviated 
			term for "Pinnacle of the Draco",
			also known as the "Penis of the Dragon".
			Symbolically, this represents the top of power, control, 
			creation, penetration, expansion, invasion, and fear. The holder of 
			this rank reports to the purebred Reptilian leader in the inner 
			Earth. Recently, there are reports that the 
			Marquis de Libeaux is the Pindar, but this is disinformation. The 
			true current Pindar is the head of the Rothschild family, as has 
			been for several hundred years. He is based in Germany near 
			Frankfurt. In the late 1970s, he oversaw the sister project to 
			Montauk, called M.A.L.D.A. is an anagram for Montauk-Alsace-Lorraine 
			Dimensional Activation. This project was located near the city of 
			Strasbourg, France, historically once part of Germany. Interestingly, there is a winery on 
			the east end of Long Island, not far from Montauk Point, called 
			Pindar Vineyards. This wine is growing in popularity, gaining 
			international accolades. This fits nicely into the plan, as this 
			area will be a part of the capital district of the Earth/United 
			Nations in the Empire State! Red wine is symbolic of the blood 
			ingested by the Reptilians. The wine can become sanctified as it did 
			in the Roman Catholic Church, a patsy for the Reptilians. In the 
			Catholic Church, wine replaced the blood in ceremony. The Illuminati here on Earth have 
			established a pyramid structure of control identical to the system 
			that exists in the Draco Empire. The pyramid with the Reptilian eye, 
			located on the American one-dollar bill, is symbolic of this control 
			structure. The eye is the cap on the pyramid, thus explaining why 
			the original surface of the Great Pyramid in Egypt was capped in 
			solid gold. The Pindar is represented by the gold 
			cap on the pyramid. The next layer, or "eye",
			on the pyramid represents the 13 ruling families. They are as 
			follows: Each of the 13 ruling families is 
			given an area of the Earth and/or a particular function to fulfill 
			on the Earth. These particular functions include global finances, 
			military technology/development, mind-control, religion, and media. Each of the 13 ruling families has a 
			council of 13 as well. The number, 13, has great significance to 
			them. They know that there are 12 types of energies that pass 
			through the 10 aspects of God-Mind. The totality of the 12 energies 
			equals a 13th energy. This is considered the most powerful 
			knowledge. They also know that there are really 
			13 Zodiac signs, not the commonly acknowledged 12. They have kept 
			the 13th hidden for centuries because it is the sign of the Dragon. 
			They keep the qualities and traits of this sign secret to avoid 
			giving away clues to the Reptilian mind-pattern. The next layer is the 
			second-in-command families who do the support work for the Pindar 
			and 13 ruling families. While all of the 13 ruling family members 
			are shape-shifters, all members of the 300 supporting families are 
			not. They do, however, all have a high percentage of Reptilian DNA. They are known as the 
			"Committee of 300".These families 
			include such notable names as Agnelli, Balliol, Beale, Bell, 
			Bouvier, Bush, Cameron, Campbell, Carnegie, Carrington, Coolidge, 
			Delano, Douglas, Ford, Gardner, Graham, Hamilton, Harriman, Heinz, 
			Kuhn, Lindsay, Loeb, Mellon, Montgomery, Morgan, Norman, 
			Oppenheimer, Rhodes, Roosevelt, Russell, Savoy, Schiff, Seton, 
			Spencer, Stewart/Stuart, Taft, and Wilson. There are many others. The Committee of 300 use many 
			well-known institutions to accomplish their goals, including the 
			Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderburgers, Trilateral Commission, 
			Club of Rome, Royal Institute for International Affairs, Mafia, CIA, 
			NSA, Mossad, Secret Service, International Monetary Fund, Federal 
			Reserve, Internal Revenue Service, and Interpol, to name a few. All 
			of these are private organizations or corporations set up as public 
			service devices, but this is far from the truth. The Illuminati structure also creates 
			artificial countries to further their goals. Examples of these are 
			the United States, Switzerland, Kuwait, the Soviet Union, Panama, 
			Israel, Italy, Yugoslavia, the United Kingdom, most of Black Africa, 
			all of the Arab countries, and all of Central and South America. 
			These nations were created to amass wealth for the ruling families 
			and their supporters, to hide or keep their wealth, and to create 
			unstable conditions necessary to start wars or increase military 
			budgets. Switzerland was created as a neutral 
			banking centre so that Illuminati families would have a safe place 
			to keep their funds without fear of destruction from 
			wars and prying eyes. The United States was established 
			with 13 colonies, one for each of the Illuminati families. The 
			original flag had 13 stars, and still has 13 stripes. The eagle, the 
			symbol of the United States, holds 13 arrows in its talons. The 
			United States is actually a corporate asset of the Virginia Company 
			that was established in 1604 in England with direct involvement of 
			the Rothschilds. The finances of the Rothschilds were necessary to 
			fund the exploration and exploitation of the North American 
			continent. The assets of the Virginia Company, 
			including the United States, are owned by the Holy Roman Empire via 
			the Vatican. This occurred in 1213 when King James gave all English 
			assets to the Reptilian Pope. Executorship remains with the British 
			royal family, but actual ownership lies with the Roman Catholic 
			Church. The United States of America is not 
			named after Amerigo Verspucci, as you learned in school. The 
			Illuminati would never name a continent, actually two continents, 
			after an Italian mapmaker. The name is actually a combination of 
			words. "Am" is the 
			Hebrew word for "people".
			"Ame" is also the command form of the 
			Spanish/Latin verb "to love".
			"Eri" or "ari"
			is a Hebrew term for "lion". 
			"Rica" is the feminine form of the 
			Spanish word for "rich". 
			"Ka" is the ancient Egyptian word for 
			soul, or spirit force within a body. There are two layers of meanings. The 
			Ancient Hebrew/Egyptian translates to say, "the 
			people of the lion with spirit force".
			Hence, the pyramid and all-seeing eye on the one-dollar bill. 
			The Latinized version translates to say, "love 
			riches", in a 
			feminized/physical reality way. This gives an idea of what they had 
			in mind. Take this a step further, and one 
			sees the mixture of the feminine Latin/eagle 
			ideas with the masculine Hebrew/lion ideas. The symbolic statement 
			of America is that it is a combination of Lemuria and Atlantis; 
			a blend of the human/Lyrae with Reptilian/Draco. Perhaps the anagram 
			LSD, an Illuminati created drug, has a hidden 
			meaning as well: Lyrae-Sirius-Draco! The combination 
			of these three civilizations would produce the most powerful, 
			technological Empire ever known! In 1776, the creation of the United 
			States as an independent nation coincided with the declaration into 
			public existence of the official Illuminati organization by member 
			Adam Weishaupt, in Bavaria. Publicly, Mr. 
			Weishaupt appeared to be determined to create an organization 
			comprised of the European elite that would uplift mankind. Of course, this was part of an 
			Illuminati global ceremony. The creation for the United States and 
			the Illuminati global ceremony. The creation of the United States 
			and the Illuminati organization were artificial beginnings for 
			public consumption. The United States was the device to be used to 
			bring the Illuminati into public acceptance. Current Illuminati 
			members believe that Adam Weishaupt was a look-alike for George 
			Washington, and it is actually Weishaupts image that appears on the 
			one-dollar bill. George Washington was a wealthy slave 
			and plantation owner. He is known to have raped some of his female 
			slaves and used some of the male slaves in ritualistic ceremony. 
			There are many people of the Black race who can literally trace 
			their genetics to the founding fathers. George Washington also 
			ordered the building of the Montauk Lighthouse in 1796. This 
			lighthouse included an underground area for supply storage in case 
			of a British coastline invasion. If he had only known what that area 
			would become - or did he? The 13 ruling Illuminati families 
			constantly vie for control amongst themselves. During this time 
			period, the Spanish, British, and French Illuminati all fought to 
			win control over North and South America. The Rothschilds kept these 
			Illuminati factions in line by sending Hessian troops to monitor the 
			situation. The leaders enjoyed these war games, pitting one against 
			the other to see who would win. The hundreds of thousands of lives 
			lost were meaningless to them. The Manifest Destiny of the United 
			States was created to expand the territory of the Aryans at the 
			expense of the native populations. As always, the Illuminati seek to 
			destroy native peoples and their cultures. This is an attempt to 
			destroy their knowledge of God-Mind, as well as the possibility that 
			the natives will impart this information on to others. Especially 
			important is their need to eliminate native cultures with ancient 
			knowledge of Atlantis and Lyrae. The natives that gave them the most 
			problem were the Cherokee Indians because this tribe retained most 
			of their Atlantean knowledge, even accessing the Bear/Bigfoot 
			frequency for information. For this reason, these people were 
			uprooted from their homeland in the southern Appalachian Mountains, 
			and forcibly marched to Oklahoma on what is now known as The Trail 
			of Tears. Many died along the way. Only a 
			remnant remained in North Carolina, Tennessee, and Georgia. In the 
			north, the vast Iroquois/ Mohawk nation was disbanded. The Montauk, 
			direct descendents of the Atlanteans who call their leader Pharaoh, 
			were systematically eliminated. The Rothschilds were aggressively 
			involved with the slave trade from Africa, importing slaves to North 
			and South America as well as the Caribbean. They were very careful 
			not to import Blacks from the eastern areas of Ethiopia or Sudan 
			where the descendents of Solomon were located, instead concentrating 
			on western and central Africa for the slave populations. These areas 
			had the pure mixture of Annunnakki and simian genetics, and the 
			programming desirable for the Illuminati agenda. The Rothschilds decided that 
			splitting the United States colonies would double their profits. So 
			they politically created, and financially supported, the Civil War. 
			The Civil War was actually a global ceremonial ritual to bring 
			slavery to its next level. This war allowed the North to win,
			and publicly abolish slavery. The best slaves are the ones 
			who do not realize that they are slaves. This alleviates rebellion 
			and resistance. This was the status immediately following the Civil 
			War. Blacks in the South are still slaves. There is still 
			segregation, even in the North. The Illuminati still consider Blacks 
			to be second or third class citizens. Only now the slavery is subtle 
			and masked. Since the Civil War, there have been 
			other staged wars that entrenched the trend toward globalization. 
			The Spanish-American War of 1898-1899 acquired more land for the 
			American Illuminati, placing a greater portion of the Earth's 
			surface under American jurisdiction. World War I was designed to 
			change the map of Europe as well as test germ and chemical warfare 
			technology for future use. This coincided with the worldwide 
			influenza outbreak designed to reduce the global population, making 
			control easier. World War I also laid the foundation for the German 
			role in the next war. World War II was a test of the final 
			globalization and extermination projects. It was also designed to 
			test mind-control machinations; to test the use of fluoride which 
			deadens brain activity and slows resistance to authority; to 
			experiment with slave labor camps and study the development of 
			resistance; and to teach the masses to spy and report on one 
			another. World War II brought three primary 
			goals of the Illuminati to fruition. The first was that hidden 
			Illuminati symbolisms were brought to public attention from the 
			underground strongholds in Tibet and Egypt, such as the Swastika and 
			the ankh. The second was the creation of the State of Israel as a 
			foundation for the New World Religion. The last was the creation of 
			nuclear weapons as part of the Illuminati global ceremony. During World War II, the Germans 
			helped to perfect "sex-slaves"
			as a means of transmitting information amongst the elite. 
			Sex-slaves can be either male or female, who are sexually programmed 
			using Wilhelm Reich procedures, which are illegal in the United 
			States, but used by the Illuminati and government. These sex-slaves deliver messages and 
			keep programmed sleepers in line. The sex-slave is downloaded with a 
			message or function through various sexual acts and drugs, which can 
			only be released by repeating the same sexual act with the target, 
			or person, to be activated. They are trained to know their target's 
			trigger words and trigger events to activate, delete, or change 
			programming. In recent years, several women have 
			come forward claiming to be the sex-slaves of globally recognized 
			political figures. Many were used as information couriers between 
			high-level male Illuminati. Usually, lookalikes of the political 
			figures are used in the incipient programming as a focal point for 
			the sex-slave. The slave is put through a desensitizing process, so 
			there is no pleasure in the sexual act; it is merely a duty to be 
			performed. Many times the slave becomes sexually promiscuous, 
			repeatedly having sex with people who look like the intended target. 
			It is a sad life. By the end of World War II, one of 
			the three major Illuminati global rituals was accomplished. This was 
			the nuclear explosion that took place in 1945 at the 33rd parallel 
			as a test for the nuclear attack on Japan. This explosion was 
			symbolic, representing the simultaneous creation and destruction of 
			matter and energy. The year was symbolic as well. In numerology, 1 + 
			9 = 10, representing the 10 aspects of God-Mind. The number 10 
			further breaks down to 1 + 0 = 1, representing a new beginning. 
			Continuing, 4 + 5 = 9, representing the end of a cycle. 
			Symbolically, the entire event represented the end of a cycle to 
			prepare for a new beginning using the new creation of God-Mind out 
			of destruction. Additionally, a cylinder containing 
			material still not explained by the government was trucked into the 
			nuclear explosion testing. This cylinder was made from pure steel 
			and allegedly was the same physical dimensions as the
			Kabala describes for the creation of Golems. 
			Kabala is ancient Hebrew metaphysics that has been a staple for the 
			Illuminati for millennia. Golems are artificial beings that are used 
			as a slave force. It is highly probable that this was a symbolic 
			ritual for the creation of the society of Golems. World War II also allowed the 
			European/American Illuminati to destroy the Japanese Illuminati 
			desires of global domination. The Japanese royal family, represented 
			by Emperor Hirohito, have always been ostracized as non-legitimate 
			by the ruling 13 families. The Japanese claim to be direct 
			descendents of Lemurian purebred Reptilians. The European/American Illuminati 
			claim that the Japanese Illuminati are descendents from a lower 
			species in the Draco hierarchy. This lower species is considered a 
			worker class without any political clout or influence. The 
			European/American Illuminati also claim that East Indians are a 
			lower species in the Draco hierarchy. The 13 ruling families 
			consider light skin and hair to be an elite characteristic. On January 17, 1994, Japan sent a 
			seismic event to California. Exactly one year later on January 17, 
			1995, the city of Kobe, Japan was seismically destroyed. Kobe was 
			the home of the Japanese electromagnetic weaponry centres. The 
			European/American Illuminati will not tolerate thorns in their 
			sides. The destruction of Japan and its royal family will continue 
			in the coming months. Every year, the Illuminati 
			hold meetings to plan the events of the coming year to accomplish 
			their main objective formulated millennia ago of global control and 
			domination. In the 1850s, they pinpointed their target date for 
			complete domination with an agenda called Plan 2000. This has since 
			been revised to 2003. The fiasco election of George W. Bush Jr. to 
			office is a key sign that they are on target. The public lesson of 
			the United States presidential "election"
			of 2000 is that the citizens do not vote for anyone! 
			Even the Illuminati are now finding it increasingly difficult to 
			conceal their plans. THE TIMELESS KABIRI(1) FROM the very day when the first mystic found the means of 
			communication between this world and the worlds of the invisible 
			host, between the sphere of matter and that of pure spirit, he 
			concluded that to abandon this mysterious science to the profanation 
			of the rabble was to lose it.  The Kabiri or the Kabirim [the name is Phoenician] 
			were Deities and very mysterious gods with the ancient nations, 
			including the Israelites, and were held in the highest veneration at 
			Thebes, in Lemnos, Phrygia, Macedonia, and especially at Samothrace. 
			They were mystery gods, no profane having the right to name or speak 
			of them. Herodotus makes of them Fire-gods and points to Vulcan as 
			their father. The Kabiri presided over the Mysteries, and their 
			real number has never been revealed, their occult meaning being 
			very sacred.  The Kabiri were also Assyrian gods. In Hebrew the name means "the 
			mighty ones," Gibborim. In Samothrace, an island famous and 
			renowned for its Mysteries all over the world -- perhaps the oldest 
			ever established in our present race -- they were the 
			Samothraces. The latter are considered identical with the 
			Kabiri, Dioscuri and Corybantes. The names of the Samothraces were 
			mystical, denoting Pluto, Ceres or Proserpine, Bacchus and 
			Æsculapius, or Hermes. At one time all the deities connected with 
			fire, whether they were divine, infernal or volcanic, were 
			called Kabirian. With the Christians, however, they are now devils, 
			although the modern Archangels are the direct transformation of 
			these same Kabiri.  Those who know anything of the Samothracian mysteries will 
			remember that the generic name of the Kabiri was the "Holy Fires," 
			which created on seven localities of the island of Electria (or 
			Samothrace) the "Kabir born of the Holy Lemnos" (the island sacred 
			to Vulcan). According to Pindar, this Kabir, whose name was Adamas, 
			was, in the traditions of Lemnos, the type of the primitive man born 
