143 The Invisible Universe
Date: 02/05/04
The root of the Dark Matter / Dark Energy Problem can be summed up in these quotes from Scientific American Magazine.
In the first quote it was said that galactic gas moves about but does not escape, which science assumes to be held by gravity of the rest of the system, so more matter was needed. All one can say about this is "What holds a tornado together?" In the second quote one can only ask, "Why does the universe look like a balloon being blown up?" If you can answer these questions, you can solve the Dark Matter / Energy Problem. I believe the theory is based upon a faulty major premise and is nonexistent, and even Scientific American Magazine mentions, "electrons are antimatter" so there are also no dark fields of invisible antimatter, however, the ratios are interesting.
Science studies say dark energy is 25%36% of the invisible total of universe leaving the balance to dark matter, estimated to be from 60%73%, minus visible matter at 15%. These estimates are hovering around the same ratios found in atomic charges, namely, 1/3 (33%) and 2/3's (66%).
Ratios of 1/3rd and 2/3rd's are as coincidental as the ratios of the coincidences of 10^40 ^{6} or perhaps the ratios should be interpreted as Robert Fludd or Heninger interpreted them in the Music of the Spheres and The Divine Monochord as the "diapason proportion 3/1 and the diatesseron as 3/2." ^{40} or the ratios might be considered as triplets or triads. ^{47}
Lets construct a major premise, for the very first time, and admit that:
The universe should reveal a visible/invisible ratio (99 : 1) of 1/3 (33%) dark energy plus 2/3's (66%) darkunconsciousenergy against visible matter (1%). This whole invisible component (99%) being composed of 2 components called energy and primal unconsciousness (ECU's, energy/consciousness units ^{2}) in an unknown ratio. There is no dark matter, only energy and grades of unconsciousness/consciousness. If it is matter, it is visible and dead.(02/05/04, Grace)
At the time that I was watching the Dark Matter / Dark Energy estimates from various sources, go up and down in percentage, I was comparing Commee's 15 elements ^{3} and the atomic charge ratios 1/3 and 2/3 with certain music scales ^{4} in sets of 7. After trying, for a while, with the binary notation, I found that 14 scales (double sets of 14 pairs), below, fit nicely with a little intelligent adjustment, into the 15 elements of the atomic charges, using the most perfectly balanced pair of scales (Dorian/Dorian) to represent the most perfectly balanced pair of consciousness units (ecu's), the electron and photon. Sciences notation, in the Table below, seems to imply that electrons are in this dimension (charge ratio 1) and the photons are in the "other" dimension (charge ratio 0). However, I believe all light quanta are in the "other" dimension. The neutrino, with a charge ratio of 0, may represent the beginning of an unknown, higher octave, in the "other" dimension, the neutrino and antineutrino being related to gravity. The neutrino is also empty of scales, at this time, however, with more study we may again assign the Dorian/Dorian neutral to the neutrino, with its charge ratio 0, just as photon was. Also, this perfect symmetry of the Dorian/Dorian scale, describing light quanta, is complimented by the intrinsic asymmetry and unbalance of the other pairs of scales.
On the atomicscale, the 1/3rd and 2/3rds ratios that are assigned to certain atomic "particles", I also interpreted as charge ratio. This seems to tell us that there is an invisible part of universe that has two invisible parts:
On the cosmicscale, science says nearly the same thing about dark matter, which hovers around (2/3, 66%) and dark energy hovers around (1/3, 33%).
One part (1/3) ^{53} of the atomic and cosmic universe is occasionally detectable, and one part (2/3) is twice as massive in energy potential or has two other components, both are mostly invisible, the quarks of each invisible part can only be detected for an instant before disappearing again, into the dark void, so most of universe's energy/mass/consciousness can't be seen, except for an instant. One visible smallpart (1%) can always be detected as matter.
Moreover, all socalled mass may simply be energy because science admits that "energy has mass" which is what science is slowly coming to believe today: All matter is a wave...of energy...and little do they know....an unconscious potential, so this leaves us with what Quartum Organum ^{8} calls, the two primaries that work together, energy and consciousness, which I call the energy/consciousness units or ecu's, of the basic toroidal building blocks of universe, far smaller than hypothetical quarks. Consciousness at the level of the void is unqualified and unconscious: J.Iuliano calls it "pure mindenergymatter." ^{45} Consciousness only appears in its highest form, in qualified human civilization as the epitome of universes purpose. And yes, the universe has a potential unconscious purpose. It is only in humans that conscious purpose manifests.