			from the bosom of the Earth. He was the archetype of the first males 
			in the order of generation, and was one of the seven autochthonous 
			ancestors or progenitors of mankind.  A Mystery, imparted to but very few initiates, was enacted once 
			every seven years during the Mysteries, and the records of it are 
			found self-imprinted on the leaves of the Thibetan sacred tree, the 
			mysterious Kounboum, in the Lamasery of the holy adepts. In the 
			shoreless ocean of space radiates the central, spiritual, and 
			invisible sun. The universe is his body, spirit, and soul; and 
			after this ideal model are framed all "things." These three 
			emanations are the three lives, the three degrees of the gnostic 
			Pleroma, the three "Kabalistic Faces," for the 
			ANCIENT of the ancient, the holy of the aged, the great 
			En-Soph, "has a form and then he has no form." The invisible 
			"assumed a form when he called the universe into existence," says 
			the Sohar, the Book of Splendor. The first light is 
			His Soul, the Infinite, Boundless, and Immortal breath; under the 
			efflux of which the universe heaves its mighty bosom, infusing 
			intelligent life throughout creation. The second emanation 
			condenses cometary matter and produces form within the cosmic 
			circle; sets the countless worlds floating in the electric space, 
			and infuses the unintelligent, blind life-principle into 
			every form. The third produces the whole universe of physical 
			matter; and as it keeps gradually receding from the Central Divine 
			Light its brightness wanes and it becomes DARKNESS 
			and the BAD -- pure matter, the "gross 
			purgations of the celestial fire" of the Hermetists.  When the Central Invisible, the "highest and greatest Creative
			POWER," saw the efforts of the divine 
			Scintilla [Over-Soul], unwilling to be dragged lower down into 
			the degradation of matter, to liberate itself, he permitted it to 
			shoot out from itself a monad, over which, attached to it as 
			by the finest thread, the Divine Scintilla had to watch during its 
			ceaseless peregrinations from one form to another. Thus the monad 
			was shot down into the first form of matter and became encased in a 
			stone; then, in course of time, through the combined efforts of 
			living fire and living water, both of which shone their
			reflection upon the stone, the monad crept out of its prison 
			to sunlight as a lichen. From change to change it went higher and 
			higher; the monad, with every new transformation borrowing more of 
			the radiance of its parent, Scintilla (Soul), which 
			approached it nearer at every transmigration. For "the First Cause 
			had willed it to proceed in this order"; and destined it to creep on 
			higher until the physical form became once more the Adam of dust,
			shaped in the image of the Adam Kadmon (Pitris).  Before undergoing its last earthly transformation, the external 
			covering of the monad, from the moment of its conception as an 
			embryo, passes in turn, once more, through the phases of the several 
			kingdoms. In its fluidic prison it assumes a vague resemblance at 
			various periods of the gestation to plant, reptile, bird, and 
			animal, until it becomes a human embryo. At the birth of the future 
			man, the monad, radiating with all the glory of its immortal parent 
			[Dhyani-Buddha] which watches it from the seventh sphere, becomes 
			senseless. It loses all recollection of the past, and returns to 
			consciousness but gradually, when the instinct of childhood gives 
			way to reason and intelligence. After the separation between the 
			life-principle (astral spirit) and the body takes place, the 
			liberated soul -- Monad, exultingly rejoins the mother and father 
			spirit [i.e., the Fire-Kabiri], the radiant Augoeides, and the two, 
			merged into one, forever form, with a glory proportioned to the 
			spiritual purity of the past earth-life, the Adam who has completed 
			the circle of necessity, and is freed from the last vestige of his 
			physical encasement. Henceforth, growing more and more radiant at 
			each step of his upward progress, he mounts the shining path that 
			ends at the point from which he started around the Grand Cycle.  If one studies comparative Theogony, it is easy to find that the 
			secret of these "Fires" was taught in the Mysteries of every ancient 
			people, pre-eminently in Samothrace. There is not the smallest doubt 
			that the Kabiri, the most arcane of all the ancient deities, gods 
			and men, great deities and Titans, are identical with the Kumaras 
			and Rudras headed by Kartikeya [Mars, personifying the powers 
			of the LOGOS] -- a Kumara also. This is quite 
			evident even exoterically; and these Hindu deities were, like the 
			Kabiri, the personified sacred Fires of the most occult powers of 
			Nature. The several branches of the Aryan Race, the Asiatic and 
			the European, the Hindu and the Greek, did their best to conceal 
			their true nature, if not their importance. As in the case of the 
			Kumaras, the number of the Kabiri is uncertain. Some say that they 
			were three or four only; others say seven. Thus, while in Samothrace 
			and the oldest Egyptian temples they were the great Cosmic Gods (the 
			seven and the forty-nine Sacred Fires), in the Grecian fanes 
			their rites became mostly phallic, therefore to the profane, 
			obscene. In the latter case they were three and four, or seven -- 
			the male and female principles -- (the crux ansata), this 
			division showing why some classical writers held that they were only 
			3, while others named 4. And these were, the Kabiri Axieros (in his 
			female aspect, Demeter); Axio-Kersa (Persephone); Axiokersos (Pluto 
			or Hades); and Kadmos or Kadmilos (Hermes -- not the ithyphallic 
			Hermes mentioned by Herodotus ... but "he of the sacred legend," 
			explained only during the Samothracian mysteries). They may very 
			well stand for the alter-egos of the four Kumaras, Sanat-Kumara, 
			Sananda, Sanaka, and Sanatana. The former deities, whose reputed 
			father was Vulcan, were often confounded with the Dioscuri, 
			Corybantes, Anaces, etc., just as the Kumara, whose reputed father 
			is Brahmâ (or rather, the "Flame of his Wrath") ... were confounded 
			with the Asuras, the Rudras, and the Pitris, for the simple reason 
			that they are all one -- i.e., correlative Forces and Fires.  The Kabirim, the "mighty ones," are identical with our primeval 
			Dhyan-Chohans, with the incorporeal and corporeal Pitris, and with 
			all the rulers and instructors of the primeval races, which are 
			referred to as the Gods and Kings of the divine Dynasties. It 
			matters little whether it is Isis, or Ceres -- the "Kabiria" -- or 
			again the Kabiri. Every nation has either the seven and ten 
			Rishi-Manus and Prajapatis; the seven and ten Ki-y; or ten 
			and seven Amshaspends (six exoterically, if Ormazd, their chief and 
			Logos, is excluded); ten and seven Chaldean Anedots, ten and seven 
			Sephiroth, etc., etc. One and all have been derived from the 
			primitive Dhyan-Chohans of the Esoteric doctrine, or the "Builders" 
			of the Stanzas. From Manu, Thot-Hermes, Oannes Dagon, and 
			Edris-Enoch, down to Plato and Panadores, all tell us of seven 
			divine Dynasties, of seven Lemurian and seven Atlantean 
			divisions of the earth; of the seven primitive and dual gods 
			who descend from their celestial abode and reign on Earth, teaching 
			mankind Astronomy, Architecture, and all the other sciences that 
			have come down to us.  These Beings appear first as "gods" and Creators; then they merge 
			in nascent man, to finally emerge as "divine-Kings and Rulers." But 
			this fact has been gradually forgotten. As Bosuage shows, the 
			Egyptians themselves confessed that science flourished in their 
			country only since Isis-Osiris, whom they continue to adore as gods, 
			"though they had become Princes in human form." And he adds of 
			Osiris-Isis (the divine androgyne): "It is said that this Prince 
			(Isis-Osiris) built cities in Egypt, stopped the overflowing of the 
			Nile; invented agriculture, the use of the vine, music, astronomy, 
			and geometry."  It is the Kabiri who are credited with having revealed, by 
			producing corn or wheat, the great boon of agriculture. What 
			Isis-Osiris, the once living Kabiria, has done in Egypt, that Ceres 
			is said to have done in Sicily; they all belong to one class. To 
			them, the Kabiri or Titans, is ascribed the invention of letters 
			(the Devanagari, or the alphabet and language of the gods), 
			of laws and legislature, of architecture, as of the various modes of 
			magic, so-called; and of the medical use of plants. Hermes, Orpheus, 
			Cadmus, Asclepius, all those demi-gods and heroes, to whom is 
			ascribed the revelation of sciences to men, and in whom Bryant, 
			Faber, Bishop Cumberland, and so many other Christian writers, too 
			zealous for the plain truth, would force posterity to see only pagan 
			copies of one and sole prototype, named Noah -- are all generic
			names.  As to the Jewish Noah, no Occultist would ever think of 
			dispossessing him of his prerogatives, if he is claimed to be an 
			Atlantean; for this would simply show that the Israelites repeated 
			the story of Vaivasvata-Manu, Xisuthrus, and so many others, and 
			that they only changed the name, to do which they had the same right 
			as any other nation or tribe. What we object to is the literal 
			acceptation of Biblical chronology, as it is absurd, and in accord 
			with neither geological data nor reason. Moreover, if Noah was an 
			Atlantean, then he was a Titan, a giant, as Faber shows; and if a 
			giant, then why is he not shown as such in Genesis? The 
			Titans and Kabirs have been invariably made out by the theologians 
			and some pious symbologists as indissolubly connected with the 
			grotesque personage called devil, and every proof to the 
			contrary has been hitherto as invariably rejected and ignored; 
			therefore, the Occultist must neglect nothing which may tend to 
			defeat this conspiracy of slander.  Neither the Chaldean nor the Biblical deluge (the stories of the 
			Babylonian Xisuthrus and Noah) is based on the universal or even on 
			the Atlantean deluges, recorded in the Indian allegory of 
			Vaivasvata-Manu. They are all the exoteric allegories based on 
			the esoteric mysteries of Samothrace. If the older Chaldees knew 
			the esoteric truth of Samothrace in the Puranic legends, the other 
			nations were aware only of the Samothracian mystery, and allegorized 
			it. They adapted it to their astronomical and anthropological, or 
			rather phallic, notions. Samothrace is known historically to 
			have been famous in antiquity for a deluge, which submerged the 
			country and reached the top of the highest mountains; an event which 
			happened before the age of the Argonauts. It was overflowed very 
			suddenly by the waters of the Euxine, regarded up to that time as a 
			lake. If, while coupling with this the fact that Samothrace was 
			colonized by the Phoenicians, and before them by the mysterious 
			Pelasgians who came from the East, one remembers also the identity 
			of the mystery gods of the Phoenicians, Chaldeans, and 
			Israelites, it will be easy to discover whence came also the 
			confused account of the Noachian deluge.  Thus it is very important to prevent fanatics from monopolising 
			all the facts in history and legend, and from fathering their 
			distortions of truth, history, and legend upon one man. Noah, 
			is either a myth along with the others or one whose legend 
			was built upon the Kabirian or Titanic tradition, as taught in 
			Samothrace. He has, therefore, no claim to be monopolised by either 
			Jew or Christian. If, as Faber tried to demonstrate at such cost of 
			learning and research, Noah is an Atlantean, and a Titan, and his 
			family are Kabiri or pious Titans, etc., then biblical chronology 
			falls by its own weight, and along with it all the patriarchs -- the 
			antediluvian and pre-Atlantean Titans. As now discovered and proven, 
			Cain is Mars, the god of power and generation. Tubal-Cain is a 
			Kabir, "an instructor of every artificer in brass and iron"; or, if 
			this will please better, he is one with Hephaestos or Vulcan -- 
			Vul-cain, the greatest god also with the later Egyptians, and the 
			greatest Kabir. The god of time was Chium in Egypt, or 
			Saturn, or Seth, and Chium is the same as Cain. Jabal is taken from 
			the Kabiri -- instructors in agriculture, "such as have cattle," and 
			Jubal is "the father of those who handle the harp," he, or they
			who fabricated the harp for Kronos and the trident for Poseidon.
			 The history or "fables" about the mysterious Telchines, fables 
			echoing each and all the archaic events of our esoteric teachings, 
			furnish us with a key to the origin of Cain's genealogy; they give 
			the reason why the Roman Catholic Church identifies "the accursed 
			blood" of Cain and Ham with Sorcery, and makes it responsible for 
			the Deluge. Were not the Telchines, it is argued, the mysterious 
			iron-workers of Rhodes; they who were the first to raise statues to 
			the gods, furnish them with weapons, and men with magic arts? And is 
			it not they who were destroyed by a deluge at the command of Zeus, 
			as the Cainites were by that of Jehovah? The Telchines are 
			simply the Kabiri and the Titans, in another form. They are the 
			Atlanteans also. "Like Lemnos and Samothrace," says Decharme, 
			"Rhodes, the birthplace of the Telchines, is an island of volcanic 
			formation." The island of Rhodes emerged suddenly out of the seas, 
			after having been previously engulfed by the Ocean, say the 
			traditions. Like Samothrace it is connected in the memory of men 
			with the Flood legends.  The Kabiri are in truth "the great, beneficent and powerful 
			Gods," as Cassius Hermone calls them. At Thebes, the Kabirim 
			Kore and Demeter had a sanctuary, and at Memphis, the Kabiri had a 
			temple so sacred that none, excepting the priests, were suffered to 
			enter their holy precincts. During the Samothracian Mysteries, 
			"after the distribution of pure Fire a new life began." This was the 
			"new birth" that is alluded to by Jesus in his nocturnal 
			conversation with Nicodemus. "Initiated into the most blessed of all 
			the Mysteries, being ourselves pure ... we become just and holy with 
			wisdom." "He breathed on them and saith unto them, 'Take of 
			Holy Pneuma'." And this simple act of will-power was sufficient to 
			impart vaticination in its nobler and more perfect form if both the 
			initiator and the initiated were worthy of it. To deride this gift, 
			even in its present aspect, "as the corrupt offspring and lingering 
			remains of an ignorant age of superstition, would be as 
			unphilosophical as it is wrong," as remarked by a 19th century 
			minister. "To remove the veil which hides our vision from the 
			future, has been attempted in all ages of the world."  The fact that, astronomically, the Titans-Kabirim were also the 
			generators and regulators of the seasons, and cosmically the great 
			Volcanic Energies, the gods presiding over all the metals and 
			terrestrial works, does not prevent them from being, in their 
			original divine characters, the beneficent Entities who, symbolized 
			in Prometheus, brought light to the world, and endowed 
			humanity with intellect and reason. They are pre-eminently in every 
			theogony, especially in the Hindu, the sacred Divine 
			FIRES, 3, 7, or 49, according as the allegory demands it. 
			They were universally worshipped, and their origin is lost in the 
			night of time. Yet whether propitiated in Phrygia, Phoenicia, the 
			Troad, Thrace, Egypt, Lemnos or Sicily, their cult was always 
			connected with fire; their temples ever built in the most volcanic 
			localities, and in exoteric worship they belonged to Chthonian 
			Divinities. Therefore Christianity has made of them infernal 
			gods. Nor must it be lost sight of that the Kabiri were of both 
			sexes, as also terrestrial, celestial and kosmic. While in their 
			later capacity of the Rulers of sidereal and terrestrial powers, a 
			purely geological phenomenon was symbolized in the persons of those 
			rulers, they were also, in the beginning of times, the rulers of 
			mankind. When incarnated as Kings of the "divine Dynasties," they 
			gave the first impulse to civilizations, and directed the mind with 
			which they had endued men to the invention and perfection of all the 
			arts and sciences. Thus the Kabiri are said to have appeared as the 
			benefactors of men, and as such they lived for ages in the memory of 
			nations.  They had other names in the "sacred language," known but to the 
			hierophants and priests; and "it was not lawful to mention them." We 
			find them pronounced, albeit slightly disfigured, as known in that 
			same sacred language -- by the populations of Siam, Thibet, and 
			India. And on the walls of the Cambodian Nagkon-Wat are to be found 
			at this day several repetitions of the Kabirian gods of Samothrace. 
			This may have escaped the notice of archaeologists, but upon 
			stricter inspection they will be found there, as well as the reputed 
			father of the Kabiri -- Vulcan, with his bolts and implements, 
			having near him a king with a sceptre in his hand, which is the 
			counterpart of that of Cheronaea, or the "scepter of Agamemnon," 
			so-called, said to have been presented to him by the lame god of 
			Lemnos. In another place we find Vulcan, recognizable by his hammer 
			and pincers, but under the shape of a monkey, as usually represented 
			by the Egyptians. It is easy to see that the excavators of Ellora, 
			the builders of the old Pagodas, the architects of Copan and of the 
			ruins of Central America, those of Nagkon-Wat, and those of the 
			Egyptian remains were, if not of the same race, at least of the same 
			religion -- the one taught in the oldest Mysteries. And if, as 
			sometimes thought, Nagkon-Wat is essentially a Buddhist temple, how 
			comes it to have on its walls basso relievos of completely an 
			Assyrian character and Kabirian gods which, though universally 
			worshipped as the most ancient of the Asiatic mystery-gods, had 
			already been abandoned 200 years B.C., and the Samothracian 
			mysteries themselves completely altered? NOTE.--Collated from the writings of H. P. 
			Blavatsky. Pindar "Happy," says Pindar, who passed through the august mysteries of 
			Eleusis, "is he who has beheld them, and descends beneath the hollow 
			earth. He knows the end, he knows the divine origin of life." As, in 
			Pantanjali's system of Yoga, the pupil goes gradually onward and 
			upward, from the state of animal man, through the stages of 
			self-mastery and psychic development, until he flowers into the true 
			Yogi and unites his consciousness with the infinite, so in all the 
			mystical schools of Greece, Rome, Egypt, and other trans-Himalayan 
			countries, he had to pass through a like education. [[Vol. 2, Page]] 118 THE SECRET DOCTRINE. "The early Second (Root) Race were the Fathers of 
			the 'Sweat-born'; the later Second (Root) 
			Race were 'Sweat-born' themselves."  This passage from the Commentary refers to the work of evolution 
			from the beginning of a Race to its close. The "Sons of Yoga," or 
			the primitive astral race, had seven stages of evolution 
			racially, or collectively; as every individual Being in it had, 
			and has now. It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man 
			into a series of seven, but Nature herself. Thus the first sub-races 
			of the Second Race were born at first by the process described on 
			the law of analogy; while the last began gradually, pari passu
			with the evolution of the human body, to be formed otherwise. 
			The process of reproduction had seven stages also in each Race, each 
			covering aeons of time. What physiologist or biologist could tell 
			whether the present mode of generation, with all its phases of 
			gestation, is older than half a million, or at most one million of 
			years, since their cycle of observation began hardly half a century 
			ago.  Primeval human hermaphrodites are a fact in Nature well known to 
			the ancients, and form one of Darwin's greatest perplexities. Yet 
			there is certainly no impossibility, but, on the contrary, a great 
			probability that hermaphroditism existed in the evolution of the 
			early races; while on the grounds of analogy, and on that of the 
			existence of one universal law in physical evolution, acting 
			indifferently in the construction of plant, animal, and man, it must 
			be so. The mistaken theories of mono-genesis, and the descent of man 
			from the mammals instead of the reverse, are fatal to the 
			completeness of evolution as taught in modern schools on Darwinian 
			lines, and they will have to be abandoned in view of the insuperable 
			difficulties which they encounter. Occult tradition -- if the terms 
			Science and Knowledge are denied in this particular to antiquity -- 
			can alone reconcile the inconsistencies and fill the gap. "If thou 
			wilt know the invisible, open thine eye wide on the visible," says a 
			Talmudic axiom.  In the "Descent of Man"* occurs the following 
			passage; which shows how near Darwin came to the acceptance of this 
			ancient teaching.  "It has been known that in the vertebrate kingdom one sex bears 
			rudiments of various accessory parts appertaining to the 
			reproductive system, which properly belong to the opposite sex. . . 
			. Some remote progenitor of the whole vertebrate kingdom appears to 
			have been hermaphrodite or androgynous** . . . But here we encounter 
			a singular difficulty. In the mammalian class the males 
			possess rudiments of a uterus with the adjacent passages in the 
			Vesiculae prostaticae; they bear also rudiments of mammae, 
			and some male marsupials have traces of a marsupial sac. Other 
			analogous facts could be added. Are we then to suppose that some 
			extremely ancient mammal continued androgynous after it had acquired 
			the chief distinctions of its class, and therefore after it had 
			diverged from the lower classes of the vertebrate kingdom? This 
			seems very improbable,*** for we have to look to fishes, the 
			lowest of all the classes, to find any still existent androgynous 
			forms."  Mr. Darwin is evidently strongly disinclined to adopt the 
			hypothesis which the facts so forcibly suggest, viz., that of a 
			primeval androgynous  ** And why not all the progenitive first Races, human as well as 
			animal; and why one "remote progenitor"?  *** Obviously so, on the lines of Evolutionism, which traces the 
			mammalia to some amphibian ancestor.  stem from which the mammalia sprang. His explanation runs: -- 
			"The fact that various accessory organs proper to each sex, are 
			found in a rudimentary condition in the opposite sex may be 
			explained by such organs having been gradually acquired by the one 
			sex and then transmitted in a more or less imperfect condition to 
			the other." He instances the case of "spurs, plumes, and brilliant 
			colours, acquired for battle or for ornament by male birds" and only
			partially inherited by their female descendants. In the 
			problem to be dealt with, however, the need of a more satisfactory 
			explanation is evident, the facts being of so much more prominent 
			and important a character than the mere superficial details with 
			which they are compared by Darwin. Why not candidly admit the 
			argument in favour of the hermaphroditism which characterises the 
			old fauna? Occultism proposes a solution which embraces the facts in 
			a most comprehensive and simple manner. These relics of a prior 
			androgyne stock must be placed in the same category as the pineal 
			gland, and other organs as mysterious, which afford us silent 
			testimony as to the reality of functions which have long since 
			become atrophied in the course of animal and human progress, but 
			which once played a signal part in the general economy of primeval 
			life.  The occult doctrine, anyhow, can be advantageously compared with 
			that of the most liberal men of science, who have theorised upon the 
			origin of the first man.  Long before Darwin, Naudin, who gave the name of Blastema 
			to that which the Darwinists call protoplasm, put forward a 
			theory half occult and half scientifico-materialistic. He made Adam, 
			the a-sexual, spring suddenly from the clay, as it 
			is called in the Bible, the Blastema of Science. "It is 
			from this larval form of mankind that the evolutive force effected 
			the completion of species. For the accomplishment of this great 
			phenomenon, Adam had to pass through a phase of immobility and 
			unconsciousness, very analogous to the nymphal state of animals 
			undergoing metamorphosis," explains Naudin. For the eminent 
			botanist, Adam was not one man, however, but mankind, 
			"which remained concealed within a temporary organism . . . . 
			distinct from all others and never contracting alliance with any of 
			these." He shows the differentiation of sexes accomplished by "a 
			process of germination similar to that of Medusae and Ascidians." 
			Mankind, thus constituted physiologically, "would retain a 
			sufficient evolutive force for the rapid production of the various 
			great human races."  De Quatrefages criticises this position in the "Human 
			Species." It is unscientific, he says, or, properly 
			speaking, Naudin's ideas "do not form a scientific theory," inasmuch 
			as primordial Blastema is connected in his theory with the
			First Cause, which is credited with having made potentially 
			in the Blastema all past, present, and future beings, and thus of 
			having in reality created these beings en masse;
			moreover, Naudin does not even consider the secondary 
			Causes, or their action in this evolution of the organic world. 
			Science, which is only occupied with Secondary Causes, has thus 
			"nothing to say to the theory of Naudin" (p. 125).  Nor will it have any more to say to the occult teachings, which 
			are to some extent approached by Naudin. For if we but see in his 
			"primordial Blastema" the Dhyan-Chohanic essence, the Chhaya
			or double of the Pitris, which contains 
			within itself the potentiality of all forms, we are quite in accord. 
			But there are two real and vital differences between our teachings. 
			M. Naudin declares that evolution has progressed by sudden leaps and 
			bounds, instead of extending slowly over millions of years; and his 
			primordial Blastema is endowed only with blind instincts -- a kind 
			of unconscious First Cause in the manifested Kosmos -- 
			which is an absurdity. Whereas it is our Dhyan Chohanic 
			essence -- the causality of the primal cause which 
			creates physical man -- which is the living, active and 
			potential matter, pregnant per se with that animal 
			consciousness of a superior kind, such as is found in the ant and 
			the beaver, which produces the long series of physiological 
			differentiations. Apart from this his "ancient and general process 
			of creation" from proto-organisms is as 
			occult as any theory of Paracelsus or Khunrath could be.  Moreover, the Kabalistic works are full of the proof of this. The
			Zohar, for instance, says that every type in the visible 
			has its prototype in the invisible Universe. "All that which is in 
			the lower (our) world is found in the upper. The Lower and the Upper 
			act and react upon each other." (Zohar, fol. 186.) Vide 
			infra, Part II., "Esoteric Tenets corroborated in every 
			Scripture."  20. THEIR FATHERS WERE THE 
			SELF-BORN. THE SELF-BORN, THE CHHAYA 
			FROM THE BRILLIANT BODIES OF THE LORDS, THE 
			FATHERS, THE SONS OF TWILIGHT 
			(a).  (a) The "shadows," or Chhayas, are called the 
			sons of the "self-born," as the latter name is applied to all the 
			gods and Beings born through the WILL, whether of Deity or Adept. 
			The Homunculi of Paracelsus would, perhaps, be also given 
			this name, though the latter process is on a far more material 
			plane. The name "Sons of Twilight" shows that the "Self-born" 
			progenitors of our doctrine are identical with the Pitris of the 
			Brahmanical system, as the title is a reference to their mode of 
			birth, these Pitris being stated to have issued from Brahma's "body 
			of twilight." (See the Puranas.)  21. WHEN THE RACE BECAME OLD, THE OLD WATERS 
			MIXED WITH THE FRESHER WATERS (a); WHEN THE DROPS BECAME 
			TURBID, THEY VANISHED AND DISAPPEARED, IN THE NEW STREAM, IN THE HOT 
			STREAM OF LIFE. THE OUTER OF THE FIRST BECAME THE 
			INNER OF THE SECOND. (b). THE OLD WING 
			BECAME THE SHADOW, AND THE SHADOW OF THE WING (c).
			 (a) The old (primitive) Race merged in the second race, 
			and became one with it.  (b) This is the mysterious process of transformation and 
			evolution of mankind. The material of the first forms -- shadowy, 
			ethereal, and negative -- was drawn or absorbed into, and thus 
			became the complement of the forms of the Second Race. The 
			Commentary explains this by saying that, as the First Race was 
			simply composed of the astral shadows of the creative progenitors, 
			having of course neither astral nor physical bodies of their own -- 
			this Race never died. Its "men" melted gradually away, 
			becoming absorbed in the bodies of their own "sweat-born" progeny, 
			more solid than their own. The old form vanished and was absorbed 
			by, disappeared in, the new form, more human and physical. There was 
			no death in those days of a period more blissful than the Golden 
			Age; but the first, or parent material was used for the formation of 
			the new being, to form the body and even the inner or lower 
			principles or bodies of the progeny.  (c) When the shadow retires, i.e. when the 
			astral body becomes covered with more solid flesh, man develops a 
			physical body. The "wing," or the ethereal form that produced its 
			shadow and image, became the shadow of the astral body and its own 
			progeny. The expression is queer but original.  As there may be no occasion to refer to this mystery later, it is 
			as well to point out at once the dual meaning contained in the Greek 
			myth bearing upon this particular phase of evolution. It is found in 
			the several variants of the allegory of Leda and her two sons Castor 
			and Pollux, which variants have each a special meaning. Thus in Book
			XI. of the Odyssey, Leda is spoken of as the spouse 
			of Tyndarus, who gave birth by her husband "to two sons of valiant 
			heart" -- Castor and Pollux. Jupiter endows them with a marvellous 
			gift and privilege. They are semi-immortal; they live and die, each 
			in turn, and every alternate day; [[eteremeroi*]]. As the 
			Tyndaridae, the twin brothers are an astronomical symbol, and stand 
			for Day and Night; their two wives, 
			Phoebe and Hilasira, the daughters of Apollo or the Sun, 
			personifying the Dawn and the Twilight.** Again, in the allegory 
			where Zeus is shown as the father of the two heroes -- born 
			from the egg to which Leda gives birth -- the myth is entirely 
			theogonical. It relates to that group of cosmic allegories in which 
			the world is described as born from an egg. For Leda assumes in it 
			the shape of a white swan when uniting herself to the Divine 
			Swan.*** Leda is the mythical bird, then, to which, in the 
			traditions of various peoples of the Aryan race, are attributed 
			various ornithological forms of birds which all lay golden eggs.**** 
			In the Kalevala (the Epic Poem of Finland), the beauteous 
			daughter of the Ether, "the Water Mother," creates the world in 
			conjunction with a "Duck" (another form of the Swan or Goose, 
			Kalahansa), who lays six golden eggs, and the seventh, "an egg of 
			iron," in her lap. But the variant of the Leda allegory which has a 
			direct reference to mystic man is found in Pindar***** only, with a 
			slighter reference to it in the Homeric hymns.****** Castor and 
			Pollux are in it no longer the Dioscuri (of Apollodorus
			III. 10, 7); but become the highly significant symbol 
			of the dual man, the Mortal and the Immortal. Not only this, but as 
			will now be seen, they are also the symbol of the Third Race, and 
			its transformation from the animal man into a god-man with only an 
			animal body.  Pindar shows Leda uniting herself in the same night to her 
			husband and also to the father of the gods -- Zeus. Thus Castor is 
			the son of the Mortal, Pollux the progeny of the Immortal. In the 
			allegory made up for the occasion, it is said that in a riot of 
			vengeance against the Apherides******* Pollux kills Lynceus 
			-- "of all mortals he whose sight is the most penetrating" -- but 
			Castor is wounded by Idas, "he who sees and knows." Zeus 
			puts an end to the fight by hurling his thunderbolt and killing the 
			last two combatants. Pollux finds his brother dying.******** In his 
			despair he calls upon Zeus to slay him also. "Thou canst not die 
			altogether," answers the master of the Gods; "thou art of a divine 
			race." But he gives him the choice: Pollux will either remain 
			immortal, living eternally in Olympus; or, if he would share his 
			brother's fate in all things, he must pass half his existence 
			underground, and the other half in the golden heavenly abodes. This 
			semi-immortality, which is also to be shared by Castor, is accepted 
			by Pollux.* And thus the twin brothers live alternately, one 
			during the day, and the other during the night.**  Is this a poetical fiction only? An allegory, one of those "solar 
			myth" interpretations, higher than which no modern Orientalist seems 
			able to soar? Indeed, it is much more. Here we have an allusion to 
			the "Egg-born," Third Race; the first half of which is 
			mortal, i.e., unconscious in its personality, and having 
			nothing within itself to survive***; and the latter half of which 
			becomes immortal in its individuality, by reason of its fifth 
			principle being called to life by the informing gods, and 
			thus connecting the Monad with this Earth. This is Pollux; while 
			Castor represents the personal, mortal man, an animal of 
			not even a superior kind, when unlinked from the divine 
			individuality. "Twins" truly; yet divorced by death forever, unless 
			Pollux, moved by the voice of twinship, bestows on his less favoured 
			mortal brother a share of his own divine nature, thus associating 
			him with his own immortality.  Princess Diana's Death 
						 Her grave, on the "Round Oval", on the 
						island in the lake. A path with 36 oak-trees, marking each 
						year of her life, is leading to the "Round Oval". 
						Originally the family-animals were buried on this 
						island, including Diana´s favorite cat Marmalade. The 
						oak and limetrees on the island are planted by the 
						family, also by Diana herself. White Rambling roses are 
						planted all over. At the end of the island stands an urn 
						from Portland stone. Four black swans are swimming in 
						the lake, symbolizing sentinels guarding Diana's grave. 
						In a dream Charles Spencer saw this vision. In the water 
						there are several water lilies. White roses and lilies 
						were Diana's favorite flowers. 
						 Such is the occult meaning of the metaphysical aspect of the 
			allegory. The widely spread modern interpretation of it -- so 
			celebrated in antiquity, Plutarch tells us,**** as symbolical of 
			brotherly devotion -- namely, that it was an image borrowed from the 
			spectacle of Nature -- is weak and inadequate to explain the secret 
			meaning. Besides the fact that the Moon, with the Greeks, was 
			feminine in exoteric mythology, and could therefore hardly be 
			regarded as Castor -- and at the same time be identified with Diana 
			-- ancient symbologists who held the Sun, the King of all sidereal 
			orbs, as the visible image of the highest deity, would not have 
			personified it by Pollux, a demi-god only. **** Castor's tomb was shown in Sparta, in days of old, says 
			Pausanias (III., 13, 1); and Plutarch says that he was 
			called at Argos the demi-mortal or demi-hero [[mizarchagetas]]. 
			(See Plutarch, Quaestiones Graecae, 23.)  **** The Monad is impersonal and a god per se, 
			albeit unconscious on this plane. For, divorced from its third 
			(often called fifth) principle, Manas, which is the horizontal line 
			of the first manifested triangle or trinity, it can have no 
			consciousness or perception of things on this earthly plane. "The 
			highest sees through the eye of the lowest" in the manifested world;
			Purusha (Spirit) remains blind without the help of Prakrit 
			(matter) in the material spheres; and so does Atma-Buddhi without 
			Manas.  If from Greek mythology we pass to the Mosaic allegories and 
			symbolism, we shall find a still more striking corroboration of the 
			same tenet under another form. Unable to trace in Genesis 
			the "Egg-born," we shall still find there unmistakably the 
			androgynes, and the first three races of the Secret Doctrine hidden 
			under most ingenious symbology in the first four chapters of 
			Genesis.  THE DIVINE HERMAPHRODITE.
			 An impenetrable veil of secrecy was thrown over the occult and 
			religious mysteries taught, after the submersion of the last remnant 
			of the Atlantean race, some 12,000 years ago, lest they should be 
			shared by the unworthy, and so desecrated. Of these sciences several 
			have now become exoteric -- such as Astronomy, for instance, in its 
			purely mathematical and physical aspect. Hence their dogmas and 
			tenets, being all symbolised and left to the sole guardianship of 
			parable and allegory, have been forgotten, and their meaning has 
			become perverted. Nevertheless, one finds the hermaphrodite in the 
			scriptures and traditions of almost every nation; and why such 
			unanimous agreement if the statement is only a fiction?  It is this secrecy which led the Fifth Race to the establishment, 
			or rather the re-establishment of the religious mysteries, in which 
			ancient truths might be taught to the coming generations under the 
			veil of allegory and symbolism. Behold the imperishable witness to 
			the evolution of the human races from the divine, and especially 
			from the androgynous Race -- the Egyptian Sphinx, that riddle of the 