To introduce musical order into atomics, by using the double sets of 14 pairs of scales, we will have to form another major premise upon which other minor premises rely:
Atomic components should symmetrically and asymmetrically arrange themselves to conform to the double sets of 14 pairs of symmetric and asymmetric scales. Tests should find correspondence between atomic charge ratio and musical ratio. (02/05/04, Grace)
To answer a question that has mystified science but can be demonstrated with the double sets of 14 pairs of scales, Premise 3 explains "intrinsic spin" and external "angular momentum" and why the electron has such a strange spin 1/2 double rotation, which is what the double sets of 14 pairs of music scales also do, upon the surface of a torus that can accommodate 7 colors ^{7} maximum:
The smallest unit of space is a toroidal vortex ^{5} which is already a 4D object. If we rotate a point through dimensions 1, 2, 3 and 4, we assume we have 4 dimensions. However, if we realize that the hypothetical point is already a 4D torus, the resulting rotation will be a 8 dimensional object. This is the reason our common electron is called spin 1/2 which is said to rotate 2 times to return to its start point. (02/05/04, Grace)
Intrinsic spin is 4 rotations and angular momentum is 4 rotations. Not only does one light path rotate through 8 dimensions but that same light path rotates through 8 dimensions in a directly opposite manner (counterbary) to the first light path similar to the counter light paths of DNA, which is what the helices are doing. This also seems to be the characteristic of subatomics, atomics, light, the Tzolkin, IChing, every largescale toroidal structure and the double sets of 14 pairs of scales. Each 14 socalled particles of the 15 notated in the Table, seems to have two pairs of 8 note scales associated with them, i.e., 16 notes for every socalled particle. These 16 notes seem to say 2 octaves per particle or 2 rotations through 2 octaves, in 2 directions at the same time, which is similar to the 2 mysterious rotations of the electron. This rotation of "double light" (288 <<< see the double 8 mobius?) over the surface of each spinning vortex "particle" works along with precession ^{9} of socalled particles, also demonstrated as a spinwave. ^{10}
These major premises are subsets of Trinary Relativity ^{1} and can be mapped upon the torus.
In the Table below, this charge ratio of 1/3rd to 2/3rds is presented with my estimate of how the double sets of 14 pairs of musical scales might align with atomic charge:
tonic  1:1  256:243  32:27  4:3  1024:729  128:81  16:9  2:1 
ratio  256:243  9:8  9:8  256:243  9:8  9:8  9:8 
tonic  1:1  9:8  81:64  728:512  3:2  27:16  243:128  2:1 
ratio  9:8  9:8  9:8  256:243  9:8  9:8  256:243 
tonic  1:1  9:8  32:27  4:3  3:2  27:16  16:9  2:1 
ratio  9:8  256:243  9:8  9:8  9:8  256:243  9:8 
tonic  1:1  256:243  32:27  4:3  3:2  128:81  16:9  2:1 
ratio  256:243  9:8  9:8  9:8  256:243  9:8  9:8 
tonic  1:1  9:8  81:64  4:3  3:2  27:16  16:9  2:1 
ratio  9:8  9:8  256:243  9:8  9:8  256:243  9:8 
tonic  1:1  9:8  32:27  4:3  3:2  128:81  16:9  2:1 
ratio  9:8  256:243  9:8  9:8  9:8  256:243  9:8 
If the 3 premises are correct, we should be able to see the charge ratio of each pair of components, agree with the pairs of music ratio and with cosmic ratio.
I have been looking around for well written summations that can demonstrate a very comprehensive overview of the invisible, atomic universe. I transferred them below, to see if we can find commonalities between sciences notation and the musical notation of the visible and invisible parts of universe:
Sections: Quasiparticles
PhysicsWeb ^{14}
Let's begin slowly and define "quasi".
Quasi means "The fractional charges are called quasiparticles." ^{20}
"An interesting theoretical prediction resulting from Laughlin's analysis is that if one adds an extra electron to the system in which the Landau level is already 1/3 full, the extra charge should appear in 3 separate places in the sample." ^{20}
"It is as if empty space behaves like a vast piece of superconducting metal." ^{21}
Let's ask what composite of octaves can create a charge of 1/5th ratio? Perhaps, any 5 note, chiactivating pent scale ^{42} found within the 7ths of the octave. How does the pent scale apply to the 1/7th ratio, the 2/5ths, the 3/5ths? Does 1/7 now indicate 1 part of the 7th note is the sum, product, dividend or subtrahend of some higher combination of octaves................does 2/5ths and 3/5ths mean 2 and 3 parts of the 5 note pent scale is the sum, product, dividend or subtrahend of some higher combination of octaves? Could all these 7's and 5's be "The 7 / 5 Ratio" ^{43}
Atomic Structure ^{15}
However, a proton has 3 fractional charges, at least.
However, a neutron has 3 fractional charges, at least.
The point here is the definition of "fractional charge" that seems to be in error. As to why it is in error, I brought this up on a previous page:
Musically speaking, we are dealing with two octaves of tones and semitones when referring to the proton or electron which science says are composites of "fractional charges," yet, science calls the total of the fractional charges: integral, whole numbers (1, 0, 1). This is similar to looking at a scale of notes of an octave and saying that the octave is an integral number of 8 notes but the 3rds, 6ths, 9ths and 12ths within it are "fractional." If the universe first produced a whole, integral octave, would any subsequent, reflected lower partials be called fractional or whole?