			Ages! Divine wisdom incarnating on earth, and forced to taste of the 
			bitter fruit of personal experience of pain and suffering, generated 
			under the shade of the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil -- a 
			secret first known only to the Elohim, the SELF-INITIATED, "higher 
			gods" -- on earth only.*  In the Book of Enoch we have Adam,** the first divine androgyne, 
			Moon, conceived as twins . . . The Sun, the immortal and powerful 
			being that disappears every evening from the horizon and descends 
			under the Earth, as though he would make room for the fraternal orb 
			which comes to life with night, is Pollux, who sacrifices himself 
			for Castor; Castor, who, inferior to his brother, owes to him his 
			immortality: for the Moon, says Theophrastus, is only another, but 
			feebler Sun." (De Ventis 17. See Decharme, p. 
			655.)  Adam (Kadmon) is, like Brahma and Mars, the symbol of the 
			generative and creative power typifying Water and 
			Earth -- an alchemical secret. "It takes Earth and Water to create a 
			human soul," said Moses. Mars is the Hindu Mangala, the planet Mars, 
			identical with Kartikeya, the "War-God," born of 
			Gharma-ja (Siva's sweat) and of the Earth. He is 
			Lokita, the red, like Brahma also and Adam. The Hindu Mars is, 
			like Adam, born from no woman and mother. With the Egyptians, Mars 
			was the primeval generative Principle, and so are Brahma, 
			in exoteric teaching, and Adam, in the Kabala. See also: 
			THE ORPHIC THEOGENY DIONYSUS  
	 by T. Apiryon Article by Richard and Catherine Clark Kroeger Although we may idealize the early church, most of us would not have 
	enjoyed a visit to a worship service at Corinth. The impression which one 
	was most likely to receive was that of chaos and delirious insanity: So if the whole congregation is assembled and all 
	are using the 'strange tongues' of ecstasy, and some uninstructed persons or 
	unbelievers should enter, will they not think you are mad? 
	(1Corinthians 14:23, NEB) Greeks considered madness an important aspect of worship. Women in 
	particular responded to Bacchus (also known as Dionysus), the god of 
	madness; 'him of the orgiastic cry, exciter of women, Dionysus, glorified 
	with mad honors'. (Plutarch, Moralia 671c Ancient Corinth was 
	a center of Dionysiac worship, and Pausinius, world traveler of the second 
	century of our era gives this description: In the market-place, for most of the temples are there, is the 
		Ephesian Artemis, and there are two wooden statues of Dionysus, gilt 
		except the faces, which are painted with red paint, one they call Lysian 
		Dionysus and the other Dionysus the Reveler. The tradition about these 
		statues I will record. Pentheus, they say, when he outraged dionysus, 
		among other acts of reckless daring actually at last went to mount 
		Cithaeron to spy on the women, and climbed up into a tree to see what 
		they were doing; and when they detected him, they forthwith dragged him 
		down, and tore him limb from limb. And afterwards, so they say at 
		Corinth, the Pythian priestess told them to discover that tree and pay 
		it divine honors. And that is why these statues are made of that very 
		wood. (Description of Greece, II.ii; tr. A.R. Shilleto) There was in Corinth, then, a significant monument memorializing the 
	savagery of female Bacchus worshippers. Nor was such a feminine ferocity 
	confined to Pentheus alone. Women under the inspiration of Bacchus were said 
	to have torn Orpheus limb from limb; and Alexander the Great was supposed to 
	have incorporated a group of these maenads (mad women) into his army in his 
	attempt to conquer India. There was also a tradition that women during the 
	course of the worship tore apart young animals and ate them raw, warm and 
	bleeding, thereby receiving within themselves the life of the god. In a 1976 
	address to the Mystery Religions Division of the Society of Biblical 
	Literature, Ross Kraemer argued that there is evidence that women 
	participated in a second level of initiation in Bacchic worship that was not 
	available to men. Among Dionysiac worshippers, writes Livy in his 
	History of Rome, 'the majority are women' (XXXIX.xv) While women were famed for their wildness in the Bacchic cult and in 
	certain other mystery cults, other aspects of their worship were more 
	traditional. Of special importance to the study of the situation Paul 
	addresses is the concept of clamor, noisy outbursts of religious 
	pandemonium. Strabo (first century) explains how popular writers describe 
	the phenomenon: They represent them, one and all, as a kind of inspired people and as 
		subject to Bacchic frenzy, and, in the guise of minister, as inspiring 
		terror at the celebration of the sacred rites by means of war-dances 
		accompanied by uproar and noise and cymbals and drums and also by flute 
		and outcry . . . (Georg., X, 3:7) The 'sounding gong and tinkling cymbal' used in such worship are 
	mentioned in a derogatory sense in 1 Corinthians 13:1; but the religious 
	outcry itself is dealt with more directly. It is essential that we 
	understand that much of the shouting involved in the rite was the specific 
	function of women. Euripides describes the advent of Dionysiac religion to 
	Thebes thus: 'This city, first in Hellas, now shrills and echoes to my 
	women's cries, their ecstasy of joy' (Bacchae, 11, 20-24) The 
	word used here for 'cry' is olulugia, defined by the Etymologicum 
	Magnum as 'the sound which women make to exult in worship' and by E.R. 
	Dodds as 'the women's ritual cry of triumph or thanksgiving'. Pausanias 
	tells of 'the mountain they say was called Eva from the Bacchic cry 'Evoe' 
	which Dionysus and his attendant women first uttered there' (Descr. of 
	Greece, IV, xxxi) Menander also demonstrates women's role in 
	worship: 'We were offering sacrifice five times a day, and seven serving 
	women were beating cymbals around us while the rest of the women pitched 
	high the chant (olulugia)' (Fragment 326). Women were expected, then, 
	to provide certain types of sound-effects; and some of these effects seem to 
	have been limited to feminine ministrants. Apart from savagery and shouting, ancient writers usually describe 
	worshipers of Dionysus as engaging in dancing, drinking, sexual promiscuity, 
	varying degrees of undress, and other forms of excessive behavior. It was 
	only in frenzy that one could hold communion with the god, or - in ecstasy 
	so great that the soul seemed to leave the body - to become one with him. There are significant indications that the old pagan religion still 
	exerted a powerful influence on the recent converts at Corinth. They were 
	uncomfortable over meat that had been offered to idols (8:1-13), and they 
	had to be reminded not to attend sacrificial meals in pagan temples (10:20, 
	21) As in Bacchic feasts, there was drunkenness at the Lord's Supper and 
	ecstatic madness at the worship services. A surprising description comes 
	from the pen of the neo-Platonist Iamblichus as he explains the mystery 
	cults, the popular religions of the day, for Dionysus was not the only god 
	who inspired frenzy: It is necessary to investigate the causes of the divine frenzy 
		(madness). These are illuminations that come down from the gods, the 
		inspirations that are imparted from them, and the absolute authority 
		from them, which not only encompasses all things in us but banishes 
		entirely away the notions and activities which are peculiarly our own. 
		The frenzy causes words to be let fall that are not uttered with the 
		understanding of those who speak them; but it is declared, on the 
		contrary, that they are sounded with a frenzied mouth, the speakers 
		being all of them subservient and entirely controlled by the energy of a 
		dominant intelligence. All enthusiasm is of such a character, and is 
		brought to perfection from causes of such a kind. (The Egyptian 
		Mysteries, tr. Alexander Wilder. pp. 119f.) Too often we regard speaking in tongues as a purely Christian phenomenon, 
	but it was known in the ancient ecstatic religions; and Aristophanes in 
	Frogs mentions 'the tongue of Bacchos' (357). While a heathen 
	might babble without consciousness of what he was saying, there is no 
	indication that speaking a known language without prior instruction was 
	practiced outside of a Christian context. On the Day of Pentecost, such 
	languages were part of the kerygmatic proclamation of the gospel. (Acts 
	2:4-11) In 1 Corinthians it is clear that the gift of ecstatic language is a gift 
	of the Holy Spirit (12:10). Yet it is also clear that the situation 
	described in 1Corinthians 14 lacked the control of the Spirit, and that 
	other, disruptive, elements were present. It is obvious that there could be 
	little sharing, because too many were trying to talk at once; and much of 
	what was being said required an interpreter to make it meaningful. Paul 
	insists that only two or three may talk in tongues at any one meeting, and 
	that they must have an interpreter. He who lacks an interpreter must keep 
	silence (vs. 28). It is more desirable to build up the church through 
	prophecy, and two or three may take turns prophesying. The person who holds 
	the floor must keep silence (vs. 30) if someone else has a new revelation to 
	share. The prophets must control themselves and respond to the group (vs. 
	32). For God is not the Lord of confused tumult (as was Bacchus) but rather 
	of peace (vs. 33). When the Corinthians had been 'carried away' (12:1f) in 
	the cult of 'dumb idols' they had felt themselves powerless to resist their 
	force and fury, but Paul's message here is one of self-control under the 
	influence of the Holy Spirit. If everyone feels impelled to speak at once, 
	it is not the work of God, 'who would have all things done decently and in 
	order (vs. 40) It is in this context of self-control that women are asked to subdue 
	themselves within the bounds of propriety (vs. 35). Although the 
	translations are rarely the same, the same Greek verb is used in both verses 
	32 and 35. Hupotasso, meaning to arrange or place under, is in the 
	middle voice, indicating that the person does this to him or herself. The 
	concept of self-control is brought out in most translations of verse 32. It is for prophets to control prophetic inspiration, for the God who 
		inspires them is not a God of disorder but of peace. New English Bible For the spirits of speakers (in tongues) are under their control (and 
		subject to being silenced as may be necessary). For He (Who is the 
		source of their prophesying) is not a God of confusion and disorder but 
		of peace and order. As (is the practice) in all the churches of the 
		saints (God's people). Amplified New Testament The spirits of prophets are under their own control. Weymouth Prophets can always control their prophetic spirits since God is not 
		a God of disorder but of peace. Jerusalem Bible The spirit of a true preacher is under that preacher's control, for 
		God is not a God of disorder but of harmony, as is plain in all the 
		churches. J.B. Phillips The gift of speaking God's message should be under the speaker's 
		control. Good News for Modern Man The spirits of prophets are subject to the prophets. Revised Standard Version Remember that a person who has a message from God has the power to 
		stop himself or wait his turn. Living Bible When the subject is so clearly self-control, how can the same verb be 
	translated so differently in the very same passage when it applies to women? 
	Quite literally, verse 35 reads, 'Let them [women] control themselves, as 
	the law also says.' As women's behavior tended to be far wilder than that of 
	men, such legislation had been enacted in both Greek and Roman society. 
	According to Plutarch's Lives, Solon, in conjunction with 
	Epimenides (an expert in ecstatic religion), had established laws aimed at 
	curbing the cultic excesses of women. There was a special effort to restrain 
	women at nocturnal orgies with men - conditions which must have seemed to an 
	unbeliever not unlike those prevailing in the Corinthian worship service. 
	Cicero wrote in his Laws: Well, then, let us return to our laws, in which it is most diligently 
		ordained that the clear daylight should be the safeguard of female 
		virtue in the eyes of the multitude; and that they should only be 
		initiated in the mysteries of Ceres, according to the Roman custom. In reference to this topic, we have an extraordinary instance of the 
		severity of our ancestors in the public prosecution and punishment of 
		the Bacchanals by the senate, supported by the consular armies. And this 
		severity of the Roman government is not singular, since Diagonadas of 
		Thebes, in the middle of Greece, suppressed all nocturnal mysteries by a 
		perpetual prohibition. (II, xv; tr. C.D. Yange) Before the Roman senate passed stringent legislation limiting Bacchic 
	participation, matters were explained by the consul: In the first place, then, women form the great majority, and this was 
		the source of all the mischief. Then there are males, the very 
		counterparts of the women, committing and submitting to foulest 
		uncleanness, frantic and frenzied, driven out of their senses by 
		sleepless nights, by wine, by nocturnal shouting and uproar (Livy, 
		XXXIX, xv; tr. in David Balch's 1974 Yale PhD thesis Let Wives be 
		Submissive) Phintys reported that the law of the city forbade any woman to 
	participate in the orgies of the Great Mother (Stobaeus, IV, 
	23.61), in an attempt to control improprieties. While biblical scholars have 
	vainly searched for such a law in Jewish tradition, there is considerable 
	evidence that every legal effort was made to control ecstatic feminine 
	behavior in Greco-Roman society. There is even more evidence that such 
	efforts sometimes failed. It can be seen, however, that it was important to 
	the early church that the behavior of their women should be above reproach 
	and within the bounds of the law, for the charge of Bacchic behavior was 
	hurled at the Christians by unbelievers (Origen, Contra Celsum, 
	viii) We turn next to a consideration of silence and speech as it is enjoined 
	in 1 Corinthians 14:34. We have already noted that one who speaks with 
	tongues but has no interpreter is asked to keep silence, as is the prophet 
	when someone else desires to speak. It is not a complete prohibition for 
	these individuals to share their gifts, but rather an instruction so that 
	all may understand and all may profit. Only one person at a time is to share 
	his revelation and only if it can be made meaningful to the congregation. The second important emphasis in the chapter is on meaning. Paul himself 
	would rather speak five comprehensible words than thousands which could not 
	be understood (vs. 19). He asks that those elements which are disruptive or 
	meaningless be silenced. In this was we may understand his dictum: The women should keep silence in the churches. For they are not 
		permitted to speak (Greek: lalein) (1 Corinthians 14:34, RSV) It cannot mean that women are not to speak at all, for they have been 
	given permission to pray and prophesy in 11:5 - provided they observe due 
	decorum. Nor can the directive be a prohibition against speaking in tongues 
	(14:39). Some other type of disruption must thus be under discussion. It may help us to understand that the Greek word lelein refers 
	primarily to utterance rather than to meaningful conversation. The term is 
	used repeatedly in chapter 14 to describe speaking in tongues. Phrynichus, 
	the ancient dictionarian, defined the term as 'to talk nonsense'. The word 
	is used of gossip, prattling, babbling, animal sounds, and musical 
	instruments. During the classical period, it usually was employed in a 
	contemptuous sense. Debrunner, writing in the Kittle-Friedrich 
	Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, states 'Lalein 
	can also be used quite objectively of speech when there is reference to 
	sound rather than than meaning. 'To what kind of utterance can St. Paul 
	refer? There were many types of vocalization in ecstatic rites. They have been heard to utter (different voices of equal strength, or 
		with great diversity and inequality) in tones that alternated with 
		silence; and again in other cases harmonious crescendo or dimenuendo of 
		tone, and in still other cases other kinds of utterance. (Iamblichus, 
		On the Mysteries, III, 4-6) We have already mentioned heathen rituals in which frenzied shouting was 
	expected from women and considered a necessary ingredient of the worship. 
	Rogers translates this hymn from Aristophanes' Lysistrata: Call upon Bacchus, afire with his Maenades [mad women]; Allala! Lalla! Lallala! Lallala! The word lelein is fundamentally an onomatopoetic one, meaning, as 
	Thayer's Lexicon puts it, to go 'la-la'. The Greeks shouted 
	'alala' both in worship and in war, and personified Alala as a deity 
	(Pindar, Fr. 208 [78]; Plutarch 2.3496). It was this same repetitive and 
	meaningless syllabification in pagan prayers which Jesus described: 'for 
	they think they shall be heard for their much speaking' (Matthew 6:7) New patterns of Christian worship appear to have been more difficult for 
	women to adopt than men, as they had not known the dignified rite of Apollo 
	or Zeus. For the most part, their religious expression had been accompanied 
	by extravagances of every sort. We may quote Iamblichus again: We affirm, accordingly, not only that the shoutings and choric songs 
		are sacred to the gods, each and all of them, as being peculiarly their 
		own, but likewise that there is a kindred relationship between them in 
		their proper order . . . and the peculiar usages of Sabazian worship 
		make ready for the Bacchic enthusiasm, the purifying of souls, and 
		deliverances from old incriminations, their respective inspirations are, 
		accordingly, different in every important particular. Thou seemest to think that those who are enrapt by the Mother of the 
		gods are males, for thou callest them, accordingly, 'Metrizontes' yet 
		that is not true, for the 'Metrizontesae' are chiefly women (op cit., 
		pp. 121-123 Such women must learn that they were purified not through shouting but 
	through the blood of Christ and through the washing of the water of the 
	Word. It was important that the service of worship become meaningful. Women 
	were encouraged to question their husbands at home, since the women had 
	usually been denied an opportunity for education while the men participated 
	vigorously in all manner of theological and philosophical debates. The 
	questions should be asked at home so that the conversation would not disrupt 
	the service. Neither was a woman to gossip or chatter with the other women 
	during the service - surely a great temptation, for Greek women were closely 
	confined to their homes. (On the rare occasions when they were allowed to 
	leave, they were liable to kick over all the traces) 'For it is awful for a 
	woman to gossip in church' - perhaps we should also add 'or on the sidewalk 
	in front of the church or on the telephone'. And does not the same apply to 
	men? 'For in Jesus Christ there is neither . . . male 
	nor female' (Galatians 3:28) More information on gender and the Bible can be found at
	