Begin with the first pair of Anu generating two octaves, then, the whole octave of the whole, holistic, holy, holo.graph of the closepacked toroidal Anu of space, pinging their wavefronts throughout the void. Where these uncountable wavefronts cross, there we have what looks like standing points of matter but these are more compressed wavefronts with new octaves of higher and lower partials of matter surrounding each new point. Each fractional parts of each octave, generates new whole octaves. A whole octave generates fractionals which generate whole octaves ^{37}......impossible? No.
I would call a fractional charge what it really is: A 1/3rd charge is 1/3 of an octave or a 3rd note. A 2/3rds charge is 2/3rds of an octave or a 6th note, assuming an 8 note octave oscillating around a 9(0) point. Here is another website where we can begin to see discovered subatomics divided up into 3rds, 6ths and 9ths and compared with the discovered atomic partners. ^{44}
Interpreted musically, we might say that a proton is the result of multiple octaves of wavefronts meeting at a center, leaving detectable 1/3 and 2/3rds ratios or the 3rd and 6th note of the final, standingwave composite of both forward and backward traveling octaves.
There are far more hienergy, "fractional energy" levels dynamically competing, intrinsically and internally to produce the final lowenergy, detected, net integral charges.
What happens if you believe that whole, integral charge protons or electrons came from fractional charges. This is exactly the same as believing that the "something" of universe came from the ex nihilo "no.thing". It didn't happen and it can't happen. In the beginning was, "the Whole Integral Charge."
What if the prime octave of universe was an Meantonal Tempered 31 Notes? It's almost an even 32 (8 octaves x 4). ^{32} For 31 notes, a 1/3 ratio would be exactly 10 1/3 steps. Do you think 10.33333333 is a whole integral or fractional number?
What if the prime octave of universe was the Mercator scale of 53 notes? It's almost an even 54 (8 octaves x 6.75). For 53 notes, a 1/3 ratio would be 17 plus a slice more than 2/3's (.666666667). Do you think 17.666666667 is a whole integral or a fractional number?
What if the prime octave of universe was the Diatonic scale of 72 notes which notes are necessary for it to fit the octave perfectly. This is a very gematric 72 (8 octaves x 9). ^{33} For 72 notes, a 1/3 ratio would be exactly 24. Do you think 24 is a whole integral or a fractional number? Do you think this relates, somehow, to the 72 names of God?
TRIPLET SUBSTRUCTURE OF QUARKS
Wikipedia ^{16}
Is this another division or the same division between leptons and hadrons?
Leptons = integral, hadrons = fractional.
Therefore, all hadrons have spin 1/2 or two times around to arrive at their beginning.
6 kinds of hadrons are known.
Name  Charge  Estimated mass (MeV) 

Up (u)  +2/3  1.5 to 4.5 ^{1} 
Down (d)  1/3  5 to 8.5 ^{1} 
Charm / Centre (c)  +2/3  1,000 to 1,400 
Strange / Sideways (s)  1/3  80 to 155 
Top / Truth (t)  +2/3  174,300 ± 5,100 
Bottom / Beauty (b)  1/3  4,000 to 4,500 
Further on, Jerry Iuliano comments that the top quark (hadron) is the center of 5 pentagonal quarks.
A proton, we might say, is made of a composite of at least two octaves, what should we say of the quarks within?
The other varieties of quarks are assumed to be upper harmonics of the UP and DOWN quarks, therefore they disappear as fast as the driving force disappears.
Lepton = electron = color = musical 3rds. 3 on the visible side + 3 on the invisible side....OR 3 intrinsically + 3 externally (angular momentum) + 2 time dimensions = 8 (octave).
Color = baryon = proton and neutron = 1/3 part = musical 3rds.
Meson = quark + antiquark = 1/3 against the other 1/3.
Particles of different color charge are attracted and repelled by the same color charge of the strong force, because..... like repels, different attracts.....just like charge. Quarks and gluons are the same charge, always being neutralized or balanced by a stronger charge = higher octave. Strong force = higher octave, holds quarks (1/3rds) together in mesons and baryons. Again the strong force points to a higher octave along with the higher octave of neutrino which represents gravitation, leading one to surmise that the strong force and gravity have commonalities.
Again, the strong force in hadronization or fragmentation acts in the production of higher harmonics that generates additional musical 3rd quarks and its antiquark, always in new pairs, which reinforce the existing 3rds as fractional quarks, however the similarity of the fractional charges cancel the waveform to neutral, which leads to the assumption that either the strong force, gravity or both, are neutral and perfectly balanced for how can an unbalanced force produce a balanced neutral cluster?
TRIPLET SUBSTRUCTURE OF QUARKS
Fractal Charge ^{17}
The strong force is also a triplet. Could this be the triune nature of Keely's Triple Current?
Technically, fractional charge is impossible. We simply don't understand. We associate "fractional" with the word "part". We think of "part" as incomplete. We should think of the word "part" as upper and lower partials of music.