	http://www.cbeinternational.org 
	
	http://intelligentchristian.cwc.net/pandemonium_and_silence_at_corinth.htm
	 Philip K Dick writes:  But still, we must realize that the 
		universe although kind to us in its entirety (it must like and accept 
		us, or we would not be here; as Abraham Maslow says, "otherwise nature 
		would have executed us long ago") does contain grinning evil masks which 
		loom out of the fog of confusion at us, and it may slay us for its own 
		gain. We must be careful, however, of 
		confusing a mask, any mask, with the reality beneath. Think of the 
		war-mask which Pericles placed over his features: you would behold a 
		frozen visage, the grimness of war, without compassion -- no genuine 
		human face or person to whom you could appeal. And this was of course 
		the intention. Suppose you did not even realize it was a mask; suppose 
		you believed, as Pericles approached you in the fog and half-darkness of 
		early morning, that this was his authentic countenance. Now, this is 
		almost exactly how I described Palmer Eldritch in my novel about him: so 
		much like the war-masks of the Attic Greeks that the resemblance cannot 
		be accidental. Is, then, the hollow eyeslot, the mechanical metal arm 
		and hand, the stainless steel teeth, which are the dread stigmata of 
		evil -- is this not, this which I myself first saw in the overhead sky 
		at noon one day back in 1963, a description, a vision, of a war-mask and 
		metal armor, a god of battle? The God of Wrath who was angry with me. 
		But under the anger, under the metal and helmet, there is, as with 
		Pericles, the face of a man. A kind and loving man. My theme for years in my writing has 
		been, "The devil has a metal face." Perhaps this should be amended now. 
		What I glimpsed and then wrote about was in fact not a face; it was a 
		mask over a face. And the true face is the reverse of the mask. Of 
		course it would be. You do not place fierce cold metal over fierce cold 
		metal. You place it over soft flesh, as the harmless moth adorns itself 
		artfully to terrorize others with ocelli. This is a defensive measure, 
		and if it works, the predator returns to his lair grumbling, "I saw the 
		most frightening creature in the sky -- wild grimaces and flappings, 
		stingers and poisons." His kin are impressed. The magic works. I had supposed that only bad people wore 
		frightening masks, but you can see now that I fell for the magic of the 
		mask, its dreadful frightening magic, its illusion. I brought the 
		deception and fled. I wish know to apologize for preaching that 
		deception to you as something genuine: I've had you all sitting around 
		the campfire with our eyes wide with alarm as I tell tales of the 
		hideous monsters I encountered; my voyage of discovery ended in 
		terrifying visions which I dutifully carried home with me as I fled back 
		to safety. Safety from what? From something which, when the need was 
		gone for concealment, smiled and revealed its harmlessness. Now I do not intend to abandon my 
		dichotomy between what I call "human" and what I call "android," the 
		latter being a cruel and cheap mockery of the former for base ends. But 
		I had been going on surface appearances; to distinguish the categories 
		more cunning is required. For if a gentle, harmless life conceals itself 
		behind a frightening war-mask, then it is likely that behind gentle and 
		loving masks there can conceal itself a vicious slayer of men's souls. 
		In neither case can we go on surface appearance; we must penetrate to 
		the heart of each, to the heart of the subject. Probably everything in the universe 
		serves a good end -- I mean, serves the universe's goals. But intrinsic 
		portions or subsystems can be takers of life. We must deal with them as 
		such, without reference to their role in the total structure. The Sepher Yezirah, a Cabbalist 
		text, "The Book of Creation," which is almost 2,000 years old, tells us: 
		"God has also set the one over agaist the other; the good against the 
		evil, and the evil against the good; the good proceeds from the good, 
		and the evil from the evil; the good purifies the bad, and the bad 
		the good; the good is preserved for the good, and the evil for the 
		bad ones." Underlying the two game-players there is 
		God, who is neither and both. The effect of the game is that both 
		players become purified. Thus, the ancient Hebrew monotheism, so 
		superior to our own view. We are creatures in a game with our affinities 
		and aversions predetermined for us -- not by blind chance but by 
		patient, foresighted engramming systems which we dimly see. Were we to 
		see them clearly, we would abolish the game. Evidently that would not 
		serve anyone's interests. We must trust these tropisms, and anyhow we 
		have no choice -- not until the tropisms lift. And under certain 
		circumstances they can and do. And at that point, much is clear which 
		previously was occluded from us, intentionally. What we must realize is that this 
		deception, this obscuring of things as if under a veil -- the veil of 
		Maya, as it has been called -- this is not an end in itself, as if the 
		universe is somehow perverse and likes to foil us per se; what we 
		must accept, once we realize that a veil (called by the Greeks dokos) 
		lies between us and reality, is that this veil serves a benign purpose. 
		Parmenides, the pre-Socratic philosopher, is historically credited with 
		being the first person in the West systematically to work out proof that 
		the world cannot be as we see it, that dokos, the veil, exists. 
		We see very much the same notion expressed by St. Paul when he speaks 
		about our seeing "as if by the reflection on the bottom of a polished 
		metal pan." He is referring to the familiar notion of Plato's, that we 
		see only images of reality, and probably these images are inaccurate and 
		imperfect and not to be relied on. I wish to add that Paul was probably 
		saying one thing more than Plato in the celebrated metaphor of the cave: 
		Paul was saying that we may well be seeing the universe backwards. The extraordinary thrust of this thought 
		just simply cannot be taken in, even if we intellectually grasp it. "To 
		see the universe backwards?" What would that mean? Well, let me give you 
		one possibility: that we experience time backwards; or more precisely, 
		that our inner subjective category of experience of time (in the sense 
		which Kant spoke of, a way by which we arrange experience), our time 
		experience is orthogonal to the flow of time itself -- at right angles. 
		There are two times: the time which is our experience or perception or 
		construct of ontological matrix, an extensiveness into another area -- 
		this is real, but the outer time-flow of the universe moves in a 
		different direction. Both are real, but by experiencing time as we do, 
		orthogonally to its actual direction, we get a totally wrong idea of the 
		sequence of events, of causality, of what is past and what is future, 
		where the universe is going. FROM:
		Philip 
		K Dick 
	
	DREAMS ABOUT THE TRIPLE MALE TRINITY 
	
	DREAMS ABOUT THE TRIPLE GODDESSES 
	
	THE SYMBOLISM AND SPIRITUAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE NUMBER NINE 
	
	SIRIUS - THE DOG STAR - THE LOST AND MISSING STAR 
	
	DNA - PAST AND FUTURE 
	
	THE SACRED BIRDS 
	
	DREAM OF 33 
	
	The 7 Sisters of the Pleiades - THE BIG DIPPER 
	
	CHANTING
	[edit]
	Pacific
	
	[edit]
			
[edit]
	North America
	
	[edit]
	Maya
	
	[edit]
	Aztec
	
	[edit]
	US / Canada
			
		
	
	
[edit]
	South America
	
	[edit]
	West Africa
	[edit]
	Prohibition in 
	major religions
	
	[edit]
	Judaism
	
	[edit]
	Christianity
	
	[edit]
	Islam
	
	[edit]
	Eastern religions
	
	[edit]
	Allegations of 
	human sacrifice
	[edit]
	Contemporary 
	human sacrifice
	
	[edit]
	India
	
	[edit]
	Sub-Saharan Africa
	
	[edit]
	Chile
	
	[edit]
	Ritual murder
	[edit]
	In fiction
	[edit]
	See also
	
		
	
			 
	
			 
			![]()
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: 
			
			Human sacrifice 
		
		
	[edit]
	References
	
	[edit]
	Footnotes
	
			
	
			"Sacrifice 
			of the Mass". 
			
			Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 
			1913.
			
			Articles of Religion.
			
			Wikisource. Article XVIII—Of the Lord's Supper.
				
			
					 
			
					“ 
					
					After a rash of similar killings in the area — according to 
					an unofficial tally in the English language-language 
					Hindustan Times, there have been 25 human sacrifices in 
					western Uttar Pradesh in the last six months alone — police 
					have cracked down against tantriks, jailing four and forcing 
					scores of others to close their businesses and pull their
					
					ads from newspapers and television stations. The 
					killings and the stern official response have focused 
					renewed attention on tantrism, an amalgam of mysticism 
					practices that grew out of Hinduism.In India, case links 
					mysticism, murder – John Lancaster,
					
					Washington Post, 29 November 2003 
					
					” 
				
	[edit]
	Books
	
		
	
	[edit]
	Journal articles
	
		
	[edit]
	External links
	
	
		
	
			 
		
		 
			 
	
			 
		
				
			
					 
			
					 
				
	
		
	
			 
		
			PINDAR...........The Lizard King?????????? 
		
			
			Do you know the Lizard King????? 
			Is Pindar real????? 
			
			
			Reptilian 'Royalty' : Winged reptilians, with the 
			highest caste being the Albino type (similar to Pindar). 
			
			Reptoids : Wingless reptilians. They are the ones 
			described as having larger scales on their backs and three fingers 
			with an opposing thumb. 
			
			Greys : Described as being either drone-like slaves of 
			the reptilians or an extraterrestrial life-form allied to them.
			
			
			Humans : We're at the bottom, but why doesn't that 
			surprise me ? 
			
			The Reptilians are described as being between 5 and 12 feet tall. 
			There are several types. 
			
			Also from Icke's research: "Pindar attends the major 
			Satanic ceremonies in Europe and then flies to California for the 
			rituals there". 
			
			Later in the book (Biggest Secret), Icke says that "Pindar, the 
			'Marquis de Libeaux' travels in a white limousine (A 'code-white' is 
			a code understood by judges, police, the military etc and it means: 
			look the other way or do not prosecute this person)." 
			
			On page 453 of the same book, Icke states that " ... the Queen 
			makes cruel remarks about lesser initiates, but is afraid of the man 
			code-named 'Pindar' (the Marquis de Libeaux) who is higher than her 
			in Satanic rank. Pindar, apparently, bears a resemblance to Prince 
			Charles. Arizona Wilder says that Pindar is Charles' real father."
			
			
			Finally, Icke summises, along with Arizona Wilder, the possibility 
			that Princess Diana was pregnant at the time of her murder and that 
			the child could have been Pindar's rather than that of Dodi Fayed, 
			and the child was sacrificed in a ritual ceremony. Diana was 
			sacrificed because she would not cooperate with the organization.
			
			
			Icke insists that only one 'strain' of the reptilian race is 
			antagonastic towards us. To consider all reptilians 'evil' is 
			like considering all humans the same way. Patently false. 
			
			
			The Dutch government resigned this week under pressure brought on by 
			accusations that in 1995, over 7000 Boznia Muslims were executed by 
			Serbs while under the protection of Dutch troops. This was the worst 
			mass murder in Europe since WWII. Queen Beatrix, the Bilderburger 
			leader, witnessed the mass sacrifice as part of a ritual ceremony. 
			An interim government will run the small nation until the May 15, 
			2002 election.
					
				
						 
				
						 
					
			
			These are the top of the Illuminati organization. These are the 
			people that really run this world. The most powerful is Marquis de 
			Libeaux then
			followed by the Rothschild's {Bauer}, Bruce, Cavendish {Kennedy}, 
			deMedici, Hanover, Hapsburg, Krupps, Plantagenet, Rockefeller, 
			Romanov, Sinclair/ St. Clair, Warburg {delBanco}, and Windsor 
			families. These are the families that run the NWO and all the 
			stooges that work for them. They all worship Satan and they all take 
			part in human sacrifice and ritual child abuse. If you do your own 
			research you will see that these families have "bred themselves 
			since ancient times and they are obsessed with keeping their 
			bloodlines "pure". These are the sickest people on this planet and 
			their hold is going to be broken as the world "wakes-up" to their 
			murderous deception around the world. Remember the truth will set 
			you free! 
			'Seal of Mushezib-Ninurta, governor, son of Ninurta-eresh, 
			ditto, son of Samanuha-shar-ilani, ditto.' 
			Samanuha-shar-ilani was ruler of Shadikanni 
			(Arban in eastern Syria), in 883 BC, and an Assyrian vassal - 
			subject to the firm control of Assyria, 
			and enjoying the wealth and security that such political domination 
			provided.
			
			During this period, seal designs were often cut on hard stones using 
			cutting-wheels and drills.
			The image is similar to two wall reliefs from the throne room of 
			King Ashurnasirpal II 
			(reigned 883-859 BC) at Nimrud. The king, shown in mirror image, is 
			protected by 
			guardian genii sprinkling holy water from a bucket using what may be 
			a fir cone or sponge. 
			A stylized tree stands in the centre, symbolizing nature and the 
			land of Assyria. 
			Above is a god in the winged disc.
			
			Length: 4.9 cm
			Diameter: 1.7 cm
			
			Found by H.C. Rawlinson and acquired by The British Museum around 
			1852
			
			D. Collon, First impressions: cylinder seals in the Ancient Near 
			East (London, The British Museum Press, 1987), pp. 76-7, fig. 341
			
			A.H. Layard, Discoveries in the ruins of Nineveh and Babylon 
			(London, J. Murray, 1853), p. 603
			Draco
			What is the difference between reptilian full-bloods and reptilian 
			hybrids?
			Full-bloods are reptilians using a human form to hide their true 
			nature; hybrids are reptile-human crossbreed bloodlines who are 
			possessed by the reptilians from the forth dimension
			The Caucasus mountains
			The Khattiyo 
			The Caucasus mountains
			The sun
			
			 
		
			 
		
			
			
					
				
						 
				Genesis 3:15 
						"And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and 
						between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise they 
						head, and thou shalt bruise his heel." 
					
			
			 
		
		 
			 
		So would Eden be real? Not in the 
			literal sense, but an actual place that man was banished from 
			because of these reptoids? 
		
			
			 
		Pindar.......the lizard king 
		
			
			It is said that the garden of 
			Edan was not on this planet and that we have been planted and the 
			reptoid were our jailers?
			
			 
		On the subject of Reptoids and such, are 
			any of you familiar with the statuettes from the Jarmo excavation? 
			Reptilian people doing ordinary things, nursing babies, etc....and 
			they also made them of regular people, so, combined with the 
			ordinary activities they are depicted doing, not likely to be idols 
			or anything of the sort.... 
		
			
			 
		
			 
		
				
			
					 
			
					Some basic info here: 
				
					
					
					http://www.anthro.mankato.msus.edu/archaeology/sites/middle_east/jarmosite.html
					
					It's 7000 BC actually, and in Iraq....so probably largely 
					destroyed by now 
					
			 
		
			 
		
				
			
					 
			
					The stories about reptilian visitors extend from India, to 
					Mexico, to China, back to North America, and Russia, and 
					even many parts of Africa and South America. 
				
					
			 
		There are a lot of links to Jarmo and 
			these lizard people and many other early cultures of the with 
			similar traditions. The Jarmo statuettes are the closest thing to 
			hard evidence. It goes without saying, in a world full of skeptics, 
			any bits of hard evidence are priceless.  
		
			 
	
			If you want to know more about Pindar or these Reptilians go to 
			David Icke's website 
			http://www.davidicke.com 
		
	
			 
		
			 
		
			David Icke's Biggest Secret book has a photo of this statue.. 
			This one is also from Iraq, but from the Ubaid area. It appears to 
			be a reptilian suckling one of its offspring. The Ubaid period was 
			from 5500 - 4000 B.C. 
				
			
			
			
 
			
			As for Pindar, Icke translates the name as meaning Penis of the 
			dragon and states that the (Pindar) is also known as the Marquis 
			of Libeaux. At the time he was writing the book, Icke had little 
			else to say about this particular reptilian other than stating that 
			he is above the Windsors in the Brotherhood heirarchy. 
			
			
			 
	
			 
		
				
			
					 
			
					 
				Jarmo
					
Jarmo 
					is an archeological site located in northern Iraq on the 
					foothills of the Zagros Mountains. For a long time it was 
					known as the oldest known agricultural community in the 
					world, dating back to 7000 BC. It is also one of the oldest 
					Neolithic village sites to be excavated. It was first found 
					in 1940’s by the Iraqi Directorate of Antiquities, which 
					later recommended the site to Robert Braidwood of the 
					Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. He had been 
					asking about ancient villages in the Middle East for a study 
					he was conducting. Under the Oriental Institute, Braidwood 
					excavated the site at different times from March 1948 until 
					June of 1955. He wanted to find out more about the origin of 
					food production. The Jarmo archeological site was one of the 
					first means of documentation for the way of life of 
					civilization's first farmers and herders.
There 
					were approximately 100 to 150 people who lived in the 
					village. Twenty permanent mud-walled houses, with stone 
					foundations, tauf walls, and reed bedding, housed the 
					residents of Jarmo. The people reaped their grain with stone 
					sickles, stored their food in stone bowls, and possessed 
					domesticated goats, sheep, and dogs. They also grew emmer 
					and einkorn wheat, barley, and lentils. In addition to their 
					agriculture, they also foraged for wild plants such as the 
					field pea, acorns, pistachio nuts, and wild wheat. The later 
					levels of settlement contained evidence of domesticated pigs 
					and clay pottery. Since many of their tools were made of 
					obsidian from beds 300 miles away, a primitive form of 
					commerce must have existed. Bone tools, especially awls, 
					were abundant from the site. Carefully made bone spoons and 
					beads were also found.
				
			
					 
			
				 
		
	
			 
		This account is based on notes that I took from the 3 hour 
			video. This video was made by David Ike and Bridge of Love 
			publications
			 
		
			
It 
			is called 'Revelations of a Mother Goddess' [a title 
			given to this lady - one of 3 in the world] and also accompanies 
			David Icke's detailed exposition of this subject called 'THE 
			BIGGEST SECRET'
			
			According to the Mothers of Darkness, the satanic cult based in 
			Brussels who train and educate the MK child slaves as they are 'born 
			to the blood' - the Aryan bloodline is Alien to this planet - they 
			were a Race fleeing the Reptiles and got here 4000BC - then started 
			mixing with the locals. Red hair, Blonde hair, blue eyes they may 
			have been of great stature as recent excavations of the 8 foot tall 
			Firbolg Knights in Eire suggest.
			
			Then, the Reptilian species - who have according to Giza plain 
			mathematics have come from the Serpens star cluster [serpens caput 
			and serpens cauda both of 7 stars] arrived in 2000BC and as record 
			would have it - infiltrated the Human race and its social structure 
			and began the hybridisation experimentation. One of which was the 
			foundation of the Merovingian Dynasty [born out of half man and half 
			'fish'].
			
			There 
			are 13 bloodlines from this kind of stock, and all of them have to a 
			greater or lesser degree the capacity to play host to the Shape 
			Changer Reptiles. The known shape shifting in human mythology goes 
			back to North Africa, Tibet, Maya, Rome [called versae pellis 
			effect].
			
			The Reptile species is apparently on a loser because it had been 
			brought into being in a very tenuous way.
			
			Its mission is to bring its ancestors [thought of as daemons] out of 
			an abyss from which they cannot escape [Cthulu mythos etc] and seek 
			to open up a gate or portal Yog Sothoth to enable them to do so. For 
			this, they need lots of pure aryans.
			
			The occult ritual and ceremony [satanic/druidic etc] they perform on 
			Aryan sacrifices serves several purposes.
			
			Because the Reptiles allegedly cannot call up their lost mates from 
			the abyss, they need the magical/spiritual properties of the Aryans 
			to do the ceremony for them. They turn up - after ritual has been 
			rigourously followed, and give their special team of shape changers 
			in this dimension encouragement to carry on looking for the way to 
			go with the escape of the 'demons' from their abyss. Various 
			MK-slaves are there, some get eaten some get 'orgied' - flesh and 
			blood is devoured especially that of the sacrifice - a female whose 
			combination of blood; preferred menstrual [thats why satanic/druidic 
			ritual goes with the full moon] - and with the secretion from the 
			pineal gland stimulated by intense fear, the sacrifice drives the 
			Reptiles wild with carnage.
			
			The pineal gland or third eye in human terms is an alien piece of 
			biochemistry in the human race - as any biochemistry text book will 
			tell of its reptilian biochemistry - so it leads us to wonder 
			whether or not the Aryan Race was a phase 2 hybrid created by the 
			Shape Changing reptiles so that they could colonise this sector of 
			the '3' dimensional cosmos.
			
			Reptiles could do with a pineal gland - because they want its 
			mystical powers, but it looks like they have been unable to 
			integrate this organ into their own being - as it gives access to 
			dimensions of incredible energy and spiritual purity that would be a 
			bit off-putting to a species hell bent on slaughter. The Reptiles 
			are trying to bring through the 'Old Ones' in fact as characterised 
			by HP Lovecraft in 'the Dunwich Horror'.
			
			They have a hypnotic gaze which fixes the victim - in a trance of 
			terror - which promotes secretion of the pineal gland - at that 
			point, they cannot hold human form any longer and shape shift in 
			anticipation of supper. They have a pecking order at bloodfest 
			ceremonies, and seem to need more and more blood these days as the 
			planetary food supply is deteriorating in quality. [must be the 
			additives etc]
			
			They have therefore capitalised on every Druidic and Magical date to 
			try to get as much use out of the effect of the lunar cycle on 
			female menstrual blood. They call this aspect of the menstrual blood 
			Starfire, and indeed, one of the people in the UK Arizona Wilder 
			'fingers' as a Shape Shifter called lawrence Gardiner has written an 
			article about 'Starfire and menstrual blood' in Nexus magazine. he 
			is also behind the 'Order of the Dragon' an attempt to assemble and 
			register the pure bloodstock of the UK in London.
			
			A list of other people Arizona Wilder says that she has seen 
			shapeshift into Reptiles at these rituals;
			
			USA: Bush and 2 sons, Albright, Kissinger, Reagan and Nancy, J 
			Rockefeller, Ford, Carter and LB Johnson. EUROPE: Queen Mum, Queen 
			Liz II, Princess Margaret, Charles, Tony Blair, and prince Philip, 
			Zecharia Sitchin, Laurence Gardiner.
			
			The big International and Interstellar leader she says is a chap 
			called the Marquis de Libero - aka Pindar [phallus of the Dragon] 
			who provides superior seed to impregnate the specially bred Aryan 
			and Bloodline Children with - including - Princess Diana - who 
			brought forth Prince William - Pindar's son.
			
			In the underground vaults of his castle in the Alsace Region of 
			France, green glowing flourescent rocks turn stored menstrual blood 
			black to be used at that special ritual - whilst in the great heat, 
			clutches of Reptile Eggs incubate.
			
			The Queen Mother is second to Pindar/Libero and she is carried on a 
			rich ornate chair before she changes into something much bigger and 
			stronger. At the ceremonies, voluminous robes of red or purple 
			richly decorated with gold, sewn jewels, and embroidered 'fleur de 
			lis' are worn, not any human clothes for these would tear during the 
			shift.
			