Matter 
AntiMatter 

up = +2/3 
antiup = 2/3 

down = 1/3 
antidown = +1/3 
Fundamental or fractional. This is an absurd argument. We could say the same thing of whole octaves or whole numbers. Is 1 a fractional part of a group of 10 numbers? Is a 3rd a fractional part of an octave? Are the numbers we call integral, actually a fractional part of a higher group of numbers in another dimension?
Triplet = 3rds, 6ths, 9ths or 12ths.
Two sets = two octaves = 2 octaves for each charge = two sets (pairs) of 7 notes = 14 notes per "particle" = 14 notes per charge...28 total for every socalled pair of particles (cooper pairs)
Each particle (charge) has two pairs of 8 note scales associated with them, i.e., 16 notes for every socalled particle = 32 total for every socalled pair of particles (cooper pairs).
These 16 notes seem to say 2 octaves per particle or 2 rotations through 2 octaves, in 2 counterdirections at the same time, which is similar to the 2 mysterious rotations of the electron.
Normal and Negative Matter Accounting is the recognition of intrinsic spin and external angular momentum spin. A "normal matter quark" is the visible 3rds, 6ths, 9ths and 12ths.
An "antimatter quark" is the invisible 3rds, 6ths, 9ths and 12ths.
Each visible side has an equal invisible counterpart. However, the invisible part of the scientific accounting says it is opposite to the visible. In the musical scale hypothesis, there are also scales that move in opposite direction than their respective partners and also are minor to their respective Major scale partners.
Normal Matter Accounting 
AntiMatter Accounting 

Positive Matter Ratios  Negative Matter Ratios  Negative Matter Ratios  Positive Matter Ratios  
up = +2/3 
up = +1/3 
antiup = 2/3 
antiup = 1/3 

down = 1/3 
down = 2/3 
antidown = +1/3 
antidown = +2/3 
Now, the scientific explanation...
This is a little complicated, as designed.
Lets assume this means (+) and ().
ummm......say what?
Ut oh...only the "relevant?" Which half is irrelevant? That's like saying only Heaven is relevant, but not Hell.
Oh, I see...I think....
That's really clear now....umm hum...
Quarks ^{18}
Quarks form in 5's also. An infinite space full of quark 1/3rd charges? Hardly. Musically, space is full of whole strings of octaves.
The 3 part quark has 4 properties = 12 notes.
Different notes produce different quarks.
down charge = 1/3 spin = +1/2 mass = 39 MeV 
up charge = +2/3 spin = +1/2 mass = 15 MeV 
down charge = 1/3 spin = 1/2 mass = 39 MeV 
up charge = +2/3 spin = 1/2 mass = 15 MeV 
antidown charge = +1/3 spin = +1/2 mass = 39 MeV 
antiup charge = 2/3 spin = +1/2 mass = 15 MeV 
strange charge = 1/3 spin = +1/2 mass = 75170 MeV 
charm charge = +2/3 spin = +1/2 mass = 11501350 MeV 
bottom charge = 1/3 spin = +1/2 mass = 40004400 MeV 
top charge = +2/3 spin = +1/2 mass = 175000 MeV 
stable 
unstable 
plural unstable 
ADDING AND SUBTRACTING PICTOQUARKS
+  +  = 
up charge +2/3 spin 1/2 mass 3 MeV 
+ + 
up charge +2/3 spin +1/2 mass 3 MeV 
+ + 
down charge 1/3 spin +1/2 mass 6 MeV 
= = 
proton charge +1 spin +1/2 mass 938 MeV 
+  +  = 
up charge +2/3 spin +1/2 mass 3 MeV 
+ + 
down charge 1/3 spin 1/2 mass 6 MeV 
+ + 
down charge 1/3 spin +1/2 mass 6 MeV 
= = 
neutron charge 0 spin +1/2 mass 940 MeV 
Mass = energy content and it doesn't have to add up. Understanding entropic cascading energy and negentropy is helpful.
The two side are interlinked. What is done on this side affects the other side.
ABSOLUTE FOUR AND THE OCTAVE WAVE
Absolute Four and the Octave Wave ^{`9}
by Michael Henry
24 August 2000 18:30 UTC
Buckminster Fuller proves that there is an octave of eight magintudealtering sets of indigs which in turn disclose primary dichotomy into four positively altering and four negatively altering magnitude operators, with each set arranged in absolute arithmetical sequence of from one to four only. There are apparently no cosmically absolute numbers other than 1, 2, 3, and 4. This primitive fourness identifies exactly with one quantum of energy and with the fourness of the tetrahedron's primitive structuring as constituting the "prime structural system of Universe," i.e., as the minimum omnitriangulated differentiator of Universe into insideness and outsideness, which alone, of all macromicro Universe differentiators, pulsates insideoutingly and vice verse as instigated by only one force vector impinging upon it.
A parallel to B. Fuller's cosmically absolute numbers, above: "This Balmer formula may be derived by squaring each of the integers 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 by itself, thus obtaining the series 1, 4, 9, 16 and 25. ^{34}
Pulsative Octave: The interaction of all numbers other than nine creates the wave phenomenon described, i.e., the selfinvertible, selfinsideoutable octave increasing and decreasing pulsatively, fourfoldedly, and tetrahedrally. No matter how complex a numberaggregating sequence of events and conditions may be, this same number behavior phenomenon is all that ever happens. There is thus a primitively comprehensive, isotropically distributive, carrierwave order omniaccommodatively permeating and embracing all phenomena.
The recursive 19(0) is all that happens, however, it happens twice in one cycle. ^{41}
Not only is there an external zero intervalling between all the unique octavepatterning sets in every one of the four positive, four negative systems manifest, but we find also the waveintermodulating indigs within each octave always integrating sumtotally internally to the octaves themselves as nines, which is again an internal zero content  this produces in effect a positive zero function vs. a negative zero function, i.e., an insideout and outsideout zero as the ultracosmic zerowave pulsativeness.
Thus we discover the modus operandi by which radio waves and other waves pass uninterferingly through seeming solids, which are themselves only wave complexes.The lack of interference is explained by the crossing of the highfrequency waves through the much lowerfrequency waves at the noninterfering zero points, or indeed by the varifrequencied waves through both one another's internal and external zero intervals.
Pairing of Prime Numbers: I am fascinated by the fundamental interbehavior of numbers, especially by the behavior of primes. A prime cannot be produced by the interaction of any other numbers. A prime, by definition, is only divisible by itself and by one. As the integers progress, the primes begin to occur again, and they occur in pairs. That is, when a prime number appears in a progression, another prime will appear again quite near to it. We can go for thousands and thousands of numbers and then find two primes appearing again fairly close together. There is apparently some kind of companionship among the primes. Euler, among others, has theories about the primes, but no one has satisfactorily accounted for their behavior.
Pairs are a very important clue.
Maximum Asymmetry: In contrast to all the nonmeaning, the Scheherazade Numbers seem to emerge at remote positions in numerical progressions of the various orders. They emerge as meaning out of nonmeaning. They show that nature does not sustain disorder indefinitely. From time to time, nature pulses insideoutingly through an omnisymmetric zerophase, which is always our friend vector equilibrium, in which condition of sublime symmetrical exactitude nature refuses to be caught by temporal humans; she refuses to pause or be caught in structural stability. She goes into progressive asymmetries. All crystals are built in almostbut not quitesymmetrical asymmetries, in positive or negative triangulation stabilities, which is the maximum asymmetry stage. Nature pulsates torquingly into maximum degree of asymmetry and then returns to and through symmetry to a balancing degree of opposite asymmetry and turns and repeats and repeats. The maximum asymmetry probably is our minus or plus four, and may be the fourth degree, the fourth power of asymmetry. The octave, again.
Asymmetry, as the author notes, is probably the minus and plus 4 extremities, therefore the symmetry would imply the 9(0) center as noted, also, by the central Dorian/Dorian pair.
W. D. Gann, in his work of forecasting the various markets, divides time and price levels by the octave eight, and also by thirds to derive resistance levels and time periods to watch for trend changes. Nothing other than dividing into eighths and thirds is used to compute time and price levels for resistances or changes in trends in all of his writings. He uses abundant examples to prove his theories. Eighths work out close to some of the fibonacci's, such as 5/8ths, or, 62.5 being close to the fibonacci 61.8, or 3/8ths, 37.5, being close to 38.2. Gann asserts that there is lost motion or momentum that often carries prices slightly off from these support and resistance levels, but uses eighths to measure the exact center of gravity or vibrational harmony from the various ranges and price levels.
Michael's assumptions about "fibonacci 61.8" and the other math assumptions about Gann's system seem in error, however the system is internationally known and does work. The author probably wanted to point out the systems use of fibonacci ratios which all approach .618, the Golden Ratio ^{38} and may have also wanted to explain .37 (Beta) / Master harmonic of modulation (37). ^{39}
Bucky writes: If the readers would like to do some of their own indig exploration they may be instructively intrigued by taking a book of mathematical tables and turning to the table of second powers of integers. If they undertake to indig each of those successively listed secondpower numbers they will discover that, for the first 100 numbers listed, a unique sequence of 24 integers will appear that peaks at 25, reverses itself, and bottoms at one, only to turn again and peak at 50, bottom at 75, and peak again at the 100th number which, when analyzed, manifests a 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 = 2^3 x 3 = 24 fourdimensional wave. This fourdimensional wave is only comprehendible when we discover the threefrequency reality of F^3 x 2 1/2, 3, 4, 5, 6, the apriori, initiallyvolumed, ergo threedimensional reality multiplied by the third power of omnidirectional growth rate. (if interested, refer to Bucky's Synergetics book, chapter on numerology.)