			All the British House apparently have jewel encrusted goblets to 
			drink the blood from the symbolic female 'grail' and a symbolic 
			dagger to give it a bit of a stir. Arizona Wilder then went on to 
			describe the appearance of the British Royal family when they have 
			underwent the shape shift.
			
			The Queen mum is 8 feet tall, with a snout, and fangs. All have a 
			long tongue with hair-like protrusions - with claws for hands and 
			feet. They have scales and these seem to disappear into one another, 
			this, more pronounced on the back. Some have vestigial wings, all 
			have a tail usually kept curled which is whipped about when 
			agitated.
			
			The Queen Mum has a beige belly and more darkly speckled and mottled 
			brown from the head and spine. The body has protrusions running down 
			the spine. The eyes are large and round, protruding, varying in 
			colour from beige to yellow to yellow green - with a black vertical 
			slit for a pupil - the eyes can be hooded. Charles apparently has 
			two large protrusions just above where his human ears are.
			
			The Queen [Liz II] is much darker, all over much more homogenous in 
			marking, where the colours gradually and smoothly change to the 
			head, tail and back.
			
			Arizona Wilder says that the princess Diana death was a ritual 
			public sacrifice to usher in the Age of Horus [Egyptian magical 
			tradition - rebirth of the dead god Osiris]. Because the magicians 
			like to mirror dates, the dark goddess Hecate's number is 13, which 
			was why the 31st August was chosen. (The mirror effect of numbers)
			
			It was a mirror of a Isis, Osiris, Horus ritual because 3 people 
			died and the unborn baby Diana was carrying was the very special 3 
			months old. Apparently Baron Rothschild had to be in the tunnel at 
			the 13th pillar where the accident happened to take the soul of 
			Diana - and indeed an ambulance did arrive on the scene a minute 
			after the crash. The driver Henri Paul was Mind Controlled and 
			trained for the crash. Bits of Diana were then eaten by the 
			hierarchy. Arizona Wilder has said that some Spencers were there at 
			these Rituals, but that Diana would not attend - and that symptoms 
			of Bulemia and Anorexia were mind control techniques used on her.
			
			Wilder also said that the smell of Diana's periods would have caused 
			Charles to shape shift - especially whilst sleeping because the 
			Reptiles cannot retain their human form without concentration.
			
			Arizona Wilder came across as sincere with this disturbing account 
			and spoke of the hideous abuse to which herself and her children had 
			been subject. .
			
			Andrew Hennessey
			Transformation Studies Group
			Edinburgh Scotland 
			
			
			Who really controls world events from behind-the-scene? Years of 
			extensive research and investigation have gone into this massively 
			documented work. In this 624 page, large format book, Fritz 
			Springmeier discloses mind-boggling facts and never before revealed 
			truths about the top Illuminati dynasties. Discover the amazing role 
			these bloodlines have played—and are now wielding—in human history, 
			with family names such as 
			
			FROM: CABAL 
			OF CABALA 
			
			
			Page 229
			
			...in early 1998 when I was traveling around the United States....in 
			a period of about 15 days I met 12 separate people in different 
			locations, and from very contrasting walks of life, who told me the 
			same basic story of seeing a "human" change into a reptilian form 
			before their eyes. The people who told me these accounts included 
			two television interviewers who saw their guest, a supporter of the 
			New World Order agenda, shape-shift during a live interview. 
			Afterwards one said he had been shocked to see the man's face turn 
			reptilian and the other equally shocked, said she had seen his hands 
			take on a reptilian look.
			
			Page 230
			
			In Minneapolis, a gifted psychic lady told me she sees people in 
			power, like Henry Kissinger, George Bush, and Hillary Clinton, turn 
			into reptilians all the time.
			
			Page 241
			
			SHAPE-shifting queens
			
			Arizona Wilder (a recovered mind control sex slave, like Cathy 
			O'Brien, of Trance Formation of America book) told me how she had 
			conducted sacrificial rituals involving the British royal family, 
			Tony Blair, and famous American Illuminati names like George Bush, 
			Bill and Hillary Clinton, Henry Kissinger and many others.
			
			The highest operative she knew in the Illuminati, she said was a guy 
			calling himself the Marquis de Libeaux ("of the water"). His 
			codename was Pindar, which she says means "penis of the dragon". 
			Arizona told me how the Queen and Queen Mother regularly sacrifice 
			babies and adults at many ritual centres, including Castle in 
			Balmoral, Scotland, where they were staying at the time Diana was 
			ritually murdered in Paris.
			
			The royal family involved in human sacrifice was fantastic enough, 
			but here again came the constantly repeated theme. She described 
			how, during the rituals, these people shape-shift into reptiles. 
			Diane Gould, head of the US Organization, Mothers Against Ritual 
			Abuse, also confirms this theme. In a telephone conversation about 
			ritual abuse, Diane asked me if I could explain why many of her 
			clients reported that participants in their rituals had turned into 
			reptiles. People might want to dismiss all this, but they should 
			know that, while they close their eyes and their minds, children are 
			being sacrificed all over the world this very day by the reptilian 
			bloodlines --- many thousands of them on the main ritual dates. 
			Arizona talked about some of her experiences with Queen Mother:
			
			"The Queen Mother was cold, cold, cold, a nasty person. None of her 
			cohorts even trusted her. They have names an altar (mind-control 
			programme) after her. They call it the Black Queen. I have seen her 
			sacrifice people. I remember her pushing a knife into someone's 
			rectum the night the two boys were sacrificed. One was 13 and the 
			others 18. You need to forget that the Queen Mother appears to be a 
			frail woman. When she shape-shifts into a reptilian, she becomes 
			very tall and strong. Some of them are so strong they can rip out a 
			heart and they all grow by several feet when they shape-shift (This 
			is what the lady said who saw Edward Heath, among endless others.)"
			
			Of the Queen, Arizona said:
			
			"I have seen her sacrifice people and eat their flesh and drink 
			their blood. One time she got so excited with blood-lust that she 
			didn't cut the victim's throat from the left to the right in the 
			normal ritual. She just went crazy, stabbing and ripping at the 
			flesh after she shape-shifted into a reptilian. When she 
			shape-shifts, she has a long reptile face, almost like a beak and 
			she is an off-white colour. (This fits many descriptions of the gods 
			and the "bird gods" of ancient Egypt and elsewhere.) The Queen 
			Mother looks basically the same, but there are differences. She (the 
			Queen) also has bumps on her head and her eyes are very frightening. 
			She's very aggressive..."
			
			"...I have seen (Prince Charles) shape-shift into a reptilian and do 
			all of the things the Queen does. I have seen him sacrifice 
			children. There is a lot of rivalry between them for who gets to eat 
			eat what part of the body and who gets to absorb the victim's last 
			breath and steal their soul. I have seen Andrew participate and I 
			have seen Prince Phillip and Charles sister (Anne) at the rituals, 
			but they didn't participate when I was there. When Andrew 
			shape-shifts, he looks more like one of the lizards. The royals are 
			some of the worst. Ok, as far as enjoying the killing, enjoying the 
			sacrifice, and eating the flesh, they are some of the worst of all 
			of them. They don't care if you see it. Who are you going to tell, 
			who is going to believe you? They feel that it is their birthright 
			and they love it. They love it."
			
			PAGE 136--137 gives a long list of VERY prominent world leaders and 
			people from all walks of life--that are documented Illuminati 
			figures and many of them shape-shifters. The names of some of these 
			will surely ASTOUND you....
			
			Obtain THE BIGGEST SECRET, and CHILDREN OF THE MATRIX from Global 
			Light Network at: 1-888-236-2108, or browse our website at:
			
			www.global-light-network.com 
			
			"THE WINDSOR-BUSH BLOODLINE
			Bush~Windsor~Piso Bloodline
			
			The Rothschilds, Rockefellers, the British royal family, and the 
			ruling political and economic families of the US and the rest of the 
			world come from these SAME bloodlines. This is why the so called 
			Eastern Establishment families of the United States interbreed with 
			each other as obsessively as the European royal and "noble" families 
			have always done. And similar families across the world. It is not 
			because of snobbery, it is to hold as best they can a genetic 
			structure - the reptilian-mammalian DNA combination which allows 
			them to "shape-shift".
			
			You will also see references on the site to "shape-shifting", the 
			phenomena in which witnesses have reported seeing people (most often 
			those in positions of power), transform before their eyes, from a 
			human form to a reptilian one and then back again. You will find 
			much about this in The Biggest Secret and Credo Mutwa confirms 
			exactly the same experience in black Africa. Once again, ancient and 
			modern accounts support each other. The ancient gods of the Indus 
			Valley, the Nagas, were said to have been able to take either human 
			or reptilian form.
			
			Former US president, George Bush, incidentally, is mentioned more 
			than any other person in my experience in relation to 
			shape-shifting. This is why his son is being brought through in the 
			2000 presidential election.
			
			Presidents are not EL-ected by ballot,they are SEL-ected by blood".
			
			
			 
		On Fri, 7 May 1999 - spirit@canada.com writes: IUFO Mailing List
			 
		
			Sen. Arlen Specter, Al Gore, Queen Elizabeth, Prince Philip, the 
			Queen Mother (a Den Mother), Madeleine Albright (US Den Mother),
			
			Prince Charles, Prime Minister Tony Blair et al. 
			 
		FROM Dan Winter: 
			http://www.zayra.de/soulcom/invasion/
			
			 
		
				
			
			 
	
			(Pages 43-50; Size: 22K)
			
			
			FROM:
			
			http://www.wisdomworld.org/additional/ListOfCollatedArticles/TheTimelessKabiri.html
				held pantheons to be immoral II 764
			
			
				----- Hymn to Jupiter
			
				Kabir Adamas first man II 3
			
				----- Hymn to Minerva
			
				Minerva on Jupiter's right hand I 401
			
				----- Nemean Odes
			
				Castor & Pollux II 122, 123
				Gods & men of common origin II 270
			
				----- Olympian Odes
			
				Pherecydes [Pherenicus?] on Hyperboreans II 775
			
				----- Pythian Odes
			
				Aetna a celestial pillar II 763
			
					
				
						 
				
						 
					

 
	Copyright © 1995, 1999 Ordo Templi Orientis. All rights reserved.
	
	Also known as Bacchus, Iacchus, Bassareus, Trietenicus and Liber. Thracian 
	god of ecstasy, terror, guilt and atonement, death and resurrection, 
	vegetation, trees, wine, madness, and drama. Crowley thought Dionysus was 
	"probably an ecstatic from the East," and one of the principle models for 
	the syncretic legend of Christ. Herodotus places the birth of Dionysus 
	(i.e., his appearance in Greece) at c. 1600 b.c.e. See Krishna, Chapter 71 
	of Liber Aleph, Part III of The Heart of the Master, Chapter 7 of The Book 
	of Lies, and The Book of Thoth, II:0. Both Dionysus and his father Zeus are 
	closely associated with the earlier Phrygian deity named Sabazios.
	
	In the Orphic theogony (which differs substantially from the more well-known 
	cosmogony of Homer and Hesiod), Dionysus appears successively in three 
	forms: Phanês-Dionysus, the bisexual god of Light, burst from the silver egg 
	of the cosmos (the so-called Orphic Egg is sometimes depicted as an egg girt 
	with a serpent) at the beginning of time. Phanês was also known by the names 
	of Protogonos, Ericapaeus, Eros and Mêtis ( a name previously applied to the 
	Titaness who presided over the planet Mercury). Alone, Phanês created a 
	daughter, Nyx (Night), with whom he begot Gê or Gaia (Earth) and Ouranos or 
	Uranus (Heaven). These begot the Fates, the Centimani, the Cyclôpes (who 
	built the world), and the Titans, with their leader Cronus (Saturn). In the 
	revolt of the Titans against Uranus, Cronus became ruler of the World, and 
	begat the gods. The leader of the gods, Zeus, wrested rulership of the world 
	from Cronus by eucharistically swallowing his great-grandfather Phanes 
	(Metis), assimilating his power. Zeus then took the form of a serpent and 
	begot the second Dionysus, Dionysus-Zagreus, the Horned Child, upon his 
	daughter Persephonê.
	
	Zeus bequeathed rulership of the world and the underworld upon his son while 
	he was still a child, even setting him upon the great throne and letting him 
	hold the lightening-bolt scepter. This aroused the envy of the Titans and of 
	his wife, Hêra. Hêra bribed the guards whom Zeus had entrusted to protect 
	the child (the Kourêtes), and distracted the child with toys and a looking 
	glass. While Zagreus was beholding his own face in the looking glass, the 
	Titans, ceremonially smeared with white gypsum, entered and attacked him, 
	tearing him to pieces and devouring him. Enraged, Zeus destroyed the Titans 
	with his thunderbolt, and from their ashes, commingled with those of 
	Dionysus-Zagreus, arose the human race. Humans are therefore of a dual 
	nature: the Dionysian divine nature imprisoned in the Titanic material 
	nature.
	
	Athena, goddess of Wisdom, had witnessed the murder of Dionysus-Zagreus and 
	had even managed to save his heart from the rage of the Titans. She brought 
	it, still beating, to her father Zeus. Zeus consumed the heart, as he had 
	previously consumed the Serpent-entwined Egg of Light of his 
	great-grandfather Phanês. He then came to Semelê, daughter of Cadmus (Semelê 
	was the Thracian word for "Earth") and begot upon her the third Dionysus, 
	known as Dionysus-Lyseus or Bakkhos, or simply as Dionysus. [Another version 
	of the legend has Athena preserving the heart of Zagreus within a small 
	figure she fashioned from the gypsum of the Titans, into which she breathed 
	life.] Dionysus was born on the winter solstice in a cavern in Mount Nusa 
	(one theory of the origin of the name Dionysus derives the name from words 
	meaning "God of Nusa"). Having been born twice, once as Zagreus and once as 
	Lyseus, Dionysus is known as Dithyrambos, the "twice-born."
	
	Hêra, always jealous of her mate's numerous lovers and their children, 
	disguised herself as Semelê's maidservant and convinced Semelê that she 
	deserved to behold Zeus in his true splendor. The next time she saw him, 
	Semelê tricked Zeus into swearing to grant her a wish; which was, of course, 
	that he reveal his true form to her. He reluctantly complied, and she was 
	instantly burned to ashes by the intolerable glory of his manifestation.
	
	Zeus placed Dionysus in the care of the Nysaean Nymphs, who nurtured him 
	through his childhood, and for which they were rewarded by Zeus by being 
	placed among the stars as the Hyades. [Another version of the legend states 
	that Zeus hid the child within his own thigh until the child had attained 
	puberty; an alternative theory of the origin of the name Dionysus derives 
	the name from Dios-nusos, "the nurseling of Zeus".]
	
	When fully grown, Dionysus discovered the methods of culturing the vine and 
	extracting and fermenting its juice; but Hêra, ever jealous, struck him with 
	madness and caused him to aimlessly wander the earth. Walking one day on the 
	shore on an island in the Greek Archipelago, he was abducted by Tyrrhenian 
	pirates, who mistook him for the son of a rich king and expected a heavy 
	ransom. They carried him aboard their ship and attempted to bind him with 
	ropes; but the knots untied themselves and the ropes fell to the deck. The 
	sea around the ship turned to wine, and a vine began to grow up the mast. 
	The god assumed the form of a lion or panther, and the pirates, in terror, 
	leapt overboard and were transformed into dolphins.
	