What happens to the 24cell when it peaks at 25 and then collapses? Omar Aam, in addition to linking music with real, complex and quaternion numbers, also illustrates the 12 rhombic faces (the collapsed octahedron of the 24cell) inside a rhombic dodecahedron... ^{36} to which Mr. Aam adds, ".. The octonian has a 3 + 4, or a 3 + 1 + 3 structure." This is the same structure one finds when encountering the 7 pairs of scales, namely, 3 pairs to each side of the central Dorian/Dorian (3+1+3). Does this absolutely prove that these scale pairs are linked to octonians? No, but it suggests many connections.
My own investigations reveal a repeating pattern, of every 24 fibonacci numbers, in which position they land on in successive "square of 12 charts". In one of 15 locations out of the 144 possibilities of each chart, repeating this "landing on" sequence every 24 fibonacci's. 24 repeating sequence x 15 positions which they land on = 360.
Henry's statement, above, caused me to wonder what he was speaking about. It says, "a repeating pattern of every 24 fibonacci numbers"......."in which position they (the fibonacci numbers) land on in successive "square of 12 charts."
This prompted me to construct a grid of 12 x 12 = 144 squares where I found that 24 sequences of 15 positions did not fit. I realized that the "square of 12 charts" do not imply a 144 square grid.
So I tried to find a grid of 360+ permutations. It could be any grid from 10 to 19. ^{48} The correct grid has to conform to accommodating a repetition of the 14 pairs of scales we began with.
I suppose you could stretch things and say that Gann's eighths and thirds multiplied equals 24.
Michael
0.3 The Real Mediator ^{11}
It is found that Newton's prism 'gap' experiment seems to represent the 'Mediator' between "This Side" and the "Other Side" of universe or the Dorian scale raised 2/3. (MetPhys)
Quarks  Collective unconscious (Jerryiuliano) ^{12}
If the unconscious mind is to have an interface with the primitive energies at the edge of reality...quarks... then it must be expressible in a mathematical formula relationship.
This primordial equation exists as an energy decay function:
Let "collective unconscious" constant = 144/37 = 3.891891891...
Then the product of all quark energies is the log e base of the collective unconscious constant ...e = natural log = 2.718281828... IN 2.718281828 = 1
IN [ 10 ^ [ 144/37 / (32^2) ]] = 5.2 * 1.6 * .0074007124251 * 189 * .16 * .0047
....or:
IN [ 10^ [ 144/37 / (32^2) ]] = Bottom * Charm * Down * Top * Strange * Up Leahy's triple logic ( 82944 surface area ) geometrically interfaces reality at this primitive level, using the Hebrew Kabbala " 32 paths of wisdom" as energy to mind conduits; which are continually being energized (squared) as continuous replacements of the decaying transition....e^ (energies).
10^( 82944/37/18/(32^3)) = e ^ ( 5.2 * 1.6 * .0074007124254 * 189 * .16 * .0047)
Note the next level of paths (32^2) which is just energy leveled " up " , that is 32 is the rest state, 32 squared is the energized state , and 32 cubed is the placement of the energized state to reality. The interpretation is that the collective unconscious is the decay product of Natures most primitive energies ..the six quark values:
10 ^ (82944/666/(32^3)) = e ^ ( Bottom*Charm*Down*Top*Strange*Up)
"12 equations" (Iuliano) ^{13}
Is there an equation that is more "symbolic", aesthetically speaking, as to the mass assigned to the top quark in relationship to the other five quarks? The answer is yes. Imagine the top quark at the center of a pentagon with the five "lessor" quarks on the nodal points, these represent the exponential nature of the quark as power functions: [ .037 * .018 / (( T ^ ( B * C * D * S * U * 32 ))  1 )) ^2 = a(em) T = 189.011757536....(proton masses)
This pentagonal arrangement is found on a 20 face icosahedron. This is demonstrated by Toni Smith. ^{29} And these must have a source from which they spring: "The dodecahedron and icosahedron come from the mutual congress of five tetrahedra, a quintuplication." ^{35}
99.80.11 Link: Large Scale Octahedron (Iuliano) ^{22}
"Leahy's number 82944 is 34560 * 24."
Above, an interesting twist. Double octave of semitones x the Tomes Number = Leahy's Double Light squared (288^2)
99.81.1 "34560 harmonic" (JoeDeBrouse) ^{23}
2.4 x 3456 = 82944
3456 / 288 = 12
Above, backwards...Tomes Number divided by Double Light = 12
12 semitones in one octave
86400 = total seconds in one day.
Here is another fractal of the 1 : 2 : 864 ratios we arrived at after dividing 12 : 24 : 34560 by 4 and 3.
86400 is a decimal harmonic of 864Hz, which is 2 octaves above 216Hz.
And, above, another conversion to Hz.
34560 is a decimal harmonic of 3456Hz, which is A natural (Pythagorean tuning)
Above, transferring the Tomes Number to A natural frequency.