	In Phrygia, he was cured of his madness by the Great Mother Goddess, his 
	grandmother Rhea (also known as Cybelê, Bona Dea and Magna Mater), who 
	initiated him into her mysteries. He then set out to teach viticulture and 
	to establish his cult among the peoples of the world.
	
	He marched through Syria, Lebanon, Caucasian Iberia (modern Georgia), India, 
	Egypt and Libya accompanied by a retinue of his votaries, dancing 
	ecstatically and shouting the mystic word "euoi" (Latinized as the familiar 
	"evoe"). His votaries included the female maenads or bacchantes, tattooed, 
	clad in fox-skins and playing frame-drums or cymbals; the male satyrs, clad 
	in panther-skins and bearing thyrsi (a thyrsus was a rod tipped with a pine 
	cone, with streamers of ivy); and Silenus, his fat, aged, drunken companion 
	and keeper, riding on an ass. Despite his slovenly appearance and his 
	perpetual drunkenness, Silenus possessed immense knowledge and wisdom, and 
	was greatly respected by the votaries of Dionysus.
	
	The worship of Dionysus was savage and ecstatic, his votaries participated 
	in orgia in which live animals (usually a spotted fawn, a goat, an ox or a 
	bull) were torn apart and devoured raw. It was believed that the god entered 
	the worshippers and possessed them through this Eucharist of living flesh, 
	called the Omophagia. Animal skins and masks were worn, and a bull-roarer 
	(rhombus) was used to simulate the thundering of Zeus.
	
	As Dionysus and his retinue traveled the world spreading his cult, those who 
	accepted him were rewarded with ecstasy. Those who opposed him were stricken 
	with madness, and brought down by the hideous results of their own deranged 
	atrocities. After establishing his cult across the known world, he returned 
	to Greece, bringing his orgiastic Phrygian rites with him. He was not well 
	received. Pentheus, king of Thebes, had him arrested, tried, scourged and 
	thrown into prison. For this, Dionysus drove all the women of Thebes mad, 
	including Agave, Pentheus's mother. They became maenads, and went out into 
	the hills to conduct their Dionysian orgies. Pentheus imprudently followed 
	them. Agave and her companions detected the spy, and in wild rage they fell 
	upon him and tore him to pieces. Thus was Hellas converted to the religion 
	of Dionysus; and Dionysus moved on.
	
	On the island of Naxos, Dionysus discovered a girl weeping on the rocks. It 
	was Ariadnê, the daughter of the Cretan king Minos, who had just been 
	abandoned by Thêsêus. Dionysus fell in love with her; they wedded, and had 
	many children.
	
	Dionysus crowned his exploits by descending into the Underworld to recover 
	his mother, Semelê. He took her to Olympus where she was ever after 
	worshipped as Thyonê.
	
	Many scholars believe that the Greek dramatic tradition ultimately 
	originated in the ecstatic rites of Dionysus. The dramatic tradition is 
	known to have originated in the Hellenic Mystery Schools, and the first of 
	these schools was that of the Orphic Mysteries, which incorporated 
	civilized, allegorical versions of the Dionysian rites into their system.
	
	The ram, the dolphin, the serpent, the tiger, the lion, the lynx, the 
	panther, the ox, the goat and the ass are sacred to Dionysus; and his 
	symbols were the phallus, the bull and the thyrsus. According to Forlong, 
	the Greek letters I.H.S. were carved over his shrine.
	
	References:
	
	Crowley, Aleister; The Book of Lies [1913], Samuel Weiser, NY 1978
	Crowley, Aleister; The Book of Thoth [1944], Samuel Weiser, NY 1969/74
	Crowley, Aleister; The Heart of the Master [Ordo Templi Orientis, 1938], New 
	Falcon Publications, Scottsdale, Arizona 1992
	Crowley, Aleister; The Gospel According to Saint Bernard Shaw [1916], 
	Stellar Visions, San Francisco 1986
	Crowley, Aleister; Liber Aleph vel CXI, The Book of Wisdom or Folly [Thelema 
	Publishing, 1962], Samuel Weiser, York Beach, Maine 1991
	Forlong, J.G.R.; Faiths of Man, a Cyclopaedia of Religions [Bernard 
	Quaritch, 1906], University Books, NY 1964
	Frazer, James G.; The Golden Bough; the Roots of Religion and Folklore 
	[1890], Avenel Books, NY 1981
	Gaster, Theodor H.; The New Golden Bough, a New Abridgement of the Classic 
	Work by Sir James George Frazer; Mentor Books, NY 1959
	Graves, Robert; The Greek Myths, Volume I, George Braziller, NY 1959
	Guirand, F.; "Greek Mythology" in The New Larousse Encyclopedia of 
	Mythology. Hamlyn, NY 1959/1968
	Harrison, Jane Ellen; Themis; a Study of the Social Origins of Greek 
	Religion [1912/1927], University Books, NY 1962
	Herodotus; The Histories [c. 430 b.c.e.], transl. by Aubrey de S‚lincourt 
	[1954]; revised, with an introduction and notes by A.R. Burn; Penguin, 
	London 1972
	Mead, G.R.S.; The Orphic Pantheon, The Alexandrian Press, Edmonds, 
	Washington 1984
	Ovid; Metamorphoses, translated by Rolfe Humphries, Indiana University 
	Press, Bloomington 1955/1973
	Puhvel, Jaan; Comparative Mythology, Johns Hopkins University Press, 
	Baltimore 1987
	Robinson, Herbert Spencer and Knox Wilson; The Encyclopedia of Myths and 
	Legends of All Nations, Kaye & Ward, London 1962
	Wili, Walter; "The Orphic Mysteries and the Greek Spirit" [1944] in The 
	Mysteries, Papers from the Eranos Yearbooks, Bollingen Series XXX.2, edited 
	by Joseph Campbell, Princeton/Bollingen, Princeton NJ 1955/1978
	Zimmerman, J.E.; Dictionary of Classical Mythology, Harper & Row, NY 1964
	
	8/23/99
	
	Originally published in Red Flame No. 2 -- Mystery of Mystery: A Primer of 
	Thelemic Ecclesiastical Gnosticism by Tau Apiryon and Helena; Berkeley, CA 
	1995 e.v. 
	Pandemonium and Silence at Corinth
	
		
	
		
	
		
	
		
	
		
	
	
		
	
		
	
		
	
		
	
		
	
		
	
		
	
		Call upon Zeus in the lightning arrayed; Call on his queen, ever 
		blessed, adorable;
		Call on the holy, infallible Witnesses,
		Call them to witness the peace and the harmony,
		This which divine Aphrodite has made. 
		Whoop for victory, Lallalalae!
		Evoi! Evoi! Lallala, Lallala!
		Evae! Evae! Lallalalae.
		
	
	
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
			
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		A Nostradamus quatrain, C2, Q28, along with dream-visions and 
		"coincidences" seem to suggest that recent events surrounding the death 
		of Princess Diana are related: 
		
		"The last son of the man with the Prophet's name
		Will bring Diana to her day of rest.
		At a distance they wander in frenetic grief
		Delivering a great people from ruin." 
		
		Dodi Fayed's father is self-made billionaire Mohamed Al-Fayed!
		
		Maureen B. Roberts, PhD, had a great visionary experience at the time of 
		Diana's death. It is now on-line at: 
		
		The Diana Myth - From Fairytale Princess to Grail Queen,
		by Maureen Roberts, Ph.D.
		
		In Maureen's experience, Diana corresponds to The Queen of Hearts of the 
		Arthurian Tarot Deck, who is The Grail Queen.
		
		FROM: 
		http://www.greatdreams.com/eclipse.htm 
		
	... or Great Unite - and a number of other things, my 
	sense is that the "Y" represents
	the "goddess" with three ... Kali Yantra http://www.greatdreams.com/kaliyan.jpg.
	...
	www.greatdreams.com/drmpns.htm
	... The one on the top was "Roseanne (she called 
	herself a 'domestic goddess') on
	her comedy show. ... .
	www.greatdreams.com/drmgds.htm
	... It is to be noticed, by the way, that 1+6+5+6 = 
	18, which is twice 9, while
	4+3+2=9: 9 being a number traditionally associated with the Goddess 
	Mother of the ...
	www.greatdreams.com/nine/nine.htm
	... pointed to the star Sirius, circa 2450 BC Sirius 
	was associated with the Egyptian
	goddess Isis and ... NOTE: See this page: http://www.greatdreams.com/dogstar.htm.
	...
	www.greatdreams.com/dogstar.htm
	... The most notable characteristics of this period 
	are the "sitting goddess figurines"
	indicating a goddess-worshipping culture and the distinctive colored
	...
	www.greatdreams.com/dna_past_future.htm
	... 1. O ye gods, if the pigeon, dispatched as the 
	messenger of Nirriti (the goddess
	of destruction), hath come here seeking (us out), we shall sing his praises
	...
	www.greatdreams.com/alex/sacred-birds.htm - 101k -
	
	... The faithful representative on earth, the good 
	lady, the goddess Isis searched for
	her brother who was also her husband until she found that the coffin had 
	...
	www.greatdreams.com/33drm.htm
	... Other versions made them the attendants of 
	Artemis, goddess of wildlife and of hunting,
	who were pursued by the giant hunter Orion, but were rescued by the ...
	www.greatdreams.com/pleiades/7sisters.htm
	... texts. Chants of modern witches and Neo-pagans 
	consist names of the Goddess
	and Horned God plus names of other pagan deities. The ...
	www.greatdreams.com/chanting.htm
		
	
			 
	... She chanted a sweet song to 
			the God/Goddess Shimeekah. ...  
		
			15.The Triple Goddess (many mythologies) represent Maiden, 
			Mother, and Crone. ...
			www.greatdreams.com/earthy_trigon.htm - 12k -
			
| ... They say it was once a 
			Pagan place of worship to the goddess Diana. .... www.greatdreams.com/aware.htm  | 
		
| updated 10-24-03. 1961 - 1997. "Your 
			candle's burned out long before your legend ever will" . www.greatdreams.com/princess.htm  | 
		
| ... See also information on the 
			religious item known as the Djed.  The goddess was typically portrayed as a woman who wears on her head a vase of water . ... www.greatdreams.com/osiris.htm  | 
		
	
	DREAMS AND ARTICLES ABOUT ROYALTY, PRINCE WILLIAM, PRINCESS DIANA ...
	... They say it was once a Pagan place of worship to 
	the goddess ... http://www.greatdreams.
	com/show11.htm DEES DREAMS AND VISIONS - JFK, JR. PLANE CRASH. ...
	www.greatdreams.com/royalty/royalty.htm
	
	The American Tragedy: A Symbolic Event, Part One
	... http://www.greatdreams.com/Events/9_11_01/Amertrag.htm 
	The American Tragedy: A Symbolic ...
	later called the 'Great Keyhole' as 'The Earth Goddess' by researcher
	...
	www.greatdreams.com/Events/9_11_01/Amertrag.htm
	
	The American Tragedy: A Symbolic Event, Manifest Revelation
	... The location was used in ancient times as a place 
	of worship of the moon goddess
	Diana, the ... Princess Diana of Wales http://www.greatdreams.com/princess.htm.
	...
	www.greatdreams.com/Events/9_11_01/Amtrgrev.htm
	
	The American Tragedy: A Symbolic Event, Part Two
	... The giant bird waiting must be the female aspect, 
	Mother Goddess. ... I would think
	the mother was a Mother Goddess figure, but I'm not sure. ...
	www.greatdreams.com/Events/9_11_01/Amertrg2.htm
	
	DEATHWALKING WITH DIANA
	... following several Dreams of Diana - of the 
	connection between her and the Grail
	Queen, and by the later intuition of Diana and the reawoken Goddess 
	in general ...
	www.greatdreams.com/diana.html
	
	DREAMS, VISIONS, PROPHECY AND COINCIDENCES ABOUT PRINCESS DIANA
	... Diana is the Roman goddess Artemis. She is 
	the moon goddess and twin of Apollo. ... They
	say it was once a Pagan place of worship to the goddess Diana. ...
	www.greatdreams.com/dianpro.htm
	
	DREAM OF THE BEAUTIFUL MAN AND THE TRAP
	... Sumerian myths. The Egyptian Goddess Isis, 
	who is sometimes depicted as
	a mermaid, is also linked with the star Sirius. The Nommos ...
	www.greatdreams.com/et.htm - 40k - 
	
	DONUT (DOUGHNUT) SHAPED CLOUDS - THE DREAM AND THE REALITY
	... FROM: http://www.greatdreams.com/skycirc.htm.
	... in other ancient civilizations --
	Babylonia’s Oannes, Acadia’s Ea, Sumer’s Enki, and Egypt’s goddess 
	Isis. ...
	www.greatdreams.com/donut.htm
	
	DREAMS OF SKY EVENTS
	... Other Goddess Mother figures may also 
	represent Her, such as, The Divine Sophia,
	Isis, Ishtar, Sakti, and ... See: http://www.greatdreams.com/lessons/schldays.htm.
	...
	www.greatdreams.com/sky.htm
	
	DREAMS AND VISIONS OF THE HOLY GRAIL AND THE SECOND COMING OF ...
	... The anticipated return of the 'bridegroom' and 
	reunion with the Mother Goddess is
	the mystery hidden behind the "Wedding at Cana" of the Gnostic Fourth Gospel
	...
	www.greatdreams.com/holygrl.htm
	
	THE REPTILIANS - WHO ARE THEY REALLY?
	updated 4-18-04 THE REPTILIANS. WHO ARE THEY REALLY? . 
	www.anw.com/kesara.
	"Drawing by Kesara as described by Pamela Stonebrooke". ...
	www.greatdreams.com/reptlan/reps.htm
	
	THE SYMBOLISM OF UFOS/ET EVENTS
	... Mother Goddess myths seem to have this 
	idea. "The Keys of Enoch", tells of a
	light-being that appeared to scientist JJ Hurtak in the early 1970's. ...
	www.greatdreams.com/joeufo/ufosym.htm
	
	'SARAH' - A DREAM WITHIN A DREAM
	... themselves. The numbers coded by gematria in her 
	name indicate that Mary
	Magdalene was the "Goddess" among early Christians. They ...
	www.greatdreams.com/sarah.htm
	
	TESTIMONY TO TRUTH
	... eating. In Egypt to eat of the tree of ASHERAH 
	was to eat the flesh of the
	mother goddess and to gain knowledge of the tree of life. ...
	www.greatdreams.com/sacred/testimony.htm
	
	THREE DREAMS AND A BABY
	... Horus personified the rising Sun according to 
	ancient Egyptian mythology. Horus
	was the son of Osiris, the god of air and earth and the goddess Isis.
	...
	www.greatdreams.com/3baby.htm
	
	TRICK OR TREATING - WHAT IT REALLY IS
	... The Egyptians revered the cat as an aspect of the
	goddess, Bast, and they mummified
	cats with all the ritual, pomp and circumstance that befitted such regal 
	...
	www.greatdreams.com/tricks.htm
	
	DREAMS: WHAT'S GOING ON?
	... 4-13-99 - DREAM - This was a lucid dream which 
	lasted all night. The one name I
	remember from the page was Hecate who is the goddess of the 
	underworld. ...
	www.greatdreams.com/whtson.htm
THIS BLOG CONTINUES ON PAGE 139
http://www.earthmountainview.com