3456 / 16 = 216Hz (A natural)
Congruent coincidence:
Height of Gizeh pyramid = 147.6 meters
Median DNA frequency = 544.4Hz
136.1 is 2 octaves below 544.4Hz
147.6 / 136.1 = 1.084 (Decimal subharmonic of A natural)
373250 / 34560 = 10.8 (Decimal subharmonic of A natural)
144,000 is a decimal harmonic of 144Hz (D natural)
The interval: 144Hz (D) and 216Hz (A) form a perfect 5th (Pythagorean tuning)
Regarding 3456, A natural and 34560, decimal harmonic thereof:
Could there be a harmonic convergence that is related to all measurements, both micro and macro that is relative to the musical 5th interval, hence 144 and 216 and there respective octaves, both in decimal and multiples (octaves) of 2,4,8,16, etc??? As this interval is often seen in architecture.
The note A natural could be a universal constant, in that 544.4Hz = C#major 3rd interval of A.
AND, E natural, which is a 5th above A natural, has been recorded in the Crop Circles.
Coincidence?
Added note: 82944 / 16 = 5184 (E natural) crop circle frequency.
99.81.2 "34560 harmonic 2" (JoeDeBrouse) ^{24}
Good and evil reside as complimentary yet opposing forcesthe dual nature of a sine wave with its positive and negative nodes. Perhaps 24 semitones are required to complete a cycle, as in 2 octavesin a 3 dimensional sine wave (double helix)10 nucleotides per 360 degrees of revolution in DNA.
If the universal harmonic is 3456, I am quite astounded by the absolute fact that initiated this correspondence several months ago, when I had NO semblance of what was to come. Remember my mentioning of my paranormal experiences, just since November of 2002? Square root of 373250 = 610.94 of which I stated that 611Hz arrived in my right ear verified on my frequency generator.
3456 / 32 = 108 (A natural) HINDU..KALIYUGA
Above, the Tomes Number divided by the 32 Paths of Wisdom (Kaballa) = HINDU..KALIYUGA: 108 time unit (A natural).
373250 / 3456 = 108 HINDU..KALIYUGA: 108 time unit
99.81.3 "34560 harmonic" (Luigi) ^{25}
If every object of matterenergy is being formed of fluidlike "aether" from a Great Central Oscillator, then there should be a single musical ratio that forms a "master link" for the entire known Universe, on all levels of size.
I consider that ratio to be 45 : 32, which is the ratio of the tritone interval. No other ratio is able to be on both sides of the mirror at once.
99.82.4 Gravity, electrons and the dodecahedron (Iuliano) ^{25}
10 ^ (( 10 ^ (.510998902 ^ 2 ))  12 ) = G(n) = 6.674200049*(10^11)
I note that the appearance of the 12 here as before may be related to the 12 faced dodecadhedron etc. There is a sense in which the mathematical value of each constant by necessity being unitarily determined by each other constant absolutely is a foundation from which any other constant may be directly derived through a simple mathematical transformation.
>..or using the Phi form:
>1/137.03599976 = 5 * (c^2) * h / 4 / Pi / ( Mp^2 ) / (Phi^4 )
This is excellent. See below. A fourdimensional spacetime Golden Ratio? )
> ...Mp = Planck mass = 2.716560866 * ( 10 ^ 8 ) kilograms
>h = Plancks constant = 6.626067864 * ( 10 ^  34 ) Joules
>c = 299792458 meters per second.
>...The only mass for the Einstein equation is the Planck mass form...Mp...which means the force in dynes for inverse Planck masses squared equals:
>a(em) / 5 / h * 4 * Pi * ( Phi ^ 4 ) = ( 1 / ( Mp^2 )) * ( c ^ 2 )
The result has a dimensionless factor a(em), a transcendental factor Pi, etc.
I like this one a lot. It suggests the "complex simplicity" of the physics of nature. Fourdimensional, pentagonal. Since both electromagnetism and gravity operate by inverse square laws  the inverse square of Planck's Mass multiplied by light squared recalling the right side Einstein's equation  magnificent!!!  Energy on the left structured by the 20 vertices of the dodecahedron or 20 faces of the icosahedron ( see Bucky Fuller  Synergetics ) and 4 dimensional Golden Ratio spacetime?
99.57.4 Explanation on mirroring and the Triangles (luigi) ^{27}
In order to apply the regeneration principle to the Major scale we need to know how the Modes flow through it. There may be 12 Major keys known but the Modes always flow in the same order through all 12.
The diagram of the Mode Box (99.57.9) will show that every Major scale can be cycled.
99.57.5 Explanation on mirroring and the Triangles Neutral Centre (MetPhys) ^{28}
Nature flows in triangular angles namely 45 degree left and right over the surface of the 1/2 twist mobiusmusicalDoriantorus, by mirrored 4th and mirrored 5th, crossing each other at the prescribed 90 degree angle or dimensional change. (MetPhys)
...a total of seven times. The above Modes show these seven cycles. Each cycle can be individually mirrored and the results stacked on top of each other. Doing this opens up another system. The Mode Box is a collection of relationships. A Major mode always mirrors to a Minor mode and vice versa. Only the Dorian Mode is perfectly symmetrical and has no partner.
...one group of seven modes are flowing clockwise and the other group of seven modes are moving anticlockwise to that.
RAY TOMES HARMONICS ^{26}
Ray Tomes ratios 12 : 24 : 34560 uses ratio 24. This is a universal set. According to Mr. Tomes, these ratios can be used for any fractal level including all 24 quarks.
34560 / 24 is 1440  Light.
12 : 24 : 34560 / 12 is 1 : 2 : 2880  Double light.
Ratio 1 : 2 seems to be the fraction 1/2 related to double light (288) which 1/2 doesn't fit with the odd denominator's of Laughlin...perhaps we shouldn't reduce 12 : 24 : 34560 because the Tomes Numbers predict harmonic star and atomic distances, as is.
Atomic charge can be notated in scientific terms as ratio, and in musical terms and involves primes in its progressions. The charges also seem to be arrangements of groups of 5 (+ 1 top) upon the 4 pentagonally arranged surfaces/vertexes of both the interrelated and intertransforming dodecahedron and the icosahedron. Further evidence is necessary, pertaining to the claim that the fibonacci series has a 24 cycle repetition, however, the evidence from B. Fuller, J. Iuliano, R. Tomes and other sources, establishes 24 as being real and integral to the cycling structure.
Omar Aam also points out that, "The 7 keys do not add up trivially into the octonian rules...another problem...the octave is just a subset of the 12tone scale. The octonian being embedded in a larger geometrical structure, (a) structure related to the 24cell. The 12 structure is just the background fundament from which the harmonic balance of the octonian stands out."
In addition, the 24cell should represent two 12 note octaves which should account for a pair of modes, for example. Added to this, is another pair of modes since the Table of Charge Ratios requires 2 sets of double modes in each 7 modes. Among several numeric divergences, we find a basic doubling which developes like the spine through the body of information, as 12, 24, 48, 96, 192 and 384. The Preon Model ^{50} also deals with 24 particles and 9 combinations. The Rishon Model (Harrari/Seidberg) ^{50} deals with 16 particles/antiparticles which generates 48 quarks/leptons. MS Squared ^{51} deals with 96 pairs and 192 pairs of possible scales, and 192 doubled again = 384, which is used to number the entire cycle in the TimeWave Zero Model of Terrance McKenna fame and 384 is also a key number in Plato's Timaeus as, "the first of unities." ^{52} So all of these models seem to be rooted in the works of Plato.
REFERENCES:
1. 136 Trinary Relativity
The 18 Note Precession SpinWave (Animation, GIF)
Ray Tomes Harmonics 24 : 34560
Tomes Home
Sanborn (Part 2: Atomic Harmonics 24)
Sanborn Home
>>things within the Dorian actually. The Dorian that carries the 2/2 is
>>not the one to focus on. That one is responsible for the Cosmic
>>Pregnancy, one could say, and it is all "this side". The one that hides
>>the 1/3 and 2/3 you are talking about is the hidden Dorian/Dorian pair,
>>at the 4.5. It all ties in with the 10/17, and the word EVE as well! I
>>mean, what can one say, it is in there. As always I try and get diagrams
>> together to show this, but I wanted to finish off a pdf file and just
>>share it with anyone interested, as always. But in a nutshell, the
>>Dor/Dor running through the F# 4.5 axis comes from the key of E Major.
>>There are six flats and six sharps that constitute a journey to the
>>Poles. E Major has 4 sharps in its key signature. Can you see how the
>>swapover is within a key that is 4/6 within its journey to the poles.
>>Is this not 1/3 to 2/3? Therefore symmetry is held within two sides that
>> act asymmetreically together, although held within a balanced pair...or
>> something like that.
>>So, the D Dorian is not the pair to focus on. It is the F# Dorian on one
>> side, that mirrors to the F# Dorian on the other side, through the 4.5,
>> at which point it enters into a universe (a mirror one, not the dark
>>matter of this one) which has the opposite 2/3 to 1/3 journey, and it
>>will probably be the Gb Dorian/Dorian that it swaps with at the 4.5 on
>>the other side. The "invisible" aspect of the Triangle (one of the ones
>>that make up the star of David) is the E major, because Visibly there is
>> C major on one side, and Ab major on the other. This E major starts at
>>10, and ends on 17
>>C Maj = Vis...................... E Maj =
>>Inv..............................Ab Maj =Vis
>>C D E F G A B C D  E F#' G# A B C# D# E F#  Ab Bb C Db Eb F G Ab Bb
>>(one triangle is 27). This E major key hits the Visible aspect of the
>>trianlge through its F# Dorian Positions, one on each side of the
>>mirror.
>>It's just Door to Door.
>>Lui
? Copyright. Robert Grace. 2004